www.medpagetoday.com Open in urlscan Pro
95.101.23.9  Public Scan

URL: https://www.medpagetoday.com/nursing/nursing/102455
Submission: On March 02 via api from IE — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

/search

<form role="search" action="/search" class="active" id="global-nav-search-bar">
  <div class="input_container">
    <label for="global-nav-search-input" class="screen-readers-only">Search</label>
    <input id="global-nav-search-input" name="q" data-name="header-search" type="search" autocomplete="off" class="search_field searchField" placeholder="Enter Search Terms">
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

 * Edit Profile
 * Manage Subscriptions
 * CME Tracker
 * Log Out

Login
Sign Up
search
Search
 * Specialties
   Back
    * Allergy & Immunology
    * Anesthesiology
    * Cardiology
    * Critical Care
    * Dermatology
    * Emergency Medicine
    * Endocrinology
    * Gastroenterology
    * Genetics
    * Geriatrics
    * HIV / AIDS
    * Hospital-Based Medicine
    * Infectious Disease
    * Nephrology
    * Neurology
    * Nursing
    * OB / GYN
    * Oncology / Hematology
    * Ophthalmology
    * Orthopedics
    * Pain Management
    * Pathology
    * Pediatrics
    * Pharmacy
    * Primary Care
    * Psychiatry
    * Pulmonology
    * Radiology
    * Rheumatology
    * Surgery
    * Transplantation
    * Urology

 * COVID-19
 * Opinion
 * Health Policy
 * Meetings
 * Special Reports
 * Break Room
 * Conditions
   Back
    * Medical Journeys
    * Condition Centers

 * Society Partners
   Back
    * AAD Reading Room
    * ACR Reading Room
    * AGA Reading Room
    * ASCO Reading Room
    * Endocrine Society Reading Room
    * IDSA Reading Room

 * CME
 * Career Center
 * Synopsi

Nursing > Nursing


HOSPITALS MORE TO BLAME THAN THE PANDEMIC FOR NURSE STAFFING WOES?


— STUDY ILLUMINATES HOW MUCH BURNOUT, WORK ENVIRONMENT ISSUES PREDATE COVID-19

by Shannon Firth, Washington Correspondent, MedPage Today December 30, 2022


MedpageToday

Share on Facebook. Opens in a new tab or window
Share on Twitter. Opens in a new tab or window
Share on LinkedIn. Opens in a new tab or window

email article


The pandemic was not the "root cause" of hospitals' problems recruiting and
retaining nurses but, rather, a "contributing factor," said the authors of a
cross-sectional study of registered nurses in two states.

High levels of nurse burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intent to leave their
employer predated the pandemic, reported Linda Aiken, PhD, RN, founding director
at the Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research at the University of
Pennsylvania School of Nursing in Philadelphia, and colleagues.



"The pandemic didn't cause [these problems]," Aiken told MedPage Today. "These
things were really bad before COVID, and they got a little bit worse."

The study underscores the need for policies to prevent chronic understaffing of
nurses in hospitals, Aiken's group wrote in their paper in Nursing Outlookopens
in a new tab or window.

"The main takeaway is that better staffed hospitals before the pandemic had
better outcomes during it, and continue to have better outcomes as time goes
on," Aiken said.

Prior to the pandemic, 57% of hospital staff nurses said there were too few
nurses to care for patients; that number grew to 67% during the pandemic.

However, the high proportion of nurses who reported burnout grew only 3
percentage points after more than 1 year of the pandemic (51% vs 48% prior to
the pandemic).

Nor was there "evidence that large numbers of nurses left healthcare or hospital
practice in the first 18 months of the pandemic," the researchers found.
Comparing pre-pandemic survey data with data collected during the pandemic, the
share of nurses employed in hospitals did not differ by more than a fraction of
1% (43.9% vs 43.7%, P=0.322).



"All this business of people throwing up their arms and saying 'There are not
nurses to hire because they've all left' [is] not really true," she said.

While there has been a lot of "disruption" and many nurses have changed
employers, "leaving your employer is not the same as leaving the field of
patient care or even leaving hospitals," Aiken stressed.

