www.newadvent.org Open in urlscan Pro
2400:52e0:1a00::894:1  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

../utility/search.htm

<form id="searchbox_000299817191393086628:ifmbhlr-8x0" action="../utility/search.htm">
  <!-- Hidden Inputs -->
  <input type="hidden" name="safe" value="active">
  <input type="hidden" name="cx" value="000299817191393086628:ifmbhlr-8x0">
  <input type="hidden" name="cof" value="FORID:9">
  <!-- Search Box -->
  <label for="searchQuery" id="searchQueryLabel">Search:</label>
  <input id="searchQuery" name="q" type="text" size="25" aria-labelledby="searchQueryLabel">
  <!-- Submit Button -->
  <label for="submitButton" id="submitButtonLabel" class="visually-hidden">Submit Search</label>
  <input id="submitButton" type="submit" name="sa" value="Search" aria-labelledby="submitButtonLabel">
</form>

Text Content

 

Search: Submit Search



 Home   Encyclopedia   Summa   Fathers   Bible   Library 

 A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z 


Home > Catholic Encyclopedia > P > Peterspence


PETERSPENCE

Please help support the mission of New Advent and get the full contents of this
website as an instant download. Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church
Fathers, Summa, Bible and more — all for only $19.99...

Peterspence, otherwise known to the Anglo-Saxons as "Romescot", is the name
traditionally given to an annual contribution or tribute (originally of a penny
from each householder holding land of a certain value) paid to the exchequer of
the Holy See by various peoples of Christendom. In the Middle Ages this form of
contribution seems almost to have been confined to England and some few other
northern nations, and it was unquestionably in England that it took its rise.
Neglecting some vague and unreliable traditions which ascribed the origin of
"Romescot" to Ini, King of Wessex, in 727, we are possibly on firmer ground if
we identify the beginnings of this contribution with a sum of 365 mancuses
yearly, promised by Offa of Mercia, and confirmed to the pope's legates at the
Synod of Chelsea in 787. The promise is mentioned in an extant letter from Pope
Leo III to Kenulf, Otto's successor (Haddan and Stubbs, "Councils", III, 445,
525; cf. ibid., 538). It is stated that the money was to be applied to the
relief of the poor and to providing lights for the churches of Rome, and, rather
strangely, nothing is said of the support of the Anglo-Saxon School ("Schola
Saxonum") in the Borgo, which Pope Alexander II and later chroniclers closely
associated with the beginnings of Peterspence. Again it seems certain that
Ethelwulf after his visit to Rome with his son Alfred (c. 855) ordered that
three hundred mancuses were to be sent to the Holy See each year (Asser, ed.
Stevenson, 15, 211). Whether this was a new grant, or a confirmation of the
tribute of Offa, is not clear (cf. Liebermann, "Ueber die Leges Eadwardi", 55);
neither is it certain whether this sum of 300 mancuses was to be provided out of
the royal exchequer or collected in pennies from the people. We only know that
not long afterwards, during reign of Alfred, the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle speaks of
the conveyance to Rome of "the donation of the Wessex folk and their king" (cf.
Chron. Æthelwardi, A.D. 888), and that in the code known as the "Dooms of Edward
and Guthrum", which no doubt represents the legislation of Alfred's reign, we
find for the first time explicit mention of "Romfeoh" as a contribution paid by
the people. Under Edmund (941-46), at a great council of the clergy and laity
held in London at Easter time, "Romfeoh" was declared to be one of the dues
which must be paid by every man under pain of excommunication, and a later
ordinance under Edgar speaks of it as the "hearth-penny" and enjoins with
threats of heavy penalties that it must be paid by St. Peter's Massday, i.e.
"Lammas", the feast of St. Peter's Chains (1 August). That the tax was in fact
collected and sent to Rome in coins of small value, archæological evidence has
proved. In 1883 a hoard of 835 coins was discovered in Rome, apparently near the
site of one of the old papal palaces. Almost all these pieces without exception
were Anglo-Saxon silver pennies, 2171 of them bearing the imprint of King Edward
the Elder, and 393 that of Athelstan, none of them being later than the year
947. There can be no doubt that this find represents an installment of
Peterspence sent to Rome just as it had been collected; and the conclusion is
confirmed by some other archæological discoveries of earlier date.



A remarkable letter of King Cnut, written from Rome in 1027 to his people in
England, expresses in solemn terms his devotion to the Holy See and enjoins that
Peterspence and some other ecclesiastical taxes should be paid before his return
to England. "Cnut", says Dr. Jensen, "undoubtedly renewed and confirmed the
donation from England to the papal court on the occasion of this pilgrimage to
Rome." The manner of levying the tax is, however, imperfectly understood, for,
as Liebermann has shown (Eng. Hist. Rev., 1896, p. 746), M. Fabre is mistaken in
supposing that he has found the text of Cnut's agreement in the "Liber Censuum".
In spite of Cnut's good will, considerable negligence about the payment of
Peterspence continued under the later Anglo-Saxon kings. After the Norman
Conquest, St. Gregory VII addressed a formal demand to King William in 1074.
"Concerning the Peterspence to be collected in England", he wrote, "we charge
you to watch over it as if it were your own revenue." After some delays the
Conqueror wrote a conciliatory reply and, while refusing feudal homage to the
papacy as not justified by any precedent, he formally recognized the claim to
Peterspence and promised that the arrears should be made up. But though the
contribution on the whole was paid, and though various efforts and
accommodations were made by the popes and their representatives in England, it
seems clear that the collection of Peterspence was at hardly any time carried
out in a way that was satisfactory to the Holy See. Innocent III on 28 Jan.,
1214, wrote indignantly to the English bishops that "certain prelates having
collected these pence [denarios] in our name, have not been ashamed to retain
the greater part for themselves. They paid us only 300 marks, usurping for their
own use 1000 marks or more" (Potthast, "Regesta", no. 2635). This language, as
Dr. Jensen forcibly urges, seems inconsistent with the idea of any formal
composition assented to by the Holy See, in virtue of which the popes agreed to
farm the whole proceeds of Peterspence for a payment of 300 marks. It seems,
however, that this annual payment of a sum of 300 (or more strictly 299) marks
was the solution practically arrived at, and we even know the proportions in
which this amount was levied upon the different dioceses of England.

