writing.bobdoto.computer Open in urlscan Pro
159.223.204.176  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

POST /upvote/49617/

<form id="upvote-form" action="/upvote/49617/" method="post" style="display: inline">
  <small>
    <input hidden="" name="pk" value="49617" style="display:none">
    <input hidden="" name="title" style="display:none">
    <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="9iIJhDSRPbRPPyNbQXclt5MDtaal2ctJZ0YRcxKWS8J3djsTpbTa09rqbhS8OsJs">
    <button class="upvote-button" title="Toast this post">
      <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24" width="24" height="24" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" fill="none" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" class="css-i6dzq1">
        <polyline points="17 11 12 6 7 11"></polyline>
        <polyline points="17 18 12 13 7 18"></polyline>
      </svg>
      <small class="upvote-count">2</small>
    </button>
  </small>
</form>

Text Content

WRITING BY BOB DOTO

Essays | Zettelkasten | Weekly Email | Website | Old Blogs | Mastodon | About


INSPIRED DESTRUCTION: HOW A ZETTELKASTEN EXPLODES THOUGHTS (SO YOU CAN HAVE NEW
ONES)

13 Sep, 2023

Maintaining a Luhmann-style zettelkasten is, in part, a practice of
destabilizing someone else's structured thinking. Complex ideas developed by a
writer, once skillfully woven into a fabric of singular theses, are unwound from
their original focus in order to yield separate, "atomic" ideas that can be
reimagined, reinterpreted, and, ultimately, repurposed for new work. While on
the surface this pillaging of someone's writing may seem destructive, even an
affront to something sacred, it is actually one of the primary means by which
new ideas are developed.


IT'S ALL RHIZOMES AND INTERTEXTUALITY

Niklas Luhmann's work has for decades been largely ignored by academics in the
United States understandably enamored with the experimental writings of French
and Russian literary theorists. And yet, Luhmann's zettelkasten, if not his
theories, are well fit among the annals of postmodern thought.

Comparisons to Deleuze and Guattari's "rhizome" (a postmodern concept if ever
there was one) are fairly common, where Luhmann's nonhierarchical anti-structure
is read as a distributed network rather than a top-down categorical system. Less
common, though no less deserving, are references to Julia Kristeva's concept of
intertextuality—the idea that all written works influence and are influenced by
other written works. Or, as Kristeva not-atypically put it: "[E]ach word (text)
is an intersection of word (texts) where at least one other word (text) can be
read."1 Zettelkasten, anyone?

Speaking about the interaction of the writer and the text, Kristeva states:

> "[A]ny text is constructed as a mosaic of quotations; any text is the
> absorption and transformation of another."2

For Kristeva, all writing (even all thought) is the result of an "absorption" of
the writer into a culture of ideas where a person's subjectivity informs their
interpretation and representing (or, rather, "re-presenting") of texts. In the
case of ideas, thoughts are encountered subjectively, borrowed, taken out of
context, and recontextualized in ways that yield alternate ideas that are
themselves borrowed and recontextualized.3 Writers who use a Luhmann-style
zettelkasten, through the deconstruction of another's work, make explicit the
effects of this recontextualization by detonating the structured ideas of
previous writers, liberating these ideas from the clutches of their contexts.4
In so doing, new networks of thought are established.


HOW IT WORKS

Long-form, mainstream, non-fiction works are typically structured to reveal a
single argument or thesis (or series of single-ish arguments and theses).5 In
these works, the primary claim is constructed out of many smaller claims;
supported and organized to reveal a "proven" argument:

 * Primary Claim: The riot grrrl band, Bratmobile, was a manifestation of
   third-wave feminism.

 * Supporting Claim 1: Third-wave feminism critiqued second-wave's reinforcing
   of hetero-normative beliefs.

 * Supporting Claim 2: Bratmobile challenged prevailing hetero-normative
   conventions within the indie-punk music scene.

By using a zettelkasten, each of the above statements can be excised from the
original argument, examined on its own, and repurposed for arguments that may
have little to do with the original thesis.6 For example, while SUPPORTING CLAIM
1 is used to bolster the idea that Bratmobile was a third-wave feminist punk
band, the statement could also be used to discuss differences between second and
third-wave feminism in general. In a similar way, SUPPORTING CLAIM 2 can be used
in a thread discussing the evolution of punk in general. Even the primary claim
itself could be used to discuss not necessarily Bratmobile, but third-wave
feminism's embrace of DIY ethics. It could also be used as a foil in a
discussion about the prevalence of toxic-masculinity in 90s hardcore music.






NOT ALL THAT IS BROKEN IS LOST

At first glance, it may appear that by splitting up complex ideas into their
"atomic" building blocks one loses the original thesis. However, as the second
image shows, this need not be the case.

A note maker can reconstitute the original thesis along with its supporting
claims by bringing the deconstructed thesis into the zettelkasten, making
explicit connections between the individual ideas. For academics tasked with
examining previously written work, this kind of disassembling and reassembling
is par for the course. But, for writers who work outside academic institutions,
the so-called "rogue academics" not bound by pesky deadlines and dissertation
panels, a zettelkasten provides more.

Writers free to pursue any interest that catches their attention can leverage
the inherent plasticity of the Luhmann-style zettelkasten, by positioning
seemingly disparate ideas in such a way that they can speak with one
another—across topic, theme, genre, and context. It's in this way that writers
create the conditions for writing and thinking to explode and be exploded.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*IF YOU ENJOYED THIS PIECE, CONSIDER SIGNING UP FOR MY WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
TO LEARN MORE ABOUT ME, CLICK HERE. FOR MY FULL WEBSITE, CLICK HERE.

 1. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature
    and Art. Columbia University Press.↩

 2. Ibid.↩

 3. Professor of language and culture, Per Linell, defines "recontextualization"
    as "a dynamic transfer-and-transformation of something from one
    discourse/text-in-context...to another." See: Linell, P. (1998). "Discourse
    across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in
    professional discourse." Text and Talk. No. 18.↩

 4. Here, I am, admittedly (and intentionally), speaking in somewhat romantic
    terms. The entire premise that an idea can exist independent of its context
    is possible at best. In fact, true and ultimate "atomicity" in note-taking
    is most definitely a fallacy, especially if we accept that nothing can be
    truly independent of anything else.↩

 5. The development of complex ideas is actually much more involved. There are
    many different ways to develop a thesis. However, in its most basic, a
    thesis is a statement backed up by other statements. In effect, some
    variation of modus ponens.↩

 6. I purposefully chose "statements" to draw attention to the material thing
    stated. Ideas can of course be excised from their context, but they never
    truly lose the stink of it. Assuming otherwise would go against most
    everything I believe about how language functions.↩

#essays #zettelkasten #2023

2
Made with Bear ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