www.washingtonpost.com Open in urlscan Pro
96.16.159.126  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Accessibility statementSkip to main content
Search Navigation
Democracy Dies in Darkness

Subscribe

Sign in



Advertisement


Close
The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness
Elections
Midterms 2022
Results by stateChevronDown
Senate
House
Governors
Abortion access
Election deniers
Where votes remain
CONTROL OF CONGRESS

Updated Nov. 16 at 8:56 p.m. Eastern

Full election results

50

Democrats now hold 50 out of 100 seats in the Senate. 36 of those Democratic
seats were not up for election this year. The Democrats have gained 1 seat they
did not previously hold.

+1

Democrats are projected to keep control of the Senate

Check
50
49

Republicans now hold 49 out of 100 seats in the Senate. 29 of those Republican
seats were not up for election this year. The Republicans have lost 1 seat they
previously held.

-1
Democrats36 seats not up for election
Senate
Republicans29 seats not up for election

* AP has called Alaska Senate for the GOP.

211

Democrats now hold 211 out of 435 seats in the House. The Democrats have lost 9
seats they previously held.

-9
218
218

Republicans now hold 218 out of 435 seats in the House. The Republicans have
gained 9 seats they did not previously hold.

+9

Republicans are projected to win control of the House

Check
Democrats
House
Republicans

LEAD/WON

Democrat

Republican

Democracy in America


ELECTION DENIERS LOSE RACES FOR KEY STATE OFFICES IN EVERY 2020 BATTLEGROUND


THE CANDIDATES COULD HAVE GAINED POWER OVER ELECTION ADMINISTRATION. VOTERS
REJECTED THEM IN THE SIX MOST PIVOTAL STATES.

By Amy Gardner
, 
Reis Thebault
and 
Robert Klemko
 
Updated November 13, 2022 at 9:29 p.m. EST|Published November 13, 2022 at 4:00
a.m. EST

Nevada secretary of state candidate Cisco Aguilar, a Democrat, was projected to
have defeated Republican nominee Jim Marchant. (David Becker for The Washington
Post)
Listen
12 min
Comment on this story
Comment
2110
Gift Article
Share

Voters in the six major battlegrounds where Donald Trump tried to reverse his
defeat in 2020 rejected election-denying candidates seeking to control their
states’ election systems this year, a resounding signal that Americans have
grown weary of the former president’s unfounded claims of widespread fraud.


Congressional districts have changed. Find yours for the 2022 midterm
elections.ArrowRight


Candidates for secretary of state in Michigan, Arizona and Nevada who had echoed
Trump’s false accusations lost their contests on Tuesday, with the latter race
called Saturday night. A fourth candidate never made it out of his May primary
in Georgia. In Pennsylvania, one of the nation’s most prominent election deniers
lost his bid for governor, a job that would have given him the power to appoint
the secretary of state. And in Wisconsin, an election-denying contender’s loss
in the governor’s race effectively blocked a move to put election administration
under partisan control.



Trump-allied Republicans mounted a concerted push this year to win a range of
state and federal offices, including the once obscure office of secretary of
state, which in many instances is a state’s top election official.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Some pledged to “decertify” the 2020 results, although election law experts said
that is not possible. Others promised to decommission electronic voting
machines, require hand-counting of ballots or block all mail voting. Their
platforms were rooted in Trump’s disproven claims that the 2020 race was rigged,
and their bids for public office raised grave concerns about whether the popular
will could be subverted, and free and fair elections undermined, in 2024 and
beyond.

Election administrators and voting rights advocates said the rebuke of election
deniers seeking state-level office was a refreshing course correction by U.S.
voters, whose choice of more seasoned and less extreme candidates reflected a
desire for stability and a belief that the nation’s elections are in fact
largely secure.

“This was a vote for normalcy,” said Georgia Secretary of State Brad
Raffensperger (R), who prevailed against a Democratic opponent Tuesday after
defeating U.S. Rep. Jody Hice in the spring primary. Hice, who was endorsed by
Trump, spent the campaign attacking Raffensperger for refusing to block Joe
Biden’s 2020 win in Georgia.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Voters “were looking for and rewarded character,” Raffensperger said. “They were
looking for people who could get the job done. They rewarded competence.”

