www.letterformywife.com Open in urlscan Pro
34.149.87.45  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

https://www.letterformywife.com/search

<form class="wdVIxK" data-testid="search-box-form" role="search" action="https://www.letterformywife.com/search">
  <div class="aXOBOn">
    <div class="KsMOVs"></div>
    <div class="ipSfdV" data-testid="search-icon">
      <div class="TmqMif wixui-search-bar__icon"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="5 5 14 14">
          <path fill="currentColor" d="m15.683 14.6 3.265 3.265a.2.2 0 0 1 0 .282l-.8.801a.2.2 0 0 1-.283 0l-3.266-3.265a5.961 5.961 0 1 1 1.084-1.084zm-4.727 1.233a4.877 4.877 0 1 0 0-9.754 4.877 4.877 0 0 0 0 9.754z"></path>
        </svg></div>
    </div>
    <div class="nNn3mc">
      <div class="LYhw1A">
        <div id="search-box-input-comp-lxgr19rx" class="ZXdXNL FwtNU8 wixui-search-bar__input wixui-text-input" data-testid="search-box-input">
          <div class="pUnTVX"><input name="q" id="input_search-box-input-comp-lxgr19rx" class="KvoMHf has-custom-focus wixui-text-input__input" type="search" placeholder="Search..." aria-required="false" aria-invalid="false" maxlength="100"
              autocomplete="off" aria-label="Search..." value=""></div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div><button aria-label="Search..." class="lS0Z88 has-custom-focus" type="submit">
      <div class="TmqMif wixui-search-bar__icon"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="5 5 14 14">
          <path fill="currentColor" d="m15.683 14.6 3.265 3.265a.2.2 0 0 1 0 .282l-.8.801a.2.2 0 0 1-.283 0l-3.266-3.265a5.961 5.961 0 1 1 1.084-1.084zm-4.727 1.233a4.877 4.877 0 1 0 0-9.754 4.877 4.877 0 0 0 0 9.754z"></path>
        </svg></div>
    </button>
  </div><input class="shCc15" type="submit" tabindex="-1" aria-hidden="true" value="Search...">
</form>

Text Content

top of page
Skip to Main Content


 * THE LETTER

 * ABOUT

 * CONTACT

 * DOWNLOAD PDF

 * SUPPORT

 * More


Use tab to navigate through the menu items.
 * 
 * 



“THE HONEST INVESTIGATOR MUST BE PREPARED TO FOLLOW WHEREVER THE SEARCH OF TRUTH
MAY LEAD. TRUTH IS OFTEN FOUND IN THE MOST UNEXPECTED PLACES. HE MUST, WITH
FEARLESS AND OPEN MIND INSIST THAT FACTS ARE FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANY
CHERISHED, MISTAKEN BELIEFS, NO MATTER HOW UNPLEASANT THE FACTS OR HOW
DELIGHTFUL THE BELIEFS.”

HUGH B. BROWN – GENERAL CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 1962


THE LETTER





PART 1


PART 2


PART 3


PART 4

All events >




THE EARLY CHURCH


THE BOOK OF MORMON


THE BOOK OF ABRAHAM


THE MODERN CHURCH

PREFACE
11. DNA
17. THE ROSETTA STONE
23. TITHING
INTRODUCTION
12. REFORMED EGYPTIAN
1. THE FIRST VISION
13. ANACHRONISMS
2. THE TRANSLATION
14. THE JAREDITES
3. THE WITNESSES
15. SOURCE MATERIAL
4. THE KINDERHOOK PLATES
16. EXPERT VIEWS
18. FACSIMILE #1
24. CHURCH SPENDING
19. FACSIMILE #2
25. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
20. FACSIMILE #3
CONCLUSION
21. THE TRANSLATION
22. EXPERT VIEWS
5. THE WORD OF WISDOM
6. THE ENDOWMENT

Anchor 1
7. POLYGAMY
8. RACE AND THE CHURCH
9. BLOOD ATONEMENT
10. PROPHESIES

 

PREFACE



My Love,

 

I am writing this letter to explain in detail how I came to the conclusion that
the Church is not all it claims to be. I long for your understanding and
support. You are my whole world.



I have been known to get intellectually excited about various subjects on
occasion. I tend to investigate every piece of information and exhaust all
resources to satisfy my curiosity. One day I came across an Ensign article
discussing the new Joseph Smith Papers project that caused my curiosity to
extend into Church history. I soon became captivated. I began reading every
Church-approved historical resource I could find. I pored over Joseph Smith’s
journals, the Journal of Discourses, The History of the Church and early Mormon
periodicals. It was all so fascinating. My intent was to learn more about the
history and to strengthen my testimony, but every so often I would run across
well-known events that did not match the narrative I was taught growing up in
the Church. This letter is a collection of these events and other
inconsistencies.



I would like to address something before you continue reading. Much of this
information will be new to you, it was to me. It may feel uncomfortable learning
things we were never taught in church. We have been told that this feeling is
the Spirit warning us; but please consider that any information that seriously
challenges our worldview will make us feel this way. My only request is that you
read this with an open mind about the possibility that anything is possible in
this crazy world.

 

 

Introduction



Church Historian, Elder Steven E. Snow, was interviewed by BYU’s Religious
Educator program about the Church’s recent increasing openness with regard to
history. He stated,



“My view is that being open about our history solves a whole lot more problems
than it creates. We might not have all the answers, but if we are open – and we
now have pretty remarkable transparency – then I think in the long run that will
serve us well. I think in the past there was a tendency to keep a lot of the
records closed or at least not give access to information. But the world has
changed in the last generation—with the access to information on the Internet,
we can’t continue that pattern; I think we need to continue to be more open.”

Steven E. Snow – Start With Faith: A Conversation with
Elder Steven E.Snow, Religious Educator 14, no.3

 

 

What pattern can’t they continue? During an interview with BYU Professor of
History, D Michael Quinn, Elder Boyd K. Packer stated,



“I have a hard time with historians because they idolize the truth. The truth is
not uplifting; it destroys…Historians should tell only that part of the truth
that is inspiring and uplifting.”



Boyd K. Packer  – D. Michael Quinn, Pillars of  My  Faith,
Symposium, Salt Lake City, August 19, 1994


preface

intro



 

 

Elder Packer counsels that not all truth should be shared, but what determines
which should be shared and which should be censored? At what point do partial
truths become lies? Elder Packer’s caution and Elder Snow’s reveal shows that
the brethren have regularly suppressed information about the Church’s
troublesome history. Yet now they see the need to finally be truthful due to the
Internet’s free flow of information. I feel that a true church should not have a
troublesome past to hide and be open to full disclosure if there is any.



Let’s take a closer look at what Elder Snow says have been kept closed all these
years.










PART 1 


THE EARLY CHURCH

 

Chapter 1

The First Vision





 

 

President Gordon B. Hinckley rests the entire truthfulness of the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints on the validity of the First Vision when he
stated,



“Our whole strength rests on the validity of that [First] vision. It either
occurred or it did not occur. If it did not, then this work is a fraud. If it
did, then it is the most important and wonderful work under the heavens”



 Gordon B. Hinckley – The Marvelous Foundation of Our Faith,
General Conference, October 2002



When studying the circumstances surrounding the First Vision, issues arise that
are not taught to members of the Church. These issues involve the timeline,
common First Vision-like accounts, Joseph’s contradictory accounts, contemporary
statements, discrepancies with the official version, and continued concealment.



 

TIMELINE

Joseph Smith claimed to have experienced the First Vision in 1820, yet there
appears to be no record before 1832. The Church confirms this fact when it
states,



“The oldest account, written in 1832, was part of an autobiography. This account
emphasized Joseph’s quest for religious truth and his desire to be forgiven of
his sins. Therein, Joseph stated that the Lord said to him, “Joseph my son thy
sins are forgiven thee.”

LDS.org/topics/first-vision-accounts.



If this event occurred in 1820, then it was 12 years later when Joseph decided
to first make a record of it; 2 years after the organization of the Church.



No contemporary periodicals in the 1830s mention Joseph Smith, none of the
publications of the Church in that decade, and no journal or correspondence from
that time mention the story of the First Vision.









Ch. 1


Former Church Historian James B. Allen acknowledged that the story of the First
Vision was not known in the 1830s. Elder Allen stated that in the 1830s “the
general membership of the Church knew little, if anything, about it.” (Dialogue:
A Journal of Mormon Thought, Autumn 1966) According to the historical record,
there is no reference to the First Vision as we know it, in any published
material in the 1830s.



In 1830 the Church first published The Book of Commandments, a predecessor to
the Doctrine and Covenants. It was a collection of Joseph’s revelations that had
been appearing periodically in the Evening and Morning Star. Five years later
the Church decided to add to the Book of Commandments a series of lectures that
Joseph prepared for teaching in the School of the Prophets. Joseph’s Lectures on
Faith were known as the ‘Doctrine’, and his revelations as the ‘Covenants’, thus
the name of the book was changed to the Doctrine and Covenants. Outlined in
these lectures were the doctrine and theology of the Church up to that point,
yet they did not mention Joseph’s First Vision, even though he speaks
extensively on the nature of God. Nor do the pages of the Latter-day Saints
Messenger and Advocate, printed in Kirtland by Oliver Cowdery.



Part 1


The first missionary pamphlet of the Church was A Voice of Warning and
Instruction to All People, the first edition was published in 1837 by apostle
Parley P. Pratt. The book contains long sections on items important to
missionaries of the 1830’s, such as fulfillment of prophecy, the Book of Mormon,
the resurrection, and the nature of revelation, but again, nothing on the First
Vision.



The story of the First Vision was not printed in the 1830s. What would later
become the official account of the First Vision wasn’t printed until 1842. For
over 20 years there are no records of transcribed sermons by Joseph or the other
elders of the Church, no personal journal entries by any of Joseph Smith’s
family or followers, and no LDS periodicals describing this historic event as
we’ve come to know it. Before its first publication, none of the more than
16,000 members of the Church ever recorded hearing about it. From all this it
would appear that the general membership did not receive any information about
the First Vision until the 1840’s.

 

 

COMMON FIRST VISION-LIKE ACCOUNTS

Several religious publications in the New England area demonstrate that such
visions were common during the early Church.



1. Norris Stearns published his own vision in Greenfield, Massachusetts in 1815;
not far from where the Joseph Smith Senior family lived in Vermont.



“At length, as I lay apparently upon the brink of eternal woe, seeing nothing
but death before me, suddenly there came a sweet flow of the love of God to my
soul, which gradually increased. At the same time, there appeared a small gleam
of light in the room, above the brightness of the sun, then at his meridian,
which grew brighter and brighter… At length, being in an ecstasy of joy, I
turned to the other side of the bed, (whether in the body or out I cannot tell,
God knoweth) there I saw two spirits, which I knew at the first sight. But if I
had the tongue of an Angel I could not describe their glory, for they brought
the joys of heaven with them. One was God, my Maker, almost in bodily shape like
a man. His face was, as it were a flame of Fire, and his body, as it had been a
Pillar and a Cloud. In looking steadfastly to discern features,  could see none,
but a small glimpse would appear in some other place. Below him stood Jesus
Christ my Redeemer, in perfect shape like a man—His face was not ablaze, but had
the countenance of fire, being bright and shining. His Father’s will appeared to
be his! All was condescension, peace, and love!”

Norris Stearns –  The Religious Experience Of Norris Stearns, 1815

 

2. Minister Elias Smith published a book in which he told of his conversion in
1816.



“I went into the woods … a light appeared from heaven … My mind seemed to rise
in that light to the throne of God and the Lamb … The Lamb once slain appeared
to my understanding, and while viewing him, I felt such love to him as I never
felt to anything earthly … It is not possible for me to tell how long I remained
in that situation."

Elias Smith –  The Life, Conversion, Preaching,
Travels, and Sufferings of Elias Smith, 1816



3. Asa Wild claimed to have a revelation that was published on October 22, 1823.



“It seemed as if my mind … was struck motionless, as well as into nothing,
before the awful and glorious majesty of the Great Jehovah. He then spake … He
also told me, that every denomination of professing Christians had become
extremely corrupt”

Asa Wild – Wayne Sentinel,1823. https://ojs.lib.byu.edu
/spc/index.php/BYUStudies/article/viewFile/6482/6131

 

4. Billy Hibbard, a New York preacher, published his memoirs in 1825 and
included an experience with meeting Jesus and God the Father when was a young
boy.



“…when I came to the place of prayer, had kneeled down and closed my eyes, with
my hands uplifted toward the heavens, I saw Jesus Christ at the right hand of
God looking down upon me, and God the Father looking upon him. The look of Jesus
on me removed the burden of my sins, while he spoke these words, “Be faithful
unto death and this shall be thy place of rest.”

Billy Hibbard – Memoirs of the Life and Travels of B. Hibbard:
Minister of the Gospel, 1825

 

5. John S Thompson, a New York minister, published another similar account in
1826.



“I dreamed Christ descended from the firmament, in a glare of brightness,
exceeding tenfold the brilliancy of the meridian Sun, and he came to me saying,
‘I commission you to go and tell mankind that I am come; and bid every man to
shout victory.”

John S. Thompson – The Christian Guide to a Right
Understanding of the Sacred Scriptures, 1826

 

6. Solomon Chamberlin, an early member of the Church, published a pamphlet of
his experience before he met Joseph Smith.



“Dissatisfied with the religions he had tried, Chamberlain prayed for further
guidance, and in 1816, according to his account, “the Lord revealed to me in a
vision of the night an angel,” whom Chamberlain asked about the right way. The
angel told him that the churches were corrupt and that God would soon raise up
an apostolic church. Chamberlain printed up an account of his visions and was
still distributing them and looking for the apostolic church when he stopped in
Palmyra.”

John Taylor – Nauvoo Journal, Jan-Sept 1845, BYU Studies 23 no.3, p.45.
Referring
to A Sketch of the Experience of Solomon Chamberlin, Lyons, New York, 1829

 

It appears that when Joseph Smith initially wrote his First Vision experience in
1832, many people related stories of visionary experiences with Heavenly Father
and Jesus. Joseph’s story turns out to be quite a common claim in his day.







CONTRADICTORY ACCOUNTS OF THE FIRST VISION

Josephsmithpapers.org records 4 separate accounts of the First Vision by Joseph
between 1832-1842.



Earliest Account – Joseph Smith’s journal. Letterbook 1A, 27 November 1832.







In his first account, Joseph mentions that he had already concluded that  the
world had apostatized from the faith and that “there was no society or
denomination built upon the Gospel of Jesus Christ as recorded in the New
Testament.” He then has an encounter with “the Lord,” but makes no mention of
two separate personages. Joseph then writes that his sins are forgiven and the
Lord agrees with Joseph’s conclusion about the corruption of Christianity.

 

 

Second Account – Joseph’s 1835 account notes that while one of the two
personages testifies that Jesus is the Son of God, neither personage is
specifically identified as God or Jesus. Joseph writes that he also sees “many
angels.”







 

Third Account – 1838 (draft 2) account adopted as the official version.



 

Fourth Account –1842 account from the Wentworth Letter notes two beings; again
neither identified as God or Jesus.



WHICH ONE IS CORRECT?

Just after the turn of the century, the Church needed to decide on an official
account of the First Vision. It picked the version that was printed in the Times
and Seasons on March 15th, 1842. What is now found in The Pearl of Great Price
is the 2nd draft of an account written by James Mulholland, one of Joseph’s
scribes.

 

It was the first time any account identified the heavenly visitor(s), as
anything other than angels. Compared to the earliest mention of the First Vision
written by Joseph Smith himself, the official account written by Mulholland
shows some discrepancies. Joseph’s motivation to pray in the grove was
originally a desire for the forgiveness of his sins, not to know which churches
were true because Joseph had already come to the conclusion that all churches
were false. Also, the near-death experience of being overcome by an evil power
is only found in the James Mulholland version. And most importantly, Joseph
states, “I saw the Lord” vs. “I saw two Personages.”

 





  
          


 

 

 

 

 

 

The differences between both accounts are quite significant, especially in the
most important piece of information they are communicating. If they are both
supposed to be of the same event, then why would the official account say he
spoke to God and Jesus, while Joseph’s journal says he only saw the Lord? No
priesthood, relief society or Sunday school manual has ever mentioned that the
First Vision story found in the Pearl of Great Price differs significantly from
the one Joseph originally wrote.







CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTS

It appears that Joseph told the elders of the Church a very different experience
than any of his written accounts.



“The Lord did not come with the armies of heaven … but He did send his angel to
this same obscure person, Joseph Smith jun., who afterwards became a Prophet,
Seer, and Revelator, and informed him that he should not join any of the
religious sects of the day, for they were all wrong.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, 1855, p.171

 

“The same organization and Gospel that Christ died for … is again established in
this generation. How did it come? By the ministering of an holy angel from God,
out of heaven, who held converse with man, and revealed unto him the darkness
that enveloped the world … He told him the Gospel was not among men, and that
there was not a true organization of His kingdom in the world … Joseph was
strengthened by the Spirit and power of God, and was enabled to listen to the
teachings of the angel. . . The man to whom the angel appeared obeyed the
Gospel.”

Wilford Woodruff – Journal of Discourses, vol.2, 1855,pp.196-197

 

“He [Joseph Smith] went humbly before the Lord and inquired of Him, and the Lord
answered his prayer, and revealed to Joseph, by the ministration of angels, the
true condition of the religious world. When the holy angel appeared, Joseph
inquired which of all these denominations was right and which he should join,
and was told they were all wrong.”

George A. Smith – Journal of Discourses, 1863, vol.12, pp.334



“How was it, and which was right? None of them was right, just as it was when
the Prophet Joseph asked the angel which of the sects was right that he might
join it. The answer was that none of them are right. What, none of them? No. We
will not stop to argue that question; the angel merely told him to join none of
them that none of them were right.”

John Taylor – Journal of Discourses, vol.20, 1879, pp.158-171

 

All these statements reveal that as late as 35 years after Joseph’s death, and
59 years after his vision, the Church was still not teaching that Joseph saw two
personages but only an “angel.”







CONTINUED CONCEALMENT

Using the vast resources of the Church education system, members are not
informed of the inconsistencies relating to Joseph’s visions. It also appears
that average members are not the only ones surprised by this evidence. President
of the First Quorum of the Seventy, S. Dilworth Young, published a statement in
the Improvement Era on this subject.



“I cannot remember the time when I have not heard the story, concerning the
coming of the Father and the Son to the Prophet Joseph Smith. I am concerned
however with one item which has recently been called to my attention on this
matter. There appears to be going about our communities some writing to the
effect that the Prophet Joseph Smith evolved his doctrine from what might have
been a vision, in which he is supposed to have said that he saw an angel,
instead of the Father and the Son. According to this theory, by the time he was
inspired to write the occurrence in 1838, he had come to the conclusion that
there were two beings.



This rather shocked me. I can see no reason why the Prophet, with his brilliant
mind, would have failed to remember in sharp relief every detail of that
eventful day. I can remember quite vividly that in 1915 I had a mere dream, and
while the dream was prophetic in nature, it was not startling. It has been long
since fulfilled, but I can remember every detail of it as sharply and clearly as
though it had happened yesterday. How then could any man conceive that the
Prophet, receiving such a vision as he received, would not remember it and would
fail to write it clearly, distinctly, and accurately?”


S. Dilworth Young – Improvement Era, General Conference edition, June 1957

 

 

CONTEXT

Considering that First Vision-like accounts were common in New England, that it
took 60 years for leadership to become aware of the “two personages”, and the
active suppression of this information, it feels hard to be confident in the
truthfulness of the First Vision.





 

Chapter 2

The Translation

Summary from Joseph’s First Account

⋅ Already thought all churches were not true

⋅ Desired for mercy

⋅ Prayed

⋅ Saw a pillar of light

⋅ Saw the Lord

Summary from the Pearl of Great price

⋅ Desired to know which church was true

⋅ Prayed

⋅ Overcome by the power of Satan

⋅ Saw a pillar of light

⋅ Saw 2 personages


Ch. 2



The Church has taught that the translation process of the Book of Mormon looked
like this: Joseph Smith read the golden plates like a book, translating the text
out loud to Oliver Cowdery, who served as scribe. The context surrounding the
translation process raises issues that are not evident to members of the Church.
These issues involve the actual translation using a seer stone, Joseph’s use of
folk magic, and his trouble with the law regarding these circumstances.




THE ACTUAL METHOD

“Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat,
drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the
spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would
appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear,
and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off
the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was
written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it
would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear.
Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by
any power of man.”



David Whitmer – Address to All Believers In Christ, 1887
Also in Russell M. Nelson – A Treasured Testament Ensign, July 1993



Contrary to general Church teachings, Joseph did not read the gold plates like
an open book at all. Rather, during the translation process, he buried his face
in a hat that contained a common rock. The gold plates were either covered by a
cloth where no one, including Joseph, could see them or they were in a different
location altogether. The Church knew the true method, yet commissioned works of
art and film and uses the education system to teach otherwise.



“I frequently wrote day after day, often sitting at the table close by him, he
sitting with his face buried in his hat, with the stone in it, and dictating
hour after hour with nothing between us.”



Emma Smith – Last Testimony of Sister Emma,
Saints’ Herald 26, Oct. 1, 1879

 


 

Emma Smith and David Whitmer describe Joseph’s use of the seer stone and hat,
but this information had all but been buried. In December 2013 the Church
released an essay addressing the translation of the Book of Mormon issue.
Finally, after public criticisms, the seer stone is again mentioned for a new
generation of members.




 

“The other instrument, which Joseph Smith discovered in the ground years before
he retrieved the gold plates, was a small oval stone, or “seer stone.” As a
young man during  the 1820s, Joseph Smith, like others in his day, used a seer
stone to look for lost objects and buried treasure.”



Book of Mormon Translation, LDS.org/topics



On August 4th, 2015, LDS.org published an article titled, Joseph the Seer. It
contains the first ever, official image of one of Joseph Smith’s seer stones. It
is the very same stone Joseph found while digging a well on the property of
Willard Chase in 1822. For nearly 200 years the Church has had the stone in
their possession yet never actively taught about it; and in the case of former
president of the Church, Joseph Fielding Smith, has denied its role. (Doctrines
of Salvation Vol.3)




 


FOLK MAGIC

Could Joseph Smith’s experiences actually be products of his family’s practice
of local folk magic? BYU Studies Quarterly describes the Smith family culture
when it stated, “In frontier America, seer stones or ‘peep stones’ were commonly
used by lost object finders, people engaged in the widespread practice of lost
treasure digging.” (BYU Studies Quarterly, Vol.55, No.1, 2016)



Director of Center for Western Studies at BYU and president of the Mormon
History Association, Ronald W. Walker, put the Smith family’s activities in
historical context.



“From Colonial times to at least the age of Jackson [1776-1837] Americans dug
for magical treasure. There were hundreds and probably thousands of these
money-diggers all seeking troves of fabled coins, mines, jewels and other valued
prizes “The money-diggers placed faith in conjuring elemental spirits, thrice
spoken dreams, seeric gifts, and enchanted treasure.”

“Clearly the ideas of hidden but guarded treasure with their secondary and
accompanying motifs of ancient texts, animals, boxes, devils, caves, gold,
incantations, mountains and even the ratifying number three were an ancient
bequest.



“A treasure-finding device used by adepts was the “peep” or “seer” stone, whose
acclaimed gifts excelled even those of the divining rod. Such stones seemed to
be everywhere and were of every possible description. Joseph Smith’s various
stones reportedly included a smooth grey egg-shaped rock found in a neighbor’s
well, a second which he reportedly dug up near Lake Erie after espying it in his
neighbor’s stone and still others collected from the Mississippi River sands
near Nauvoo, Illinois.



“With most village seers requiring that the light be secluded this stone in the
hat procedure was standard by this method an adept could see within the stone
crystal a helpful spirit or the precise locality of the underground treasure.”
“While finding the right moment to dig was important, the need to circumvent the
treasure’s guardian was crucial. Like its Old World antecedents, the American
treasure keeper might be demonic or divine. Or it could be a cat, dog, snake or
some other protecting animal. But generally, the American treasure guardian was
a murdered youth or man whose body had been left with the buried valuables to
ensure their protection. Guardian Indians were a frequent motif while a murdered
pirate protected Captain Kidd’s troves.



“As Vermont’s early nineteenth-century emigration swept into upstate New York
the money digging frenzy came with it. Such superstition was frequent in the new
settlements. The Palmyra Reflector labeled the New York money hunting mania,
“Men and women without distinction of age or sex became marvelously wise in the
occult sciences, many dreamed and others saw visions disclosing to them, deep in
the bowels of the earth, rich and shining treasures.



“Rumors constantly swirled about hunters’ smiling fortunes, which excited still
others to further digging. Smith family reportedly found objects as a
cannonball, a cache of gold watches and according to the viewpoint of some of
their neighbors the golden plates which produced the book of Mormon. Indeed in
ways that are yet to be explored, money digging may have influenced two of the
nineteenth century’s major social and religious movements Mormonism and
Spiritualism. Its touch on American society was not light.”



Ronald W. Walker – The Persistent Idea of Treasure Hunting in America.
https://ojs.lib.byu.edu/spc/ index.php/BYUStudies/article/viewFile/5447/5097



“Like many other New Englanders, they were familiar with searches for lost
treasure by supernatural means. Joseph Smith’s father was reputed to be one of
these treasure seekers, and Joseph Smith himself had found a stone, called a
seer stone, which reportedly enabled him to find lost objects. Treasure-seekers
wanted to employ him to help with their searches. One, a man named Josiah
Stowell, hired Joseph and his father in 1825 to dig for a supposed Spanish
treasure near Harmony, Pennsylvania. The effort came to nothing, and the Smiths
returned home, but the neighbors continued to think of the Smiths as part of the
treasure-seeking company.”



Richard L. Bushman – Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Joseph Smith
www.eom.byu.edu/index.php/Smith,Joseph

 

“By 1825, [19 yrs old – 5 years after the First Vision] young Joseph had a
reputation in Manchester and Palmyra for his activities as a treasure seer, or
someone who used a seer stone to locate gold or other valuable objects buried in
the earth.”



Elder Steven E. Snow – Church Historian, Ensign, September 2015




 

Even Isaac Hale did not consent to Joseph and Emma’s marriage because he did not
have stable employment and had a reputation of looking into peep stones for
buried treasure. At one point Joseph visited Emma’s father in an attempt to
reconcile for marrying Emma anyway. Forgivingly, Isaac invited Joseph and Emma
to make their home in Harmony.




 

“I said with paternal concern and some compassion, that if Joseph would move to
Pennsylvania and give up his old practice of looking in the stone, I would
assist him in getting into business. Smith stated to me that he had given up
what he called ‘glass-looking’ and that he expected and was willing to work hard
for a living.”

Isaac Hale – History of the Church, vol.1, ch.2

 

The Smith family’s use of seer stones to find buried gold treasure was a common
folk magic practice in New England.






 


TROUBLE WITH THE LAW

Between 21-25 years old, Joseph Smith was arrested 4 separate times for fraud.
Josephsmithpapers.org displays a trial bill for Justice Albert Neely where
Josiah Stowell brought charges against Joseph for glass looking and was
convicted of a misdemeanor.



“Prisoner examined: says that he came from the town of Palmyra, and had been at
the house of Josiah Stowell in Bainbridge … That he had a certain stone which he
had occasionally look at to determine where hidden treasures in the bowels of
the earth were; that he professed to tell in this manner where gold mines were
at a distance under ground, and  had looked for Mr. Stowell several times, and
had informed him where he could find these treasures, and Mr. Stowell had been
engaged in digging for them.



Josiah Stowell sworn: says that prisoner had … pretended to have skill of
telling where hidden treasures in the earth were by means of looking through a
certain stone; that prisoner had looked for him sometimes; once to tell him
about money buried in Bend Mountain in Pennsylvania [and] once for gold on
Monument Hill.



Jonathon Thompson: says that prisoner was requested to look for chest of money;
did look, and pretended to know where it was … Smith looked in his hat while
there, and when very dark, and told how the chest was situated…That the last
time he looked he discovered distinctly the two Indians who buried the trunk,
that a quarrel ensued between them, and that one of said Indians was killed by
the other, and thrown into the hold beside the trunk, to guard it, as he
supposed. And therefore the Court find the Defendant guilty.”



Joseph Smith’s 1826 court transcript






CONTEXT

BYU Professor, Ronald Walker, states that the events surrounding Joseph and the
gold plates were very typical of early 19th-century folk magic practitioners.







If Joseph used a seer stone to defraud people while selling treasure-hunting
services, then used the same stone to write the Book of Mormon while selling
religious services, it speaks to the overall credibility of his claim.
Considering that Joseph did not even use the plates during the translation,
considering that folk magic was common in the New England area, and he had been
in trouble with the law for treasure hunting, it seems hard to feel confident in
the authenticity of the official translation story.









Chapter 3

The Witnesses




Ch. 3


Losing confidence in the truthfulness of Joseph’s claims made me think of the
witnesses to the plates and how their testimonies lend credibility to the entire
narrative; however, research turns up issues of their own. These included the
fact that no scribe ever saw the plates, the 3 and 8 witnesses only saw the
plates with their spiritual eyes, the printed testimony did not reflect literal
events, and nearly all the witnesses left the Church.



THE SCRIBES

During the translation process, Joseph was either behind a curtain or the plates
sat underneath a cloth in a box in another room. No scribe to the translation
process (Oliver Cowdery, Martin Harris or Emma Smith) was ever allowed to see
the plates. Emma only felt the plates through a cloth on the table. Why wouldn’t
Joseph want anybody to see the plates? (By the Gift and Power of God, Elder Neal
A. Maxwell January 1997 Ensign quoting David Whitmer  Interviews: A Restoration
Witness, ed. Lyndon W. Cook, [1991], p173) and (Joseph Smith III, “Last
Testimony of Sister Emma,” pp289–90).





THE 3 WITNESSES

The History of the Church records the event where Martin Harris, David Whitmer
and Oliver Cowdery became the first witnesses to the gold plates after Joseph
Smith. Joseph describes how the men gained their witness of the plates in a
purely visionary setting.





“Not many days after the above commandment was given, we four, viz., Martin
Harris, David Whitmer, Oliver Cowdery and myself, agreed to retire into the
woods, and try to obtain, by fervent and humble prayer, the fulfilment of the
promises given in the above revelation—that they should have a view of the
plates. We accordingly made choice of a piece of woods convenient to Mr.
Whitmer’s house, to which we retired, and having knelt down, we began to pray in
much faith to Almighty God to bestow upon us a realization of these promises.
According to previous arrangement, I commenced by vocal prayer to our Heavenly
Father, and was followed by each of the others in succession. We did not at the
first trial, however, obtain any answer or manifestation of divine favor in our
behalf. We again observed the same order of prayer, each calling on and praying
fervently to God in rotation, but with the same result as before. Upon this, our
second failure, Martin Harris proposed that he should withdraw himself from us,
believing, as he expressed himself, that his presence was the cause of our not
obtaining what we wished for. He accordingly withdrew from us, and we knelt down
again, and had not been many minutes engaged in prayer, when presently we beheld
a light above us in the air, of exceeding brightness; and behold, an angel stood
before us. In his hands he held the plates which we had been praying for these
to have a view of. He turned over the leaves one by one, so that we could see
them, and discern the engravings thereon distinctly. He then addressed himself
to David Whitmer, and said, ‘David, blessed is the Lord, and he that keeps His
commandments;’ when, immediately afterwards, we heard a voice from out of the
bright light above us, saying, ‘These plates have been revealed by the power of
God, and they have been translated by the power of God. The translation of them
which you have seen is correct, and I command you to bear record of what you now
see and hear.”



