www.washingtonpost.com Open in urlscan Pro
23.202.23.129  Public Scan

URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2024/03/08/daylight-saving-time-debate-mexico-end/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=e...
Submission: On March 08 via api from BE — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

<form class="w-100 left" id="registration-form" data-qa="regwall-registration-form-container">
  <div>
    <div class="wpds-c-QqrcX wpds-c-QqrcX-iPJLV-css">
      <div class="wpds-c-iQOSPq"><span role="label" id="radix-0" class="wpds-c-hdyOns wpds-c-iJWmNK">Enter email address</span><input id="registration-email-id" type="text" aria-invalid="false" name="registration-email"
          data-qa="regwall-registration-form-email-input" data-private="true" class="wpds-c-djFMBQ wpds-c-djFMBQ-iPJLV-css" value="" aria-labelledby="radix-0"></div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="dn">
    <div class="db mt-xs mb-xs "><span role="label" id="radix-1" class="wpds-c-hdyOns"><span class="db font-xxxs gray-darker pt-xxs pb-xxs gray-dark" style="padding-top: 1px;"><span>By selecting "Start reading," you agree to The Washington Post's
            <a target="_blank" style="color:inherit;" class="underline" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/information/2022/01/01/terms-of-service/">Terms of Service</a> and
            <a target="_blank" style="color:inherit;" class="underline" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/privacy-policy/">Privacy Policy</a>.</span></span></span>
      <div class="db gray-dark relative flex pt-xxs pb-xxs items-start gray-darker"><span role="label" id="radix-2" class="wpds-c-hdyOns wpds-c-jDXwHV"><button type="button" role="checkbox" aria-checked="false" data-state="unchecked" value="on"
            id="mcCheckbox" data-testid="mcCheckbox" class="wpds-c-cqTwYl wpds-c-cqTwYl-bnVAXI-size-125 wpds-c-cqTwYl-kFjMjo-cv wpds-c-cqTwYl-ikKWKCv-css" aria-labelledby="radix-2"></button><input type="checkbox" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
            value="on" style="transform: translateX(-100%); position: absolute; pointer-events: none; opacity: 0; margin: 0px; width: 0px; height: 0px;"><span class="wpds-c-bFeFXz"><span class="relative db gray-darker" style="padding-top: 2px;"><span
                class="relative db font-xxxs" style="padding-top: 1px;"><span>The Washington Post may use my email address to provide me occasional special offers via email and through other platforms. I can opt out at any
                  time.</span></span></span></span></span></div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div id="subs-turnstile-hook" class="center dn"></div><button data-qa="regwall-registration-form-cta-button" type="submit"
    class="wpds-c-kSOqLF wpds-c-kSOqLF-hDKJFr-variant-cta wpds-c-kSOqLF-eHdizY-density-default wpds-c-kSOqLF-ejCoEP-icon-left wpds-c-kSOqLF-ikFyhzm-css w-100 mt-sm"><span>Start reading</span></button>
</form>

Text Content

Accessibility statementSkip to main content

Democracy Dies in Darkness
SubscribeSign in



Advertisement


Close
The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness
HealthHealth Care Medical Mysteries Science Well+Being
HealthHealth Care Medical Mysteries Science Well+Being



MEXICO GOT RID OF DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME. SHOULD THE U.S. END IT, TOO?

By Dan Diamond
and 
María Gabriela Martinez
March 8, 2024 at 6:00 a.m. EST

Mexico’s decision to end daylight saving time is just the latest wrinkle in a
long-running debate about how to set the world’s clocks. (Eduardo Verdugo/AP)

Listen
9 min

Share
Comment on this storyComment1374
Add to your saved stories
Save

Most Americans on Sunday will “spring forward,” the annual ritual of advancing
our clocks by an hour in a bid to capture more sunlight — while dealing with the
inevitable grogginess and health risks that result.