Elsewhere, the losers included Doug Mastriano for governor in Pennsylvania, as
well as three candidates for secretary of state — Mark Finchem of Arizona, Jim
Marchant in Nevada and Kristina Karamo of Michigan — all of whom sought to
overturn the 2020 result. Losing gubernatorial contender Tim Michels in
Wisconsin would have had the power to push a Republican plan to eliminate the
bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission and transfer election administration
to the secretary of state or another partisan office.

Of the five who were defeated in the general election, only Michels and
Mastriano had conceded as of Sunday.

Story continues below advertisement



“Difficult to accept as the results are, there is no right course but to
concede, which I do,” Mastriano said in a statement issued Sunday afternoon. He
called on supporters to give his opponent, Democratic Attorney General Josh
Shapiro, “the opportunity to lead.”

Advertisement


Even though the others have not conceded, most have stopped short of claiming
that fraud had tainted their races. Their muted reaction to Tuesday’s outcomes
suggested that attacking the integrity of American elections is not a winning
formula, at least for state office, voting rights advocates said.

“Republicans are tired,” said Democrat Cisco Aguilar, who was projected late
Saturday to have defeated Marchant in Nevada. “They’re seeing that it’s not a
winning path. I think they’re hearing the voters.”

Tracking which election deniers are winning, losing in the midterms

As workers in Clark County, Nev., scrambled to count a batch of remaining mail
ballots, elections chief Joe Gloria told reporters Saturday that no
election-denying candidates had lodged any complaints. Hours later, after
officials released new vote totals, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D) was
projected to win reelection, edging past Adam Laxalt (R), a former state
attorney general, and delivering Democrats an expected majority in the next
Senate.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Laxalt tweeted earlier on Saturday that it appeared the new batches of votes
could block his path to victory.

“If they are GOP precincts or slightly DEM leaning then we can still win,”
Laxalt tweeted, in language that signaled a willingness to accept the results
even if his opponent won. “If they continue to trend heavy DEM then she will
overtake us.”

It was a dramatic contrast to Laxalt’s rhetoric in 2020, when he helped Trump
try to overturn Biden’s victory in Nevada, in part by falsely claiming that
heavily Democratic batches of mail ballots were illegally dumped into the count
after Election Day.

“It’s positive for our country when losers of elections accept their defeat,”
said Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold. “American democracy is
predicated on that. It’s also good at this point that they’re not flagrantly
denying the result.”

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Although many candidates denying the outcome of the 2020 vote came up short in
their bids for state office, the U.S. House was a different matter. At least 150
election deniers were projected to win their House races as of Saturday — an
increase over the 139 Republicans who voted against the electoral college count
following the assault on the U.S. Capitol by a pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6, 2021.

Overall, more than 170 election deniers on the ballot for the U.S. House, Senate
and key statewide offices were projected to win their elections as of Sunday,
according to a Washington Post analysis. The Post identified candidates as
election deniers if they questioned Biden’s victory, opposed the counting of
Biden’s electoral college votes, expressed support for a partisan post-election
ballot review, signed onto a lawsuit seeking to overturn the 2020 result or
attended or expressed support for the rally on the day of the Jan. 6 attack on
the U.S. Capitol.

“Election denialism is not going away overnight,” Griswold said. “The attacks on
voting rights and the attacks on American democracy will not stop.”



Still, many voters said in interviews that defeating such candidates was a
driving force in their votes on Tuesday. Andrew Haber, a 53-year-old child
psychologist in Arizona, didn’t vote in the primary election, but he cast his
ballot for Democrats after being alarmed by conspiracy theories advanced by the
Republican candidate for governor, Kari Lake, and her fellow conservatives.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



“When you abandon the process, then how do you steer the ship back in a
democratic way?” Haber, a Democrat, said at a polling place in Paradise Valley,
outside of Phoenix. “I’m still hopeful we can right the ship, but it would be
really hard to do once we have more people holding the levers of power that
don’t believe in democracy.”

