brucemulkey.com Open in urlscan Pro
69.163.217.1  Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

GET https://brucemulkey.com/

<form class="responsive-searchform" method="get" action="https://brucemulkey.com/">
  <input type="text" class="text-input" value="" name="s" id="s" placeholder="Search..">
  <i><input value="" type="submit"><svg class="mk-svg-icon" data-name="mk-icon-search" data-cacheid="icon-63ed9654d8924" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1664 1792"><path d="M1152 832q0-185-131.5-316.5t-316.5-131.5-316.5 131.5-131.5 316.5 131.5 316.5 316.5 131.5 316.5-131.5 131.5-316.5zm512 832q0 52-38 90t-90 38q-54 0-90-38l-343-342q-179 124-399 124-143 0-273.5-55.5t-225-150-150-225-55.5-273.5 55.5-273.5 150-225 225-150 273.5-55.5 273.5 55.5 225 150 150 225 55.5 273.5q0 220-124 399l343 343q37 37 37 90z"></path></svg></i>
</form>

GET https://brucemulkey.com/

<form method="get" id="mk-fullscreen-searchform" action="https://brucemulkey.com/">
  <input type="text" value="" name="s" id="mk-fullscreen-search-input">
  <i class="fullscreen-search-icon"><svg class="mk-svg-icon" data-name="mk-icon-search" data-cacheid="icon-63ed9654e5aac" style=" height:25px; width: 23.214285714286px; " xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1664 1792"><path d="M1152 832q0-185-131.5-316.5t-316.5-131.5-316.5 131.5-131.5 316.5 131.5 316.5 316.5 131.5 316.5-131.5 131.5-316.5zm512 832q0 52-38 90t-90 38q-54 0-90-38l-343-342q-179 124-399 124-143 0-273.5-55.5t-225-150-150-225-55.5-273.5 55.5-273.5 150-225 225-150 273.5-55.5 273.5 55.5 225 150 150 225 55.5 273.5q0 220-124 399l343 343q37 37 37 90z"></path></svg></i>
</form>

Text Content

 * 
 * 
 * 


 * Home
 * Purpose
 * Essays
 * Praise
 * Contact





 * Home
 * Purpose
 * Essays
 * Praise
 * Contact





TALKING THE 2016 POST-ELECTION BLUES


 




TALKING THE 2016 POST-ELECTION BLUES

By Bruce Mulkey
 Posted November 28, 2016
 In Reclaiming Democracy, Shifting cultural paradigm
Talking the 2016 post-election
blues2016-11-282017-01-12https://brucemulkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/mulkey.pngBruce
Mulkeyhttps://brucemulkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/wall-mirror.jpg200px200px
2
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 




On a warm Texas morning on Wednesday, November 3, 1948, I remember my mom, Sue
Mulkey, a life-long Democrat, gleefully asking our next-door neighbor, “Well,
how do you like our new president?” Defying the predictions of almost every
pundit and pollster, President Harry Truman, who had succeeded to the presidency
when FDR died, had won a full term, defeating Republican challenger Thomas Dewey
in what some considered one of the greatest political upsets in American
history. It was especially astounding when you consider that two Democratic
factions split from the party: Henry Wallace, former vice president under FDR,
ran as the Progressive Party’s presidential candidate, and Strom Thurman,
governor of South Carolina, headed the Dixiecrat ticket. Sixty-eight years
later, an electoral shockwave that would dwarf Truman’s surprising victory was
unfolding before my eyes.

As I watched the returns start to trickle in on election night with my wife
Shonnie and our friend Carolyn, I kept saying, “The votes in the Democratic
strongholds obviously haven’t come in yet. It’s just a matter of time before
Hillary takes the lead in Florida.” But she didn’t. Not in Florida, nor in
Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Michigan, or Wisconsin. Given that almost all the
polls had consistently shown Clinton leading, it was difficult to believe what
was happening right before my eyes.

Disconsolate, I went to bed around midnight after it was clear that Donald Trump
was on his way to becoming our next president. I woke up around 3:00 a.m. and
fumbled around with my Kindle to see if a miracle had taken place, if some of
the battleground states had flipped to the Democratic column. They hadn’t.

