openpublichealthjournal.com Open in urlscan Pro
44.195.233.228  Public Scan

URL: https://openpublichealthjournal.com/VOLUME/15/ELOCATOR/e187494452207280/FULLTEXT/
Submission: On November 25 via api from US — Scanned from CA

Form analysis 8 forms found in the DOM

Name: defaultQuickSearchPOST /search.php

<form action="/search.php" name="defaultQuickSearch" onsubmit="return validateForm()" method="post">
  <fieldset>
    <legend class="sr-only">Quick Search anywhere</legend>
    <div class="input-group option-0   animation-underline">
      <label for="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac010" class="sr-only">Enter Search Term</label>
      <input type="search" id="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac010" autocomplete="off" placeholder="Enter Search Term" data-auto-complete-max-words="7" data-auto-complete-max-chars="32" data-contributors-conf="3" data-topics-conf="3"
        data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-history-items-conf="3" value="" class="quick-search__input form-control autocomplete" name="name">
    </div>
  </fieldset>
  <input type="hidden" id="advanced-search__input--type-1" name="type" value="TitleKeywordAbstract" class="form-control advanced-search__input--type animation-underline">
  <input type="hidden" id="advanced-search__input--type-2" name="article_type" value="%%" class="form-control advanced-search__input--type animation-underline">
  <div class="advanced-search__buttons d-flex align-items-center justify-content-end pt-3 mt-n3 ">
    <!-- <input id='advanced-search-submit' type='submit' class='btn btn-primary text-uppercase'></input> -->
  </div>
</form>

Name: publicationQuickSearchGET /search.php

<form action="/search.php" name="publicationQuickSearch" method="get">
  <fieldset>
    <legend class="sr-only">Quick Search in Journals</legend>
    <div class="input-group option-1 option-journal  animation-underline">
      <label for="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac011" class="sr-only">Enter Search Term</label>
      <input type="text" id="advanced-search__input--keyword-1" name="search" autocomplete="off" placeholder="Enter Search Term" data-auto-complete-max-words="7" data-auto-complete-max-chars="32" data-contributors-conf="3" data-topics-conf="3"
        data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-history-items-conf="3" value="" class="inp-box quick-search__input form-control autocomplete">
    </div>
  </fieldset>
</form>

Name: publicationQuickSearchGET /search.php

<form action="/search.php" name="publicationQuickSearch" method="get">
  <fieldset>
    <legend class="sr-only">Quick Search in Journals</legend>
    <div class="input-group option-2 option-journal  animation-underline">
      <label for="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac012" class="sr-only">Enter Search Term</label>
      <input type="search" id="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac012" name="AllField" autocomplete="off" placeholder="Enter Search Term" data-auto-complete-max-words="7" data-auto-complete-max-chars="32" data-contributors-conf="3"
        data-topics-conf="3" data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-history-items-conf="3" value="" class="quick-search__input form-control autocomplete">
      <input type="hidden" name="SeriesKey" value="sciadv">
    </div>
  </fieldset>
</form>

Name: publicationQuickSearchGET /search.php

<form action="/search.php" name="publicationQuickSearch" method="get">
  <fieldset>
    <legend class="sr-only">Quick Search in Journals</legend>
    <div class="input-group option-3 option-journal  animation-underline">
      <label for="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac013" class="sr-only">Enter Search Term</label>
      <input type="search" id="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac013" name="AllField" autocomplete="off" placeholder="Enter Search Term" data-auto-complete-max-words="7" data-auto-complete-max-chars="32" data-contributors-conf="3"
        data-topics-conf="3" data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-history-items-conf="3" value="" class="quick-search__input form-control autocomplete">
      <input type="hidden" name="SeriesKey" value="sciimmunol">
    </div>
  </fieldset>
</form>

Name: publicationQuickSearchGET /search.php

<form action="/search.php" name="publicationQuickSearch" method="get">
  <fieldset>
    <legend class="sr-only">Quick Search in Journals</legend>
    <div class="input-group option-4 option-journal  animation-underline">
      <label for="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac014" class="sr-only">Enter Search Term</label>
      <input type="search" id="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac014" name="AllField" autocomplete="off" placeholder="Enter Search Term" data-auto-complete-max-words="7" data-auto-complete-max-chars="32" data-contributors-conf="3"
        data-topics-conf="3" data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-history-items-conf="3" value="" class="quick-search__input form-control autocomplete">
      <input type="hidden" name="SeriesKey" value="scirobotics">
    </div>
  </fieldset>
</form>

Name: publicationQuickSearchGET /search.php

<form action="/search.php" name="publicationQuickSearch" method="get">
  <fieldset>
    <legend class="sr-only">Quick Search in Journals</legend>
    <div class="input-group option-5 option-journal  animation-underline">
      <label for="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac015" class="sr-only">Enter Search Term</label>
      <input type="search" id="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac015" name="AllField" autocomplete="off" placeholder="Enter Search Term" data-auto-complete-max-words="7" data-auto-complete-max-chars="32" data-contributors-conf="3"
        data-topics-conf="3" data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-history-items-conf="3" value="" class="quick-search__input form-control autocomplete">
      <input type="hidden" name="SeriesKey" value="signaling">
    </div>
  </fieldset>
</form>

Name: publicationQuickSearchGET /search.php

<form action="/search.php" name="publicationQuickSearch" method="get">
  <fieldset>
    <legend class="sr-only">Quick Search in Journals</legend>
    <div class="input-group option-6 option-journal  animation-underline">
      <label for="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac016" class="sr-only">Enter Search Term</label>
      <input type="search" id="AllField9ea9b667-c3ce-40d1-870b-f7e001bbac016" name="AllField" autocomplete="off" placeholder="Enter Search Term" data-auto-complete-max-words="7" data-auto-complete-max-chars="32" data-contributors-conf="3"
        data-topics-conf="3" data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-history-items-conf="3" value="" class="quick-search__input form-control autocomplete">
      <input type="hidden" name="SeriesKey" value="stm">
    </div>
  </fieldset>
</form>

Name: citPOST

<form name="cit" method="post">
  <div class="select-container">
    <select id="select_format" name="format" class="frmt js__slcInclude" style="padding: 7px; color: #595959; border: 1px solid #7f7f7f;">
      <option value="" selected="selected">Please select one from the list</option>
      <option value="ris">RIS</option>
      <option value="endnote">EndNote</option>
      <option value="bibtex">BibTex</option>
    </select>
  </div>
  <input type="submit" name="submit" class="form-button" value="EXPORT CITATION" style="margin-top:10px" disabled="">
  <script>
    const formInput = document.getElementById("select_format");
    const formButton = document.querySelector(".form-button");
    // the default state is 'disabled'
    formButton.disabled = true;
    // alternative is to use "change" - explained below
    formInput.addEventListener("change", buttonState);

    function buttonState() {
      if (document.querySelector(".frmt").value === "") {
        formButton.disabled = true; // return disabled as true whenever the input field is empty
      } else {
        formButton.disabled = false; // enable the button once the input field has content
      }
    }
  </script>
</form>

