www.nytimes.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.193.164  Public Scan

URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/17/nyregion/marijuana-mother-child-removed-lawsuit.html
Submission: On May 17 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

POST https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/17/nyregion/marijuana-mother-child-removed-lawsuit.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083

<form method="post" action="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/17/nyregion/marijuana-mother-child-removed-lawsuit.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"
  data-testid="MagicLinkForm" style="visibility: hidden;"><input name="client_id" type="hidden" value="web.fwk.vi"><input name="redirect_uri" type="hidden"
    value="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/17/nyregion/marijuana-mother-child-removed-lawsuit.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"><input name="response_type"
    type="hidden" value="code"><input name="state" type="hidden" value="no-state"><input name="scope" type="hidden" value="default"></form>

Text Content

Skip to content

Sections
SEARCH
New York

SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEKLog in
Wednesday, May 17, 2023
Today’s Paper
SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEK
New York|She Smoked Weed, Legally, Then Gave Birth. New York Took Her Baby.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/17/nyregion/marijuana-mother-child-removed-lawsuit.html
 * Give this article
 * 
 * 

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Supported by

Continue reading the main story





SHE SMOKED WEED, LEGALLY, THEN GAVE BIRTH. NEW YORK TOOK HER BABY.

The city’s child welfare agency is not supposed to remove children solely
because of a parent’s marijuana use. A mother says the agency did so anyway, and
now she is suing.

 * Send any friend a story
   
   As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can
   read what you share.
   
   
   Give this article
 * 
 * 
 * Read in app
   


Chanetto Rivers fought for custody of her baby after he was taken from her
because she smoked marijuana shortly before giving birth.Credit...Hiroko
Masuike/The New York Times


By Andy Newman

May 17, 2023Updated 5:12 p.m. ET

For Chanetto Rivers, the birth of her third child went relatively smoothly.
About an hour after she arrived at the hospital in the Bronx, she was holding
her newborn son.

But while she was pushing, in a maternity room crowded with doctors and nurses,
someone asked a question: Had she consumed drugs or alcohol?

Ms. Rivers answered that she had smoked marijuana at a family barbecue hours
earlier. She thought nothing of it — it was August 2021; marijuana had been
legal in New York for months.

Without Ms. Rivers’s consent, she said, she and her baby were tested for drugs.
Both were positive for marijuana. Two days later, the city’s child welfare
agency, the Administration for Children’s Services, ordered the hospital not to
release the baby to Ms. Rivers, her lawyers said.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Two days after that, A.C.S. told Ms. Rivers it was opening a neglect case and
moving to place her baby in foster care.

New York’s legalization law bars removing a child for a parent’s marijuana use
alone. A.C.S.’s policy states that marijuana in an infant’s system is not
grounds for removal without a finding that the baby might be impaired, and
A.C.S. never said that the baby, identified in court papers as T.W., was harmed
by the marijuana exposure, Ms. Rivers’s lawyers said.

But it took nearly a week altogether, multiple trips to court and a judge’s
order before she gained custody of her son.


MORE ABOUT CANNABIS


WITH RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA BECOMING LEGAL IN SEVERAL STATES, CANNABIS PRODUCTS
ARE BECOMING MORE EASILY AVAILABLE AND INCREASINGLY VARIED.

 * Federal Recruiters Relax Rules: As more states legalize marijuana and
   competition for talent grows fiercer, the U.S. government is loosening hiring
   rules from the “Just Say No” era.
 * Weed Addiction: Though the consequences of cannabis use disorder are not as
   severe as with other drugs, it can affect your quality of life.
 * Cannabis and Sleep: We asked some experts to explain marijuana’s effects on
   sleep. Here is what to know.
 * Betting the Farm on Weed: The Hepworth sisters are famous in the organic food
   world, but like other farmers, they’re struggling. They hope their new
   cannabis venture will change things.

Even then, she was not free of A.C.S. For three more months, her lawyers said,
the agency required her to attend classes in parenting and anger management and
to take drug tests. Caseworkers came to her apartment unannounced at random
hours, including in the middle of the night.

On Wednesday, Ms. Rivers’s lawyers, the Bronx Defenders, sued A.C.S. on her
behalf in federal court in Manhattan. The suit says the agency went after Ms.
Rivers so aggressively “not because A.C.S. was trying to protect T.W.” but
“because Ms. Rivers is Black.”



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



The lawsuit argues that Ms. Rivers’s treatment fits a decades-long pattern of
discrimination against Black families by A.C.S., some of it documented in a 2020
audit in which the agency’s own employees said that A.C.S. was racist.



