www.nytimes.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.129.164  Public Scan

URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/10/business/the-elusive-fix-for-chinas-budget-crisis.html
Submission: On May 11 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

POST https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/10/business/the-elusive-fix-for-chinas-budget-crisis.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083

<form method="post" action="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/10/business/the-elusive-fix-for-chinas-budget-crisis.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"
  data-testid="MagicLinkForm" style="visibility: hidden;"><input name="client_id" type="hidden" value="web.fwk.vi"><input name="redirect_uri" type="hidden"
    value="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/10/business/the-elusive-fix-for-chinas-budget-crisis.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"><input name="response_type"
    type="hidden" value="code"><input name="state" type="hidden" value="no-state"><input name="scope" type="hidden" value="default"></form>

Text Content

Skip to content

Sections
SEARCH
Business

SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEKLog in
Wednesday, May 10, 2023
Today’s Paper
SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEK
Business|Why China Doesn’t Have a Property Tax

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/10/business/the-elusive-fix-for-chinas-budget-crisis.html
 * Give this article
 * 
 * 
 * 8

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Supported by

Continue reading the main story





WHY CHINA DOESN’T HAVE A PROPERTY TAX

Local governments are sinking further into debt, but after years of talk,
officials have yet to introduce a real estate tax.

 * Send any friend a story
   
   As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can
   read what you share.
   
   
   Give this article
 * 
 * 
 * 8
 * Read in app
   


Public resistance to a property tax is strong. Apartment owners believe that
real estate taxes should be the responsibility of developers.Credit...Qilai Shen
for The New York Times


By Keith Bradsher

Keith Bradsher, who has covered China’s economy for 21 years, reported from
Beijing

May 10, 2023Updated 10:33 p.m. ET

Across China, many local governments are on the brink of insolvency. Some cities
have reduced pay for civil servants. Cuts to municipal health insurance have
triggered street protests.

Central government bailouts are a possibility to rescue cities from their deep
budget problems, but China hasn’t turned to a source of revenue that would be an
obvious option in other countries: property taxes.

In China, where the government owns the land, localities almost never tax
homeowners to support services like schools. Cities rely instead on selling
long-term leases to real estate developers. Revenue from these land sales has
plunged in the past year.

Last month, after a decade-long effort that involved 100,000 workers, China’s
central government said it had finally figured out who even owns 790 million
apartments and other properties. That knowledge means officials in Beijing could
start a nationwide property tax system. But they are not expected to do so
quickly. The obstacles range from the technical (it would be complicated) to the
economic (it would hurt homeowners at a delicate time for the housing market) to
the political (it would expose government officials who own many homes.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



The idea of introducing a property tax is not new. The Communist Party’s Central
Committee, in many ways China’s highest decision-making body, resolved in 2003:
“When conditions permit, a unified and standardized property tax will be levied
on real estate.”

Many economists support a real estate tax, notably Lou Jiwei, a retired finance
minister who remains an intellectual leader among China’s technocrats. “A real
estate tax is the most suitable type of tax as a local tax, and should be
piloted as soon as possible after the economy returns to normal growth,” he
wrote in February.

Mao Zedong, the founder of Communist China, nationalized China’s land from the
1940s through the 1960s, seizing it from affluent families — who were killed in
large numbers — and transferring ownership to the state. Since the 1980s, local
governments have covered many of their costs for road construction, school
operations and other activities by leasing large blocks of that land to
developers.


MORE ON CHINA

 * An Awkward Dance: China’s foreign minister set out on a three-nation trip to
   persuade European leaders that they can do business with Beijing despite its
   close ties to Russia.
 *  Hong Kong: The return of budget tour groups from mainland China has revived
   old tensions and sparked frustrations in a city transformed by Beijing’s
   political crackdown.
 * Rift With Canada: Beijing ordered a Canadian diplomat in Shanghai to leave in
   a tit-for-tat move after Ottawa expelled a Chinese envoy accused of gathering
   information on a Canadian lawmaker. 
 * Foreign Businesses: New security measures and unannounced visits by
   investigators to the Chinese offices of foreign firms have sent a shiver of
   worry that economic pragmatism could be giving way to a heightened focus on
   state control.