Text Content

An Integrated Smoking Cessation Intervention in the Primary Care Service System:
An Intervention Mapping
 * 
 * Home
 * Editorial Board


 * 
 * 


Quick Search anywhere
Enter Search Term

Quick Search in Journals
Enter Search Term
Quick Search in Journals
Enter Search Term
Quick Search in Journals
Enter Search Term
Quick Search in Journals
Enter Search Term
Quick Search in Journals
Enter Search Term
Quick Search in Journals
Enter Search Term
Advanced Search Search
 * Home

About Us

 * About the Journal
 * About the Publisher
 * Editorial Board
 * FAQs
   
 * Open Access Policy
 * Open Url Guidelines

ETHICAL GUIDELINES

 * Allegations from Whistleblowers
 * Fabricating and Stating False Information
 * Plagiarism Prevention
 * Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
 * Publishing Ethics
 * Research Misconduct

FOR EDITORS & REVIEWERS

 * Editorial Management
 * Editorial Policies
 * Ensuring Content Integrity
 * Ethical Guidelines for New Editors
 * Guest Editor Guidelines
 * Peer Review Workflow
 * Publication Process
 * Guidelines For Peer Reviewers

FOR AUTHORS

 * Archiving Policies
 * Article Processing Charges
 * Author Benefits
 * Authorship
 * Bentham Manuscript Processing System
 * Institutional Membership
 * Instructions for Authors
 * Manuscript Transfer Facility
 * Special Fee Waivers and Discounts



 * Submit Manuscript





 * Terms and Conditions
 * Privacy Policy

 * Home
 * Home
 * ABOUT US
   About the Journal About the Publisher Editorial Board FAQs Open Access Policy
   Open Url Guidelines
 * ETHICAL GUIDELINES
   Allegations from Whistleblowers Conflict of Interest Fabricating and Stating
   False Information Plagiarism Prevention Post Publication Discussions and
   Corrections Publishing Ethics Research Misconduct
 * FOR EDITORS & REVIEWERS
   Editorial Policies Ensuring Content Integrity Ethical Guidelines for New
   Editors Guest Editor Guidelines Peer Review Workflow Publication Process
   Responsibilities of Editorial Board Reviewers Guidelines
   
 * FOR AUTHORS
   Archiving Policies ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGES Author Benefits Authorship
   Bentham Manuscript Processing System Institutional Membership Instructions
   for Authors Manuscript Transfer Facility Special Fee Waivers and Discounts

Home Volume 15 e187494452207280
Back to Volume 15

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.


RESEARCH ARTICLE
Share on



AN INTEGRATED SMOKING CESSATION INTERVENTION IN THE PRIMARY CARE SERVICE SYSTEM:
AN INTERVENTION MAPPING

Kamollabhu Thanomsat1

E-MAIL ADDRESS OF DR. KAMOLLABHU THANOMSAT

×

yuni_jintana@hotmail.com


Jintana Yunibhand1 , *

E-MAIL ADDRESS OF DR. JINTANA YUNIBHAND

×

yuni_jintana@hotmail.com


and Sunida Preechawong1

E-MAIL ADDRESS OF DR. SUNIDA PREECHAWONG

×

yuni_jintana@hotmail.com


Authors Info & Affiliations
The Open Public Health Journal • 28 Sep 2022 • RESEARCH ARTICLE • DOI:
10.2174/18749445-v15-e2207280

PREVIOUS ARTICLE

|


Next

NEXT ARTICLE


METRICS


DOWNLOADS11,803

 * Last 6 Months11,803
 * Last 12 Months11,803

View all metrics
Previous Article | Next Article
 * ABSTRACT
 * INTRODUCTION
 * MATERIALS AND METHODS
 * RESULTS
 * DISCUSSION
 * CONCLUSION
 * LIMITATIONS
 * ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
 * HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
 * CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
 * STANDARDS OF REPORTING
 * AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS
 * FUNDING
 * CONFLICT OF INTEREST
 * REFERENCES


ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND:

Smoking cessation is beneficial for smokers of all ages. Moreover, smokers who
quit tobacco use benefit from COVID-19 risk avoidance.


OBJECTIVE:

This project aims to develop a smoking cessation intervention protocol in the
primary care service system.


METHODS:

Intervention Mapping guidelines for health promotion planning program was used
as an instruction includes 1) need assessment, 2) aim determination, 3)
selecting theory-based approaches selection and practical strategies and
intervention design, 4) intervention development, 5) planning the implementation
of the program and 6) planning the evaluation.


RESULTS:

According to the needs, smoking cessation behavior was indicated as an outcome
of the intervention. The socio-ecological model (Fig. 1) and the
transtheoretical model were performed as the theoretical underpinning of the
intervention. Moreover, the proactive multisession telephone counseling
integrated with the smoking cessation service in the primary care service was
used as an intervention for smokers. The average quit attempts after the quit
date were 2.13 times (SD = 1.33), with an abstinence rate of 88.24 percent,
according to early findings among the experimental group 30 days after the quit
date.


CONCLUSION:

An intervention mapping can be used as a guideline to develop smoking cessation
in the primary care setting. This study provides the smoking cessation protocol
delivered for Thai smokers, particularly in the primary care service system, to
promote sustainable well-being among Thais.

Keyword: Smoking cessation, Primary care, Intervention mapping, Smoking status,
Telephone counseling, Smokers.




1. INTRODUCTION

Tobacco use is currently one of the most serious global health issues, with
Thailand being no exception [1]. Moreover, smokers who decide to quit tobacco
use benefit from COVID-19 risk avoidance and decrease the mortality rate from
complications related to COVID-19 [2]. A smoking cessation service system in
Thailand has been implemented by recommendations of the World Health
Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHOFCTC) Article 14 [3].
Even though there are many efforts to provide smoking cessation services, the
quantity of smokers who can quit smoking successfully has been lower than the
standard indicator of Thailand. However, Thailand's earlier smoking cessation
program for smokers was compartmentalization, which was given by healthcare
providers. It is indicated that there are a lot of weak points and challenges in
the existing smoking cessation system. These issues and challenges must be
adequately addressed to achieve Thailand's national indicator for tobacco
control [4].