Joseph Smith – History of the Church, vol.1, pp.54–55



Joseph Smith, David Whitmer, and Oliver Cowdery saw an angel and the plates
after Martin Harris withdrew from the group. Joseph goes on to tell how he left
David and Oliver and went in pursuit of Martin Harris, whom he found at a
considerable distance fervently  engaged in prayer. Then they both joined in
prayer, and according to Joseph, “the same vision was opened to our view.”
Remember, the word “vision” means dream not reality. It is important to note
that Joseph never claimed to have carried the plates into the woods where they
prayed. Praying to see the plates in the woods seems rather odd if Joseph
actually possessed physical plates. Why was prayer necessary to see the plates
if they were in fact, a physical object? Martin Harris’ behavior also seems
strange if the plates actually existed.





THE TESTIMONY OF THE 3 WITNESSES IS NOT ACCURATE

Printed in the Book of Mormon is the Testimony of the Three Witnesses. It is not
an accurate account of the events, but a reconstruction of multiple experiences.



“And we also testify that we have seen the engravings which are upon the plates…
And we declare with words of soberness, that an angel of God came down from
heaven, and he brought and laid before our eyes, that we beheld and saw the
plates, and the engravings thereon; and we know that it is by the grace of God
the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, that we beheld and bear record that these
things are true.”

Testimony of the Three Witnesses, The Book of Mormon

 

The language in this statement makes it seem as if all four men experienced this
event together. However, the History of the Church passage clearly shows that
the Martin Harris’ vision happened separately. Not only that, but later
statements made by David Whitmer and Martin Harris show that the angel brought
additional objects for them to see. This is curiously left out of the signed
Testimony of the Three Witnesses.



“We not only saw the plates of the Book of Mormon but also the brass plates, the
plates of the Book of Ether, the plates containing the records of the wickedness
and secret combinations of the people of the world down to the time of their
being engraved, and many other plates … there appeared as it were, a table with
many records or plates upon it, besides the plates of the Book of Mormon, also
the Sword of Laban, the Directors i.e., the ball which Lehi had-and the
Interpreters [Urim and Thummim].”

David Whitmer – interview by Orson Pratt, Book of Mormon Compendium, 1878,
pp.55-56



Why fail to mention the other plates and important Nephite artifacts?





THE 8 WITNESSES

On March 25, 1838, Martin Harris testified in public that none of the 3 or 8
witnesses saw or handled the physical plates. This statement caused apostles
Luke S. Johnson, Lyman E. Johnson, John F. Boynton, high priest Stephen Burnett
and LDS Seventy Warren Parish to leave the church. A letter on
Josephsmithpapers.org dated April 15, 1838, Stephen Burnett wrote the following
to Lyman Johnson:



“I have reflected long and deliberately upon the history of this church and
weighed the evidence for and against it — loth to give it up — but when I came
to hear Martin Harris state in public that he never saw the plates with his
natural eyes only in vision or imagination, neither Oliver [Cowdery] nor David
[Whitmer] and also that the eight witnesses never saw them and hesitated to sign
that instrument for that reason, but were persuaded to do it, the last pedestal
gave way, in my view our foundations was sapped and the entire superstructure
fell a heap of ruins, … I was followed by W. [Warren] Parish, Luke Johnson and
John Boynton, all of who concurred with me. After we were done speaking,
M[artin] Harris arose and said he was sorry for any man who rejected the Book of
Mormon for he knew it was true, he said he had hefted the plates repeatedly in a
box with only a tablecloth or handkerchief over them, but he never saw them only
as he saw a city through a mountain. And said that he never should have told
that the testimony of the eight was false, if it had not been picked out of air
but should have let it passed as it was.”

Stephen Burnett – Letter Stephen Burnett to Johnson, April 15 1838
http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/letterbook-2?p=69



On April 5, 1839 member of the Church, Theodore Turley, challenged John Whitmer,
one of the 8 witnesses, to either affirm or deny his testimony regarding the
gold plates. Whitmer responded by saying,



“I now say, I handled those plates … they were shown to me by a supernatural
power”

John Whitmer – History of the Church, vol.3 p307


 

Why would a supernatural power be necessary if the plates actually existed?
Couldn’t Joseph just invite the men he wanted to be witnesses over to his house,
take the plates out of the box where he kept them and pass them around? Why are
visions and supernatural means necessary to see these plates?

 

Published on Josephsmithpapers.org are the signed statements by the 3 and 8
witnesses.






JosephSmithPapers reveals that both statements and all signatures are in the
handwriting of Oliver Cowdery. The official statements printed in the Book of
Mormon are not signed with original signatures, dated or given a specific
location where the events occurred. These are not 11 legally sworn statements;
rather they are accounts pre-written, pre-signed and agreed upon at some later
time, especially when considering that not a single witness ever saw the plates.




WHERE ARE THE PLATES NOW?

After completing the Book of Mormon Joseph had no more use of the plates and he
gave up possession of them. Wilford Woodruff records,



“President Young said in relation to Joseph Smith returning the plates of the
Book of Mormon, that he did not return them to the box from where he had
received them. But he went into a cave in the Hill Cumorah with Oliver Cowdery
and deposited those plates upon a table.”

Wilford Woodruff – Leaves From My Journal, December 11, 1869



In an interview, David Whitmer recalls:



Interviewer – Where are the plates now?
Whitmer – In a cave, where the angel has hidden them up till the time arrives
when the plates, which are sealed, shall be translated. God will yet raise up a
mighty one, who shall do his work till it is finished and Jesus comes again.
Interviewer – Where is that cave?
Whitmer – In the State of New York.”

David Whitmer – Deseret Evening News, August 16, 1878





According to Wilford Woodruff and David Whitmer, it seems as though they are
still here on the Earth in a cave in the Hill Cumorah. Surely the Church must be
in possession of the plates as there is a visitor’s center at the Hill Cumorah.








 


THE SUCCESSION CRISIS

For roughly three years after Joseph and Hyrum Smith’s deaths, several people
competed to assume the role as prophet and leader of the Church. Claiming to be
the new rightful successor were: Sidney Rigdon, Brigham Young, James Strang,
Samuel Smith, William Smith, Joseph Smith III and others.

 

Sidney Rigdon – First counselor in the First Presidency to Joseph Smith, argued
that by virtue of revelation from the Prophet himself, he should be rightful
heir to Joseph’s position.

 

Doctrine and Covenants 20:6
And again, verily I say unto thy brethren, Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G.
Williams, their sins are forgiven them also, and they are accounted as equal
with thee in holding the keys of this last kingdom

 

James Strang – Asserted that, unlike the others, he had physical proof of his
prophetic calling. He produced a 3-page letter, supposedly written by Joseph
Smith, naming Strang as successor. While the wording of the letter is somewhat
ambiguous and the handwriting does not match Joseph’s, it still convinced many
members of the Church to follow Strang.



Brigham Young – Fighting between individual competitors lasted 3 years until the
most senior member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, Brigham Young, was
voted “President of the whole Church of Latter Day Saints” by the remaining
members of the Twelve.



Joseph Smith lll – While Joseph Smith and five others were imprisoned at Liberty
Jail in Missouri, his young son, Joseph lll, was brought to visit on several
occasions. Imprisoned with Joseph was apostle Lyman Wight. Lyman did not agree
with Brigham’s new position as leader of the Church because he witnessed Joseph
Smith ordain his oldest son, Joseph lll, to be his successor.



“Joseph called on me shortly after we came out of [Liberty] jail to lay hands
with him on the head of a youth and heard him cry aloud, ‘You are my successor
when I depart,’ and heard the blessings poured on his head.” (Who was the youth
Lyman referred to?) “The fifties assembled should have called on all the
authorities of the church down to the lay members from all the face of the
earth, and then have called on young Joseph, and held him up before the
congregation of Israel to take his father’s place in the flesh!”

Lyman Wight – Gospel Herald, Voree, WI, August 31, 1848
Saints Advocate, Vol.7, September 1884

None of the 3 scribes of the Book of Mormon, Emma Smith, Sidney Rigdon and
Oliver Cowdery, wanted to be affiliated with the new Brigham Young-led Church.
None of the 3 Witnesses wanted to be part of Brigham’s Church and none of the 8
Witnesses did either. While Samuel Smith and Joseph Sr. did not end up leaving
the Church like the rest, it is important to note that the Church was
financially supporting them at the time. Once Brigham took over as president,
not a single surviving scribe or member of the 3 and 8 witnesses decided to stay
with the Church anymore. 





CONTEXT

1. No scribe was allowed to see the plates.

2. Witnesses that did say they saw the plates said they did so spiritually, not
physically.

3. Signatures of the witnesses are the handwriting of Oliver Cowdery.

4. All witnesses to the plates ended up leaving the Church, save 2 members of
the Smith family.



How much credibility can we give the testimonies of those that have claimed to
see the plates when the records show that it was seen in visions, not physically
as the Church teaches? How much trust can we put in the statements of these
witnesses when all of them that weren’t being financially supported by the
Church ended up leaving?


 


 


 


CHAPTER 4


THE KINDERHOOK PLATES






Ch. 4


The Kinderhook Plates are six brass plates engraved by men from Illinois for the
purpose of exposing Joseph Smith as someone who could not divinely translate
ancient writings. This chapter covers the background, Joseph’s translation, the
forgery claim, the 1953 test results, and the 1980 test results.





BACKGROUND

“On April 23, 1843, a group of men excavated an old earth mound just outside the
town of Kinderhook, Illinois, and came up with a most interesting find. The
excavation was headed by Robert Wiley, a local merchant. After digging down
about twelve feet, they came upon “fire burned rock, charcoal, ashes, and badly
decomposed human bones. Near the [corner] a bundle was found that consisted of
six plates of brass of a bell shape, each having a hole near the small end, a
ring through them all and clasped with two clasps. The plates appeared to have
some kind of writing on them but were so badly oxidized they could not be
clearly distinguished until Dr. W. P.
Harris, MD, treated them with a dilute solution of sulphuric acid which made
them perfectly clear. They were completely covered with “hieroglyphics” on both
sides. A certificate stating the facts of the find was drawn up and signed by
nine of the men present and sent to nearby newspapers.”

Welby W. Ricks – The Kinderhook Plates,
The Improvement Era, September 19, 1962




 


TRANSLATION




“I insert facsimiles of the six brass plates found near Kinderhook, in Pike
county, Illinois, on April 23, by Mr. Robert Wiley and others, while excavating
a large mound. They found a skeleton about six feet from the surface of the
earth, which must have stood nine feet high. The plates were found on the breast
of the skeleton and were covered on both sides with ancient characters. I have
translated a portion of them, and find they contain the history of the person
with whom they were found. He was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of
Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the Ruler of
heaven and earth.”

Joseph Smith – History of the Church, May 1, 1843, vol.5 , p.372



Joseph claimed to translate a portion of the plates. He stated that the body
they were found with was descended from Ham.


Brigham Young was also with Joseph at the time he was studying the plates. He
made a tracing of one of the kinderhoook plates in his notebook. Inside the
drawing he wrote:
 

“May 3, 1843. I took this[sketch] at Joseph Smith’s house. Found near Quincy.”

Brigham Young – Brigham Young papers, Joseph Fielding
Smith Institute of Church History, BYU.


 


 


THE FORGERY CLAIM

In a letter, Wilbur Fugate, one of the men present during the excavation,
claimed to have helped craft the plates.



“I received your letter in regard to those plates, and will say in answer that
they are a humbug, gotten up by Robert Wiley, Bridge Whitton and myself…None of
the nine persons who signed the certificate knew the secret, except, Wiley and
I. We read in Pratt’s prophecy that “Truth is yet to spring up out of the
earth.” We concluded to prove the prophecy by way of a joke. We soon made our
plans and executed them, Bridge Whitton cut them out of some pieces of copper;
Wiley and I made the hieroglyphics by making impressions on beeswax and filling
them with acid and putting it on the plates. When they were finished we put them
together with rust made of nitric acid, old iron and lead, and bound them with a
piece of hoop iron, covering them completely with the rust.



Our plans worked admirably. A certain Sunday was appointed for digging. The
night before, Wiley went to the Mound where he had previously dug to the depth
of about eight feet, there




being a flat rock that sounded hollow beneath, and put them under it. On the
following morning quite a number of citizens were there to assist in the search,
there being two Mormon elders present (Marsh and Sharp). The rock was soon
removed, but some time elapsed before the plates were discovered. I finally
picked them up and exclaimed, “A piece of pot metal!” Fayette Grubb snatched
them from me and struck them against the rock and they fell to pieces. Dr.
Harris examined them and said they had hieroglyphics on them. He took acid and
removed the rust and they were soon out on exhibition.”

Wilbur Fugate Letter of Wilbur Fugate to James T. Cobb,
8 April 1878,Wisconsin Historical Society,Madison, WI



Faithful LDS members disregarded Fulgate’s story and held to Joseph’s
translation of the plates and maintained that the plates were in fact ancient
artifacts.




1953 TEST RESULTS

Addressing the forgery claim of Wilbur Fugate, the Church used two professional
engravers to examine the Kinderhook plates. The Improvement Era article goes on
to state:



“Mr. Fugate said Wiley and he had etched the plates. Yet two professional
engraves were invited to view the plates in 1953 and give their unbiased opinion
about them – which they did freely and without charge. They stated clearly that
the plate was engraved with a pointed instrument.” “The plates are now back in
their original category of genuine. What scholars may learn from this ancient
record in future years or what may be translated by divine power is an exciting
thought to contemplate. This much remains. Joseph Smith, Jun., stands as a true
prophet and translator of ancient records by divine means and all the world is
invited to investigate the truth which has sprung out of the earth not only of
the Kinderhook plates, but of the Book of Mormon as well.”

Welby W. Ricks – The Kinderhook Plates, The Improvement Era, September 19, 1962

 

The assessment was that the plates were authentic and Joseph was a true prophet.
As late as the printing of this 1962 article, every prophet from Joseph Smith to
David O. McKay believed the plates to be authentic.


 


1980 TEST RESULTS

In 1980 BYU professor Stanley B. Kimball was able to secure permission to
perform more scientific testing on the plates. In the August 1981 Ensign, the
Church published an article detailing the testing processes, results and
conclusion,which reverses its earlier position.



“These tests, involving some very sophisticated analytical techniques, were
performed by Professor D. Lynn Johnson of the Department of Materials Science
and Engineering at Northwestern University. Dr. Johnson used a scanning electron
microscope (SEM) to examine the grooves that form the characters on the plate to
determine whether they were cut or scratched with a tool or whether they were
etched with acid. A scanning Auger microprobe (SAM) was used to detect any
nitrogen residues that might have been left in the grooves as a result of
etching with nitric acid.
The irregular, grainy texture characteristic of acid etching is evident, not a
striated surface that would have been produced by an engraving tool. A thorough
SEM examination of the characters on the plate brought Dr. Johnson to the
conclusion that the characters on the plate were indeed prepared by acid
etching, not by any form of tooling, scratching, or cutting.

It became apparent during the SEM study that a residue of some kind was present
in some of the grooves. The scanning Auger microprobe (SAM) was used to analyze
these residues. A clear indication of nitrogen was detected, which would be
consistent with a copper nitrate residue and could indicate that nitric acid was
used in the etching, as those who reportedly originated the deception had
claimed.



“A recent electronic and chemical analysis of a metal plate (one of six original
plates) brought in 1843 to the Prophet Joseph Smith in Nauvoo, Illinois, appears
to solve a previously unanswered question in Church history, helping to further
evidence that the plate is what its producers later said it was—a
nineteenth-century attempt to lure Joseph Smith into making a translation of
ancient-looking characters that had been etched into the plates."



Stanley P. Kimball – Kinderhook Plates Brought to Joseph Smith
Appear to be a Nineteenth-Century Hoax, Ensign, 1981


 


 


CONTEXT




 1. Fake ancient plates were fashioned out of copper and iron. Using acid, they
    etched counterfeit hieroglyphics.

 2. The plates were taken to Joseph Smith where he pronounced them genuine and
    translated the “ancient characters.”

 3. The entire body of the Church believed in the authenticity of the plates.

 4. Wilbur Fugate claimed he, Wiley and Whitton made the plates as a joke.

 5. A 1953 observation claims the plates are genuine; reinforcing the Church’s
    position.

 6. After further scientific testing, it was concluded that the Kinderhook
    Plates were absolutely not genuine.
     

The fraudulent Kinderhook plates raise several troubling concerns. How could the
prophet Joseph Smith believe they were authentic and claim to have translated
the symbols as an account of a descendant of Ham through the loins of Pharaoh,
King of Egypt? This also puts into question Joseph’s translations of the Book of
Mormon and Book of Abraham characters.




 





CHAPTER 5


THE WORD OF WISDOM


Ch. 5



In studying all aspects of early Church history, I often thought about the Word
of Wisdom and how much the revelation means in verifying Joseph Smith’s
prophetic abilities. However, the more I researched the historical context of
Word of Wisdom the more I learned that it was not unique in its instructions for
health during that period. In fact, conventional ideas, movements, and
additional influences likely shaped what we have come to know as “the Lord’s law
of health.”





THE WORD OF WISDOM

The Word of Wisdom was written by Joseph Smith in Kirtland, Ohio on February 27,
1833.



Doctrine and Covenants 89.
2.To be sent greeting; not by commandment or constraint
5. That inasmuch as any man drinketh wine or strong drink among you, behold it
is not good, neither meet in the sight of your
Father, only in assembling yourselves together to offer up your sacraments
before him.
6. And, behold, this should be wine, yea, pure wine of the grape of the vine, of
your own make.
7. And, again, strong drinks are not for the belly, but for the washing of your
bodies.
9. And again, hot drinks are not for the body or belly.
11. Every herb in the season thereof, and every fruit in the season thereof; all
these to be used with prudence and thanksgiving.
12. Yea, flesh also of beasts and of the fowls of the air, I, the Lord, have
ordained for the use of man with thanksgiving;
nevertheless they are to be used sparingly;
13. And it is pleasing unto me that they should not be used, only in times of
winter, or of cold, or famine.
17. wheat for man, and corn for the ox, and oats for the horse, and rye for the
fowls and for swine, and for all beasts of the
field, and barley for all useful animals, and for mild drinks, as also other
grain.



There are several things mentioned in The Word of Wisdom that aren’t commonly
observed in modern LDS culture.

 

Verse 2 – Clearly states that the Word of Wisdom is not a commandment; yet
modern members are asked if they follow it during temple interviews and will not
be issued a temple recommend if the interviewer feels that they do not properly
adhere.



Verse 6,7,9,17 – Makes the distinction between 4 different types of drinks:
wine, strong, hot and mild. Wine = ok for the sacrament if you make it yourself.
Strong drinks = not ok. Hot drinks = not ok. Mild drinks = ok.



Verse 9 – Mentions “hot drinks.” What exactly does “hot drinks” refer to?
Apostle George Q. Cannon stated,



“We are told, and very plainly too, that hot drinks – tea, coffee, chocolate,
cocoa and all drinks of this kind are not good for man.… We must not permit them
to drink liquor or hot drinks, or hot soups or to use tobacco or other articles
that are injurious.”

George Q. Cannon – General Conference, April 7,
1868, Journal of Discourses, vol.12



Verse 11 – Only eat produce in their proper season.



Verse 12,13 – Meat should only be eaten in the winter or during a famine.

 

Verse 17 – Mild drinks made from barley are ok. What drinks are made from
barley? Beer.

 

It seems that the modern Church has settled on coffee, tea, alcohol, tobacco and
illegal drugs as the new interpretation. But according to the text of the Word
of Wisdom, members should refrain from hot drinks of all kinds, chocolate and
soups included. Alcohol is not outright banned, but only strong drinks (hard
liquor). In addition, according to the Word of Wisdom, all members should be
vegetarian most of the year. These parts have been reinterpreted to change the
original intent. Additionally, the Lord’s Law of Health seems to lack real
health considerations. Currently, extremely obese members are given temple
recommends, while active, healthy, and fit members who drink coffee and tea
would not qualify. It seems that if God really wanted to give the saints a code
of health that would have prevented pioneer deaths due to a long list of
illnesses including scarlet fever, typhoid fever, tuberculosis, influenza,
pneumonia, cholera, malaria and small pox, he would have added things like the
need for sanitizing water  by boiling, increased personal hygiene and
quarantining of sick persons.

 

In fact, the Church has long taught that coffee and tea were unhealthy; however,
this reputation appears to be mistaken. Studies involving over 1.5 million
participants who consumed 3-5 cups of coffee a day were at the lowest risk for
cardiovascular diseases, stroke, prostate, breast and lung cancers, compared
with those who drank none. Similar research show that polyphenol, a powerful
antioxidant found in black, green and white teas, combat free-radicals that
contribute to cancer, heart disease, kidney damage, diabetes, and helps lower
cholesterol.
(http://www.webmd.com/diet/features/tea-types-and-their-healthbenefits#1) and
(http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/12/upshot/more-consensus-on-coffees-benefits-than-you-might-think.html)





POSSIBLE INFLUENCES

Popular Misconceptions Regarding “Hot Drinks”

 









One common misconceptions in this era said that hot liquids were not good for
the body. A popular book titled, Wholesome Advice against the Abuse of Hot
Liquors, particularly targeted tea, coffee and hot chocolate labeling them as
unhealthy. This book argued that an excess consumption of hot drinks caused the
blood and insides to heat up and that “Excess of heat is the most common cause
of sickness and death.” Medical science at the time was so basic that the
evidence presented in the book was based largely upon crude anatomical knowledge
and references to classical Greek and Roman texts. A few decades later, John
Wesley, the founder of Methodism, was arguing for complete abstinence from tea,
on the grounds that it gave rise to “numberless disorders, particularly those of
a nervous kind”. He placed emphasis on the religious importance of self-denial.
(http://www.tea.co.uk/a-social-history#temperance) Interestingly, Joseph Smith
became very familiar with Methodist teachings when in June 1828 he became a
member of minister Nathanial Lewis’ Harmony, Pennsylvania congregation. It is
important to note that Joseph became a member after the First Vision where he
was told that all religions were incorrect.

The Temperance Movement

 

Alcohol had been socially acceptable during the colonial era, but a social shift
in the early 19th century initiated the belief that drinking was no longer
acceptable. The temperance movement was an organized effort to encourage
moderation in the consumption of alcohol or press for complete abstinence. The
American Temperance Society  was founded in 1826 and it benefited from a renewed
interest in religion and morality in America. The movement began to grow
exponentially. Within 12 years it claimed more than 8,000 local groups and over
1.5 million members. By 1839, 18 temperance journals were being published. Some
groups took positions on moral issues and advocated temperance with alcohol
rather than abstinence. The movement split along two 



lines: moderates who allowed some drinking and relied on moral persuasion alone,
and radicals who demanded prohibition laws to restrict or ban
alcohol.Prohibitionists dominated many of the largest temperance organizations
after the 1830’s, and temperance eventually became synonymous with prohibition.



“On October 6, 1830, the Kirtland Temperance Society was organized with two
hundred thirty nine members…. This society at Kirtland was a most active one….
it revolutionized the social customs of the neighborhood. The Temperance Society
succeeded in eliminating a distillery in Kirtland on February 1, 1833, just
twentyseven days before the Latter-day Saint revelation counseling abstinence
was announced, and that the distillery at Mentor, near Kirtland, was also closed
at the same time.”

Brigham Young University Studies, Winter 1959, pp.39-40

Emma Smith



Joseph Smith started a training school called the School of the Prophets for the
elders of the Church, which opened in Kirtland on the second floor of the Newel
K. Whitney mercantile store in January 1833. Brigham Young stated that the Word
of Wisdom was given in response to problems encountered while conducting those
meetings:

“I think I am as well acquainted with the circumstances which led to the giving
of the Word of Wisdom…When they assembled together in this room after breakfast,
the first thing they did was to light their pipes, and, while smoking, talk
about the great things of the kingdom, and spit all over the room, and as soon
as the pipe was out of their mouths a large chew of tobacco would then be taken.
Often when the Prophet [Joseph Smith] entered the room to give the school
instructions he would find himself in a cloud of tobacco smoke. This, and the
complaints of his wife at having to clean so filthy a floor, made the Prophet
think upon the matter, and he inquired of the Lord relating to the conduct of
the Elders in using tobacco, and the revelation known as the Word of Wisdom was
the result of his inquiry.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol.12, p.158




DISREGARDING THE WORD OF WISDOM

The History of the Church records that Joseph taught the Word of Wisdom but did
not practice it. If the Lord really gave this revelation to Joseph, one would
think he would at least follow it himself.

 

“We then partook of some refreshments, and our hearts were made glad with the
fruit of the vine. This is according to the pattern set by our Savior Himself,
and we feel disposed to patronize all the institutions of heaven.”

Joseph Smith – History of the Church, January 14, 1836, vol.2, p.369

 

“Called at the office and drank a glass of wine with Sister Jenetta Richards,
made by her mother in England, and reviewed a portion of the conference
minutes.”

Joseph Smith – History of the Church, May 3 1843, vol.5, p.380

 

“Ordinance on the Personal Sale of Liquors – Section 1. Be it ordained by the
City Council of Nauvoo, that the Mayor of the city be and is hereby authorized
to see or give spirits of any quantity as he in his wisdom shall judge to be for
the health and comfort, or convenience of such travelers or other persons as
shall visit his house from time to time. Passed December 12, 1843. Joseph Smith,
Mayor.”

Joseph Smith – History of the Church, December 12, 1843, vol.6, p.111

 

“Before the jailor came in, his boy brought in some water, and said the guard
wanted some wine. Joseph gave Dr. Richards two dollars to give the guard; but
the guard said one was enough, and would take no more. The guard immediately
sent for a bottle of wine, pipes, and two small papers of tobacco; and one of
the guards brought them into the jail soon after the jailor went out. Dr.
Richards uncorked the bottle, and presented a glass to Joseph, who tasted, as
also Brother Taylor and the doctor, and the bottle was then given to the guard,
who turned to go out.”

History of the Church, June 27, 1844, vol.6, p.616








CONTEXT

1826 – American Temperance Society founded.

1828 – Joseph Smith becomes a member of the Methodist church that discouraged
hot drinks.

1830 – Kirtland Temperance Society founded.

1833 – (Jan.) Joseph Smith hears complaints from Emma about tobacco.

1833 – (Feb. 1) The Kirtland Temperance Society eliminates the distillery in
Kirtland.

1833 – (Feb. 27) Joseph writes the Word of Wisdom limiting hot drinks, tobacco
and strong drinks.



I have never been taught in Church that abstinence from alcohol and other hot
drinks were already popular concepts of time leading up to the revelation. It
appears that the Word of Wisdom may not be unique instruction, but well within
the context of 19th century assumptions. Perhaps it was spurred by Emma’s
complaints, added to by Methodist teachings and pressured by the local Kirtland
Temperance Society.


Ch. 6


CHAPTER 6
THE ENDOWMENT



Was the temple endowment really a revelation from God or could it have another
origin? This chapter covers the origin of Freemasonry, founders of the Church
and their Masonic membership, and similarities between Masonic temple ceremonies
and the LDS temple endowment.




ORIGIN OF FREEMASONRY

“The earliest Masonic texts each contain some sort of a history of the craft, or
mystery, of masonry. The oldest known work of this type, The Halliwell
Manuscript, dating from between 1390 and 1425.”



Grand Lodge of British Columbia – The Halliwell Manuscript.







“Some are also told that King Solomon ruled over Masonic lodges as grand master.
The stories they weave around the building of the temple are obviously not
literal or historical facts but a dramatic means of explaining the principles of
Freemasonry. Freemasonry neither originated nor existed in Solomon’s time. The
general agreement amongst serious Masonic historians and researchers is that
Freemasonry has arisen, either directly or indirectly, from the medieval
stonemasons who built great cathedrals and castles. Those who favor the direct
descent from operative masonry say there were three stages to the evolution of
Freemasonry. The stonemasons gathered in huts (lodges) to rest and eat. These
lodges gradually became not the hut but the grouping together of stonemasons to
regulate their craft. In time, and in common with other trades, they developed
primitive initiation ceremonies for new apprentices.”



“As stonemasons could easily travel all over the country from one building site
to another, and as there were also no trade union cards or certificates of
apprenticeship they began to adopt a private word which a traveling stonemason
could use when he arrived at a new site, to prove that he was properly trained
and had been a member of a lodge. It was, after all, easier to communicate a
special word to prove that you knew what you were doing and were entitled to the
wages it deserved that to spend hours carving a block of stone to demonstrate
your skills.”



“We know that in the early 1600s these operative lodges began to admit men who
had no connection with the trade – accepted or gentlemen masons. Why this was
done and what form of ceremony was used is not known. As the 1600s drew to a
close more and more gentlemen began to join the lodges, gradually taking them
over and turning them into lodges of free and accepted or speculative masons, no
longer having any connection with the stonemasons’ craft. This is based on
evidence from Scotland. In England, the first evidence of a lodge completely
made up of non-operative masons is found. English evidence through the 1600s
points to Freemasonry existing apart from any actual or supposed organization of
operative stonemasons. This was a period of great religious and political
turmoil and intolerance. Men were unable to meet together without differences of
political and religious opinion leading to arguments. Opposing views split
families and the English civil war of 1642-6 was the ultimate outcome. As their
central idea was one of building a better society they borrowed their forms and
symbols from the operative builders craft and took their central allegory from
the Bible, the common source book known to all, in which the only building
described in any detail is King Solomon’ s Temple.



Stonemasons tools also provided them with a multiplicity of emblems to
illustrate the principles they were putting forward. The formation of the
premier Grand Lodge in 1717 had been followed, around 1725, by the Grand Lodge
of Ireland and, in 1736; the Grand Lodge of Scotland. These three Grand Lodges
did much to spread Freemasonry throughout the world, to the extent that all
regular Grand Lodges throughout the world, whatever the immediate means of their
formation, ultimately trace their origins back to one, or a combination, of the
Grand Lodges within the British Isles.”

Mastermason.com/jjcrowder/ history/history.html

Church leaders claim that the connection between Masons and Mormons date back to
the stonemasons who built Solomon’s temple in the Old Testament.



“Modern Masonry is a fragmentary presentation of the ancient order established
by King Solomon. From whom it is said to have been handed down through the
centuries. that he was not sorry there was such a similarity, because of the
fact that the ordinances and rites revealed to Joseph Smith constituted a
reintroduction upon the earth of the divine plan inaugurated in the Temple of
Solomon in ancient days. Masonry is an apostasy from the ancient early order,
just as so-called Christianity is an apostasy from the true Church of Christ”



Elder Melvin J. Ballard – The Salt Lake Herald, December 29, 1919

 

“We have the true Masonry. The Masonry of today is received from the apostasy
which took place in the days of Solomon, and David. They have now and then a
thing that is correct, but we have the real thing.”



