www.covid19businessguidance.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
2606:4700:3035::6815:3d15
Public Scan
Submitted URL: http://www.covid19businessguidance.com/
Effective URL: https://www.covid19businessguidance.com/
Submission: On January 03 via manual from US — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://www.covid19businessguidance.com/
Submission: On January 03 via manual from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
3 forms found in the DOMGET https://www.covid19businessguidance.com
<form method="get" class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_search_form" action="https://www.covid19businessguidance.com" role="search">
<label class="screen-reader-text" for="lxb_af-s-417601">Search…</label>
<!--[if IE 9]>
<input class='lxb_af-template_tags-get_search_form-search' type='search' id='lxb_af-s-417601' value='Search…' name='s'>
<![endif]-->
<!--[if !(IE 9)]><!-->
<input class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_search_form-search" type="search" placeholder="Search…" id="lxb_af-s-417601" name="s">
<!--<![endif]-->
<button class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_search_form-submit lxb_af-button" value="Search"><span class="screen-reader-text">Search</span> <span class="icon-search"></span></button>
</form>
GET https://www.covid19businessguidance.com
<form method="get" class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_search_form" action="https://www.covid19businessguidance.com" role="search">
<label class="screen-reader-text" for="lxb_af-s-285531">Search…</label>
<!--[if IE 9]>
<input class='lxb_af-template_tags-get_search_form-search' type='search' id='lxb_af-s-285531' value='Search…' name='s'>
<![endif]-->
<!--[if !(IE 9)]><!-->
<input class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_search_form-search" type="search" placeholder="Search…" id="lxb_af-s-285531" name="s">
<!--<![endif]-->
<button class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_search_form-submit lxb_af-button" value="Search"><span class="screen-reader-text">Search</span> <span class="icon-search"></span></button>
</form>
POST https://www.covid19businessguidance.com/#lxb_mct-form-1
<form class="lxb_mct_subscribe_widget_form " action="https://www.covid19businessguidance.com/#lxb_mct-form-1" method="post">
<label class="" for="lxb_mct-form-1"><i class="icon-envelope"></i> Subscribe to this blog</label>
<input type="email" class="" id="lxb_mct-form-1" name="mc_email" placeholder="Enter Your Email Address...">
<label for="mc_website-lxb_mct-form-1" class="mc_website_label screen-reader-text ">Your website url</label>
<input type="text" id="mc_website-lxb_mct-form-1" class="mc_website " tabindex="-1" aria-hidden="true" name="mc_website" value="Website">
<input type="submit" class="" id="mc_submit-lxb_mct-form-1" name="mc_submit" value="Subscribe">
<input type="hidden" name="mc_input_id" value="lxb_mct-form-1">
<input type="hidden" name="mc_list_id" value="e542e1315b">
<input type="hidden" name="mc_redirect_to" value="">
<input type="hidden" id="mc_load_time-lxb_mct-form-1" name="mc_load_time" value="0">
</form>
Text Content
Skip to content MENU Current Page:HomeOur TeamServicesContact Search… Search CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19): GUIDANCE FOR BUSINESSES Helping Maintain Business Operations CDC SHORTENS THE RECOMMENDED ISOLATION AND QUARANTINE PERIOD By Lauren Kulpa & Jill L. Ripke on December 28, 2021 Posted in Business Operations, Employment, Healthcare In an updated guidance released on December 27, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reduced the recommended isolation and quarantine period for the general population. The term “isolation” refers to the recommended behavior after a confirmed COVID-19 infection, while “quarantine” is the term that applies to the period following a person’s exposure to the virus or close contact with someone who has COVID-19. According to CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the Omicron variant is spreading quickly, and the “CDC’s updated recommendations for isolation and quarantine balance what we know about the spread of the virus and the protection provided by vaccination and booster doses.” Continue Reading CDC Shortens the Recommended Isolation and Quarantine Period EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn SIXTH CIRCUIT GRANTS THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S MOTION TO DISSOLVE THE STAY OF THE OSHA VACCINE ETS By Heather M. Sager & Matthew Goldberg on December 18, 2021 Posted in Business Operations, Employment, Healthcare On December 17, 2021, the Sixth Circuit granted the Biden Administration’s motion to Dissolve the Stay of the OSHA Vaccine ETS, which was issued by the Fifth Circuit on November 5, 2021. See link to full opinion. Judge Stranch (an Obama appointee) authored the opinion, which Judge