drjohnrutledge.com Open in urlscan Pro
192.254.187.215  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

GET https://drjohnrutledge.com/

<form role="search" method="get" id="searchform" class="searchform" action="https://drjohnrutledge.com/">
  <div>
    <label class="screen-reader-text" for="s">Search for:</label>
    <input type="text" value="" name="s" id="s">
    <input type="submit" id="searchsubmit" value="Search">
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

DR. JOHN RUTLEDGE: FAR FROM EQUILIBRIUM ECONOMICS, FINANCE AND INVESTING

Economics and Finance for Investors
Skip to content
 * About John Rutledge
 * Book
 * Downloadable Articles
 * Archive
 * Contact

← Older posts



I CAN (A LITTLE MORE) SEE CLEARLY NOW

Posted on March 6, 2021 by John Rutledge

Summary: We know a lot more today than we did three months ago. We know the
occupants of the White House and Congress. We know which policies are likely to
become law; and we know roughly when we will be able to go back to work and
travel again. But there is still a lot we don’t know including when valuations
will return to more normal levels. In this piece I will lay out the implications
of what we know and what we don’t know for the economy and financial markets and
discuss a two-part investment strategy to help investors protect capital from
near-term valuation risk and take advantage of opportunities to acquire prime
assets at discount prices once government support policies have ended.

I chose this title for two reasons. First, we all know the words to Johnny
Nash’s 1972 anthem to optimism that has been recorded by literally everybody in
the music business, from Jimmy Cliff and Bob Marley to Ray Charles, Holly Cole,
and the Gospel Gangstas. Second, because after the past year, I feel like we
deserve “a bright, bright, sun-shiny day”. Apologies to Johnny Nash for my
alteration of his title—forty years of forecasting the economy have taught me
that humility is always a good idea.

Things We Know

We may not be able to see all obstacles in our way, but we know a lot more now
than we did three months ago when I was whining about driving in the fog. We
know the names of the President, the Vice President, the Senate Majority Leader,
the Speaker of the House, and most of the cabinet members. We know the
government is going to spend another two trillion dollars over the next few
months to support the economy. We know that tax rates on investment income are
going to go up, up, up. And we know that the Fed is going to keep printing its
brains out for the foreseeable future and never, ever raise interest rates
again. (#sarcasm)

We know there are vaccines that are highly effective against the COVID-19 virus
and have already jabbed them in more than 60 million arms. Disclosure: I got my
first jab of the Moderna vaccine along with 5000 of my closest friends in the
Disneyland parking lot (I parked in section Goofy-17) and the second one last
week. With U.S. vaccinations now averaging 2 million per day, and the Johnson &
Johnson vaccine now in the lineup, we can now see the path back to an economy
running at full (although diminished) capacity again. Heck, we even know a
little more about Brexit.

We know that U.S. politics are still going to be ugly. House managers presented
a damning case against ex-President Trump. Senate Republicans were divided
between those (7 of them) who were appalled by the January 6 insurrection on
Capitol Hill and those (43 of them) who were appalled by the prospect of not
getting any of the money that former President Trump raised on his way out the
door.

Regarding policy, the Democrats control the Senate, but only barely by counting
on Vice President Harris as a tie breaker, which means many of President Biden’s
proposed policies will be shrunk a size or two before they become law.
Investors, who don’t like radical change, find that to be a satisfactory
situation.

We know that it will take a number of years for the economy to fully recover
from the pandemic. Government support programs certainly cushioned the impact of
COVID-19 on the economy. Fiscal measures were so huge that average household
income between last March, when the lockdown started, and the end of the year
was higher than it was during the same months a year earlier. Last month, thanks
to $600 stimulus checks, payments form the government made up an astonishing 30%
of household income. Next month, when the $1400 checks are mailed, it will be
higher than that. Perhaps surprisingly, households stuck most of that extra
money in the bank, which gives them a mountain of cash to spend when they feel
comfortable again.

The support programs didn’t protect everybody. Even after an impressive
recovery, there are still 10 million people–largely in lower-income jobs in food
service, hospitality, and travel–who have lost their jobs as a result of the
pandemic, more than there were altogether at the pit of the 2008 Global
Financial Crisis.