Heber C. Kimball – Heber C. Kimball and Family, The Nauvoo Years.
Brigham Young University Studies. 1975, p.458



Freemason historians cite its origins to the late 14th to the early 15th century
in Scotland as a trade guild, not 950 BC in Jerusalem. President Kimball and
Elder Ballard appear to be mistaken about the origins of masonry and thus the
Church’s historical connection for the endowment ceremony.


 


LDS MASONS

As soon as the saints erected the Nauvoo Lodge, Joseph Smith also sought
membership in the fraternity because members of this family and several of the
first members of the Church were Masons. Joseph Smith Sr. was a documented
member in upstate New York. He was raised to the degree of Master Mason May 7,
1818, in Ontario Lodge No. 23 of Canandaigua, New York. His older brother Hyrum
was a member of Mount Moriah Lodge No. 112 at Palmyra, New York.



Other prominent members include: Joseph’s other brothers Samuel and William
Smith, subsequent presidents of the Church: Brigham Young, John Taylor, Wilford
Woodruff and Lorenzo Snow, members of First Presidencies: Sidney Rigdon, William
Law, John C. Bennett and Heber C. Kimball, apostles: Orson Pratt, Parley P.
Pratt, Orson Hyde and Lyman Johnson, Joseph’s secretary: William Clayton,
presiding bishop: Newell K. Whitney, Joseph’s bodyguard: Porter Rockwell, and
many more.



“15 March 1842 Tuesday – I officiated as grand chaplain at the installation of
the Nauvoo Lodge of Free Masons, at the Grove near the Temple. Grand Master
Jonas, of Columbus, being present, a large number of people assembled on the
occasion. The day was exceedingly fine; all things were done in order, and
universal satisfaction was manifested. In the evening I received the first
degree in Free Masonry in the Nauvoo Lodge, assembled in my general business
office.”



Joseph Smith –  Journal 1841–1842. Also in History of the Church, vol.4, p.550

 

Just seven weeks after his initiation as a first-degree mason, on April 4, 1842,
Joseph introduces the endowment ceremony in the upper room of his red brick
store; the same room where his Masonic initiation took place. Present were Hyrum
Smith, Brigham Young, William Law, Heber C. Kimball, and others.


 


SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MASONIC RITUALS AND THE LDS TEMPLE CEREMONY

 

What exactly was Joseph Smith exposed to during his initiation and is it
possible that any of it made its way into the endowment ceremony that he
introduced just weeks later? Three books on Freemasonry by William M. Morgan,
Jabez Richardson, and Malcolm C. Duncan reveal all of the rituals used in
Masonic temple ceremonies. They show that the words, actions, and symbols used
LDS temple ordinances have nearly identical Masonic sources. Below is a
collection of those that bare the most striking resemblances. (Illustrations of
Masonry by One of the Fraternity, 1827. Monitor of Free-Masonry, 1860. Masonic
Ritual and Monitor, 1866)



Compass and Square



Masonic compass and square: “The candidate then enters, the Senior Deacon at the
same time pressing his left breast with the point of the compass…As he enters,
the angle of the square is pressed against his right breast”



LDS sign of the compass and square: “Corresponding marks are found in your
individual garment. On the right is the mark of the square. … On the left is the
mark of the compass”



Washing and Anointing



Masonic washing ceremony: “Master orders the basin of the perfumed water and a
clean napkin to be brought to him, and directs candidate to wash his hands,
which he does … Master takes a box of perfumed ointment and anoints candidate on
his head, eyes, mouth, heart, the tip of his right ear, hand, foot.”



LDS initiatory: “Having authority, I wash you preparatory to your receiving your
anointings. I anoint your head … your ears … your eyes … your nose … your lips …
your neck … your shoulders … your back … your breast … your vitals and bowels …
your arms and hands … your loins … your legs and feet…”.

Apron



Masonic apron:  “I now present you with a lambskin or white Entered

Apprentice’s apron which is an emblem of innocence.”



LDS apron: “See, you are naked. Take you fig leaves and make you aprons.”



New Name



Masonic new name: “I also present you with a new name; it is ________.”



LDS new name: “I give you a new name which is never to be divulged to anyone
expect at a certain place and time shown you. The I shall give you is ________ .
”



Tokens
 

Masonic: Grip of Entered Apprentice



LDS: First Token of the Aaronic priesthood























 

Signs
 

Masonic: Due-guard of the Fellow Craft Mason.
 

LDS: Sign of the First Token of the Aaronic Priesthood.

























 


 

 

 

 

 

Masonic: Due-guard of the Master Mason.



LDS: Sign of the First Token of the Melchizedek Priesthood.

































 

 

 









 

Masonic: Real Grip of Fellow Craft



LDS: Second Token of the Aaronic priesthood























 

 

 

Masonic: DSign of the Fellow Craft Mason
 

LDS: Sign of the Second Token of the Aaronic Priesthood.

























 


 

 

 

 

 

Masonic: Sign of Grand Hailing Distress



LDS: Sign of the Second Token of the Melchizedek Priesthood.

































 

 







Penalties – Removed from LDS temple endowment in April 1990.



Masonic penalty sign of an Entered Apprentice and Oath: “Made from the due-guard
by dropping the left hand carelessly; at the same time raise the right arm and
draw the hand, still open, across the throat, thumb next to the throat, and drop
the hand perpendicular by the side.”



“Binding myself under no less penalty than to have my throat cut across, my
tongue torn out by the roots.”



LDS penalty of the First Token of the Aaronic Priesthood and Oath:
“The execution of the Penalty is represented by placing the thumb under the left
ear, the palm of the hand down, and by drawing the thumb quickly across the
throat to the right ear, and dropping the hand to the side.”



“We, and each of us, covenant and promise that we will not reveal any of the
secrets of this, the First Token of the Aaronic Priesthood, with its
accompanying name, sign, or penalty. Should we do so, we agree that our throats
be cut from ear to ear and our tongues torn out by our roots.”



 

Masonic penalty of the Fellow Craft: “Having my left breast torn open, my heart
plucked out, and given to the wild beasts of the field and the fowls of the
air.”



LDS penalty of the Second Token of the Aaronic Priesthood: “We agree to have our
breasts cut open and our hearts and vitals torn from our bodies and given to the
birds of the air and the beasts of the field.”



 

Masonic penalty of the Master Mason: “To have my body cut in two, my bowels
removed and burned to ashes which are then to be scattered to the four winds of
heaven.”



LDS penalty of the First Token of the Melchizedek Priesthood: “Should we do so,
we agree that our bodies be cut asunder in the midst and all our bowels gush
out.”




 

Instructions at the Veil



Masonic Mallet: (pictured)



LDS Mallet: “The person is brought to this point, and the worker gives three
distinct taps with the mallet. Whereupon, The Lord parts the Veil, and asks, “
What is wanted?”



 

Masonic Instructions: “The Master and candidate holding each other by the grip,
as before described, the Master says…”



Q. What is this?
A. A grip.



Q. A grip of what?
A. The grip of an Entered Apprentice Mason.



Q. Has it a name?
A. It has.



Q. Will you give it to me?
A. I did not so receive it, neither can I so impart it.



LDS INSTRUCTIONS AT THE VEIL: “Present him at the veil and his request shall be
granted…”



Q. What is that?
A. The second token of the Melchizedek priesthood.



Q. Has it a name?
A. It has.



Q. Will you give it to me?
A. I cannot, for I have not yet received it.







MASONIC SYMBOL USAGE

 

Bees and the Beehive



Industry was the employment of a very large number of men, tens of thousands in
many instances, on one undertaking at one place and at the same time period. 
Where a modern builder looks to machines as the means to accomplish his results,
the Medieval builder who had no power-driven machines had to look to men. It was
for such reason that Medieval Freemasons thought much about and had a wide
knowledge of the forms of work.



The general organization of a Lodge is based on the principle of forms of work.
An emblem of work, called industry, is the Beehive. Hence looking at the
regulated labor of these insects when congregated in their hive, it is not
surprising that a beehive should have been deemed an appropriate emblem of
systematized industry. Freemasonry has therefore adopted the beehive as a symbol
of industry.

Albert G. Mackey – Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, 1895



 

All Seeing Eye



Masonic – “The open eye was selected as a symbol of watchfulness and care of the
universe. The All-Seeing Eye may then be considered as a symbol of God
manifested in his omnipresence, his guardian and his preserving character.”

Albert G. Mackey – Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, 1894



LDS – “The Salt Lake temple is reportedly the singly visual symbol that most
quickly communicates “Mormon” to others. Overwhelmed by the building itself,
people may not realize how extensive the ornamentation is … on the east and west
center towers with accompanying stones representing an all-seeing eye and
clasped hands.” “The all seeing eye is a symbol of God’s protection and
omnipresence.”

The Salt Lake Temple, Ensign, Jan, 1978 and
Gerald E. Hansen – Sacred Walls: Learning From
Temple Symbols, Deseret Book, 2009




Sun, Moon, and Stars



Masonic – The book ‘Heaven and its Wonders and Hell From Things Heard and Seen’
by Emanuel Swedenborg, a Freemason, was first published in America in 1812. He
uses the sun, moon, and stars to describe varying degrees of heavenly
relationships with the Lord, the closest being named the Celestial Kingdom. “In
the Celestial Kingdom the light appears flaming because the angels there receive
light from the Lord as a sun; but in the spiritual kingdom, the light is shining
white because the angels there receive light from the Lord as a moon … but those
that are in hell turn themselves to opposite darkness and dense darkness.”

Emanuel Swedenborg – Heaven and Hell, Ch.5 – There Are Three Heavens, p.28



LDS – “Latter-day revelation confirms the teaching of the Bible on these matters
and verifies that there are three general categories or glories to which the
members of the human family will be assigned in their judgment following their
resurrection from the grave. These are known as the Celestial, Terrestrial and
Telestial Kingdoms, of which the sun, moon, and stars are spoken of as being
typical.”



LDS.org/scriptures/bd/degrees-of-glory




CONTEXT


 

March 15, 1842 – Joseph Smith became a Freemason in his general business office.

History of the Church, vol.4, p.551



May 4, 1842 – Joseph instructed the other leaders on the washings, anointing,
signs, and tokens.

History of the Church, vol.5, p.2




 

Parallels between Freemasonry and the LDS endowment appear to be problematic. It
seems that every LDS temple ceremony has a nearly identical masonic ceremony
with the corresponding words, token, sign and symbol. This begs the question –
Could Joseph Smith have simply borrowed this “revelation”?














CHAPTER 7


POLYGAMY


Ch. 7



What kind of motivations could a man have to wed many women? By some estimates
Joseph Smith married up to 52 women from a growing group of people that
intensely admired him and that he held great influence over. For unspecified
reasons his polygamy is never addressed in the Church education system, yet when
studied in detail, problems appear concerning the timeline that Joseph began
this practice, the secretive nature with subsequent denial, and the types of
women married.






TIMELINE

An issue arises when we compare the date of the revelation to begin polygamy and
the dates of Joseph’s marriages.



Doctrine and Covenants, Section 132
Revelation given through Joseph Smith the Prophet, at Nauvoo, Illinois,
recorded July 12, 1843, relating to the new and everlasting covenant, including
the eternity of the marriage covenant and the principle of plural marriage.



(The Church has recently amended this heading to include, “evidence indicates
that some of the principles involved in this revelation were known by the
Prophet as early as 1831.” What they fail to clarify is that the 1831 revelation
shows that Joseph instructed some elders to “take unto you wives of the
Lamanites and Nephites, that their posterity may become white, delightsome”
Letter from W.W. Phelps to Brigham Young, August 12, 1861, Joseph Smith
Collection, LDS Church Historians Office.)



In 1833 Fanny Alger became Joseph’s first marriage after Emma – ten years before
the official revelation. At the time, Fanny was living in the Smith home,
helping Emma with housework and the children. A family friend, one of Brigham
Young’s plural wives, recalls,



“Mrs. Smith had an adopted daughter, a very pretty, pleasing young girl, about
seventeen years old. She was extremely fond of her; no mother could be more
devoted, and their affection for each other was a constant object of remark, so
absorbing and genuine did it seem. Consequently, it was with a shocked surprise
that the people heard that sister Emma had turned Fanny out of the house in the
night…By degrees, it became whispered about that Joseph’s love for his adopted
daughter was by no means a paternal affection, and his wife discovering the
fact, at once took measures to place the girl beyond his reach. Since Emma
refused decidedly to allow her to remain in her house … my mother offered to
take her until she could be sent to her relatives”

Ann Eliza Webb Young- Wife No. 19, 1875

 

Oliver Cowdery also addresses this situation when he noted his extreme
displeasure regarding Joseph’s conduct with Fanny Alger while married to Emma.
In a letter to his brother, Warren A. Cowdery, Oliver wrote:



“We had some conversation in which in every instance I did not fail to affirm
that what I had said was strictly true. A dirty, nasty, filthy affair of his and
Fanny Alger’s was talked over in which I strictly declared that I had never
deserted from the truth in that matter and as I supposed was admitted by
himself.”

Oliver Cowdery – Far West, Missouri, January 21, 1839

 

Even with Oliver’s important role in the formation of the Church, Joseph could
not allow his affairs to become public. The issue of polygamy divided Oliver and
Joseph so wide that Joseph turned Oliver out of the Church after his unceasing
disapproval of the practice.








SECRETS AND DENIAL

Additional marriages were kept secret and when word began to spread Joseph
turned to outright denial.



Emily and Eliza Partridge

 

Emily and Eliza were the daughters of the first bishop of the Church, Edward
Partridge. When he passed away, his daughters Emily (16) and Eliza (20) sought
work as maids to help support their family. Emily recalls:



“The first door that opened for us was to go to Smith’s, which we accepted.” “[I
was] a nurse girl, for they had a young baby … Joseph and Emma were very kind to
us; they were almost like a father and mother, and I loved Emma and the
children.” “the Prophet Joseph and his wife Emma offered us a home in their
family … We had been there about a year when the principle of plural marriage
was made known to us, and I was married to Joseph Smith on the 4th of March
1843, Elder Heber C. Kimball performing the ceremony. My sister Eliza was also
married to Joseph a few days later. This was done without the knowledge of Emma
Smith. Two months afterward she consented to give her husband two wives,
providing he would give her the privilege of choosing them. She accordingly
chose my sister Eliza and myself, and to save family trouble Brother Joseph
thought it best to have another ceremony performed. Accordingly on the 11th of
May, 1843, we were sealed to Joseph Smith a second time, in Emma’s presence …
From that very hour, however, Emma was our bitter enemy. We remained in the
family several months after this, but things went from bad to worse until we
were obligated to leave the house and find another home.”

Emily Dow Partridge – Diary March 19, 1892, L. Tomy Perry
special collection, Harold B. Lee Library, BYU




 

Sarah Ann Whitney



Joseph sought to add 17 year-old Sarah Ann Whitney to his growing collection of
wives. Joseph penned a letter divulging his feelings for her.


 

“…my feelings are so strong for you since what has passed lately between us…it
seems, as if I could not live long in this way; and if you three would come and
see me…it would afford me great relief…I know it is the will of God that you
should comfort me now in this time of affliction…the only thing to be careful
of; is to find out when Emma comes then you cannot be safe, but when she is not
here, there is the most perfect safety…burn this letter as soon as you read it;
keep all locked up in your breasts…You will pardon me for my earnestness on this
subject when you consider how lonesome I must be…I think Emma wont come tonight
if she don’t fail to come tonight…”

Joseph Smith – George Albert Smith Family Papers, Early Smith Documents,
1731-1849 , Marriott Library, University of Utah



Joseph had to convince her parents to allow the secret marriage. There had to be
compensation. Six weeks after the secret sealing, Joseph deeded to Sarah a lot
of land only one block from his home. It was rare for a woman to own land in
Nauvoo, especially a woman as young as Sarah. A large issue soon arose. As a
secret bride of the prophet, she was not available for courtship any longer.
Appearing single while refusing suitors was bound to raise suspicions. Joseph
decided to arrange a civil marriage between Sarah and recent widower, Joseph C.
Kingsbury. This would make it seem as though Sarah was no longer available.
Joseph Smith officiated over what Kingsbury later called a “pretended marriage”
between him and Sarah the following month.




 

“On the 29th of April 1843 I, according to President Joseph Smith … agreed to
stand by Sarah Ann Whitney as supposed to be her husband and had a pretended
marriage.”

Joseph C. Kingsbury – Journal, p.13, Boap.org/LDS/Early-Saints/JCKingsbury.html




 

1835 Statement on Marriage



While still before the official revelation on plural marriage in 1843, an early
edition of the Doctrine and Covenants reprints a statement by Joseph addressing
the public’s concern with his illegal practice of polygamy:



“Statement on Marriage. August 17, 1835. Inasmuch as this Church of Christ has
been reproached with the crime of fornication, and polygamy: we declare that we
believe, that one man should have one wife; and one woman, but one husband,
except in case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again.”



Josephsmithpapers.org/papersummary/doctrine-andcovenants-1844?p=441




 

This passage has since been removed from later editions of the D&C. Why would
Joseph mention that the Church was accused of the crime of polygamy in 1835 when
supposedly God didn’t reveal this practice until 1843? Probably because by the
time that Section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants was written, Joseph had wed
29 women by his own desire.





1844 Statement on Marriage



As late as 1844 Joseph continued to deny his involvement in polygamy despite
having well over 30 wives by this point.



“I had not been married scarcely five minutes, and made one proclamation of the
Gospel before it was reported that I had seven wives…I wish the grand jury would
tell me who they are – whether it will be a curse or a blessing to me. I am
quite tired of the fools asking me…What a thing it is for a man to be accused of
committing adultery, and having seven wives when I can only find one. I am the
same man, and as innocent as I was fourteen years ago, and I can prove them all
perjurers.”

Joseph Smith – Nauvoo, History of the Church, May 26, 1844, vol.6, pp.410-411

 


 


THE WOMEN

Due to the secretive nature of Joseph’s affairs, the actual total number of
wives Joseph took is unclear. Written records, primary accounts, and second-hand
accounts put the number between 29-52 women. Most disturbing was the fact that
many of these women were either already married, much younger, related to each
other, or a combination.



Married

Record show at least 13 women were married to other men at the time Joseph took
them for his wives. He sent several men on missions for the Church then married
their wives, or married their wives in secret and then sent the husbands on
missions afterward.



Marinda Nancy Johnson-Hyde-Smith



In September 1831, Joseph and Emma Smith moved in with the Johnson family while
Joseph and Sidney Rigdon worked on translating the Bible. While staying with the
Johnsons in March 1832, Joseph Smith was dragged out by a mob and tarred and
feathered. Marinda’s brother Eli led the mob because he felt that Joseph had
been too intimate with Marinda. Soon Marinda married apostle Orson Hyde. On
April 6, 1840, Orson was sent  on  a  3  year  mission  to  Jerusalem.   
Shortly  after  his 



departure, Joseph married his wife Nancy Marinda Johnson-Hyde while Orson was
gone. In Joseph Smith’s journal, in a list of his marriages, he wrote: “Apr 42
Marinda Johnson to Joseph Smith.”  Later Orson and Marinda separated.

Zina Diantha Huntington-Jacobs


Zina was 18 when her mother died and after went to live in the Smiths' home.
Soon she met Joseph’s friend, Henry Jacobs. Joseph was to officiate their
wedding but never showed. Instead, Bishop John C. Bennett performed the
marriage. Later, Zina asked Joseph why he didn’t show,



“He told her it had been made known to him that she was to be his Celestial Wife
and he could not give to another one who had been given to him.”

Henry Jacobs, History of Henry Bailey Jacobs



During Henry and Zina’s marriage, Joseph sent Henry on 8 missions. At one point
Joseph sent a message to Zina through her brother Dimick. It read,



“Tell Zina I have put it off and put it off until an angel with a drawn sword
has stood before me and told me if I did not establish that principle and live
it, I would lose my position and my life and the Church could progress no
further.”



Joseph Smith – Zina D.H.Smith, Joseph the Prophet: His Life and
Mission as Viewed by Intimate Acquaintances, January 18, 1895, p.21




 

After four proposals and pressured with the responsibility for the life of the
prophet, Zina finally accepted.



After Joseph’s death, Brigham Young also took Zina for his wife while she was
still married to Henry Jacobs. Brigham called Henry to serve a mission in
England and told him to find another wife. While Henry was in England, Zina
began living at the Young house with her children and soon bore a child with
Brigham.





Vilate Kimball



“Shortly after Heber’s return from England, he was introduced to the doctrine of
plural marriage directly through a startling test. He had already sacrificed
homes, possessions, friends, relatives, all worldly rewards, peace, and
tranquility for the Restoration. Nothing was left to place on the altar save his
life, his children, and his wife. Then came the Abrahamic test. Joseph demanded
for himself what to Heber was the unthinkable, his Vilate. Totally crushed
spiritually and emotionally, Heber touched neither food nor water for three days
and three nights and continually sought confirmation and comfort from God. On
the evening of the third day, some kind of assurance came, and Heber took Vilate
to the upper room of Joseph’s store on Water Street. The Prophet wept at this
act of faith, devotion, and obedience. Joseph never intended to take Vilate. It
was all a test.”



Heber C. Kimball – Mormon Patriarch and Pioneer by Stanley B. Kimball, p.93

 

 

 

Teenagers

 

Ten of Joseph’s wives were teenagers with a 10-23 year age difference between
them.



Helen Mar Kimball-Smith



Instead of taking Heber C. Kimball’s wife, Vilate, as Joseph had done with
others, he married Heber’s 14-year-old daughter, Helen, in May of 1843. The
Church confirmed this fact in the essay “Plural Marriage in Kirtland and Nauvoo”
when it states that,



 

“The youngest was Helen Mar Kimball, daughter of Joseph’s close friends Heber C.
and Vilate Murray Kimball, who was sealed to Joseph several months before her
15th birthday.”

Plural Marriage in Kirtland and Nauvoo, LDS.org, Oct. 2014



“My father asked me if I would believe him if he told me that it was right for
married men to take other wives, my sensibilities were painfully touched, for to
mention such a thing to me I thought altogether unworthy of my father. And as
quick as he spoke, I replied to him shortly and emphatically, “No I wouldn’t.



“But having a great desire to be connected with the Prophet Joseph, my father
offered me to him. My father had but one ewe lamb and willingly laid me upon the
altar. How cruel this seemed to my mother whose heartstrings were already
stretched until they were ready to snap asunder.



“Then father asked me if I would be sealed to Joseph and left me to reflect upon
it for the next 24 hours. Joseph then came to me and said that if I will take
this step it will ensure my eternal salvation and that of my father’s household
and all of our kindred. His promise was so great that I willingly gave myself to
purchase so glorious a reward.



“None but God and his angels could see my mother’s bleeding heart when Joseph
asked her if she was willing, she replied, “If Helen is willing, I have nothing
more to say.” She had witnessed the sufferings of others who were older and who
better understood the step they were taking, bit to see her child, who had yet
seen her 15th summer, follow the same thorny path [of polygamy], in her mind she
saw the misery which was as sure to come as the sun was to rise.



“I would never have been sealed to Joseph had I known it was anything more than
a ceremony. I was young and they deceived me by saying the salvation of our
whole family depended on it.”

Helen Mar Kimball – Journal, Women’s Exponent, vol. 9-10, 1880 and
Narrative of Some of the Proceedings of the Mormons, 1848

 

 

Joseph told a reluctant Helen Mar Kimball that if she married him it would
ensure her salvation and the salvation of all her family. Imagine the burden on
a 14-year-old girl’s emotions of salvation for her entire family riding on
accepting Joseph’s proposal.




 

Nancy Winchester



While records show Nancy was married to Joseph, no dates were written. At the
time of Joseph’s death, Nancy was 15 years old. It is possible that, like Helen
Mar Kimball, Nancy could have been 14.

 

Unlike what is commonly taught in Sunday school lessons, marriages to young
teenagers were not common in pioneer days.



“In 1890, when the U.S. Census Bureau started collecting marriage data, it was
recorded that the average age of a first marriage for men was 26 years, and the
average age of marriage for women was 22 years.”

Classroom.synonym.com/agemarriage-us-1800s-23174.html




 


 

Pairs of Sisters



Emily Dow Partridge and Eliza Maria Partridge

Sara Lawrence and Maria Lawrence

Zina Huntington Jacobs and Presidia Huntington Buell







Mothers and Daughters



Patty Bartlett Sessions (Mother) and Sylvia Sessions Lyon (Daughter)








THE OUTCOME

 

Polygamy upset many of the early leaders of the Church, including 2nd Councilor
in the First Presidency, William Law. Joseph Smith excommunicated William for
protesting his attempt to start a romantic relationship with William’s wife,
Jane.

 

“Smith made his visit to his wife in the middle of the night when he knew her
husband to be absent. Joseph had asked her to give him half her love; she was at
liberty to keep the other half for her husband.”

Ann Eliza Young – Wife No. 19, 1876, p.61




 

After his excommunication, William spoke out against Joseph’s practice of taking
secret wives while Joseph continued to publicly imply that he had only one wife.
William Law then started a newspaper called the Nauvoo Expositor. In print, he
spoke of the polygamous affairs of Joseph Smith. This led to an emergency
session of the Nauvoo city council; of which Joseph was mayor. In this session
Joseph ordered the printing press be destroyed.



“To the Marshal of said City, greeting. You are here commanded to destroy the
printing press from whence issues the Nauvoo Expositor, and pi the type of said
printing establishment in the street, and burn all the Expositors and libelous
handbills found in said establishment; and if resistance be offered to your
execution of this order by the owners or others, demolish the house; and if
anyone threatens you or the mayor or the officers of the city, arrest those who
threaten you, and fail not to execute this order without delay, and make due
return hereon. By order of the City Council, Joseph Smith, Mayor.”

Joseph Smith – History of the Church, vol.6, p.448

 

 

In his book, Carthage Conspiracy, Elder Dallin H. Oaks recounts the events of
Joseph’s executive order.



“Joseph Smith, acting as mayor, ordered the city marshal to destroy the
newspaper and press without delay and instructed the major general of the Nauvoo
Legion to have the militia assist.

Dallin H. Oaks-Carthage Conspiracy, p.15




 

Chief of Police Johnathan Dunham and City Marshal John Greene, leading the mob
of over 200 saints, armed with muskets, knives pistols, converged on William
Law’s brick office. They broke open the door with a sledgehammer and found
Chauncey Higbee and Charles Foster inside the building. Higbee and Foster put up
no resistance as Joseph’s men trashed the interior of the newly built building.



“They tumbled the press and materials into the street, and set fire to them, and
demolished the machinery with a sledgehammer, and injured the building very
materially. We made no resistance, but looked on and felt revenge, but leave it
for the public to avenge this climax of insult and injury.”



Charles Foster – Warsaw Signal, June 12, 1844

After destroying William Law’s $2,000 letterpress, the mob of saints tossed the
entire contents of William’s office into the street and set it on fire. The mob
then made their way to Joseph’s home to report their actions.



“About 8 pm, the Marshal returned and reported that he had removed the press,
type, printed paper, and fixtures into the street, and destroyed them. The posse
accompanied by some hundreds of the citizens, returned with the Marshal to the
front of the mansion, when I gave them a short address, and told them they had
done right. I then blessed them in the name of the Lord. This speech was loudly
greeted by the assembly with three-times-cheers. The posse and assembly then
dispersed all in good order.”

Joseph Smith – History of the Church, vol6, ch.21



William Law was in the city of Carthage at the time and later wrote that he did
not believe what he heard until he rode his horse to Nauvoo and “rode over our
type and broken furniture.“



“[Governor] Ford wrote Smith on the next day, denouncing the city’s proceedings
as unlawful and demanding that those involved in the move against the
‘Expositor’ submit to the processes of the law at Carthage.”

Dallin H. Oaks – Carthage Conspiracy, p.16



The result of his actions put Joseph Smith in prison for the last time.





 


CONTEXT

 

Members have been taught that the times Joseph Smith spent incarcerated in jails
were because Satan stirred up the hearts of men to falsely imprison him, yet
nothing is ever said of the actual crimes committed by Joseph and his followers.
Joseph’s increasingly public acts of illegal polygamy, combined with the
destruction of the Nauvoo Expositor and rising tensions between the Nauvoo
militia and the state of Illinois, caused his last incarceration.



The actions of Joseph Smith raise several troubling concerns. Why would the
prophet begin taking wives 10 years before receiving the official revelation?
Why did he send men on missions and marry their wives? Why did he marry girls as
young as 14 when he was nearly 40? Why would his closest friends take such great
issue with his actions? Why does Joseph try to hide these actions from his wife,
Emma? And why did he react so violently to those that tried to make his actions
public? Does polygamy seem to be truly ordained of God?






 


CHAPTER 8


RACE AND THE CHURCH





Ch. 8



“Cain slew his brother… and the lord put a mark upon on him, which is the flat
nose and black skin… If the white man, who belongs to the chosen seed, mixes his
blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of god, is death on the
spot. This will always be so. ”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses
vol. 7. pp. 290-291, vol. 10,p.110

For over 150 years the Church has taught and sustained racially prejudiced
doctrines while attributing these actions to the will of God. These teachings
include a ban on black members from holding the priesthood and participating in
the temple, and went as far as preaching death as a consequence for inter-race
marriage. Recently, the Church has tried to clean up this part of its image by
disavowing these past teachings.






RACIST TEACHINGS

 

President Brigham Young



“Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man
belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty,
under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol.10, p.110

 

“How long is that race to endure the dreadful curse that is upon them? That
curse will remain upon them, and they never can hold the Priesthood or share in
it until all the other descendants of Adam have received the promises and
enjoyed the blessings of the Priesthood and the keys thereof. Until the last
ones of the residue of Adam’s children are brought up to that favourable
position, the children of Cain cannot receive the first ordinances of the
Priesthood. They were the first that were cursed, and they will be the last from
whom the curse will be removed.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol.7, p.290

 

“You may inquire of the intelligent of the world whether they can tell why the
aborigines of this country are dark, loathsome, ignorant, and sunken into the
depths of degradation …When the Lord has a people, he makes covenants with them
and gives unto them promises: then, if they transgress his law, change his
ordinances, and break his covenants he has made with them, he will put a mark
upon them, as in the case of the Lamanites and other portions of the house of
Israel; but by‑and‑by they will become a white and delightsome people.

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol.7, pp.335-338

 

“You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely,
disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all
the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol.7, pp.282-291

 


 

President George Albert Smith



“The attitude of the Church with reference to Negroes remains as it has always
stood. It is not a matter of the declaration of a policy but of direct
commandment from the Lord, on which is founded the doctrine of the Church from
the days of its organization, to the effect that Negroes may become members of
the Church but that they are not entitled to the priesthood at the present time
… The position of the Church regarding the Negro may be understood when another
doctrine of the church is kept in mind, namely, that the conduct of spirits in
the pre‑mortal existence has some determining effect upon the conditions and
circumstances under which these spirits take on mortality.”

