dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com Open in urlscan Pro
2a00:1450:4001:808::2001  Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

Name: mc-embedded-subscribe-form — POST http://blogspot.us7.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=e61dd718ddfee51c578fbea2f&id=03c4fee4b9

<form action="http://blogspot.us7.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=e61dd718ddfee51c578fbea2f&amp;id=03c4fee4b9" method="post" id="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" name="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" class="validate" target="_blank" novalidate="">
  <label for="mce-EMAIL">Subscribe to our mailing list</label>
  <input type="email" value="" name="EMAIL" class="email" id="mce-EMAIL" placeholder="email address" required="">
  <div class="clear"><input type="submit" value="Subscribe" name="subscribe" id="mc-embedded-subscribe" class="button"></div>
</form>

https://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/search

<form action="https://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/search" class="gsc-search-box" target="_top">
  <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="gsc-search-box">
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td class="gsc-input">
          <input autocomplete="off" class="gsc-input" name="q" size="10" title="search" type="text" value="">
        </td>
        <td class="gsc-search-button">
          <input class="gsc-search-button" title="search" type="submit" value="Search">
        </td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</form>

Text Content

30 APRIL 2023


ABOUT THE NEW SKEPTIC'S ANNOTATED BIBLE WEBSITE



Unless you've just visiting the Skeptic's Annotated Bible website for the first
time, you've probably noticed that it has changed recently. The content is the
the same, at least for the most part, although I add and revise its content each
day. But it's no longer just a bunch of html files. It's now a database-driven
site, which is a whole nother thing entirely.

With the site in a database, I no longer have to create, manage, and separately
maintain tens of thousands of html files. It also allows me to present the site
in ways that would have been difficult or impossible to do previously. And now
that I don't have to spend so much time with housekeeping, I can spend more time
adding content and presenting it in new and (hopefully) more useful and
interesting ways.

Although the site functions much the same as it did before, there are a few
things that we've added or changed that I should tell you about.

 * We've added a context sensitive search to the pages that allow you to search
   on the part of the site that is relevant to the page you are on.
   
   For example, it you are on the Bible homepage, the default is to search the
   text of the King James Version of the Bible. It will also find results for
   Bible trivia questions, Every Jot and Tittle, and other Bible-related
   content. If you are on the Quran homepage, the search will be for Quran, etc.
   And by using the advanced search, you can search whichever parts of the site
   you are interested in.
   
   The search box can always be found by clicking on the hamburger menu icon on
   the top right corner of the page.

 * Most of the pages on the site allow comments. To do so, login with a username
   and password or by signing in with your Google account.
   
   Comments can be used to ask questions, make suggestions, let me know about
   corrections that need to be made, and discuss the page's content with others
   at the website. I will try to read, review, and reply to the comments in a
   timely manner.

 * The text for the Bible in Fewer Words podcast episodes can be found on the
   site by clicking on the Text and notes for episodes link. I encourage
   listeners to read along with us on these pages as we do the podcasts.

 * The category icons on right column of each chapter can be clicked to display
   the category list for that chapter. As on the old site, a complete list for
   the book can be found by clicking on the category icons on the book's outline
   pages.

 * Many of the blog posts from Dwindling in Unbelief have been copied to the new
   blog. For now, I will try to post at both sites - at least until it seems
   that most visitors are aware of the new SAB blog here.

Please let me know if you have any comments, questions, or concerns about the
new site.


Posted by Steve Wells 0 comments





15 APRIL 2023


SO IT WAS JESUS WHO SENT THE FIERY SERPENTS IN NUMBERS 21!



One of the craziest stories in the Bible is found in Numbers 21. It all happens
in just two verses:

> The people spake against God, and against Moses, Wherefore have ye brought us
> up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness? for there is no bread, neither is
> there any water; and our soul loatheth this light bread.
> 
> And the LORD sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people;
> and much people of Israel died. Numbers 21:5-6

Christians don't pay much attention to it, though. That was, after all, the Old
Testament, and they ignore pretty much everything in it, except for the verses
that condemn homosexuality.

