endpts.com Open in urlscan Pro
65.9.95.14  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://e.endpointsnews.com/t/t-l-vthhuc-wdkidkjhd-k/
Effective URL: https://endpts.com/astrazeneca-prepares-to-live-with-the-ira-shifting-focus-of-arguments-to-orphan-drug-changes/
Submission: On November 13 via api from US — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

https://endpts.com/

<form action="https://endpts.com/">
  <input type="text" name="s" placeholder="Search">
  <button class="epn_ux_button epn_white epn_search_submit_button"></button>
</form>

Text Content

 * Channels
   * All News
   * In Focus
   * Special
   * AI
   * Bioregnum
   * Biotech Voices
   * Cell/Gene Tx
   * China
   * Coronavirus
   * Deals
   * Diagnostics
   * Discovery
   * FDA+
   * Financing
   * Health Tech
   * Law
   * Letters to the Editor
   * Manufacturing
   * Marketing
   * Opinion
   * Outsourcing
   * Peer Review
   * People
   * Pharma
   * R&D
   * Startups
   * Weekly
 * Webinars
 * Biopharma Jobs
 * More
   * Work at Endpoints
   * Letter to Editors
   * IPO Tracker
   * Webinars
   * Events
   * Sponsored Posts
   * Advertise
   * Privacy Policy
   * Endpoints Merch
   * About Us
   * Help


 * SIGN UP
 * LOG IN



Pascal Soriot, AstraZeneca CEO (Cole Burston/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
November 10, 2023 03:55 PM EST
Pharma
Law


AS­TRAZENECA PRE­PARES TO LIVE WITH THE IRA, SHIFT­ING FO­CUS OF AR­GU­MENTS TO
OR­PHAN DRUG CHANGES


MAX GELMAN

SENIOR EDITOR

NEW YORK — As­traZeneca may be get­ting ready to live with the In­fla­tion
Re­duc­tion Act.

On Fri­day morn­ing, CEO Pas­cal So­ri­ot told re­porters that the drug­mak­er
is most fo­cused on get­ting the 2022 law ad­just­ed, not in­val­i­dat­ed. His
com­ments are the most di­rect yet from a ma­jor phar­ma CEO about a fu­ture in
which the IRA is not ful­ly over­turned by the courts, as sev­er­al drug­mak­ers
have sued to try and do.

“We saw a bet­ter ap­proach is ac­tu­al­ly not to go against the law it­self —
be­cause the law has been passed by Con­gress, it’s a law — but to chal­lenge
the im­ple­men­ta­tion,” So­ri­ot told re­porters in New York.

advertisement

advertisement
Arad­hana Sarin

So­ri­ot and CFO Arad­hana Sarin were dis­cussing an IRA pro­vi­sion that
ex­empts or­phan drugs from price ne­go­ti­a­tions un­der the law on­ly if they
re­ceive the or­phan des­ig­na­tion — which comes with sev­en years of mar­ket
ex­clu­siv­i­ty — for a sin­gle dis­ease. Most or­phan drugs, how­ev­er,
re­ceive des­ig­na­tions for mul­ti­ple dis­eases. Un­der the IRA, they’d lose
their ex­clu­sive mar­ket rights and be el­i­gi­ble for price ne­go­ti­a­tion if
they got more than one or­phan des­ig­na­tion.

“Our ar­gu­ment is, we ac­cept it, we ac­cept that gov­ern­ments need to man­age
costs,” So­ri­ot said. “But for rare dis­eases, we need to make sure there’s
enough in­cen­tive for com­pa­nies to con­tin­ue to in­vest.”

So­ri­ot gave the ex­am­ple of Lyn­parza, the com­pa­ny’s ovar­i­an, breast and
prostate can­cer drug. The drug was first ap­proved for third-line ovar­i­an
can­cer in 2014 and gained an or­phan des­ig­na­tion and the cor­re­spond­ing
mar­ket ex­clu­siv­i­ty. It sold rel­a­tive­ly lit­tle in its first three years
on the mar­ket and then be­came a multi­bil­lion-dol­lar drug af­ter clinch­ing
more ap­provals.

US gov­ern­ment spend­ing on the drug was on­ly about $45.9 mil­lion in 2021 —
far low­er than drugs at the top of the list. It’s not cur­rent­ly on the list
of drugs up first for ne­go­ti­a­tion.

