www.deviqa.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
165.227.113.13
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://deviqasolution-uk.co/
Effective URL: https://www.deviqa.com/
Submission: On April 02 via api from US — Scanned from US
Effective URL: https://www.deviqa.com/
Submission: On April 02 via api from US — Scanned from US
Form analysis 3 forms found in the DOM
<form class="jss61 undefined">
<div class="jss63 ">
<div class="MuiFormControl-root MuiTextField-root jss64">
<div class="MuiInputBase-root MuiInput-root MuiInputBase-formControl MuiInput-formControl"><input aria-invalid="false" name="email" placeholder="Enter your business email" type="text" class="MuiInputBase-input MuiInput-input" value=""></div>
</div>
<div class="jss67"></div><button class="MuiButtonBase-root MuiButton-root MuiButton-text jss65 " tabindex="0" type="submit" style="background:#2D51E0"><span class="MuiButton-label">Book a call</span><span
class="MuiTouchRipple-root"></span></button>
</div>
</form><form class="jss61 jss335">
<div class="jss63 ">
<div class="MuiFormControl-root MuiTextField-root jss64">
<div class="MuiInputBase-root MuiInput-root MuiInputBase-formControl MuiInput-formControl"><input aria-invalid="false" name="email" placeholder="Enter your business email" type="text" class="MuiInputBase-input MuiInput-input" value=""></div>
</div>
<div class="jss67"></div><button class="MuiButtonBase-root MuiButton-root MuiButton-text jss65 " tabindex="0" type="submit" style="background:#2D51E0"><span class="MuiButton-label">Book a call</span><span
class="MuiTouchRipple-root"></span></button>
</div>
</form><form class="jss61 undefined">
<div class="jss63 ">
<div class="MuiFormControl-root MuiTextField-root jss64">
<div class="MuiInputBase-root MuiInput-root MuiInputBase-formControl MuiInput-formControl"><input aria-invalid="false" name="email" placeholder="Enter your business email" type="text" class="MuiInputBase-input MuiInput-input" value=""></div>
</div>
<div class="jss67"></div><button class="MuiButtonBase-root MuiButton-root MuiButton-text jss65 " tabindex="0" type="submit" style="background:#2D51E0"><span class="MuiButton-label">Book a call</span><span
class="MuiTouchRipple-root"></span></button>
</div>
</form>Text Content
Contact us Services Software Testing Models Managed Testing Services Software Testers for Hire QA Outsourcing QA Consulting Dedicated QA Team Software Testing Solutions Software Testing Services Test Automation Digital Transformation Testing Software Performance Testing Software Testing as a Service Systems & Platforms Web Apps Mobile Apps IoT SaaS SAP ERP Enterprises Cloud Blockchain CRM API Coverage Accessibility Testing Full-Cycle Testing Functional Testing Regression Testing Integration Testing Compatibility Testing Industries AI Healthcare FinTech & Banking AdTech HIPAA Compliance Automated Testing Services for BFSI Manufacturing Business Apps Media and Entertainment Cybersecurity Real Estate eCommerce Retail Education Travel Test Coverage: 50% 90% Before After 2.5 weeks to run regression testing 1 day to run regression testing Read More Frameworks Playwright Selenium Cypress K6 Appium Selenide Behave Calabash SpecFlow CodeceptJS TestNG Cucumber Watir WebdriverIO Mocha Robot Jest Vitest Case Studies Podcasts About us About us Our Awards Blog Reviews Careers Whitepapers We have great passion, an extremely skilled team, and many years of experience in building complex solutions while resolving issues that other companies have found to be too difficult. Contact us DEVIQA YOUR QA PARTNER We provide best-in-class quality assurance services to companies of all sizes. Book a call Projects tested from scratch 300 + Integrations into an existing development & testing process 200 + Clients over the globe 300 + Years on the market 14 Software QA engineers 200 + Locations 6 Projects tested from scratch 300 + Integrations into an existing development & testing process 200 + Clients over the globe 300 + Years on the market 14 Software QA engineers 200 + Locations 6 Projects tested from scratch 300 + Integrations into an existing development & testing process 200 + Clients over the globe 300 + AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS PARTNER WITH US: SEE THE DIFFERENCE Test coverage : 90% Before After 2.5 weeks to run regression testing 1 day to run regression testing 7 days to run smoke testing 1 day to run smoke testing Outdated test cases 60% increase in the number of regression tests and relevant test cases 50% test coverage 90% test coverage Supported localizations were not tested 27 localizations supported by QA engineers No automation testing >1500 automated test scenarios created Read Story Dev capacity: +15% Before After Didn’t have a formal QA process Built smooth and well-working processes Didn’t make automated testing Test automation : smoke, API, UI on all supported browsers Testing was carried out by the devs Full coverage of the application by test cases Read Story Test coverage : 97% Before After Existing workflow in Jira didn’t allow to understand how many bugs were left unfixed before the release and their priorities Adjusted the Jira workflow, integrated TestRail with Jira to be able to see statisticls of the issues per release The lack of test documentation Developed necessary test artifacts that adhere to industry standards and are easily maintainable No Automation test coverage Added multithreading to run tests in parallel on 10 different threads, which reduced the time of the test run in 7 times Read Story Regression testing time 2x Before After No formal testing process 2 days to run regression testing >1500 released features >5k of the critical/blocker/major bugs detected >7500 test cases written >10 trained QA specialists on the client’s side Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After A product was unstable and loaded with bugs The product became stable and robust There were no automated tests Automated testing was introduced There was a lack of test documentation Created and maintained all required test documentation Read Story Reported bugs: 2.5k+ Before After A