WpGet the full experience.Choose your planArrowRight


But most Mexicans won’t adjust their clocks this spring after their country
ended daylight saving time and stopped springing forward last year, a policy
that local experts and officials say has led to better sleep and other benefits.



“For many people, this [clock] change was the start of a problem,” such as
chronic insomnia and other sleep disorders, said Guadalupe Terán Pérez, a sleep
medicine physician in Mexico City and past president of the Sociedad Mexicana
Para la Investigación y Medicina del Sueño, the Mexican medical society for
sleep research.

Story continues below advertisement



“Now, we don’t have this change — and many people sleep better,” she added,
estimating that perhaps 10 to 15 percent fewer Mexicans would develop sleep
disorders because the country put daylight saving time to bed.

Advertisement


Mexico’s decision is just the latest wrinkle in a long-running debate about how
to set the world’s clocks, with the global population split across political and
geographic lines. Most of the United States and many countries in Europe observe
daylight saving time, moving their clocks forward an hour in the spring and
rolling them back in the fall, a policy that took hold amid arguments that it
would help maximize energy expenditures during World War I.

Some lawmakers in the United States are pushing to go further, endorsing a plan
for year-round daylight saving time to maximize sunlight during working hours in
the winter. Congressional leaders and the White House have hit the snooze button
on the plan, with the legislation stalled in committee.

Story continues below advertisement



Meanwhile, most countries follow what’s known as standard time, which sleep
experts say more naturally aligns with the body’s circadian rhythms and is
linked to healthier outcomes.

Advertisement


Sleep experts said Mexico is right to return to standard time — and Americans
should stop fidgeting with their clocks twice per year, too.

“It’s a great example for us, Europe and the rest of the world,” said Lourdes
DelRosso, a sleep medicine physician at the University of California at San
Francisco-Fresno and co-chair of this month’s World Sleep Day awareness event.

“Having that sense of permanence and not flip-flopping is a good thing,” added
Sairam Parthasarathy, director of the Center for Sleep and Circadian Sciences at
the University of Arizona Health Sciences, who said he and many of his sleep
medicine colleagues support ending daylight saving time in the United States.
“The feeling is [Mexico] got there before we did.”

Story continues below advertisement



None of the sleep researchers or U.S. sleep medicine societies contacted by The
Washington Post was aware of studies into Mexicans’ sleep habits after the
country’s clock changes were effectively halted last year. But they all pointed
to existing research showing twice-a-year clock changes are linked to health
problems, such as elevated risk of heart attack and stroke, arguing the evidence
is clear that “springing forward” carries unnecessary risks.

Advertisement


“While we approve of Mexico going to standard time and do think that it will be
best for outcomes like health and mental health, we don’t know quite yet,” said
Karin Johnson, a sleep medicine physician who is a member of the American
Academy of Sleep Medicine’s advocacy committee and co-chair of the Coalition for
Permanent Standard Time.

Several physicians shared anecdotes affirming Mexico’s new policy, with
Parthasarathy recounting his team’s care for patients along the border, and
Terán Pérez discussing her experience treating patients inside the country.

Story continues below advertisement



“Our clinical experience shows improved sleep in most people during this period
of time,” Terán Pérez said, discussing her and her colleagues’ work in Mexico
City.

IN MEXICO, THE TIME HAD COME

While Americans have spent more than a century living under daylight saving
time, Mexicans have been far more ambivalent about clock changes. The country
adopted daylight saving time in 1996 — copying the U.S. policy to spring forward
in April and “fall back” in October — but its leaders balked when U.S. lawmakers
extended daylight saving time by three weeks in 2007.

Advertisement


Mexico in 2022 moved to abolish the practice altogether, a shift backed by
President Andrés Manuel López Obrador. In a public messaging campaign, the
Mexican president and top aides argued that the clock changes had led to health
issues, educational problems such as student drowsiness, and other drawbacks.
López Obrador’s administration released polling showing that 71 percent of
Mexicans opposed daylight saving time.