The lawsuit also noted that one of the main purposes of the Marijuana Regulation
and Taxation Act of 2021 was to undo generations of harm caused by drug laws
that were disproportionately wielded against Black and Hispanic people.

Ms. Rivers’s lead lawyer, Niji Jain, said the agency’s removal of T.W. “was the
wrong decision on the law, it was the wrong decision on the facts, and then
there’s the historical context.”

She was referring, in part, to the largely discredited “crack baby” hysteria of
the 1980s and ’90s, in which researchers and media reports falsely described a
vast epidemic of children damaged by their mothers’ cocaine use.

The case comes as marijuana’s legalization in New York has created uncertainty
for authorities about how to treat its use. The state now bars employers from
discriminating against workers who use marijuana legally; there are exceptions
for employees who are impaired by marijuana while working, though there is no
clearly drawn definition of impairment.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Ms. Rivers had a prior child welfare case; she lost custody of her two older
children in 2016 for drug and alcohol use and for failing to obtain medical care
for her older son.

But her lawyers said that her history was irrelevant. They said that A.C.S. had
already cleared her to regain custody of her older children (though they had not
yet moved back in with her at the time of T.W.’s birth because of court delays),
and that both judges who presided over the T.W. case had said Ms. Rivers’s
earlier case did not create an imminent risk to the baby.

A.C.S. also said that the hospital said Ms. Rivers had smoked marijuana in her
room, an accusation she denied, according to the suit.

A.C.S. said it was barred from commenting on individual cases by state
confidentiality laws but stated that it does not remove children based solely on
a parent’s use of marijuana.

“When A.C.S. investigates a case involving an allegation of parental
drug/alcohol misuse (regardless of what the substance is), A.C.S.’s policy and
practice mandated under law is to assess the impact any misuse has or may
imminently have on child safety,” an agency spokeswoman, Stephanie Gendell, said
in a statement.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



While there have been other instances since legalization where A.C.S. cited a
parent’s marijuana use as a reason to remove a child, Bronx Defenders said Ms.
Rivers’s case was the first they knew of where it was the only reason. According
to the suit, T.W. did not receive any treatment at the hospital related to the
marijuana exposure.

The lawsuit, which Bronx Defenders co-filed with the firm Arnold & Porter, also
charges A.C.S. with violating Ms. Rivers’s constitutional right to due process.
The two parties filed a companion suit on Wednesday charging that A.C.S. had
illegally withheld documents connected to the racial equity audit.

Research has shown that Black expectant mothers are tested disproportionately
for drugs. A study published last month in the journal JAMA Health Forum of
nearly 40,000 births in Pennsylvania hospitals from 2018 to 2021 found that
Black mothers were more likely to be drug-tested than white mothers, even though
white mothers were more likely to test positive. Ms. Rivers’s hospital,
BronxCare Health System, did not immediately respond to questions on Wednesday
about whether it had tested Ms. Rivers and her son without her consent.

Research also suggests that the first days of a baby’s life are a critical
bonding time. While T.W. was in the hospital, Ms. Rivers, 34, was allowed to
visit him every day, but only briefly, she said.

When T.W. was brought to her, “it was like I was being watched and calculated
and observed,” she said.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



“Every time I went there, I would try to feed him and they’d be like, ‘Oh, we
already fed him,’ or ‘we already changed his Pamper’ — they did everything that
nurtured my own baby,” she said.

Dr. Mishka Terplan, an author of the Pennsylvania study, said in an email that
measurable effects of prenatal cannabis use on child development “are rare,
subtle, and of uncertain clinical significance.”

Dr. Terplan added that in cases like Ms. Rivers’s, “separation of a child from
its care giver is likely significantly worse for its development than the
cannabis exposure.”

Ms. Rivers’s case came before two family court judges. The first said he found
it “troubling that A.C.S. runs to court” to seek removal based purely on
marijuana use, the suit states.

The second ordered A.C.S. to return Ms. Rivers’s baby, over the agency’s
objections. The judge noted that while she believed testimony that Ms. Rivers
had smoked marijuana in the hospital, “that still does not rise to the level of
imminent risk,” according to the suit.

The T.W. case ended up further delaying Ms. Rivers’s efforts to regain custody
of her older children, the suit states. She won custody of them only after
A.C.S. dropped the T.W. case, 107 days after he was born.







Advertisement

Continue reading the main story




SITE INDEX




SITE INFORMATION NAVIGATION

 * © 2023 The New York Times Company

 * NYTCo
 * Contact Us
 * Accessibility
 * Work with us
 * Advertise
 * T Brand Studio
 * Your Ad Choices
 * Privacy Policy
 * Terms of Service
 * Terms of Sale
 * Site Map
 * Canada
 * International
 * Help
 * Subscriptions



Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

See subscription options