Let me be clear. I voted for Bernie Sanders in the North Carolina primary when
hope was still alive that he could capture the Democratic nomination for
president. I supported Sanders because I believed (and still believe) that he
understood the necessity of addressing issues such as income inequality, lack of
a living wage for many, our two-tiered justice system, institutional racism, the
militarization of our police departments, world-wide militarism (800 military
bases in more than 70 countries and territories abroad), government surveillance
of U.S. citizens, and climate change.

In contrast, it’s evident to me that, over the past several decades, the
Democratic establishment has tilted considerably to the right, and their chosen
candidate, Hillary Clinton, qualified as she might be, epitomized that position
on the political spectrum. Nowhere near the Republicans’ shift to the far right,
but to the right of center nonetheless. Furthermore, Clinton’s sense of
entitlement (It’s my turn.), the Clinton dynasty (So, now Chelsea is being
groomed to run for Congress.), the Clinton’s relentless pursuit of the almighty
dollar (current net worth estimated at over $100 million), and the DNC’s
manipulations before and during the Democratic primaries to deliver the
nomination to Clinton all made it challenging for me to get behind the
Democratic candidate.

Nonetheless, I refrained from criticizing Hillary during the general election
campaign and voted for her during early voting at my local precinct in
Asheville, North Carolina, though to be honest, mine was more a vote against
Trump than a vote for Clinton. But what the hell, I thought, let’s elect a
woman. We’re way past due. In addition, of course, I voted for the down-ticket
Democrats, including Roy Cooper, North Carolina’s Governor-elect, and our local
candidates for the state house and senate, Buncombe County Commission, and
Register of Deeds, all of whom won.

Since Trump has been declared the winner, my world has seemed surreal. I keep
waking in the morning and remembering the election (“Holy shit, we really
elected Trump?”) much as, a few decades ago, I’d awaken up after an evening of
serious drinking: (“Damn, I didn’t really say that, did I?”) I remembered
Sinclair Lewis’s book It Can’t Happen Here, a novel written during the Great
Depression about the tenuousness of democracy and how fascism could rear its
ugly head in America. I fell into a funk from which I still haven’t fully
recovered.

I’m amazed at how many folks believe that President-elect Donald Trump is
brimming with high self-esteem. He is not. What Donald Trump demonstrates is
pseudo-self-esteem. He unconsciously hides his fears, insecurities, and
self-doubt behind a façade of hyper-masculinity, aggressiveness, belligerence,
and hostility. If one were to strip away his macho mask, you’d find a scared
little boy, albeit in the body of a man, who is unable to hear any thoughts that
run counter to his, who meets resistance by striking back, who judges others as
unworthy or less than him in order to conceal his deep fear that he himself is
unworthy, incompetent, or even unlovable. Anyone or any action that might reveal
his vulnerability will be met with ridicule, contempt, or even violence.

Of course, at his core, Trump is neither the blustering demagogue nor the
frightened child. He is human. He is one of us. And while it may be easy to
castigate Trump for his extremes, we can nonetheless acknowledge his humanity,
while standing with people of color, women, LGBT people, Muslims, immigrants,
the disabled, and other minorities.

Nonetheless, in the midst of all of this, I sometimes find myself wondering if
it really matters who the president of the United States is. Yes, the president
has the bully pulpit, and beginning in 2017, a bona fide bully will occupy that
pulpit. But much of what goes on in this nation does so despite who the
president is.

A 2014 Princeton study that reviewed more than twenty years of data (that
includes measures of the key variables for 1,779 policy issues) indicates that
political leaders of both major political parties listen to the economic elites,
business interests, and people who can afford lobbyists (all entities that fund
their re-election campaigns) rather than the citizens who elected them.
According to the study:

> The preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule,
> near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.