Another point to be noted is that both before and after the surrender of the
kingdom by King John, who made England the fief of the Holy See (see ENGLAND), a
certain confusion seems sometimes to have existed between Peterspence and the
feudal tribute, called in Latin census, which was paid as the price of the papal
protection. The two, however, were really quite distinct. In 1317 Edward II
acknowledged that the annual feudal tribute of 1000 marks had not been paid for
twenty-four years, and his agent undertook solemn engagements to pay off the
arrears by installments. This promise was never fulfilled. Edward III paid this
tribute for a time, but would not accept any responsibility for any outstanding
debts. After 1343 no further payments were made, and in 1366 the tribute was
formally repudiated, and abolished by Parliament. On the other hand the sum of
300 marks, which was annually due to the pope as Peterspence, can be shown to
have been collected and sent at least intermittently down to Henry VIII's breach
with Rome. It was abolished in 1534, and though temporarily revived under Mary,
it was not found possible at that time to levy it throughout England.

In Sweden, Norway, and Iceland, countries whose religious traditions can be
shown in a number of different ways to have been borrowed from England, it seems
clear that a contribution of a penny from every household was made not
unwillingly. Adrian IV, who before he was made pope had visited Scandinavia and
regulated the payment of this tax, desired also, if we may accept the
authenticity of the Bull, "Laudabiliter", to extend it to Ireland. In any case
there had no doubt existed in Rome, from the time of Gregory VII and probably
earlier, some vague tradition that this payment of a denarius per household had
been sanctioned by Charlemagne. But in many parts of the world, as, for example,
Portugal, the Two Sicilies, Poland, etc., it is not always easy to distinguish
the Peterspence proper from the feudal tribute above referred to, which was the
price of papal protection.



The payment of anything resembling Peterspence seems nowhere to have survived
the Reformation. But at the time when Pius IX, driven from Rome by the
Revolutionaries, took refuge at Gaeta, the Comte de Montalembert is said to have
taken the lead in organizing a Catholic Committee in France, which, working in
harmony with the bishops, was eventually successful in collecting a very
substantial subsidy for the pope under the name of the "denier de Saint Pierre"
(Daux, p. 46). Others assign the beginnings of the work to a voluntary
contribution organized at Vienna in 1860 by the "Confraternity of St. Michael"
which spread first to Ireland and then to the rest of the world. Certain it is
that already in the sixties large amounts were being sent to Rome as Peterspence
from France, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, and many other countries. Since the
occupation of Rome by the Italian Government and the rejection by Pius IX of the
Law of Guarantees, the sums paid as Peterspence have become one of the principal
sources of income of the Holy See. Accurate statistics are wanting, but it was
stated in 1866 that the total receipts under this one head amounted to about
£360,000 ($1,800,000) annually. At one time after the occupation of Rome
something near £800,000 ($4,000,000) is said to have been sent to Rome as
Peterspence in one year; but these figures have very much fallen off of late
owing to the persecution of the Church in France and the severe strain now made
upon the resources of Catholics in that country. For the most part the
contributions made under this head are sent to Rome through the bishops, but in
the collection of funds the most important part of the work is done by various
"Peterspence Associations", that of St. Michael and that of "Le Denier de Saint
Pierre" being the best known. The members of these organizations pledge
themselves to make some very small minimum contribution; they solicit the
subscription of others; and they unite in certain exercises of piety, which are
richly indulgenced.




SOURCES

     JENSEN in the Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, New Series, XV
(1901), 171-247; XIX (1905), 209-277; JENSEN, Der englische Peterspfennig and
die Lehnsteuer aus England und Irland (Heidelberg, 1903); FABRE, Le "Liber
Censuum" de l'Église romaine (Paris, 1892); FABRE in Mélanges G. B. de Rossi
(Paris, 1892), 159 sq.; FABRE, Der Peterspfennig als Einnamequelle der eng.
Krone in Zeitschrift f. Socialgesch. (1896); DAUX, Le Denier de Saint Pierre
(Paris, 1907); HERGENRÖTHER in Kirchenlex., I, 77; LINGARD, History of England;
IDEM, Antiquities of the Anglo-Saxon Church.


ABOUT THIS PAGE

APA citation. Thurston, H. (1911). Peterspence. In The Catholic Encyclopedia.
New York: Robert Appleton Company. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11774a.htm

MLA citation. Thurston, Herbert. "Peterspence." The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol.
11. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911.
<http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11774a.htm>.

Transcription. This article was transcribed for New Advent by WGKofron. With
thanks to St. Mary's Church, Akron, Ohio.

Ecclesiastical approbation. Nihil Obstat. February 1, 1911. Remy Lafort, S.T.D.,
Censor. Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York.

Contact information. The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight. My email address
is webmaster at newadvent.org. Regrettably, I can't reply to every letter, but I
greatly appreciate your feedback — especially notifications about typographical
errors and inappropriate ads.

Copyright © 2023 by New Advent LLC. Dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

CONTACT US | ADVERTISE WITH NEW ADVENT