Sure, they say, God sent fiery serpents to bite the people for complaining about
the lack of food and water, but Jesus had nothing to do with it.

Unless you believe Paul, that is. Here's what he says about it:

> Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed
> of serpents. 1 Corinthians 10:9

The people tempted Christ (by complaining) and he sent snakes to bite them.

So don't tempt Jesus, or he'll send some of his snakes to bite you too.


Posted by Steve Wells 0 comments





14 APRIL 2023


WHAT WERE THE FIERY SERPENTS IN NUMBERS 21?



In our most recent podcast, we told the story about the fiery serpents that God
sent to bite the people for complaining about the lack of food and water. It all
happens in just five verses in Numbers 21 (verses 5-9)

Here's the story from the Bible in Fewer words.

> 5 The people spoke against God and Moses, saying,
> 
> > Why did you make us leave Egypt to die in the wilderness?
> > 
> > There’s no bread or water, and we hate this light bread.
> 
> 6 So God sent fiery serpents to bite the people. And many died.
> 
> 7 The people came to Moses, and said,
> 
> > We have sinned by criticizing you and God. Ask God to take away the
> > serpents.
> 
> And Moses prayed for the people.
> 
> 8 God said to Moses,
> 
> > Make a fiery serpent and put it on a pole.
> > 
> > Whoever looks at it will live after being bit by a fiery serpent.
> 
> 9 So Moses made a brass serpent and put it on a pole.
> 
> Whoever was bitten by a fiery serpent didn't die if they looked at it.

The Brazen Serpent by James Tissot

These verses have long fascinated both believers and skeptics. What were the
mysterious "fiery serpents" that God sent to bite the people, causing many of
them to die? Well, parasitologists say it may have been the guinea worm (The
nematode Dranunculus medinensis).

To understand why the guinea worm is suspected, you must understand its life
cycle.

Guinea worm larvae are released by their mothers into a body of water. The
larvae thrash about vigorously until they attract and are eaten by a copepod,
which is a small, nearly microscopic, crustacean. The copepod is, however, just
a temporary home for the worm. It cannot complete its life cycle unless it can
somehow get inside its definitive host: a human being. This is accomplished when
someone drinks water containing the infected copepods.

The copepod's body is destroyed by the stomach acids, releasing the guinea
worms, which burrow their way through the intestinal wall. They migrate through
the abdominal cavity and into the connective tissue, stopping to mate with any
other migrating worms that they run into along the way. By this time females
have grown to be nearly a meter in length, while the males are only a few
centimeters. After the worms have sex, the little males wanders off to find a
place to die, while the females continue their journey through the human host's
body.

The migration of the female worms cause great pain and discomfort, but it is
when the worm reaches its final destination that the torment really begins. The
worms end up just beneath the surface of the skin, usually in the legs or feet,
where they remain for a month or more. Their metabolic wastes and the host's
allergic reaction cause blisters to form, resulting in intense itching and
burning pain. One of the few ways to relieve the pain is to immerse the blister
in water, inducing the worm to break through the surface of the skin releasing
millions of guinea worm larvae. A copepod eats the larvae and a human drinks
that water, completing the guinea worm life cycle.

But the human suffering is far from over when the worm breaks through the skin,
for although the female worms die soon after releasing the larvae, their dead
meter-long bodies are not easy to remove. And even if the dead worms can be
extracted without rupturing, serious secondary infections often occur.

So how are the female worms removed? Well, the traditional way, which is still
used today, is to carefully wind the worm around a stick. The only other option
is surgical removal, but this is extremely difficult and not often successful.

Using a matchstick to wind up and remove a guinea worm from the leg of a human

So were the "fiery serpents" of Numbers 21 guinea worms in disguise? I'll leave
that for you to decide, but some aspects seem to fit the description in Numbers.

The pregnant females are rather large worms and cause excruciating pain when
breaking through the skin to release their larvae. So it is easy to see how they
could be called "fiery serpents."