‘WE HAVE TO GET A RE­TURN’

De­spite that, So­ri­ot said As­traZeneca wouldn’t have pur­sued the same
strat­e­gy for the treat­ment and would have fore­gone the late-line ovar­i­an
can­cer FDA sub­mis­sion.

“It’s not that we want to be dif­fi­cult, but at the end of the day, we have to
get a re­turn on in­vest­ment so we can rein­vest in our pipeline,” So­ri­ot
said. “So for two or three years, es­sen­tial­ly, we will launch the prod­uct
every­where in the world. And we will not file in the US be­cause you lose three
years sell­ing very lit­tle.”

Such threats have be­come com­mon among drug­mak­ers, who rou­tine­ly tell
reg­u­la­tors in the US and in Eu­rope that poli­cies will push them out of the
mar­ket. On­ly on rare oc­ca­sions has that proven to be the case, and it’s not
clear how many com­pa­nies might ac­tu­al­ly fol­low through once the IRA is in
full force.

But Fri­day’s com­ments are no­tably dif­fer­ent from oth­er phar­ma CEOs who
have cast the IRA in far more dire terms. Eli Lil­ly CEO David Ricks said the
gag or­der built in­to the ne­go­ti­a­tion process is “feel­ing a lit­tle
Or­wellian”; Bio­gen CEO Chris Viehbach­er called the en­tire law “dra­con­ian.”

DRUG­MAK­ER LAW­SUITS

Like Mer­ck, Bris­tol My­ers Squibb and J&J, As­traZeneca has sued over the law.
As­traZeneca’s law­suit ar­gues that the IRA gave too much au­thor­i­ty to the
Cen­ters for Medicare & Med­ic­aid Ser­vices, and as a re­sult CMS vi­o­lat­ed
the law’s pro­vi­sions.

The suit al­so claims that the law it­self is un­con­sti­tu­tion­al by
in­fring­ing on the “Due Process Clause” in the Fifth Amend­ment, de­priv­ing
As­traZeneca’s abil­i­ty to sell its drugs with­out suf­fi­cient pro­ce­dur­al
pro­tec­tion. Oth­er drug­mak­ers have al­so sued on Fifth Amend­ment grounds,
cit­ing the “Tak­ings Clause.”

The claus­es and their con­sti­tu­tion­al im­pli­ca­tions are dis­tinct, but
both deal with pri­vate prop­er­ty.

“The IRA de­prives As­traZeneca of two con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly pro­tect­ed
prop­er­ty in­ter­ests: its in­vest­ment-backed patent rights and com­mon-law
right to sell its prod­ucts at mar­ket prices free from ar­bi­trary and
in­ad­e­quate­ly dis­closed gov­ern­men­tal con­straints. And the statute works
this de­pri­va­tion up­on As­traZeneca in­vol­un­tar­i­ly,” As­traZeneca said in
the com­plaint.

At the meet­ing with re­porters on Fri­day, So­ri­ot was asked if his com­ments
about the IRA be­ing law meant the com­pa­ny would with­draw its suit. He and
Sarin didn’t di­rect­ly an­swer, and said the fo­cus of their suit was on how
the law was im­ple­ment­ed, not the va­lid­i­ty of the law it­self.

A spokesper­son for the com­pa­ny said af­ter the in­ter­view that As­traZeneca
has no plans to with­draw its suit.

AR­GU­MENTS OVER THE OR­PHAN CLOCK

The or­phan drug is­sue So­ri­ot gave as an ex­am­ple is com­pound­ed by
an­oth­er clause in the law. Un­der the IRA, small-mol­e­cule drugs are giv­en
nine years be­fore they’re sub­ject to ne­go­ti­a­tion. Large mol­e­cule
bi­o­log­ics get 13 years.

In So­ri­ot’s view, he be­lieves the law should be ad­just­ed to start the
mar­ket ex­clu­siv­i­ty clock not af­ter an or­phan drug’s first ap­proval, but
on­ly af­ter it re­ceives its first ap­proval in a non-or­phan in­di­ca­tion.

Us­ing the Lyn­parza ex­am­ple, So­ri­ot said the clock should start not when it
re­ceived the third-line ovar­i­an can­cer ap­proval in De­cem­ber 2014, but at
its first ap­proval in a non-or­phan in­di­ca­tion — its Jan­u­ary 2018
ap­proval for BR­CA-mu­tat­ed breast can­cer.

