www.sciencedirect.com Open in urlscan Pro
162.159.136.70  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.036
Effective URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141029618309507?via%3Dihub
Submission: On September 14 via api from US — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

GET /search#submit

<form class="QuickSearch" action="/search#submit" method="get" aria-label="form">
  <div class="search-input">
    <div class="search-input-container search-input-container-no-label"><label class="search-input-label u-hide-visually" for="article-quick-search">Search ScienceDirect</label><input type="search" id="article-quick-search" name="qs" value=""
        class="search-input-field" aria-label="Search ScienceDirect" aria-describedby="article-quick-search-description-message" placeholder="Search ScienceDirect"></div>
    <div class="search-input-message-container">
      <div aria-live="polite" class="search-input-validation-error"></div>
      <div id="article-quick-search-description-message"></div>
    </div>
  </div><button type="submit" class="button small u-margin-xs-left button-primary button-icon-only" aria-disabled="false" aria-label="Submit search"><svg focusable="false" viewBox="0 0 100 128" height="20" width="18.75" class="icon icon-search">
      <path
        d="m19.22 76.91c-5.84-5.84-9.05-13.6-9.05-21.85s3.21-16.01 9.05-21.85c5.84-5.83 13.59-9.05 21.85-9.05 8.25 0 16.01 3.22 21.84 9.05 5.84 5.84 9.05 13.6 9.05 21.85s-3.21 16.01-9.05 21.85c-5.83 5.83-13.59 9.05-21.84 9.05-8.26 0-16.01-3.22-21.85-9.05zm80.33 29.6l-26.32-26.32c5.61-7.15 8.68-15.9 8.68-25.13 0-10.91-4.25-21.17-11.96-28.88-7.72-7.71-17.97-11.96-28.88-11.96s-21.17 4.25-28.88 11.96c-7.72 7.71-11.97 17.97-11.97 28.88s4.25 21.17 11.97 28.88c7.71 7.71 17.97 11.96 28.88 11.96 9.23 0 17.98-3.07 25.13-8.68l26.32 26.32 7.03-7.03">
      </path>
    </svg></button><input type="hidden" name="origin" value="article"><input type="hidden" name="zone" value="qSearch">
</form>

Text Content

JavaScript is disabled on your browser. Please enable JavaScript to use all the
features on this page. Skip to main contentSkip to article
ScienceDirect
 * Journals & Books

 * 
 * Search

RegisterSign in

 * Access through your institution
 * Purchase PDF

Search ScienceDirect



ARTICLE PREVIEW

 * Abstract
 * Introduction
 * Section snippets
 * References (64)
 * Cited by (12)
 * Recommended articles (6)


ENGINEERING STRUCTURES

Volume 175, 15 November 2018, Pages 27-40




SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAME WITH HEXAGONAL PATTERN OF
BRACES TO MITIGATE SOFT STORY BEHAVIOR

Author links open overlay panelNiloufar Mashhadiali, Ali Kheyroddin
Show more
Add to Mendeley
Share
Cite
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.036Get rights and content




ABSTRACT

This paper aims to propose an innovative braced frame named hexa-braced frame
for the improvement of the seismic response of conventional steel-braced frames.
In the proposed system, vertical structural elements connect the V and
inverted-V bracings over three stories to form the hexagonal bracing
configuration, in which two stories are braced at the top and bottom. The
objective is to distribute deformation demands along the height of the frame in
order reduce the possibility of the soft-story mechanism, which is a concern in
conventional steel-braced frames. To achieve this objective, the braced columns
were designed to resist bending moments calculated by means of a simple analysis
procedure. A set of 4-, 10-, and 20-story building models were used to evaluate
the seismic response of the proposed bracing system through nonlinear static
(monotonic and cyclic) and dynamic analyses. The results were compared with the
responses of similar X-braced frame models as the benchmark. Analytical results
reveal that the hexa-braced frame system has the desired structural behavior for
the seismic resistant and can achieve the goal of uniform distribution of
lateral deformation in order to reduce the soft-story failure.


INTRODUCTION

In recent years, many engineers have turned to the use of innovative earthquake
resistant structural systems for the provision of stiffness and ductility and
prevention of damage concentration. Several deficiencies of the conventional
steel seismic load-resisting systems are listed, including concentrically braced
frames (CBFs) [1], [2], [3] and moment-resisting frames (MRFs) [4], [5]. For MRF
structures, brittle fracture of the beam-to-column connections was observed in
the 1994 Northridge earthquake and was thoroughly addressed in the subsequent
design provisions, such as AISC 358 in the U.S [6]. For CBF structures, a
comparison of the ductility capacity of the system with the seismic ductility
demands is necessary. Steel CBFs may be used in regions where the ductility
demand is not significant and the frame still provides the adequate ductility
capacity [7], [8], [9]. Additionally, the main reason for the undesirable
performance of CBF buildings is the soft-story mechanism, in which a single
story incurs major damage whereas the remaining stories are relatively undamaged
[10].