Guinea worms would have been present in the region at the time of the Exodus, as
they still are today. If the Israelites encountered drought conditions, as they
did according to the account in Numbers, it would have facilitated the
transmission of the disease by concentrating worm larvae, intermediate hosts
(copepods), and infected humans at the same water source.

And the serpent on a pole could well represent the most common form of
treatment, then and now: pulling out the guinea worm by winding it on a stick.

Okay, let's assume the "fiery serpents" were guinea worms. If so, what message
should we take from all this? What is God trying to tell us here? And what can
we learn about God from this passage in Numbers?

One thing that should be clear to us all, of course, is the moral of the story:
Don’t whine. God can’t stand a whiner. So if you or your children don’t have
enough to eat or drink, well, just keep quiet about it. Whatever you do don’t
mention it to God. If you ever get tempted to complain about it, just look at
the above photo as a reminder.

So we know why God did it. What isn’t so clear, to me at least, is how. Did he
simply infect the drinking water with guinea worm larvae? Or did he specially
create guinea worms just for the occasion? If so, why didn’t he clean up
afterwards? Why did millions of people have to suffer (and still suffer today)
because the Israelites complained to God about their living conditions?

And what should we make of the “serpent on a pole” thing? The bible says that
people were cured just by looking at it. Would it still work today? If so, then
someone should let people know because the current treatment is much more
involved (and painful) than that.

You also have to wonder why God didn’t explain how to prevent further
infections, because prevention is much easier than treatment. All that is needed
is to filter the drinking water through a fine-mesh cloth to remove the
copepods. (The World Health Organization and the Carter Center has nearly
eradicated the disease by using this method.) Wouldn’t that be better than
Moses’s magic brass serpent - or the real treatment that this may have
represented? Didn’t God know how to prevent the disease that he created?

But the last question is most important of all. Why are there guinea worms? Did
God specifically design these worms to live inside the body of humans? Or were
they created by Satan? Or did they just evolve, and God had nothing to do with
it? If the first is true, then God is evil. If the second, then there are at
least two gods. If the third, then God cannot control his own creation. Which do
you think it is?


Posted by Steve Wells 0 comments





13 APRIL 2023


ABOUT THAT RED COW IN NUMBERS 19



The passage in Numbers 19:1-10 is rather uninteresting in itself. So much so, in
fact, that I almost left it out of the Bible in Fewer Words podcast. It is,
after all, just another animal sacrifice - the type of thing that is found
throughout the Pentateuch. There are burnt offerings, meat offerings, peace
offerings, sin offerings, heave offerings, and wave offerings. And I've probably
left out a few. This one seems to be just one more.

But it turns out that this one is rather special - at least to many of today's
Christians and Jews. Pretty much everything depends on the red cow [1] of
Numbers 19. Without it the temple can't be rebuilt, the Messiah won't come,
Jesus won't return, and the world won't end.

You're probably wondering how that can all be true. Well, God commanded the
Israelites to find and kill a red, unblemished heifer that had never done a
day's work in its life. After killing it, they were to burn its flesh, skin,
blood and dung. God told them to collect the resulting ashes, mix them with
water, and use it to purify those who happen to touch (or come near) a bone,
dead body or grave.

God made it clear that this cleaning procedure could only be done by using this
"water of separation" made from the red cow's ashes. And that this was a statute
forever.

Things worked out fine from the time of Moses until the destruction of the
second temple in 70 CE. Enough unblemished red heifers were found, killed, and
burned to keep a continuous supply of holy water. But when the Romans destroyed
the temple, the stash of ashes was lost or destroyed.

Many, perhaps most, of the Jews in Jerusalem were killed during the siege, and
those that survived were enslaved, displaced, or fled to surrounding countries.
This caused a complete change in Judaism: from a temple-based religion, with
lots of animal sacrifices, to a new form called Rabbinical Judaism, with no
sacrifices.

Maimonides, a renowned rabbi who lived the late 12th and early 13th centuries,
said that there were only nine red heifers from the time of Moses to the
destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE. During that time the ashes were saved
and used as necessary to make the water of separation, which ensured that the
priests could be purified to allow them to perform the temple animal sacrifices.
But after the ashes of the last red heifer were lost and the temple was
destroyed, it was no longer possible to perform them.