George Albert Smith – Statement by the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus
Christ of  Latter Day Saints on the Negro Question,August 17, 1949



 

President Joseph Fielding Smith

 

“That negro race, for instance, have been placed under restrictions because of
their attitude in the world of spirits, few will doubt. It cannot be looked upon
as just that they should be deprived of the power of the Priesthood without it
being a punishment for some act, or acts, performed before they were born.”

Joseph Fielding Smith – The Way to Perfection, 1940

 

“Not only was Cain called upon to suffer, but because of his wickedness he
became the father of an inferior race. A curse was placed upon him and that
curse has been continued through his lineage and must do so while time endures.
Millions of souls have come into this world cursed with a black skin and have
been denied the privilege of Priesthood and the fullness of the blessing of the
Gospel. These are the descendants of Cain.”

Joseph Fielding Smith – The Way to Perfection, 1940

 

Apostle Mark E. Peterson



“We must not inter-marry with the Negro. Why? If I were to marry a Negro woman
and have children by her, my children would all be cursed as to the priesthood.
Do I want my children cursed as to the priesthood? If there is one drop of Negro
blood in my children, as I have read to you, they receive the curse. There isn’t
any argument, therefore, as to inter-marriage with the Negro, is there? There
are 50 million Negroes in the United States. If they were to achieve complete
absorption with the white race, think what that would do.”

Mark E. Peterson – Race Problems as They Affect the Church, address given at
BYU,
August 27, 1954. Marriott Library University of Utah, Mark E. Peterson Papers

 

“In spite of all he did in the pre-existent life, the Lord is willing, if the
Negro accepts the gospel with real, sincere faith, and is really converted, to
give him the blessings of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost. If that Negro
is faithful all his days, he can and will enter the celestial kingdom. He will
go there as a servant”

Mark E. Peterson – Race Problems as They Affect the Church, address given at
BYU,
August 27, 1954. Marriott Library University of Utah, Mark E. Peterson Papers


 

 

Apostle Bruce R. McConkie

 

“Negroes in this life are denied the Priesthood; under no circumstances can they
hold this delegation of authority from the Almighty. The gospel message of
salvation is not carried affirmatively to them…Negroes are not equal with other
races where the receipt of certain spiritual blessings are concerned,
particularlythe priesthood and the temple blessings that flow there from, but
this inequality is not of man’s origin. It is the Lord’s doing, is based on his
eternal laws of justice, and grows out of the lack of Spiritual valiance of
those concerned in their first estate.”

Bruce R. McConkie – Mormon Doctrine, 1966, pp.527-528

 

 

President David O. McKay



“The seeming discrimination by the Church toward the Negro is not something
which originated with man; but goes back into the beginning with God… Revelation
assures us that this plan antedates man’s mortal existence, extending back to
man’s preexistent state.”

Pres. David O. McKay – Hugh B. Brown, N. Eldon Tanner – Letter of the first
Presidency
Church’s  Position on the Negro – Dec. 15, 1969, The Improvement Era, Feb. 1970,
p.71

 

 

SLAVERY


 



“I will remark with regard to slavery, inasmuch as we believe in the Bible,
inasmuch as we believe in the ordinances of God, in the priesthood and order and
decrees of God, we must believe in slavery. I am a firm believer in slavery.”

Brigham Young – Address to joint session of legislature, January 23, 1852
Recorded by George D. Watt, Historian’s Office Reports
of Speeches, Church History Library, Salt lake city, Utah


 



Seeing California as an abundant supply source for Utah, in 1851, President
Brigham Young sent a company of 437 saints, lead by Apostles Amasa M. Lyman and
Charles C. Rich, to settle in Rancho San Bernardino, California. This company
included a large number of slaves.



“As respects [to] slavery in the territory, we were assured that there was
little of it there, yet it is there. Some slaves had been liberated by their
owners since they were taken to Utah; others still remain slaves. But the most
of those who take slaves there pass over with them in a little while to San
Bernardino, a Mormon settlement in California … How many slaves are now held
there they could not say, but the number relatively was by no means small. A
single person had taken between forty and fifty, and many had gone in with
smaller numbers.”

The Latter Day Saints’ Millennial Star – 1855, vol.17, p.63



 

CIVIL RIGHTS

In February of 1964, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act prohibiting
discrimination according to race, religion, or sex. Four years later, Rev.
Martin Luther King was martyred for his role as a leader in the movement. After
his death, black preachers continued to call for full integration of blacks into
white restrooms, buses, schools, jobs, and neighborhoods. As a church claiming
to be led by Jesus Christ himself, I would expect it to be on the front line in
the fight for equal rights for all people. Instead the Church did nothing; in
fact, they actually tried to prevent it. In January 1964, member of the Quorum
of the 12 Apostles, Delbert L. Stapley, wrote to LDS Michigan Governor, George
Romney. Governor Romney would later campaign to be President of the United
States, as did his son, Mitt Romeny. In his letter, Elder Stapley urged Governor
Romney not to support the Civil Rights Act as it would bring the integration of
blacks into society.



“I am sure you know that the Prophet Joseph Smith, in connection with the Negro
problem of this country, proposed to Congress that they sell public lands and
buy up the Negro slaves and transport them back to Africa from whence they came.
I am sure the Prophet, with his vision and understanding, foresaw the problems
we are faced with today with this race, which caused him to promote this
program. When I reflect upon the Prophet’s statements and remember what happened
to three of our nation’s presidents who were very active in the Negro cause, I
am sobered by their demise. They went contrary to the teachings of the Prophet
Joseph Smith unwittingly, no doubt, but nevertheless, the prophecy of
JosephSmith, “those who are determined to pursue a course, which shows an
opposition, and a feverish restlessness against the decrees of the Lord, will
learn, when perhaps it is too late for their own good, that God can do His own
work, without the aid of those who are not dictated by His counsel,” has and
will continue to be fulfilled.”

Delbert L. Stapley – Letter to Gov. George Romney, January 23, 1964
Archive.org/stream/DelbertStapleyLetter/delbert-stapley_Letter#page/n0/mode/2up



In his letter, Elder Stapley warned Governor Romney that support for civil
rights was against the will of the Lord as revealed through Joseph Smith.
Stapley further cautioned that punishments are in store for those who seek
equality in such ways. As evidence for such dire warnings, Stapley wrote that
three U. S. Presidents who had fought for equality and civil rights met an
untimely death – Lincoln and Kennedy by assassination and Grant by cancer.



Future President, then Elder Ezra Taft Benson gave a talk in general conference
after the passing of the Civil Rights Act and before the Church changed its
stance on the issue:

 

“There is no doubt that the so-called civil rights movement as it exists today
is used as a Communist program for revolution in America.”

Then Elder Ezra Taft Benson – Trust Not in the Arm of Flesh,
General Conference, Ensign, October 1967


 

 

The Civil Rights Act brought equal treatment for all people in this country and
ended legal segregation. To refer to it as “the so-called civil rights movement”
is to belittle its great significance. Remember, this was at the height of the
ColdWar between the U.S. and Russia and to refer to someone or something as
communist during this time was an extremely derogatory and dangerous statement.
Elder Benson does not sound like the Lord’s anointed bringing a message of love.
It seems that the basis of these prejudice doctrines may have began with the
culture of racism held by early general authorities and perpetuated by the
following leaders until the direction the nation was moving forced the hand of
the Church.






DISTANCING ITSELF FROM THE PAST

Published in 2013 on LDS.org is an article named, Race and the Priesthood.



“Today, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is
a sign of divine disfavor or curse, or that it reflects actions in a premortal
life; that mixedrace marriages are a sin; or that blacks or people of any other
race or ethnicity are inferior in any way to anyone else.”

Race and the Priesthood – December 6, 2013.
LDS.org/topics/race-and-the-priesthood?lang=eng




 

This latest manifesto is shocking for the rejection of teachings by past
prophets as just “theories.” Contained in this quote from the article, the
Church blatantly contradicts itself when disavowing:





“…that black skin is a sign of disfavor or curse…”

 

“A curse was placed upon him and that curse has been continued through his
lineage and must do so while time endures. Millions of souls have come into this
world cursed with a black skin and have been denied the privilege of Priesthood
and the fullness of the blessing of the Gospel. These are the descendants of
Cain.”

President Joseph Fielding Smith

 

“…that it reflects actions in a premortal life…”



“The position of the Church regarding the Negro may be understood when another
doctrine of the church is kept in mind, namely, that the conduct of spirits in
the premortal existence has some determining effect upon the conditions and
circumstances under which these spirits take on mortality.”

President George Albert Smith

 

“… that mixed-race marriages are a sin…”



“If the white man belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of
Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot.”

President Brigham Young




 

“…that blacks…are inferior in any way to anyone else…”

 

“…some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely,
disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all
the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind.”

President Brigham Young

 

With this article, the Church disavows 4 points of doctrine that have been in
place for 150 years and invalidates the words of the prophets by calling their
teachings just “theories.”






FOLLOW THE PROPHET

The Church reminds us to give strict obedience to the prophet because he speaks
for God and is incapable of misconduct.

 

“The Lord will never permit me or any other man who stands as President of this
Church to lead you astray. It is not in the programme. It is not in the mind of
God. If I were to attempt that, the Lord would remove me out of my place, and so
He will any other man who attempts to lead the children of men astray from the
oracles of God and from their duty.”

President Wilford Woodruff- General Conference, October 1890

 



“Keep your eye on the Prophet, for the Lord will never permit his Prophet to
lead this Church astray.”

President Ezra Taft Benson- General Conference, October 1966

 

 

“Follow your leaders who have been duly ordained and have been publicly
sustained, and you will not be led astray.”

Elder Boyd K. Packer- General Conference, October 1992

 

 

“Follow the prophet, follow the prophet, Follow the prophet; don’t go astray.
Follow the prophet, follow the prophet, Follow the prophet; he knows the way.”

Children’s Songbook





Today the Church says the past leaders were in error because their statements
were just “theories”. Applying the idea that the priesthood ban on blacks was
just a theory also doesn’t make much sense when considering what Pres. David O.
McKay stated, “…discrimination by the Church toward the Negro is not something
which originated with man; but goes back into the beginning with God.”

 

If prophets claim to speak the will of Heavenly Father when their words can be
later disavowed, then how was it that they were prophets at all? This completely
undermines the ‘prophet will never lead us astray’ principle. What doctrines
currently attributed to God by today’s prophet can be discredited as just
“theories” by future general authorities?












CHAPTER 9


BLOOD ATONEMENT


Ch. 9



“Joseph Smith taught that there were certain sins so grievous that man may
commit, that they will place the transgressors beyond the power of the atonement
of Christ. If these offenses are committed, then the blood of Christ will not
cleanse them from their sins even though they repent. Therefore their only hope
is to have their bloodshed to atone, as far as possible, in their behalf. This
is scriptural doctrine, and is taught in all the standard works of the Church.”

President Joseph Fielding Smith – Doctrines of Salvation, 1954, vol. 1,
pp.135-136

Brigham Young

 

Brigham Young took the doctrine of blood atonement even further. While Joseph
might have emphasized the practice of blood atonement against sinful Mormons,
Brigham inspired his followers to murder in God’s name both Mormons and
non-Mormons alike.



“Suppose you found your brother in bed with your wife, and put a javelin through
both of them. You would be justified, and they would atone for their sins, and
be received into the Kingdom of God. I would at once do so, in such a case; and
under the circumstances, I have no wife whom I love so well that I would not put
a javelin through her heart, and I would do it with clean hands…. There is not a
man or woman, who violates the covenants made with their God, that will not be
required to pay the debt. The blood of Christ will never wipe that out, your own
blood must atone for it.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol.1, pp.108-109

 

“All mankind love themselves, and let these principles be known by an
individual, and he would be glad to have his blood shed. That would be loving
themselves, even unto an eternal exaltation. Will you love your brothers and
sisters likewise, when they have committed a sin that cannot be atoned for
without the shedding of their blood? Will you love that man or woman well enough
to shed their blood? I could refer you to plenty of instances where men have
been righteously slain, in order to atone for their sins.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol. 4, pp.219-20

 

“There are sins that men commit for which they cannot receive forgiveness in
this world, or in that which is to come, and if they had their eyes open to see
their true condition, they would be perfectly willing to have their blood spilt
upon the ground, that the smoke thereof might ascend to heaven as an offering
for their sins; and the smoking incense would atone for their sins, whereas, if
such is not the case, they will stick to them and remain upon them in the spirit
world … I know, when you hear my brethren telling about cutting people off from
the earth, that you consider it is strong doctrine; but it is to save them, not
to destroy them.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol.4, p.53

 

“This is loving your neighbor as ourselves; if he needs help, help him; and if
he wants salvation and it is necessary to spill his blood on the earth in order
that he may be saved, spill it.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol.4, p.220

Along with Porter Rockwell, William Hickman was bodyguard to Joseph Smith then
Brigham Young. In his autobiography, Hickman confessed that he was often tasked
by Brigham to take the lives of men.





“I found him, used him up, scalped him, and took his scalp to Brigham Young … He
took it and thanked me very much. This was my first act of violence under the
rule of Brigham Young.”

William Hickman – The Autobiography of William Hickman,
Brigham’s Destroying Angel: The Life Confessions and
Startling Disclosures, Salt Lake City, 1872, p.47





After feeling remorse later in his life, Hickman confessed his crimes to R. N.
Baskin, mayor of Salt Lake City and member of the Utah Supreme Court. Justice
Baskins states,



“The Danites were an organization in the Mormon church. Its existence was stated
by Bill Hickman in his confession made to me. He stated that the members were
bound by their covenants to execute the orders of the priesthood, and that when
a direct order or intimation was given to ‘use up’ anyone, it was always
executed by one or more of the members. Hickman confessed to me that he
personally knew of thirteen persons having been murdered, some of them by him …
that at one time he murdered a man by the name of Buck at the personal request
of Brigham Young.”

R.N. Baskin Reminiscences of Early Utah, 1914, p150

Heber C. Kimball



“If men turn traitors to God and His servants, their blood will surely be shed,
or else they will be damned, and that too according to their covenants.”

Heber C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses, vol.4, p.375

 

“Judas was like salt that had lost its saving principles—good for nothing but to
be cast out and trodden under foot of men…. It is so with you, ye Elders of
Israel, when you forfeit your covenants…. I know the day is right at hand when
men will forfeit their Priesthood and turn against us and against the covenants
they have made, and they will be destroyed as Judas was.”

Heber C. Kimball – Journal of Discourses, vol.6, pp.125-26

 

“These are my views, and the Lord knows that I believe in the principles of
sanctification; and when I am guilty of seducing any man’s wife, or any woman in
God’s world, I say, sever my head from my body.”

Heber C. Kimball – Journal of Discourses, vol.7, p.20

 

Jebediah M. Grant



“I say, there are men and women that I would advise to go to the Presidency
immediately, and ask him to appoint a committee to attend to their care; and
then let a place be selected, and let that committee shed their blood. We have
amongst us that are full of all manner of abominations, those who need to have
their blood shed, for water will not do, their sins are too deep a dye … I
believe that there are a great many; and if they are covenant breakers we need a
place designated, where we can shed their blood … Brethren and sisters, we want
you to repent and forsake your sins. And you who have committed sins that cannot
be forgiven through baptism, let your blood be shed, and let the smoke ascend,
that the incense thereof may come up before God as an atonement for your sins,
and that the sinners in Zion may be afraid.”

Apostle Jebediah M. Grant – 2nd counselor to Brigham Young, Journal of
Discourses, vol.4, pp.49-51

 



Joseph Fielding Smith



“Certain sins are so grievous that man may commit, that the blood of Christ will
not cleanse them from their sins even though they repent. Therefore their only
hope is to have their blood shed to atone, as far as possible, in their behalf.
This is scriptural doctrine, and is taught in all the standard works of the
Church.”

Joseph Fielding Smith – Doctrines of Salvation, 1954, vol.1, pp.135 136

 

 

This is horrifying! Lives have been taken under the direction of the Church and
in the name of the Lord. Does merely claiming divine authority give someone a
free pass to murder? If so, many terrorist organisations around the world that
commit horrific acts in the name of God should also get a free pass. Should we
feel that the Prophet Brigham Young and the early saints are justified for their
actions? Imagine if Thomas S. Monson were to preach this at general conference
and task local authorities to follow through with this council. It is obvious
why the Church would not want this part of the history to become common
knowledge. Does this practice sound like it was truly the will of a loving
Heavenly Father?






 


 


CHAPTER 10


 PROPHESIES


Ch. 10


While reading through History of the Church, Journal of Discourses, books by
past prophets and historical Mormon periodicals, I would occasionally come
across prophesies that didn’t quite make sense.



Joseph Smith – Prophesying the years of his death and Jesus’ 2nd coming.



“There are those of the rising generation who shall not taste death till Christ
comes… I was once praying earnestly upon this subject, and a voice said unto me,
“My son, if thou livest until thou art eighty-five years of age, thou shalt see
the face of the Son of Man.” I prophesy in the name of the Lord God, and let it
be written—the Son of Man will not come in the clouds of heaven till I am
eighty-five years old. Then read the 14th chapter of Revelation, 6th and 7th
verses—”And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the
everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every
nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people, saying with a loud voice, Fear God
and give glory to Him, for the hour of His judgment is come.” And Hosea, 6th
chapter, After two days, etc.,—2,520 years; which brings it to 1890.”

Joseph Smith – History of the Church, vol.5, p.336



Joseph’s prophecy was mistaken in two ways: he did not live to be 85 years old
and Jesus did not return in 1890.

 

 

Joseph Smith – Prophesying that moon is inhabited



Prominent early saint, Elder Oliver B. Huntington, lived with Joseph Smith in
Kirtland, OH and served four missions for the Church. He wrote an article for
The Young Woman’s Journal, the official magazine for the Young Ladies Mutual
Improvement Association of the Church, recounting a teaching by Joseph Smith.



“Nearly all the discoveries of men in the last half century have… contributed to
prove Joseph Smith to be a prophet. As far back as 1837, I know that he said the
moon was inhabited by men and women the same as this earth, and that they live
to a greater age than we do – that they live generally to near the age of a
1,000 years. He described the men as averaging near six feet in height, and
dressing quite uniformly in something near the Quaker style.”

Oliver B. Huntington – The Young Woman’s Journal, vol. 03, no.6, March 1892.
Contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/YWJ/id/11651



Joseph Smith - Revelation that the Book of Mormon copyright is to be sold.



"Wherefore be diligent in securing the copyright of my work upon all the face of
the Earth of which is known by you unto, my Servant Joseph, and unto him whom he
willeth according as I shall command him that the faithful and the righteous may
retain the temporal blessing... Behold I say unto you that I have covenanted
and it pleaseth me that Oliver Cowdery Joseph Knight Hyram Page and Josiah
Stowel shall do my work in this thing yea even in securing the copyright
and they shall do it with an eye single to my Glory that it may be the means of
bringing souls unto me salvation through mine only Begotten." 

Joseph Smith - Joseph Smith Papers: A Revelation given to  Oliver Cowdery, Hiram
Page, 

Josiah Stowell, & Joseph Knight given at Manchester, Ontario County, NY.

Revelations and Translations: Manuscript Revelation Books, Pages 30-33





“Joseph looked into the hat in which he placed the stone, and received a
revelation that some of the brethren should go to Toronto, Canada, and that they
would sell the copyright of the Book of Mormon. Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery
went to Toronto on this mission, but they failed entirely to sell the copyright,
returning without any money. Joseph was at my father’s house when they returned.
I was there also, and am an eye witness to these facts. Jacob Whitmer and John
Whitmer were also present when Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery returned from
Canada. Well, we were all in great trouble; and we asked Joseph how it was that
he had received a revelation from the Lord for some brethren to go to Toronto
and sell the copyright, and the brethren had utterly failed in their
undertaking."

David Whitmer -  An Address to All Believers in Christ, 1887, p. 30-31

Brigham Young – Prophesying that sun is inhibated



So it is with regard to the inhabitants of the sun. Do you think it is
inhabited? I rather think it is. Do you think there is any life there? No
question of it; it was not made in vain. It was made to give light to those who
dwell upon it, and to other planets’ and so will this earth when it is
celestialized.”

Brigham Young – Journal of Discourses, vol.13, p.271

Joseph Fielding Smith – Prophesying the will never reach the moon



“We will never get a man into space. This earth is man’s sphere and it was never
intended that he should get away from it. The moon is a superior planet to the
earth and it was never intended that man should go there. You can write it down
in your books that this will never happen.”

Joseph Fielding Smith – Doctrines of

Salvation, 1954, vol.3, p.203

 

Just 15 years later on July 20, 1969, U.S. astronauts are the first men to walk
on the moon.


Part 2


PART 2


THE BOOK OF MORMON


 


CHAPTER 11


 DNA


Ch. 11


The Book of Mormon story begins with Lehi, an Israelite, who fled to the
Promised Land with his family and landed somewhere in Mesoamerica. Lehi’s
descendants grew into two large populations, the Lamanites and the Nephites. By
AD 385 the Lamanites had destroyed the Nephites and then grew to populate the
entire Americas. This unique claim lends itself perfectly to genetic testing.
Studies have been performed on the genetic history of Native Americans and the
resulting information reveals inconsistencies in The Book of Mormon narrative.
Covered in this chapter: the Church’s original claim, statements by LDS
scientists, genetic evidence, and the Church’s attempt to distance itself from
the original position.



ORIGINAL CLAIM



Over the years, prophets, apostles, and the missionary department have preached
an ancestral link between the ancient Hebrews and Native Americans.



“It is a record of God’s dealings with the ancient inhabitants of the Americas
and contains the fullness of the everlasting gospel. The record gives an account
of two great civilisations. One came from Jerusalem in 600 B.C., and afterward
separated into two nations, known as the Nephites and the Lamanites. The other
came much earlier when the Lord confounded the tongues at the Tower of Babel.
This group is known as the Jaredites. After thousands of years, all were
destroyed except the Lamanites, and they are the principal ancestors of the
American Indians.”

Book of Mormon – Introduction, 1981 edition

 

“Central America, or Guatemala, is situated north of the Isthmus of Darien and
once embraced by several hundred miles of territory from north to south. The
city of Zarahemla, burnt at the crucifixion of the Savior, and rebuilt
afterwards, stood up on this land as will be seen from the following words from
the Book of Alma: ‘And now it was only the distance of a day and a half’s
journey for a Nephite, on the line Bountiful, and the land Desolation, from the
east to the west sea; and thus the land of Nephi, and the land of Zarahemla was
nearly surrounded by water: there being a small neck of land between the land
northward and the land southward.’”

Joseph Smith – Times and Seasons, October 1, 1842, vol.3, no.23

 

 

“As I look into your faces, I think of Father Lehi, whose sons and daughters you
are…. This is but the beginning of the work in Peru.”

Gordon B. Hinckley – God’s Holy Work in Peru, Ensign, February 1997, p.73








LDS SCIENTISTS

Simon G. Southerton – Senior molecular biologist with the Commonwealth
Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in Australia and former bishop.
Southerton said that genetic research allowed him to test his religious views
against his professional training. He examined studies of DNA lineages among
Polynesians and indigenous peoples in North, Central and South America. He
mapped maternal DNA lines from 7,300 Native Americans from 175 tribes.
Southerton found no trace ofMiddle Eastern DNA in the genetic strands of today’s
American Indians and Pacific Islanders. In Losing a Lost Tribe, published in
2004, Southerton concluded that the LDS church, his faith for 30 years, needed
to be reevaluated in the face of these facts.



“The problem is that the Church cannot acknowledge any factual errors in the
Book of Mormon because the prophet Joseph Smith proclaimed it the ‘most correct
of any book on Earth’ They can’t admit that it’s not historical. They would feel
that there would be a loss of members and loss in confidence in Joseph Smith as
a prophet.”

Simon G. Southerton – Bedrock of Faith is Jolted, Los Angeles Times, February
2006





Dr. Thomas W. Murphy – Chair of the Department of Anthropology at Edmonds
College.

 

“In March 2000 Scott Woodward, a professor of microbiology at Brigham Young
University, launched a multi-million dollar study … The Molecular Genealogy
Research Group (MGRG) compiled a database of DNA records that identified
connections between past and present humans…. Some optimism was expressed by
church members that such research would vindicate the Book of Mormon as an
ancient document…. For those who held such an expectation, the data collected by
MGRG and results of similar research projects have been disappointing. So far,
DNA has lent no support to the traditional Mormon beliefs about the origins of
the Native Americans. Instead, genetic data have confirmed that migrations from
Asia are the primary source of American Indian origins.” “Now that quantitative
scientific methods can indeed test for an Israelite genetic presence in ancient
America, we learn instead that virtually all Native Americans can trace their
lineages to the Asian migrations between 7,000 and 50,000 years ago. While
molecular anthropologists have the technological capability to identify
descendants of ancient Hebrews, no traces of such DNA markers have appeared in
Central America or elsewhere among Native Americans”

Thomas W. Murphy – Lamanite Genesis, Genealogy, and Genetics,
in American Apocrypha: Essays on the Book of Mormon, 2002





In collaboration – Thomas W. Murphy and Simon Southerton


 

“Investigation of mitochondrial DNA of more than 5,500 living Native Americans
reveals that 99.4% can be traced back to Asia primarily via maternal lineages
known as A, B, C, D and X. Only 0.6% came from Africa or Europe, most likely
after 1492. Lineages A through D are only found in Asia. While the X lineage
also is found in Europe and the Middle East, Asian and American lineages have
distinctive markers that indicate an ancient separation long before the events
described in the Book of Mormon. Similar results from nearly 1,000 paternal
lineages substantiate a Northeast Asian origin of American Indians. Likewise,
approximately 99% of the Polynesians surveyed to date can trace their maternal
lineages back to Southeast Asia. The other 1% almost certainly came from Europe
in the recent past… Folk biological claims of an Israelite ancestry, a curse
with a dark skin, and a whitening of dark-skinned Native American and Polynesian
Mormons fail to stand up to scrutiny among scientifically literate Latter-day
Saints.”

Thomas W. Murphy and Simon Southerton – Genetic Research a
‘Galileo Event’ for Mormons, Anthropology News, February 2003


 

Greater than 99% of the DNA lineages of Native Americans are only found among
East Asians. The evidence suggests that they share a common ancestor and that
American natives did not descend from Israeli lineage.



Jamie Hanis Handy – Brigham Young University, MS Biological Science and
Genetics.

 

“DNA is definitive. DNA is trusted. DNA is a part of our lives now. There is
nothing in which to be afraid. DNA is just information, lots of information…. In
my experience, each generation trusts and relies on DNA more than the previous
generation, and my children are growing up in a world where DNA just is and has
always been a wellspring of reliable information. Anything, any group, or any
organization that tries to discredit DNA as a legitimate data source will with
each passing year lose credibility with the rising generations. And so I am
very, very concerned about the faith that I call my spiritual home. The Church
of Jesus-Christ of Latter Day Saints.



This quote appears in the newest manual for seminary and institute students, “As
an example, you may want to explain that one way modern enemies of the Church
attempt to discredit the Book of Mormon is by using DNA evidence to try to
discredit any link between Book of Mormon peoples and Native Americans.” DNA
evidence has had a huge impact on the Mormon narrative. In my lifetime, a
one-word change in the introduction to our holy scripture, The Book of Mormon,
has had massive ripple effects while yet also remaining mostly undiscussed by
the membership at large. Originally the introduction read, ‘The Lamanites, and
they are the principal ancestors of the American Indians.’ The new introduction
reads much the same, but says the Lamanites ‘are among the ancestors of the
American Indians.’



How has this one word swap changed things? I was taught every week that the
Native Americans were the descendents of the Lamanites. I was shown pictures of
Mayan and Aztec ruins all the time as if those were evidence of the Book of
Mormon civilizations. Once DNA evidence began to show clearly that today’s
Native Americans did not descend from Middle Eastern Jews (as we originally
claimed), everything changed.



And yet, despite this drastic shift, we still insist on publishing something
that says “modern enemies” of the church use DNA evidence? … Our children will
not see DNA that way. Instead they will see the church as afraid — afraid of the
wonder and miracle that understanding DNA is. Afraid that truth cannot withstand
study. Afraid that (for many of them) the very thing that brought them to this
place, diagnosed their disease, treated their disorder, identified their parent,
captured their rapist, freed their friend, gave them a healthy sibling, and that
is trusted everywhere cannot be trusted at church?”

Jamie Hanis Handy – DNA and Mormonism, June 2015






 


DNA EVIDENCE



The international Human Genome Project (1990 – 2003) contributed to our insight
of human migratory patterns based on identifiable gene markers contained within
DNA. This was of particular interest to the Church for its insight into the
origin of Native Americans.



Virtually all mitochondrial DNA lineages found throughout the world can be
grouped into less than twenty-five major family groups represented by letters A,
B, C and so on. In the case of the native Americans, essentially all of their
lineages fall into one of five major families: A, B, C, D and X. Current genetic
and paleontological evidence indicates native Americans arrived from Asia.
Various groups of early travelers descend into the Americas between 15-35,000
years ago.They crossed the Bearing Straight land bridge between modern day
Russia and Alaska during the last ice age.


 

“Lying at the intersection of what is today Russia, Mongolia, China and
Kazakhstan, the region known as the Altai. The Altai region has played a
critical role in the peopling of northern Asia as an entry point into Siberia
and a possible homeland for ancestral Native Americans. It has an old and rich
history because humans have inhabited this area since the Paleolithic. To
untangle Altaian genetic histories, we analyzed mtDNA and Y chromosome variation
in northern and southern Altaian populations. Based on these data, we noted
differences in the origin and population history of Altaian ethnic groups.”



“Moreover, high-resolution analysis of Y chromosome haplogroup Q has allowed us
to reshape the phylogeny of this branch, making connections between populations
of the New World and Old World more apparent and demonstrating that southern
Altaians and Native Americans share a recent common ancestor. These results
greatly enhance our understanding of the peopling of Siberia and the Americas”.

Matthew C. Dulik, et al. -The American Journal of Human Genetics, February 10
2012, vol.90, issue 2, pp.229-246, in association with the University of
Pennsylvania and the American Society of Human Genetics.


 

 

DNA samples from every known tribe of Native Americans indicate an Asiatic,
rather than an Israeli origin.


 

 


DISTANCING FROM PAST CLAIMS

In light of DNA evidence disproving the Hebrew origins of the Native Americans,
the Church decided to amend the introduction to the Book of Mormon. The phrase
stating that the Lamanites are the “principal ancestors of the American Indians”
was changed in 2006 to now state that the Lamanites are “among the ancestors of
the American Indians”.

 

In a further attempt to reconcile the claims of the Book of Mormon with DNA
research, the Church published the article Book of Mormon and DNA Studies. The
article makes a few interesting statements.



