reason.com Open in urlscan Pro
75.2.24.81  Public Scan

URL: https://reason.com/2024/02/11/trumps-alleged-defiance-and-deceit-distinguish-his-handling-of-secrets-from-bidens/
Submission: On February 13 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 3 forms found in the DOM

GET https://reason.com/

<form role="search" method="get" class="search-form" action="https://reason.com/">
  <label>
    <span class="screen-reader-text">Search for:</span>
    <input type="search" class="search-field" placeholder="Search …" value="" name="s">
  </label>
  <input type="submit" class="search-submit" value="Search">
</form>

POST

<form method="post" id="gform_0" class="recaptcha-v3-initialized"><input type="hidden" name="login_redirect" value="/2024/02/11/trumps-alleged-defiance-and-deceit-distinguish-his-handling-of-secrets-from-bidens/">
  <div class="gform_heading">
    <h3 class="gform_title">Login Form</h3>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_body">
    <div id="gform_fields_login" class="gform_fields top_label">
      <div id="field_0_1" class="gfield gfield--type-text gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_1"><label class="gfield_label gform-field-label"
          for="input_1">Username<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_text"><input name="input_1" id="input_1" type="text" value="" class="" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false"> </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_0_2" class="gfield gfield--type-text gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_2"><label class="gfield_label gform-field-label"
          for="input_2">Password<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_text"><input name="input_2" id="input_2" type="password" value="" class="" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false"> </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_0_3" class="gfield gfield--type-remember_me field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below hidden_label gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_3"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label screen-reader-text gfield_label_before_complex"></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_checkbox">
          <div class="gfield_checkbox" id="input_3">
            <div class="gchoice gchoice_3">
              <input class="gfield-choice-input" name="input_3.1" type="checkbox" value="1" id="choice_3">
              <label for="choice_3" id="label_3">Remember Me</label>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_footer top_label"> <button type="submit" id="gform_submit_button_0" class="gform_button button"
      onclick="if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]){return false;}  if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]=true;}  "
      onkeypress="if( event.keyCode == 13 ){ if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]){return false;} if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]=true;}  jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;).trigger(&quot;submit&quot;,[true]); }">Login</button>
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="is_submit_0" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_submit" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_unique_id" value="">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="state_0" value="WyJbXSIsIjVmZDk0MDRiMTc0NTYwODJmYTIwNGZlZDYxN2ViYzJjIl0=">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_target_page_number_0" id="gform_target_page_number_0" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_source_page_number_0" id="gform_source_page_number_0" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_field_values" value="">
  </div>
</form>

POST /2024/02/11/trumps-alleged-defiance-and-deceit-distinguish-his-handling-of-secrets-from-bidens/#gf_17

<form method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" target="gform_ajax_frame_17" id="gform_17" class="puprf-signup-widget recaptcha-v3-initialized"
  action="/2024/02/11/trumps-alleged-defiance-and-deceit-distinguish-his-handling-of-secrets-from-bidens/#gf_17" data-formid="17" novalidate="">
  <div class="gf_invisible ginput_recaptchav3" data-sitekey="6LeMnkUaAAAAALL8T1-XAyB7vxpOeTExu6KwR48-" data-tabindex="0"><input id="input_9ae663dc72ef42b46f2cf3a53ec042e1" class="gfield_recaptcha_response" type="hidden"
      name="input_9ae663dc72ef42b46f2cf3a53ec042e1" value=""></div>
  <div class="gform-body gform_body">
    <div id="gform_fields_17" class="gform_fields top_label form_sublabel_below description_below">
      <div id="field_17_1" class="gfield gfield--type-email gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below hidden_label gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_17_1"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label" for="input_17_1">Email<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_email">
          <input name="input_1" id="input_17_1" type="email" value="" class="large" placeholder="Email Address" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false">
        </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_17_2" class="gfield gfield--type-honeypot gform_validation_container field_sublabel_below gfield--has-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_17_2"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label" for="input_17_2">Phone</label>
        <div class="ginput_container"><input name="input_2" id="input_17_2" type="text" value="" autocomplete="new-password"></div>
        <div class="gfield_description" id="gfield_description_17_2">This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.</div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_footer top_label"> <button type="submit" id="gform_submit_button_17" class="gform_button button"
      onclick="if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]){return false;}  if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]=true;}  "
      onkeypress="if( event.keyCode == 13 ){ if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]){return false;} if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]=true;}  jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;).trigger(&quot;submit&quot;,[true]); }">Submit</button>
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_ajax" value="form_id=17&amp;title=&amp;description=1&amp;tabindex=0&amp;theme=data-form-theme='gravity-theme'">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="is_submit_17" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_submit" value="17">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_unique_id" value="">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="state_17" value="WyJbXSIsIjVmZDk0MDRiMTc0NTYwODJmYTIwNGZlZDYxN2ViYzJjIl0=">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_target_page_number_17" id="gform_target_page_number_17" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_source_page_number_17" id="gform_source_page_number_17" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_field_values" value="">
  </div>
  <p style="display: none !important;" class="akismet-fields-container" data-prefix="ak_"><label>Δ<textarea name="ak_hp_textarea" cols="45" rows="8" maxlength="100"></textarea></label><input type="hidden" id="ak_js_1" name="ak_js"
      value="1707797918953">
    <script>
      document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value", (new Date()).getTime());
    </script>
  </p>
</form>