Over the past few decades, for simplicity and economic considerations, the
popularity of CBFs has increased significantly compared to MRFs [11], [12],
[13]. CBFs act as vertical concentric trusses which resist lateral loads through
axial forces. In past earthquake events, the major concern for CBFs was low
drift capacity [14]. Post-earthquake observations, numerical studies and
experimental investigations indicate that the damage concentration occurred in a
few weak stories of the CBFs during severe earthquakes. Several studies have
been conducted to attempt to reduce the damage concentration in CBFs. Approaches
include: (1) the use of dual structural systems for a combination of MRFs and
CBFs as a backup system in which the frame action compensates for the loss of
story shear capacity due to brace buckling [15], [16]; (2) application of
slender braces in which a large tension to compression capacity results in the
redistribution of forces from the compression brace to the tension brace [17],
[18]; (3) the use of BRBs with relatively large deformation hardening value in
which large plastic strains lead to yielding in the adjacent stories [19], [20],
[21]; (4) the use of a continuous column in which the flexural strength and
stiffness to prevent soft-story mechanisms in inelastic demand that transfers
the load capacity lost by localized brace buckling to other stories in the
system [22], [23]; (5) the use of a tie column in a zipper-braced frame to
distribute the inelastic demand over the height of the building [24], [25],
[26]; (6) the use of a strong back system in which an elastic truss system
mitigates soft-story behavior [27], [28], [29]. Other variants such as friction
dampers [30], a rocking brace core [31], [32] and negative stiffness device
[33], [34] constitute a possible solutions to reducing the damage concentration
in CBFs.

This paper proposes an innovative braced-frame configuration in relation to the
hexa-braced frame (Hexa-BR) system. It contains both V- and inverted V-braces in
different stories, forming the hexagonal bracing configuration over three
stories. It is a combined system comprising continuous columns and braces for
seismic resistance. In the proposed system, all the beams are connected to the
columns with simple pins. Fig. 1 presents two possible bracing configurations of
hexa-braced frame. Based on the length of braced bay, two types of chevron and
diagonal braces are used to form hexa-bracing configuration. In hexa-braced
frame column, bending moment, shear and axial forces are the internal actions
due to seismic loads. Compared with the conventional CBF, the hexa-braced frame
columns are subjected to substantial flexural demand which is led to be
stronger.

In a typical research, the design of CBF columns for seismic resistance is based
on truss action and is governed by the column axial forces, while neglecting the
flexural demand on columns in the design of braced frames. Braced frame with no
column flexural strength and stiffness allows soft-story mechanism in inelastic
demand.

MacRae et al. [22], in a study on the seismic behavior of steel frames, reported
that the pattern of column moments required against to a soft-story mechanism
should be considered in the design of braced frames in order to reduce damage
concentration. Some researchers concluded that the continuous columns in the
real frame significantly decreased the possibility of drift concentration due to
the flexural demand [35], [36]. Wang et al. [37] compared the influence of a
continuous column in a X-bracing system using V-braced and inverted V-braced
frames in which the columns were considered to be continuous over two stories
and over the height of the building, respectively. They concluded that providing
continuous columns over the height of the building is more beneficial. However,
it is known that the prevention of a soft story can be assured only if a
rigorous design procedure is considered, even when experimental evidence shows
that such a mechanism can be delayed by the use of continuous columns [38],
[39]. A proposed technology to create more uniform displacement involves the use
of rocking cores as a continuous column, which is pinned to the building of CBF
through the pin-pin link [40] (Fig. 2). This technique applies a strong column
to distribute lateral demand, thereby preventing soft-story mechanism.

The proposed hexa-braced frame configuration combines the following two
concepts: continuous strong column and flexural demand to achieve uniform drift
distribution along the height of a building and to prevent the formation of
soft-story mechanism.

The hexa-braced frame structural system is a new approach for hexagrid
structures. The hexagrid system is located at the perimeter of the building; it
includes multiple hexagonal grids limited by the mega columns. Mashhadiali and
Kheyroddin [41], for the first time in a study of the structural behavior of
hexagrid system, investigated its lateral load and progressive collapse
resistance for tall buildings [42], [43]. Recently, the use of hexagrid patterns
for structural effectiveness and aesthetics has attracted the attention of
engineers [44]. The Sinosteel International Plaza [45] is a tall building in
which hexagonal pattern was utilized for the first time for the structural
system, and other engineering plans of hexagrid structures were also proposed
(Fig. 3) [46], [47]. However, the design intention of the hexagrids and
hexa-braced frame are different. The hexagrid system is a tube type lateral
resistance system, but the hexa-braced frame is a new bracing system.