“Although the primary purpose of the Book of Mormon is more spiritual than
historical…”

LDS.org/topics/book-of-mormon-and-dna-studies


 

Although its purpose may be spiritual, the claim that the Book of Mormon
contains the actual history of the Native Americans has always been one of the
foundations of the LDS church.



“The Book of Mormon itself, however, does not claim that the peoples it
describes were either the predominant or the exclusive inhabitants of the lands
they occupied.”

LDS.org/topics/book-of-mormon-and-dna-studies


 

Both the Book of Mormon and Joseph Smith actually do state that the
Lamanites/American Indians are the exclusive and predominant inhabitants.


 

2 Nephi 1:9
“Wherefore, I, Lehi, have obtained a promise, that inasmuch as those whom the
 Lord God shall bring out of the land of Jerusalem shall keep his commandments,
they shall prosper upon the face of this land; and they shall be kept from all
other nations, that they may possess this land unto themselves.  And if it so be
that they shall keep his commandments they shall be blessed upon the face of
this land, and there shall be none to molest them, nor to take away the land of
their inheritance; and they shall dwell safely forever.”


 

“the history of ancient America is unfolded, from its first settlement by a
colony that came from the Tower of Babel…The principal nation of the second race
fell in battle towards the close of the fourth century. The remnant are the
Indians that now inhabit this country.”

Joseph Smith – The Went Worth Letter.
LDS.org/ensign/2002/07/the-wentworth-letter?lang=eng


 

The essay then states,



“Nothing is known about the DNA of Book of Mormon peoples”

LDS.org/topics/book-of-mormon-and-dna-studies


 

This is incorrect. According to the Book of Mormon, the genetic lineage of the
Lamanites is exactly known.


 

1Nephi 5:14
“And it came to pass that my father, Lehi, also found upon the plates of brass a
genealogy of his fathers; wherefore he knew that he was a descendant of Joseph;
yea, even that Joseph who was the son of Jacob, who was sold into Egypt, and who
was preserved by the hand of the Lord, that he might preserve his father, Jacob,
and all his household from perishing with famine.”


 

Who was “Joseph who was sold into Egypt…son of Jacob”? He is the same Joseph who
was the son of Jacob who was the son of Isaac who was the son of Abraham. In
Jewish tradition, Abraham is called Avraham Avinu, “Our father Abraham,”
signifying that he is both the biological ancestor of the Jews and the father of
Judaism, the first Jew. As Lehi, being descended from Joseph and Abraham, it
indeed gives the Church exact knowledge of the DNA of the Nephites and
Lamanites; yet we find no Israelite gene markers in Native American DNA.


 

“If it were known with a high degree of certainty that the emigrants described
in the Book of Mormon had what might be considered typically Near Eastern DNA
[Middle Eastern/Jewish], it is quite possible that their DNA markers did not
survive the intervening centuries.”

LDS.org/topics/book-of-mormon-and-dna-studies


 

According to the Book of Mormon, the DNA Studies article is again mistaken.


 

1Nephi 13:30
“Nevertheless, thou beholdest that the Gentiles who have gone forth out of
captivity, and have been lifted up by the power of God above all other nations,
 upon the face of the land which is choice above all other lands, which is the
land that the Lord God hath covenanted with thy father that his seed should have
for the land of their inheritance; wherefore, thou seest that the Lord God will
not suffer that the Gentiles will utterly destroy the mixture of thy seed, which
are among thy brethren.”


 

In what way is it possible that “their DNA markers did not survive the
intervening centuries”? Native Americans did survive. Joseph Smith specifically
named the Lamanites as the ancestors of the Native Americans.



“[The Book of Mormon] records that America in ancient times has been inhabited
by two distinct races of people. The first were called the Jaredites and came
directly from the Tower of Babel…. The principal nation of the second race fell
in battle towards the close of the fourth century. The remnant are the Indians
that now inhabit this country.”

Joseph Smith – The Wentworth Letter, March 1, 1842. Ensign July 2002


 

 

Considering that Joseph Smith presented a claim to the origin of Native
Americans that is evidently not true, and that the Church has recently made
attempts to distance itself from that claim, it seems increasingly difficult to
feel confident in Joseph’s prophetic abilities.











 


CHAPTER 12


REFORMED EGYPTIAN 


Ch. 12


The Salt Lake temple Visitors’ Center portays the prophet Mormon as a
Mesoamerican native that is dressed in traditional Mayan clothing. It also
depicts stylized Mayan hieroglyphs on the walls and papers.



The Church teaches that the civilizations of the Book of Mormon wrote in a
language called “reformed Egyptian”. This writing system is completely unique to
the Book of Mormon people. Issues surrounding the existence of reformed Egyptian
include the Church’s claims, examples of Native American writings, the Anthon
transcript, and the lack of archeological evidence.




THE CHURCH’S CLAIMS




Mormon 9:32

“And now, behold, we have written this record according to our knowledge, in the
characters which are called among us the reformed Egyptian, being handed  down
and altered by us, according to our manner of speech.”

 

“Joseph Smith did translate the Book of Mormon from ancient plates of gold,
which were written with engraved characters in the reformed Egyptian language.”

James E. Faust – The Expanding Inheritance from Joseph Smith

October 1982 General Conference



 

“A Lamanite is a descendant of one Lehi who left Jerusalem six hundred years
before Christ and with his family crossed the mighty deep and landed in America.
And Lehi and his family became the ancestors of all of the Indian and Mestizo
tribes in North and South and Central America and in the islands of the sea, for
in the middle of their history there were those who left America in ships of
their making and went to the islands of the sea.”

Spencer W. Kimball – April, 1971




 

Since President Spencer W. Kimball said the Lamanites became the ancestors of
all natives in North and South and Central America and in the islands of the
sea, we should expect to find reformed Egyptian spanning both continents and all
of Polynesia.






NATIVE AMERICAN WRITING

While indigenous groups of the New World used a rich array of languages, formal
writing systems did not exist in North America, South America and the Pacific
Islands before contact with European explorers and missionaries. North American
natives used a series of symbols for crude communication, South American natives
used a system of rope knotting only for accounting purposes, and Polynesians
used a series of symbols in traditional tattooing. But it was the Mesoamerican
civilizations, located in Central America, that were the only cultures to invent
and use an extensive and detailed writing system.



The earliest inscriptions date to about 900 B.C. and continued in use until the
Spanish conquest in the 16th and 17th centuries. Maya texts have survived on
stone, bone, shell, pottery, wood, and paper. Since it was the only one formal
writing system during the time of the Book of Mormon, Mayan hieroglyphs should
be the “reformed Egyptian” written on the Gold Plates. Did Joseph leave any
examples of reformed Egyptian to compare?




EXAMPLES

Luckily, there exists 3 transcribed examples of reformed Egyptian.



The Anthon Transcript - "Caractors" doctument – This is the most extensive
transcript of Reformed Egyptian characters. 

David Whitmer, who eventually owned this document, claimed that it was the same
one Martin Harris showed to scholars in 

New York in early 1828.



Before Martin Harris was to mortgage his farm to finance the printing of the
Book of Mormon, he made an attempt to verify its authenticity. Martin had Joseph
transcribe some characters from the Book of Mormon and took it to visit Charles
Anthon, professor of classical linguistics at Columbia University. Martin Harris
claims to have received verification on the authenticity of the characters (even
though no record exists), but when Professor Anthon later learns of Martin’s
claim, he writes to newspaper editor, E.D. Howe, stating the following,


 

“The whole story about my having pronounced the Mormonite inscription to be
‘reformed Egyptian hieroglyphics’ is perfectly false. … The farmer [Martin
Harris] added, that he had been requested to contribute a sum of money towards
the publication of the “golden book,”… So urgent had been these solicitations
that he intended selling his farm and handing over the amount received to those
who wished to publish the plates. As a last precautionary step, however, he had
resolved to come to New York, and obtain the opinion of the learned about the
meaning of the paper which he brought with him, and which had been given him as
a part of the contents of the book, although no translation had been furnished
at the time by the young man with the spectacles. On hearing this odd story… I
began to regard it as part of a scheme to cheat the farmer of his money, and I
communicated my suspicions to him, warning him to beware of rogues. He requested
an opinion from me in writing, which of course I declined giving, and he then
took his leave carrying the paper with him.”

Professor Charles Anthon – Letter to E.B. Howe, February 17, 1834


 

Oliver Cowdery – Both Oliver and Fredrick G. Williams copy the same characters
of the Book of Mormon.



Fredrick G. Williams – “Characters on the Book of Mormon” taken April 11, 1864.



Since Mayan hieroglyphics were the only formal writing system throughout all of
the Americas and Pacific Islands, we should find similarities when comparing
them with reformed Egyptian. However, the characters do not appear to bear any
resemblance.

 

Surprisingly, the reformed Egyptian characters contained in the Anthon
transcript appear to contain the entire English alphabet and numeric system.




LACK OF EVIDENCE

The idea of a reformed Egyptian writing system simply does not hold up to
scholarly scrutiny. No formally trained archaeologist, anthropologist, or
linguist, not employed by the Church, has ever recognized the characters of
reformed Egyptian as a legitimate language and writing system that is backed by
evidence.



“Outside of Mormon scholars, there is not any recognition of or belief in a
“reformed egyptian” script or language. The photos of so called “reformed
Egyptian” documents that I have seen do not resemble genuine Egyptian scripts of
any kind from any period of Egypt’s long pharaonic history including both
hieroglyphic forms or the more cursive forms known as hieratic and demotic. They
look like a modern person’s attempt at making cryptogramatic symbols of a
modernly invented secret code in that they resemble nonsense “letters” of an
alphabet rather than pictorial symbols like hieroglyphs or even the much more
varied and differently shaped ligatures of hieratic or demotic Egyptian cursive
writing.”

Peter Brand – Professor of Ancient History and Egyptology, University of Toronto




 

The Church claims that Lehi’s family used a writing system called ‘reformed
Egyptian’ and after the destruction of the Nephites, the Lamanites are supposed
to have taken this system and spread throughout both American continents and the
Pacific Islands. Although the many indigenous cultures used rich languages, no
formal writing system capable of taking detailed records existed anywhere but in
Mesoamerica. Unfortunately, due to the transcriptions we have, reformed Egyptian
characters do not resemble Mayan hieroglyphs at all, but actually appear to be
stylized English characters.

 


 


 


CHAPTER 13


 ANACHRONISMS


Ch. 13


Anachronism- a·nach·ro·nism: an act of attributing a custom, event, or object to
a period to which it does not belong.



An anachronism is when an author takes something from their time period and
inserts it in a past time period where it doesn’t belong. For example, William
Shakespeare wrote in his play, Julius Caesar, that Cassius states, “The clock
has stricken three.” The problem is that the plot takes place in 44 B.C., a time
period where mechanical clocks had not yet been invented. Shakespeare took
something familiar to him and placed it where it doesn’t historically belong.
Because the play is fictional, it is simply a mistake. However, if Shakespeare
were to claim that he had found an ancient document from 44 B.C. that mentions
the action of a mechanical clock, it would clearly be seen as a forgery because
of the anachronism.



The Book of Mormon time period covers 2,200 B.C. – 400 A.D., and also contains
similar anachronisms.


NON-INDIGENOUS ANIMALS

Elephants



Ether 9:19

19 And they also had horses, and asses, and there were elephants and cureloms
and cumoms;


 

Elephants, mastodons and mammoths evolved from a common ancestor about 10-20
millions years ago. While elephants stayed in Africa and Asia, mastodons and
mammoths migrated into America across the Bering Strait during the last Ice Age.
Mastodons and mammoths were hunted to extinction during the Pleistocene era,
about 11 thousand years ago. While the fossil record shows contact early humans,
these animals disappeared thousands of years before any people from the Book of
Mormon reach the Americas.


 

Live Stock



Ether 9:18

18 And also all manner of cattle, of oxen, and cows, and of sheep, and of swine,
and of goats, and also many other kinds of animals which were useful for the
food of man.


 

Livestock are domesticated animals raised in an agricultural setting for food.
The last known cattle species in the Americas went extinct around the same time
as mastodons and mammoths 11 thousands years ago . Although wild big horn sheep,
mountain goats and boars are native to some areas in North America, there is no
evidence of domesticated sheep, pigs and goats used as livestock anywhere in the
Americas. Domestication began with the arrival of relatives of these animals
 with the Europeans in the 15th century.

 

 

Honey Bees




Ether 2:3

…did also carry with them deseret, which, by interpretation, is a honey bee; and
thus they did carry with them swarms of bees…


 

There were no honeybees in the Americas before its introduction from Europe in
the 15th century. Subspecies were also introduced from Italy in 1859, and later
from Spain and Portugal.

 

 

Horses



3 Nephi 3:22

And it came to pass in the seventeenth year, in the latter end of the year, the
proclamation of Lachoneus had gone forth throughout all the face of the land,
and they had taken their horses, and their chariots…


 

Indigenous North American horses were also part of the great extinction of the
Pleistocene era. Despite extensive archaeology, not a single bone or tooth from
this animal has ever been discovered in the Mesoamerican region. Maya, Aztec and
Olmec cultures depicted many native animals in art and ideology but have never
depicted a horse on any temples, carvings or paintings.

It would easy for New Englanders to assume that horses have always been part of
the American landscape because the Native Americans they encountered rode
horses. What was unknown to East coast Americans at that time was that Native
Americans had domesticated the feral horses that ran away from the West Coast
Spaniards; who in turn, reintroduced horses into the Americas by bringing
European breeds with the arrival of Columbus.


 


 


TECHNOLOGY

Wheeled Transport Vehicles




Alma 20:6

Now when Lamoni had heard this he caused that his servants should make ready his
horses and his chariots.


 

Used in conjunction with horses were chariots. Chariots have wheels, however the
wheel as a technology was not found in ancient America. Like many new things, it
was brought over with European settlers. The curator of ethnography at the
American Museum of Natural History states,


 

“We see that the prevailing mode of land transport in the New World was by human
carrier. The wheel was unknown in pre-Columbian times.”

Clark Wissler – The American Indian:

An Introduction to the Anthropology

of the New World. Oxford University Press


 

The military and transport advantages would have spread the wheel through the
native populations as it did through Europe and Asia. If horses were actually
domesticated and wheeled transport was used, Archaeologists would also find
chariots throughout the Western Hemisphere, however there has never been a
single horse, chariot, or wheeled transport artifact discovered from
pre-Columbian America to indicate that chariots ever existed in the New World.


 


 


METALLURGY

Metal Working




2 Nephi 5:15

And I did teach my people to build buildings, and to work in all manner of wood,
and of iron, and of copper, and of brass, and of steel, and of gold, and of
silver, and of precious ores, which were in great abundance


 

Much like the invention of the wheel, the military and infrastructure advantages
of steel would have seen widespread adoption in the Americas. Furthermore, mass
production of steel weaponry for such large-scale wars as depicted in the Book
of Mormon, would have required large iron and steel forges. These would have
left evidence of slag, remnants of ore and stock piles of steel weaponry. The
spreading of this technology, as it provides many significant advantages, would
make steel a very common archaeological finding, however there is no evidence of
this. There is simply no record of steel or iron having ever been smelted in the
New World.

 

 

Coins




“One possible purpose for the inclusion of the Nephite coinage in Alma 11 is to
demonstrate the extent of the bribe Zeezrom offered if Amulek…”

Book of MormonStudent Manual, 2009, pp. 184-90

 

“How Valuable Were the Nephite Pieces of Money? …the relative value of silver
and gold coins under the system set up by Mosiah”

Book of Mormon Student Manual, 1979, p.229










Agricultural food crops were used as the common form of currency, especially
cacao. Coinage was not present in the Americas prior to the May 11, 1535 decree
of Doña Juana de Castilla, Queen of the Castilla region in Spain, authorizing
the minting of silver and copper coins in Mexico. Coinage in the Western
Hemisphere during the Book of Mormon time period was unknown. Coins were
introduced more than a thousand years after the conclusion of the Book of
Mormon.

 

It is evident that the Church became aware of this discrepancy when it made
these revisions with regards to nephite coinage.



Beginning in 1492, European explorers brought new animals, plants, technology,
theology and disease to the Americas, yet many of these items described in the
Book of Mormon simply did not exist during its timeline. If Joseph Smith was
given the Book of Mormon translation word-for-word by the power of God, then it
should not contain these significant errors.

 








CHAPTER 14


THE JAREDITES


Ch. 14


The Book of Ether, contained in the Book of Mormon, tells the story of the
Jaredites. They were a vast civilization of people who were completely wiped out
before the arrival of Lehi and his family to the Promised Land. The Jaredites
narrative contains two major issues: first, a year-long oceanic journey to the
Americas, and second, a final battle at the Hill Cumorah where millions of
people perished.


 


YEAR-LONG VOYAGE BY SEA



This transatlantic journey taken by the Jaredites presents major problems. Let’s
look at the number of passengers, dimensions of the barges, and the basic
necessities needed.


 


NUMBERS OF PASSANGERS


 

Ether 6:14-16

And Jared had four sons;

And the brother of Jared also begat sons and daughters.

And the friends of Jared and his brother were in number about twenty and two
souls; and they also begat sons and daughters before they came to the promised
land.


 

The plural “sons and daughters” means at least 2 of each. Jared + 4 sons + his
brother + his sons and daughters (at least 4) + 22 people + their families. 11
couples that had children before leaving on the trip; assume 4 per family. We
are looking at approximately 74 people.


 


DIMENSIONS OF THE BARGES


 

Ether 2:16-17,20

And the Lord said: Go to work and build, after the manner of barges which ye
have hitherto built. And it came to pass that the brother of Jared did go to
work, and also his brethren, and built barges after the manner in which they had
built, according to the instructions of the Lord. And they were small, and they
were light upon the water, even like unto the lightness of a fowl upon the
water.

And they were built after a manner that they were exceedingly tight, even that
they would hold water like unto a dish; and the bottom thereof was tight like
unto a dish; and the sides thereof were tight like unto a dish; and the ends
thereof were peaked; and the top thereof was tight like unto a dish; and the
length thereof was the length of a tree; and the door thereof, when it was shut,
was tight like unto a dish.

And the Lord said unto the brother of Jared: Behold, thou shalt make a hole in
the top, and also in the bottom; and when thou shalt suffer for air thou shalt
unstop the hole and receive air. And if it be so that the water come in upon
thee, behold, ye shall stop the hole, that ye may not perish in the flood.


 

 * Not huge ships – “And they were small…”

 * They floated – “…like unto the lightness of a fowl upon the water.”

 * About the “length of a tree” – Ether begins in Babylon, Mesopotamia, or
   modern-day Hillah, Iraq. Even though most trees average much shorter, the
   largest indigenous tree in the region is the Date Palm tree (Phoenix
   dactylifera), which grows 70–75 ft in height.

 * Water tight – The bottom, sides and top “were tight like unto a dish.”

 * Air tight with holes on top and bottom so it would float when upside-down. –
   “a hole in the top, and also in the bottom”


 


BASIC NECESSITIES NEEDED


 

Ether 3:1, 6:4,11

And it came to pass that the brother of Jared, now the number of the vessels
which had been prepared was eight, went forth unto the mount…

And it came to pass that when they had prepared all manner of food, that thereby
they might subsist upon the water, and also food for their flocks and herds, and
whatsoever beast or animal or fowl that they should carry with them—and it came
to pass that when they had done all these things they got aboard of their
vessels or barges, and set forth into the sea, commending themselves unto the
Lord their God.

And thus they were driven forth, three hundred and forty and four days upon the
water.


 

Drinkable Water

How much water would 74+ people and animals need to survive for 344 days?
Divided into 8 barges, that puts almost 10 people per barge. Humans need approx
1 gallon per person per day for consumption and sanitation (www.ready.gov
/water). That’s about 3,440 gallons per barge. They also brought flocks and
herds. There are a minimum of 3 animals to a flock or herd, assume 1 flock and 1
herd per barge. Sheep drink about 1 gallon of water per day and cows drink about
10 gallons. (www.ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/ansci/livestoc/as1763.pdf) They would drink
about 1,032 and 10,320 gallons during the trip. That comes to a total of about
14,792 gallons. Just for comparison’s sake, here is a 15,000 gallon tank.



How would they store that much fresh water in a boat that was, at most, 75 feet
long? Remember, this was supposed to be 2,500 – 2,200 B.C. and any tossing in
the ocean would dump out any pottery, barrels, bowls or animal skinned bags used
to contain the water. Any leaks would drown the passengers. That’s just water.



Food Storage

Adults need approx. 2,500 calories a day even for a sedentary lifestyle.
(Medicalnewstoday.com/articles/

219305.php) Today’s caloric dense convenient food covers those calories in
relatively small portions, but in 2,200 B.C., only very basic foods existed:
grains, vegetables, nuts and meat. Larger portions of these foods need to be
consumed to meet the daily caloric requirements; about 4 lbs a day.
(www.precisionnutrition.com/what-are-your-4-lbs) Ten people in each barge would
require about 13,760 lbs of food for the 344 day voyage. Small sheep require
about 2 lbs of feed a day and small cows require about 10 lbs of feed a day.
(http://www.ag.auburn.edu/~chibale/an16sheepfeeding.pdf) and
(http://beef.unl.edu/cattleproduction/ forageconsumed-day) For 10 people, 3
sheep and 3 cows, that makes about 26,144 lbs of food in total. For comparison,
that’s about 2 adult African elephants. 1 train car worth of water + 2 elephants
worth of food do not fit in one 75 ft (at most) barge, that also needed to float
and was built with ancient materials and techniques.



Preservation

Aside from the enormous space requirements, the lack of refrigeration or ability
to make fires inside an enclosed wooden boat becomes the larger issue. Any
grains, dried fruits and vegetables would quickly spoil in the dark, humid
environment.



Sanitation

The Book of Ether mentions that in addition to their flocks and herds that the
Jaredites “did also lay snares and catch fowls of the air … and did carry with
them the fish of the waters … and whatsoever beast or animal or fowl that they
should carry with them.” Since additional animals were likely brought along for
food, what would happen to a year’s worth of butchery and human and animal waste
without adequate sanitation? This would guarantee rotting, fecal contamination
and the spreading of deadly bacteria and parasites.






LARGE SCALE MILITARY CASUALTIES



In addition to the logistical issues surrounding the trip, the 2nd major problem
with the Jaredite story involves large-scale casualties.



“Cumorah is the hill and area recorded in the Book of Mormon where the Nephites
and Lamanites fought a final battle in which the Nephite people were
annihilated. Moroni reported that Cumorah was also the site where the Jaredites
were earlier destroyed.”

The Hill Cumorah – https://history.lds.org/media/40-hill-cumorah?lang=eng#1




The Book of Mormon chronicles two civilization-ending wars: first the Jaredites,
then the Nephites.

 

The Jaredites

Ether 15, chapter heading.

“Millions of the Jaredites are slain in battle—Shiz and Coriantumr assemble all
the people to mortal combat—The Spirit of the Lord ceases to strive with
them—The Jaredite nation is utterly destroyed…”




The Nephites

Mormon 6, chapter heading.

“The Nephites gather to the land of Cumorah for the final battles—Mormon hides
the sacred records in the hill Cumorah—The Lamanites are victorious, and the
Nephite nation is destroyed—Hundreds of thousands are slain with the sword.
About A.D. 385.”



Both great battles took place on the same Hill Cumoroh near Joseph Smith’s home
in upstate New York.


 

“The great and last battle, in which several hundred thousand Nephites perished
was on the hill Cumorah, the same hill from which the plates were taken by
Joseph Smith”

Orson Pratt – Journal of Discourses, February 11, 1872, vol. 14, p. 331



“In our era, the Hill Cumorah is a drumlin hill between the towns of Palmyra and
Manchester, New York, where the gold plates of the Book of Mormon, deposited by
an ancient religious leader in a stone box, was unearthed, translated by the
American Prophet, Joseph Smith Jr., and published in 1830. In 1928 the LDS
Church purchased the site and in 1935 erected a monument commemorating the visit
of the Angel Moroni. Later, the Church built a visitors center at the base of
the hill. Since 1937, the Church has produced the annual outdoor Cumorah Pagent.
This image looking southwest a century ago, was taken when the hill was less
wooded than today.

The Hill Cumorah – History.lds.org/

media/40-hill-cumorah?lang=eng#1



The last Nephite battle had casualties in the hundreds of thousands as recently
as 385  A.D., only 1,630 years ago. But the largest battle, in Ether, recounts
casualties of at least 2 million people. For perspective, this is an image of
1.6 million people at a meeting in Nigeria to address global poverty. In
contrast, the Hill Cumorah near Palmyra, New York occupies less than half a
square mile and is only 110 feet tall. This tiny hill is supposed to contain the
bodies, weapons and armor of nearly 3 million soldiers, yet to this day not a
single remain has ever been found. Does that seem possible?



Dr. John E. Clark, professor of Archaeology at BYU, comments on the Book of
Mormon’s archaeological remains in the Hill Cumorah.



“If any place merits archaeological attention, it is Cumorah. The very word
elicits a series of empirical questions that can only be addressed through
archaeology. When we pay attention to time and to cultural context, it becomes
clear that the events described in the Book of Mormon did not occur in New York.
In accord with these general observations about New York and Pennsylvania, we
come to our principal object— the Hill Cumorah. Archaeologically speaking, it is
a clean hill. No artifacts, no walls, no trenches, no arrowheads. The area
immediately surrounding the hill is similarly clean. Pre-Columbian people did
not settle or build here. This is not the place of Mormon’s last stand. We must
look elsewhere for that hill.”

John E. Clark – Archaeology and Cumorah Questions, Journal of Mormon Studies,
2004.
http://publications.mi.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1412&index=15




 

Dr. Clark admits that the Jaredites were never part of any mass-extinction on
the Hill Cumorah. This fact, along with the impossible type of transatlantic
voyage as described in the Book of Mormon, both point to the conclusion that the
Jaredite story did not occur.


 


 


 


CHAPTER 15


 SOURCE MATERIAL


Ch. 15


Was Joseph Smith capable of writing the Book of Mormon himself? Could there be
other sources for its language, themes, stories and characters? President of the
Quorum of the Seventy, Brigham H. Roberts, spoke about Joseph’s incredible mind.

 

“In light of this evidence, there can be no doubt as to the possession of a
vividly strong, creative imagination by Joseph Smith the Prophet, an
imagination, it could with reason be urged, which, given the suggestions that
are found in the ‘common knowledge’  of accepted American antiquities of the
times, supplemented by such a work as Ethan Smith’s View of the Hebrews
[published in Palmyra in 1825], it would make it possible for him to create a
book such as the Book of Mormon is.”

B.H. Roberts – Studies of the Book of Mormon, p. 250


 

Elder Roberts says that there is “no doubt” that Joseph could have written the
Book of  Mormon with influences from a book called, View of the Hebrews, among
other contemporary sources. What contemporary sources could have inspired the
stories of the Book of Mormon?



This chapter examines several of these sources such as: Joseph Senior’s dream of
The Tree of Life, the book “View of the Hebrews”, the book “The Late War”,
Palmyra’s Methodist revival meeting, “The First Book of Napoleon”, tales of
Captain Kidd, the Apocrypha, and the King James Bible.




THE TREE OF LIFE



Lehi’s vision of the Tree of Life is among the most well known Book of Mormon
stories. From childhood members are taught that a man named Lehi had a dream
about a tree, fruit that made you happy, the iron rod and a great and spacious
building.




 

Lehi’s Dream


 

Nephi 8: 5,9-13,19,20,26,27

And it came to pass that I saw a man, and he was dressed in a white robe; and he
came and stood before me.

And it came to pass after I had prayed unto the Lord I beheld a large and
spacious field.

And it came to pass that I beheld a tree, whose fruit was desirable to make one
happy.

And it came to pass that I did go forth and partake of the fruit thereof; and I
beheld that it was most sweet, above all that I ever before tasted. Yea, and I
beheld that the fruit thereof was white, to exceed all the whiteness that I had
ever seen.

And as I partook of the fruit thereof it filled my soul with exceedingly great
joy; wherefore, I began to be desirous that my family should partake of it also;
for I knew that it was desirable above all other fruit.

And as I cast my eyes round about, that perhaps I might discover my family also,
I beheld a river of water; and it ran along, and it was near the tree of which I
was partaking the fruit.

And I beheld a rod of iron, and it extended along the bank of the river, and led
to the tree by which I stood.

And I also beheld a strait and narrow path, which came along by the rod of iron,

And I also cast my eyes round about, and beheld, on the other side of the river
of water, a great and spacious building; and it stood as it were in the air,
high above the earth.

And it was filled with people, both old and young, both male and female; and
their manner of dress was exceedingly fine; and they were in the attitude of
mocking and pointing their fingers towards those who had come at and were
partaking of the fruit.


 

Joseph Smith Sr.’s Dream


 

What members are never taught is that Joseph Smith’s father was the originator
of this dream and that the Smith family was familiar with its story. Shortly
after his death, Joseph Smith’s mother, Lucy Mack Smith, wrote her family’s
story focusing on her son Joseph Jr. In her book she recounts the dream her
husband experienced that was so profound he had to share it with his family.

 

“In the meantime we had a son, whom we called Joseph, after his father; he was
born December 23, 1805. In 1811, we moved from Royalton, Vermont, to the town of
Lebanon, New Hampshire. Soon after arriving here, my husband [Joseph Smith Sr.]
received another very singular vision, which I will relate:



“I thought, I was traveling in an open, desolate field, which appeared to be
very barren. As I was thus traveling, the thought suddenly came into my mind
that I had better stop and reflect upon what I was doing, before I went any
further. So I asked myself, ‘What motive can I have in traveling here, and what
place can this be?’ My guide, who was by my side, as before, said, ‘This is the
desolate world; but travel on.’ The road was so broad and barren that I wondered
why I should travel in it; for, said I to myself, ‘Broad is the road, and wide
is the gate that leads to death, and many there be that walk therein; but narrow
is the way, and straight is the gate that leads to everlasting’ life, and few
there be that go in thereat.”



“Traveling a short distance farther, I came to a narrow path. This path I
entered, and, when I had traveled a little way in it, I beheld a beautiful
stream of water, which ran from the east to the west. Of this stream I could see
neither the source nor yet the termination; but as far as my eyes could extend I
could see a rope running along the bank of it, about as high as a man could
reach, and beyond me was a low, but very pleasant valley, in which stood a tree
such as I had never seen before. It was exceedingly handsome, insomuch that I
looked upon it with wonder and admiration. Its beautiful branches spread
themselves somewhat like an umbrella, and it bore a kind of fruit, in shape much
like a chestnut bur, and as white as snow, or, if possible whiter. I gazed upon
the same with considerable interest, and as I was doing so the burs or shells
commenced opening and shedding their particles, or the fruit which they
contained, which was of dazzling whiteness. I drew near and began to eat of it,
and I found it delicious beyond description. As I was eating, I said in my
heart, ‘I can not eat this alone, I must bring my wife and children, that they
may partake with me.’ Accordingly, I went and brought my family, which consisted
of a wife and seven children, and we all commenced eating, and praising God for
this blessing. We were exceedingly happy, insomuch that our joy could not easily
be expressed.”