Most of these people will find their way back to work once vaccinations have
proceeded and the virus has been largely contained. During this period all of
the reported measures of economic performance–GDP, revenues, earnings and cash
flow–will show very high growth rates by historical standards. But don’t be
fooled. GDP will still be below the level it would have been had there not been
a pandemic, both because a great deal of capital spending and resulting
productivity improvements did not happen during the crisis and because many
thousands of smaller companies went out of business during the pandemic. It will
take at least 3-5 years to grow back another population of small businesses to
take their place.

This forces us to admit that the extraordinary gains in stock prices over the
past year were almost entirely the result of the unprecedented monetary stimulus
by the Fed and other central banks that pushed interest rates to zero. If
interest rates were at pre-pandemic levels today, then stock prices would
be below pre-pandemic levels, which would more than erase the extraordinary
gains in stock prices over the past year. This means a bet that stock valuations
will remain at today’s inflated levels is a bet on a single point, that the Fed
will hold interest rates at zero for literally decades to come. The spike in
government bond yields over the past week shows that some investors are betting
they won’t.

For purposes of assessing the cost of capital sensitivity of stock prices, we
should think of the S&P 500 as a 50-year zero coupon bond. That makes stock
prices exquisitely sensitive to even the slightest change in interest rates, as
we saw last week when bond yields spiked higher. The duration, or time-weighted
average maturity of free cash flow of the S&P 500 companies is more than 50
years, longer than the maturity of the longest Treasury bond. The duration of
unprofitable, high-growth companies is even higher than that. A bet that
valuations will continue to rise from today’s exalted levels will only pay off
if the Fed pushes rates still lower for the foreseeable future–tough to do when
rates are close to zero already. History suggests that is unlikely to happen.

When interest rates rise one day, as they must, the stock market will go through
a significant correction. I believe that is likely to happen later this year
when government support payments end, households and businesses are once again
required to make rent, mortgage, auto loan, credit card and student loan
payments, and lenders are once again required to report bad loans and can
enforce loan contracts. When that happens, we will see a sharp increase in
distress sales that will create opportunities to buy prime assets at deep
discounts. That is when I want to be a buyer.

Recent bizarre activity in financial markets suggests the stock market
correction could come sooner rather than later. The tsunami of more than 10
million inexperienced retail investors with no experience managing risk who
entered the market over the past year has been playing havoc with stock prices.
We have seen spikes in IPOs, SPAC issues, options trading, and volatility. More
recently, flash mobs of apparently angry millennials have waged war on short
traders.

As I have written before, the analytical framework behind our investment
strategy (Rutledge, 2015) is based upon recent advances in physics known as
Complex Adaptive Systems (Mitchell, 2011). In the scientific literature on
complex systems (Prigogine, 1996), strange events like those I mentioned above
are statistical markers of an impending phase transition (Solé, 2011; Sornette,
2003). You can think of a phase transition as an avalanche, earthquake, tsunami,
or hurricane that produces sudden, violent change (Bak, 1996). In our framework,
a financial crisis is a phase transition from a state of general equilibrium to
a failed-network state caused by a sudden collapse of financial markets known as
a cascading network failure. (Barabasi, 2002)

The graphic, above, illustrates our approach applied to financial markets
applied to the Subprime Debt Crisis. After operating for some period at full
employment (the black segment to the left of point A), financial markets
experience a phase transition, the sudden seizure of activity known as a
cascading network failure in the network theory literature. In both nature and
financial markets, phase transitions (the blue segment A-B in the graphic) tend
to be short and violent, followed by a period (the red segment B-C) when the
economy appears to be stuck in recession, before the financial system
experiences an extended period of slow, steady network regrowth (the green
segment C-D) that ultimately returns the system to its most efficient state of
full employment or potential output. For more detail on both the theoretical
underpinnings of this approach and the statistical markers for financial crisis
I refer the reader to a more technical companion piece. (Rutledge, 2021a).

What Should Investors do at this point?