multitude of undetected bugs > 60% high priority bugs reported ~10 specs with unit tests 1400+ E2E automation scripts created New features were not covered by automated tests 90% of the delivered features are covered with autotests Manually executed smoke testing 10 mins to run the entire automated smoke testing suite Read Story Test cases added: 1.9k+ Before After Non-documented infrastructure creation process < 2 weeks to create the infrastructure for a new client 2 weeks to run regression testing >1900 test cases added 1 month to create the infrastructure for a new client >700 automated tests added No test cases 98% test coverage of the desktop agent Read Story Test Time: 20h 2h Before After 20 hours to run regression testing 2 hours to run regression testing 10% test coverage 80% test coverage 1 machine for running tests 30 different machines for running autotests 1 thread for running tests 10 threads for running tests on each machine Read Story Releases per day: 4 5 Before After 1 huge release every 1-2 months 4-5 releases per day 1 large team with an unclear scope of work ~15 squads each with a straight and clear working plan 0 test cases 200+ e2e test cases for the whole app 1-2 months to release a new feature 2 weeks max to release a new feature Convoluted and complex process of urgent bug-fix releases Clear and fast way to release any fix Read Story Regression Testing Time: 2w 2h Before After The manual testing activities were time-consuming and took up to 2 weeks to complete Automation regression testing took 2 hours instead of 2 weeks of manual testing activities There was no formal QA process on the project We established a formal QA process by designing and presenting it to the rest of the team for familiarization and implementation Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After The architecture of the test suite could not be scaled and was difficult to maintain for a large number of tests Designed the architecture of the test framework from scratch Tests couldn’t be integrated with other testing and DevOps tools Integrated auto tests with Jenkins, TestRail, and Jira to have a complete test ecosystem up and running Tests took many hours to be completed Built a test suite that ran auto-tests using 16 threads on multiple machines Read Story Test coverage: 80% Before After Test suite was developed without maintenance and scalability support in mind We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing test suite, identified areas of improvement and implemented best testing practices The high number of issues or defects that were present in the software The number of issues reduced to 25 % after automation was properly implemented Slow test results and the lack of stable automated tests, leading to hindered deployment capabilities SoftNAS experienced several benefits, including faster test results and the acquisition of stable automated tests, resulting in improved deployment capabilities Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After No QA on the project, as result chaotic testing from the developers side only Structured and formalized the testing process The customer support team didn't know the specific functionality of the project and couldn't explain to customers how features work Helped the CS team to understand all the subtleties of the application Not structured, not informative bug reports Created template for bug reports to include all required attributes including logs, attachments for faster issues replication/analysis Read Story All versions were released at the appointed time Before After Lack of QA resources Created and fully stabilized the testing process No ability to execute regression testing before each release The first release was completed three months after we started working on the project Prevented huge number of blockers and crashes caused by the big amount of merging Read Story Test coverage: 95% Before After >70 hours to run regression testing 18 hours to run regression testing >20 hours to run smoke testing 4 hours to run smoke testing Not all product modules were covered with autotests 100% coverage of all existing sub-products <100 mobile automation tests 5 generations of OS for iOS and Android and different devices supported Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After 2 weeks to run regression testing 6 hours to run regression testing Manual API testing >2000+ automated scripts for API testing No smoke tests Smoke testing taking 1 hour to run No tests were executed after developers’ PRs A mini API test suite is executed after each PR, taking 10 minutes only No automation testing >4000+ automated UI + API tests Read Story E2E tests automated: >75 Before After >3 hours to execute manual smoke testing ~30 minutes to execute automated smoke testing ~90% of test cases were outdated 100% test cases reviewed No automation testing >900 test cases are up to date and integrated into the workflow No load tests >600 test cases updated No performance testing 100% of the smoke tests automated Read Story Parallel threads: 15 Before After Outdated BE autotests All existing autotests are up-to-date Only smoke tests were automated on BE ~2800 autotests added No autotests on FE >90% of test cases are automated Manual smoke testing on FE ~99% of smoke tests are automated Manual release testing ~95% decrease in post-release regression bugs, the implementation of test automation has proven to be highly effective Read Story Bugs reported: 3000+ Before After No formal QA process Fine-tuned QA process set up from scratch No automated testing Comprehensive automation testing process implemented from scratch No CI/CD Transfer to a new CI/CD >12 hours to run a regression test suite 4 hours to run a regression test suite No parallel threads 5 parallel threads Read Story Test coverage: 95% Before After Lack of test cases >400 reported bugs Testing was executed by team members who had no expertise in QA >1200 reported defects Lack of testing on real devices >50 reported improvements No automated testing >3 successful releases of a new mobile application Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After