Matt Kroski, a 43-year-old who has voted for both parties, said he was disturbed
by “voter intimidation” efforts he saw Republicans embrace, including armed
observers at ballot drop boxes in nearby Mesa. He saw his votes for Democrats in
his neighborhood north of Phoenix as an insurance policy for democratic norms.

“I just feel that after the whole ‘Stop the steal,’ it’s very much ‘I didn’t
lose, you stole,’ ” Kroski said. “At the end of a sporting game, we know who the
winners and losers are, who scored more points, who got more votes. I’m hoping
that things stay in place so that at least our votes will count.”

Finchem’s Democratic opponent, Adrian Fontes, had won more votes as of Saturday
evening than any other candidate on the Arizona ballot — even the ones in hotly
contested races for U.S. Senate and governor.



In an interview, Fontes said he had built a broad coalition that included
moderate Republicans and independents. But he also conceded that his success had
as much to do with what he wasn’t. “I’m not an insurrectionist,” he said,
contrasting his public image with that of Finchem, who is a member of the
extremist Oath Keepers group and was photographed outside of the U.S. Capitol
during the Jan. 6 attack.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



“I think a lot of civic-minded Republicans really didn’t like what Mark Finchem
stands for and who he is,” Fontes said.

Finchem has not conceded and has criticized the “fake news” for calling his
election for Fontes while officials are still counting ballots. “You don’t quit
a marathon on mile 15,” he tweeted Saturday. “Same with elections — they are not
over until the last legal vote is counted.”

Griswold and others said several factors fueled what she described as a victory
for democracy. First was the quality of the election-denying candidates, who
embraced extremist views that most voters recognized and were motivated to
reject.

An additional factor was the fact that many Republicans — including Trump —
discouraged voters from casting their ballots by mail, a dubious strategy that
may have suppressed GOP turnout. Finchem went so far as to urge voters to turn
out only at the end of the day Tuesday and to vote provisionally — a convoluted
instruction that left some GOP strategists bewildered and alarmed.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Democrats were also aggressive in defining their opponents as election deniers
and spending money to emphasize the point. Aguilar spent $1 million airing an ad
called “Dangerous,” featuring various election-denying statements from Marchant
— and suggesting that the Republican would be willing to rig an election in the
future.

“If we get elected, their power is over,” Marchant can be seen saying in the ad.
Marchant is a founder of the America First Secretary of State Coalition, a group
of pro-Trump, election-denying candidates that included Finchem, Karamo and
Mastriano.



The Democratic Association of Secretaries of State and affiliated groups spent
historic sums — more than $24 million — on races in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan,
Minnesota and Nevada, said Griswold, who leads the political committee. Four
years ago, the group spent less than $3 million.

Even as many election-denying candidates have accepted their defeats quietly,
Trump has continued to try to stir up his supporters with unsubstantiated claims
that fraud is occurring in Nevada and Arizona as ballot counting continues in
both states.

“Clark County, Nevada, has a corrupt voting system (be careful Adam!), as do
many places in our soon to be Third World Country,” Trump wrote Thursday on his
social media site, Truth Social, referring to the Senate candidate, Laxalt.
“Arizona even said ‘by the end of the week!’ — They want more time to cheat!”

The government in Clark County, home to Las Vegas, published a response on its
Twitter account calling Trump’s claims “outrageous” and saying “he is obviously
still misinformed about the law and our election processes.”

But with Trump expected to announce plans to run for president again in 2024 as
soon as Tuesday, his attacks on voting systems are not likely to abate.

Aguilar said secretaries of state have more work ahead of them to tamp down
false election claims as 2024 approaches. One of his goals when he takes office
in January is to persuade the state legislature to make it a felony to harass or
intimidate Nevada election workers, he said. He also hopes to build
relationships with election officials in all 17 Nevada counties, including the
heavily Republican counties outside of Reno and Las Vegas that are home to many
voters who are skeptical of the system.