“The first thing we should consider is that the choice of daylight saving time
is political and can therefore be changed,” Jorge Alcocer Varela, Mexico’s
health secretary, said at a news conference in July 2022.

Story continues below advertisement



“If we want to improve our health, we should not fight against our biological
clock,” he added, arguing that daylight saving time was unnatural and calling
for a return to “God’s clock” instead.

Advertisement


The president’s legislation was quickly taken up by Mexican lawmakers, such as
Cuauhtémoc Ochoa Fernández, who helped shepherd the time change through the
country’s legislature.

Share this articleShare

“Daylight saving time did NOT meet the savings that were promised to Mexicans;
on the contrary, electricity costs increased and it affected their health,”
Ochoa wrote in a social media post in October 2022, as government officials
formally ended daylight saving time and much of Mexico prepared to “fall back”
for the last time.

Story continues below advertisement



Some areas of Mexico, including cities near the U.S. border, have preserved
daylight saving time.



One reason for Mexicans’ cool feelings toward daylight saving time: Their days
are frequently sunnier than those of their neighbors north of the border,
particularly in the darkest times of the year. That has led to less public
pressure to shift hours in an attempt to stretch daylight.

Advertisement


For instance, on Dec. 21 — when Earth’s northern axis will be tilted the
farthest from the sun all year — Mexico City will receive about 90 minutes more
sunlight than Washington, because Mexico’s capital city is far closer to Earth’s
equator.

POLITICIANS ON THE CLOCK

In the United States, daylight saving time has led to unusual bipartisan
alliances, with lawmakers brought together by geography rather than politics.

Story continues below advertisement



For instance, the Sunshine Protection Act, which would create year-round
daylight saving time, is supported by Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), rated by one
data-analysis website as the most conservative senator in the last Congress, and
Sen. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), rated the second most liberal senator.

“This is not politics here. This is doing something for the American people,”
said Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), a backer of the bill, arguing that it would
help farmers and other residents of his mostly rural state enjoy more time
outdoors.

Advertisement


The battle lines around the issue, which reflect how time zones are drawn, are
well established: Daylight saving time in the winter would favor coastal cities
like Boston and Miami more than Midwestern cities such as Detroit and
Indianapolis, where the sun would not rise until after 9 a.m.

Story continues below advertisement



The political risk enveloping the issue also is well established. U.S. lawmakers
in 1973 enacted year-round daylight saving time, arguing it was a necessary move
during an energy crisis. But Congress quickly repealed the law amid widespread
reports that darker winter mornings led to more car accidents and drearier
moods.

The Senate’s decision to abruptly pass year-round daylight saving time two years
ago also provoked a flurry of lobbying, freezing the bill in the House as
lawmakers said they couldn’t decide what to do.

Advertisement


“There isn’t a consensus, in my opinion in the House, or even generally at this
point, about whether we should have standard versus daylight saving as the
permanent time,” then-House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone
Jr. (D-N.J.) told The Post in March 2022. “Immediately after the Senate passed
the bill, I had members come up to me on the floor and say, ‘Oh, don’t do that.
I want the standard time.’”

Tuberville said he’s considering the same legislative maneuver that he and other
senators executed two years ago, when they bought their permanent daylight
saving time bill directly to the floor and passed it in a voice vote — to the
surprise of some senators who weren’t in attendance, and many Americans who
weren’t even aware that permanent daylight time was under consideration in
Congress.

“Can we pull it off again on the Senate floor? I don’t know, but we’ve got a lot
of Democrats for it,” Tuberville mused.

Advocates for permanent standard time have been working to mount a political
counterattack, noting that Hawaii and most of Arizona already have opted out of
daylight saving time and other states can join them. States are allowed to enact
permanent standard time, but permanent daylight saving time is not federally
approved.

