flretirementsolutions.com.advisor.news Open in urlscan Pro
54.211.174.6  Public Scan

Submitted URL: http://ia.advisorstream.com/ls/click?upn=eLUyyUShFg3DbWlTsCvNPxd4YTqgDw-2FWhf34gRSLki1CfMgRu-2BQCnJKrBbkQ-2FAh-2Bnlvra6ZtWst...
Effective URL: http://flretirementsolutions.com.advisor.news/the-4-rule-might-not-work-this-retirement-expert-says-heres-his-strategy-for-a-downturn/?c=eyJ0e...
Submission: On January 28 via api from US — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

<form data-toggle="validator" role="form" id="optinForm" novalidate="true">
  <div class="modal-body no-gutter">
    <div class="row">
      <div class="col-sm-6"> I provide my clients with access to premium subscription copyright protected content to The Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Forbes, The Globe and Mail and other publications. Feel free to access these articles and videos.
        If you would like to receive weekly news updates please provide the following express consent as required by anti-spam laws. </div>
      <div class="col-sm-6 optin-profile">
        <div class="advisor-image">
          <img src="https://app-cms.s3.amazonaws.com/media/easythumbs/profile_photos/2ea34935-2445-478a-b1d8-416ebe789b1f_original_2_ZaBpBZp_CmSHaaI.JPG.225x0_q85.jpg" alt="Maria Navas &amp; Sandy West profile photo">
        </div>
        <div class="advisor-info name"> Maria Navas &amp; Sandy West </div>
        <div class="advisor-info title"> Retirement Specialists </div>
        <div class="advisor-info firm"> Florida Retirement Solutions </div>
        <div class="advisor-info phone"> Office : <a href="tel:786.402.3077">786.402.3077</a>
        </div>
        <div class="advisor-info emails">
          <a href="mailto:floridaretirementsolutions@outlook.com">floridaretirementsolutions@outlook.com</a> <br>
          <a href="https://www.flretirementsolutions.com/" target="_blank">
        www.flretirementsolutions.com
      </a><br>
        </div>
        <div class="advisor-info social">
          <!-- website link here -->
          <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Maria-Navas-110399124006612/" target="_blank">
          <i class="fa fa-facebook-official" aria-hidden="true"></i>
        </a>
          <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/florida-retirement-solutions/" target="_blank">
          <i class="fa fa-linkedin-square" aria-hidden="true"></i>
        </a>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="row">
      <div id="optinFormInput" class="col-12">
        <div class="form-group">
          <label for="optinFirstName">First Name</label>
          <input type="text" class="form-control" id="optinFirstName" placeholder="First Name" data-focus="false" required="">
          <div class="help-block with-errors"></div>
        </div>
        <div class="form-group">
          <label for="optinLastName">Last Name</label>
          <input type="text" class="form-control" id="optinLastName" placeholder="Last Name" data-focus="false" required="">
          <div class="help-block with-errors"></div>
        </div>
        <div class="form-group">
          <label for="optinEmail">Email</label>
          <input type="email" class="form-control" id="optinEmail" placeholder="Email" data-focus="false" required="">
          <div class="help-block with-errors"></div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="modal-footer">
    <div class="row">
      <div class="col-12">
        <p class="casl-consent"> By submitting my contact information, I give my express consent to receive ongoing communications. </p>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="row">
      <div class="col-12 text-right">
        <div class="d-inline-block">
          <button style="display: none;" type="button" class="btn btn-light" id="optinDismiss">No Thanks</button>
        </div>
        <div class="form-group d-inline-block">
          <button type="submit" class="btn btn-primary disabled">Submit</button>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

 


WE CARE ABOUT YOUR RETIREMENT


THE 4% RULE MIGHT NOT WORK, THIS RETIREMENT EXPERT SAYS. HERE'S HIS STRATEGY FOR
A DOWNTURN.

Maria Navas & Sandy West
Retirement Specialists
Florida Retirement Solutions
Office : 786.402.3077
floridaretirementsolutions@outlook.com
www.flretirementsolutions.com




Schedule a meeting
Feedback

By Neal Templin

Jan. 22, 2022

Economist Wade Pfau has been thinking about retirement since he was in 20s. But
not just his own retirement.