Gibbons (a Bush appointee) joined. Judge Larsen (a Trump appointee) dissented. Unlike other appellate panels that have considered vaccine mandates, the Sixth Circuit specifically held that the Vaccine ETS was: (1) within OSHA’s authority; (2) not covered by the major questions doctrine (as the Fifth Circuit and the challengers contended); and (3) promulgated with more than sufficient justification based on the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the Sixth Circuit rejected petitioners’ commerce clause and non-delegation arguments. Notably, in lifting the stay, the Sixth Circuit concluded that Petitioners could not demonstrate the requisite likelihood of success on the merits or show irreparable injury, both of which are required for an injunction. This ruling could serve as a blueprint for local appellate courts to uphold vaccine mandates imposed on a state level. On November 12, 2021, OSHA announced that it would not attempt to enforce the ETS while the stay was in place. Now that the stay has been lifted, it remains to be seen how OSHA will address enforcement and compliance as the merits of the case proceed. In the meantime, Petitioners are expected to seek review en banc or to appeal directly to the United States Supreme Court. In the meantime, the state of Ohio trucking industry organizations, conservative advocacy groups, and other opponents of the rule petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to block the OSHA. OSHA has announced that it will not issue citations for noncompliance with any requirements of the ETS before January 10 and will not issue citations for noncompliance with the standard’s testing requirements before February 9, so long as an employer is exercising reasonable, good faith efforts to come into compliance with the standard. Businesses and individuals with questions should contact experienced counsel for guidance on new policies and practices. EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn CAL/OSHA REVISES COVID-19 EMERGENCY TEMPORARY STANDARDS TO REMOVE DISTINCTIONS FOR VACCINATED WORKERS By Matthew Goldberg, Dana Svendsen & Jessica Millar on December 17, 2021 Posted in Employment The California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (Board) readopted a revised version of its earlier Emergency Temporary Standards (Standard) for employers on preventing the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace on December 16, 2021. The revised Standard was readopted by a 6-1 vote in the form proposed by the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Division) and will take effect on January 14, 2022, for a period of 90 days. Continue Reading Cal/OSHA Revises COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards to Remove Distinctions for Vaccinated Workers EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn EEOC UPDATES ITS COVID-19 RELATED GUIDANCE By Jill L. Ripke & Adam Weiner on December 15, 2021 Posted in Employment, Labor Relations On December 14, 2021, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) updated its guidance to affirm that workers who contract COVID-19 can be protected from discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Depending on an individual employee’s specific circumstances, COVID-19 may constitute a protected physical or mental disability, may serve as the basis for an employer’s perception that an employee has a disability, and/or may contribute to a record of employee impairment. Continue Reading EEOC Updates Its COVID-19 Related Guidance EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn CALIFORNIA REINSTITUTES MASK MANDATE By Jill L. Ripke, Matthew Goldberg & Jessica Millar on December 14, 2021 Posted in Business Operations On December 13, 2021, the California Department of Health (CPDH) reinstituted a statewide mask mandate. From December 15, 2021 through at least January 15, 2022, all individuals will be required to wear masks in indoor public settings. The mandate applies regardless of vaccination status. The mandate exempts children under two, persons with medical conditions or disabilities that prevent masking, hearing impaired persons, and persons for whom masking would create a risk related to their work (as defined by regulations and workplace safety guidelines). The mandate does not provide exemptions for certain businesses or industries. Additionally, CPDH updated requirements for attending mega events, like concerts and sporting events. Prior to attending an event, attendees will now require either proof of vaccination, a negative antigen COVID-19 test within one day of the event, or a negative PCR test within two days of the event. Businesses and individuals with questions should contact experienced counsel for guidance on new policies and practices. EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn SIXTH CIRCUIT REJECTS REQUEST TO EXPEDITE