Text Content

 * Latest
 * Magazine
   * Current Issue
   * Archives
   * Subscribe
   * Crossword
 * Video
 * Podcasts
   * All Shows
   * The Reason Roundtable
   * The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
   * The Soho Forum Debates
   * Just Asking Questions
   * The Best of Reason Magazine
   * Why We Can't Have Nice Things
 * Volokh
 * Newsletters
 * Donate
   * Donate Online
   * Donate Crypto
   * Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
   * Torchbearer Society
   * Planned Giving
 * Subscribe
   * Print/Digital Subscriptions
   * Gift Subscriptions

Search for:


LOGIN FORM

Username(Required)

Password(Required)

Remember Me
Login
Create new account
Forgot password


Joe Biden


TRUMP'S ALLEGED DEFIANCE AND DECEIT DISTINGUISH HIS HANDLING OF SECRETS FROM
BIDEN'S


UNLIKE BIDEN'S CONDUCT, SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT HUR NOTES, THE DOCUMENT-RELATED
CHARGES AGAINST TRUMP FEATURE "SERIOUS AGGRAVATING FACTS."

Jacob Sullum | 2.11.2024 5:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly
versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Classified documents found in Joe Biden's Wilmington garage (Polaris/Newscom)

If Joe Biden will not be prosecuted for mishandling classified material, why
does Donald Trump face 40 felony charges based on conduct that looks broadly
similar? It is a question that Trump's supporters were bound to ask after
Special Counsel Robert Hur, formerly a Trump-appointed U.S. attorney, released
his findings about Biden last Thursday. But Hur's report includes important
details that plausibly explain the contrasting outcomes in these two cases.
Although Biden's embarrassingly hypocritical lapses belie his avowed concern
about safeguarding material that could compromise national security, the
evidence of criminal intent is much stronger in Trump's case.

When Trump left the White House in January 2021, he took thousands of
presidential records, including more than 300 marked as classified. The
superseding indictment released by Special Counsel Jack Smith last July lists 32
of the latter, each of which is the basis for a charge under 18 USC 793(e). That
provision applies to someone who "willfully retains" national defense
information when he "has reason to believe" it "could be used to the injury of
the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation."

Powered By

00:00/02:01
10 Sec


Chiefs fans celebrate another Super Bowl win




Next
Stay





Hur's report focuses on two types of records that Biden retained after serving
as vice president: 1) "documents about military and foreign policy in
Afghanistan" that were marked as classified and 2) "notebooks containing Mr.
Biden's handwritten entries about issues of national security and foreign policy
implicating sensitive intelligence sources and methods." FBI agents found both
types of material in "the garage, offices, and basement den" of Biden's home in
Wilmington, Delaware.

"Contemporaneous evidence suggests that when Mr. Biden left office in 2017, he
believed he was allowed to keep the notebooks in his home," Hur writes. Biden
took the same position in an interview with Hur's office, saying "his notebooks
are 'my property' and that 'every president before me has done the exact same
thing,' that is, kept handwritten classified materials after leaving office." In
particular, he cited "the diaries that President Reagan kept in his private home
after leaving office, noting that they included classified information."

