reason.com Open in urlscan Pro
75.2.24.81  Public Scan

URL: https://reason.com/2024/01/30/a-new-pain-medication-could-reinforce-the-disastrous-crackdown-on-prescription-opioids/
Submission: On February 13 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 3 forms found in the DOM

GET https://reason.com/

<form role="search" method="get" class="search-form" action="https://reason.com/">
  <label>
    <span class="screen-reader-text">Search for:</span>
    <input type="search" class="search-field" placeholder="Search …" value="" name="s">
  </label>
  <input type="submit" class="search-submit" value="Search">
</form>

POST

<form method="post" id="gform_0" class="recaptcha-v3-initialized"><input type="hidden" name="login_redirect" value="/2024/01/30/a-new-pain-medication-could-reinforce-the-disastrous-crackdown-on-prescription-opioids/">
  <div class="gform_heading">
    <h3 class="gform_title">Login Form</h3>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_body">
    <div id="gform_fields_login" class="gform_fields top_label">
      <div id="field_0_1" class="gfield gfield--type-text gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_1"><label class="gfield_label gform-field-label"
          for="input_1">Username<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_text"><input name="input_1" id="input_1" type="text" value="" class="" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false"> </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_0_2" class="gfield gfield--type-text gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_2"><label class="gfield_label gform-field-label"
          for="input_2">Password<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_text"><input name="input_2" id="input_2" type="password" value="" class="" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false"> </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_0_3" class="gfield gfield--type-remember_me field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below hidden_label gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_3"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label screen-reader-text gfield_label_before_complex"></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_checkbox">
          <div class="gfield_checkbox" id="input_3">
            <div class="gchoice gchoice_3">
              <input class="gfield-choice-input" name="input_3.1" type="checkbox" value="1" id="choice_3">
              <label for="choice_3" id="label_3">Remember Me</label>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_footer top_label"> <button type="submit" id="gform_submit_button_0" class="gform_button button"
      onclick="if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]){return false;}  if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]=true;}  "
      onkeypress="if( event.keyCode == 13 ){ if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]){return false;} if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]=true;}  jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;).trigger(&quot;submit&quot;,[true]); }">Login</button>
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="is_submit_0" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_submit" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_unique_id" value="">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="state_0" value="WyJbXSIsIjVmZDk0MDRiMTc0NTYwODJmYTIwNGZlZDYxN2ViYzJjIl0=">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_target_page_number_0" id="gform_target_page_number_0" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_source_page_number_0" id="gform_source_page_number_0" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_field_values" value="">
  </div>
</form>

POST /2024/01/30/a-new-pain-medication-could-reinforce-the-disastrous-crackdown-on-prescription-opioids/#gf_17

<form method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" target="gform_ajax_frame_17" id="gform_17" class="puprf-signup-widget recaptcha-v3-initialized"
  action="/2024/01/30/a-new-pain-medication-could-reinforce-the-disastrous-crackdown-on-prescription-opioids/#gf_17" data-formid="17" novalidate="">
  <div class="gf_invisible ginput_recaptchav3" data-sitekey="6LeMnkUaAAAAALL8T1-XAyB7vxpOeTExu6KwR48-" data-tabindex="0"><input id="input_9ae663dc72ef42b46f2cf3a53ec042e1" class="gfield_recaptcha_response" type="hidden"
      name="input_9ae663dc72ef42b46f2cf3a53ec042e1" value=""></div>
  <div class="gform-body gform_body">
    <div id="gform_fields_17" class="gform_fields top_label form_sublabel_below description_below">
      <div id="field_17_1" class="gfield gfield--type-email gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below hidden_label gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_17_1"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label" for="input_17_1">Email<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_email">
          <input name="input_1" id="input_17_1" type="email" value="" class="large" placeholder="Email Address" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false">
        </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_17_2" class="gfield gfield--type-honeypot gform_validation_container field_sublabel_below gfield--has-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_17_2"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label" for="input_17_2">Name</label>
        <div class="ginput_container"><input name="input_2" id="input_17_2" type="text" value="" autocomplete="new-password"></div>
        <div class="gfield_description" id="gfield_description_17_2">This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.</div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_footer top_label"> <button type="submit" id="gform_submit_button_17" class="gform_button button"
      onclick="if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]){return false;}  if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]=true;}  "
      onkeypress="if( event.keyCode == 13 ){ if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]){return false;} if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]=true;}  jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;).trigger(&quot;submit&quot;,[true]); }">Submit</button>
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_ajax" value="form_id=17&amp;title=&amp;description=1&amp;tabindex=0&amp;theme=data-form-theme='gravity-theme'">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="is_submit_17" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_submit" value="17">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_unique_id" value="">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="state_17" value="WyJbXSIsIjVmZDk0MDRiMTc0NTYwODJmYTIwNGZlZDYxN2ViYzJjIl0=">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_target_page_number_17" id="gform_target_page_number_17" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_source_page_number_17" id="gform_source_page_number_17" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_field_values" value="">
  </div>
  <p style="display: none !important;" class="akismet-fields-container" data-prefix="ak_"><label>Δ<textarea name="ak_hp_textarea" cols="45" rows="8" maxlength="100"></textarea></label><input type="hidden" id="ak_js_1" name="ak_js"
      value="1707851051054">
    <script>
      document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value", (new Date()).getTime());
    </script>
  </p>
</form>