So for nearly 2000 years, the Jews haven't sacrificed animals to God. There are,
of course, many commandments in the Bible that require animal sacrifices, but
the Jews believe that sacrifices can only be performed by priests in the temple.
And since there is no temple, there can't be any sacrifices.

And that seemed like a good excuse until relatively recently. The Jews returned
to Israel in 1948 and took control of the territory that contains the site of
the temple in 1967. So a third temple could be rebuilt and animal sacrifices
could resume. What's the hold up?

The hold up is the red cow.[2] A red cow that meets the requirements of Numbers
19 must be found and sacrificed to make the holy water that can purify priests
from all the dead bodies that they have come into contact with during their
lives.

Once a red cow is found, killed, and burned, its ashes can be used to purify
priests, the temple can be rebuilt, and God will smell the sweet savor of
burning animal flesh once again.

And according to Maimonides, when the third temple is rebuilt the Messiah will
come.

Of course, Christians believe the Messiah came and went a long time ago. But
many also believe that when a red heifer is found and the temple is rebuilt,
he'll come again. And then all hell will break loose and the end of the world
will come.

Recently five red heifers have been sent from Texas to Jerusalem, hoping that
one of them will meet the rabbi's standards.

Here's a video about it.



And an update on 8 April 23



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 1. There is some disagreement about the color of the cow. The Quran insists
    that the cow was bright yellow.
    
    > Allah commandeth you that ye sacrifice a cow ... Verily she is a yellow
    > cow. Bright is her colour, gladdening beholders. Quran 2:67-69

 2. Well, that's not the only hold up. The Dome of the Rock, which is one of
    Islam's most holy sites, is situated on top of the site of the second
    temple. So the third temple couldn't be built there without causing even
    more hostility between Jews and Muslims.
    
    But I suspect that the real reason why the temple will not be rebuilt is
    that Jews don't want to sacrifice animals anymore, and not having a temple
    provides a convenient excuse not to.


Posted by Steve Wells 0 comments





08 APRIL 2023


HAPPY JESUS-IN-HELL DAY!


Descent into Hell by Michael Burghers

Now that Jesus is dead (they killed him in the Philippines on Good Friday), we
can celebrate what happened after he died.


HAPPY JESUS-IN-HELL DAY!

Most Christians (well, Protestants, anyway) don't know this, but Jesus went
directly to hell after he died.

Really, he did. It says so in the Bible.

> He [David] seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his
> soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption. Acts 2:31

The above quote is from the speech that Peter gave on the day of Pentecost --
you know, the day that believers spoke in languages they didn't understand and
acted like they were drunk.

So it must be true. (If you can't trust a drunken Pentecostal preacher who was
also the first pope, who can you trust?)

There are a couple of other references to Jesus's day in hell by someone who
claimed to be Peter, but wasn't.

Here's what the forger of 1 Peter said about it.

> Christ ... went and preached unto the spirits in prison. 1 Peter 3:19
> 
> For this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead. 1 Peter 4:6

So Jesus preached the gospel to the dead people "in prison" -- that is, to the
people in hell.

And then there's this from Ephesians (another forgery, this time attributed to
Paul).

> Christ ... descended first into the lower parts of the earth. He that
> descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he
> might fill all things. Ephesians 4:7-9

So Jesus descended "into the lower parts of the earth" -- which, as we all know,
is where hell is.

Of course, Catholics know all this. They are reminded every time they attend
mass or say the rosary, because it's right there in The Apostles' Creed.

> I believe in God, the Father almighty, Creator of heaven and earth, and in
> Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
> born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died
> and was buried; he descended into hell....

So get out and celebrate Jesus's descent into hell.

Here are some cool pictures that Jesus took during his visit to inspire you.

The first is a photo of a very tall Jesus meeting Adam and Eve as they come out
of their demon-mouth house.

Here's one, on Saturday night, after Jesus put on his transparent robe.

And here's Jesus in a hurry to meet the ladies of hell.