This study presents a description of the proposed hexa-braced frame as a new
seismic-resistant bracing system. A simple static analysis methodology is
presented to determine the column bending moment. Different structural models
are designed to evaluate the seismic behavior of the hexa-braced frame compared
to similar X-braced frame models as the benchmark. In order to indicate that the
proposed bracing system are extendable to a wide range of buildings, the model
buildings are conducted with different height representing low-, mid- and
high-rise structures. Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses are performed to
examine seismic responses of model structures.


SECTION SNIPPETS


DESCRIPTION

The hexa-braced frame consists of a hexagonal bracing system in which vertical
structural elements (strong column or tie column) in a story connect the V and
inverted-V bracings at the stories below and above that story, respectively. The
tie columns behave like the zipper columns. Chevron braces provide limited
ductility from the brace-intersected beam, such that the beam stiffness deeply
affect the damage distribution [48], [49]. Based on this, the ties are designed
to have enough strength to


ANALYTICAL MODELS

Three types of model buildings 4-, 10-, and 20-story were selected to examine
the structural response of hexa-braced frame for low-, mid-, and high-rise
buildings respectively (Fig. 8). In this research, different types of
hexa-braced frame models were considered based on the different lengths of the
braced bays. Chevron braces and single diagonal braces were used for beam spans
of 9.1 and 6.1 m, respectively. The dead and live loads were considered for
gravity loads as 5 and 2.5 kPa,


MONOTONIC PUSHOVER

The monotonic pushover is applied to estimate the seismic capacity and
progressive failure of the models. In this procedure, the models are subjected
to a monotonic increase of the specified lateral force pattern until the
predetermined story drift is reached. The capacity of the models in terms of
base shear with the response corresponding to the roof drift ratio is reflected
in the pushover curve. The pushover curves obtained for the model structures are
illustrated in Fig. 10.

The pushover


CONCLUSION

This study proposes a new seismic bracing system hexa-braced frame with the
hexagonal configuration of the braced frame. This system develops a conventional
braced framed for the consideration of column moment demand to reduce soft-story
mechanism and damage concentration. The proposed system combines strong
continuous columns with the braces forming hexagonal configuration. Although
beam to column connections are simple, columns can inherently carry moment due
to its configuration. This makes




REFERENCES (64)

 * K.K. Wijesundara et al.
   
   
   MODELING OF DIFFERENT BRACING CONFIGURATIONS IN MULTI-STOREY CONCENTRICALLY
   BRACED FRAMES USING A FIBER-BEAM BASED APPROACH
   
   
   J CONSTR STEEL RES
   
   (2014)
 * E. Brunesi et al.
   
   
   RESPONSE OF PARTIALLY-RESTRAINED BOLTED BEAM-TO-COLUMN CONNECTIONS UNDER
   CYCLIC LOADS
   
   
   J CONSTR STEEL RES
   
   (2014)
 * P.C. Hsiao et al.
   
   
   IMPROVED ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES
   
   
   J CONSTR STEEL RES
   
   (2012)
 * R. Sabelli et al.
   
   
   SEISMIC DEMANDS ON STEEL BRACED FRAME BUILDINGS WITH BUCKLING-RESTRAINED
   BRACES
   
   
   ENG STRUCT
   
   (2003)
 * J. Shen et al.
   
   
   SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES WITH AND WITHOUT BRACE
   BUCKLING
   
   
   ENG STRUCT
   
   (2017)
 * S. Kiggins et al.
   
   
   REDUCING RESIDUAL DRIFT OF BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES AS A DUAL SYSTEM
   
   
   ENG STRUCT
   
   (2006)
 * X. Ji et al.
   
   
   EFFECT OF GRAVITY COLUMNS ON MITIGATION OF DRIFT CONCENTRATION FOR BRACED
   FRAMES
   
   
   J CONSTR STEEL RES
   
   (2009)
 * C.S. Yang et al.
   
   
   DESIGN AND BEHAVIOR OF ZIPPER-BRACED FRAMES
   
   
   ENG STRUCT
   
   (2008)
 * T.T. Soong et al.
   
   
   SUPPLEMENTAL ENERGY DISSIPATION: STATE-OF-THE-ART AND STATE-OF-THE-PRACTICE
   
   
   ENG STRUCT
   
   (2002)
 * L. Gioiella et al.
   
   
   MODAL PROPERTIES AND SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF BUILDINGS EQUIPPED WITH EXTERNAL
   DISSIPATIVE PINNED ROCKING BRACED FRAMES
   
   
   ENG STRUCT
   
   (2018)

B. Qu et al.


NEESR – MITIGATION OF INTER-STORY DRIFT CONCENTRATION IN MULTI-STORY
CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF ROCKING CORES


ENG STRUCT

(2014)
H.U. Lee et al.


PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF TALL BUILDING STRUCTURES WITH A HEXAGRID SYSTEM


PROC ENG

(2017)
M. D’Aniello et al.


THE INFLUENCE OF BEAM STIFFNESS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CHEVRON CONCENTRIC
BRACINGS


J CONSTR STEEL RES

(2015)
J.H. Yoo et al.


INFLUENCE OF CONNECTION DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF BRACED
FRAMES


J CONSTR STEEL RES

(2008)
A. Longo et al.


ON THE USE OF HSS IN SEISMIC-RESISTANT STRUCTURES


J CONSTR STEEL RES

(2014)
S. Santagati et al.


STRAIN LIFE ANALYSIS AT LOW-CYCLE FATIGUE ON CONCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL
STRUCTURES WITH RHS SHAPE BRACES


J EARTHQ ENG

(2012)
K.K. Wijesundara et al.


EQUIVALENT VISCOUS DAMPING FOR STEEL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAME STRUCTURES


BULL EARTHQ ENG

(2011)
Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Rassati GA. Seismic performance of steel MRF with
partially-restrained bolted beam-to-column...AISC. Prequalified connections for
special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications.
ANSI/AISC...J. Osteraas et al.


THE MEXICO EARTHQUAKE OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1985 – BEHAVIOR OF STEEL BUILDINGS


EARTHQ SPECTRA

(1989)
R. Tremblay et al.


PERFORMANCE OF STEEL STRUCTURES DURING THE 1994 NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE


CAN J CIV ENG

(1995)
Rai DC, Goel SC. Seismic evaluation and upgrading of existing steel concentric
braced structures. Report UMCEE 97-03....Khatib IF, Mahin SA, Pister KS. Seismic
behavior of concentrically braced steel frames. UCB/EERC-88/01.
National...Sabelli R. Research on improving the design and analysis of
earthquake-resistant steel-braced frames. 2000 NEHRP...Uriz P, Mahin SA. Toward
earthquake-resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures.
PEER Rep....Sabelli R, Roeder CW, Hajjar JF. Seismic design of steel special
concentrically braced frame systems: a guide for...D.A. Foutch et al.


SEISMIC TESTING OF FULL-SCALE STEEL BUILDING—PART I


J STRUCT ENG

(1987)
Whittaker AS, Uang CM, Bertero VV. An experimental study of the behavior of dual
steel systems. Rep. UCB-EERC-88/14,...R. Tremblay


ACHIEVING A STABLE INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE FOR MULTI-STORY CONCENTRICALLY
BRACED STEEL FRAMES


AISC ENG J

(2003)
Chen CH, Mahin S. Performance-based seismic demand assessment of concentrically
braced steel frame buildings. Rep. No....G.A. MacRae et al.


EFFECT OF COLUMN STIFFNESS ON BRACED FRAME SEISMIC BEHAVIOR


ASCE J STRUCT ENG

(2004)
Tirca L, Tremblay R. Influence of building height and ground motion type on the
seismic behavior of zipper...
View more references


CITED BY (12)


 * PURE-BENDING YIELDING DISSIPATER FOR THE SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF REINFORCED
   CONCRETE BUILDINGS WITH SOFT-STORY IRREGULARITY
   
   2023, Structures
   Show abstract
   
   Removing masonry infill walls from the ground or lower stories of buildings
   to make more open spaces, may lead to forming soft-story structural
   irregularities. Since considering the masonry infill walls as non-structural
   components is a common assumption in the evaluation of the seismic demand of
   buildings, there is a lack of knowledge dealing with the influence of the
   soft-story effect on the seismic response. In this study, the performance of
   4-, 8-, and 12-story moment-resisting reinforced concrete frames with and
   without a ground soft story is compared first. Then, a proposal including the
   use of a yielding dissipater device to retrofit soft-story buildings is
   presented. The low cost, the simple manufacturing technology, and the same
   behavior in tension and compression, which makes the new axial force not
   imposed on the columns, are some of the advantages of this device. In order
   to assess the seismic performance of the proposed system, incremental dynamic
   analysis was conducted on the frames. Five states were considered for each
   frame: (a) bare frame, (b) fully-infilled frame, (c) ground soft-story frame,
   (d) and (e) retrofitted frames with two different configurations of yielding
   dissipater devices in the ground soft story. The responses of the structures
   are compared in terms of capacity curves, progressive damage curves,
   inter-story drifts, and story damage values. The results demonstrate that the
   frames equipped with the yielding dissipater devices experience higher
   lateral load capacity, lower overall damage, lower drift, and a lower damage
   value in the ground story than the soft-story ones.


 * PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND CALCULATION OF ROBUSTNESS OF HIGH-RISE DIAGRID
   TUBE STRUCTURES WITH VARIOUS CONFIGURATIONS
   
   2023, Structures
   Show abstract
   
   Resilience is an appropriate criterion for evaluating the ability of a
   structural system to reduce the probability of damage caused by an event. To
   date, the seismic resilience of novel structural systems such as diagrid
   structures has not been studied. In the present research, the effect of
   various perimeter geometric patterns on the robustness index of diagrid
   structures is evaluated. For this purpose, six diagrid structures of 24 and
   48 stories with perimeter configuration angles of 49°, 67°, and 74° are
   designed. The seismic capacity of the structures is calculated using the
   incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) based on the maximum story drift parameter
   and under near-field earthquakes. Next, the fragility function of these
   structures in limit states are determined based on lognormal statistical
   distribution. Seismic performance levels for diagrid structures are also
   developed. The proposed formulation in the MCEER report is used to calculate
   the loss function of structures. In addition to the structural damage,
   non-structural damage is also considered in estimating the seismic resilience
   of the structures, according to the HAZUS guideline. Furthermore, an
   additional factor is defined in the loss function as an assurance of the
   quality of construction. Finally, the resilience of high-rise buildings with
   diagrid structures is determined for a specific hazard level. The results
   show that diagrid structures have relatively high robustness and using
   perimeter triangular elements can reduce the degradation of structures after
   the earthquake. As observed in the results, considering damage to
   non-structural elements causes a decrease in the quality function of the
   studied structures. It is demonstrated that increasing the perimeter
   configuration angles decreases the robustness index of diagrid structures.
   Based on this analysis results, insufficient knowledge of the quality of
   construction can decline the seismic performance of diagrid structures by up
   to 6%.


 * NON-LINEAR STUDY OF THE METHOD OF TRANSITION IN MIXED CONCRETE/STEEL
   STRUCTURES
   
   2023, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
   Show abstract
   
   A critical zone is formed at the junction of the lower concrete and upper
   steel sections in mixed concrete/steel structures in terms of gravity and
   lateral loads caused by the support reactions of the steel frame. There are
   two common approaches to transition from concrete section to steel one in
   this critical zone: the first is the direct pin connection of the steel frame
   to the concrete frame, and the second is the application of a concrete-steel
   composite story called the transition story. Until now, various studies have
   been conducted on mixed concrete/steel structures, but no study has
   investigated and compared the two mentioned approaches. Considering the
   importance of this issue, 18 models of mixed concrete/steel structures were
   formed in the present study according to the two approaches and the different
   places of connection of the concrete and steel sections along the height of
   the structure. Fragility curves were generated for all models using
   Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) under 44 far-field ground motion records
   and probability function at the complete damage state based on HAZUS
   technical report. A comparison was made from the strength point of view
   considering the two approaches to transition. Next, to investigate the
   non-linear response of the structure at the complete damage state, the Peak
   Inter-Story Drift ratio (PISD) was obtained in the different levels of
   collapse intensity from IDA for different stories. The results showed that
   the application of transition story improves the seismic behavior of mixed
   concrete/steel structures and increases Median Collapse Capacity (MCC) in 7,
   13, and 19-story structures up to 24.63%, 19.54%, and 17.99%, respectively.
   In addition, it makes the displacement of the structure more uniform and
   reduces the significant difference of drift in the critical zone.


 * EVALUATION OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR DUAL STEEL SMF-SCBF SYSTEMS
   USING FEMA P695 METHODOLOGY
   
   2022, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
   Citation Excerpt :
   
   Nevertheless, failure of braces in high-amplitude cyclic loading due to their
   global and local slenderness and the occurrence of low-cycle fatigue is a
   major drawback of SCBFs, which results in a significant reduction in
   stiffness, damage concentration, increased P-Delta effect, increased residual
   drift, and even structural collapse [3–6]. In order to improve the seismic
   performance of conventional SCBF systems, other bracing systems have been
   proposed by researchers, such as buckling-restrained braced frames [7],
   zipper braced frames [5,8], hexa-braced frames [9], and many more [10–12].
   These improved bracing systems prevent buckling, damage concentration, and
   soft story formation through appropriate distribution of the seismic demand
   among all stories of a building.
   