No formal testing process 90% test coverage 4 localizations supported >600 automated tests created >10% of the translations are covered with automated tests Read Story Test coverage: 95% Before After ~2000 autotests ~3000 autotests No performance autotests k6-based autotests were integrated into a release flow Low API usage for test data setup ~90% of test data is generated by API, resulting in 2.5 times reduction in execution time Outdated Cypress version was used The latest version of the Cypress framework is used Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After Unstructured QA process <10 mins to run automated smoke testing No automated testing <1 hour to run automated regression testing Manual execution of smoke testing on FE ~90% of the app is covered with test cases Manual execution of regression testing >80% of the delivered features are covered with autotests Read Story Test coverage: 75% Before After Unstable software product with glitches and defects 1.3k automated scenarios in total Manual test execution 1.5 hours to run automated regression testing No regression testing 2 applications are covered with automated regression tests No CI environment 1k+ test cases created Read Story Test cases created: 2.5k+ Before After 40% test coverage >90% of the software is covered with detailed and relevant test cases Manual test execution >400 automated scripts were created in the first 6 months ~1.5 weeks to run regression testing 3 days to run regression testing ~2 weeks to move stories forward 2x faster task handling Read Story Test coverage: >90% Before After There was no formal QA process An efficient and transparent QA process was set up from scratch There was no test documentation Well-structured test cases were created to cover the main scenarios Automation scripts were useless because they didn’t check the required functionality Following best practices, automation testing utilized independent tests, API-driven data creation, and the Page Object Pattern Read Story Test coverage : 90% Before After 2.5 weeks to run regression testing 1 day to run regression testing 7 days to run smoke testing 1 day to run smoke testing Outdated test cases 60% increase in the number of regression tests and relevant test cases 50% test coverage 90% test coverage Supported localizations were not tested 27 localizations supported by QA engineers No automation testing >1500 automated test scenarios created Read Story Dev capacity: +15% Before After Didn’t have a formal QA process Built smooth and well-working processes Didn’t make automated testing Test automation : smoke, API, UI on all supported browsers Testing was carried out by the devs Full coverage of the application by test cases Read Story Test coverage : 97% Before After Existing workflow in Jira didn’t allow to understand how many bugs were left unfixed before the release and their priorities Adjusted the Jira workflow, integrated TestRail with Jira to be able to see statisticls of the issues per release The lack of test documentation Developed necessary test artifacts that adhere to industry standards and are easily maintainable No Automation test coverage Added multithreading to run tests in parallel on 10 different threads, which reduced the time of the test run in 7 times Read Story Regression testing time 2x Before After No formal testing process 2 days to run regression testing >1500 released features >5k of the critical/blocker/major bugs detected >7500 test cases written >10 trained QA specialists on the client’s side Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After A product was unstable and loaded with bugs The product became stable and robust There were no automated tests Automated testing was introduced There was a lack of test documentation Created and maintained all required test documentation Read Story Reported bugs: 2.5k+ Before After A multitude of undetected bugs > 60% high priority bugs reported ~10 specs with unit tests 1400+ E2E automation scripts created New features were not covered by automated tests 90% of the delivered features are covered with autotests Manually executed smoke testing 10 mins to run the entire automated smoke testing suite Read Story Test cases added: 1.9k+ Before After Non-documented infrastructure creation process < 2 weeks to create the infrastructure for a new client 2 weeks to run regression testing >1900 test cases added 1 month to create the infrastructure for a new client >700 automated tests added No test cases 98% test coverage of the desktop agent Read Story Test Time: 20h 2h Before After 20 hours to run regression testing 2 hours to run regression testing 10% test coverage 80% test coverage 1 machine for running tests 30 different machines for running autotests 1 thread for running tests 10 threads for running tests on each machine Read Story Releases per day: 4 5 Before After 1 huge release every 1-2 months 4-5 releases per day 1 large team with an unclear scope of work ~15 squads each with a straight and clear working plan 0 test cases 200+ e2e test cases for the whole app 1-2 months to release a new feature 2 weeks max to release a new feature Convoluted and complex process of urgent bug-fix releases Clear and fast way to release any fix Read Story Regression Testing Time: 2w 2h Before After The manual testing activities were time-consuming and took up to 2 weeks to complete Automation regression testing took 2 hours instead of 2 weeks of manual testing activities There was no formal QA process on the project We established a formal QA process by designing and presenting it to the rest of the team for familiarization and implementation Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After The architecture of the test suite could not be scaled and was difficult to maintain for a large number of tests Designed the architecture of the test framework from scratch Tests couldn’t be integrated with other testing and DevOps tools Integrated auto tests with Jenkins, TestRail, and Jira to have a complete test ecosystem up and running Tests took many hours to be completed Built a test suite that ran