BRIEFING TO DISSOLVE INJUNCTION OF VACCINE EMERGENCY TEMPORARY STANDARD By Perkins Coie & Matthew Goldberg on December 6, 2021 Posted in Business Operations, Employment On December 3, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected, without analysis, the Biden administration’s request to expedite the briefing schedule on the issue of whether to dissolve an injunction from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which stayed enforcement of Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s vaccine Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). The Fifth Circuit’s November 12 order is summarized here and the initial stay is summarized here. Parties must file briefs opposing the Biden administration’s motion by December 7, and the government must respond by December 10. As a result, the stay will remain in place beyond the ETS December 6 deadline, which requires employers with 100 or more employees to develop a vaccine policy, determine employee vaccination status, and provide leave for worker vaccination or recovery. The ETS is summarized here. Notably, the Sixth Circuit still has not determined whether a panel of three judges or the full Sixth Circuit will hear the challenges to the ETS. Employers should consult experienced legal counsel for the most up-to-date advice on vaccine policies and the status of the ETS. EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn VACCINE MANDATE FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS BLOCKED BY FEDERAL COURT IN KENTUCKY By Christopher Wilkinson on December 2, 2021 Posted in Business Operations, Employment On November 30, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky granted a preliminary injunction blocking the federal government from moving forward with the COVID-19 protocols for federal contractors issued by the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force (Task Force) and promulgated by President Biden in Executive Order 14042. Under the guidance issued by the Task Force, employees of covered federal contractors and those working “in connection with” federal contracts must be fully vaccinated by January 18, 2022. This case, brought by Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee, is one of many challenges that have been brought against the vaccine mandate in federal courts around the country. However, this decision prohibits enforcement of the vaccine mandate only for covered federal contractors and subcontractors in covered contracts in Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee. Continue Reading Vaccine Mandate for Federal Contractors Blocked by Federal Court in Kentucky EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn SIXTH CIRCUIT TO HEAR CHALLENGES TO OSHA’S NEW EMERGENCY TEMPORARY STANDARD By Jill L. Ripke, Ben Prager & Christopher Wilkinson on November 17, 2021 Posted in Business Operations, Employment, Healthcare On November 16, 2021, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation randomly assigned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to hear legal challenges to the vaccine emergency temporary standard (ETS) issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The ETS, affecting employers with 100 or more employees, is summarized here. The Sixth Circuit panel will now consolidate all existing petitions and rule on challenges to the ETS. The court has not yet made any decisions or set any briefing schedules. Five petitions have already been filed in the Sixth Circuit, consolidated under the case Bentkey Services v. OSHA. It is likely that the panel will ultimately review and address the stay issued by the Fifth Circuit, described here. The Sixth Circuit has more judges appointed by Republican presidents than Democratic presidents and is generally thought to lean conservative although it is unknown what panel will hear the case. It is possible that the challenges will eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court. OSHA has announced that it will not move forward with enforcement of the ETS while these legal challenges are pending. Employers should continue to monitor developments in this quickly changing legal landscape and consult with experienced legal counsel regarding any questions about the status and implementation of the ETS, including the applicability of any state laws and regulations regarding vaccination. EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn FIFTH CIRCUIT STAYS OSHA’S NEW EMERGENCY TEMPORARY STANDARD By Jill L. Ripke, Christopher Wilkinson & Ben Prager on November 15, 2021 Posted in Business Operations, Employment, Healthcare, Labor Relations On November 12, 2021, a panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 22-page order reaffirming the initial stay of a vaccine emergency temporary standard (ETS) issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The ETS, affecting