www.newadvent.org Open in urlscan Pro
2400:52e0:1e00::1079:1  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

../utility/search.htm

<form id="searchbox_000299817191393086628:ifmbhlr-8x0" action="../utility/search.htm">
  <!-- Hidden Inputs -->
  <input type="hidden" name="safe" value="active">
  <input type="hidden" name="cx" value="000299817191393086628:ifmbhlr-8x0">
  <input type="hidden" name="cof" value="FORID:9">
  <!-- Search Box -->
  <label for="searchQuery" id="searchQueryLabel">Search:</label>
  <input id="searchQuery" name="q" type="text" size="25" aria-labelledby="searchQueryLabel">
  <!-- Submit Button -->
  <label for="submitButton" id="submitButtonLabel" class="visually-hidden">Submit Search</label>
  <input id="submitButton" type="submit" name="sa" value="Search" aria-labelledby="submitButtonLabel">
</form>

Text Content

 

Search: Submit Search



 Home   Encyclopedia   Summa   Fathers   Bible   Library 

 A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z 


Home > Catholic Encyclopedia > L > Lights


LIGHTS

Please help support the mission of New Advent and get the full contents of this
website as an instant download. Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church
Fathers, Summa, Bible and more — all for only $19.99...

Upon the subject of the liturgical use of lights, as an adjunct of the services
of the Church, something has already been said under such headings as ALTAR (IN
LITURGY), sub-title Altar-Candles; BENEDICTION OF THE BLESSED SACRAMENT;
CANDLES; CANDLESTICKS; LAMPS AND LAMPADARII. The present article will be
concerned only with the more general aspect of the question, and in particular
with the charge so often levelled against Catholicism of adopting wholesale the
ceremonial practices of the pagan world.

How far the use of lights in the daytime as an adjunct of the Liturgy can be
traced back to the second or third century A.D. is not quite easy to decide. On
the one hand, there seems to be some evidence that the Christians themselves
repudiated the practice. Although Tertullian ("Apol.", xlvi and xxxv; "De
Idololat.", xv) does not make any direct reference to the use of lights in
religious worship, still he speaks in strong terms of the uselessness of burning
lamps in the daytime as an act of piety towards the emperors. This would be
somewhat inconsistent, if the Christians themselves had been open to the same
reproach. Moreover, several of the Fathers of the fourth century might seem to
be more explicit in their condemnation of a display of lamps. For example, about
the year 303, Lactantius writes: "They [the pagans] burn lights as to one
dwelling in darkness. . . Is he to be thought in his right mind who offers for a
gift the light of candles and wax tapers to the author and giver of light? . . .
But their Gods, because they are of the earth, need light that they need not be
in darkness" ("Institut. Div.", VI, ii). In like manner, St. Gregory of
Nazianzus, towards the end of the same century, observes: "Let not our
dwelling-place blaze with visible light and resound with minstrelsy, for this
indeed is the custom of the Greek holy-month, but let us not honour God with
these things and exalt the present season with unbecoming rites, but with purity
of soul and cheerfulness of mind and with lamps which enlighten the whole body
of the Church, i.e. with divine contemplations and thoughts" (Orat., v, 35). The
rhetorical character of such passages makes it dangerous to draw inferences. It
may well be that the writers are merely protesting against the illuminations
which formed part of the ordinary religious cultus of the emperors, and wish to
state forcibly the objections against a similar practice which was beginning to
find favour among Christians. It is, at any rate certain that even earlier than
this the liturgical use of lights must have been introduced. The decree of the
Spanish Council of Illiberis, or Elvira (about A.D. 305), is too obscure to
afford a firm basis for argument (see Hefele-Leclercq, "Hist. des Conciles", I,
212). Still this prohibition, "that candles be not lighted in a cemetery during
the day, for the spirits of the saints ought not to be disquieted" (can. xxxiv),
at least shows that the practice — which we know to have been long in use among
pagans — of burning lights, for some symbolical or superstitious reason, even in
the daytime, was being adopted among the Christians also. To discuss in detail
the perplexing and seemingly inconsistent references of St. Jerome to the use of
lights would not be possible here. But two facts stand out clearly:

 * (1) that he admitted the existence of a pretty general custom of burning
   candles and lamps in honour of the martyrs, a custom which he apologizes for
   without unreservedly approving it; and
 * (2) that the saint, though he denies that there is any general practice among
   the Christians of burning lights during the daytime, still admits at least
   some instances of a purely liturgical use of light.