auto-tests using 16 threads on multiple machines Read Story Test coverage: 80% Before After Test suite was developed without maintenance and scalability support in mind We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing test suite, identified areas of improvement and implemented best testing practices The high number of issues or defects that were present in the software The number of issues reduced to 25 % after automation was properly implemented Slow test results and the lack of stable automated tests, leading to hindered deployment capabilities SoftNAS experienced several benefits, including faster test results and the acquisition of stable automated tests, resulting in improved deployment capabilities Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After No QA on the project, as result chaotic testing from the developers side only Structured and formalized the testing process The customer support team didn't know the specific functionality of the project and couldn't explain to customers how features work Helped the CS team to understand all the subtleties of the application Not structured, not informative bug reports Created template for bug reports to include all required attributes including logs, attachments for faster issues replication/analysis Read Story All versions were released at the appointed time Before After Lack of QA resources Created and fully stabilized the testing process No ability to execute regression testing before each release The first release was completed three months after we started working on the project Prevented huge number of blockers and crashes caused by the big amount of merging Read Story Test coverage: 95% Before After >70 hours to run regression testing 18 hours to run regression testing >20 hours to run smoke testing 4 hours to run smoke testing Not all product modules were covered with autotests 100% coverage of all existing sub-products <100 mobile automation tests 5 generations of OS for iOS and Android and different devices supported Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After 2 weeks to run regression testing 6 hours to run regression testing Manual API testing >2000+ automated scripts for API testing No smoke tests Smoke testing taking 1 hour to run No tests were executed after developers’ PRs A mini API test suite is executed after each PR, taking 10 minutes only No automation testing >4000+ automated UI + API tests Read Story E2E tests automated: >75 Before After >3 hours to execute manual smoke testing ~30 minutes to execute automated smoke testing ~90% of test cases were outdated 100% test cases reviewed No automation testing >900 test cases are up to date and integrated into the workflow No load tests >600 test cases updated No performance testing 100% of the smoke tests automated Read Story Parallel threads: 15 Before After Outdated BE autotests All existing autotests are up-to-date Only smoke tests were automated on BE ~2800 autotests added No autotests on FE >90% of test cases are automated Manual smoke testing on FE ~99% of smoke tests are automated Manual release testing ~95% decrease in post-release regression bugs, the implementation of test automation has proven to be highly effective Read Story Bugs reported: 3000+ Before After No formal QA process Fine-tuned QA process set up from scratch No automated testing Comprehensive automation testing process implemented from scratch No CI/CD Transfer to a new CI/CD >12 hours to run a regression test suite 4 hours to run a regression test suite No parallel threads 5 parallel threads Read Story Test coverage: 95% Before After Lack of test cases >400 reported bugs Testing was executed by team members who had no expertise in QA >1200 reported defects Lack of testing on real devices >50 reported improvements No automated testing >3 successful releases of a new mobile application Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After No formal testing process 90% test coverage 4 localizations supported >600 automated tests created >10% of the translations are covered with automated tests Read Story Test coverage: 95% Before After ~2000 autotests ~3000 autotests No performance autotests k6-based autotests were integrated into a release flow Low API usage for test data setup ~90% of test data is generated by API, resulting in 2.5 times reduction in execution time Outdated Cypress version was used The latest version of the Cypress framework is used Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After Unstructured QA process <10 mins to run automated smoke testing No automated testing <1 hour to run automated regression testing Manual execution of smoke testing on FE ~90% of the app is covered with test cases Manual execution of regression testing >80% of the delivered features are covered with autotests Read Story Test coverage: 75% Before After Unstable software product with glitches and defects 1.3k automated scenarios in total Manual test execution 1.5 hours to run automated regression testing No regression testing 2 applications are covered with automated regression tests No CI environment 1k+ test cases created Read Story Test cases created: 2.5k+ Before After 40% test coverage >90% of the software is covered with detailed and relevant test cases Manual test execution >400 automated scripts were created in the first 6 months ~1.5 weeks to run regression testing 3 days to run regression testing ~2 weeks to move stories forward 2x faster task handling Read Story Test coverage: >90% Before After There was no formal QA process An efficient and transparent QA process was set up from scratch There was no test documentation Well-structured test cases were created to cover the main scenarios Automation scripts were useless because they didn’t check the required functionality Following best practices, automation testing utilized independent tests, API-driven data creation, and the Page Object Pattern Read Story Test coverage : 90% Before After 2.5 weeks to run regression testing 1 day to run regression testing 7 days to run smoke testing 1 day to run smoke testing Outdated test cases 60% increase in the number