www.washingtonpost.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
23.0.21.149
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/11/19/trump-hush-money-case-new-york/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&
Submission: On November 21 via api from CA — Scanned from CA
Submission: On November 21 via api from CA — Scanned from CA
Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM
<form class="wpds-c-gRPFSl wpds-c-gRPFSl-jGNYrR-isSlim-false">
<div class="transition-all duration-200 ease-in-out"><button type="submit" data-qa="sc-newsletter-signup-button" class="wpds-c-kSOqLF wpds-c-kSOqLF-uTUwn-variant-primary wpds-c-kSOqLF-eHdizY-density-default wpds-c-kSOqLF-ejCoEP-icon-left">Sign
up</button></div>
</form>Text Content
Accessibility statementSkip to main content Democracy Dies in Darkness SubscribeSign in Advertisement Democracy Dies in Darkness Trump hush money trialGuilty verdictWhat's nextTrump reactionThe evidenceTrial transcripts Trump hush money trialGuilty verdictWhat's nextTrump reactionThe evidenceTrial transcripts The Trump Cases N.Y. PROSECUTORS APPEAR OPEN TO YEARS-LONG DELAY IN TRUMP HUSH MONEY CASE Manhattan prosecutors said they will oppose a request by Donald Trump’s lawyers to dismiss his 34-count felony conviction as sought by the president-elect’s lawyers 7 min 1359 Justice Juan Merchan poses in his chambers in New York in March. (Seth Wenig/AP) By Shayna Jacobs Updated November 19, 2024 at 6:18 p.m. EST|Published November 19, 2024 at 6:30 a.m. EST NEW YORK — Manhattan prosecutors Tuesday said they will oppose a request by Donald Trump’s lawyers to dismiss his 34-count felony conviction but suggested they were open to postponing proceedings in the case until after the president-elect’s second term in the White House. Get the latest election news and results In a letter submitted to the court, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office acknowledged the significant change in circumstances due to Trump’s election win Nov. 5. Trump, who will take office Jan. 20 and serve until early 2029, had been scheduled for sentencing next week and faced up to four years in prison. Prosecutors asked for a pause in proceedings until after Dec. 9, when they said they would like to file their reply to Trump’s upcoming motion to dismiss the case. The case, in which a jury this year found Trump guilty of falsifying business records to hide a hush money payment to an adult-film actress, should not be dismissed, they said. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement “The People deeply respect the Office of the President, are mindful of the demands and the obligations of the presidency, and acknowledge that Defendant’s inauguration will raise unprecedented legal questions,” the letter says. “We also deeply respect the fundamental role of the jury in our constitutional system.” 🏛️ Follow Politics Follow Prosecutors also said in their letter that no current law that establishes a president’s temporary immunity requires dismissing a posttrial criminal proceeding that began when the individual was not immune and is based on unofficial conduct. Existing law seeks a balance that preserves “independence of the Executive and the integrity of the criminal justice system,” they said. Trump spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement that Trump’s lawyers were seeking to have the case dismissed “once and for all.” Advertisement Story continues below advertisement Merchan had not announced a ruling on the filing as of Tuesday afternoon. Discussions on the future of the case were prompted by a Nov. 8 letter from Trump attorneys Todd Blanche and Emil Bove asking prosecutors to throw out the case, which they argued was legally mandated. “A sitting President is completely immune from indictment or any criminal process, state or federal, and the same immunity extends to a President-elect during his transition into the Presidency,” Blanche and Bove wrote, citing their client’s ongoing transition efforts. Tuesday’s response from prosecutors was expected to help determine whether Trump returns to the White House after his inauguration Jan. 20 as the only president convicted and sentenced in a crime. Trump was charged in four criminal cases after his first term in office, but only the New York prosecution went to trial before his election win, apparently leaving the others in jeopardy. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement A jury this year found Trump guilty in the hush money case, which was presided over by Merchan. Trump’s conviction in May for falsifying business documents involves $130,000 paid to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels in the weeks before the 2016 presidential election to keep her quiet about their alleged sexual encounter years earlier, which he denies. Bragg and his team could have asked Merchan to sentence Trump this month as planned or before he is sworn in. In that case, Merchan may have issued a fine, finding it most practical or in the interest of justice to spare Trump jail or prison time, or a possibly burdensome probation process. A fine probably would not have impeded Trump’s transition work or his future presidency, but critics could view such a punishment as insufficient. Bragg asked for a general postponement, also known as a stay, of future events in the proceedings. Prosecutors could have recommended that the verdict be thrown out and the indictment dismissed. Such a move would have run counter to the efforts of current and former prosecutors in the Manhattan district attorney’s office, and the decision by Bragg to move forward on the case. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement Vacating the verdict could be considered by many observers as disrespectful to the process and to the jury that served for six weeks at Trump’s trial to come to a decision. Criminal courts are also reluctant to disturb jury verdicts, and case law firmly protects them except in rare, extraordinary circumstances. It is a mechanism used sometimes in wrongful convictions or if evidence comes to light after a conviction that could reasonably have changed the outcome of a defendant’s case. “The weight of the successful election by President Trump has shifted sort of the balance of power in this dynamic at this moment in the case,” said Bragg’s predecessor Cyrus R. Vance Jr., whose office began investigating Trump’s business activities and the hush money matter during his first term. Story continues below advertisement “The truth of the matter is it’s hard to see an easy path forward that isn’t going to be very controversial,” Vance said. Advertisement Trump’s attorneys would be likely to argue that jail at any point for him would be problematic and unjust. A president and former commanders in chief are guarded by the Secret Service at all times with a security apparatus that screens locations to sweep buildings and surrounding areas for potential threats. New York City’s main jail complex has a long history of problematic security breaches. While it’s possible that arrangements could be made for Trump to serve time elsewhere, his team would argue that any jail or prison facility or home confinement would be unworkable and unsafe, especially in light of two apparent assassination attempts this year. Story continues below advertisement Columbia Law School professor Daniel Richman said the most plausible option may be to hold off on sentencing until Trump is out of office, in part because of the Supreme Court’s recent broad immunity decision regarding presidents. Advertisement “Probably the most reasonable ask here would be to put the case if possible in abeyance for four years,” Richman said. “I’m not sure there are other choices.” Merchan has held off on deciding on Trump’s motion to vacate the conviction and dismiss his indictment, eliminating the chance it could be retried, on the grounds that the district attorney built the case on evidence that is barred by the July 1 immunity ruling by the Supreme Court. Story continues below advertisement That ruling broadly defined official conduct by a president, and some of the documents and testimony used before the grand jury and at trial stemmed from 2017, Trump’s first year in office during his first term. Merchan would need to rule on that motion, which he was expected to do Nov. 12, to sentence Trump but he instead asked prosecutors to inform him by Tuesday how they wanted to proceed. Advertisement Trump has faced an avalanche of investigations and lawsuits in recent years, and the Manhattan district attorney’s probe into his business activities is one of the oldest among them, spanning two elected prosecutors’ administrations and involving a number of current and former district attorney staffers. The Trump Organization as an entity was also convicted by the office for tax fraud in 2022, a case indicted under former district attorney Vance but tried in court in 2022 after Bragg took office. Bragg’s team looked at a potential case related to a separate theory of business fraud but later turned its attention to the hush money matter. Story continues below advertisement Trump’s indictment in the false records case — made public on April 4, 2023 — was the first of four against him in state and federal courts. Special counsel Jack Smith filed charges against Trump in Florida for illegally hoarding classified documents at his Palm Beach residence and private club Mar-a-Lago after his term ended and interfering with government efforts to retrieve them. Advertisement A Trump-appointed judge threw out the case on a what legal