Thus he says: "Apart from honouring the relics of martyrs, it is the custom,
through all the Churches of the East, that when the gospels are to be read
lights are kindled, though the sun is already shining, not, indeed, to dispel
darkness, but to exhibit a token of joy . . . and that, under the figure of
bodily light, that light may be set forth of which we read in the psalter 'thy
word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my paths" (C. Vigilantium, vii). This
testimony is particularly valuable because it so clearly refutes any exclusively
utilitarian view of the use of lights in the churches.

From Eusebius, St. Paulinus of Nola, the "Peregrinatio Ætheriæ" (Pilgrimage of
Ætheria), and other authorities, we have abundant evidence that the Christians
of the fourth century, and probably earlier still, upon Easter eve and some
other solemn festivals, made a great display of lamps and candles of all kinds.
Moreover, this does not seem to have been confined to the nocturnal vigil
itself, for St. Paulinus in describing the feast of St. Felix to whom his church
was dedicated, tells us in verse how "the bright altars are crowned with lamps
thickly set. Lights are burnt, odorous with waxed papyri. They shine by night
and day; thus night is radiant with the brightness of the day, and the day
itself, bright in heavenly beauty, shines yet more with light doubled by
countless lamps" ("Poem.", xiv, "Nat." iii, in P.L., LXI, 467). Still this
poetical language may very possibly mean no more than that in a rather dark
church it was found desirable to keep the lamps burning even in daytime upon
great festivals, when there was a large concourse of people. It tells us nothing
of any use of lights which is liturgical in the stricter sense of the word. The
same may be said of various references to the festal adornment of churches with
lamps and candles which may be found in the writings of the Christian poet
Prudentius (cf. P.L., LIX, 819, 829; and LX, 300). Still, when we find in the
newly discovered "Testament of our Lord" (l. 19) an injunction regarding church
buildings, that "all places should be lighted both for a type and also for
reading", it seems clear that St. Jerome was not alone in attaching a mystical
significance to the use of lights. Hence we may infer that before the days
(about A.D. 475) of the liturgical homilist Narsai (see LAMPS AND LAMPADARII)
the use of lamps and candles around the altar during the Liturgy had become
universal.

It should be added that no great importance can be attached to the mention by
St. Paulinus of Nola, of "a perpetual light" in the church ("continuum scyphus
argenteus aptus ad usum"; cf. P.L., LXI, 539). This certainly cannot be assumed
to have been intended as a mark of respect to the Blessed Sacrament reserved for
the sick. In the days before the invention of matches the continuance of some
source of fire from which a light could be readily obtained was a matter of
great convenience. Such a perpetual light seems to have been usually kept up,
then as now, in Jewish synagogues (cf. Exodus 27:20; Leviticus 24:2), but it was
only the later Talmudists who discovered in this a purpose of honouring the
Torah, or Books of the Law, preserved in the Ark. The same utilitarian design
probably underlay any Christian practice, which, after all, is not very widely
attested, of keeping a light perpetually burning in the church.

But to return to the liturgical use of lights in the stricter sense, there are
not wanting many considerations to suggest that, despite the lack of direct
evidence, this practice is probably of very much older date than the fourth
century. To begin with, the seven-branched "candlestick", or more accurately
lamp-stand, was a permanent element in the Temple ritual at Jerusalem and more
than one Jewish festival (e.g. the Dedication feast and that of Tabernacles),
was marked by a profuse use of lights. Moreover, the Apocalypse (i, 12; iv, 5;
xi, 4), in the prominence which it gives to the mention of candlesticks and
lamps, is probably only echoing the more or less liturgical conceptions already
current at the time. Again, the fact that the Liturgy was at first no doubt
celebrated in the evening (cf. 1 Corinthians 11:21), as also the necessity that
the faithful should often assemble by stealth (as in the catacombs) or in the
early hours of the morning (cf. Pliny, "Epp", X, n. 97 — ante lucem convenire;
and Tertullian, "De Cor.", iii — antelucanis cœtibus), render it highly probable
that artificial light must have come to be regarded as an ordinary adjunct of
the Liturgy. Hence the use of lamps and candles was probably continued even when
not actually needed, just as, in more modern days, the bishop's bugia, which in
the beginning served an entirely practical purpose, has come in time to be
purely ceremonial. It is also noteworthy that early representations of the Last
Supper nearly always give prominence to the lamp, while something of the same
kind obtains in the first rude sketches of Christian altars. In any case, lamps
and chandeliers are conspicuous amongst the earliest recorded presents to
churches (see the "Liber Pontificalis", ed. Duchesne, passim; and cf. the
inventory of Cirta, A.D. 303, in Morcelli, "Africa Christiana", II, 183; and
Beissel, "Bilder aus der altchrist. Kunst", 247).