Until last year, sales of land leases accounted for 7 percent of the Chinese
economy. By comparison, the average for real estate taxes in the 38
industrialized democracies in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development is 1.9 percent.

The United States is particularly reliant on property taxes. Local governments
collect 3 percent of the country’s gross domestic product each year through
these taxes and spend much of it to pay for public schools.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



For China, raising money through land leases worked well for a long time. But a
slow-motion crash of the housing market has set off bond defaults by dozens of
developers, who have been left struggling to finish apartment projects, much
less to buy land for new ones.



Revenue from land sales over the last several decades has allowed China to keep
other taxes low. Although China calls itself a socialist country, it has
practically no taxes on investment gains, inheritances or personal wealth.
National and local governments rely on a regressive combination of heavy sales
taxes, salary taxes and business taxes, in addition to the land leases to
developers.


Image

An area of Yujiapu, in Tianjin-Binhai, where construction has halted and many
office and commercial buildings remain empty.Credit...Gilles Sabrié for The New
York Times



WHAT KEEPS CHINA FROM IMPOSING A PROPERTY TAX?

Public resistance to a property tax is strong. Apartment owners believe that
real estate taxes should be the responsibility of the developers, who have
already paid the government handsomely for the land to build housing.

“The general complaint is, ‘We have already paid so much for an apartment that
there is no way we’re also going to pay a real estate tax,’ ” said Shitong Qiao,
a Duke University law professor.

A further difficulty is that local officials, who are in charge of devising a
real estate tax, have a lot to lose from one. A perk of civil service jobs has
been the chance to buy apartments for little or nothing, particularly during the
1990s.

With some apartments in big cities selling for several million dollars, and with
senior municipal officials earning only $30,000 or $40,000 a year, imposing a 1
percent annual tax could claim their entire incomes. A tax could also expose the
wealth of officials who speculated in land.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Introducing a property tax could drive down housing prices at a time when
construction in all but the largest cities is weak. Many homeowners are already
worried about losing money on their apartments.

“The smaller cities have a greater need for property taxes to balance their
budget deficits, but their housing markets are also not as strong as in the big
cities,” said Zhu Ning, a professor at the Shanghai Advanced Institute of
Finance.


Image

Many economists support a real estate tax. An office renovation project
overlooking the Xiangyu Free Trade Zone in Xiamen, China.Credit...Qilai Shen for
The New York Times



WHAT COULD CHINA DO TO START TAXING REAL ESTATE?

Last year, the central government studied whether to introduce a “mansion tax”
on the largest and fanciest apartments and houses in China, said two people
familiar with China’s economic policymaking who insisted on anonymity because
they were not authorized to discuss the subject publicly.

But a mansion tax has not advanced because of concern that it could damage
already fragile confidence in the housing market, both of the people said.

A long-term option suggested by overseas experts like Professor Qiao is to
require apartment owners to start paying taxes when the original land leases for
their buildings expire.

A few early land leases after Mao’s death were for as little as 20 years, and
have expired.

But most recent residential land leases have been for 70 years. Waiting decades
to tax many apartments would not help China deal with its current fiscal crisis.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Jia Kang, a former finance ministry research director who still advises the
ministry, said that completing the real estate registration system meant China
was nonetheless making progress toward someday enacting a real estate tax.

“The unified registration of real estate is the most basic prerequisite for
optimizing the management of the real estate market,” he said. “It will also
play a role in supporting a future real estate tax.”

Li You contributed research.







Advertisement

Continue reading the main story




COMMENTS 8

Why China Doesn’t Have a Property TaxSkip to Comments
The comments section is closed. To submit a letter to the editor for
publication, write to letters@nytimes.com.




SITE INDEX




SITE INFORMATION NAVIGATION

 * © 2023 The New York Times Company

 * NYTCo
 * Contact Us
 * Accessibility
 * Work with us
 * Advertise
 * T Brand Studio
 * Your Ad Choices
 * Privacy Policy
 * Terms of Service
 * Terms of Sale
 * Site Map
 * Canada
 * International
 * Help
 * Subscriptions



Support independent journalism.

See subscription options