experts and the Justice Department believed was a wildly improper basis. Smith’s office was in the process of appealing it and it was seen as likely to succeed before Trump’s recent election win. Trump also has open criminal proceedings in D.C., in another Smith case, for election obstruction related to his involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection and in state court in Georgia for election interference. He was indicted there along with a number of allies but that case faced extensive delays and is still pending. TRUMP NEW YORK HUSH MONEY CASE Donald Trump is the first former president convicted of a crime. The sentencing: Trump’s sentencing was pushed back to November, as his lawyers seek to convince the trial judge that his conviction should be tossed out after a Supreme Court ruling that presidents have immunity for official acts. He faces up to four years in prison, but legal experts say incarceration appears unlikely. Can Trump serve as president? Yes. He is eligible to campaign and serve as president if elected, but he won’t be able to pardon himself. Here’s everything to know about next steps and the other outstanding trials he faces. Reaction to the verdict: Trump continued to maintain his innocence, railing against what he called a “rigged, disgraceful trial” and emphasizing voters would deliver the real verdict on Election Day. The charges: Trump was found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. Falsifying business records is a felony in New York when there is an “intent to defraud” that includes an intent to “commit another crime or to aid or conceal” another crime. Show more Share 1359 Comments Trump New York hush money case HAND CURATED * N.Y. prosecutors appear open to years-long delay in Trump hush money case November 19, 2024 * No immunity decision in Trump’s hush money case as prosecutors weigh how to proceed November 12, 2024 * Donald Trump found guilty on all counts in New York hush money trial May 30, 2024 View 3 more storiesView 3 more stories NewsletterWeekdays Early Brief The Washington Post's essential guide to power and influence in D.C. Sign up Recommended for you Recommended by Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan → Advertisement Advertisement live updatespolitics9:50 AM SENATE DEMOCRATS REQUEST MATT GAETZ CASE FILES FROM THE FBI 9:25 AMLinda McMahon made a fortune with WWE. Wrestling scandals now shadow her rise. 8:56 AMTrump’s education pick once incorrectly claimed to have education degree 8:36 AMGOP senators say RFK Jr. must ‘explain’ vaccine criticism, other views 8:22 AMTrump’s lawyers want a month to file new hush money dismissal bid Advertisement Advertisement Company About The Post Newsroom Policies & Standards Diversity & Inclusion Careers Media & Community Relations WP Creative Group Accessibility Statement Sections Trending Politics Elections Opinions National World Style Sports Business Climate Well+Being D.C., Md., & Va. Obituaries Weather Arts & Entertainments Recipes Get The Post Manage Your Subscription Become a Subscriber Gift Subscriptions Mobile & Apps Newsletters & Alerts Washington Post Live Reprints & Permissions Post Store Books & E-Books Print Special Editions Store Print Archives (Subscribers Only) Today’s Paper Public Notices Contact Us Contact the Newsroom Contact Customer Care Contact the Opinions Team Advertise Licensing & Syndication Request a Correction Send a News Tip Report a Vulnerability Terms of Use Digital Products Terms of Sale Print Products Terms of Sale Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Settings Submissions & Discussion Policy RSS Terms of Service Sitemap Ad Choices washingtonpost.com © 1996-2024 The Washington Post COMPANY CHEVRON ICON Diversity & Inclusion Careers Media & Community Relations WP Creative Group Accessibility Statement SECTIONS CHEVRON ICON Trending Politics Elections Opinions National World Style Sports Business Climate Well+Being D.C., Md., & Va. Obituaries Weather Arts & Entertainments Recipes GET THE POST CHEVRON ICON Manage Your Subscription Become a Subscriber Gift Subscriptions Mobile & Apps Newsletters & Alerts Washington Post Live Reprints & Permissions Post Store Books & E-Books Print Special Editions Store Print Archives (Subscribers Only) Today’s Paper Public Notices CONTACT US CHEVRON ICON Contact the Newsroom Contact Customer Care Contact the Opinions Team Advertise Licensing & Syndication Request a Correction Send a News Tip Report a Vulnerability Download the Washington Post App * About The Post * Policies & Standards * Digital Products Terms of Sale * Print Products Terms of Sale * Terms of Service * Privacy Policy * Cookie Settings * Submissions & Discussion Policy * RSS Terms of Service * Sitemap * Ad Choices * washingtonpost.com * © 1996-2024 The Washington Post