Text Content

 * Latest
 * Magazine
   * Current Issue
   * Archives
   * Subscribe
   * Crossword
 * Video
 * Podcasts
   * All Shows
   * The Reason Roundtable
   * The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
   * The Soho Forum Debates
   * Just Asking Questions
   * The Best of Reason Magazine
   * Why We Can't Have Nice Things
 * Volokh
 * Newsletters
 * Donate
   * Donate Online
   * Donate Crypto
   * Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
   * Torchbearer Society
   * Planned Giving
 * Subscribe
   * Print/Digital Subscriptions
   * Gift Subscriptions

Search for:


LOGIN FORM

Username(Required)

Password(Required)

Remember Me
Login
Create new account
Forgot password


Pain treatment


A NEW PAIN MEDICATION COULD REINFORCE THE DISASTROUS CRACKDOWN ON PRESCRIPTION
OPIOIDS


WHEN THE GOVERNMENT IS SYSTEMATICALLY INTERFERING WITH MEDICAL DECISIONS, A
NON-OPIOID ALTERNATIVE MAY NOT ACTUALLY INCREASE TREATMENT OPTIONS.

Jacob Sullum | 1.30.2024 4:25 PM

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly
versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
(K-State/Flickr)

Vertex Pharmaceuticals is trumpeting the results of clinical trials indicating
that VX-548, its new, non-opioid analgesic, is effective at relieving
post-surgical pain. While there is nothing wrong with offering patients and
doctors another option for treating acute pain, the Phase 3 trials found that
VX-548 was no more effective than a combination of hydrocodone and acetaminophen
in relieving pain after tummy tucks and less effective for patients who had
bunions removed.

As a new drug under patent, VX-548 is bound to be much more expensive than
generic versions of Vicodin, and its main selling point seems to be based on a
gross exaggeration of that familiar drug's addictive potential. The introduction
of VX-548 therefore could reinforce myths about the risks of prescription
opioids and encourage the government's misguided and heavy-handed crackdown on
those medications.

"People who are suffering from severe pain but don't want to risk addiction to
an opioid are closer to a new option for treatment," The Wall Street Journal
reports. The Journal claims "opioids are highly addictive," which is not true by
any reasonable measure.

Powered By

00:00/02:29
10 Sec


Some Trump Lawyers Are in 'Over Their Heads:' Bharara




Next
Stay





A 2018 BMJ study of 568,612 patients who took prescription opioids following
surgery found that 5,906, or 1 percent, showed documented signs of "opioid
misuse" during the course of the study, which included data from 2008 through
2016. The outcome measure that the researchers used, "opioid dependence, abuse,
or overdose," is a broad category that includes patterns of use falling short of
what most people would recognize as addiction. That suggests the actual
addiction rate in this study probably was less than 1 percent, although it's not
clear how much less. The authors noted that "overall rates of misuse were low."

Estimates of addiction rates among patients who take opioids for longer periods
of time tend to be higher but still lower than the phrase "highly addictive"
suggests. A 2010 analysis in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews found
that less than 1 percent of patients taking opioids for chronic pain experienced
addiction. A 2012 review in the journal Addiction likewise concluded that
"opioid analgesics for chronic pain conditions are not associated with a major
risk for developing dependence."