Hur does not agree with Biden's understanding of the law. "If this is what Mr.
Biden thought, we believe he was mistaken about what the law permits," he says.
But he adds that Biden's position "finds some support in historical practice."
The "clearest example," he says, is "President Reagan, who left the White House
in 1989 with eight years' worth of handwritten diaries, which he appears to have
kept at his California home even though they contained Top Secret information."

Yet as far as Hur could tell, neither the Justice Department nor any other
federal agency took steps to "investigate Mr. Reagan for mishandling classified
information or to retrieve or secure his diaries." Hur concludes that "most
jurors would likely find evidence of this precedent and Mr. Biden's claimed
reliance on it, which we expect would be admitted at trial, to be compelling
evidence that Mr. Biden did not act willfully."



What about the Afghanistan documents that were marked as classified? The
strongest evidence of Biden's intent regarding them is a remark he made during a
recorded conversation with his ghostwriter in February 2017, the month after he
left office. Discussing a 2009 memo he had written in opposition to a troop
surge in Afghanistan, Biden noted that he had "just found all the classified
stuff downstairs." At the time, Biden was renting a home in Virginia, which he
kept until 2019. Assuming he was talking about the Afghanistan documents that
the FBI later found in Wilmington, which is likely but not certain, that comment
shows Biden knew the material was classified. But Hur notes defenses Biden could
raise against a charge based on that admission.

"Mr. Biden could have found the classified Afghanistan documents at his Virginia
home in 2017 and then forgotten about them soon after," Hur writes. "When Mr.
Biden told his ghostwriter about finding 'all the classified stuff downstairs,'
his tone was matter-of-fact. For a person who had viewed classified documents
nearly every day for eight years as vice president, including regularly in his
home, finding classified documents at home less than a month after leaving
office could have been an unremarkable and forgettable event. Notably, the
classified Afghanistan documents did not come up again in Mr. Biden's dozens of
hours of recorded conversations with the ghostwriter, or in his book. And the
place where the Afghanistan documents were eventually found in Mr. Biden's
Delaware garage—in a badly damaged box surrounded by household detritus—suggests
the documents might have been forgotten."

That explanation, Hur says, is reinforced by the fact that Biden's memory "was
significantly limited, both during his recorded interviews with the ghostwriter
in 2017" and "in his interview with our office in 2023." Hur alludes to Biden's
difficulty in remembering things several times, saying a jury might view him as
"a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." Although that
characterization is politically damaging, it would be extenuating in the context
of a charge under 18 USC 793(e).



Hur notes that Biden's "cooperation with our investigation, including by
reporting to the government that the Afghanistan documents were in his Delaware
garage, will likely convince some jurors that he made an innocent mistake,
rather than acting willfully—that is, with intent to break the law—as the
statute requires." The documents "could have been stored, by mistake and without
his knowledge, at his Delaware home since the time he was vice president, as
were other classified documents recovered during our investigation."

One of Biden's notebooks, marked as "Af/Pak 1," contained his handwritten 2009
memo on the troop surge. Biden "initially said he was not aware that he had kept
the Thanksgiving memo after his vice presidency" but later conceded that "I
guess I wanted to hang onto it for posterity's sake." Two other notebooks
contained documents marked as classified, but Hur concludes that "the evidence
does not suggest either that Mr. Biden retained the classified documents inside
them willfully, or that the documents contain national defense information."

Hur also discusses "nine documents with classification markings" that were found
in Biden's office at the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement,
a think tank in Washington, D.C. At the same location, the FBI also found "a set
of handwritten notes" that were "potentially classified."

Hur says "there is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents" about the Iran
nuclear deal that were found in an "eyes only" envelope. Rather, "the evidence
supports an innocent explanation for the unauthorized retention of those
documents." Biden and his staff "appear to have eventually forgotten about" that
envelope, which was "unwittingly moved…out of the West Wing at the end of the
administration." Hur likewise found "insufficient evidence to support charging
Mr. Biden for the retention of the other marked classified documents recovered
from the Penn Biden Center."



Finally, Hur discusses "just over a dozen" classified documents that were found
at the University of Delaware among Biden's papers from his time as a senator.
"Almost all of these documents predate the Senate's establishment of rules for
the tracking and handling of classified information," Hur writes. "The evidence
does not suggest that Mr. Biden willfully retained these documents. Rather, they
appear to have been included in his large collection of Senate papers by
mistake."