Both in ancient and modern times, the reproach has been leveled against the
Church that in her ceremonial use of lights she has taken over without scruple
the sensuous and often idolatrous practices of paganism. For this charge there
is very little real justification. To begin with, it must be evident that such
simple elements as light, music, rich attire, processions, ablutions, and
lustrations, flowers, unguents, incense, etc., belong, as it were, to the common
stock of all ceremonial, whether religious or secular. If there is to be any
solemnity of external worship at all it must include some at least of these
things, and whether we turn to the polytheistic ritual of ancient Greece and
Rome, or to the nations of the far East, or to the comparatively isolated
civilizations of the aborigines of Mexico and Peru, human striving after
impressiveness is found to manifest itself in very similar ways. A multiplicity
of lights is always in some measure joyous and decorative, and it is a principle
taught by everyday experience that marks of respect which are shown at first
with a strictly utilitarian purpose are regarded in the end as only the more
honorific if they are continued when they are plainly superfluous. Thus an
escort of torches or candle-bearers, which is almost a necessity in the dark,
and is a convenience in the twilight, becomes a formality indicative of
ceremonious respect if maintained in the full light of day. Again, since the use
of lights was so familiar to Jewish ritual, there is no sufficient ground for
regarding the Christian Church as in this respect imitative either of the
religions of Greece and Rome or of the more oriental Mithra worship. At the same
time, it seems probable enough that certain features of Christian ceremonial
were directly borrowed from Roman secular usages. For example, the later custom
that seven acolytes with candlesticks should precede the pope, when he made his
solemn entry into the church, is no doubt to be traced to a privilege which was
common under the Empire of escorting the great functionaries of the State with
torches. This right is expressly recognised in the "Notitia Dignitatum", but it
may also be found in embryo at an earlier date, when the Consul Duilius for his
victory over the Carthaginians, in the third century before Christ, obtained the
privilege of being escorted home by a torch and a flute player. But granting, as
even so conservative an historian as Cardinal Baronius is fully prepared to
grant, a certain amount of direct borrowing of pagan usages, this is no subject
of reproach to the Catholic Church. "What", he says, "is to prevent profane
things, when sanctified by the word of God, being transferred to sacred
purposes? Of such pagan rites laudably adopted for the service of the Christian
religion we have many examples. And with regard more especially to lamps and
candles, of which we are now speaking, who can reasonably find fault if those
same things which were once offered to idols are now consecrated to the honour
of the martyrs? If those lamps which were kindled in the temples on Saturdays —
not as though the gods needed light, as even Seneca points out (Ep. xv, 66), but
as a mark of veneration — are now lighted in the honour of the Mother of God? If
the candles which were formerly distributed at the Saturnalia are now identified
with the feast of the Purification of our Lady? What, I ask, is there so
surprising if holy bishops have allowed certain customs firmly rooted among
pagan peoples, and so tenaciously adhered to by them that even after their
conversion to Christianity they could not be induced to surrender them, to be
transferred to the worship of the true God?" (Baronius, "Annales", ad ann. 58,
n. 77).

With regard to the use of lights in direct connexion with the Holy Sacrifice of
the Mass, we find the whole system of portable lights elaborated in the earliest
of the "Ordines Romani". Indeed, St. Jerome's plain reference, already quoted,
to the carrying of lights at the Gospel, seems probably to take the practice
back to at least three hundred years earlier, even if we may not appeal, as many
authorities have done, to the words of the Acts of the Apostles (xx, 7-8): "And
on the first day of the week, when we were assembled to break bread, Paul
discoursed with them. . . . And there were a great number of lamps in the upper
chamber where we were assembled." It does not seem to have been customary to
place lights upon the altar itself before the eleventh century, but the "Ordines
Romani" and other documents make it clear that, many centuries before this,
lights were carried in procession by acolytes (see ACOLYTE), and set down upon
the ground or held in the hand while Mass was being offered and the Gospel read.
A decree of the so-called Fourth Council of Carthage directs that in the
ordination of an acolyte a candlestick is to be given him, but this collection
of canons does not belong, as was once supposed, to the year 398, but to the
time of St. Cæsarius of Arles (about A.D. 512). A little later, i.e. in 636, St.
Isidore of Seville (Etymol., VII, xii, n. 29) speaks quite explicitly on the
point: "Acolytes", he says, "in Greek, are called Ceroferarii in Latin, from
their carrying wax candles when the Gospel is to be read or the sacrifice to be
offered. For then lights are kindled by them, and carried, not to drive away
darkness, as the sun is shining, but for a sign of joy, that under the form of
material light may be represented that Light of which we read in the Gospel:
That was the true light." It was only at a later date that various synodal
decrees required the lighting of first one candle, and afterwards of two, during
the time of the celebration of Mass.

