www.leftrightforward.net Open in urlscan Pro
208.113.185.33  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

See also:
Justice4Assange.com
Quick easy action links:
Act4Assange.com

Supporters of LeftRightForward's aims:
Victor Tiffany of Citizens Against Plutocracy

> LeftRightForward.Net


Anti-Establishment Left & Anti-Establishment Right Unite:
   
   
 * Draft petition: Left and Right Unite against Endless War and the Deep State!
   
   

 * Rough Draft of what could be broken off as both conclusion and a starting
   with a segment that is Part II:
   Joint Statement: Left and Right Unite on TRADE. (For Fair Trade!)
   
   

 * Investing in Infrastructure
   
   Excerpted from lower down on this page:
   
   > "If this matches who you are and your motivation and pragmatic and win-win
   > and civil style, contact us at econdemocracy which is on the well known
   > gmail site."
   
   Please read on below for details..


New: To Save the World, We Need to Save America First — with Patriotic Solar (at
another website)

NEW: Short excerpt from Caitlin Johnstone's Left Vs. Right Is A Nonsensical
Debate As Long As There's A Deep State
(Jan 2017 summary by Lori Wallach we posted for folks on gab.)





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LeftRightForward.Net
The non-Establishment, regular folk, grassroots,
Left and Right working together in areas
where we agree to help America move Forward
 I.   Fair Trade: Links to anti-TPP and related links, coming
 II.  Jobs not Endless Wars Links to work to end our funding of Extremist
      Islamic terrorist groups in Syria (Rep. Gabbard's bill)
 III. Links to ending the neocon nightmares of Endless Wars/Regime Change
      sucking our tax-dollars, enriching weapons contractors, sending our men
      and women to die & be wounded in wars for oil, for empire and based on
      lies.
 IV.  Links to joint Left-and-Right Unite activism/Petitions/Demonstrations

Hello fellow Americans who may disagree in some areas but who not only agree
about issues very important to our nation's future (anti-TPP, and no more wars
for oil, "regime change", for Empire, or for the military-industrial profiteers
to take $Trillions of dollars away from our public programs ("L" angle) *and*
our taxes ("R" angle) but also who are active online.

If it were "just" these two issues, it would already be important enough to
cooperate! They are huge - in costing literally hundreds of billions to
trillions of dollars not to mention lives of our men and women in uniform, not
to mention the cost to those who live and their families (PTSD etc). But there
may be other issues L and R agree on - even if for different reasons, like
politician-mandated No Child Left Behind and it's "sibling" laws, whether you're
a former Bush Administration Republican who now speaks out against the
for-profit deliberately set-up-for-failure privatization of our schools ("L"
though formerly a "R" person!) or about mandated "PC" in the schools ("R" angle)
there is definitely common ground. Let's not fool ourselves, even on "smaller"
issues like school it's high stakes, and we'll still disagree on D, E, F even
when we agree on A, B, and C.

So let's work together on A, B and C then, our education system and our kids
demand it! And equally on anti-TPP, end to Endless War military-industrial
complex that Republican President Eisenhower warned [link see here us about,
among other areas!

> This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms
> industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic,
> political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every
> office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this
> development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications.Our
> toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of
> our society.
> 
> In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of
> unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial
> complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and
> will persist.
> 
> We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or
> democratic processes [Turning into the world's rogue superpower Empire, with
> endless wars for profit! -ED] We should take nothing for granted. Only an
> alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge
> industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and
> goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
> 
> Public Papers of the Presidents, Republican President [and General of the
> Army] Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960, p. 1035- 1040

And this from an Army General and at the time, a Republican U.S. president
speaking to the American people:

> Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies,
> in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who
> are cold and are not clothed.
> 
> This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of
> its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The
> cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30
> cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000
> population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles
> of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter with a half-million bushels
> of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed
> more than 8,000 people. . . . This is not a way of life at all, in any true
> sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross
> of iron.[1][5]