An investor’s most important job today is to contain risk by protecting capital
from loss during a sudden drop in valuations so he/she will have the liquid
firepower to take advantage of opportunities to buy prime assets at discount
prices when they are available.

I have applied our analytical framework to the current, COVID-driven, economic
crisis in the graphic above using the subprime debt crisis as a rough guide to
how long we might expect each of the stages to last once COVID-19 is behind us.
First, I believe the financial markets are ripe for a phase transition that is
likely to take place this year. Investors who have conserved cash and reduced
leverage will find great opportunities in distressed assets through 2022,
followed by an extended period of growth in both performance and valuations of
prime assets as financial markets recover. 

Our work shows that the most interesting opportunities will be in commercial
real estate, not in the stock market. Both the risk of higher inflation and the
likelihood of higher tax rates will incentivize investors to shift portfolio
allocations away from long-duration financial assets towards property and other
real assets. The real assets offering the most generous discounts are likely to
be urban real estate.

Urban Real Estate

Within real estate, we believe there will be an especially interesting
opportunity in urban properties, the eye of the COVID-19 pandemic hurricane.
Many today believe that the migration from the city to the suburbs we witnessed
during the COVID-19 pandemic is irreversible. We believe they are wrong for both
historical and economic reasons.

The history of plagues and pandemics far more serious than COVID-19 has been
well-documented (Koyama, 2019; Snowden, 2019). Examples include:

 1. the Plague of Athens in 430 BC,
 2. the Plague of Justinian in 541 AD that killed 25 million people,
 3. the Black Death of 1347 AD that killed half of Europe’s population,
    described by Boccaccio (1921) in Decameron,
 4. the Great Plague of London (1665 AD) that drove Isaac Newton from Cambridge
    to the countryside where he kept himself busy inventing differential
    calculus and the theory of optics and formulating the law of gravity,
 5. and the Spanish flu of 1918 that infected over one third of the world’s
    population and killed 25-50 million people.

In each case, frightened people migrated from the city to the countryside for
the duration of the pandemic. But the historical evidence is overwhelming. In
each case they came back to the city in greater numbers than before.

There are many reasons why people always come back to the city but foremost
among them is that people in cities are simply more productive. Density breeds
productive and creative activity. That’s why 80% of Americans live in urban
areas today and, according to United Nations projections, 80% of the people in
the entire world will live in urban areas by the year 2050 (UN-Habitat, 2020).

There is overwhelming scientific evidence showing economies of scale in
urbanization. For reasons detailed in my companion article reviewing both the
economics and scientific academic literatures on urbanization (Rutledge, 2021b),
doubling the population of a city increases per capita household income,
productivity, net worth, and creative activity by about 15% (Kempes, 2020). That
15% productivity advantage is true for all cities, in all countries, in all time
periods where there is adequate data (Bettencourt, 2010). The productivity
advantage can be viewed as a gravitational force that pulls the most energetic
and creative people to live and work in urban areas.

Once fear of COVID-19 has subsided, they will be back (Florida, 2020). When they
do, I would like to welcome them to the urban properties we will acquire during
the post-pandemic fire sale as their new landlord. Of course, full recovery of
cities, like full recovery of the economy, will take time so it is important to
be cautious in projections, modest in leverage, and disciplined in price.

JR

Selected References

Bak, P. (1996). How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality. New
York: Springer Verlag.

Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else
andWhat It Means. New York: Perseus Publishing

Bettencourt, L. W., Geoffrey. (2010). A Unified Theory of Urban
Development. Nature, 467, 912-913. 

Boccaccio, G. (1921). The Decameron (M. Rigg, Trans.). London: David Campbell.

Florida, R. (2020). This Is Not the End of Cities. Bloomberg CityLab. Retrieved
from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-06-19/cities-will-survive-pandemics-and-protests?sref=oolPz7y9

Kempes, C. W., Geoffrey. (2020). The Simplicity and Complexity of Cities. The
Bridge: Linking Engineeering and Society, 50(4). 