   Show abstract
   
   The present study evaluates the seismic performance factors of typical
   buildings with dual lateral force resisting system (LFRS) consisting of
   special moment frames (SMFs) combined with special concentrically braced
   frames (SCBFs) using FEMA P695 methodology. For this purpose, six building
   archetypes with 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 16- and 20-stories, in two short- and
   long-period performance groups were analyzed by the response spectrum method
   and designed based on the requirements of ASCE 7–16 and AISC 341–16.
   Validated nonlinear models were developed for each building in the OpenSees
   software platform. Then, the static and dynamic behavior of each building was
   investigated up to the collapse stage by nonlinear static analyses and
   nonlinear time history analyses under 44 far-field ground motions of FEMA
   P695. In this investigation, the peak and residual drift ratios, hysteresis
   behavior of the stories during the earthquake, collapse fragility curves, and
   seismic performance parameters (R, Ω, and Cd) were obtained and discussed.
   The results of nonlinear analyses demonstrated that code-compliant long
   period dual SMF-SCBFs (16 stories or higher) performed poorly and can be
   severely damaged in strong earthquakes.


 * DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF SOFT-STOREY STRUCTURES WITH GAP ELEMENTS AT
   BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS
   
   2022, Materials Today: Proceedings
   Citation Excerpt :
   
   Rodrigues, H. et al. [4] conducted experiments on RC jacketing for the soft
   storey and found it useful in reducing soft storey effects, but if not
   executed properly, it leads to monolithic behaviour of the element under
   lateral loading. Mashhadiali and Kheyroddin [3] proposed an innovative
   Hexa-braced frame system for the improvement of seismic response. They found
   that its structural behaviour achieved the goal of uniform distribution of
   lateral deformation.
   
   Show abstract
   
   Soft-storey structures are more susceptible to failure for seismic
   vibrations, which is well-known to the world. But, in multi-storey
   apartments, it is a practice to provide a parking place at the ground storey,
   inducing soft-storey effects. In the present study, an effort is made to
   reduce the soft-storey effect on the structure's dynamic performance by
   introducing an arrangement of gap elements at beam-column joints. To that
   context, a numerical assessment is carried out to check the performance of
   the RC structure. The gap element is modelled as a spring either in a beam or
   in a column or both.
   
   The research has been performed in two parts; the first part of the analysis
   is focused on optimizing the gap element pattern. Diagonal compressive struts
   replace the infill walls, and the ground storey is modelled as an open ground
   storey without infill walls, which is considered a soft-storey. From the
   first part, an optimal gap element pattern from five different arbitrary
   patterns is obtained from the results of linear dynamic response spectrum
   analysis, depending upon the comparison of various seismic parameters. The
   second part of the analysis involves checking the effect of the gap element's
   optimized pattern for four levels of structures with vertically varied aspect
   ratios. Response spectrum analysis is performed, and a study is conducted to
   compare the seismic parameters for the four levels. The models with gap
   elements have shown an apparent reduction in storey displacements,
   inter-storey drift ratios, over-turning moments, and increment in storey
   stiffness when compared to the conventional models, thus exhibiting
   constructive outcomes.


 * SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF TOWER CRANE MAST TYPES WITH DIFFERENT BRACING
   CONFIGURATIONS
   
   2021, Structures
   Citation Excerpt :
   
   Goel and Tang [33] studied the seismic behavior of a steel building that had
   inverted V-braced frames in order to question the relation between design
   forces and frame ductility. Mashhadiali and Kheyroddin [34] used several
   building models to study on developing a new braced frame type for
   improvement of seismic performance. Nayak et al. [35] investigated the
   seismic performance of X-braced frames and diamond braced frames for 3-story
   building by doing pushover analysis.
   
   Show abstract
   
   Tower cranes, which are composed of a lattice structure, are mostly used to
   transport heavy materials and equipment in construction sites. The delicate
   structure of tower cranes and operating conditions make them very sensitive
   to dynamic excitation such as instant overload for any reason caused by
   transported material or wind and earthquake effect. This study was carried
   out for investigating the seismic performance of tower crane mast types with
   different kinds of bracing configurations. A program with respect to finite
   element method was written in MATLAB which is capable of meshing, modal
   analysis, and transient analysis. While nodal coordinates, material
   information, cross-section data, and the orientation of cross-section for
   each element in the structure and earthquake motion in the time domain are
   used for input data in the program, natural frequencies, mode shapes, mass
   participation factors of the structure and displacement, velocity and
   acceleration response of each node are obtained as output parameters. In this
   research, different types of mast frames were designed in terms of the most
   commonly used bracing configuration and were used in modal and transient
   analysis using two different earthquake motion inputs. The seismic
   performance of each mast type was determined in the time domain in terms of
   dynamic response characteristics.

