reedip.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
75.119.202.126
Public Scan
URL:
https://reedip.com/
Submission: On October 16 via api from US — Scanned from US
Submission: On October 16 via api from US — Scanned from US
Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOMGET /index.php
<form id="searchform" method="get" action="/index.php">
<div style="text-align:center">
<p><input type="text" name="s" id="s" size="15"></p>
<p><input type="submit" name="submit" value="Search"></p>
</div>
</form>
Text Content
* Home * About REED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Information about software patents Wed 8 May 2013 EFFECT OF FIRST TO FILE Posted by admin under Uncategorized Comments Off on Effect of First to File Now that the US is a first to file country, what does that mean for patent process. Speed is critical now but are inventors able to file quickly. My experience is know. Most inventors were taking all the time they could to file before, so how do inventors and companies speed that up now., There are some software tools out there to build quick provisional applications, so maybe those will be the answer. Maybe law firms will change the way they do business to help focus on speed? Tags: Thu 6 Dec 2012 USPTO HEAD STEPPING DOWN Posted by admin under Uncategorized Comments Off on USPTO head stepping down David Kappos is stepping down at the USPTO. How will this affect the patent office? How will it affect software patents? How will this affect AIA. Interesting article at ArsTechnica http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/11/software-patent-booster-to-step-down-as-head-of-patent-office/ Tags: Mon 27 Aug 2012 Posted by admin under Uncategorized Comments Off on So what will be the aftermath of the 1 billion dollar verdict against Samsung. Some say it will hurt consumer choice. Others say it will help protect the innovator ( in this case, Apple ). Some say it is just a biased verdict in a case tried in Apple’s back yard. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9230604/Jury_decides_in_Apple_s_favor_Samsung_hit_with_1B_damages Tags: Mon 18 Jun 2012 USPTO SATELLITE OFFICE IN DETROIT Posted by admin under Uncategorized Comments Off on USPTO Satellite office in Detroit The USPTO will open its first satellite office this summer in Detroit. Outside of Washington, this should be a good thing. Hopefully increase the talent pool for examiners since the USPTO can pull from a larger geographic area. However, really going virtual would be better. Not sure physical offices are that important in today’s world. I bet there are a lot of people out there that could be very good examiners if they could work from home in a part time capacity. Could really have examiners stay in a niche they know very well. Tags: Wed 30 Nov 2011 IS FIRST-TO-FILE GOOD OR BAD? Posted by admin under Uncategorized Comments Off on Is First-to-File good or bad? One of the major aspects of the new patent law is a switch from first to invent to first to file. The main reason for the change was to standardize with the rest of the world. However, I think the main attractiveness is its simplicity. You can give priority based on a simple filing date instead of figuring out who actually invented first. However, some studies suggest it hurts small business ( http://www.forbes.com/sites/ciocentral/2011/09/20/new-patent-law-means-trouble-for-tech-entrepreneurs/ ). It is true that the small inventor doesn’t have attorneys on staff to remind them to file and that may cause them to miss the advantages of filing early. Seems like getting the word out to EVERYONE about the new law may be the key. Right now, I suspect 99% of the population has no idea anything is changing. Only us patent attorneys know. Tags: Mon 8 Aug 2011 PATENTS AND THE MOBILE PHONE Posted by admin under Uncategorized Comments Off on Patents and the Mobile Phone Fascinating article about how patent infringement is affecting the mobile phone operating system landscape. The Rise of Android and why it could be about to Crumble As a consumer, I understand people don’t like the prices of things being higher because of patent fees, but seems like the crux of this story is that Microsoft and Apple ( and others ) invested in the mobile phone market early and developed something innovative. Isn’t that the point of the patent system and, if Microsoft if making money off those innovations, isn’t that fair. If some “little” guy out there had developed the same thing, I think people would be pulling for them. Perhaps the real unfairness in the system is that there is some “little” guy out there that had the same ideas ( and maybe even patents ), but not the resources to play the patent litigation game (often called the sport of kings in the legal world because it is so expensive ) Tags: Mon 17 Jan 2011 ANOTHER DAY, ANOTHER DOLLAR SIPHONED OFF… Posted by admin under Uncategorized Comments Off on Another day, another dollar siphoned off… Will the new Congress take any action toward the patent system. Probably not high on Congress’s legislative agenda, but, seems like if growing new companies is on the agenda, something ought to be done to speed up the process? Whether you are pro-patent or anti-patent, the current system charges fees that only go partially to the patent office and thereby keep it unable to respond quickly to applications. ipwatchdog wrote an interesting article outlining what congress ought to do in 2011 ( http://ipwatchdog.com/2011/01/16/patent-legislative-agenda-what-congress-should-do-in-2011/id=14381/ ) Their proposed agenda is probably too much, but doing something to make the process speed up seems like it would help everyone ( except maybe us patent attorneys that charge by the hour ) Tags: Tue 6 Jul 2010 BILSKI DECIDED Posted by admin under Software Patents Comments Off on Bilski decided We were all waiting for Bilski and now it is hear…, but not much changed. No clear guidance, but at least innovation lives on. See the Washington Post and tech news for more info. Tags: Bilski Thu 25 Mar 2010 WAITING FOR BILSKI Posted by admin under Software Patents Comments Off on Waiting for Bilski Amazing how much uncertainty is out there in patent law while we all wait for the Supreme Court. We have gone from State Street which seemed to allow amost everything to be patented to rumors of really restrictive interpretation that may cut out huge areas of technology in the US. Found this excellent analysis of what may come at in this Commentary by John A. Squires and Duane R. Valz I think most assume the machine or transformation test at least will stick around, but you never know. Seems like some see the patent system as a thing of the past and want to limit it out of existence. I, for one , wish they could reorient the system to fit more with modern technology, but think we need a system to reward the innovators. This is especially true in the technology field where information flows so freely that trade secrets just don’t suffice. Tags: Bilski Wed 3 Feb 2010 EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE MAY RELAX SOFTWARE PATENT RULES Posted by admin under Uncategorized Comments Off on European Patent Office may relax software patent rules The future of software patents remains unclear in the US as Bilski makes is considered by the Supreme Court. In the meantime, looks like Europe might be willing to accept them. See this article European Union: EPO Considers Relaxing Software Patent Rules Tags: Next Page » * PAGES * * About * RECENT POSTS * * Effect of First to File * USPTO head stepping down * (no title) * USPTO Satellite office in Detroit * Is First-to-File good or bad? * BLOGROLL * * United States Patent and Trademark Office * SEARCH: * * GUIDES * View a guide about Software Patents at Zakta.com Reed Intellectual Property is powered by WordPress 6.6.2 and delivered to you in 1.578 seconds using 41 queries. Theme: Connections Reloaded by Ajay D'Souza. Derived from Connections.