Fig. (1). The socio-ecological model [7].
OPEN IN VIEWER

To offer smoking cessation in the primary care setting, nurses play crucial
roles in identifying smokers, finding out the most suitable strategies for each
smoker, and monitoring the expected outcomes of provided care [5, 6]. Moreover,
they usually appraise and comprehend the context facilitating smoking cessation
accurately. Significantly, they have worked as coordinators among the related
organizations. However, the most appropriate theory underpinning smoking
cessation implementation in primary care has been inconclusive. Hence, this
paper proposes a strategy for applying the socio-ecological model (SEM) proposed
by McLeroy Bibeau [7] in accordance with the intervention development guidelines
[8] to reach the strategic plan for tobacco control indicators of Thailand
National. The SEM viewpoint focuses on the association between the environment
encompassing person and health problem by dividing into five levels. Therefore,
the SEM has been performed for explaining the interaction between hazard
behavior and the crucial environments, particularly smoking behavior.
Furthermore, the transtheoretical model (TTM) [9] was used as the theoretical
support for the outcome identification-smoking status.


2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the SEM [7] and the TTM [9] as theoretical support for outcome
identification-smoking status, as well as the Intervention Mapping [8, 10]
guidelines to develop a smoking cessation intervention program in the primary
care system. As shown in the illustration, the model consists of six steps.


2.1. STEP 1: ASSESSING THE NEEDS

A systematic review and meta-analysis study was performed to investigate the
effectiveness of the existing smoking cessation services in the Thai primary
health care setting. Mixed automated and manual search strategies were employed.
The databases from January 1993 to June 2018 were used: CINAHL, PubMed,
ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and PUBMED. A combination of the constructs
“smoking cessation”, “tobacco control”, “tobacco cessation”, “intervention”,
“counseling”, “motivational interviewing”, “quit”, “stop”, “abstinence” and
related keywords were searched in order to certify comprehensive coverage of
published papers.

We determined the eligible studies to catch both meaningful and methodological
attributes. The coding emphasized the research design, purpose of the study,
factor associated with the attributes of study participants, nature of the
ordinary implementation and comparison, follow-up, intensity, and outcome
assessment. The risk of bias was assessed by The Cochrane Collaboration tool
[11] to investigate the quality of the selected papers. Then, we conducted
meta-analyses using Review Manager (RevMan5.3, The Cochrane Collaboration,
Oxford, England) [11].

The findings revealed that the effectiveness of the existing smoking cessation
services in the Thai primary health care setting was limited. Previous studies
have shown that only 10% of smokers were able to quit smoking after six months
overall [12]. In other words, the effectiveness of existing smoking cessation
services was assessed for each setting using a six-month quit rate as an
indicator: 1) 18% for smoking cessation clinics in the hospitals [13], 2) 1% for
Quit for King project [12], 3) 24.5% for The SMART Quit Clinic (Pharsai Clinic)
in Ubon Ratchathani University [14] and 4) 37% for Thailand National Quitline
(TNQ) [15]. Therefore, it is believed that primary healthcare providers' tobacco
cessation services should be better promoted, remarkably increasing usage of
existing smoking cessation services.

Approximately three-fourths of Thai smokers have not used tobacco cessation
services [1], particularly in the primary healthcare setting. Additionally, the
TNQ [15] reported that less than 10% of Thai smokers received smoking cessation
services by the TNQ. Furthermore, approximately two-fifths of clients living in
Bangkok and the central region of Thailand and most smokers were referred by the
secondary and tertiary hospitals. Also, only 0.29% of customers were recognized
by the TNQ's services information from sources of primary healthcare. The
findings reflected that most smokers living in rural areas had not accessed the
smoking cessation service provided by the TNQ. Because there are numerous
hurdles to smoking cessation services for smokers in the community. As a result,
barriers to smoking cessation service use in primary care-the smoking cessation
service system was not blatant-should be found to raise the number of smokers
using the existing services, notably the referral system to the TNQ. The
meta-analyses demonstrated that smoking cessation advising utilizing
multisession proactive stage-matched telephone counseling directing was the best
procedure for smoking cessation on 7-day Point Prevalence of Abstinence (PPA)
when contrasted and no treatment or regular consideration. Alternately,
different intercessions brought about nonsignificant contrasts between the trial
and control gatherings. In synopsis, phone counseling was the most appropriate
methodology for working with smoking suspension in grown-up smokers in the
primary care setting. More research is needed to determine the optimal
intervention length, force, and frequency for assisting smokers in quitting in
primary care [16].


2.2. STEP 2: DETERMINING THE AIMS OF THE INTERVENTION

In the second procedure, quit rate outcomes were determined in the prior
procedure as well as the practical goals were drawn to realize these outcomes.
Then, we compared each of the practical goals between the most crucial and
variable elements extracted in the former procedure, and a matrix of change
goals was created by intersecting practical goals with the determinants.
Finally, quasi-experimental research was selected as a research design in this
study. The goal of the intervention is to see how an integrated smoking
cessation service model affects smoking status in community smokers by comparing
the experimental and control groups' 7-day PPA scores at six months.


2.3. STEP 3: SELECTING THEORY-BASED APPROACHES AND PRACTICAL STRATEGIES AND
INTERVENTION DESIGN

The SEM is a social and environmental theory [7]. It involves systems of
individual and environmental relationships, complex relationships between
individuals living in the system, and interdependent relationships between
members or system components. If any part of the system changes, it affects
other parts of the system as well. Applying this idea to health promotion
classifies the environmental factors influencing health behavior into five
levels: intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public
policy.

From past projects, it was found that the SEM was used to describe health
behaviors and to implement health problem-solving work with different models.
With links between biological factors, behavior, and sociology, the importance
of using the SEM for promoting the appropriate health behavior focuses on
modifying individual factors and social environments by implementing five levels
of modifications that require a wide variety of strategies and operations. It is
an inclusive and complete health promotion model that can be used both to
describe behavior and guide management and practice.

The SEM and the theory of behavior change procedures were applied to develop an
integrated smoking cessation model for the primary health care system. There are
different levels of development:

2.3.1. THE POLICY LEVELS AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL AND THE ORGANIZATION LEVEL

Consisted of 1) development of the potential capacity of the Community Health
Workers (CHWs) in helping to quit smoking, including 1) offering brief advice to
promote the smokers quit through home visits, 2) referring the smokers’
information for receiving the intensive staged-based [17] proactive telephone
counseling for smoking cessation by the TNQ, and 3) providing follow-up for
preventing relapse. The CHWs, a very crucial health care volunteer in Thailand,
have a responsibility to take care of people in the village. Moreover, nurses
working in the Health Promoting Hospitals (HPHs)- the hospital in the primary
care setting in Thailand were trained for supervising the CHWs following the
study protocol by the researcher (Fig. 2).