Koyama, M. J., R.; Johnson, N. (2019). Pandemics, Plagues, and Populations:
Evidence From the Black Death. Discussion Papers,  (13523). London.

Mitchell, M. (2011). Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Prigogine, I. (1996). The End of Certainty. New York: The Free Press.

Rutledge, J. (2015). Economics as energy framework: Complexity, turbulence,
financial crises, and protectionism. Review of Financial Economics. Retrieved
from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.02.003

Rutledge, J. (2021a, 2/15/21). Far-From-Equilibrium Economics and Finance.

Rutledge, J. (2021b, 2/15/21). The Impact of COVID-19 on Urbanization.

Snowden, F. M. (2019). Epidemics and Society: From the Black Death to the
Present. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Solé, R. V. (2011). Phase Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sornette, D. (2003). Critical Market Crashes. 378(1), 1–98.
doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00634-8

UN-Habitat. (2020). World Cities Report 2020. The Value of Sustainable
Urbanization. Retrieved
from https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/10/wcr_2020_report.pdf

Posted in All | Comments Off on I Can (a little more) See Clearly Now


INVESTMENT STRATEGY PART 2: ELECTION OUTLOOK AND IMPLICATIONS

Posted on October 19, 2020 by John Rutledge

Summary: We don’t have to wait long for clarity on the election. At this point
Biden is heavily favored to win and the Democrats have a high probability of
taking the Senate. Congress will pass his tax plan, which sharply increases tax
rates on investment income.

As I wrote in my last post, investors today are driving through heavy political
and economic fog, unable to see far enough ahead to make decisions. Some of the
fog, however is about to lift. With the election just three weeks away, we
aren’t going to have to wait long to learn the outcome. I won’t bore you with my
prediction but the odds-makers are becoming increasingly convinced that the
result will be a Biden victory.



Just what a Biden victory means for the economy depends on who controls the
Senate. A Republican majority in the Senate means they could block all major
legislation. As the graphic above shows, there are currently 47 Democrats and 53
Republicans in the Senate. There are 35 Senate seats–12 Democrats and 23
Republicans–up for grabs in this election. The Democrats need to add 4 seats to
control the Senate, but only 3 if Biden wins because the Vice President–in this
case Kamala Harris–votes to break a tie when necessary.

The Economist magazine has built a forecasting model that uses historical data
from all major public opinion polls along with fundamental information such as
economic conditions and demographic changes to predict the Senate races. The
chart above shows the model’s current prediction–a 71% probability that the
Senate will be controlled by the Democrats. That means Biden’s economic plan has
a good chance of being enacted–tax hikes and all. The table, below, compiled by
Bloomberg Businessweek, summarizes the major components of Biden’s tax plan.
(You can find the details of the Biden economic plan at their campaign website.)

Investors–stand by for a ram. The Biden plan raises tax rates across the board,
partly to pay for his proposed spending increases on healthcare, education, and
environmental programs and partly to take a swat at “the 1% problem” so much has
been written about. All of the proposed tax changes have significant economic
effects but today I will focus on the elephant in the bathtub–taxes on
investment income.

The corporate tax rate gets the most media attention but is small potatoes,
partly because so many companies find tricky ways not to pay it. Biden plans to
raise the corporate income tax rate by one-third, from 21% to 28%. More
importantly, he has proposed changing the way taxable income is calculated by
limiting companies’ ability to reduce taxable income below the numbers they show
to investors. On net, this will be a drag on cash flow for C-Corps, i.e., the
stock market, by undercutting their ability to pay dividends, to make
investments, and to buy back their own stock.

The top personal tax rate on ordinary income is the single most important tax
rate for the capital markets because it is applied to the income that flows
through S-Corps, LLCs, sole proprietorships and other pass-through vehicles. The
Biden plan raises the top marginal tax rate from from 37% to 39.6%. But it also
removes the cap on income subject to the social security tax, which would add
another 6.2%, making the effective top rate 45.8% for high earners, reducing
after-tax income by 14% on the margin.