View all citing articles on Scopus


RECOMMENDED ARTICLES (6)

 * Research article
   
   
   A FEASIBILITY OF ENHANCING THE IMPACT STRENGTH OF NOVEL LAYERED TWO STAGE
   FIBROUS CONCRETE SLABS
   
   Engineering Structures, Volume 175, 2018, pp. 41-49
   Show abstract
   
   This study pioneers the concept of a novel layered two stage fibrous concrete
   (LTSFC) subjected to falling weight collision. The LTSFC is a newly developed
   concrete, with unique combination of steel fibres and coarse aggregates that
   are premixed and preplaced in the formwork in three layers followed by a
   flowable grout injection in each layer to fill the voids. In this study, some
   LTSFC slabs were proposed to consider the combined effect of layered and two
   stage concrete containing different type and combinations of steel fibres.
   Nine slabs were proposed, casted and tested, for which firstly the LTSFC were
   prepared and reinforced in three layers of 4%, 2% and 4% with three different
   fibres viz., crimped fibre (CF), hooked end fibre (HF), combined CF and HF
   and combined long and short CF. Secondly, the slabs were reinforced with 3.3%
   of same type of steel fibres over the entire cross section. The average
   amount of fibre used in LTSFC specimen was 3.3% which is similar to the fibre
   dosage used in the second series, where the fibres are equally spread in
   entire cross section. The study parameters viz., number of repeated impacts
   that induce the first crack and failure, impact ductility ratio, crack
   resistance (service and ultimate) and impact crack resistance ratio were
   considered herein. The results indicated that LTSFC specimens exhibited
   significant increase in the number of repeated impacts for the initial crack
   and failure to occur, high crack resistance, enhanced ductility and impact
   crack resistance ratio when related with non-fibrous concrete. Hence, the
   most significant findings of this research should stimulate innovation and
   new technology to develop the novel LTSFC in future studies.

 * Research article
   
   
   BASE-ISOLATION SYSTEMS FOR THE SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF R.C. FRAMED BUILDINGS
   WITH SOFT-STOREY SUBJECTED TO NEAR-FAULT EARTHQUAKES
   
   Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Volume 109, 2018, pp. 209-221
   Show abstract
   
   More studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the base-isolation
   in seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete (r.c.) framed structures in
   the case of masonry infills (MIs) not uniformly distributed in elevation.
   Moreover, amplification of the inelastic demand is generally expected for
   base-isolated structures located in a near-fault area, in the event of
   long-duration velocity pulses. In order to understand the nonlinear seismic
   behaviour of masonry-infilled base-isolated r.c. framed structures, first a
   six-storey r.c. framed building is primarily designed (as fixed-base) in
   compliance with a former Italian seismic code, for a medium-risk zone. Then
   it is retrofitted by the insertion of a base-isolation system with
   elastomeric and sliding bearings to meet the requirements of the current
   Italian code, in a high-risk seismic zone. Failure mechanisms of totally and
   partly infilled structures are compared by considering three structural
   models: (i) bare structure with nonstructural MIs; (ii) infilled structure
   with in-elevation uniform distribution of structural MIs; (iii) infilled
   structure with in-elevation uneven distribution of structural MIs. Nonlinear
   dynamic analysis of the original (fixed-base) and retrofitted (base-isolated)
   structures is carried out by a lumped plasticity model describing the
   inelastic behaviour of the r.c. frame members, while nonlinear
   force-displacement laws are considered for the elastomeric and sliding
   bearings. A pivot hysteretic model is assumed to predict the nonlinear
   force-displacement law of the equivalent diagonal strut adopted for modelling
   the MIs. Finally, near-fault ground motions with significant horizontal
   pulses are selected and scaled on the basis of the design hypotheses adopted
   for the test structures.

 * Research article
   
   
   ASSESSING COLLAPSE SAFETY OF CBF BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO CRUSTAL AND
   SUBDUCTION EARTHQUAKES
   
   Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Volume 115, 2015, pp. 47-61
   Show abstract
   
   The study described in this paper investigated the effects of a mega-thrust
   subduction earthquake on the seismic performance of moderately ductile
   concentrically braced frame multi-storey office buildings (MD–CBF) located on
   Site Class C in Victoria, B.C., Canada. Using data from the 2011 Mw9 Tohoku
   subduction earthquake in Japan and worldwide crustal earthquakes, nonlinear
   dynamic analyses were performed on detailed numerical models developed in the
   OpenSees framework. It was found that the effect of Trifunac duration on the
   nonlinear seismic response of 4-storey, 8-storey and 12-storey MD–CBF office
   buildings is particularly significant in terms of the strain accumulated in
   the fibers of hollow structural section braces causing low-cycle fatigue
   fracture. In addition, assessment of the likelihood of collapse safety of the
   studied multi-storey MD–CBF buildings found that the collapse margin ratio
   (CMR) value and the adjusted collapse margin ratio (ACMR) value are
   approximately 150% greater under the crustal record set than under the
   subduction record set. Among the three buildings studied, only the 12-storey
   MD–CBF building subjected to the subduction record set failed to meet the
   collapse safety criterion of ACMR > ACMR10%. Consequently, the CMR value
   needs to be increased by strengthening the structural system. Therefore,
   particular attention should be given when designing MD–CBF multi-storey
   buildings located in the proximity of subduction fault, such as buildings in
   Victoria that lie within the Cascadia subduction zone.