Here's Jesus delivering the sermon from hell.

And here he is Sunday morning before heading back to the tomb.

So to hell with Easter. Celebrate Jesus-in-Hell Day instead!


Posted by Steve Wells 0 comments



Older Posts Home

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)



Drunk With Blood Audiobook:
Introduction





Subscribe to our mailing list




AUDIOBOOK











SUBSCRIBE TO

Posts
Atom

Posts

All Comments
Atom

All Comments



RSS Feed



SEARCH THIS BLOG






A BIASED SAMPLE

 * Every Jot and Tittle: A list of all the Bible's commandments
 * A Challenge to Christians
 * How many has God killed? (Complete list and estimated total)
 * Islam: It's mostly about going to the bathroom
 * Blogging the Book of Mormon
 * Who had the most powerful spit? Jesus or Muhammad?
 * What was Muhammad like? A detailed description from the Ash-Shifa
 * 50 reasons to be ashamed (and not a fan) of Jesus
 * Who has killed more, Satan or God?
 * God's Top 50 Killings in the Bible
 * Where do evil spirits come from?
 * The worth of a woman: The Bible vs. the Quran
 * 208 ways to get yourself saved
 * Real men pee standing up
 * Everybody must get stoned
 * Where do evil spirits come from?
 * What does Jesus have written on his testicles?
 * Why Christian "Marriage" is Wrong
 * Is it wrong to burn people to death?
 * The Top 50 Bible Stories for kids
 * Which bits of the Bible are we still to believe?




BLOG ARCHIVE

 * ►  2006 (77)
   * ►  Jun 2006 (16)
   * ►  Jul 2006 (15)
   * ►  Aug 2006 (12)
   * ►  Sep 2006 (8)
   * ►  Oct 2006 (9)
   * ►  Nov 2006 (11)
   * ►  Dec 2006 (6)

 * ►  2007 (33)
   * ►  Jan 2007 (6)
   * ►  Feb 2007 (4)
   * ►  Mar 2007 (2)
   * ►  Apr 2007 (2)
   * ►  May 2007 (1)
   * ►  Jun 2007 (2)
   * ►  Jul 2007 (2)
   * ►  Aug 2007 (1)
   * ►  Sep 2007 (1)
   * ►  Oct 2007 (5)
   * ►  Nov 2007 (3)
   * ►  Dec 2007 (4)

 * ►  2008 (68)
   * ►  Jan 2008 (3)
   * ►  Feb 2008 (3)
   * ►  Mar 2008 (8)
   * ►  Apr 2008 (11)
   * ►  May 2008 (8)
   * ►  Jun 2008 (8)
   * ►  Jul 2008 (4)
   * ►  Aug 2008 (6)
   * ►  Sep 2008 (8)
   * ►  Oct 2008 (5)
   * ►  Nov 2008 (3)
   * ►  Dec 2008 (1)

 * ►  2009 (137)
   * ►  Jan 2009 (11)
   * ►  Feb 2009 (5)
   * ►  Mar 2009 (9)
   * ►  Apr 2009 (7)
   * ►  May 2009 (6)
   * ►  Jun 2009 (9)
   * ►  Jul 2009 (17)
   * ►  Aug 2009 (8)
   * ►  Sep 2009 (14)
   * ►  Oct 2009 (29)
   * ►  Nov 2009 (11)
   * ►  Dec 2009 (11)

 * ►  2010 (174)
   * ►  Jan 2010 (17)
   * ►  Feb 2010 (35)
   * ►  Mar 2010 (28)
   * ►  Apr 2010 (13)
   * ►  May 2010 (8)
   * ►  Jun 2010 (21)
   * ►  Jul 2010 (8)
   * ►  Aug 2010 (12)
   * ►  Sep 2010 (6)
   * ►  Oct 2010 (11)
   * ►  Nov 2010 (8)
   * ►  Dec 2010 (7)

