siril.me
Open in
urlscan Pro
185.199.109.153
Public Scan
Submitted URL: http://siril.me/
Effective URL: https://siril.me/
Submission: On November 21 via api from IN — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://siril.me/
Submission: On November 21 via api from IN — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOMText Content
Toggle navigation * about (current) * publications * teaching * cv * misc Picxel - HTML Art GAMES - McGill U * ctrl k * SIRIL TEJA DUKKIPATI PhD candidate at MBR Lab, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. siril.dukkipati@mail.mcgill.ca sirilteja.dukkipati@gmail.com Welcome.! I am a PhD candidate at the Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Lab headed by Dr. Mark Driscoll in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at McGill. My work mainly focuses on the Biomechanics of Human Spine and it’s modeling. As the name suggests, my lab works in various fields ranging from FE Simulations to Benchtop model design to Virtual surgery planning - all revolving around the human spine, it’s stability and various medical conditions related to it. My research interests include Robot design, Control, Experimental validation. My PhD work is focused on developing a validated robotic benchtop spinal model for use as a research tool in low back research. I also do some web dev and delve in cybersecurity topics. I hold a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Manipal University, India and did my bachelor’s thesis with the R&MM Research Group at Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. I was also a part of Mars Society South Asia and worked on promoting space exploration and education in the 7 South Asian countries by organizing robotic competitions like IRC, IRDC etc. In my free time, I enjoy doing photography. I love cycling and go on long biking trips during summers. NEWS Sep 13, 2022 Another podium presentation on “Viscoelastic properties of 3D printed thoracolumbar fascia” at the Fascia Research Congress 2022, Montreal, Canada Jul 04, 2022 Gave a podium presentation titled “Design and validation of 3D printed analogous lumbar model for use in a robotic benchtop spine model at ESMC 2022, Galway, Ireland. Jun 02, 2022 Funding secured - Fonds de recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies FRQNT Masters research Scholarship 2022. SELECTED PUBLICATIONS 1. Preprint Evaluation of a High Fidelity Rigid Body Spine Model for Muscle Recruitment and Intra-Abdominal Pressure Simulations Siril Teja Dukkipati, and Mark Driscoll 2024 Abs Bib HTML A rigid body musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine along with intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was presented in this research. Traditional spinal biomechanical models in literature often neglect the load-sharing effect of IAP on the spine and can be computationally intensive. These limitations limit them to be effectively used for computationally intensive applications like muscle recruitment simulations. As such, there remains a need for high-fidelity validated musculoskeletal spine models, hence developed herein. The skeletal components were adapted from 3D MRI scans and the intervertebral discs were modeled as 3 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) gimbal joints with a custom joint torque feedback for their control. Supraspinous, interspinous, and intertransverse ligaments were modeled as tension-only springs. Further, two methods of modeling IAP were discussed and implemented. The resultant model consisted a total of 15 DOFs, constrained by 279 independent force-generating elements. The lumbar segmental stiffness profiles in all three directions were found to be within one standard deviation of the literature data. A linear increase in the extensor torque about L3 was observed with an increase in IAP emphasizing the IAP’s load-sharing effect during flexion. The 6 sec compilation and 1.4 sec run times suggest that this model is suitable for muscle recruitment optimization problems. This MATLAB based simulation platform offers a quick and intuitive tool to visualize physiological loading for the biomechanics community. @article{3Manu2024, author = {Dukkipati, Siril Teja and Driscoll, Mark}, doi = {}, issn = {}, journal = {}, title = {Evaluation of a High Fidelity Rigid Body Spine Model for Muscle Recruitment and Intra-Abdominal Pressure Simulations}, url = {}, year = {2024}, dimensions = {true}, google_scholar_id = {}, } 2. J. Bionic Eng. Design Improvements and Validation of a Novel Fully 3D Printed Analogue Lumbar Spine Motion Segment Siril Teja Dukkipati, and Mark Driscoll Journal of Bionic Engineering, May 2024 Abs Bib HTML 1 1 Total citation 0 Recent citations n/a Field Citation Ratio n/a Relative Citation Ratio Spine biomechanical testing methods in the past few decades have not evolved beyond employing either cadaveric studies or finite element modeling techniques. However, both