2.3.2. INDIVIDUAL AND INTERPERSONAL LEVELS

Consisted of 1) delivering brief advice to promote the smokers quit through home
visits, 2) referring the smokers’ information for receiving the intensive
staged-based [17] proactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation by the
TNQ counselors via the mobile application, and 3) providing follow-up for
preventing relapse. An overview of the application of the SEM is shown in Table
1.

The TTM [9] has been practicing behavioral change, especially smoking cessation.
This model helps the researchers understand how to provide the specific
intervention in each stage. People could use different techniques to change
their behaviors in each stage depending on the surrounding context. Generally,
the TTM has been used to explain changing behaviors, serving the specific
technique to change unexpected behaviors [17]. Ten processes of change can be
divided into two higher factors labeled cognitive/experiential and behavioral.
Also, self-efficacy and decisional balance (i.e., pros and cons) are crucial
components of the TTM [18], and these elements appear to help clarify why health
behavior changes occur. Moreover, decisional balance is is associated with the
perceived “pros” (merits) and “cons” (demerits) between ongoing current
behaviors and changing behaviors. Decisional balance demonstrates weighing the
advantage and disadvantages of changing through vigorous behaviors and is
essential for beginning phase movement [9].

Table 1.
Application of an ecological model framework to develop an integrated smoking
cessation model in a primary health care system.

S.No Level Intervention 1 Community, organization, and policy   1. Developing
the potential capacity of the CHWs to help quit smoking through brief smoking
cessation advice, referring the smokers’ information for receiving intensive
counseling for smoking cessation by the TNQ, and home visits to prevent relapse.
  2. Developing the potential capacity of nurses working in the HPHs in
supervising the CHWs following the study protocol.
  3. Providing intensive counseling for smoking cessation by the TNQ counselors
2 Individual and interpersonal   1. The CHWs provide brief advice to quit
smoking to raise motivation to quit smoking
  2. The TNQ counselors provide intensive counseling for smoking cessation by
phone, and the CHWs visit home to prevent relapse.

Expand for more
Collapse
OPEN IN VIEWER

Finally, the TTM [9] was used as the theoretical support for the outcome
identification-smoking status. The study participants were asked about their
quit attempts 7, 30, 90, and 180 days after the quit date. Additionally, 7-day
PPA at 180 days after the quit date was used to identify smoking status using
self-report. On the one hand, smokers participating in the program can stop
smoking for seven consecutive days at 30, 90, and 180 days after quitting
tobacco use.

Fig. (2). The study protocol.
OPEN IN VIEWER


2.4. STEP 4: INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT

We designed the smoking cessation program's significant components in accordance
with the literature review and set a meeting with stakeholders, including two
sessions:

2.4.1. SMOKING CESSATION SERVICE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT TRAINING CAPACITY

Smoking cessation services were designed by the researchers and related
organizations, and the CHWs helped researchers build their smoking cessation
capability. Furthermore, nurses working in the HPHs were preparing to supervise
CHWs who were following the study protocol.

2.4.2. INTEGRATED SMOKING CESSATION SERVICE DELIVERY

In this step, the researchers and nurses working in the HPHs work as supervisors
to facilitate the CHWs, whereas the CHWs worked as research assistants. Firstly,
the CHWs provided brief advice for smokers through home visiting. After the
participant was willing to join the project, the CHWs collected the data. Then,
the smokers’ data was sent to the TNQ to receive proactive multisession
intensive telephone counseling using Stage-match intervention by the TNQ
counselors. Next, the CHWs offered follow-up for preventing relapse at 7, 14,
30, 90, and 180 days after the quit date. The smokers have measured quit
attempts at 7, 30, 90, and 180 days after the quit date. Finally, the 7-day PPA
was evaluated at 30, 90, and 180 days after the quit date for the study
participants. After completing the training program, the CHWs and research
assistants were tested on their knowledge of smoking cessation services and
smoking cessation support behavior and to ensure the intervention's validity.
Then, the study protocol, study manual, research instruments, smoking cessation
assisting video, recording tobacco use, giving brief advice, and equipment were
developed. After that, five experts asked the research instruments to approve
for content validity. Furthermore, all instruments were revised following the
experts’ recommendations. Then the research project was asked for approval by
the Ethics Sub-Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects, Nakhon Pathom
Rajabhat University (ECNP) (COA No. 016/2021). Before conducting the study
intervention, the study protocol, information, and informed consent form were
considered ethical to assure confidentiality and anonymity.


2.5. STEP 5: PLANNING THE INTERVENTION OF THE PROGRAM

After the ECNP approved the study proposal, the researchers contacted the
related organizations in the selected areas for reviewing participant’s data and
data collection. Then, the researchers contacted the nurses working in the
selected HPHs to screen the participants who met the name lists' criteria. The
community smokers and the CHWs who meet the inclusion criteria from the name
lists reported by the Health-promoting hospital were assigned to the study
participants.

The participants were smokers from four communities, selected from one province
in the central region of Thailand, Nakhon Pathom Province. It was because the
smoking prevalence in this province [19] had still been higher than the
indicator of Thailand National Strategic Plan for Tobacco control. Moreover,
this province could represent all provinces since it was combined with urban and
rural areas. Nakhon Pathom comprised seven districts. The Mueng Nakhon Pathom
district was specifically be selected for consideration in this study. Moreover,
this area is a good representative of the current smoking situation. It consists
of eighteen HPHs. The HPHs were selected by a simple random sampling technique.
Finally, two HPHs were randomly chosen to represent HPHs. Then, the selected
HPHs were randomly assigned into experimental and control groups, with two
communities in each group. To avoid the threats of validity, the experiment and
control group participants were divided into two groups using a matched-pairs
design at the beginning.

The research instruments consist of two parts:

Firstly, the intervention instrument, which is a Smoking cessation program,
includes 1) study protocol, 2) Smoking cessations handbook for the Community
nurses and the CHWs are composed of: 2.1) knowledge associated with smoking
cessation service includes Tobacco hazard and impact on individual health,
second hand, third-hand smoker, smoking cessation process, smoking cessation
treatment, helping smokers base on staged match intervention starting by brief
intervention and relapse prevention and 2.2) smoking cessation service skill.

Secondly, instruments for data collection are demonstrated as follows:

Demographic data of participants includes 1) Demographic data of smokers
consists of gender, age, educational level, occupation, underlying disease, type
of tobacco, and smoking duration, 2) Demographic data of the CHW consists of
gender, age, academic level, occupation, the CHW experience, acquiring knowledge
regarding cigarettes, and smoking cessation assistance experience.

The heavy smoking index (HSI) [20] includes two questions to examine the level
of nicotine dependence. The nicotine addiction level was interpreted by the
score as follows: low addiction (0-2), moderate addiction (3-4), and high
addiction (5-6).