In addition, the share of nurses reporting they were "not confident in
management resolving clinical care problems" grew during the pandemic from 69.4%
to 77.5% (P<0.001), rates Aiken called shocking.

"You could see that it would be very demoralizing if three-quarters of all the
nurses that you work with have absolutely no confidence that top management is
setting a priority on the things that you are really invested in as a
clinician," she said.


MEDICAL NEWS FROM AROUND THE WEB

BBC
1
Drugs giant Eli Lilly caps monthly insulin costs in US at $35
opens in a new tab or window
Becker's Hospital Review
2
Eli Lilly caps insulin at $35 a month
opens in a new tab or window
Axios
3
Colorectal cancer getting diagnosed later, among younger people: study
opens in a new tab or window

"This is at the heart of the burnout, and the job dissatisfaction and all of the
turnover in hospitals," Aiken suggested.



Staffing Ratios

Additionally, the group found that nurses with lower patient-to-nurse staffing
ratios prior to the pandemic had lower rates of a range of negative outlooks
during the pandemic. Nurses with a pre-pandemic patient-to-nurse ratio of five
or less were less likely to endorse the following compared with those who had a
ratio of six or more:

 * Job dissatisfaction (25.1% vs 35%)
 * Unfavorable patient safety grades (33.9% vs 54.6% )
 * Poor or fair quality of care (15.7% vs 33.0%)
 * Administration doesn't listen or respond to nurses' concerns (44% vs 58.2%)

That "deep chasm" in confidence in hospital management might have been due to
furloughs and layoffs of nurses during the pandemic, leading to a loss of
confidence that hospitals really had patients' interests at heart, Aiken
suggested.

"As nurses lose their sense of loyalty to an individual hospital that just
creates this sort of revolving door where people keep going on to the next best
offer," Aiken said.



Unless they can bridge that gap in confidence, hospitals won't succeed in
bringing nurses back, she added.

One silver lining was a finding of "very good" relations between doctors and
nurses, Aiken said. The share of nurses reporting that there is "not a lot of
nurse-physician teamwork" actually declined during the pandemic from 18.9% to
15.1%.

The findings imply that fixing hospitals' nursing care shortages might take
"committing more of their budget to employing full time nurses and improving
their work environment," Aiken said, which might be achieved by engaging more
clinicians in decision-making, offering more flexible scheduling and committing
to developing their workforce.

"Everybody wants the nurse with 10 years of ICU experience when they come in the
door," Aiken said, but "successful organizations develop their own work forces
and invest in young people and help them to become experts over time and then
create policies to retain them."



Policy levers like nursing staffing standards are also important to consider,
she added, pointing to the success of California's implementation of staffing
ratios some 20 years ago.

"But no other state has been able to do it since," she said, because of strong
resistance from the hospital industry.

Instead of relying on states, Aiken suggested looking to the federal government
for support. Medicare, for instance, could make staffing levels more transparent
by requiring all hospitals that participate in the program to publicly report
their nursing ratios on the Hospital Compare website or simply mandate minimum
nurse staffing standards, she suggested.

Methodology and Limitations

The cross-sectional study was based on surveys of 151,335 registered nurses in
New York and Illinois, including a subset of 40,674 staff nurses working at 357
hospitals, representing 99% of all facilities in those states.

Data were collected via an online survey during the prepandemic period from Dec.
16, 2019, to Feb. 24, 2020, and during the pandemic from April 13, 2021, to June
22, 2021.



All registered nurses with active licenses in New York and Illinois were invited
to take the survey. Approximately 81,263 nurses participated pre-pandemic and
70,072 participated during the pandemic, for response rates of 18% and 14%,
respectively.

Respondents were asked whether they were currently employed in a healthcare
position at a hospital, employed in a healthcare position but not in a hospital,
employed but not in healthcare, not currently employed, or retired.

Because the study measures were conducted at only two points in time, the
authors warned against drawing causal inferences. The survey response rates were
also "not optimal" they wrote, although "not out of line" with other large
online surveys.