As an aside, don’t forget to add state income taxes. If you live in California,
the top marginal tax rate is currently 13.3%, which would make the overall total
top marginal rate 59.1%. I say currently because there is a bill in the
legislature that would bump the California number to 16.8%, or 62.6% overall.
The Biden plan, however, would allow taxpayers to deduct state taxes from
taxable income again, much to the relief of Californians, New Yorkers, and
others in high tax states.

But wait, there’s more, as they say on late night infomercials. The Biden Plan
also doubles the tax rate on long-term capital gains from 20% to the 39.6% tax
rate on ordinary income, raises effective tax rates on pass-through entities,
and taxes carried interest at ordinary income rates. Oh, and it dramatically
lowers the exemption threshold for the estate tax, and would likely increase the
rate, but the details are not yet clear.

Analyzing the impact of these tax rate changes on asset prices is an interesting
but complicated assignment. Since all of the tax rates on investment income seem
to be going up, it is pretty clear that the average after-tax return on total
assets will fall, which is not good for the overall market or investor net
worth. Each change in a tax rate, however, will lower the after-tax return on
some collection of assets in an investor’s portfolio relative to other assets.
That will lead investors to rebalance their portfolios to reflect the new
relative yields, driving their prices apart and their returns together.

Companies and sectors will be impacted differently based on the source of their
profits, the channels they use–dividends, share buybacks, or reinvested capital
to grow future profits–to distribute those profits to shareholders, and the tax
position of their shareholders. I will post a detailed analysis of the impact of
the Biden tax plan on the prices of all 10 stock market sectors in the next
week.

JR

Posted in All | Comments Off on Investment Strategy Part 2: Election Outlook and
Implications
← Older posts


 * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
   
   FIND JOHN ON
   SUBSTACK
   @DRJOHNRUTLEDGE
   
   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 * RECENT POSTS
   
   * I Can (a little more) See Clearly Now
   * Investment Strategy Part 2: Election Outlook and Implications
   * Investment Strategy Part 1: Driving Through Fog
   * 20200814 CNBC Power Lunch
   * Credit Crisis–Postponed, Not Prevented

 * 


 * BEA INDICATORS
   
   * U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, August 2024 October 8, 2024
   * Personal Consumption Expenditures by State, 2023 October 3, 2024
   * Gross Domestic Product by State and Personal Income by State, 2nd Quarter
     2024 September 27, 2024
   * Personal Income and Outlays, August 2024 September 27, 2024
   * Gross Domestic Product (Third Estimate), Corporate Profits (Revised
     Estimate), and GDP by Industry, Second Quarter 2024 and Annual Update
     September 26, 2024
   * U.S. International Investment Position, 2nd Quarter 2024 September 25, 2024


 * ARCHIVES
   
   Archives Select Month March 2021 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 April
   2020 March 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August
   2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019
   December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 November 2014 October
   2014 September 2014 January 2014 April 2012 March 2012 June 2011 March 2010
   February 2010 November 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February
   2009 January 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March
   2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 September 2007 April 2007 March
   2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006
   August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006
   January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August
   2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January
   2005 December 2004 November 2004


 * BY JOHN RUTLEDGE
   
   
   
   
   
   LESSONS FROM A ROAD WARRIOR:
   
   
   How I fell off a horse, earned 15 million air miles, got sand in my shoes and
   learned how to invest
   
   Available on Amazon


 * RECENT POSTS
   
   * I Can (a little more) See Clearly Now
   * Investment Strategy Part 2: Election Outlook and Implications
   * Investment Strategy Part 1: Driving Through Fog
   * 20200814 CNBC Power Lunch
   * Credit Crisis–Postponed, Not Prevented
 * Search for:


 * BEA INDICATORS
   
   * U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, August 2024
   * Personal Consumption Expenditures by State, 2023
   * Gross Domestic Product by State and Personal Income by State, 2nd Quarter
     2024
   * Personal Income and Outlays, August 2024
   * Gross Domestic Product (Third Estimate), Corporate Profits (Revised
     Estimate), and GDP by Industry, Second Quarter 2024 and Annual Update

Dr. John Rutledge: Far from Equilibrium Economics, Finance and Investing
Proudly powered by WordPress.