“While thus engaged, I beheld a spacious building standing opposite the valley
which we were in, and it appeared to reach to the very heavens. It was full of
doors and windows, and they were filled with people, who were very finely
dressed. When these people observed us in the low valley, under the tree, they
pointed the finger of scorn at us, and treated us with all manner of disrespect
and contempt. But their contumely we utterly disregarded. I presently turned to
my guide, and inquired of him the meaning of the fruit that was so delicious. He
told me it was the pure love of God, shed abroad in the hearts of all those who
love him, and keep his commandments. He then commanded me to go and bring the
rest of my children. I told him that we were all there. ‘No,’ he replied, ‘look
yonder, you have two more, and you must bring them also.’ Upon raising my eyes,
I saw two small children, standing some distance off. I immediately went to
them, and brought them to the tree; upon which they commenced eating with the
rest, and we all rejoiced together. The more we ate, the more we seemed to
desire, until we even got down upon our knees, and scooped it up, eating it by
double handfuls. After feasting in this manner a short time, I asked my guide
what was the meaning of the spacious building, which I saw. He replied, ‘It is
Babylon, it is Babylon, and it must fall. The people in the doors and windows
are the inhabitants thereof, who scorn and despise the Saints of God because of
their humility.’ I soon awoke, clapping my hands together for joy.”

Lucy Mack Smith – Biographical Sketches of Joseph Smith the Prophet, and His
Progenitors
for Many Generations, Harold B. Lee Library, BYU, March 2004





Joseph Smith Sr.’s dream is nearly identical with Lehi’s vision of the Tree of
Life.







Growing up hearing this story surely made Joseph very familiar with it. All it
would take to turn his father’s story into his own would be the replacing the
rope for an iron rod. It is also interesting that Nephi recorded his father’s
dream in the gold plates much the same  way Joseph recorded his father’s dream
in the Book of Mormon.


 


VIEW OF THE HEBREWS

In 1823, Rev. Ethan Smith, working as a pastor in Poultney, Vermont, published
his book View of the Hebrews. At the time it was first published, Oliver Cowdery
was not only living in Poultney, Vermont, but was also a member of Ethan’s
Congregation.



After becoming acquainted, Oliver gave Joseph a copy of Ethan’s book. Joseph
liked it so much that later, as Editor in Chief of the Times and Seasons, he
reprinted selections from View of the Hebrews.



“In order to this, we shall here make an extract from an able work: written
exclusively on the subject of the Ten Tribes having come from Asia by the way of
Bherings Strait, by the Rev. Ethan Smith, Pultney, Vt.” “… an old Indian
informed him, that his fathers in this country had not long since, been in the
possession of a book, which they had for a long time, carried with them, but
having lost the knowledge of reading it, they buried it with an Indian chief.”

Joseph Smith – Times and Seasons, vol. 3, 1842, p.813. Quoting View of the
Hebrews, p.223



View of the Hebrews became a very popular book in the New England area. Its
story begins with the destruction of Jerusalem, much like the Book of Mormon. It
also mentions that Native Americans are descended from the Hebrews that traveled
to America and that once here, they separated into two factions: one civilized
and one savage and bloodthirsty. They also both had with many wars between them.
It also quotes heavily from Isaiah, and finally ends with the savage group
completely wiping out the civilized group.



Once Joseph finally published the Book of Mormon, President of the Quorum of the
Seventy, Brigham H. Roberts, noticed that its pages retold the same story as
View of the Hebrews.



This led Elder Roberts to deeply study the connection between the two books. The
results of his research were published a book titled, Studies of the Book of
Mormon. His book notes many similarities between the two.

 

Origin of the Inhabitants of North and South America

“It is often represented by Mormon speakers and writers, that the Book of Mormon
was first to represent the American Indians as descendants of the Hebrews,
holding that the Book of Mormon is unique in this. The claim is sometimes still
ignorantly made.”

B.H. Roberts – Studies of the Book of Mormon, p. 323


 

 

Prophets and apostles have claimed that the Book of Mormon is unique in
presenting the true history of the American Indians as descendants of Hebrews.
Elder Roberts notes that View of the Hebrews promoted this same claim when it
was published in 1823, 7 years before the Book of Mormon.

 

Destruction of Jerusalem

Roberts notes that the entire first chapter of View of the Hebrews describes the
siege of Jerusalem by the Romans. He compares this to the first chapters of the
Book of Mormon, in which Lehi prophesies of the destruction of Jerusalem.

 

The Hebrews Split into Two Nations: Civilized and Savages

“Israel brought into this new continent a considerable degree of civilization;
and the better part of them long laboured to maintain it. But others fell into
the hunting and consequently savage state; whose barbarous hordes invaded their
more civilized brethren, and eventually annihilated most of them, and all in
these northern regions!”

Ethan Smith – View of the Hebrews,1825


 

 

The Book of Mormon story also begins with Lehi and his family arrived in the New
World from Jerusalem and splitting into a civilized Nephite nation and a savage
Lamanite nation, with the Lamanites eventually wiping out the Nephites.

 

Stories of a Lost Book

An account is given in View of the Hebrews in which “an old Indian” stated that
his ancestors “had a book which they had for a long time preserved,” and that
eventually “they buried it with an Indian chief.” Elder Roberts parallels this
with the passing down of the gold plates that were finally buried by Moroni.

 

Quetzalcoatl

View of the Hebrews discusses the Mexican legend of the “bearded white god”
Quetzalcoatl. Elder Roberts questioned,


 



“Did this character spoken of in the ”View of the Hebrews,” published five years
before the Book of Mormon, furnish the suggestion of the ”Christ” on the
”Western Continent?”

B.H.Roberts – Studies of the Book of Mormon


 

 

His research discovered many more similarities, including:

 * The peopling of America from Israel crossing “many waters.”

 * Division into two classes. One civil and the other barbaric.

 * Civilized people develop a culture of mechanic arts; of written language; of
   the knowledge and use of iron and other metals; and of navigation.

 * The description of extensive military fortifications.

 * Long and dismal wars break out between the civilized and barbarous divisions
   of people.

 * The preaching of the gospel in ancient America by prophets.

 * Emphasizes and uses much of the material from the prophecies of Isaiah,
   including whole chapters.

 * The future gathering of Israel and restoration of the Ten Lost Tribes.

 * Both maintain that the purpose of America in the last days is to gather up
   the remnants of Israel, bringing them into Christianity, and bringing forth
   the millennium.

 *  And many more.


 

 

Elder Roberts compared the content of the Book of Mormon with Joseph’s
environment and upbringing. In doing so he considered popular publications like
View of the Hebrews, the King James Bible, the Apocrypha and other contemporary
sources available to Joseph and his friends.


 

 

“For years such materials as were then found and discussed, theories as to the
origin of the American Indians, including “the ten lost tribes” theory of Hebrew
infusion into the American race, together with frequent mention of cultural
traits favorable to this supposed Hebrew infusion, all this was matter of common
speculation in the literature of America, before the publication of either
Priest’s American Antiquities or the Book of Mormon.”

B.H. Roberts – Studies of the Book of Mormon, p.152


 

 

“Did Ethan Smith’s View of the Hebrews furnish structural material for Joseph
Smith’s Book of Mormon? It has been pointed out in these pages that there are
many things in the former book that might well have suggested many major things
in the other. Not a few things merely, one or two, or half a dozen, but many;
and it is this fact that many things of similarity and the cumulative force of
them that makes it so serious a menace to Joseph Smith’s story of the Book of
Mormon’s origins.”

B.H. Roberts – Studies of the Book of Mormon, p.240

 

 

 


 THE LATE WAR BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND GREAT BRITAIN

Joseph likely grew up reading The Late War Between the United States and Great
Britian by Gilbert J. Hunt, which was published in New York in 1816. Much like
Ethan Smith’s View of the Hebrews, evidence shows incredible similarities.



The Late War was a Biblical-style account of the War of 1812 and was read in
schools throughout the United States under the title, The Historical Reader.
Joseph would have been very familiar with this book as he was closely connected
to at least 4 teachers. His father, Joseph Smith Sr. was a teacher during the
off-season, his wife, Emma, and brother Hyrum were also teachers, and Oliver
Cowdery, the Book of Mormon’s principal scribe was a teacher.



In October 2013, the Word Tree Foundation conducted an analysis comparing over
100,000 books from the pre-1830’s era. They discovered a striking connection
between two: The Late War and The Book of Mormon. They noted over 100 rare
phrases that bind The Book of Mormon to The Late War; phrases that do not show
up in other contemporary books



Both books make mention of battles at forts and rivers, weapons of curious
workmanship, 2,000 stripling soldiers, bands of robbers, burning martyrs,
righteous vs. savage natives, cataclysmic events, Christopher Columbus, false
prophets, fighting for the cause of liberty, freemen vs. men of the king, metal
plates and engravings in brass, and many more.




The War of 1812 concluded only 15 years before the publishing of the Book of
Mormon. It was such a prominent and recent event that it made The Late War
studied and discussed at great length during Joseph Smith’s life.






REVIVAL MEETINGS

Revivals in early America started becoming popular in the early 1800s; this
sensation became known as the Second Great Awakening. Camp-in revivals were
organized by every denomination in the New England area and regularly drew
thousands of attendants per meeting. These revival camps typically gave farmers,
like the Smiths, the opportunity to take a break from their normal schedule and
meet with friends and family for a few days of worship. Wooden platforms and
towers were built so speakers could be seen and heard in the large crowds.

The story of King Benjamin in the Book of Mormon closely resembles one of these
revival meeting held in Palmyra, New York on June 7, 1826, just as Joseph Smith
was about to begin his work on the Book of Mormon.



“I attended their several meetings as often as occasion would permit. In process
of time my mind became somewhat partial to the Methodist sect, and I felt some
desire to be united with them”

Joseph Smith – Pearl of Great Price, Joseph Smith History ch.1 v8




 

The host of this large revival near the Smith’s home was Reverend Benjamin G.
Paddock, who recorded the events in his memoir. The closing speaker was an
aging, well-loved Methodist bishop who was there to give his final sermon. The
attendants pitched their tents in a semi-circle facing the tower. The
congregation of more than 10,000 heard the ailing Bishop express his love for
them and their need of a Savior.




 

“The venerable Bishop M’Kendree then visited us for the last time. He was too
feeble to preside, and occupied the chair only once or twice, he stated with
tearful emotion that he still had great affection for its members, and that to
take his final leave of them, so far, at least, as earth was concerned, was the
special object of his visit. The spirit of the meeting was admirable.
Conversions were numerous and powerful”

Benjamin G. Paddock – Memoir of Rev. Benjamin G. Paddock, 1875, p177-179



King Benjamin’s speech in the Book of Mormon seems to bear a resemblance to
popular revival meetings that the Smith family regularly attended, especially
the one recorded by Rev. Benjamin Paddock.




 

Mosiah ch.2

And they pitched their tents round about the temple, every man having his tent
with the door thereof towards the temple, that thereby they might remain in
their tents and hear the words which king Benjamin should speak unto them;

For the multitude being so great that king Benjamin could not teach them all
within the walls of the temple, therefore he caused a tower to be erected, that
thereby his people might hear the words which he should speak unto them.

But I am like as yourselves, subject to all manner of infirmities in body and
mind;

Behold, I say unto you that because I said unto you that I had spent my days in
your service, I do not desire to boast, for I have only been in the service of
God.

And I, even I, whom ye call your king, am no better than ye yourselves are; for
I am also of the dust. And ye behold that I am old, and am about to yield up
this mortal frame to its mother earth.


 



Could King Benjamin be named after Reverend Banjamin, the host of this revival
in Palmyra, New York? Could the circumstances and content of the ailing bishop’s
final sermon have influenced the events of King Bejamin’s speech?


 


 


THE FIRST BOOK OF NAPOLEON

Published only twenty years before Book of Mormon, The First Book of Napoleon
contains much of the same language, structure and themes. Author, Michael
Linning, a Scottish writer for the Queen, published this popular book in 1809,
under the pen name Elakim the Scribe. A short excerpt:



Chapter 1:1-3

And behold it came to pass, in these latter days, that an evil spirit arose on
the face of the earth, and greatly troubled the sons of men.

And this spirit seized upon, and spread amongst the people who dwell in the land
of Gaul.

Now, in this people the fear of the Lord had not been for many generations, and
they had become a corrupt and perverse people; and their chief priests, and the
nobles of the land, and the learned men thereof, had become wicked in the
imagines of their hearts, and in the practices of their lives.




TALES OF CAPTAIN






Captain William Kidd was a famous British pirate that spent considerable time
living in New York. Children in the New England area grew up hearing stories of
his many adventures. In 1690 Kidd was living in colonial New York when war
between England and France began. He began privateering for Britain (a
government sanctioned form of piracy against ships of enemy countries).

 

After the war Captain Kidd set out on his own and sailed to the Indian Ocean
seizing booty from French and Indian trade ships. Kidd used the Comoros islands
off the East coast of Africa as his safe haven while he competed with European
navies for control of the Indian Ocean trade routes. On the main island, the
Grand Comoro, sits the capital port city of Moroni, this provided Kidd with a
market for his stolen goods.

 

Captain Kidd buried caches of gold and valuables wherever he stopped to keep his
treasures safe. In 1701 he was arrested for the crime of piracy. A small
quantity of booty was found off the coast of Long Island, New York where it was
sent to England to be used as evidence against Kidd. He was later found guilty
and hanged.

 



Stories of Kidd’s buried treasures contributed to his popularity in the New York
area. People who knew Joseph Smith remember his connection to Captain Kidd. The
printer for the first edition of Book of Mormon, Pomroy Tucker, mentions that
Joseph “had a library copy of Arabian Nights, stories of Captain Kidd, and a few
novels.” (Pomeroy Tucker – Origin, Rise, and Progress of Mormonism, 1867)



A Palmyra native and one-time governor of the Utah Territory, Stephen S.
Harding, recalled that the gold plates had been discovered by “Joe Smith, who
had spent his time for several years in tellin fortunes and digging for hidden
treasures, and especially for pots and iron chests of money, supposed to have
been buried by Captain Kidd.” (Stephen S. Harding – Thomas Gregg, The Prophet of
Palmyra, 1890. Cited in Early Mormon Documents, 3:153-4)

 

Today the spelling of his famous Indian Ocean base, the Comoros Islands, has
been standardized, but this has not always been the case. This 1808 map of
Africa labels the islands, as they were known in Joseph’s time, as Camora.

 

It all becomes very problematic to learn that Joseph Smith was already familiar
with the names Moroni and Cumorah and their connection to buried gold, long
before he ever wrote of his First Vision. Being raised with tales of buried
treasure and later as a well-known treasure hunter himself, it seems possible
that Joseph would name the hill that held golden plates ‘Cumorah’ and its
guardian ‘Moroni’ because of his association with Captain Kidd.




THE APOCRYPHA


For many years after Jesus’ death, leaders of Christian groups would convene
councils in attempts to agree on the various written works that were to be
considered canon. Eventually, in the 16th Century, the Roman Catholic Church
canonized what we know as the Christian Bible today, but also included an
additional collection of books written during the space between the Old and New
Testaments known as the Apocrypha. Protestants decided to omit the Apocrypha
from their Bible, but the King James edition containing the Apocrypha remained
in use by Lutheran and Methodist sects.



Joseph Smith purchased a Bible that contained the Apocrypha more than 10 years
before publishing the Book of Mormon. Church Education System director and
historian, Reed C. Durham, states,



“The Bible used for Joseph Smith’s Revision was purchased in E. B. Grandin’s
Bookstore in Palmyra, New York; on October 8, 1828; it was a large family Bible…
It was an edition of the Authorized Version together with the Apocrypha, which
was located between the two testaments, and was an 1828 edition, printed in
Cooperstown, New York, by H. and E. Phinney Company.”

Dr. Reed C. Durham, A History of Joseph Smith’s Revision of the Bible, Brigham
Young University, 1965, p.25








Much like the other books cited, Joseph’s Apocrypha contains many similarities
to the Book of Mormon that could be considered source material. Notable
similarities include the names Nephi and Laban and the story of Nephi chopping
off the head of Laban.




THE KING JAMES BIBLE

Lehi and his family carried the ‘plates of brass’ from Jerusalem to the New
World 600 years before the birth of Jesus. Since the brass plates only contained
the Old Testament, this prevented the Book of Mormon from having any content
from the King James version of the Bible, yet there appears to be three major
issues: italicized words, the Gospel of Mark and a long list of borrowed
phrases.



Italicized Words

King James sought to produce an official bible for The Church of England, and in
1604 royal scribes began the translation process. They worked on translating the
Old Testament, Apocrypha, and New Testament from Hebrew and Greek texts. Since
the languages didn’t translate perfectly the scribes would occasionally insert
their own words into the text to make the English more readable. It is easy to
find these words in the King James Bible because they are italicized for the
purpose of identifying which words were added by the scribes. When the Book of
Mormon copies sections from the Bible, we find these same italicized words that
were added by scribes for King James.

 

Example 1


 

Isaiah 9:1

“Nevertheless the dimness shall not be such as was in her vexation, … and
afterward did more grievously afflict her by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan.
”

 

2 Nephi 19:1

Nevertheless, the dimness shall not be such as was in her vexation, … and
afterwards did more grievously afflict by the way of the Red Sea beyond Jordan.


 

 

Example 2


 

Malachi 3:10

“… and pour you out a blessing that there shall not be room enough to receive
it.”



Nephi 24:10

“… and pour you out a blessing that there shall not be room enough to receive
it.”


 

It appears that when the Book of Mormon prophets quote the Old Testament they
aren’t quoting from the original Hebrew brass plates, but are quoting
translation notes by 17th Century scribes only found in the King James Version
of the Bible.



 

Gospel of Mark Addition



The ancient Greek manuscripts used in translating the New Testament into English
were missing the end of the Gospel of Mark.



“[Regarding] Mark 16:9-20. This section is a later addition; the original ending
of Mark appears to have been lost. The best and oldest manuscripts of Mark end
with ch. 16:8. Two endings were added very early. [A shorter and longer.] The
longer addition appears in English Bibles; its origin is uncertain. It is drawn
for the most part from Luke, chapter 24, and from John, chapter 20; there is a
possibility that verse 15 may come from Matthew 28:18-20.”

The Westminster Study Edition of the Holy Bible, 1948

 

Much like the italicized words, the ending to the gospel of Mark is another
un-divine addition to the Bible, and again we see the Book of Mormon quoting
directly from the King James version. If the Book of Mormon prophets only had
the brass plates available to them, then portions of the New Testament should
not appear in its pages, especially not a part of the New Testament that was
only later created to fill-in missing text.



Mark 9:17,18 [uninspired addition]

“And these signs shall follow them that believe; in my name shall they cast out
devils; they shall speak with new tongues; they shall take up serpents; and if
they drink any deadly thing’ it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the
sick and they shall recover”.



Mormon 9:24

“And these signs shall follow them that believe; in my name shall they cast out
devils; they shall speak with new tongues; they shall take up serpents; and if
they drink any deadly thing’ it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the
sick and they shall recover”.


 




Long List of Borrowed Phrases



















If the Book of Mormon prophets wrote their words over one thousand years before
the translation of the King James Bible, then there should be no appearance of
the Bible’s translation notes and later additions in the Book of Mormon, but
there they are. It is evident that Joseph copied large amounts from his Bible
into the Book of Mormon.



Is it possible that a combination of books and stories familiar to Joseph could
have been used as source material to create the Book of Mormon?








CHAPTER 16


 EXPERT VIEWS

LIST 1
LIST 2
LIST 3
LIST 4
LIST 5

Ch. 16


LDS and non-LDS scholars agree on the difficulties of Book of Mormon
archaeology. Collected below are the views from experts in the fields of
Mesoamerican archaeology and anthropology; they include: the National Geographic
Society, the Smithsonian Institution, university professors, and LDS scholars.




NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY


 

National Geographic Society,
Aug. 12, 1998

The Book of Mormon is clearly a work of great spiritual power; millions have
read and revered its words, first published by Joseph Smith in 1830. Yet Smith’s
narration is not generally taken as a scientific source for history of the
Americas. Archeologists and other scholars have long probed the hemisphere’s
past, and the Society does not know of anything found so far that has
substantiated the Book of Mormon. In fact, students of prehistoric Americas by
and large conclude that the New World’s earliest inhabitants arrived from Asia
via the Bearing Land Bridge. Lower sea levels during ice ages exposed the
continental shelf beneath Bering Straight, allowing generations of ancient
Siberians to migrate east. National Geographic carried “The First Americans” in
its September 1979 issue.

Julie Crain – National Geographic Society




 


SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION


 

National Museum of Natural History - Statement Regarding the Book of Mormon

The Smithsonian Institution has never used the Book of Mormon in any way as a
scientific guide. Smithsonian archeologists see no direct connection between the
archeology of the New World and the subject matter of the Book.



The physical type of the American Indian is basically Mongoloid, being most
closely related to that of the peoples of eastern, central and northeast Asia.
Archeological evidence indicates that the ancestors of the present Indians came
into the New World – probably over a land bridge known to have existed in the
Bering Straight region during the last Ice Age – in a continuing series of small
migrations beginning from about 25,000 to 30,000 years ago.



Present evidence indicates that the first people to reach this continent from
the East were the Norsemen who briefly visited the northeastern part of North
America (modern day Canada) around AD 1,000 and then settled in Greenland. There
is nothing to show that they reached Mexico or Central America.



One of the main lines of evidence supporting the scientific finding that
contacts with the Old World civilizations, if indeed they occurred at all, were
of very little significance for the development of American Indian
civilizations, is the fact that none of the principal Old World domesticated
food plants or animals occurred in the New World in pre-Colombian times.
American Indians had no wheat, barley, oats, millet, rice, cattle, pigs,
chickens, horses, donkeys, camels before 1492. (Camels and a type of early horse
were in the Americas, along with bison, mammoth and mastodon, but all these
animals became extinct around 10,000 BC at the time when the early big game
hunters spread across the Americas.)



Iron, steel, glass and silk were not used in the New World before 1492. Native
copper was worked in various location in pre-Columbian times, but true
metallurgy was limited to southern Mexico and the Andean region, where its
occurrence in the late prehistoric times involved gold, silver, copper and their
alloys, but not iron.



There is a possibility that the spread of cultural traits across the Pacific to
Mesoamerica and the northwestern coast of South America began several hundred
years before the Christian era. However, any such inter-hemispheric contacts
appear to have been the results of accidental voyages originating in eastern and
southern Asia. It is by no means certain that even such contacts occurred with
the ancient Egyptians, Hebrews, or other peoples of Western Asia and the Near
East.



No reputable Egyptologist or other Specialist on Old World archeology, and no
expert on New World prehistory, has discovered or confirmed any relationship
between archeological remains in Mexico and archeological remains in Egypt.



Reports of findings of ancient Egyptian, Hebrew, and other Old World writings in
the New World in pre-Columbian contexts have frequently appeared in newspapers,
magazines, and sensational books. None of these claims has stood up to
examination by reputable scholars. No inscriptions using Old World forms of
writing have been shown to have occurred in any part of the Americas before 1492
except for a few Norse rune stones which have been found in Greenland.

Anthropology Outreach Office
Department of Anthropology
National Museum of National History
MRC 112 Smithsonian Institution
Washington, DC 20560


 


DR. MICHAEL COE

Dr. Coe is the foremost authority on New World archaeology. Earning his PhD in
anthropology from Harvard University, he is chair emeritus of Anthropology at
Yale University. He is Curator Emeritus of the Anthropology collection in the
Peabody Museum of Natural History, and has authored over 20 major publications
on Mesoamerica.


 

Dr. Coe was invited to publish his thoughts on Book of Mormon archeology in the
LDS scholarly journal, Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. He stated:



“Mormon archaeologists over the years have almost unanimously accepted the Book
of Mormon as an accurate, historical account of the New World peoples…. Let me
now state uncategorically that as far as I know there is not one professionally
trained archaeologist, who is not a Mormon, who sees any scientific
justification for believing the foregoing to be true, and I would like to state
that there are quite a few Mormon archaeologists who join this group. […] The
bare facts of the matter are that nothing, absolutely nothing, has even shown up
in any New World excavation which would suggest to a dispassionate observer that
the Book of Mormon, as claimed by Joseph Smith, is a historical document
relating to the history of early migrants to our hemisphere.”

Dr. Michael Coe – Archaeology and the Book of Mormon, Dialogue:
A Journal of Mormon Thought, Summer 1973




UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS

In 2013, LDS member, Zachary Lien, contacted a number of university professors,
experts in their respective fields, and asked them to enlighten him on some of
the historical claims of the LDS Church.




 

Upon research, I found your name as an expert of Mesoamerica.This is why I hope
to get a response from you, because you come highly recommended and acclaimed.
My question to you would be: What is your opinion is on the historical
authenticity of the Book of Mormon, the Book of Abraham, and the language called
“Reformed Egyptian”? I hope you do not feel uncomfortable answering because it
relates to religious matters. I ask this question in pure curiosity and with a
hope to learn. Some claims from the Book of Mormon are as follows:



 * In 600 B.C. a family from Jerusalem sailed to modern day Central America and
   began a civilization there. This civilization split into two main groups, the
   Nephites and Lamanites. And after centuries of war, the Lamanites were the
   last surviving.

 * Lamanites are the principal ancestors of the Mayas, Incas, Olmecs, Aztecs and
   Native Americans.

 * Nephites and Lamanites initially spoke Hebrew in Mesoamerica. Over
   approximately 1,000 years the linguistics evolved into what the Native
   Americans speak today.

 

The responses regarding the Book of Mormon are listed below.



Louise Burkhart – Professor in the Anthropology Department at the University at
Albany, PhD in Anthropology from Yale University


 

Dear Zachary
It is true that I am a busy woman, but I can answer your question. I hope that I
am not belittling your religion if I say that all historical and archaeological
evidence contradicts the Book of Mormon’s stories of the peopling of the
Americas and the early history of Native American societies. The Book of Mormon
is a work of faith, and naturally has credibility to the faithful, but it has no
historical basis, any more than the Book of Genesis is a historically or
scientifically accurate version of the origin of the earth and human beings,
however much it, or the Book of Mormon, may serve as a moral guide to believers.
And I’m sure you can understand why people might be uncomfortable directly
contradicting the teachings of what has become a very well-established religious
movement.



The Americas were peopled by immigrants from Asia probably 15,000 years ago
(give or take some thousands; archaeologists still haven’t quite figured this
out). This is born out by archaeology as well as genetic evidence (DNA, blood
types, and other factors). Their descendants settled throughout the entire New

World. Complex, urban civilizations developed in Mexico and Central America in
isolation from the rest of the world, out of the accumulated knowledge of people
who lived there for thousands of years, domesticated corn and other food crops,
and learned very well how to live in those environments. Languages of the
New World bear no relationship to Hebrew. Ever since Europeans became aware of
Native Americans, there have been various attempts to identify them with the
socalled “Ten Lost Tribes of Israel” mentioned in the Old Testament. So we might
say that Joseph Smith’s version was in some degree a variation on this old
theme.

 

David Carrasco – Professor of the Study of Latin America at Harvard Divinity
School, PhD in the History of Religions from the University of Chicago



Dear Zachary
I see you are deeply interested in the history of Mexico as it relates to the
Book of Mormon. I respect the Mormon religion and have been to Salt Lake City to
see the Mormon monuments and displays.



The Book of Mormon is a book of faith and storytelling and not history.
Historically it is inaccurate. If we go on archaeological evidence, there is no
basis for what the Book of Mormon teaches, as you summarize it below. There is
no record of the arrival of anyone from Jerusalem. Here’s another point. People
of faith believe what they want to believe about the authenticity of their own
religion. Some Catholics believed that St. Tomas, one of Jesus Christ’s
disciples migrated to Mexico after the crucifixion and preached in Mexico. This
is because they found some parallels between Aztec and Maya religion and the
Bible. But there is not one single fact, datum, object, word that supports
either the Mormon view or the Catholic view. My book Religions of Mesoamerica is
coming out again in paperback in September and I address these claims in the
first chapter.

 


 

Geoffrey Conrad – Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at Indiana University, PhD
in Anthropology from Harvard University


 

Thank you for your message. I should begin by saying that while I’ve written
about Mesoamerican archaeology and taught about it for years, it isn’t my
primary area of specialization. I did most of my own fieldwork in South America
and the Caribbean. When I wrote about Mesoamerica, I was collaborating with my
colleague Prof. Arthur Demarest (now at Vanderbilt University), whose primary
area of expertise is indeed Mesoamerica. When I taught about Mesoamerica, it was
always in a course on comparative ancient civilizations. Also, I’ve never read
anything more than snippets of the Book of Mormon and can only discuss the
specific claims you’ve listed below. After saying all of that, I think I do have
enough knowledge to assess the claims you’ve listed. Insofar as I can tell, they
are not supported by any archaeological, linguistic, or genetic evidence. Some
specific points of disagreement are:


1) Complex societies (“civilizations,” for short) began to emerge in Mesoamerica
well before 600 B.C.–nearly 1,000 years earlier, in fact. All of the
archeological evidence indicates that those complex societies were developed by
the native peoples of Mesoamerica out of their own longstanding cultural
traditions.

2) The native peoples of Mesoamerica are American Indians. All archaeological
and genetic evidence indicates that their ancestors came from northeast Asia
(Siberia) and entered what is today the Americas sometime before 13,000 years
ago.

3) There were probably several thousand native languages spoken in the Americas
when Columbus arrived. They belonged to a number of language families, but none
of the ones we know anything about belonged to the Semitic language family,
which includes Hebrew. None of the known native languages of the Americas show
any evidence of being derived from Hebrew.

4) With the single exception of Norse settlement in what is today Newfoundland,
Canada, there is no evidence of any people from Europe or Southwest Asia in the
Americas before Columbus. A small number of Norse colonists from Greenland
settled in Newfoundland around A.D. 1000. The colony was short-lived, however,
and was abandoned within a century. I hope this information is useful to you. I
do have two colleagues in the Department of Anthropology at Indiana University
who are specialists in Mesoamerican archaeology. Both are out of the country
this summer, but if they were here, I’m certain they wouldn’t say anything
different from what I’ve said.

Geoffrey W. Conrad Professor Emeritus of Anthropology Director Emeritus, Mathers
Museum of World Cultures Indiana University Bloomington

 


 

John Henderson – Professor of Anthropology at Cornell University, PhD in
Anthropology from Yale University.


 

I haven’t seen convincing evidence that a group of Hebrew speakers arrived in
Mesoamerica. Language is one area that seems to indicate a negative.
Mesoamerican languages clump into a couple of large groupings, but those
groupings are very different from one another, and none of them seems related to
Hebrew; linguists are sure that there wouldn’t be nearly enough time between 600
BC and the Spanish invasion to produce that much variation and obscure a Hebrew
ancestry. Of course, I haven’t seen a lot of the publications of the LDS church
(claims of archaeological confirmation of the Book of Mormon don’t show up in
standard archaeological publications).