Other limitations were that the pandemic-era surveys might not have been
representative of the entire pandemic, with further changes possible since the
time of completion, and the number of overlapping respondents who participated
in both rounds of surveys was unknown.



 * Shannon Firth has been reporting on health policy as MedPage Today's
   Washington correspondent since 2014. She is also a member of the site's
   Enterprise & Investigative Reporting team. Follow

Disclosures

The study was supported by the National Council on State Boards of Nursing, the
National Institute of Nursing Research, NIH, and the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality.

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Primary Source

Nursing Outlook

Source Reference: opens in a new tab or windowAiken, LH et al "A repeated
cross-sectional study of nurses immediately before and during the Covid-19
pandemic: Implications for action" Nursing Outlook 2022;
DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2022.11.007.

Share on Facebook. Opens in a new tab or window
Share on Twitter. Opens in a new tab or window
Share on LinkedIn. Opens in a new tab or window

email article
62 Comments Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.


MEDICAL NEWS FROM AROUND THE WEB

BBC
1
Drugs giant Eli Lilly caps monthly insulin costs in US at $35
opens in a new tab or window
Becker's Hospital Review
2
Eli Lilly caps insulin at $35 a month
opens in a new tab or window
Axios
3
Colorectal cancer getting diagnosed later, among younger people: study
opens in a new tab or window






MEDICAL NEWS FROM AROUND THE WEB

BBC
1
Drugs giant Eli Lilly caps monthly insulin costs in US at $35
opens in a new tab or window
Becker's Hospital Review
2
Eli Lilly caps insulin at $35 a month
opens in a new tab or window
Axios
3
Colorectal cancer getting diagnosed later, among younger people: study
opens in a new tab or window
The Washington Post
4
Eli Lilly to cut insulin prices by 70 percent
opens in a new tab or window
Circulation
5
Myocardial Metabolomics of Human Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
opens in a new tab or window
Journal of Clinical Oncology
6
Anti-GD2 Antibody Dinutuximab Beta and Low-Dose Interleukin 2 After
Haploidentical Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With Relapsed
Neuroblastoma: A Multicenter, Phase I/II Trial.
opens in a new tab or window


RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

1

Special Reports
Nurses File Suit Against Ascension Health, Alleging Incorrect Pay
2

Special Reports
Operation Nightingale: State Nursing Boards React to the Fake Diploma Scheme
3

Nursing
Can Coke 'Enhance' Men? Why Nurses Quit; Fetus Illegally Detained, Lawyer Says
4

Nursing
Nurse Pleads Not Guilty to Amputation; Bruce Willis' Dementia; Defy Mifeprex
Order?
5

Special Reports
Nurse Charged With Killing Her Kids; Fake Psychiatrist Fooled NHS; Kid Chemo
Battle
6

Special Reports
Tinnitus From COVID Vax? Docs Replaced by NPs, PAs; Ambulance Bills Still
Surprise


Visit us on Facebook. Opens in a new tab or window
Visit us on Twitter. Opens in a new tab or window
Visit us on Instagram. Opens in a new tab or window
Visit us on LinkedIn. Opens in a new tab or window
Visit us on TikTok. Opens in a new tab or window
Visit us on YouTube. Opens in a new tab or window
Subscribe for Free
About Help Center Site Map Terms of Use Privacy Policy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information Advertise with us AdChoices Accessibility
Statement
visit everydayhealthgroup.com

visit healthecareers.com/
visit medpagetoday.com
visit primeinc.org

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a
substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified
health care provider.
© 2005–2022 MedPage Today, LLC, a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved.
Medpage Today is among the federally registered trademarks of MedPage Today, LLC
and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission.


WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

If you consent, we and our partners can store and access personal information on
your device to provide a more personalised browsing experience. This is
accomplished through processing personal data collected from browsing data
stored in cookies. You can provide/withdraw consent and object to processing
based on a legitimate interest at any time by clicking on the ‘Manage
Preferences’ button.Our Privacy Policy

Personal information may include health and medical condition interest.


WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS DATA TO

Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised ads and content, ad
and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Our Partners

Reject All I Accept
More Options