In a 2016 New England Journal of Medicine article, Nora Volkow, director of the
National Institute on Drug Abuse, and A. Thomas McLellan, a former deputy
director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, reported that "rates of
carefully diagnosed addiction" in chronic pain patients averaged less than 8
percent. In general, they observed, "addiction occurs in only a small percentage
of persons who are exposed to opioids—even among those with preexisting
vulnerabilities." In 2021, a California judge who examined the relevant evidence
likewise estimated that the addiction rate among patients was "less than 5%."

Even a low risk is still a risk, of course, and doctors might prefer to avoid it
by prescribing a drug like VX-548. But they should not pretend there are no
tradeoffs in terms of cost and effectiveness. The problem is that the government
has systematically biased such decisions by discouraging doctors from
prescribing opioids in the name of preventing substance abuse.



In response to an increase in opioid-related deaths during the first decade of
this century, state and federal officials sought to reduce the prescription of
analgesics like hydrocodone and oxycodone. Those efforts included increased
scrutiny of doctors' prescribing practices, raids of clinics identified (rightly
or wrongly) as "pill mills," federal pain treatment guidelines, statutory and
regulatory limits, and restrictive policies imposed by insurers, pharmacists,
and medical facilities under government pressure.

That campaign succeeded in reducing opioid prescriptions, which fell by 44
percent from 2011 to 2020. But it left many patients to suffer needlessly as
doctors became increasingly reluctant to prescribe the medication they needed to
relieve their pain, and it did not succeed in reducing the number of
opioid-related deaths.

To the contrary, the upward trend that prompted the anti-opioid campaign not
only continued but accelerated. The opioid-related death rate, which doubled
between 2001 and 2010, nearly tripled between 2011 and 2020. In 2021, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention counted more than 80,000
opioid-related deaths, nearly four times the number in 2010.

What went wrong? Restrictions on opioid prescribing pushed nonmedical users
toward black-market substitutes that were much more dangerous because their
composition was highly variable and unpredictable. That hazard was compounded by
the rise of illicit fentanyl, which likewise was driven by efforts to enforce
drug prohibition. Fentanyl, which is 30 to 50 times more potent than heroin,
appeals to drug traffickers because it is much cheaper to produce and much
easier to conceal. Nowadays it is showing up not just in powder sold as heroin
but also in ersatz pain pills that resemble the medications that the government
has made harder to obtain, with predictably deadly consequences.

Bona fide pain patients, meanwhile, were left in the lurch as physicians began
to see them as a threat to their licenses, livelihoods, and liberty. The
horrifying fallout included undertreatment, abrupt dose reductions, patient
abandonment, and unrelieved pain severe enough to result in suicides. This is
what happens when the government insists that doctors prioritize prevention of
opioid abuse above patient welfare and their own medical judgments. Patients
paid the price of policies that manifestly failed to reduce opioid-related
deaths and instead had the opposite effect.



The availability of non-opioid analgesics like VX-548 should expand pain
treatment choices. But in the current political context, it is apt to limit
choices instead, reinforcing propaganda and policies that discourage the use of
opioids even when they are medically appropriate.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and
trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

Email(Required)

Name

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Submit

Δ

NEXT: Alabama Killed an Inmate With an Experimental Execution Method. Ohio Could
Be Next.

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason.

Pain treatmentOpioidsPharmaceuticalsMedicineAddictionDrug PolicyWar on
DrugsBlack MarketsFentanylHeroinRegulation
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly
versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (45)


LATEST

BUFFALO COPS DENIED QUALIFIED IMMUNITY FOR ARRESTING MAN WHO CALLED OFFICER AN
'ASSHOLE'

Emma Camp | 2.13.2024 12:13 PM

JON STEWART'S RETURN TO THE DAILY SHOW WAS ACTUALLY PRETTY GREAT

Eric Boehm | 2.13.2024 11:45 AM

NEW YORK, NEW YORK

Christian Britschgi | 2.13.2024 10:15 AM

TUCKER DREAMS OF MOSCOW

Liz Wolfe | 2.13.2024 9:30 AM

MICHIGAN IS SPENDING MILLIONS TRYING TO REFURBISH A SKI-FLYING HILL. IT'S NOT
WORKING.

Natalie Dowzicky | From the March 2024 issue





 * About
 * Browse Topics
 * Events
 * Staff
 * Jobs
 * Donate
 * Advertise
 * Subscribe
 * Contact
 * Media
 * Shop
 * Amazon

Reason FacebookReason TwitterReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeReason
ItunesReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of
Service apply.



Notifications