of regression tests and relevant test cases 50% test coverage 90% test coverage Supported localizations were not tested 27 localizations supported by QA engineers No automation testing >1500 automated test scenarios created Read Story Dev capacity: +15% Before After Didn’t have a formal QA process Built smooth and well-working processes Didn’t make automated testing Test automation : smoke, API, UI on all supported browsers Testing was carried out by the devs Full coverage of the application by test cases Read Story Test coverage : 97% Before After Existing workflow in Jira didn’t allow to understand how many bugs were left unfixed before the release and their priorities Adjusted the Jira workflow, integrated TestRail with Jira to be able to see statisticls of the issues per release The lack of test documentation Developed necessary test artifacts that adhere to industry standards and are easily maintainable No Automation test coverage Added multithreading to run tests in parallel on 10 different threads, which reduced the time of the test run in 7 times Read Story Regression testing time 2x Before After No formal testing process 2 days to run regression testing >1500 released features >5k of the critical/blocker/major bugs detected >7500 test cases written >10 trained QA specialists on the client’s side Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After A product was unstable and loaded with bugs The product became stable and robust There were no automated tests Automated testing was introduced There was a lack of test documentation Created and maintained all required test documentation Read Story Reported bugs: 2.5k+ Before After A multitude of undetected bugs > 60% high priority bugs reported ~10 specs with unit tests 1400+ E2E automation scripts created New features were not covered by automated tests 90% of the delivered features are covered with autotests Manually executed smoke testing 10 mins to run the entire automated smoke testing suite Read Story Test cases added: 1.9k+ Before After Non-documented infrastructure creation process < 2 weeks to create the infrastructure for a new client 2 weeks to run regression testing >1900 test cases added 1 month to create the infrastructure for a new client >700 automated tests added No test cases 98% test coverage of the desktop agent Read Story Test Time: 20h 2h Before After 20 hours to run regression testing 2 hours to run regression testing 10% test coverage 80% test coverage 1 machine for running tests 30 different machines for running autotests 1 thread for running tests 10 threads for running tests on each machine Read Story Releases per day: 4 5 Before After 1 huge release every 1-2 months 4-5 releases per day 1 large team with an unclear scope of work ~15 squads each with a straight and clear working plan 0 test cases 200+ e2e test cases for the whole app 1-2 months to release a new feature 2 weeks max to release a new feature Convoluted and complex process of urgent bug-fix releases Clear and fast way to release any fix Read Story Regression Testing Time: 2w 2h Before After The manual testing activities were time-consuming and took up to 2 weeks to complete Automation regression testing took 2 hours instead of 2 weeks of manual testing activities There was no formal QA process on the project We established a formal QA process by designing and presenting it to the rest of the team for familiarization and implementation Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After The architecture of the test suite could not be scaled and was difficult to maintain for a large number of tests Designed the architecture of the test framework from scratch Tests couldn’t be integrated with other testing and DevOps tools Integrated auto tests with Jenkins, TestRail, and Jira to have a complete test ecosystem up and running Tests took many hours to be completed Built a test suite that ran auto-tests using 16 threads on multiple machines Read Story Test coverage: 80% Before After Test suite was developed without maintenance and scalability support in mind We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing test suite, identified areas of improvement and implemented best testing practices The high number of issues or defects that were present in the software The number of issues reduced to 25 % after automation was properly implemented Slow test results and the lack of stable automated tests, leading to hindered deployment capabilities SoftNAS experienced several benefits, including faster test results and the acquisition of stable automated tests, resulting in improved deployment capabilities Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After No QA on the project, as result chaotic testing from the developers side only Structured and formalized the testing process The customer support team didn't know the specific functionality of the project and couldn't explain to customers how features work Helped the CS team to understand all the subtleties of the application Not structured, not informative bug reports Created template for bug reports to include all required attributes including logs, attachments for faster issues replication/analysis Read Story All versions were released at the appointed time Before After Lack of QA resources Created and fully stabilized the testing process No ability to execute regression testing before each release The first release was completed three months after we started working on the project Prevented huge number of blockers and crashes caused by the big amount of merging Read Story Test coverage: 95% Before After >70 hours to run regression testing 18 hours to run regression testing >20 hours to run smoke testing 4 hours to run smoke testing Not all product modules were covered with autotests 100% coverage of all existing sub-products <100 mobile automation tests 5 generations of OS for iOS and Android and different devices supported Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After 2 weeks to run regression testing 6 hours to run regression testing Manual API testing >2000+ automated scripts for API testing No smoke tests Smoke testing