The use of lights in baptism, a survival of which still remains in the candle
given to the catechumen, with the words: "Receive this burning light and keep
thy baptism so as to be without blame", etc., is also of great antiquity. It is
probably to be connected in a very immediate way with the solemnities of the
Easter vigil, when the font was blessed, and when, after careful preparation and
a long series of "scrutinies", the catechumens were at last admitted to the
reception of the Sacrament. Dom Morin (Revue Bénédictine, VIII, 20; IX, 392) has
given excellent reason for believing that the ceremonial of the paschal candle
may be traced back to at least the year 382 in the lifetime of St. Jerome.
Moreover the term photisthentes (illuminati), so constantly applied to the newly
baptized in early writings, most probably bears some reference to the
illumination which, as we know from many sources, marked the night of Holy
Saturday. Thus St. Ambrose (De Laps. Virg., v, 19), speaking of this occasion,
mentions "the blazing light of the neophytes", and St. Gregory of Nazianzus, in
his great "Sermon on Holy Baptism", tells the candidates that "the lamps which
you will kindle are a symbol of the illumination with which we shall meet the
Bridegroom, with the lamps of our faith shining, not carelessly lulled to sleep"
(Orat., xl, 46; cf. xlv, 2).

Again, the pagan use of lights at funerals seems to have been taken over by the
Church as a harmless piece of ceremonial to which a Christian colour might
easily be given. The early evidence upon this point in the writings of the
Fathers is peculiarly abundant, beginning with what Eusebius tells us of the
lying in state of the body of the Emperor Constantine: "They lighted candles on
golden stands around it, and afforded a wonderful spectacle to the beholders,
such as never was seen under the sun since the earth was made" (Vita. Const.,
iv, 66). Similarly, St. Jerome tells us of the obsequies of St. Paula in 386:
"She was borne to the grave by the hands of bishops, who even put their
shoulders under the bier, while other pontiffs carried lamps and candles before
her" (Ad Eustoch., ep. cviii, n. 29). So, again in the West, at the funeral of
St. Germanus of Auxerre, "The number of lights beat back the rays of the sun,
and maintained their brightness even through the day" (Constantius, "Vita S.
Germani", II, 24).



It is also certain that, from a very early period, lamps and candles were burnt
around the bodies, and then, by a natural transition, before the relics, of the
martyrs. How far this was merely a development of the use of lights in funerals,
or how far it sprang from the earlier pagan custom of displaying a number of
lamps as a tribute of honour to the emperor or others, it is not easy to decide.
The practice, as we have seen, was known to St. Jerome, and is with some
reservation defended by him. This burning of lights before shrines, relics, and
statues naturally assumed great developments in the Middle Ages. Bequests to
various "lights" in the churches which the testator desired to benefit generally
occupy a considerable space in medieval wills, more particularly in England.

Upon the symbolism of ecclesiastical lights much has been written by medieval
liturgists from Amalarius downwards. That all such lights typify Jesus Christ,
Who is the Light of the World, is a matter of general agreement, while the older
text of the "Exultet" rendered familiar the thought that the wax produced by
virgin bees was a figure of the human body which Christ derived from His
immaculate Mother. To this it was natural to add that the wick was emblematic of
Christ's human soul, while the flame represented His Godhead. But the medieval
liturgists also abound in a variety of other symbolic expositions, which
naturally are not always quite consistent with one another.




SOURCES

BÄUMER in Kirchenlex., s.v. Kerze; SCHROD, ibid., s.v. Licht; SCUDAMORE in Dict.
Christ. Antiq., s.v.; BARONIUS, Annales ad ann., 58; THALHOFER, Liturgik, I
(Freiburg, 1883), 666-83; MÜHLBAUER, Geschichte und Bedeutung der Wachslichter
bei den kirchlichen Functionen(Augsburg, 1874); STALEY, Studies in Ceremonial
(London, 1901), 169-94.


ABOUT THIS PAGE

APA citation. Thurston, H. (1910). Lights. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New
York: Robert Appleton Company. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09244b.htm

MLA citation. Thurston, Herbert. "Lights." The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 9.
New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910.
<http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09244b.htm>.

Transcription. This article was transcribed for New Advent by Douglas J. Potter.
Dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ.

Ecclesiastical approbation. Nihil Obstat. October 1, 1910. Remy Lafort, Censor.
Imprimatur. +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York.

Contact information. The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight. My email address
is webmaster at newadvent.org. Regrettably, I can't reply to every letter, but I
greatly appreciate your feedback — especially notifications about typographical
errors and inappropriate ads.

Copyright © 2023 by New Advent LLC. Dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

CONTACT US | ADVERTISE WITH NEW ADVENT