 * Research article
   
   
   STRENGTH AND DUCTILITY TYPE RETROFIT OF SOFT-FIRST-STORY RC FRAMES THROUGH
   THE STEEL-JACKETED NON-REINFORCED THICK HYBRID WALL
   
   Engineering Structures, Volume 186, 2019, pp. 255-269
   Show abstract
   
   In this paper, a new technique is proposed for retrofitting low-rise
   soft-first-story reinforced concrete buildings. The proposed retrofitting
   technique is called “Thick Hybrid Wall”. In this method, channel-shaped steel
   plates jacket boundary RC columns of a bare frame. The steel plates are
   extended to the bay of the frame through the additional steel plates
   connected together with the help of bolts. Then, additional concrete is cast
   in the provided steel formworks. To verify the efficiency of the proposed
   technique, one non-retrofitted specimen and four retrofitted specimens were
   tested under cyclic horizontal loading and constant axial forces. The
   observed experimental results determined that the thick hybrid walls not only
   increase the lateral strength and stiffness of the frames, but also
   considerably improve the lateral ductility. In addition to obtaining superior
   structural performance, the proposed method provides ease in construction at
   a building site, and minimizes the vibration, noise, and concrete dust of the
   retrofitting operation. The proposed method has the potential of significant
   reduction in construction costs of retrofitting existing buildings.

 * Research article
   
   
   MECHANISMS IN TWO-STORY X-BRACED FRAMES
   
   Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Volume 106, 2015, pp. 258-277
   Show abstract
   
   This paper presents a study to reveal actual mechanisms and seismic loading
   patterns on the braced-intersected beams in two-story X-braced frames
   (X-braced frames) and discusses the impacts of yielding beams on critical
   components, such as braces and connections. First, the seismic response of
   various X-braced frames with different heights and design assumptions is
   presented to observe actual mechanisms and seismic load patterns on weak and
   strong beams during earthquake ground motions. Then the simulations with
   finite element method are presented to help understand the mechanisms
   observed in the seismic response of the X-braced frames. The paper concludes
   that (1) the first-mode mechanism in multi-story concentrically braced
   frames, anticipated by AISC 341, is a rare occasion and leads to light
   sections for brace-intersected beams in X-braced frames that most likely
   undergo significant inelastic deformation; (2) yielding of the
   brace-intersected beam alters the mechanism in many ways, which, in turn,
   further increases inelastic deformation in the beam; (3) vertical inelastic
   displacement at beam middle span causes significantly additional ductility
   demand on braces, gusset plates, and beam-to-column connections that are not
   considered in current design practice; and (4) inelastic deformation of
   brace-intersected beams results in the redistribution of the total input
   energy demand among the components of the X-braced frame, adversely
   increasing the demand on fracture-prone components such as braces and gusset
   plates.

 * Research article
   
   
   SEISMIC ASSESSMENT FOR TYPICAL SOFT-STOREY REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES IN
   BUCHAREST, ROMANIA
   
   International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Volume 41, 2019, Article
   101332
   Show abstract
   
   In this study, a seismic assessment is performed for a low-code high-rise
   soft-storey reinforced concrete (RC) structure typical for Bucharest,
   Romania. One such RC structure collapsed in Bucharest during the March 1977
   Vrancea intermediate-depth earthquake. Most of these structures were not
   retrofitted after the 1977 seismic event, they have been poorly maintained
   and have been affected by two additional Vrancea seismic events in 1986 and
   1990. As such, considering that they are still inhabited by many Bucharest
   residents, the seismic assessment of these structures is an urgent matter.
   Consequently, a fragility analysis based on the results of typical pushover
   analyses, as well as based on incremental dynamic analyses is performed
   firstly. Moreover, a detailed sectional analysis regarding the seismic
   capacity of the vertical structural elements situated at the ground storey is
   also performed and highlights the brittle seismic behaviour of many RC
   vertical structural elements. The analyses also show that the structure has a
   larger strength in the transversal direction, but the displacement capacity
   is about half that for the longitudinal direction. Finally, the mean annual
   collapse probabilities computed using the ground motions from a Monte-Carlo
   simulated earthquake catalogue for the Vrancea intermediate-depth seismic
   source have the same order of magnitude on both principal directions of the
   structure, an observation confirmed by damage data collected after the 1977
   Vrancea earthquake.


View full text
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
 * About ScienceDirect
 * Remote access
 * Shopping cart
 * Advertise
 * Contact and support
 * Terms and conditions
 * Privacy policy

We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and
ads. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies.

All content on this site: Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and
contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining,
AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the Creative
Commons licensing terms apply.