taking 1 hour to run No tests were executed after developers’ PRs A mini API test suite is executed after each PR, taking 10 minutes only No automation testing >4000+ automated UI + API tests Read Story E2E tests automated: >75 Before After >3 hours to execute manual smoke testing ~30 minutes to execute automated smoke testing ~90% of test cases were outdated 100% test cases reviewed No automation testing >900 test cases are up to date and integrated into the workflow No load tests >600 test cases updated No performance testing 100% of the smoke tests automated Read Story Parallel threads: 15 Before After Outdated BE autotests All existing autotests are up-to-date Only smoke tests were automated on BE ~2800 autotests added No autotests on FE >90% of test cases are automated Manual smoke testing on FE ~99% of smoke tests are automated Manual release testing ~95% decrease in post-release regression bugs, the implementation of test automation has proven to be highly effective Read Story Bugs reported: 3000+ Before After No formal QA process Fine-tuned QA process set up from scratch No automated testing Comprehensive automation testing process implemented from scratch No CI/CD Transfer to a new CI/CD >12 hours to run a regression test suite 4 hours to run a regression test suite No parallel threads 5 parallel threads Read Story Test coverage: 95% Before After Lack of test cases >400 reported bugs Testing was executed by team members who had no expertise in QA >1200 reported defects Lack of testing on real devices >50 reported improvements No automated testing >3 successful releases of a new mobile application Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After No formal testing process 90% test coverage 4 localizations supported >600 automated tests created >10% of the translations are covered with automated tests Read Story Test coverage: 95% Before After ~2000 autotests ~3000 autotests No performance autotests k6-based autotests were integrated into a release flow Low API usage for test data setup ~90% of test data is generated by API, resulting in 2.5 times reduction in execution time Outdated Cypress version was used The latest version of the Cypress framework is used Read Story Test coverage: 90% Before After Unstructured QA process <10 mins to run automated smoke testing No automated testing <1 hour to run automated regression testing Manual execution of smoke testing on FE ~90% of the app is covered with test cases Manual execution of regression testing >80% of the delivered features are covered with autotests Read Story Test coverage: 75% Before After Unstable software product with glitches and defects 1.3k automated scenarios in total Manual test execution 1.5 hours to run automated regression testing No regression testing 2 applications are covered with automated regression tests No CI environment 1k+ test cases created Read Story Test cases created: 2.5k+ Before After 40% test coverage >90% of the software is covered with detailed and relevant test cases Manual test execution >400 automated scripts were created in the first 6 months ~1.5 weeks to run regression testing 3 days to run regression testing ~2 weeks to move stories forward 2x faster task handling Read Story Test coverage: >90% Before After There was no formal QA process An efficient and transparent QA process was set up from scratch There was no test documentation Well-structured test cases were created to cover the main scenarios Automation scripts were useless because they didn’t check the required functionality Following best practices, automation testing utilized independent tests, API-driven data creation, and the Page Object Pattern Read Story OUR SOLUTIONS Flexible collaboration options allow you to choose the level of support that best meets your needs 01. REMOTE QA DEPARTMENT Discover * You need to scale your QA process quickly and efficiently * You want to reduce costs associated with hiring and maintaining an in-house QA team * You need a highly experienced, dedicated and reliable team of QA professionals to ensure the quality of your products 02. QA TEAM AUGMENTATION Discover * You want to expand your QA team on-demand to handle an increased workload or a sudden surge in project demand * You want to quickly and easily access a pool of experienced QA professionals with diverse skillsets and expertise * You need to ensure the quality of your products while maintaining control over your QA process 03. PROJECT-BASED QUALITY ASSURANCE Discover * You want to ensure the quality of a specific project or set of projects without committing to a long-term QA engagement * You want to reduce the risk of project delays or failure due to quality issues * You need a flexible and scalable QA solution for your projects 04. QA AS A SERVICE Discover * You want to outsource your entire QA process to a reliable and experienced QA provider * You want to reduce costs associated with building and maintaining an in-house QA team * You need a full range of QA services, from test planning to execution and reporting, to ensure the quality of your products 05. QA CONSULTING AND AUDIT Discover * You want to optimize your QA process to improve the quality and efficiency of your products * You want to ensure compliance with industry standards and regulations * You want to reduce the risk of quality issues and associated costs ELEVATE YOUR SOFTWARE QUALITY WITH OUR CUTTING-EDGE QA SOLUTIONS. Don’t let software bugs and performance issues jeopardize your reputation. Surpass your competitors with our specialized data-driven QA solutions that ensure detection and rectification of up to 95% of potential issues. Enter your business email below for a free Proof of Concept to start enhancing your software reliability today. Book a call HERE’S WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING ABOUT DEVIQA Testing for Diabetes Care Firm Improving testing process efficiency and remaining mindful of the client’s requirements for the project, DeviQA has been an impressive partner. The firm’s project managers have kept the engagement moving smoothly and have made sure the team is available