Mexico’s experience ending daylight saving time offers a “learning lesson” on
the need for proactive communication and technical fixes, said Johnson, of the
American Academy of Sleep Medicine. She noted that computer systems around
Mexico had to be quickly updated to accommodate the new time rules.

But “in the long term, it’ll be easier,” Johnson added, because Mexicans don’t
need to shift their clocks again.

While U.S. leaders toss and turn over time-change policies, the issue is seen as
settled in Mexico.

“Since [daylight saving time] was eliminated, no one has talked about it again,”
a representative for Ochoa wrote in response to emailed questions from The Post.
“There is no interest in reestablishing Daylight Saving Time, since to date
there is no indicator that shows its benefits.”

Share
1374 Comments



Loading...


Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan →


Advertisement



Advertisement

TOP STORIES
Advice
Moral dilemmas, relationships, parenting and more
Ask Amy: My boyfriend is offended I don’t want him at my academic conference


Carolyn Hax: Wedding guests melt down over rules for which kids get invited


Ask Sahaj: Conservative parents don’t approve of Indian boyfriend I met online


Refresh
Try a different topic

Sign in or create a free account to save your preferences
Advertisement


Advertisement

Company
About The Post Newsroom Policies & Standards Diversity & Inclusion Careers Media
& Community Relations WP Creative Group Accessibility Statement Sitemap
Get The Post
Become a Subscriber Gift Subscriptions Mobile & Apps Newsletters & Alerts
Washington Post Live Reprints & Permissions Post Store Books & E-Books Print
Archives (Subscribers Only) Today’s Paper Public Notices Coupons
Contact Us
Contact the Newsroom Contact Customer Care Contact the Opinions Team Advertise
Licensing & Syndication Request a Correction Send a News Tip Report a
Vulnerability
Terms of Use
Digital Products Terms of Sale Print Products Terms of Sale Terms of Service
Privacy Policy Cookie Settings Submissions & Discussion Policy RSS Terms of
Service Ad Choices
washingtonpost.com © 1996-2024 The Washington Post
 * washingtonpost.com
 * © 1996-2024 The Washington Post
 * About The Post
 * Contact the Newsroom
 * Contact Customer Care
 * Request a Correction
 * Send a News Tip
 * Report a Vulnerability
 * Download the Washington Post App
 * Policies & Standards
 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Settings
 * Print Products Terms of Sale
 * Digital Products Terms of Sale
 * Submissions & Discussion Policy
 * RSS Terms of Service
 * Ad Choices
 * Coupons

5.12.2








WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

We and our 45 partners store and/or access information on a device, such as
unique IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your
choices by clicking below, including your right to object where legitimate
interest is used, or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will
be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data.

If you click “I accept,” in addition to processing data using cookies and
similar technologies for the purposes to the right, you also agree we may
process the profile information you provide and your interactions with our
surveys and other interactive content for personalized advertising.

If you do not accept, we will process cookies and associated data for strictly
necessary purposes and process non-cookie data as set forth in our Privacy
Policy (consistent with law and, if applicable, other choices you have made).


WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS COOKIE DATA TO PROVIDE:

Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Create profiles for
personalised advertising. Use profiles to select personalised advertising.
Create profiles to personalise content. Use profiles to select personalised
content. Measure advertising performance. Measure content performance.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different
sources. Develop and improve services. Store and/or access information on a
device. Use limited data to select content. Use limited data to select
advertising. List of Partners (vendors)

I Accept Reject All Show Purposes


Already have an account? Sign in

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


TWO WAYS TO READ THIS ARTICLE:

Create an account or sign in
Free
 * Access this article

Enter email address
By selecting "Start reading," you agree to The Washington Post's Terms of
Service and Privacy Policy.
The Washington Post may use my email address to provide me occasional special
offers via email and through other platforms. I can opt out at any time.

Start reading
Subscribe
€2every 4 weeks
 * Unlimited access to all articles
 * Save stories to read later

Subscribe