The staging questionnaire [21] consists of five questions based on the stage of
change model, with the goal of determining the smokers' stage of change in the
community: “Are you seriously thinking of quitting smoking?” The stage of change
was interpreted by the score as follows: 1) No, not at all thinking about
quitting (pre-contemplation), 2) Yes, within the next six months
(contemplation), 3) Yes, within the next 30 days (preparation), 4) Yes, I quit
within the last six months (action), and 5) No, I quit more than six months ago
(maintenance).

Quit attempt measurement [22] includes a question that includes a question: “How
many times have you stopped smoking for 24 hours or longer?”.

Lastly, the Validity check instrument, two instruments for appraising the CHWs'
capacities for offering smoking cessation service, was tested as a validity
check as follows:

Knowledge Associated with Smoking Cessation (KASC) includes a set of questions
developed by the researcher. It was contained with five dimensions including 1)
Tobacco hazard and impact on individual health, second hand, third-hand smoker
2) benefits of smoking cessation, 3) brief advice for smoking cessation process,
4) nicotine withdrawal and solutions, and 5) referring system to the smoking
cessation service and arrange to follow up methods. It consisted of 25 items
with a dichotomous answer for choosing: “correct or incorrect” (correct = 1
point, incorrect = 0 point). The KASC in the Thai version obtained good content
validity; the reliability using Cronbach’s alpha was 0.80 [23]. The content
validity index was 0.83-1.00 for item-content validity index (I-CVI), 0.92 for
Scale-level CVI/universal agreement (S-CVI/UA), and 0.98 for Scale-level
CVI/average proportion (S-CVI/Ave) [23].

Smoking cessation assistance behavior (SCAB) includes a set of questions
developed by the researcher. This instrument was used for reporting smoking
cessation assistance behaviors among the CHWs by themselves. The procedures for
smoking cessation assistance behavior include six steps as follows: 1) building
relationships and assessing motivation to quit smoking, 2) convincing smokers to
quit by providing brief advice for smoking cessation, 3) referring to TNQ, and
4) offering follow up to prevent relapse among smokers after quitting smoking.
The 27 Likert scale items with five categories (Always, Usually, Sometimes,
Rarely, and Never) were used; higher scores indicated more frequent smoking
cessation services. It was rated on the frequency of determining smoking
cessation assistance behavior as a 5-point scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Always).
The SCAB in the Thai version obtained good content validity; the reliability
using Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88 [23]. The content validity index was 0.83-1.00
for item-content validity index (I-CVI), 0.93 for Scale-level CVI/universal
agreement (S-CVI/UA), and 0.99 for Scale-level CVI/average proportion
(S-CVI/Ave) [23].


2.6. STEP 6: PLANNING THE EVALUATION

Smoking cessation assistance capability and knowledge associated with smoking
cessation among the CHWs have been validated in this program by questionnaires
developed by the researchers. Five experts confirmed content validity. Then, the
reliability was tested by data collecting in 30 CHWs working in another
sub-district.

This project was a quasi-experimental design that organized the subjects;
smokers were randomly allocated into two groups-experimental and control groups.
The sample size of smokers was calculated using G*Power Program version 3.1.9.4,
with 72 participants in each group.


3. RESULTS

In order to achieve the goal of smoking cessation intervention, the study
protocol was drawn after revising following the suggestion of experts. Nurses
who work in the primary care system need to follow the study procedures, which
are as follows:

Firstly, CHWs were trained in smoking cessation, and nurses working in HPHs were
trained to supervise CHWs who followed the researchers' study protocol.

Secondly, smokers were given a brief intervention by CHWs who came to their
homes to build their intention to quit, motivation to quit, and quit attempts,
as well as persuade them to participate in the tobacco cessation service system.
Then, the participant’s data were sent to the TNQ via the mobile application by
the CHWs in order to receive proactive multisession intensive telephone
counseling using stage-matched intervention by the TNQ counselors.

Thirdly, the study participants were delivered follow-up by the CHWs at 7, 14,
30, 90, and 180 days after the quit date in order to prevent relapse.

Finally, the study participants were measured the 7-day PPA at 30, 90, and 180
days after the quit date, as well as reported quit attempts at 7, 30, 90, and
180 days following the quit date.

The control group received usual care, which was defined as smoking cessation
services delivered by CHWs trained under the Quit for King program, as reported
by the HPHs.

Then, they delivered brief advice for the smokers for approximately 1-3 minutes,
aiming to increase intention to quit by home visiting, and/or the smokers were
referred to the existing smoking cessation service system of the HPHs, such as
using the traditional Thai therapy, 0.5% Sodium nitrate mouth wash.

This paper presents the preliminary findings among the participants in the
experimental group 30 days after the quit date. The result showed that the
average quit attempts after the quit date was 2.13 times (SD = 1.33). Moreover,
the abstinence rate of study participants was 88.24%.


3.1. DATA ANALYSIS

Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to analyze the probability of the
outcomes between the experimental and control groups after balancing the
covariates from the literature review [24], including age [25], the total number
of years for education [26], underlying disease [27], smoking duration [28], and
nicotine addiction level (HSI score) [29].


4. DISCUSSION

Smoking cessation intervention using an intervention mapping provided in the
primary care setting is increasingly responding to the complexities of health
determinants. The SEM offers the framework to describe human behavior's
difficulties on multiple levels of intervention to promote health. Furthermore,
the SEM and the TTM help the healthcare provider, particularly nurses,
understand real-world complexities, offer smoking cessation services, and
co-operate with the related organizations suitably. This study indicated that an
integrated smoking cessation intervention in the primary care system raised
smokers' motivation to stop and improved their chances of quitting successfully.
This finding was consistent with previous studies [30, 31]. Smokers who were
offered the smoking cessation service by CHWs who understood the background
information and were given intensive counselling by TNQ counsellors with special
expertise in smoking cessation may have a higher chance of quitting
successfully.

With all reasons taken into account, professional nurses working in tobacco
control and researchers must collaborate to advance the field by expanding their
understanding of the SEM. The Integrated smoking cessation service model
increased the quit rate among Thai smokers. Consequently, the stage-matched
intervention is beneficial for Thailand.


CONCLUSION

An intervention mapping can be used as a guideline to develop smoking cessation
in the primary care setting. Nurses should play a significant role in
supervising CHWs in primary care smoking cessation services in order to urge
community smokers to quit smoking completely. This study provides the smoking
cessation protocol delivered for Thai smokers, particularly in the primary care
service system, to promote sustainable well-being among Thais.


LIMITATIONS

The CHWs might face some obstacles while visiting the smokers’ homes due to the
COVID-19 pandemic.


LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

WHOFCTC = World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control KASC
= Knowledge Associated with Smoking Cessation


ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The Ethics Sub-Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects, Nakhon Pathom
Rajabhat University (ECNP) (COA No. 016/2021), approved the research project.


HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No animals were used for studies that are the basis of this research. All the
humans used were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.


CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Before conducting the study intervention, the study protocol, information, and
informed consent form were considered ethical to assure confidentiality and
anonymity.


STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE guidelines were followed.


AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data supporting the finding of this study are available within the article.


FUNDING

This study was financially supported by a Graduate School Thesis Grant,
Chulalongkorn University, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University, and Tobacco Control
Research and Knowledge Management Center.


CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts oct of interest, financial or otherwise.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to express sincere gratitude to the participants in the
study for participating in this project and Graduate School, Chulalongkorn
University, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University, and Tobacco Control Research and
Knowledge Management Center for offering a secure foundation, support, and
encouragement.


REFERENCES

1
Benjakul S, Kengkarnpanit M, Kengkarnpanit T, Sujirarat D. Forecasting diseases
& health hazard report: trend of tobacco consumption among Thai population.
Bangkok: Nice earth design 2014.
 * a [...] issues, with Thailand being no exception [
 * b [...] have not used tobacco cessation services [

2
Eisenberg SL, Eisenberg MJ. Smoking cessation during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 22(9): 1664-5.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
3
WHO Guidelines for implementation of Article 14 of the WHO Framework Convention
on Tobacco Control. World Health Organization. 2010. Available from:
http://www.who.int/fctc/guide lines/adopted/article_14/en/
Go to reference
4
The Second National Strategic Plan for Tobacco Control. 2015. Available from:
http://btc.ddc.moph.go.th/th/upload/datacenter/59- 04-26-GYTS-Strategy(1).pdf
Go to reference
5
Percival J. Smoking cessation: the role of the community nurse. Prim Health Care
2000; 10(3): 43-9.
Go to reference
CrossRef
6
Youdan B, Queally B. Nurses’ role in promoting and supporting smoking cessation.
Nurs Times 2005; 101(10): 26-7.
Go to reference
PubMed
7
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health
promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988; 15(4): 351-77.
CrossRef
PubMed
 * a [...] The socio-ecological model [
 * b [...] model (SEM) proposed by McLeroy Bibeau [
 * c [...] We used the SEM [
 * d [...] SEM is a social and environmental theory [

8
Gamel C, Grypdonck M, Hengeveld M, Davis B. A method to develop a nursing
intervention: the contribution of qualitative studies to the process. J Adv Nurs
2001; 33(6): 806-19.
CrossRef
PubMed
 * a [...] the intervention development guidelines [
 * b [...] as well as the Intervention Mapping [

9
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.
Am J Health Promot 1997; 12(1): 38-48.
CrossRef
PubMed
 * a [...] the transtheoretical model (TTM) [
 * b [...] ] and the TTM [
 * c [...] The TTM [
 * d [...] is essential for beginning phase movement [
 * e [...] Finally, the TTM [

10
Eldredge LKB, Markham CM, Ruiter RA, Fernández ME, Kok G, Parcel GS. Planning
health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach 2016.
Go to reference
11
Julian PTH. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2011.
 * a [...] by The Cochrane Collaboration tool [
 * b [...] Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England) [

12
Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center. Evaluating for
Promotion Campaign Project 2018.http://www.trc.or. th/th/
 * a [...] to quit smoking after six months overall [
 * b [...] ], 2) 1% for Quit for King project [

13
Wungmun R, Sroyraya N, Meekaew L, Hungkhuntod C. Study of the effectiveness of
Motivational interviewing on smoking behavior changing among clients in the
smoking cessation clinic at Sumrongtab Hospital, Sumrongtab District, Surin
Province 2014.
Go to reference
14
Pimsak T, Chaikoolvatana A, Pheunpha P. Quit smoking behavior of current
smokers: A case study at pharsai clinic, Ubon ratchathani university.
Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30(3): 282-91.
Go to reference
15
Thailand National Quitline. The Thailand national quitline annual report 2016
Bangkok: The Thailand national quitline 2017.
 * a [...] 37% for Thailand National Quitline (TNQ) [
 * b [...] healthcare setting. Additionally, the TNQ [

16
Thanomsat K, Yunibhand J. Effective behavioral interventions for smoking
cessation in the primary care setting: A meta-analysis. Interdisciplinary Res
2019; 14(6): 1-6.
Go to reference
17
Cahill K, Lancaster T, Green N. Stage-based interventions for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (11): CD004492.
PubMed
 * a [...] for receiving the intensive staged-based [
 * b [...] for receiving the intensive staged-based [
 * c [...] technique to change unexpected behaviors [

18
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking:
Toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51(3):
390-5.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
19
National Statistical Office. The smoking and drinking behaviour survey 2017
2018.
Go to reference
20
Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Rickert W, Robinson J. Measuring the
Heaviness of Smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day
and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Addiction 1989; 84(7): 791-800.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
21
Etter JF, Sutton S. Assessing ‘stage of change’ in current and former smokers.
Addiction 2002; 97(9): 1171-82.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
22
Fagan P, Augustson E, Backinger CL, et al. Quit attempts and intention to quit
cigarette smoking among young adults in the United States. Am J Public Health
2007; 97(8): 1412-20.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
23
Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research
2017.
 * a [...] using Cronbach’s alpha was 0.80 [
 * b [...] CVI/average proportion (S-CVI/Ave) [
 * c [...] using Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88 [
 * d [...] CVI/average proportion (S-CVI/Ave) [

24
Connelly BS, Sackett PR, Waters SD. Balancing treatment and control groups in
quasi-experiments: An introduction to propensity scoring. Person Psychol 2013;
66(2): 407-42.
Go to reference
CrossRef
25
Jackson SE, Kotz D, West R, Brown J. Moderators of real‐world effectiveness of
smoking cessation aids: a population study. Addiction 2019; 114(9): 1627-38.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
26
Alton D, Eng L, Lu L, et al. Perceptions of continued smoking and smoking
cessation among patients with cancer. J Oncol Pract 2018; 14(5): e269-79.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
27
Cano M, Pennington D, Reyes S, et al. Factors associated with smoking in
low-income persons with and without chronic illness. Tob Induc Dis 2021;
19(July): 1-11.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
28
Leem AY, Han CH, Ahn CM, et al. Factors associated with stage of change in
smoker in relation to smoking cessation based on the Korean National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey II-V. PLoS One 2017; 12(5): e0176294.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
29
El-Khoury Lesueur F, Bolze C, Melchior M. Factors associated with successful vs.
unsuccessful smoking cessation: Data from a nationally representative study.
Addict Behav 2018; 80: 110-5.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
30
Ngo CQ, Phan PT, Vu GV, et al. Impact of a smoking cessation quitline in
Vietnam: evidence base and future directions. Int J Environ Res Public Health
2019; 16(14): 2538.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
31
Scheffers-van Schayck T, Otten R, Engels RCME, Kleinjan M. Proactive telephone
smoking cessation counseling tailored to parents: Results of a randomized
controlled effectiveness trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16(15):
2730.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
Submit Manuscript