despite working in a different time zone. Dale Vosburgh Director, Diabetes Care Firm Read Full Review Application Testing for Audio Editing Platform The engagement met the expectations of the internal team, resulting in an easy to maintain testing framework. DeviQA establishes a smooth workflow through consistent communication. The team leverages their technical expertise and experience to produce quality results. Ulf Schwekendiek Lead Engineer, Descript Read Full Review SaaS System Testing for FinTech Startup Through DeviQA’s involvement, the high-quality product has performed reliably and attracted positive customer feedback. The team’s commitment to excellence, consistent availability, and reasonable price point continue to drive success. Raanan Tauber QA Manager, Tipalti Read Full Review Dev and QA Testing for Cybersecurity Platform DeviQA automated numerous testing processes to reduce manual effort and resolved file scanning issues. While the build was projected to take 15 hours, they completed it in just three. The team was highly professional, kept detailed records, and maintained an open dialogue and synergistic workflow. Yuval Or QA Manager, Solebit (Mimecast) Read Full Review Automated Testing for Sales Learning Platform Having DeviQA on board has resulted in finding more defects before deploying features to customers, boosting the end product’s overall quality. Their team is not only supportive but also easy to scale as needed. Efficient communication and punctuality are some highlights of their work. Brad DerManouelian Senior QA Manager, Sales Learning Platform Read Full Review QA and Dev for Financial Firm Time to market has pleased internal stakeholders since DeviQA came on board. They’ve demonstrated a commitment to deadlines and awareness of budget constraints. Customers can expect a reliable team that is comfortable both recommending improvements and fulfilling requirements. Derek Colvin CTO, Financial Firm Read Full Review Integrated QA Team for Healthcare Software Company The final product’s quality was improved greatly and is now stable. The team communicated effectively, with daily check-in calls. They are professional and customer service oriented, with the co-founder occasionally jumping in the project to make sure all ran smoothly. Ralph Zimmermann CTO, SaaS based EHR platform Read Full Review Integrated QA Team for Healthcare Solutions Firm During the first 7 months of the partnership, DeviQA ran over 700 application tests with their solution, leading to a 35% bug reduction in the production environment. The team’s services ensured the quality of the product prior to its delivery to end customers. Vas Bouras Program Manager Read Full Review Enhanced Testing Environment for BI and Big Data Solutions Firm DeviQA developed over 300 test cases in a month and a half, which led to a 70% coverage of the business’ solution and a 45% decrease in its defect rate. Furthermore, the team’s timely services allowed them to implement swinging tests alongside the addition of new pieces of functionality. Brian Huddleston Former VP of Development Read Full Review QA, Automation, DevOps & TechOps Support for QC & QA Co DeviQA has demonstrated to be a highly skilled consultant, as they’ve achieved 95% of the client’s quarterly objectives, as well as sprint goals every two weeks. DeviQA’s consultants are very collaborative and open to feedback. Moreover, their communication and availability are impressive. Alex Ohoussou Head of QA & TechOPs, QIMA Read Full Review Software Testing for Cybersecurity Firm DeviQA has helped the company create hundreds of test cases with speed and efficiency. The client regards their workflow as seamless. Importantly, the vendor understands the client's core business value, allowing them to deliver just as expected of them. Mark Levine VP Product, CYDEF Read Full Review QA Support for SaaS Platform DeviQA is an excellent partner, and the results of their partnership have been positive. They successfully set up the QA process in time, and the client has been pleased with their high-quality services. To operate the QA processes, they collaborated with the client via Jira and GitHub. Olivier Mayot CTO Read Full Review QA Testing for Secure Solutions Company Their independent and accountable team is a significant upgrade compared to experiences with other vendors. DeviQA excels at being punctual, solving problems, communicating effectively, and delivering on their promises. They’re a trustworthy partner that requires minimal supervision. Janosch Greber QA Manager, Secure Mobile Solutions Company Read Full Review * 0 * 1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * 5 * 6 * 7 * 8 * 9 * 10 WHAT YOU GET Average time saved by implementing our multithreaded test automation 300% Reduction in your costs by using outsourced software testing 60% Improvement in time to market for your products and projects 35% Accelerate development by 30% Increase test coverage to 95% Enhancing project quality by 60% Feel the improvement in 3 days Reduce bugs up to 87% Automation faster in parallel by 56x HOW WE CAN HELP YOU Our QA services will improve your control over the product lifecycle, provide insight into the development process, and deliver accurate information on product quality. Accountability for product quality Ensure software compliance Automate testing entirely Build your remote QA team Security and performance Protect Your Brand Build a QA ecosystem Reduce time-to-market ACCOUNTABILITY FOR PRODUCT QUALITY DeviQA will take responsibility for defining the quality standard for your product and your processes. If you don't know where to start, we can: * Educate you on contemporary Quality Assurance best practices, techniques and targeted outcomes * Build the principles of high quality into your operational and development processes * Define the Key Performance Indicators which reflect your products goals and customer promise * Instill a culture of quality, performance, testing and measurement into your teams * Deliver a QA strategy to allow you to structure, deliver and scale your QA approach * Implement tools and