In addition to Biden's notebooks, Hur lists fewer than 100 "recovered documents"
that either were marked as classified or included classified information. That
represents about a third of the classified documents that the FBI says Trump
took with him when he left the White House. While Biden's documents span
decades, Trump's trove came from his single term as president. But when it comes
to criminal liability, the raw numbers are less important than how the retention
of sensitive material came to light and how Biden and Trump responded to that
discovery.

"With one exception, there is no record of the Department of Justice prosecuting
a former president or vice president for mishandling classified documents from
his own administration," Hur notes. "The exception is former President Trump."
And while "it is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump," he says, there are "several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's
case and Mr. Biden's."

Notably, those "material distinctions" have nothing to do with Trump's authority
as president to declassify documents—a point frequently raised by his defenders.
Unlike Trump, they say, Biden had no such authority as vice president. But
whatever you make of Trump's claim that the documents he took were
"automatically declassified," whether through a "standing order" or simply "by
thinking about it," it is a red herring in the context of charges under 18 USC
793(e), which does not refer to classification at all. The relevant questions
under that provision are whether the information in those documents was
potentially damaging to national security, whether Trump should have recognized
that, and whether he nevertheless "willfully" retained them.



In any case, the charges against Trump go beyond that statute. Unlike "the
evidence involving Mr. Biden," Hur writes, "the allegations set forth in the
indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents
and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the
indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he
also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie
about it."

That alleged conduct underlies eight additional felony charges against Trump.
"In contrast," Hur writes, "Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the
National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview, and in
other ways cooperated with the investigation." Trump's alleged defiance and
deceit, in short, distinguish his conduct from Biden's: They suggest that Trump
retained national defense information "willfully," as required for a conviction
under 18 USC 793(e), and that he committed additional crimes to cover up the
underlying offense.

Notwithstanding these significant differences, there is no disputing that
Biden's carelessness blatantly contradicts his criticism of Trump's "totally
irresponsible" behavior. "Asked about reports that former President Trump had
kept classified documents at his own home," Hur notes, "Mr. Biden wondered how
'anyone could be that irresponsible' and voiced concern about '[w]hat data was
in there that may compromise sources and methods.'"

Biden made those comments in a 60 Minutes interview about a month after the FBI
searched Mar-a-Lago, where it found more than 100 classified documents that
Trump had kept after assuring the Justice Department that he had returned
everything in that category. Two months later, six days before the midterm
elections, Biden's lawyers found "a small number of documents with classified
markings" at his think tank office. The White House did not acknowledge that
discovery until the following January, and thus began a series of revelations
that expanded the number of searched locations and the number of retrieved
documents.



"We found a handful of documents were filed in the wrong place," Biden said in
January 2023, taking refuge in the passive voice. "I think you're going to find
there's nothing there." The next day, the FBI found additional classified
documents at his house.

Hur plausibly concluded that criminal charges against Biden were not appropriate
because there was insufficient evidence that he "willfully" retained documents
he was not supposed to have. But that does not let Biden off the hook for
repeatedly violating the standard of care that he himself insists is essential
to protecting national security.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and
trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

Email(Required)

Phone

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Submit

Δ

NEXT: Why Are Teens Depressed? It's Not Social Media

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason.

Joe BidenDonald TrumpNational SecuritySecrecyGovernment secrecyCriminal
JusticeDepartment of JusticeFBI
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly
versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (171)


LATEST

SCOTUS IS TROUBLED BY THE CLAIM THAT STATES CAN DISQUALIFY TRUMP FROM THE
ELECTION AS AN INSURRECTIONIST

Jacob Sullum | 2.12.2024 1:35 PM

PROTECT ACT COULD REQUIRE REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING PORN ONLINE

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 2.12.2024 12:00 PM

BIDEN'S BIZARRE 'SHRINKFLATION' NONSENSE

Eric Boehm | 2.12.2024 11:15 AM

DELINQUENT COUNTRIES

Liz Wolfe | 2.12.2024 9:30 AM

JOE BIDEN'S NO GOOD, VERY BAD DAY

J.D. Tuccille | 2.12.2024 7:00 AM





 * About
 * Browse Topics
 * Events
 * Staff
 * Jobs
 * Donate
 * Advertise
 * Subscribe
 * Contact
 * Media
 * Shop
 * Amazon

Reason FacebookReason TwitterReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeReason
ItunesReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of
Service apply.



Notifications