Pfau started studying Social Security for his dissertation while getting his
Ph.D. at Princeton University in the early 2000s. At the time, Republicans
wanted to divert part of the Social Security payroll tax into a 401(k)-style
savings plan. Pfau concluded it might supply sufficient retirement income for
retirees—but only if markets cooperated.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

iStock-1296543872.jpg

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today, Pfau is a professor of retirement income at the American College of
Financial Services, a private college that trains financial professionals. His
most recent book, "Retirement Planning Guidebook," was published in September.

While many retirees are banking on a continuing rise in stocks to keep their
portfolios growing, Pfau worries that markets will plunge and imperil this
"overly optimistic" approach. He has embraced oft-criticized insurance products
like variable annuities and whole-life insurance that will hold their value even
if stocks crash, and he has done consulting work for insurers. He wrote another
book, "Reverse Mortgages: How to Use Reverse Mortgages to Secure Your
Retirement," because these loans also can be used as "buffer assets" during
market meltdowns.

Pfau, 44 years old, is already playing around with spreadsheets to analyze his
own retirement plan. He recently built a model to determine when it is best to
convert money from tax-deferred accounts to tax-free Roth accounts, partly
because he wanted the answer for his own retirement accounts. We reached Pfau at
his home north of Dallas. An edited version of our conversation follows:

Barron's: The 4% rule says a retiree can safely withdraw that percentage
annually from a portfolio, adjusted for inflation. Why don't you think it will
work?

Pfau: It's not that I don't think it will work. I think there is something like
a 65% to 70% chance that the 4% rule works for today's retirees rather than
being a near certainty.

It's a debate. Do you just stick with the historical data, or do you make the
adjustment to say, 'Wait a second. With low interest rates, you can't have as
high a bond return as we've had historically, and maybe you can't predict as
high a stock return as we've had historically either'?

What percent can people safely withdraw?

I think 3% would be a lot more realistic in terms of giving the same chance of
success that we usually think about with the 4% rule.

Will people still have enough money to retire with a lower withdrawal rate?

One of the unrealistic assumptions of the 4% rule is that you don't have any
flexibility to adjust your spending over time. Someone could start retirement
with a 4% withdrawal rate if they're willing to cut back on spending somewhat if
we do get into a bad market environment.

Anything else?

People need to be smart about their Social Security claiming decisions. It's OK
to spend down investment assets in the short term so you can delay Social
Security benefits until age 70, at least for the high earner of a married
couple. The boost you get from Social Security benefits by waiting will really
reduce the need to take distributions from investments after age 70.

People also might look at ways to use home equity to support retirement
spending, whether that's downsizing the home or considering getting a line of
credit through a reverse mortgage.

Isn't tapping home equity to avoid selling stocks doubling down on a losing bet?

Using a buffer-based strategy such as home equity does buy into the idea that
over long periods the stock market will perform at a reasonable level. If
there's no market recovery, it is going to be all the more harder to have any
kind of sustainable retirement strategy.

Why are the first years of retirement most dangerous?

It's the idea of sequence-of-return risk. I've estimated that if somebody is
planning for a 30-year retirement, the market returns they experience in the
first 10 years can explain 80% of the retirement outcome. If you get a market
downturn early on, and markets recover later on, that doesn't help all that much
when you're spending from that portfolio because you have less remaining to
benefit from the subsequent market recovery.

What's the solution?

There are four ways to manage the sequence-of-return risk. One, spend
conservatively. Two, spend flexibly. If you can reduce your spending after a
market downturn, that can manage sequence-of-return risk because you don't have
to sell as many shares to meet the spending need. A third option is to be
strategic about volatility in your portfolio, even using the idea of a rising
equity glide path. The fourth option is using buffer assets like cash, a reverse
mortgage or whole life policy with cash value.

What is a rising equity glide path?

Start with a lower stock allocation at the beginning of retirement, and then
work your way up. Later in retirement, market volatility doesn't have as much
impact on the sustainability of your spending path, and you can adjust by having
a higher stock allocation later on.

Why do annuities make sense when interest rates and annuity payouts are low?

Well, because the fact that interest rates are low impacts every strategy. But
the impact of low rates on annuities is less than the impact on a bond
portfolio.