That was April 16, 1953 by a Republican president and military man, Eisenhower,
opposing war and militarism for the sake of militarism and only as needed for
defense in the Cold War which should be ended as soon as possible given it's
costs, human and financial, as well as it's dangers and risks of global
holocaust. Today it would take far less courage because there is no USSR, and we
are only talking about speaking out against something far more vicious: an
endless for-profit terrorism-increasing privately controlled "game" of empire at
the cost of American citizens as well as civilians around the world yet neither
"left" nor "right" Establishment wants to act against it, let alone end it, and
to the extent one outsider spoke out against it (DT) the Neocon war hawks, those
chicken-hawks are rushing to back a completely corrupt dangerous candidate (HC)
more than happy and even eager to make Reagan look like a pacifist by
comparison, even at the cost of thousands of lives and billions to trillions
(Yes, Trillion$ already sunk on Iraq! say Nobel prize winning economist in work
join with Harvard professor!...let alone going forward adding to that!)

I even have some thoughts on common ground between us "leftists" and
conservatives on immigration, that both establishment right, and even DT, don't
talk about, and establishment liberals don't talk and don't WANT to talk about,
that is a powerful starting-point, at least I'm crazy enough to think so :-)
Stay tuned!

LeftRightForward after the election? Work together to resist bi-partisan
destructive work by elite insider Establishment politicians to push forward,
sneak in, or ram down our throats the TPP, whether resisting such moves by a
President HRC or if President DT, to keep president DT's feet to the fire to
demand, insist, make sure, he does not U-turn, because the Powers That Be will
put tremendous pressure on him, even try to blackmail him (they DID blackmail
Bernie Sanders [link1] who even warned us to ignore what he might later be
forced to say [link/meme 2 and 3 here].



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



We're Seeking: Polite, civil, cooperative Trump (and fellow former Bernie/Jill)
voters who are both principled/idealist and also at the same time, pragmatic: we
can have separate petitions, marches, whatever, where we disagree; but we're
looking for those who wish to cooperate and work together -- "Left and Right
Unite!" for victory -- in those areas we agree: for Fair Trade, against
NAFTA/TPP, against the endless Neocon Agenda of endless Regime Change Wars*,
possibly other areas too like drug prices and infrastructure especially win-win
for rural jobs- boosting Patriotically-FOREVER-lasting 100% American renewable
energy)...but let's start with A)Trade and with B) ENDING the jihadist-helping,
trillions of tax-dollar wasting, veteran killing/disabling endless wars first...

If this matches who you are and your motivation and pragmatic and win-win and
civil style, contact us at econdemocracy which is on the well known gmail site.

*Kudos for Dem. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard for her constructive meeting with President
Trump on especially ending our programs which try to overthrow the Syrian
government and which arm fake "moderate rebel" groups which don't really exist,
thus really arming Jidahist terrorist groups helping ISIS, Al Qaeda, and global
radical terrorist groups grow.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our other (pre-election) websites:

 * LesserEvil2016.com
       Sub-sections:
    1. Civil rights & Minority rights: Which candidate's done more damage?
    2. Women's rights: Which candidate's done more damage?
    3. Treatment of Muslims and Arabs: Which candidate is worse? Who's done
       (far) more damage?
    4. Just who is the bigger Threat to world peace?
    5. Yes, let's talk about Bigotry. You'd better sit down for this.. This
       isn't from some right-wing blog.. It's the BBC & UK Guardian; Three top
       Clinton aides testified!
    6. Who's done more harm to immigrants?
       Immigrants, Refugees: Insulting vs. killing them Mean talk vs. Funding
       Coups which kill Latin@s & create refugees
       
       
   
    7. Plus -- TPP: Assault on Democracy; Which voting choices really makes one
       "privileged"?
    8. Two Kinds of Fascism: DT's Personal, HRC's Institutional, which is more
       dangerous?
    9. And: Why you should vote for Jill Stein.
   
   

 * HillaryAntisemitism.com see Documentary 2-3 minute clip from UK's BBC!
   
   New: Hillary Clinton N-word Dossier