 


 

Arthur Joyce – Professor of Anthropology at the University of Colorado, Boulder,
PhD in Anthropology from Rutgers University


 

I don’t see evidence of a major migration of outsiders into Mesoamerica around
600 B.C. Archaeologists are able to trace Native American populations back more
than 10,000 years ago. There are no indications of Hebrew roots in Native
American languages.

 


 

William Saturno – Assistant Professor of Archaeology at Boston University, PhD
in Anthropology from Harvard.


 

University Any attempt to scientifically verify the events of largely religious
documents, whether that be Noah’s flood or the travels of Lamanites and Nephites
is unlikely to produce a result that will appeal to anyone beyond the faithful.
That is to say that people will believe what they are most comfortable believing
regardless of what scientists illustrate to be the most likely scenario, take
global warming as an example. In direct reference to the existence of evidence
of Hebrew speaking/descendant populations in the Mesoamerica prior to the
arrival of Columbus, there is none. That is to say that following more than a
century of dedicated research, not a single shred of evidence (potsherd, seed,
or residue) of old world origin has ever been found. This is the case even
though some Mormon scholars themselves have been searching for that evidence

 


 

Michael Smith – Professor of Anthropology at Arizona State University.


 

You are asking about religious interpretations, not scientific interpretations.
From a scientific viewpoint, the Book of Mormon has no standing as an accurate
or even a relevant source about ancient Mesoamerican history or archaeology.
There is no reason to believe that Joseph Smith knew anything about the
Mesoamerican past, or to believe that he heard historical truth from God. So I
have no opinion about this.



It is often impossible to “test” historical religious accounts against
archaeological evidence. The reason is that many people bring strong
predispositions to believe the accounts (or to not believe them), and this
colors their interpretations. Consider the archaeology of the Old Testament. Did
David exist? Did he rule an empire, or build a big palace and temple? Have we
found evidence for these things? There is endless argument about this, and the
situation will probably never be settled. I assume that you know about the New
World Archaeological Foundation. It is funded by the LDS church for carrying out
archaeology in Mesoamerica. The archaeology they do is rigorous and very good.
Their technical reports say nothing about the Book of Mormon. But at some level
in the church, people are probably interpreting the archaeological results with
reference to the Book of Mormon.


 



Brian Stross – Professor in the Department of Anthropology at the University of
Texas at Austin, PhD in Anthropology from the University of California,
Berkeley.


 

There is little if any support to the historicity claim for the Book of Mormon,
even including scholarly Mormon investigators, who, like Thomas Lee and John
Clark have advanced Mesoamerican archaeology (without, however, advancing
support of historical propositions in the Book of Mormon.) The Book of Mormon
therefore doesn’t carry credible historical weight except to persons who take it
on faith that it is a sacred book with historical import. The key is that, as
with most religions, faith rather than scientific evidence, is what props up
beliefs and information given to and propagated by the faithful.

 


 


LDS SCHOLARS


 

Dr. Dee F. Green – Editor of the University Archaeological Society Newsletter,
at Brigham Young University


 

“The first myth we need to eliminate is that Book of Mormon archaeology exists….
If one is to study Book of Mormon archaeology, then one must have a corpus of
data with which to deal. We do not. The Book of Mormon is really there so one
can have Book of Mormon studies, and archaeology is really there so one can
study archaeology, but the two are not wed. At least they are not wed in reality
since no Book of Mormon location is known with reference to modern topography.
Biblical archaeology can be studied because we do know where Jerusalem and
Jericho were and are, but we do not know where Zarahemla and Bountiful (nor any
other location for that matter) were or are. It would seem then that a
concentration on geography should be the first order of business, but we have
already seen that twenty years of such an approach has left us emptyhanded.”

Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 1969, pp. 77-78

 


 

Thomas Stuart Ferguson – Founded the New World Archaeological Foundation (NAWF)

The NWAF was organized in 1952 for the purpose of supporting archaeological
research into pre-Columbian cultures of Mesoamerica. Ferguson convinced then BYU
president, Howard S. McDonald, to establish the archeology (now anthropology)
department at BYU. While the Church funded the NWAF organization, Thomas Stuart
Ferguson organized archaeological fieldwork in the area of Mesoamerica. Towards
the end of his career he concluded that the archaeological evidence could not
authenticate the Book of Mormon. Ferguson admitted that although the foundation
made important contributions to New World archaeology, all his work with regard
to the Book of Mormon was in vain. On March 12, 1975 Ferguson participated in a
symposium on Book of Mormon geography. He details “the big weak spots” involved
in archaeologically authenticating the Book of Mormon. To Ferguson the four most
exacting tests were the existence of appropriate plant life, animal life,
metals, and scripts.




 

“Evidence of the foregoing animals has not appeared in any form — ceramic
representations, bones or skeletal remains, mural art, sculptured art or any
other form. The zero score presents a problem that will not go away with the
ignoring of it. The absence of such evidence … is distressing and significant,
in my view.… I’m afraid that up to this point, I must agree with Dee Green, who
has told us that to date there is no Book of Mormon geography.”

Thomas S. Ferguson – Written Symposium on Book-of-Mormon Geography:
Response of Thomas S. Ferguson




 

“…you can’t set Book of Mormon geography down anywhere because it is fictional
and will never meet the requirements of the dirt-archeology.”

Thomas Stuart Ferguson – Letter to Mr. & Mrs. H.W. Lawrence, February 20, 1976

 


 

 

Dr. Ray T. Matheny – Professor of Anthropology at BYU
After working in Mesoamerican archaeology for 22 years, Dr. Matheny admitted
that he has a difficult time reconciling the lack of evidence.




 

“If I were doing this cold like John Carlson is here, I would say in evaluating
the Book of Mormon that it had no place in the New World whatsoever. I would
have to look for the place of the Book of Mormon events to have taken place in
the Old World. It just doesn’t seem to fit anything that he has been taught in
his discipline, nor I in my discipline in anthropology, history; there seems to
be no place for it. It seems misplaced. It seems like there are anachronisms. It
seems like the items are out of time and place, and trying to put them into the
New World. And I think there’s a great difficulty here for we Mormons in
understanding what this book is all about.”

Ray T. Matheny – Book of Mormon Archeology, Sunstone Symposium, August 25, 1984

 


 

Dr. John E. Clark – Professor of Archaeology at BYU


 

“In accord with these general observations about New York and Pennsylvania, we
come to our principal object—the, Hill Cumorah Archaeologically speaking, it is
a clean hill. No artifacts, no walls, no trenches, no arrowheads. The area
immediately surrounding the hill is similarly clean. Pre- Columbian people did
not settle or build here. This is not the place of Mormon’s last stand. We must
look elsewhere for that hill.”

John E. Clark – Archaeology and Cumorah Questions, Journal of Mormon Studies,
2004
http://publications.mi.byu.edu/fullscreen/ ?pub=1412&index=15

 


 

Why do LDS and non-LDS archaeologists take such a poor view of the Book of
Mormon? Perhaps because the book’s historical claims have not withstood the
scrutiny of archaeology, biology, history and linguistics.


 


 


CONTEXT

Members have been taught to see the Book of Mormon as a true record of the
history of ancient America, yet under close inspection it does not appear to
support that claim.

 

1. DNA evidence disproves the Hebrew origins of the Native Americans.

2. Reformed Egyptian characters bare no resemblance to Mayan hieroglyphs, but
appear to be a stylized English alphabet and numeric system.

3. Modern animals, technology and metallurgy have been mistakenly inserted into
the past.

4. The Jaredite transatlantic voyage could not have taken place.

5. The remains of millions of soldiers are no where to be found on the Hill
Cumorah.

6. Several sources for the Book of Mormon show unquestionable similarities.

7. LDS and academic scholars agree that the Book of Mormon is not historically
accurate.

 

The events surrounding the creation of the Book of Mormon seem to point to
Joseph’s folk magic roots, its content greatly reflects other sources, and its
purpose may very well hint at Joseph’s treasure hunting past.


 


 


 


 


PART 3


THE BOOK OF ABRAHAM


Part 3



“On 3 July 1835 a man named Michael Chandler brought four Egyptian mummies and
several papyrus scrolls of ancient Egyptian writings to Kirtland, Ohio. The
mummies and papyri had been discovered [excavated] in Egypt several years
earlier by Antonio Lebolo. Kirtland was one of many stops in the eastern United
States for Chandler’s mummy exhibition. Chandler was offering the mummies and
rolls of papyrus for sale and, at the urging of the Prophet Joseph Smith,
several members of the Church donated money to purchase them. In a statement
dated 5 July 1835, Joseph Smith, declaring the importance of these ancient
Egyptian writings, recorded: “I commenced the translation of some of the
characters or hieroglyphics, and much to our joy found that one of the rolls
contained the writings of Abraham.”

Doctrine and Church History – Seminary Teacher Manual, 2013,
Lesson 152: The Coming Forth of the Pearl of Great Price



After Joseph Smith’s death, the Egyptian artifacts were passed from his
mother,Lucy, to Emma and son, Joseph Smith III. The mummies and papyri were sold
to the St. Louis Museum. The museum closed in 1863 and its collection moved to
the Chicago Museum, which was destroyed in The Great Chicago Fire of 1871. Many
recovered artifacts were dispersed throughout the country. Remaining papyri made
their way to the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art; and in 1966 were
discovered in the museum archives. After being contacted, the Church purchased
these pieces back from the Metropolitan. The Church now possesses original
papyri labeled “Facsimile 1” and “Joseph Smith Papyri 2-8.”


The Book of Abraham is the result of Joseph Smith’s interpretation of the
hieroglyphics contained on these papyri. It is regarded as a book of scripture
written by the hand of Abraham about his life and visions of the creation and
pre-mortal life. The book also contains 3 facsimiles drawn by Abraham and Joseph
Smith’s interpretation of their imagery.

These papyri have been studied by modern Egyptologists and have been determined
to be a collection of documents known as “the Book of the Dead,” which are
traditionally placed with the deceased to aid in their transition into the
afterlife. The hieroglyphics identify the deceased as Hor; likely one of the
mummies sold to Joseph Smith. Presented here are several issues regarding each
facsimile and the translation of the hieroglyphics.








CHAPTER 17


 THE ROSETTA STONE


Ch. 17


The Rosetta Stone is a large ancient Egyptian tablet inscribed with a decree
issued by King Ptolemy V at Memphis, Egypt in 196 BC. The same decree appears in
three different scripts: Egyptian hieroglyphs, Demotic, and Ancient Greek. After
its discovery in 1799, the Rosetta Stone provided the key to decode ancient
Egyptian text.




BACKGROUND

During the Napoleonic expedition to Egypt in 1799, French soldier
Pierre-François Bouchard discovered the stone near Rosetta, Egypt in the Nile
delta. As the first Ancient Egyptian multilingual text recovered in modern time,
the Rosetta Stone had potential to decipher, up to this point, an indecipherable
ancient language. In 1822, Scholar and founder of Egyptology, Jean-François
Champollion, announced the complete translation of the Egyptian hieroglyphics.




ACCESS TO THE TRANSLATION



Before it became illegal, Egyptian antiquities excavator Antonio Lebolo removed
eleven mummies with accompanying papyri from Thebes, Egypt. The mummies made
their way to Salesman Michael Chandler in New York where they became the first
Egyptian artifacts in America. Chandler traveled to Philadelphia before
Kirtland, Ohio looking for buyers, when he met Joseph Smith in 1835. Joseph
urged the Kirtland members of the Church to donate for the purchase of
Chandler’s remaining unsold artifacts. Joseph didn’t know that a translation of
Ancient Egyptian was completed only years earlier in France when he set out
to translate the papyri himself.



Was Joseph able to decipher the hieroglyphics? Luckily, he kept detailed records
of his struggles with the translation process. The Church has made his notebooks
available as the Kirtland Egyptian Papers 1-10. The result of his efforts are
recorded in Facsimiles 1-3 and the Book of Abraham.


Ch. 18


CHAPTER 18


FACSIMILE #1







Facsimile #1 has two major issues: first, Joseph incorrectly filled-in the
missing portion of papyrus, and second, Joseph’s interpretation of the image
appears to be incorrect.


 


MISSING PORTION OF PAPYRUS




This image at left shows the actual papyrus from josephsmithpapers.org, which
Joseph glued onto a piece of paper and penciled in the missing image. The image
at right shows Joseph’s filled-in image from the Book of Abraham and is known as
Facsimile #1. Shown below are similar Egyptian pictographs containing the
missing head.



Common burial artwork depicts Anubis, the jackal-headed god of the afterlife,
preparing those recently deceased for their journey beyond. Joseph appears to
have incorrectly filled-in the missing portion of the papyri he purchased from
Mr. Chandler.




MISTRANSLATIONS



A number of modern Egyptologists have translated the text of this facsimile, and
their conclusions are all in close agreement. The text simply conveys
information about the deceased for whom the papyri were created.

 

Joseph’s translation claims the four jars underneath    the     table   
represent    various



idolatrous gods, however similar jars have been found to contain the organs of
the deceased from the embalming procedure. Lastly, compared to modern
translation of the image, Joseph’s interpretation of each section contains
significant errors.


Ch. 19


CHAPTER 19


FACSIMILE #2







A hypocephalus is a small disk-shaped image placed under the heads of the dead
by ancient Egyptians from the Later Period onwards. The shape symbolized the eye
of Ra and the markings contain images of various deities and excerpts from the
Book of the Dead.







MISSING PORTION OF PAPYRUS

The original papyri was destroyed in the museum during the Great Chicago Fire.
The earliest surviving image of Facsimile #2 was copied by Elder Willard
Richards. Much like Facsimile #1, Facsimile #2 was also missing a portion of the
papyrus and was filled-in to make the image appear complete before printing. At
left shows Willard’s copy and Joseph’s filled-in image at right.

 

Normally, undamaged hypocephali depict a four ram-headed god as the central
figure (as shown in these images of undamaged papyri below) but since the top of
this figure in Joseph’s papyrus was missing, he filled it in using the head and
shoulders from the figure directly above it.



Regarding the central figure in these type of burial documents, Egyptologist Dr.
Samuel A.B. Mercer stated,



It represents the four-headed ram-god, a form of the united spirits of the four
elements.

Samuel A.B. Mercer – Joseph Smith as an Interpreter
and Translator of Egyptian, Utah Survey, 1913





Additionally, Joseph used parts of other papyri to fill-in the missing portion
of Facsimile #2. The boat came from Papyri IV and the missing circular text from
Papyri VI.



Ch. 20


CHAPTER 20


 FACSIMILE #3







As with Facsimiles 1 & 2, Facsimile #3 is commonly found as part of a collection
of documents referred to as “the Book of the Dead.” Evidence suggests that
Joseph Smith’s interpretation of the characters appear to be incorrect.





MISSING PORTION OF PAPYRUS







In the Book of Abraham, Joseph interprets Facsimile #3 as Abraham sitting on
Pharaoh’s throne teaching the court the principles of astronomy. He labels
figure 1 as Abraham and figure 2 as Pharaoh. Actually this is Osiris, God of the
Underworld, and his goddess wife Isis. The hieroglyphics  above  each  of 
 their  heads

identify them as such. Additionally, Joseph misidentifies figures 2 and 4 as
males when the figures are actually of females.



Show bellow are the similar Egyptian pictographs containing the same scene and
the characters



Ch. 21


CHAPTER 21


THE TRANSLATION







The Church has consistently taught that the original author of the Book of
Abraham is Abraham himself. For many years Egyptologists have refuted this claim
stating that the actual translation of the papyri does not match the printed
text. Covered in this chapter: the original claim, statement by LDS scholar, the
recent statement by the Church, and a statement by an Egyptologist regarding the
Book of Abraham.




THE ORIGINAL CLAIM

For nearly 180 years the Church has taught that the Book of Abraham is the
result of Joseph Smith’s translation of hieroglyphics written by the hand of
Abraham.



The Book of Abraham – Heading

The writings of Abraham while he was in Egypt, called the Book of
Abraham, written by his own hand, upon papyrus.



“In a statement dated 5 July 1835, Joseph Smith, declaring the importance of
these ancient Egyptian writings, recorded: “I commenced the translation of some
of the characters or hieroglyphics, and much to our joy found that one of the
rolls contained the writings of Abraham.”

LDS.org, Pearl of Great Price Student Manual





STATEMENT BY LDS SCHOLAR

Michael Dennis Rhodes – Associate professor of ancient scripture at Brigham
Young University.

Rhodes is an Egyptologist who has published a translation of some of the Joseph
Smith papyri. In his book, The Hor Book of Breathings:A Translation and
Commentary, Rhodes writes:



“The Hor Book of Breathings is a part of eleven papyri fragments in the New York
Metropolitan Museum of Art that came to the attention of Dr. Aziz Atiyah in
1966. These fragments, subsequently donated to the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints in 1967, came from three separate papyri rolls. Joseph Smith
Papyri I, X, and XI are from the Book of Breathings belonging to Hor (Ór), the
son of Usiwer (Wsir-wr), which is the subject of this book.”




Prof. Rhodes is one of the Mormon scholars that the Church is referring to when
it stated,



“Mormon and non-Mormon Egyptologists agree that the characters on the fragments
do not match the translation given in the book of Abraham.”

LDS.org, Translation and Historicity of the Book of Abraham, 2014




 


STATEMENT BY EGYPTOLOGIST

After the Church made the papyri available for public study, Egyptologists have
refuted the accuracy of Joseph’s translation.



Dr. Robert K. Ritner – Professor of Egyptology at the University of Chicago and
at Yale University:



“With the Book of Abraham now confirmed as a perhaps well-meaning, but erroneous
invention by Joseph Smith, the LDS church may well devote some reflection to the
status of the text. The former Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints, since 2001 renamed the Community of Christ, avoids this issue by
treating the Book of Abraham as speculative writing by Smith, not as a document
of historical truth. In this decision they are clearly correct. Despite its in
authenticity as a genuine historical narrative, the Book of Abraham remains a
valuable witness to early American religious history and to the recourse to
ancient texts as sources of modern religious faith and speculation. The book
still has its uses and significance, but not for the ancient world of Egypt and
Abraham.”

Robert K Ritner – “Translation and historicity
of the book of Abraham,” A Response




The very same papyri that Joseph possessed have been studied by LDS and non-LDS
Egyptologists. Both agree that the papyri are The Book of Breathings of Hor, and
that the translations make no mention of Abraham.





RECENT STATEMENT BY THE CHURCH

In light of a growing body of opposing evidence, the Church has acknowledged
that the original claim to the Book of Abraham is untrue. On July 8, 2014,
published on LDS.org, the article, Translation and Historicity of the Book of
Abraham, confirms that the Book of Abraham is, in fact, not a translation of the
Egyptian papyri.


 

“Some evidence suggests that Joseph studied the characters on the Egyptian
papyri and attempted to learn the Egyptian language. His history reports that,
in July 1835, he was “continually engaged in translating an alphabet to the Book
of Abraham, and arranging a grammar of the Egyptian language as practiced by the
ancients.” This “grammar,” as it was called, consisted of columns of
hieroglyphic characters followed by English translations recorded in a large
notebook by Joseph’s scribe, William W. Phelps. Another manuscript, written by
Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, has Egyptian characters followed by
explanations. Neither the rules nor the translations in the grammar book
correspond to those recognized by Egyptologists today.” “None of the characters
on the papyrus fragments mentioned Abraham’s name or any of the events recorded
in the book of Abraham. Mormon and non-Mormon Egyptologists agree that the
characters on the fragments do not match the translation given in the book of
Abraham.” “Scholars have identified the papyrus fragments as parts of standard
funerary texts that were deposited with mummified bodies. These fragments date
to between the third century B.C.E. and the first century C.E., long after
Abraham lived.”

LDS.org Translation and Historicity of the Book of Abraham, July 8, 2014.


 





ABRAHAM AND THE PAPYRI

Since the Church has now come forward acknowledging that Joseph’s translation of
the papyri is incorrect, where did he get the idea that the scrolls containing
the Book of Abraham in the first place ?



“The public mind has been excited of late, by reports which have been circulated
concerning certain Egyptian mummies and ancient records which were purchased by
certain gentlemen of Kirtland, last July. It has been said that the purchasers
of these antiquities pretend they have the bodies of Abraham, Abimelech the king
of the Philistines, Joseph who was sold into Egypty, &c., &c., for the purpose
of attracting the attention of the multitude, and gulling the unwary…”

The Latter Day Saints’ Millennial Star, no.34, vol. XV. Saturday Augus 20, 1853.
pp. 549



In an effort to increase sales, Michael Chandler told the saints in Kirtland
that the mummies were the bodies of Abraham and Joseph who was sold into Egypt.










CHAPTER 22


EXPERT VIEWS







Collected below are the views from experts in the fields of Egyptology regarding
the general claims of the Book of Abraham.


 


UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS

Continued from Chapter 16, the remaining responses from university professors
regarding the historical claims of the Book of Abraham.

 

Peter Brand – Professor of Ancient History and Egyptology, PhD in Ancient
Egyptian Language and Literature from the University of Toronto



Hi Zachary. Its good to hear from you and I’m happy to help you out. Just as
background I am an Egyptologist and I am also someone who has a close friend and
colleague (a historian) who is Mormon but who does not necessarily believe
everything the elders tell him. As it happens I suspect that I know, too, who
the “notable PhD’s” the members of your church are referring to. I am not an
expert on LDS but I do understand that there is a longstanding connection with
Egyptology based on a papyrus the Church holds. There are two Egyptolologists
from Brigham Young University who are also members of the church and who often
act to promote and defend the Church’s teachings in the academic realm, but with
little success in changing minds I suspect. I am not myself a believer and I am
highly skeptical of the Book of Mormon and the Book of Abraham. I would also
agree with the mainstream Egyptological view that the Joseph Smith Papyrus is
simply a Roman era set of Egyptian papyri with various Ancient Egyptian texts
including sections of a “Book of the Dead” and another known as the “book of
breathing”. There is no connection between these texts and any aspect of
Christianity or Judaism. Outside of Mormon scholars, there is not any
recognition of or belief in a “reformed egyptian” script or language. The photos
of so called “reformed Egyptian” documents that I have seen do not resemble
genuine Egyptian scripts of any kind from any period of Egypt’s long pharaonic
history including both hieroglyphic forms or the more cursive forms known as
hieratic and demotic. They look like a modern person’s attempt at making
cryptogramatic symbols of a modernly invented secret code in that they resemble
nonsense “letters” of an alphabet rather than pictorial symbols like hieroglyphs
or even the much more varied and differently shaped ligatures of hieratic or
demotic Egyptian cursive writing.



There is simply no evidence that the Smith Papyri are anything more than
mainstream Egyptologists have identified them as being– namely typical pharaonic
funerary papyri from the last centuries of pagan civilization in Egypt. Despite
years of study at BYU, no one has duplicated Smith’s “readings” of the papyri as
the “book of Abraham” which strongly suggests it is a fictional invention of his
imagination. This is not necessarily to say that he didn’t believe himself what
he told to others. Who knows? People are as capable of deceiving themselves as
they are of others. A good rule of thumb in judging such matters is that
“Extraordinary claims should have extraordinary evidence” so, when they haul up
the actual body or capture a live plesiosaurus in Loch Ness in Scotland then I
will believe in the Lock Ness Monster. I desperately wanted to believe in it
when I was 12 but after reading a 300 page book on it from the library with some
fuzzy pictures and invented drawings i came to realize that there was no
evidence for such a creature. Sale of antiquities was very common in the 19th
century and the first half of the 20th century. Given that– unless you believe
it to be a “miracle”– how likely is it that someone like Smith who knew nothing
about Egyptology per se, would just happen to buy the “right” papyri that
happened to have this “lost book” of scripture? It strikes anyone who does not
already believe the truth of it, or who wants to believe the truth of it, as
being highly unlikely. Of course, people often want to believe the highly
improbable and can be easily swayed to believe in fantastic or miraculous
claims. This is often how new religions spread. Simply by being old, religions
can often become accepted as being “fact” or “true” in part because so many
people have believed them for so long. I hope this helps. Let me know if you
have any further questions. Best wishes,Peter Brand.


 

Salima Ikram – Professor of Egyptology at the American University in Cairo, PhD
in Egyptology and Museum Studies from the University of Cambridge.



“The Book of Abraham and Reformed Egyptian: In 1835 Joseph Smith purchased
Egyptian papyri from a traveling mummy exhibit and revealed that they were the
writings of the prophet of Abraham. Today, these facsimiles have caused
considerable controversy. Many Egyptologists have noted that the facsimiles have
no bearing on Joseph Smith’s translations and are instead common Egyptian
funerary texts from the first century B.C.”

I echo the sentiments of the Egyptologists. Salima Ikram.



Peter Der Manuelian – Professor of Egyptology and Director, Harvard Semitic
Museum, Harvard University. PhD in Egyptology from the University of Chicago.



“Dear Zachary, Thank you for this email. I am one of those who believe that the
facsimiles have no bearing on Joseph Smith’s translations and are instead common
Egyptian funerary texts. I am not personally aware of any professional
Egyptologists who feel differently. With best wishes, Peter Manuelian.”





ADDITIONAL EGYPTOLOGISTS

There are many more experts of Egyptology who have studied the authenticity of
the Book of Abraham.




Arthur Mace – Assistant Curator for the Department of Egyptian Art of the
Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York

 

“The Book of Abraham, it is hardly necessary to say, is a pure fabrication. Cuts
1 and 3 are inaccurate copies of well known scenes on funeral papyri, and cut 2
is a copy of one of the magical discs which in the late Egyptian period were
placed under the heads of mummies. There were about forty of these latter known
in museums and they are all very similar in character. Joseph Smith’s
interpretation of these cuts is a farrago of nonsense from beginning to end.
Egyptian characters can now be read almost as easily as Greek, and five minutes’
study in an Egyptian gallery of any museum should be enough to convince any
educated man."




A. H. Sayce – Oxford University



"It is difficult to deal seriously with Joseph Smith’s impudent fraud. The
facsimile from the Book of Abraham No. 2 is an ordinary hypocephalus, but the
hieroglyphics upon it have been copied so ignorantly that hardly one of them is
correct. I need scarcely say that Kolob, &c., are unknown to the Egyptian
language. Smith has turned the goddess into a king and Osiris into Abraham."




Flinders Petrie – London University



"They are copies of Egyptian subjects of which I have seen dozens of examples.
They are centuries later than Abraham. The attempts to guess a meaning for them
in the professed explanations are too absurd to be noticed. It may be safely
said that there is not one single word that is true in these explanations."




James H. Breasted – Haskell Oriental Museum, University of Chicago



It will be seen, then, that if Joseph Smith could read ancient Egyptian writing,
his ability to do so had no connection with the decipherment of hieroglyphics by
European scholars. The three facsimiles in question represent equipment which
will be and has been found in unnumbered thousands of Egyptian graves. The
point, then, is that in publishing these facsimiles of Egyptian documents as
part of an unique revelation to Abraham, Joseph Smith was attributing to Abraham
not three unique documents of which no other copies exist, but was attributing
to Abraham a series of documents which were the common property of a whole
nation of people who employed them in every human burial, which they prepared.
The “problem” is if I accept that the Book of Abraham merely “originated” with
the scrolls and is not an actual translation then I also have to try and accept
that God and Joseph decided to fool me into believing a true scripture by
telling me it was a translation when it was not a translation. I stewed in that
“God is an occasional liar for my benefit” paradigm for a few years. Certainly,
many LDS folks go through a similar process.



The ultimate cognitive dissonance here is that either God lies to convince me
his scripture is true or Joseph lies. I decided that Joseph lied, even if the
gospel he promoted is “good,” even if the Church has a good influence on peoples
lives, I was not going to believe in a God that lies to me to bolster his
claims; therefore, I conclude that Joseph was a fraud. I hope the true believers
in the Church understand that folks like me are not against them. I sincerely
hope the brethren find a way to navigate this human disaster that maintains many
of the positive, unique aspects of LDS culture. They should’ve started dealing
honestly with this issues a hundred years ago. Instead, we received “lying for
the lord” for 100 years and now we receive obfuscating for the lord. I suppose
I’ll call that an improvement, but we deserve better.


 

Samuel A. B. Mercer – Hibbard collection of Egyptian Reproductions at the
Western Theological Seminary



None of these, either human or divine, who helped in Joseph Smith’s translation,
had any conception of the most commonplace Egyptian Characters.


 

At the time of publication of the Book of Abraham, America still had not yet
received the Rosetta Stone’s translation of ancient Egyptian. Joseph’s
interpretation was unable to be verified at the time, and no one could argue its
accuracy.Once Egyptologists had the opportunity to study the papyri,they
commented that Joseph’s translations were incorrect and the Book of Abraham is
not what it claims to be. The modern Church has known for decades that this was
the case, yet has only now quietly admitted to it.












PART 4


THE MODERN CHURCH

 


CHAPTER 23


 TITHING







The definition and requirements of tithing have varied at different periods.
This chapter discusses tithing in the Old Testament, tithing in the early
Church, its initial requirement and intended purpose, and the modern
interpretation.




TITHING IN THE OLD TESTAMENT

Today sacrament meetings and General Conferences continually preach that
promised blessings come from faithfully paying our tithing, but is this Old
Testament law really applicable today? The scriptural basis for this teaching
comes from the book of Malachi in the Old Testament.


 

Malachi 3:8,10

Will a man rob God? Yet ye have robbed me. But ye say, Wherein have we robbed
thee? In tithes and offerings. …prove me now herewith, saith the Lord of hosts,
if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that
there shall not be room enough to receive it.


 

The previous chapters reveal that Malachi wasn’t talking to the general
membership of the Church when he asked, “Will a man rob God?“ but was rebuking
the priests who had been collecting money and food to give to the poor, but were
keeping it for themselves.


 

Malachi 2-3

And now, O ye priests, this commandment is for you

But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law;
ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the Lord of hosts.

… ye have not kept my ways, but have been partial in the law.

And [the Lord] shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver

Even from the days of your fathers ye are gone away from mine ordinances, and
have not kept them. Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the Lord
of hosts.

Will a man rob God? Yet ye have robbed me. But ye say, Wherein have we robbed
thee? In tithes and offerings.

Ye are cursed with a curse: for ye have robbed me, even this whole nation.


 

The tithes were already paid; the priests were simply stealing them. Malachi
promises them that if they would stop hoarding the offerings and bring all those
tithes into the storehouse to be properly distributed among the needy, God would
open the windows of heaven and pour out a blessing so abundant they might never
have to fear shortages in the storehouses again.

One thing to consider when the Church applies Old Testament laws to modern
standards is that Jesus fulfilled the Law of Moses and instituted the higher
law. No longer were Christians required to follow Old Testament laws, but were
now only to show love and charity to everyone.



Examples of other Old Testament laws that no longer apply.

Acceptable to murder a non-virgin

Deuteronomy 22:13-21 If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her.
Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the
tokens of the damsel’s virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate… But if
this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel…
Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the
men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die.




Acceptable to beat your slave to death

Exodus 21:20-21 When a man strikes his slave, male or female, with a rod and the
slave dies under his hand, he shall be avenged. But if the slave survives a day
or two, he is not to be avenged, for the slave is his money.




Animal sacrifices

Samuel 7:9 And Samuel took a sucking lamb, and offered it for a burnt offering
wholly unto the Lord.