“CMS was much too lib­er­al, too ex­pan­sive in its in­ter­pre­ta­tion of the
law,” So­ri­ot said. “That’s re­al­ly what we fo­cused on,” he con­tin­ued,
while not­ing that oth­er drug­mak­ers’ suits may suc­ceed.

But, he said, “our most im­por­tant goal is to get this fix around start­ing the
clock.”




AUTHOR


MAX GELMAN

SENIOR EDITOR

max@endpointsnews.com @MaxGelman
Max Gelman on LinkedIn


TRENDING NOW


VERVE SHARES FIRST BASE EDIT­ING RE­SULTS IN HU­MANS, SUG­GEST­ING THER­A­PY CAN
LOW­ER CHO­LES­TEROL IN PA­TIENTS WITH GE­NET­IC ...


AF­TER SHOW­ING WE­GOVY CUT CAR­DIO­VAS­CU­LAR RISK BY 20%, RE­SULTS DE­TAIL
IM­PACT ON DEATH AND HEART FAIL­URE


FIRST DA­TA FOR LIL­LY'S RNA TREAT­MENT FOR HEART DIS­EASE POINT TO LONG-TERM
DURA­BIL­I­TY IN TINY GROUP OF PA­TIENTS


AL­NY­LAM’S LONGER-TERM RNAI TREAT­MENT LOW­ERS BLOOD PRES­SURE IN MID-STAGE
STUDY


AN­THOS' BLOOD THIN­NER CUTS THE RISK OF BLEED­ING AMID RACE TO DE­VEL­OP SAFER
AN­TI­CO­AG­U­LANTS

sponsored


CLIN­I­CAL STUD­IES IN JAPAN TO­DAY: AN­OTH­ER LOOK AT THE WORLD’S
SEC­OND-LARGEST PRE­SCRIP­TION DRUG MAR­KET IN A ...

Bioscience & Technology Business Center
The University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas




LATEST

 * All News
 * Special
 * In Focus
   


CHANNELS

 * AI
 * Bioregnum
 * Biotech Voices
 * Cell/Gene Tx
 * China
 * Coronavirus
 * Deals
 * Diagnostics
 * Discovery
 * FDA+
 * Financing
 * Health Tech
 * Law
 * Letters to the Editor
 * Manufacturing
 * Marketing
 * Opinion
 * Outsourcing
 * Peer Review
 * People
 * Pharma
 * R&D
 * Startups
 * Weekly


MORE

 * Work at Endpoints
 * Letter to Editors
 * IPO Tracker
 * Events
 * Webinars
 * Sponsored Posts
 * Advertise
 * Endpoints Merch
 * About Us
 * Help


WORK IN BIOTECH

 * Endpoints Careers

© Endpoints News 2023

 * Help
 * Advertise
 * Privacy Policy
 * Business Model




LOG IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT


EMAIL




PASSWORD


Change my password Get a magic email link
LOG IN


REQUEST MAGIC LINK

If you're already an Endpoints subscriber, enter your email below for a magic
link that lets you log in quickly without using a password. Please note the
magic link is one-time use only and expires after 24 hours.


EMAIL


BACK
REQUEST


RESET PASSWORD

We'll e-mail you a link to set a new password. Please note this link is one-time
use only and is valid for only 24 hours.


EMAIL


BACK
RESET

SIGN UP FOR FREE TO READ A LIMITED NUMBER OF ARTICLES EACH MONTH.

ABOUT YOU







NEWSLETTER INTERESTS

PICK WHAT NEWSLETTERS GET DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX EACH WEEK.

Biopharma

ENDPOINTS NEWS Daily at 11:30 AM ET



EARLY EDITION Daily at 7:15 AM ET



ENDPOINTS PHARMA Daily at 2 PM ET



BREAKING NEWS ALERTS 2-3 times a week



ENDPOINTS MARKETING RX Tue at 2 PM ET



ENDPOINTS FDA+ Wed at 2 PM ET



ENDPOINTS MANUFACTURING Thu at 2 PM ET



ENDPOINTS WEEKLY Sat at 6 AM ET



Healthcare

ENDPOINTS HEALTH TECH Coming soon


INSTANT SIGN UP

Want unlimited access? Sign up for a premium subscription plan.