 * ►  2011 (81)
   * ►  Jan 2011 (7)
   * ►  Feb 2011 (4)
   * ►  Mar 2011 (9)
   * ►  Apr 2011 (12)
   * ►  May 2011 (7)
   * ►  Jun 2011 (6)
   * ►  Jul 2011 (4)
   * ►  Aug 2011 (6)
   * ►  Sep 2011 (13)
   * ►  Oct 2011 (5)
   * ►  Nov 2011 (6)
   * ►  Dec 2011 (2)

 * ►  2012 (108)
   * ►  Jan 2012 (3)
   * ►  Feb 2012 (5)
   * ►  Mar 2012 (12)
   * ►  Apr 2012 (12)
   * ►  May 2012 (10)
   * ►  Jun 2012 (6)
   * ►  Jul 2012 (9)
   * ►  Aug 2012 (5)
   * ►  Sep 2012 (10)
   * ►  Oct 2012 (14)
   * ►  Nov 2012 (13)
   * ►  Dec 2012 (9)

 * ►  2013 (89)
   * ►  Jan 2013 (10)
   * ►  Feb 2013 (6)
   * ►  Mar 2013 (6)
   * ►  Apr 2013 (4)
   * ►  May 2013 (11)
   * ►  Jun 2013 (4)
   * ►  Jul 2013 (10)
   * ►  Aug 2013 (10)
   * ►  Sep 2013 (6)
   * ►  Oct 2013 (5)
   * ►  Nov 2013 (10)
   * ►  Dec 2013 (7)

 * ►  2014 (161)
   * ►  Jan 2014 (13)
   * ►  Feb 2014 (12)
   * ►  Mar 2014 (5)
   * ►  Apr 2014 (9)
   * ►  May 2014 (15)
   * ►  Jun 2014 (13)
   * ►  Jul 2014 (29)
   * ►  Aug 2014 (10)
   * ►  Sep 2014 (5)
   * ►  Oct 2014 (15)
   * ►  Nov 2014 (14)
   * ►  Dec 2014 (21)

 * ►  2015 (96)
   * ►  Jan 2015 (11)
   * ►  Feb 2015 (11)
   * ►  Mar 2015 (13)
   * ►  Apr 2015 (19)
   * ►  May 2015 (15)
   * ►  Jun 2015 (9)
   * ►  Jul 2015 (7)
   * ►  Aug 2015 (1)
   * ►  Sep 2015 (4)
   * ►  Nov 2015 (2)
   * ►  Dec 2015 (4)

 * ►  2016 (7)
   * ►  Jan 2016 (1)
   * ►  May 2016 (1)
   * ►  Jun 2016 (4)
   * ►  Oct 2016 (1)

 * ►  2017 (5)
   * ►  Jul 2017 (4)
   * ►  Nov 2017 (1)

 * ►  2018 (2)
   * ►  Jun 2018 (1)
   * ►  Oct 2018 (1)

 * ►  2019 (2)
   * ►  Mar 2019 (2)

 * ►  2020 (4)
   * ►  Mar 2020 (1)
   * ►  Jun 2020 (1)
   * ►  Aug 2020 (1)
   * ►  Nov 2020 (1)

 * ►  2022 (4)
   * ►  Jan 2022 (3)
   * ►  Aug 2022 (1)

 * ▼  2023 (8)
   * ►  Mar 2023 (1)
   * ▼  Apr 2023 (7)
     * Father Mike Schmitz explains the law of jealousies...
     * About the new website
     * Happy Jesus-in-hell day!
     * About that red cow in Numbers 19
     * What were the fiery serpents in Numbers 21?
     * So it was Jesus who sent the fiery serpents in Num...
     * About the new Skeptic's Annotated Bible website




CONTRIBUTORS

 * Steve Wells
 * Unknown










Watermark theme. Powered by Blogger.



Diese Website verwendet Cookies von Google, um Dienste anzubieten und Zugriffe
zu analysieren. Deine IP-Adresse und dein User-Agent werden zusammen mit
Messwerten zur Leistung und Sicherheit für Google freigegeben. So können
Nutzungsstatistiken generiert, Missbrauchsfälle erkannt und behoben und die
Qualität des Dienstes gewährleistet werden.Weitere InformationenOk