systems to support your teams and their QA process * Build a rich library of QA materials, supporting documentation and operational scripts CERTIFICATIONS ISO 9001:2015 At DeviQA, we take pride in being an ISO 9001:2015 certified company. This certification represents our unwavering commitment to maintaining the highest standards of quality in every aspect of our software testing services. With a focus on customer satisfaction, we adhere to internationally recognized quality management practices to ensure that our clients receive exceptional and reliable testing solutions. Through continuous improvement and compliance with regulatory requirements, we consistently deliver top-notch testing services that exceed our clients' expectations ISO 20000 We understand the crucial role of IT services in modern businesses. As an ISO 20000 certified company, we excel in delivering efficient and effective IT services to our clients. Our customer-centric approach enables us to tailor our testing solutions to suit your unique requirements, ensuring a seamless integration of testing processes into your software development lifecycle. With a focus on continual service improvement, we optimize our IT Service Management practices to guarantee a smooth and satisfying experience for our valued clients ISO 27001 The security of our clients' data is of paramount importance to us. As an ISO 27001 certified company, we go above and beyond to protect sensitive information and ensure the confidentiality and integrity of all data entrusted to us. With our robust Information Security Management System (ISMS), we implement stringent security controls, evaluate risks, and take proactive measures to safeguard against potential threats. Rest assured that partnering with us means your valuable data is handled with the utmost care and subject to the highest security standards ISTQB As a testament to our team's expertise and commitment to excellence, our software testing professionals hold the esteemed ISTQB (International Software Testing Qualifications Board) certifications. The ISTQB certification is a globally recognized standard for software testing professionals, signifying their proficiency in the latest testing methodologies, best practices, and industry standards. With ISTQB-certified experts on board, we bring a wealth of knowledge and skills to every testing project, ensuring thorough and precise testing to uncover even the most intricate software defects. Partner with us and benefit from our skilled ISTQB-certified professionals who are dedicated to elevating the quality and reliability of your software products Frequently Asked Questions FAQ FAQ WHAT IS DEVIQA? DeviQA is a leading software testing company. We offer a new approach to quality assurance outsourcing and outstaffing cooperation models. You’ll experience a free proof of concept and streamlined communication process, regardless of geography or time zones, and you’ll benefit from our many years of experience in outsourced software testing services. WHAT ARE DEVIQA PRINCIPLES? Reliability, efficiency, and expertise are the core principles of our QA testing services. We pay close attention to the privacy and security of customer data storage and all intellectual property.We also adhere to the principle of maximum compliance and full transparency in the formation of project teams, striving to establish long-term relationships with our clients. 8 out of 10 new clients rehire us to carry out additional projects. WHAT SOFTWARE TESTING AND QA SERVICES DO YOU PROVIDE, AND HOW DOES YOUR EXPERIENCE SET YOU APART? We offer an extensive range of software testing and QA services for both web and mobile applications. Our expertise is recognized through various awards and real client testimonials, which can be found on our website as well as renowned platforms like Clutch. We work closely with both SMEs and large enterprises, and our team is well-versed in handling large and intricate projects. Leveraging our vast experience and cutting-edge technologies, we deliver unparalleled testing services and craft comprehensive solutions to ensure the utmost quality of your software. Additionally, our offerings encompass QA process design, setup, and taking full responsibility for your project’s quality. HOW DOES DOMAIN EXPERTISE INFLUENCE THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF A QA TESTING SERVICE, AND WHAT INDUSTRIES DOES YOUR COMPANY SPECIALIZE IN? Rich domain expertise is crucial. The deeper the specialists’ understanding of your industry, the quicker they can familiarize themselves with your project. These experts are well-versed in your primary business needs, industry trends, challenges, and standard workflows. Such familiarity enables them to pinpoint your requirements, anticipate and mitigate potential risks, and address issues early in the development process. Our QA testing services boast specialists with wide-ranging domain expertise spanning sectors like healthcare, fintech, entertainment, cybersecurity, education, real estate, retail, and more. COLLABORATION PROCESS OVERVIEW INITIAL CONTACT During our initial call, we aim to understand your testing requirements and goals ASSESSMENT We evaluate your current testing process and create a tailored plan to enhance it PROOF OF CONCEPT We offer a complimentary Proof of Concept, allowing you to experience our proficiency and expertise TRIAL AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE We start a trial period with you, and once complete, we review the results together and discuss options CONTRACT SIGNING AND FULL-SCALE QA IMPLEMENTATION Upon mutual agreement, we move forward with the QA process by signing a contract and beginning work PARTNERSHIP WITH FLEXIBILITY Our engagement options give you commercial flexibility to dial up and dial down resources depending on your own needs LET’S SCHEDULE A CALL Flexible collaboration options allow you to choose the level of support that best meets your needs Book a call © 2024 DeviQA Solutions. Deviqa brand name belongs to Flyant, SL. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy info@deviqa.com