Most income annuities aren't inflation-adjusted.

An income annuity is not going to be the source of inflation protection in the
retirement strategy. That is going to have to come from the investment side. But
the annuity will allow a lower rate of withdrawal from your investment portfolio
early on to mitigate sequence risk. Most retirees naturally spend less as they
age, and they may not need inflation protection

Medical costs go up as you age.

Right, that's the one offsetting factor. The medical expenses increase but
everything else tends to decrease at a fast enough pace so that overall spending
still goes down until very late in life when people may need to pay for more
care in home or a nursing home or other type of long-term care needs.

Is long-term care insurance a good idea?

When I look at traditional long-term care insurance, I struggle a bit because
usually you use insurance for low-probability, high-cost events. And the problem
with long-term care is that it's a high probability, high-cost event.

There are other hybrid approaches where you can combine long-term care insurance
with life insurance or an annuity, and that's where most of the new business is
going, and that has some potential.

How is your own money invested?

At my age level, I'm still primarily in equities.

Do you own annuities?

I'm interested in variable annuities with living benefits, but I'm still too
young. Usually, we don't talk about getting annuities until you're in your
mid-to-late 50s.

Variable annuities have a bad rep. You think it's undeserved?

For a large part undeserved. They get a bad rep because they have a high fee
drag, and I think about retirement not so much about the fee drag but about how
much assets do you need to feel comfortable about retiring. Variable annuities
mean you believe that markets will outperform but you also don't want to stake
your entire retirement on the market so you want some sort of backstop.

You've been a proponent of products sold by insurers such as annuities, and
you've done consulting work for insurers. How can we be sure your research isn't
conflicted?

Whenever I do some sort of research paper, I outline the methodology completely
to give people a full understanding. Nothing is in a black box. The assumptions
are all listed, and if people want to try it with different assumptions, they
can do so.

If I'm concluding that annuities may be helpful, I try to give the benefit of
the doubt in my assumptions to not using the annuities and still find a strong
case can be made for the annuities.

Social Security is more generous than annuities. Shouldn't people max it out
before buying an annuity?

Yes. Insurance companies have to live in the real world so when interest rates
are low that impacts annuities. Indeed if you are thinking about annuities, step
one is at least the high earner in a couple should defer Social Security until
70. And then if you want more annuity protection beyond that, fine. It wouldn't
generally make sense to claim Social Security early and then buy a commercial
annuity at the same time.

Does it ever feel odd to be focused on an event that won't occur for you for a
couple of decades?

For the most part, no. It only comes up at times when somebody is saying why is
this young person telling me how to do retirement.

For me it's not so much retirement, as tracking the ability to be financially
independent. It's still relevant for me to think about when I may be able to
retire, even if I'm not necessarily ready. I have a personal interest in it.

A personal interest in what?

In playing around with spreadsheets and analyzing my own retirement plan. That's
what primarily drove me to do this tax planning research so that I could
specifically build in Roth conversion strategies into my own planning.

Thank you, Wade.

Write to retirement@barrons.com

Copyright 2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Maria Navas & Sandy West
Retirement Specialists
Florida Retirement Solutions
Office : 786.402.3077
floridaretirementsolutions@outlook.com
www.flretirementsolutions.com




Schedule a meeting
Feedback
Licensed Insurance Professional. Respond and learn how insurance and annuities
can positively impact your retirement. This material has been provided by a
licensed insurance professional for informational and educational purposes only
and is not endorsed or affiliated with the Social Security Administration or any
government agency. It is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon
for, accounting, legal, tax or investment advice.

WE CARE ABOUT YOUR RETIREMENT

No Thanks Accept
I provide my clients with access to premium subscription copyright protected
content to The Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Forbes, The Globe and Mail and
other publications. Feel free to access these articles and videos. If you would
like to receive weekly news updates please provide the following express consent
as required by anti-spam laws.
Maria Navas & Sandy West
Retirement Specialists
Florida Retirement Solutions
Office : 786.402.3077
floridaretirementsolutions@outlook.com
www.flretirementsolutions.com


First Name

Last Name

Email


By submitting my contact information, I give my express consent to receive
ongoing communications.

No Thanks
Submit


Sumo