“My opponent spent a lot of time telling lies, giving misinformation,” Aguilar
said. “It’s going to be my responsibility to go out there and break it down and
get people to understand that we do have safe and secure elections.”

Jesse Haw, a developer, former state senator and moderate Republican who lost to
Marchant in the GOP primary this year, criticized Democrats who spent money
elevating Marchant during the nominating battle — a strategy based on the idea
that Marchant would be easier to defeat in a general election.

“It was a calculated risk,” Haw said. “The Democrats that I talked to didn’t
like it. If this guy had won, it would have really hurt our state.”

But Haw acknowledged: “In this case it worked, so good for them, I guess.”

Haw was happy to share his choice for secretary of state on Tuesday.

“In this day and age, where we’re supposed to be one side or the other, I voted
for whoever I think is best for the people of Nevada,” Haw said. “And that
wasn’t Mr. Marchant.”

Thebault reported from Phoenix. Patrick Marley in Madison, Wis., and Azi
Paybarah in Washington contributed to this report.

2110 Comments
GiftOutline
Gift Article
Midterm elections
HAND CURATED
 * Live updates: Republicans win House control
   Earlier today
   
   
   Live updates: Republicans win House control
   Earlier today
 * Republicans narrowly win House, ending full Democratic control of Congress
   Earlier today
   
   
   Republicans narrowly win House, ending full Democratic control of Congress
   Earlier today
 * Senate, House control is split. Can a divided government make progress?
   Earlier today
   
   
   Senate, House control is split. Can a divided government make progress?
   Earlier today

View 3 more stories




Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan →


View more

Loading...
Advertisement


Advertisement

TOP STORIES
The Travel Enthusiast
Travel news, guides and tips for anyone looking to get away.
Frontier debuts all-you-can-fly pass for $599 — with caveats


UNESCO at 50: 24 World Heritage sites to see across America


What are your passenger rights in space?


Refresh
Try a different topic

Sign in or create a free account to save your preferences
Advertisement


Advertisement

Company
 * About The Post
 * Newsroom Policies & Standards
 * Diversity and Inclusion
 * Careers
 * Media & Community Relations
 * WP Creative Group
 * Accessibility Statement

Get The Post
 * 
 * Become a Subscriber
 * Gift Subscriptions
 * Mobile & Apps
 * Newsletters & Alerts
 * Washington Post Live
 * Reprints & Permissions
 * Post Store
 * Books & E-Books
 * Newspaper in Education
 * Print Archives (Subscribers Only)
 * e-Replica
 * Today’s Paper
 * Public Notices

Contact Us
 * Contact the Newsroom
 * Contact Customer Care
 * Contact the Opinions team
 * Advertise
 * Licensing & Syndication
 * Request a Correction
 * Send a News Tip
 * Report a Vulnerability

Terms of Use
 * Digital Products Terms of Sale
 * Print Products Terms of Sale
 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Settings
 * Submissions & Discussion Policy
 * RSS Terms of Service
 * Ad Choices

washingtonpost.com © 1996-2022 The Washington Post
 * washingtonpost.com
 * © 1996-2022 The Washington Post
 * About The Post
 * Contact the Newsroom
 * Contact Customer Care
 * Request a Correction
 * Send a News Tip
 * Report a Vulnerability
 * Download the Washington Post App
 * Policies & Standards
 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Settings
 * Print Products Terms of Sale
 * Digital Products Terms of Sale
 * Submissions & Discussion Policy
 * RSS Terms of Service
 * Ad Choices







THE WASHINGTON POST CARES ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

We and our partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique
IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your choices
by clicking below, including your right to object where legitimate interest is
used, or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will be signaled
to our partners and will not affect browsing data.


WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS DATA TO PROVIDE:

Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Select basic ads. Store
and/or access information on a device. Create a personalised ads profile. Select
personalised ads. Create a personalised content profile. Select personalised
content. Measure ad performance. Measure content performance. Apply market
research to generate audience insights. Develop and improve products. View list
of partners

I accept Disable all Manage cookies