No eating pork

Leviticus 11:7 And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted,
yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you.




No eating shellfish

Leviticus 11:10-11 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the
rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the
waters, they shall be an abomination unto you.




No eating pawed-animals

Leviticus 11:27 And whatsoever goeth upon his paws, among all manner of beasts
that go on all four, those are unclean unto you.




No mixed-plant gardens

Leviticus 19:19 Ye shall keep my statutes… thou shalt not sow thy field with
mingled seed.




No mixed-fabric clothing

Leviticus 19:19 Ye shall keep my statutes… neither shall a garment mingled of
linen and woollen come upon thee.




Mandatory circumcision

Leviticus 12:2-3 And on the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be
circumcised.




Netting installed around your home

Deuteronomy 22:8 When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a
battlement for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thine house, if any man
fall from thence.


 

Are members today required to follow the Law of Moses, like the Pharisees, to be
approved for a temple recommend? No, because Latter-Day Saints, like all modern
Christians, were taught by Christ to not be bound by these archaic rules, but
instead to love unconditionally.



If paying tithes to the sons of Levi at the temple was also an Old Testament
law, then why is tithing a modern practice? It turns out that the Catholic
Church reinstituted the law of tithing over 500 years after Jesus put an end to
all Old Testament laws.



“As the Church expanded and various institutions arose, it became necessary to
make laws which would insure the proper and permanent support of the clergy. The
payment of tithes was adopted from the Old Law… The earliest positive
legislation on the subject seems to be contained in the letter of the bishops
assembled at Tours in 567 and the [canons] of the Council of Macon in 585.”

The Catholic Encyclopedia


 

Since Catholic clergy are forbidden to marry, they did not have families to
support and could devote all of their time to religious studies and managing the
affairs of the church. It then “became necessary to make laws which would insure
the proper and permanent support of the clergy.” However, Jesus never taught to
pay tithing to any religious institution; in fact, he taught to give directly to
those in need.


 

Matthew 25:35,36,40

I was hungry and you gave me meat; I was thirsty, and you gave me drink; I was a
stranger, and you took me in; naked, and you clothed me; I was sick, and you
visited me; I was in prison and you came unto me. Inasmuch as you have done it
unto the least of these my brethren, you have done it unto me.


 

 


TITHING IN THE EARLY CHURCH

On December 7, 1836, Bishop Edward Partridge officially instituted tithing and
defined it as 2% of the net worth of each member after deducting debts. This
money was to help cover the operating expenses of the Church. It appears to have
been adequate for a time. Two years later, when the Church was eight years old,
some 15,000 converts had already emigrated from their homes and gathered in
Missouri. Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon were spending all their time dealing
with this large flow of immigrants, to the point of not being able to provide
for their own families. On May 12th they took the matter before the high council
of the Church. Joseph Smith states,


 

“Saturday, 12.—President Rigdon and myself attended the High Council for the
purpose of presenting for their consideration some business relating to our
pecuniary concerns. We stated to the Council our situation, as to maintaining
our families, and the relation we now stand in to the Church, spending as we
have for eight years, our time, talents, and property, in the service of the
Church: and being reduced as it were to beggary, and being still detained in the
business and service of the Church, it appears necessary that something should
be done for the support of our families by the Church, or else we must do it by
our own labors; and if the Church say to us, “Help yourselves,” we will thank
them and immediately do so; but if the Church say, “Serve us,” some provision
must be made for our sustenance.”

History of the Church, vol.3 p.32


 

What emerged was a guideline of how much members were to contribute money to
help maintain the operations of the Church. In July of 1838, Joseph recorded
what would later become section 119 of the Doctrine and Covenants – The Law of
Tithing.


 

Doctrine and Covenants Section 119

1 Verily, thus saith the Lord, I require all their surplus property to be put
into the hands of the bishop of my church in Zion,

2 For the building of mine house, and for the laying of the foundation of Zion
and for the priesthood, and for the debts of the Presidency of my Church.

3 And this shall be the beginning of the tithing of my people.

4 And after that, those who have thus been tithed shall pay one-tenth of all
their interest annually; and this shall be a standing law unto them forever, for
my holy priesthood, saith the Lord.

5 Verily I say unto you, it shall come to pass that all those who gather unto
the land of Zion shall be tithed of their surplus properties, and shall observe
this law, or they shall not be found worthy to abide among you.

6 And I say unto you, if my people observe not this law, to keep it holy, and by
this law sanctify the land of Zion unto me, that my statutes and my judgments
may be kept thereon, that it may be most holy, behold, verily I say unto you, it
shall not be a land of Zion unto you.

7 And this shall be an ensample unto all the stakes of Zion. Even so. Amen.


 

The Law of Tithing, as presented to the membership of the Church in Section 119,
addresses two major points:

1. How much was required to donate. 2. Where the money was to be spent.



Required donation:

“I require all their surplus property”

“one-tenth of all their interest”

“Zion shall be tithed of their surplus”



Surplus – “that which remains when use is satisfied”. Interest – “any surplus
advantage.” (Webstersdictionary1828.com) The words interest and surplus are used
as synonyms. According to Joseph Smith Translation Genesis 14:39, “Abram paid
unto him tithes of all that he had, of all the riches which he possessed, which
God had given him more than that which he had need.” Abraham gave only a tenth
of his surplus; or a tenth from the amount that was more than the amount he
needed. It seems apparent that Section 119 intended a full-tithe to be paid from
the money left over after expenses are covered.



Where the money was to be spent:

“For the building of the Lord’s house”

“For the laying of the foundation of Zion and for the priesthood”

“For the debts of the Presidency of the Church”



Notice there is nothing stating that tithing is for the helping of the poor or
for humanitarian aid. That’s because members are also commanded to contribute
fast offerings, which are charitable donations in addition to tithing.


If fast offerings are for humanitarian aid, then the purpose of tithing is to
pay for the costs of managing the Church’s affairs. Members are expected to
contribute their share of the operational costs of the Church. As with any extra
chickens and eggs a pioneer family would not be hard-shipped to give, the
original law of tithing made it easy to give. Paying it was never intended to
place a large burden on anyone. In the scriptures, God never required his people
to pay him first, or to give to the Church before meeting the temporal needs of
their families. Then where did this modern idea come from?


 


POST-JOSEPH SMITH

For three years following Joseph Smith’s death many men struggled for control of
the Church. Before becoming president of the Church, Brigham Young and the other
Twelve Apostles decided to dramatically overhaul Joseph’s original tithing
requirements. No longer was tithing 10% of the money one had left over after
paying expenses, now any new members were required to donate 10% of all of their
possessions at the time of baptism, and all members had to pay 10% of their
entire income. The Twelve also voted to exempt themselves and the two general
bishops of the Church from any future obligation to pay tithing. Tithing
donation plummeted after this new requirement. Struggling pioneer families could
not afford to give more tithing than they already were.



During this time the United States government passed the Edmunds-Tucker Act.
Although polygamy was already illegal, the act stated that any religious
institution involved int eh practice of polygamy were subject to seizure of all
property above $50,000. In an effort to save their property the Church voted to
discontinue the practice of polygamy.



In addition to these financial hardships, the Church was also facing massive
losses in real estate, banking, mining, sugar and investment firms. On top of
that, educational and civic responsibilities were also draining the budget.
During 1893 the Church started borrowing from outside financial institutions to
pay its debts.



The Church was on the brink of bankruptcy and President Lorenzo Snow yielded to
another tithing reformation in an effort to meet its liabilities. He cancelled
the requirement to give 10% of one’s property at baptism and another 10% upon
arrival into Salt Lake. From that point on tithing would be limited to 10% of
one’s annual income according to their ability to pay. (Journal of Mormon
History, vol. 20, Utah State University)


 


MODERN INTERPRETATION

After the reformation tithing donation again began to rise. The Church also
hired outside financial experts to guide them into more successful investments.
Soon the threat of bankruptcy passed as the Church began seeing large returns on
their new financial strategies. Today Church-owned businesses help contribute to
an annual income that reaches into the tens of billions. Since the Church is no
longer struggling to meet its financial obligations, should the requirement of
tithing be revisited once again?,



While the requirements have not changed since President Snow’s revision, the
tone of the leadership has. Let’s look at how the brethren viewed tithing in the
past and how it’s taught today.



Original Teachings



“If a man has not the means to pay tithing and would if he could, I can
fellowship him just as well as if he did.”

Brigham Young, March 13 1860. Mar.13 1860, Office Journal: Book D, p. 54.



“I may be pardoned, perhaps, if I say here, for the benefit of any who do not
know the facts, that the law of tithing is a voluntary law; that is, it imposes
only a voluntary duty upon the people. No person’s standing as a member of the
Church is jeopardized because he doesn’t pay his tithing…. I want to tell you
that, we will be honest with you; we feel that it is the first duty of
Latter-day Saints to take care of themselves, and of their poor; and then, if we
can extend it to others…. but first look after the members of our own
household.”

President Joseph F. Smith, General Conference, April 1915.
https://archive.org/stream/conferencereport1915a/conference
report851chur#page/9/mode/1up




Current teachings



Is there a level of poverty so low that sacrifice should not be expected or a
family so destitute that paying tithing should cease to be required? Like the
widow, if a destitute family is faced with the decision of paying their tithing
or eating, they should pay their tithing.

Elder Lynn G. Robbins. Tithing—a Commandment Even
for the Destitute, April 2005 General Conference


 

If paying tithing means that you can’t pay for water or electricity, pay
tithing. If paying tithing means that you can’t pay your rent, pay tithing. Even
if paying tithing means that you don’t have enough money to feed your family,
pay tithing.

Elder Aaron L. West, Sacred Transformations, December 2012, Ensign


 

The difference between statements from early leaders and their sympathy for
those in need, compared to modern leadership that requires payment at all costs
while your children go hungry, brings tears to my eyes.



At the October 1899 General Conference, President Lorenzo Snow delivered a talk
on tithing.



“I plead with you in the name of the Lord, and I pray that every man, woman and
child who has means shall pay one tenth of their income as a tithing…”

Conference Report, October 1899, p.28.
http://archive.org/stream/conferencereport1899sa/conferencereport692chur#page/
28/mode/2up)


 

Again, the early brethren knew some were so burdened they had no means to pay.
However, an edited version of this statement was reprinted in the lesson manual
Teachings of the Presidents of the Church: Lorenzo Snow, ch.12: Tithing, a Law
For Our Protection and Advancement.



“I plead with you in the name of the Lord, and I pray that every man, woman and
child … shall pay one tenth of their income as a tithing”

Teachings of Lorenzo Snow manual, p.160.
www.lds.org/manual/teachings-of-presidents-of-the-church-lorenzosnow/chapter-12-tithing-a-law-for-our-protection-and-advancement?lang=eng




The removal of the phrase “who has means” demonstrates that the modern Church is
not above misrepresenting the truth to ensure being paid above the individual
needs of members. Jesus taught that we should directly help those in need,
Joseph taught that tithing was only payable on the surplus income after all
other living expenses were covered, other early leaders taught that if a person
did not have the ability to pay they did not have to, yet the modern leaders
expect to be paid even if it means that the members go hungry.





Ch. 22

Part 4

Ch. 23

Ch. 24


CHAPTER 24


CHURCH SPENDING







Today we are reminded in every meeting and conference to pay tithing, but while
we know that a portion is used for the operational expenses of the Church, much
of the donations make their way into business investments. According to a 2012
investigative report by the Reuters news agency, the Church receives about $7
billion in tithing revenue each year and several billion from its for-profit
business ventures. The lack of financial transparency by the LDS Church has put
revenue estimates between $10-20 billion annually.



This chapter covers a small portion of its non-religious business investments.


 


NON-RELIGIOUS BUSINESS INVESTMENTS

What are the Church’s for-profit business ventures? For a start, they own the
largest cattle ranch in the United States, with other large industrial ranches
and farms in Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and Great Britain. The Church
also owns a small media empire, an investment fund, the City Creek Center,
investment properties, and more.



City Creek Center




“City Creek Center, a three-block development by City Creek Reserve Inc., a
development arm of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. City Creek
Reserve is spending more than $1 million a day on construction, and the project
ultimately will cost around $3 billion” (Deseret News – Salt Lake City High Rise
is Ready for Occupancy on Main,11/4/2009)


 

While chapels and temples represent the religious, tax-exempt division of the
Church, the City Creek Center is a for-profit business. Even though City Creek
generates substantial income, the Church has re-classified it as a
501(C)3:Charitable Organization. Is it fair to classify the City Creek as a
charity organization to avoid paying taxes on property income it collects from
residential, office space, and retail store leases (such as Nordstrom, Apple,
Macy’s & Tiffany’s&Co)?
(http://irs990.charityblossom.org/990T/200912/208152281.pdf )




Downtown Philadelphia

“LDS Church to Develop 32-story Building in Downtown Philadelphia”
PHILADELPHIA — The LDS Church announced the construction of a 32-story City
Creek-style mixed-use building in downtown Philadelphia for residential and
commercial tenants. The 490,000 squarefoot tower at 1601 Vine Street will
include 271 market-rate apartments in the Center City district, a few blocks
from the iconic Philadelphia City Hall. (KSL NBC 5 Utah News,2/16/2014)




“Center City Philadelphia 2014- 2018 Developments” Developer: Property Reserve,
Inc. [LDS Church subsidiary] Location: 1601 Vine Street Residential Units: 277
Investment: $120 Million Description: The mixed-use development includes a
residential apartment tower located at 1601 Vine Street and a separate
Meetinghouse for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints at 17th and Vine
Streets. The residential tower is  a  32-story, new















Downtown Salt Lake City



“111 Main Street Tower Has New Developer”
SALT LAKE CITY — There has been a major change in the development of downtown
Salt Lake City’s newest proposed office tower. City Creek Reserve, a real estate
arm of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, has taken over as
developer of the 111 Main Street project. Hamilton, the commercial real estate
firm based in Itasca, Ill., had developed 222 Main — the 22-story, $125 million
office building located just a block away on the west side of the street. The
ground floor of the project will feature retail space, while the upper floors
will offer 440,000 rentable square feet of office area with the average floor
size consisting of 21,000- square-foot customizable sections, column-free
design, floor-to-ceiling glass, with 9-foot ceilings and 16-inch raised floors
throughout. DeseretNews, 2/27/2014


 

 

Florida Land




“Mormon Church Completes Huge Buy of Land, Now Owns 2 Percent of Florida”

The Mormon church through its subsidiaries now owns nearly 2 percent of Florida
with the completion Thursday of a $562 million purchase of more than 382,000
acres in North Florida’s Panhandle region. The mega purchase of most of the
timberland holdings of realestate developer St. Joe Co. was announced in
November. That property combined with Deseret Ranches in Central Florida leaves
the Utah-based Church with 678,000 acres in Florida. AgReserves Inc., a
taxpaying company of the church, said when the deal was first made public that
it will continue to use the  North  Florida  land  for  timber  and 
agriculture.



construction building of approximately 489,997sqft and will consist of 264
rental apartments, 13 rental town homes, two levels of below-grade parking
providing 238 spaces and 12,000sqft of ground-floor retail. Residential
amenities include a swimming pool, fitness center, clubroom and business center.
Robert A.M. Stern Architects of New York is the project designer, with BLT
Architects of Philadelphia serving as associate architect.

https://issuu.com/ccdphila/docs/ccdevelopments2015/28




Deseret Ranches has more than 40,000 cattle and is one of the nation’s largest
producers of calves.

Orlando Sentinel, 3/6/2014



“Mormon Church Moves to Build a City in Florida”
The Mormon church is going to Disney World. The church-owned Deseret Ranches is
going through the bureaucratic process in Florida to win approval to transform
rural farmland, used for 65 years to raise cattle, into a metropolis of a
half-million residents within a 133,000-acre corner of Osceola County, not far
from Orange County, the home of the world-renowned Disney resort in Orlando.
According to the Orlando Sentinel, theproject would be the biggest development
ever planned in Florida.

Salt Lake Tribune, 7/10/2015




 

The county only approved such a large purchase when the Church promised to keep
the land for farming and timber. After the acquisition. The Church changed the
plans to develop the lands for “half a million residents”.


 



Riverton UT

“Riverton sees Mormon Church Daybreak-like Project as ‘Crown Jewel”

City Council members voted unanimously for an agreement to develop about 550
acres of what is now open land owned by Suburban Land Reserve, a forprofit real
estate arm of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The plan, adopted
after years of discussion, provides for transforming the Hamilton Farm property
and adjacent acreage into a massive shopping center, office towers and business
nodes as well as nearly 3,800 homes, condominiums and apartments.

Salt Lake Tribune, 2/17/2016



Private Hunting Reserve



“Tending the Flock”

As a full-time missionary for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,
Clair Huff shed the traditional dark suit, white shirt and tie. For more than
two years, he and his wife,Beth, have been serving God in a most unusual way.
They operate a private hunting preserve owned by the LDS Church. “Just like the
farm derives revenue from harvesting crops, the preserve is designed to produce
revenue when hunters harvest the wildlife here,” Elder Huff said. The preserve,
known as Westlake Farm Commercial Hunting Area, is managed by the LDS  Church’s 
Farm  Management Co. The for-profit farming and  ranching (not intended
for Church  welfare  use)  is  overseen  by  the  church's



Presiding Bishopric. The church owns thousands of  acres of farm and ranch land
throughout the West, including the Deseret Land and Livestock Co., a private
big-game hunting preserve scattered over 200,000 acres in northern Utah. Hunters
from around the country vie for a limited number of elk and moose permits there
that cost as much as $8,500 each. 

Deseret News, 7/8/2000

Las Colinas TX



"New Las Colinas Apartment Community Sells to Mormon Investment Company"
Apartment builder JPI sold its new Jefferson Las Colinas, 286 unit, six-acre
apartment community to Utah-based Property Reserve Inc., a real estate
investment and development company owned by the of Church of Jesus Christ of
Latterday Saints, county deed records show. The terms of the sale were not
disclosed,  but the property  taxes value the  community  at  almost  $45 
million.  The 



apartment community has been  renamed  Fountain Pointe Las Colinas on Las
Colinas Blvd. just north of Northwest Highway.                                 
                                             Dallas News, 7/25/2016

Ratheon Corporate Campus



"Raytheon’s Richardson campus at CityLine sells to real estate arm of Mormon
Church"

Raytheon Corp.’s new office campus in Richardson’s $1.5 Billion CityLine project
has sold. It’s been purchased by Property Reserve Inc., a real estate and
investment arm of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Finished in
early 2016, the four-story [multi building] office campus houses almost  1,700 
workers  for  Raytheon,  the  Mass-





achusetts based high-tech and defense manufacturer. The Mormon Church bought the
Raytheon offices from Dallas-based developer KDC.                               
                                                  Dallas News, 8/7/2017

Lake Park Corporate Center



Utah Property Management Associates (UPMA), formerly Zions Securities
Corporation, is a subsidiary of Property Reserve Inc., which manages properties
owned by The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints in Salt Lake City, Utah. They manage major corporate,
residential, and retail spaces along with parking lots and plazas.

 

Live/Work Environment – Lake Park corporate Center provides employees numerous
housing options. From new town homes, class ‘A’ apartments and single family
homes, there is a price point for everyone.

 

Amenities – Shopping, dining, Cinemark theater, schools and a hotel are all part
of the Lake Park Corporate Center experience. Target, Walmart, Kohls, Michaels,
PetsMart, Cafe Rio, Chilis, and Starbucks just to name a few are all within
minutes down Lake Park Blvd.



Corporate Campus – Some of the world’s finest and most recognized corporations
call Lake Park Corporate Center their home. Discover Card, United Health Care,
Verizon and Intermountain Health Care to name a few.

 

No other office park campus provides this kind of continuity in a master planned
environment.

The Church’s for-profit businesses include multiple real estate firms,
commercial land holdings, banking institutions, insurance companies, financial
advising firms, newspapers, radio stations, cable channels, and many more. Every
year billions of tithing dollars are funneled into these businesses for
non-religious and non-humanitarian aid purposes.


CHARITABLE DONATIONS

Where these funds are not being spent: Between 1985-2011 the Church donated a
total of $1.4 billion on humanitarian aid. This includes international
disasters, welfare service missionaries and  bishops  store  houses. 
 www.lds.org/bc/content/shared/

content/english/pdf/welfare/2011-welfare-services-actsheet.pdf

The $1.4B figure includes the value of thousands of labor-hours donated by the
members in events such as Mormon Helping Hands. While this figure is something
to be proud of, we must look at how the LDS Church, that generates double-digit
billion-dollar revenue each year, compares to other charitable organizations.

 

In 2014, The American Red Cross received $2.9 billion in donations and dispersed
$2.7 billion in aid and services, the balance covering administration and
fundraising expenses. www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&org

id=3277#.VxlWWSMrKPQ



The Red Cross donates over 93 cents for every dollar received. In comparison,
the Church donates between half and 1 penny for every dollar received.



The leaders of the Church continually remind us that Jesus Christ himself is at
the head, yet we see such a contrast in his teachings compared to the Church’s
pursuit of money.

Luke 18:18-23

And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit
eternal life?

Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not
steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother.

And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up.

Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing:
sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have
treasure in heaven: and come, follow me.

And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich.



 

Matthew 25:35-40

For I was an hungered, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink:
I was a stranger, and ye took me in:

Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison and ye
came unto me.

Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord when saw we thee an hungered,
and fed thee? Or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

When saw we thee a stranger and took thee in? Or naked and clothed thee?

Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?

And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as
ye have done it unto the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.



If showing charity for the less fortunate is truly a personal goal, then perhaps
members should donate money directly where we feel it will do the most good. Do
we really believe that Jesus would require his church to build multi-billion
dollar business properties instead of hospitals, homeless shelters and schools?


 


 


 


CHAPTER 25


 SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE







Many scientific disciplines such as geology, astronomy, paleontology, and
biology, have given us a great deal of information about the nature of the
Earth. This chapter briefly discusses the Church’s opposing views regarding the
age of the Earth, evolution and the existence of death before Adam and Eve.




AGE OF THE EARTH AND EVOLUTION



Ch. 25


Fossils are mainly found in sedimentary rock such as the layers of the Grand
Canyon. Sedimentary rock is formed when layers of sediment are deposited on top
of one another. Strata can range from less than an inch thick to hundreds of
feet thick. The deepest layers were formed first and are the oldest and those on
top formed more recently. Geologists use radiometric dating to determine the age
of the rock layer in which fossils are found. Due to erosion or tectonic
shifting, exposed strata can be seen on canyons, cliffs, mountains, or cutbanks.
Each layer represents a certain time period in history. The fossils found in
each layer are the plants and animals that lived during that period.



The oldest layers of rock we find on the Earth are about 4 billion years old and
are void of any fossilized life. The oldest evidence of life are fossils of
single-celled bacteria that are found in rock dating 3.4 billion years old. For
nearly the next billion years, fossils show no multicellular life at all.



In rocks dating 580 million years old, beginning the Cambrian era, we finally
find the first fossils of multicellular animals. We begin to see very simple
organisms like sea sponges and anemones. Around 20 million years later we find
simple mollusks and worms. Another 15 million years later the very first
vertebrates appear, beginning with small worm-like animals and onto simple fish.
In 410 million year old sediment, more familiar jawed fish begin to appear.



The Earth’s sediments, up until about 400 million years ago, contain no land
animals. The Devonian period marks the arrival the first evidence of insects.
For the next 100 million years there are no reptiles, birds or mammals, only
amphibians and insects. Plant life during this period only shows the existence
of simple ferns, no seed-bearing plants.



Finally during the Mesozoic era (Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous periods:
250-65 million years ago) fossils show the rise and fall of the dinosaurs.After
the large predators became extinct, the environment allowed for the remaining
small animals to flourish. Animals resembling mammals begin to be found about
190 million years ago. The first trees begin to be found in rock layers dating
to about 65 million years ago. During this time we also find the emergence of
modern birds from small-feathered reptiles.

The “Homo” genus first appeared about 2.8 million years ago, marking the dawning
of early humans. About 1.9 million year ago we find skeletal remains in eastern
Africa showing fully upright features. Neanderthals began about 300,000 years
ago, and by 200,000 years ago, we begin to find anatomically modern human
skeletal remains. This marks the arrival of Homo s. sapiens, our current version
of spices.





THE ORIGINAL CLAIMS

Evolution

“It is held by some that Adam was not the first man upon this Earth, and that
the original human being was a development from lower orders of the animal
creation. These, however, are the theories of men.”

First Presidency Statement – “The Origin of Man”, 1909



“I will state frankly and positively that I am opposed to the present biological
theories and the doctrine that man has been of the earth for millions of years.
I am opposed to the present teachings in relation to the age of the earth, which
declare that the earth is millions of years old. Naturally, since I believe in
modern revelation, I cannot accept these so-called scientific teachings, for I
believe them to be in conflict with the simple and direct word of the Lord that
has come to us by divine revelation.”

Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, vol.1, pp101-103

 

“I say most emphatically, you cannot believe in this theory of the origin of
man, and at the same time accept the plan of salvation as set forth by the Lord
our God. You must choose the one and reject the other, for they are in direct
conflict and there is a gulf separating them which is so great that it cannot be
bridged, no matter how much one may try to do so.”

Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, v.1, pp141-42

 

Age of the Earth

Doctrine and Covenants section 77 has a unique Q&A session between Joseph and
God. In verse 6 Joseph poses two questions and records two answers.

 

Doctrine and Covenants 77: 6

Q. What are we to understand by the book which John saw, which was sealed on the
back with seven seals?

A. We are to understand that it contains the revealed will, mysteries, and the
works of God; the hidden things of his economy concerning this earth during the
seven thousand years of its continuance, or its temporal existence.

Q: What are we to understand by the seven seals with which it is sealed?

A: We are to understand that the first seal contains the things of the first
thousand years, and the second also of the second thousand years, and so on
until the seventh.

 

President Joseph Fielding Smith clarifies the term “temporal existence.”

“Here is a definite statement by revelation to us that this Earth will go
through 7,000 years of temporal existence. Temporal, by all interpretations,
means passing, temporary, or mortal.”

Joseph Fielding Smith – Doctrines of Salvation, vol.1, p. 80

 

Death Before Adam and Eve

“If, for example, a student accepts the untrue theory that death has been
present on the earth for scores of thousands or millions of years, he must
reject the revealed truth that there was no death either for man or animals or
plants or any form of life until some 6000 years ago when Adam fell.”

Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrinal New Testament Commentary 3:95-96;
Mormon Doctrine, 2nd ed., 681

 

“There was no death in the world for him or for any form of life until after the
Fall; that the Fall of Adam brought temporal and spiritual death into the world;
that this temporal death passed upon all forms of life, upon man and animal and
fish and fowl and plant life.”

Bruce R. McConkie, BYU, June 1, 1980

 

“From the revelations of the Lord we learn that there was no death in this world
before the transgression of Adam and Eve.”

Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation vol.1, p101

 

“There was no death upon the earth, either vegetable, insect or animal, prior to
the fall of man, and that human life did not exist upon the earth prior to
Adam.”

Heber J. Grant, 1931 Statement of the First Presidency


 

Beginning in the oldest layers of rock and continuing up through newer layers,
the sequence of fossils shows a consistent pattern to the emerging levels of
life. Fossils of simpler organisms are encased in layers of rock that are very
old and very deep. Gradually, more complex life is found in younger, shallower
layers of rock. This sets the timeline for the evolution of life literally in
stone. Life and death occurred on this planet long before human existence. The
first sin could not have brought about the physical death of all living things
upon the face of the Earth from the creation until the time of Adam.


 


DISTANCING FROM PAST CLAIMS

The doctrine of the Church once assured us that the age of the Earth was less
than 7,000 years old, that evolution was false, and that no form of death
existed in this world before the creation of modern humans, but today the Church
has decided to distance itself from those past doctrines.



LDS Scientists Offer A Different Viewpoint



Dr. Michael F. Whiting – Director of the BYU DNA Sequencing Center and professor
of Integrative Biology.

“Many critics of evolution portray evolutionary theory as a series of made-up
stories that require just as much faith to believe in as any religion requires.
In fact, evolution is widely considered to be one of the most successful
scientific theories ever proposed because of its ability to elegantly explain a
plethora of biological observations.”


 

Dr. Bart Kowallis – BYU Dean of Physical and Math Sciences

“Students and the BYU community are reminded that organic evolution,
anthropogenic climate change, radiometric dating and a 4.56 billion year old
Earth are all seriously taught on campus by professors who are in good standing
with the Church, in fields directly relating to these subjects.”


 

After concluding that its stances on evolution and other scientific subjects
were in direct contrast to overwhelming data, again the Church decided to
invalidate the statements made by past prophets by taking a more neutral
position.

 

“The Church has no official position on the theory of evolution. Organic
evolution, or changes to species’ traits over time, is a matter for scientific
study. Nothing has been revealed concerning evolution. Though the details of
what happened on Earth before Adam and Eve, including how their bodies were
created, have not been revealed, our teachings regarding man’s origin are clear
and come from revelation.”

What Does The Church Believe About Evolution? – New Era, 2016

 

“While it is interesting to note these various theories, officially the Church
has not taken a stand on the age of the Earth. Therefore, while Latter Day
Saints are commanded to learn truth from many different fields of study an
attempt to establish any theory as the official position of the Church is not
justifiable.”

Old Testament Student Manual: Genesis-2Samuel, CES Religion 301, 2003


 


 


CONCLUSION







My dearest sweetheart, I love you with all my heart. I want you to know that you
are the most important thing in the world to me and your love and support mean
everything. I know that the love we share in our family is stronger than
anything else. I had to write you this letter to explain how I came to the
conclusion that the Church is not all it claims to be. Growing up in the Church,
I believed in the doctrine, history, organization and culture, and was taught to
disregard any information to the contrary. Shortly after reading the journals of
Joseph Smith and Brigham Young I began to come across original versions of
events that were very different than the lessons I have been taught. Truthful
information quickly became my obsession; the real truth, accurate historical
facts, not what appears nicely summarized or left out of Sunday School lessons.
I know learning about these issues can be difficult; it was hard for me too.
Finding out that there was so much that has been kept from of us made me feel
confused and betrayed. While I understand there are some good aspects about the
Church, I could no longer see how the Church could be true if it has not been
truthful. The weight of the whole situation was intense. During this difficult
and lonely time, I had to ask myself some hard questions.



If the Church weren’t true, would I want to know?

What is more important, the truth or staying in my comfort zone?

With what I now know, would I still believe in the Church if I hadn’t been born
into it?



After answering these questions honestly, I became at peace with what I felt was
the truth. The outcome is certainly not one I expected from the outset. It is
not an easy thing for a person to decide to re-examine their own beliefs or
accept that they’ve been wrong. Even though my beliefs have changed, you and I
still share the same values such as the importance of family, honesty and
integrity. My decision to leave the Church was the product of years of research,
study, and prayer, but that was my personal journey, and I support your own
journey even if it might be different than mine.

 

I LOVE YOU



conclusion


























Letter For My Wife  © 2024                                                     
                                           

bottom of page