employers with 100 or more employees, is summarized here. The three-judge panel determined that OSHA did not have legal authority to issue the ETS. Among other concerns stated in the decision, the panel determined that OSHA’s mandate did not meet the high bar to issue an emergency standard because it had not sufficiently established a grave danger. Also, the panel found that the ETS’s vaccine or testing requirements were overbroad (by setting forth a standard requirement for workplaces regardless of the specific hazards present in individual workplaces) and underinclusive (by exempting many vulnerable workers in workplaces with fewer than 100 employees). Based on these and other legal infirmities, the panel held that the challenges to the ETS were likely to succeed on the merits, which supported the request for a stay. The panel also stated that the ETS would remain stayed pending adequate judicial review of the request for a permanent injunction and ordered OSHA to take no steps to implement or enforce the ETS until further court order. Continue Reading Fifth Circuit Stays OSHA’s New Emergency Temporary Standard EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn MANDATORY VACCINE UPDATE FOR EMPLOYERS WITH 100 OR MORE EMPLOYEES By Matthew Goldberg, Heather M. Sager & Christopher Wilkinson on November 7, 2021 Posted in Business Operations, Employment, Healthcare On November 6, 2021, in a per curiam opinion, a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal panel temporarily enjoined the new Occupational Health and Safety Administration’s vaccine Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”) for employers with 100 or more employees. A copy of the opinion is available here. Our prior blog post on the ETS is available here. The Fifth Circuit did not provide further analysis or comment, and did not specify whether the injunction was meant to be nationwide in scope. Notably, this ruling does not mean employers cannot elect to voluntarily impose mandatory vaccine policies, nor does the ruling mean that those policies are illegal. The stay may be exceptionally short lived because next week one federal circuit will be selected via lottery to handle the consolidated case on this issue (4 challenges have been filed thus far), and the selected circuit could reverse the stay. Challengers to the ETS have a 10-day window to file their petitions so they can be included in the lottery, which will determine which circuit court gets possession of the consolidated case. Also, the Fifth Circuit in its opinion ordered expedited additional briefing from the Biden Administration on Monday and the petitioners on Tuesday, but it is unclear when or if the Fifth Circuit will take additional action. Employers should consult experienced legal counsel for the most up-to-date advice on vaccine policies and the status of the ETS. EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn POST NAVIGATION Older Posts Search… Search ABOUT THIS BLOG Clients rely on Perkins Coie for advice and guidance in the face of an emergency. For those currently dealing with the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and those anticipating its effects, our attorneys are helping businesses respond and prepare. STAY CONNECTED Facebook LinkedIn RSS Twitter youtube Perkins Coie LLP Subscribe to this blog Your website url TOPICS * Business Operations * CARES Act * Construction * Consumer Protection * Contracts * Employment * Government Contracts * Healthcare * Immigration * Insurance * Investment Management/Broker-Dealer * Labor Law Reform * Labor Relations * Oil & Gas * Real Estate and Land Use * Uncategorized ARCHIVES Archives Select Month December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 RECENT POSTS * CDC Shortens the Recommended Isolation and Quarantine Period * Sixth Circuit Grants the Biden Administration’s Motion to Dissolve the Stay of the OSHA Vaccine ETS * Cal/OSHA Revises COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards to Remove Distinctions for Vaccinated Workers * EEOC Updates Its COVID-19 Related Guidance * California Reinstitutes Mask Mandate CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19): GUIDANCE FOR BUSINESSES Helping Maintain Business Operations Facebook LinkedIn RSS Twitter youtube Perkins Coie LLP Perkins Coie LLP Anchorage|Beijing|Bellevue|Boise|Chicago|Dallas|Los Angeles|Madison|New York|Palo Alto|Phoenix|Portland|San Diego|San Francisco|Seattle|Shanghai|Taipei|Washington, D.C. |Denver|Austin DisclaimerPrivacy Policy ABOUT THIS BLOG Clients rely on Perkins Coie for advice and guidance in the face of an emergency. For those currently dealing with the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and those anticipating its effects, our attorneys are helping businesses respond and prepare. Copyright © 2022, Perkins Coie LLP All Rights Reserved. Powered By LexBlog