ADVERTISEMENT




back to top



FOLLOW US


 * About Us
 * About the Journal
 * About the Publisher
 * Editorial Board
 * FAQs
   
 * Open Access Policy
 * Open Url Guidelines

 * For Authors
 * Archiving Policies
 * Article Processing Charges
 * Author Benefits
 * Authorship
 * Bentham Manuscript Processing System
 * Institutional Membership
 * Instructions for Authors
 * Manuscript Transfer Facility
 * Special Fee Waivers and Discounts

 * FOR EDITORS & REVIEWERS
 * Editorial Management
 * Editorial Policies
 * Ensuring Content Integrity
 * Ethical Guidelines for New Editors
 * Guest Editor Guidelines
 * Peer Review Workflow
 * Publication Process
 * Guidelines for Peer Reviewers

 * ETHICAL GUIDELINES
 * Allegations from Whistleblowers
 * Conflict of Interest
 * Fabricating and Stating False Information
 * Plagiarism Prevention
 * Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
 * Publishing Ethics
 * Research Misconduct

 * JOIN OUR TEAM
 * Join as an Editorial Board Member
 * Join as an Executive Guest Editor
 * Join as a Reviewer
 * Join as a Section Editor (Special Issues)
 * MARKETING OPPORTUNITIES
 * Advertising Policy
 * Kudos
 * Promotional Services


 * Terms and Conditions
 * Privacy Policy
 * Contact Us






1800
1801
1802
1803
1804

 close


Click to get updates and verify authenticity.




AUTHORS & INFORMATION

AuthorsInformation


AUTHORS

AFFILIATIONSEXPAND ALL

Kamollabhu Thanomsat 1
Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Borommaratchonani Srisataphan
Building, 11th Floor, Rama 1 Road, Wang Mai Subdistrict, Pathum Wan District,
Bangkok, Thailand

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jintana Yunibhand 1, *
Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Borommaratchonani Srisataphan
Building, 11th Floor, Rama 1 Road, Wang Mai Subdistrict, Pathum Wan District,
Bangkok, Thailand

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunida Preechawong 1
Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Borommaratchonani Srisataphan
Building, 11th Floor, Rama 1 Road, Wang Mai Subdistrict, Pathum Wan District,
Bangkok, Thailand

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


INFORMATION

PUBLISHED IN

The Open Public Health Journal
RESEARCH ARTICLE

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Year: 2022
Volume: 15
E-location ID: e187494452207280
DOI: 10.2174/18749445-v15-e2207280

CITE AS

Thanomsat K, Yunibhand J, Preechawong S. An Integrated Smoking Cessation
Intervention in the Primary Care Service System: An Intervention Mapping. Open
Public Health J, 2022; 15: e187494452207280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/18749445-v15-e2207280

ARTICLE HISTORY

Received Date: 21 Sep 2021
Revision Received Date: 10 Jan 2022
Electronic Publication Date: 28 Sep 2022

COPYRIGHT


© 2022 Thanomsat et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY
4.0), a copy of which is available at:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to express sincere gratitude to the participants in the
study for participating in this project and Graduate School, Chulalongkorn
University, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University, and Tobacco Control Research and
Knowledge Management Center for offering a secure foundation, support, and
encouragement.


DOWNLOAD


DOWNLOAD1

DOWNLOAD

Abstract PDF ePub


CITATIONS & METRICS

CitationsMetrics


CITATIONS

CITE AS

Thanomsat K, Yunibhand J, Preechawong S. An Integrated Smoking Cessation
Intervention in the Primary Care Service System: An Intervention Mapping. Open
Public Health J, 2022; 15: e187494452207280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/18749445-v15-e2207280

EXPORT CITATION

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Please select one from the list RIS EndNote BibTex

Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


METRICS

ARTICLE USAGE (LAST 30 DAYS)

Article Metrics

ARTICLE USAGE (DEMOGRAPHIC)


Article MetricsUnited
StatesThailandFranceJapanMoldovaCanadaGermanyChinaIndia1/523.5%13.1%12.4%2.1%10.9%

CountryViewsUnited
States760Thailand426France402Japan352Moldova150Canada123Germany121China99India99United
Kingdom89Russian Federation57South
Africa56Australia47Malaysia39Belgium39Netherlands29Hong
Kong28Indonesia24Seychelles20Singapore18Kenya15Sweden15Ireland14Israel13Czech
Republic12Botswana9Philippines8Pakistan8Nigeria8Spain8Latvia7Ethiopia7Romania7Ukraine7Saudi
Arabia7Bulgaria6Iran6New Zealand6Cameroon6Finland6Trinidad and
Tobago5Argentina5Greece5Korea5Ghana4Europe4Brazil4Kazakhstan4Turkey3Switzerland3Gibraltar3Vietnam3Iraq3Albania2Egypt2Mongolia2Greenland2Taiwan2Morocco2Poland2Barbados2Marshall
Islands2Algeria2Lithuania2Libya1Dominican
Republic1Guatemala1Denmark1Zimbabwe1Bosnia and
Herzegovina1Qatar1Luxembourg1Namibia1Armenia1Nepal1United Arab
Emirates1Bangladesh1Azerbaijan1

0/0



COPYRIGHT & LICENSE


COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE

© 2022 THANOMSAT .ET AL

Open-Access License: This is an open access article distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY
4.0), a copy of which is available at:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.