these approaches may have inherent cost and time limitations. Cadaveric studies are the present gold standard for spinal implant design and regulatory approval, but they introduce significant variability in measurements across patients, often requiring large sample sizes. Finite element modeling demands considerable expertise and can be computationally expensive when complex geometry and material nonlinearity are introduced. Validated analogue spine models could complement these traditional methods as a low-cost and high-fidelity alternative. A fully 3D printable L-S1 analogue spine model with ligaments is developed and validated in this research. Rotational stiffness of the model under pure bending loading in flexion-extension, Lateral Bending (LB) and Axial Rotation (AR) is evaluated and compared against historical ex vivo and in silico models. Additionally, the effect of interspinous, intertransverse ligaments and the Thoracolumbar Fascia (TLF) on spinal stiffness is evaluated by systematic construction of the model. In flexion, model Range of Motion (ROM) was 12.92 ± 0.11° (ex vivo: 16.58°, in silico: 12.96°) at 7.5Nm. In LB, average ROM was 13.67 ± 0.12° at 7.5 Nm (ex vivo: 15.21 ± 1.89°, in silico: 15.49 ± 0.23°). Similarly, in AR, average ROM was 17.69 ± 2.12° at 7.5Nm (ex vivo: 14.12 ± 0.31°, in silico: 15.91 ± 0.28°). The addition of interspinous and intertransverse ligaments increased both flexion and LB stiffnesses by approximately 5%. Addition of TLF showed increase in flexion and AR stiffnesses by 29% and 24%, respectively. This novel model can reproduce physiological ROMs with high repeatability and could be a useful open-source tool in spine biomechanics. @article{2Manu2024, author = {Dukkipati, Siril Teja and Driscoll, Mark}, doi = {10.1007/s42235-024-00512-8}, issn = {1672-6529}, issue = {3}, journal = {Journal of Bionic Engineering}, keywords = {Artificial Intelligence,Biochemical Engineering,Bioinformatics,Biomaterials,Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering,Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology}, month = may, pages = {1388-1396}, publisher = {Springer}, title = {Design Improvements and Validation of a Novel Fully 3D Printed Analogue Lumbar Spine Motion Segment}, volume = {21}, url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42235-024-00512-8}, year = {2024}, dimensions = {true}, google_scholar_id = {zYLM7Y9cAGgC}, } 3. Preprint Development and Biomechanical Evaluation of a 3D Printed Analogue Lumbar Spine Motion Segment Siril Teja Dukkipati, and Mark Driscoll SSRN Electronic Journal, May 2022 Abs Bib HTML 1 1 Total citation 1 Recent citation 0.65 Field Citation Ratio n/a Relative Citation Ratio There exists a need for validated lumbar spine models in spine biomechanics research. Although cadaveric testing is the current gold standard for spinal implant development, it poses significant issues related to reliability, repeatability, and ethics. Analogue or synthetic models can act as cost saving alternatives to human tissue. This study presents a first reproducible 3D printable L1-S1 lumbar spine motion segment and validated it in flexion-extension (F-E), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) in the range of 15° against in vitro data and in silico models. The model consisted of L1 to S1 vertebrae, corresponding intervertebral discs, intertransverse, interspinous, anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, and facet joints. Displacement controlled pure moments were applied in the range of 15° in all three bending modes and the resisting moment was recorded. Rotational stiffness was calculated by plotting the resisting moment against rotation. The model reached a maximum of 5.66Nm and 3.53Nm at 15° flexion and rotation, 3.84Nm and 3.93Nm at 15° right and left lateral bending, and 2.45Nm and 2.59Nm at 15° right and left axial rotations respectively. Scaling factors b=1.6 and g=3.0 were applied in LB and AR to calibrate the model response. Post scaling, the model response in all axes correlated well with in vitro and in silico literature data. An RMS error of 1.57°, 1.64°, 0.82° in F-E, LB and AR respectively was estimated in the model when compared to in vitro human response. The reproduceable 3D printed analogue model described herein can be a valid substitute for cadaveric lumbar motion segments within the explored context of use. @article{1Manu2022, author = {Dukkipati, Siril Teja and Driscoll, Mark}, doi = {10.2139/ssrn.4154354}, issn = {1556-5068}, journal = {SSRN Electronic Journal}, title = {Development and Biomechanical Evaluation of a 3D Printed Analogue Lumbar Spine Motion Segment}, url = {https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4154354}, year = {2022}, dimensions = {true}, google_scholar_id = {9yKSN-GCB0IC}, } I am active on my emails for anyone reaching out to me. © Copyright 2024 Siril Teja Dukkipati. Last updated: August 01, 2024.