We live in an oligarchy, a country run by the economic elite. No matter how
popular a measure might be with the bottom ninety-percent of income earners in
America, no matter which party holds the presidency or a majority in Congress,
issues that are popular with the public—such as federally-funded healthcare
insurance for all Americans, regulating the prices of life-saving drugs, job
creation, and effectively dealing with global warming, among others—never see
the light of day. Our government apparently doesn’t care what you think. Not
unless you are willing to contribute excessive amounts of money to a
politician’s campaign, an action that is tantamount to legalized bribery.

In such a system, do you really think Congress, regardless of which political
party holds a majority, will take action to actually deal with income
inequality? To eliminate institutional racism? To provide our schools with the
resources necessary to give our children a first-rate education? To support
parents, especially during their children’s early years? To rein in military
spending and our overseas misadventures? To effectively curb climate change?

The 2016 election has exposed the impotence of our two major political
parties—one which nominated a reality TV star, a man-child who would be king,
the natural consequence of the Republicans’ decades-long practice of using
bigotry and intolerance to court their adherents, and by doing so, exposed the
dark underbelly of America—the racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, and
Islamophobia—long denied. The other party refused to discern the mood of the
electorate and nominated a candidate out of tune with the times primarily
because she was next in line. The election also revealed the mainstream media,
which covered Trump’s every move no matter how disgusting and wrote off Sanders
early on as a kooky old socialist with wild hair, as a tentacle of the ruling
elite that values stockholder profits over true journalism.

Perhaps this is the wake-up call many of us needed to awaken from our
trance-like state, to disavow the bread and circuses, to abandon our quest for
the next new shiny thing, to finally grasp that the ruling elite keeps us
fighting among ourselves over table scraps while they make out like bandits.
Perhaps it’s time to comprehend that no one on the white horse is coming to save
us (no, not even Bernie), that we’re all in this together, that we must take
responsibility for our lives and our communities, that it’s time for decisive
action, not merely posting anti-Trump memes on Facebook.

Before we move into action, however, it’s important that we take time to grieve,
to process our hurt and anger, to nurture ourselves and those closest to us.
Then, once we’re ready, I believe that we begin in our own neighborhoods by
offering support to those who need it and being there for one another—helping
the elderly couple unload their groceries, giving a neighbor’s child a ride to
school, shoveling snow from the neighborhood sidewalks, and so on. Next, we move
into our communities, joining and otherwise supporting groups and organizations
that are working to create a stronger and more resilient society, that
understand there is much more that connects us than divides us, that are working
to build bridges between races and classes, that are more interested in working
for the common good than protecting their own turf. Check out “8 Steps To
Organize Against Trump — Starting Now” for more details on how to do this.

Specifically, if you’re a woman, consider traveling to D.C. for the Million
Woman March on January 21, 2017. In addition, Robert Reich has called for a
national strike on January 20, the day of Trump’s inauguration—a day on which we
don’t go to work, we don’t buy anything. For additional ideas, check out Reich’s
The First 100 Day Resistance Agenda. Finally, we must stand steadfastly with
people of color, women, LGBTQ people, Muslims, immigrants, the disabled, and
other minorities who will be most vulnerable to discrimination, bigotry, and
hate under the Trump regime. We must let it be known that we will not tolerate
injustice toward any group, and we must, when called to do so, take in action
with undeniable passion and in numbers so massive that they simply cannot be
ignored.




Bruce Mulkey
Doing my best to keep up with a high-spirited eleven-year-old on the footpaths
of the Appalachians.
 * 
 * 


Recent Posts
 * 
   I Was a Teenage Volunteer!
 * 
   Memories of My Longtime Friend Stewart Horn
 * 
   A Gradual Reawakening: Letting go of my world-weary blues and connecting with
   reality . . . again
 * 
   All alone in the forest . . . yet not alone at all


Showing 2 comments
 * Bob Lantis December 2, 2016
   
   
   You’ve so well expressed my own sentiments on what is our opportunity, or
   more so, the impetus, for the creation of an enormous and now essential
   change in our society. Thanks for this, Bruce; I am sharing your essay.
   
   
   * Bruce Mulkey December 2, 2016
     
     
     Thanks a lot, Bob!
     
     
     
   




© 2018. Bruce Mulkey.




Start typing and press Enter to search