Address correspondence to this author at the Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn
University, Borommaratchonani Srisataphan Building, 11th Floor, Rama 1 Road,
Wang Mai Subdistrict, Pathum Wan District, Bangkok, Thailand; E-mail:
yuni_jintana@hotmail.com


REFERENCES


REFERENCES

1
Benjakul S, Kengkarnpanit M, Kengkarnpanit T, Sujirarat D. Forecasting diseases
& health hazard report: trend of tobacco consumption among Thai population.
Bangkok: Nice earth design 2014.
 * a [...] issues, with Thailand being no exception [
 * b [...] have not used tobacco cessation services [

2
Eisenberg SL, Eisenberg MJ. Smoking cessation during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 22(9): 1664-5.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
3
WHO Guidelines for implementation of Article 14 of the WHO Framework Convention
on Tobacco Control. World Health Organization. 2010. Available from:
http://www.who.int/fctc/guide lines/adopted/article_14/en/
Go to reference
4
The Second National Strategic Plan for Tobacco Control. 2015. Available from:
http://btc.ddc.moph.go.th/th/upload/datacenter/59- 04-26-GYTS-Strategy(1).pdf
Go to reference
5
Percival J. Smoking cessation: the role of the community nurse. Prim Health Care
2000; 10(3): 43-9.
Go to reference
CrossRef
6
Youdan B, Queally B. Nurses’ role in promoting and supporting smoking cessation.
Nurs Times 2005; 101(10): 26-7.
Go to reference
PubMed
7
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health
promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988; 15(4): 351-77.
CrossRef
PubMed
 * a [...] The socio-ecological model [
 * b [...] model (SEM) proposed by McLeroy Bibeau [
 * c [...] We used the SEM [
 * d [...] SEM is a social and environmental theory [

8
Gamel C, Grypdonck M, Hengeveld M, Davis B. A method to develop a nursing
intervention: the contribution of qualitative studies to the process. J Adv Nurs
2001; 33(6): 806-19.
CrossRef
PubMed
 * a [...] the intervention development guidelines [
 * b [...] as well as the Intervention Mapping [

9
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.
Am J Health Promot 1997; 12(1): 38-48.
CrossRef
PubMed
 * a [...] the transtheoretical model (TTM) [
 * b [...] ] and the TTM [
 * c [...] The TTM [
 * d [...] is essential for beginning phase movement [
 * e [...] Finally, the TTM [

10
Eldredge LKB, Markham CM, Ruiter RA, Fernández ME, Kok G, Parcel GS. Planning
health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach 2016.
Go to reference
11
Julian PTH. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2011.
 * a [...] by The Cochrane Collaboration tool [
 * b [...] Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England) [

12
Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center. Evaluating for
Promotion Campaign Project 2018.http://www.trc.or. th/th/
 * a [...] to quit smoking after six months overall [
 * b [...] ], 2) 1% for Quit for King project [

13
Wungmun R, Sroyraya N, Meekaew L, Hungkhuntod C. Study of the effectiveness of
Motivational interviewing on smoking behavior changing among clients in the
smoking cessation clinic at Sumrongtab Hospital, Sumrongtab District, Surin
Province 2014.
Go to reference
14
Pimsak T, Chaikoolvatana A, Pheunpha P. Quit smoking behavior of current
smokers: A case study at pharsai clinic, Ubon ratchathani university.
Srinagarind Med J 2015; 30(3): 282-91.
Go to reference
15
Thailand National Quitline. The Thailand national quitline annual report 2016
Bangkok: The Thailand national quitline 2017.
 * a [...] 37% for Thailand National Quitline (TNQ) [
 * b [...] healthcare setting. Additionally, the TNQ [

16
Thanomsat K, Yunibhand J. Effective behavioral interventions for smoking
cessation in the primary care setting: A meta-analysis. Interdisciplinary Res
2019; 14(6): 1-6.
Go to reference
17
Cahill K, Lancaster T, Green N. Stage-based interventions for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (11): CD004492.
PubMed
 * a [...] for receiving the intensive staged-based [
 * b [...] for receiving the intensive staged-based [
 * c [...] technique to change unexpected behaviors [

18
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking:
Toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51(3):
390-5.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
19
National Statistical Office. The smoking and drinking behaviour survey 2017
2018.
Go to reference
20
Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Rickert W, Robinson J. Measuring the
Heaviness of Smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day
and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Addiction 1989; 84(7): 791-800.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
21
Etter JF, Sutton S. Assessing ‘stage of change’ in current and former smokers.
Addiction 2002; 97(9): 1171-82.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
22
Fagan P, Augustson E, Backinger CL, et al. Quit attempts and intention to quit
cigarette smoking among young adults in the United States. Am J Public Health
2007; 97(8): 1412-20.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
23
Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research
2017.
 * a [...] using Cronbach’s alpha was 0.80 [
 * b [...] CVI/average proportion (S-CVI/Ave) [
 * c [...] using Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88 [
 * d [...] CVI/average proportion (S-CVI/Ave) [

24
Connelly BS, Sackett PR, Waters SD. Balancing treatment and control groups in
quasi-experiments: An introduction to propensity scoring. Person Psychol 2013;
66(2): 407-42.
Go to reference
CrossRef
25
Jackson SE, Kotz D, West R, Brown J. Moderators of real‐world effectiveness of
smoking cessation aids: a population study. Addiction 2019; 114(9): 1627-38.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
26
Alton D, Eng L, Lu L, et al. Perceptions of continued smoking and smoking
cessation among patients with cancer. J Oncol Pract 2018; 14(5): e269-79.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
27
Cano M, Pennington D, Reyes S, et al. Factors associated with smoking in
low-income persons with and without chronic illness. Tob Induc Dis 2021;
19(July): 1-11.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
28
Leem AY, Han CH, Ahn CM, et al. Factors associated with stage of change in
smoker in relation to smoking cessation based on the Korean National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey II-V. PLoS One 2017; 12(5): e0176294.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
29
El-Khoury Lesueur F, Bolze C, Melchior M. Factors associated with successful vs.
unsuccessful smoking cessation: Data from a nationally representative study.
Addict Behav 2018; 80: 110-5.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
30
Ngo CQ, Phan PT, Vu GV, et al. Impact of a smoking cessation quitline in
Vietnam: evidence base and future directions. Int J Environ Res Public Health
2019; 16(14): 2538.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed
31
Scheffers-van Schayck T, Otten R, Engels RCME, Kleinjan M. Proactive telephone
smoking cessation counseling tailored to parents: Results of a randomized
controlled effectiveness trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16(15):
2730.
Go to reference
CrossRef
PubMed


MEDIA

Figures


FIGURES

Fig. (1). The socio-ecological model [7].
Go to FigureOpen in Viewer
Fig. (2). The study protocol.
Go to FigureOpen in Viewer





TABLES

Application of an ecological model framework to develop an integrated smoking
cessation model in a primary health care system.
Go to TableOpen in Viewer


SHARE


SHARE

SHARE ARTICLE LINK

https://openpublichealthjournal.com/VOLUME/15/ELOCATOR/e187494452207280/FULLTEXT/

Copy Link

Copied!

Copying failed.

SHARE ON SOCIAL MEDIA




 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

 * figures
 * tables

Fig. (1).
Fig. (1). The socio-ecological model [7].
Fig. (2).
Fig. (2). The study protocol.
Application of an ecological model framework to develop an integrated smoking
cessation model in a primary health care system.
Home Volume 15 e187494452207280
Back to Volume 15
SHARE
Share on





PREVIOUS ARTICLE

|


Next

NEXT ARTICLE

Reference #1