reason.com Open in urlscan Pro
75.2.24.81  Public Scan

Form analysis
3 forms found in the DOM

GET https://reason.com/

<form role="search" method="get" class="search-form" action="https://reason.com/">
  <label>
    <span class="screen-reader-text">Search for:</span>
    <input type="search" class="search-field" placeholder="Search …" value="" name="s">
  </label>
  <input type="submit" class="search-submit" value="Search">
</form>

POST

<form method="post" id="gform_0" class="recaptcha-v3-initialized"><input type="hidden" name="login_redirect" value="/2024/01/29/the-last-liberal/">
  <div class="gform_heading">
    <h3 class="gform_title">Login Form</h3>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_body">
    <div id="gform_fields_login" class="gform_fields top_label">
      <div id="field_0_1" class="gfield gfield--type-text gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_1"><label class="gfield_label gform-field-label"
          for="input_1">Username<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_text"><input name="input_1" id="input_1" type="text" value="" class="" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false"> </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_0_2" class="gfield gfield--type-text gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_2"><label class="gfield_label gform-field-label"
          for="input_2">Password<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_text"><input name="input_2" id="input_2" type="password" value="" class="" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false"> </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_0_3" class="gfield gfield--type-remember_me field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below hidden_label gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_3"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label screen-reader-text gfield_label_before_complex"></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_checkbox">
          <div class="gfield_checkbox" id="input_3">
            <div class="gchoice gchoice_3">
              <input class="gfield-choice-input" name="input_3.1" type="checkbox" value="1" id="choice_3">
              <label for="choice_3" id="label_3">Remember Me</label>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_footer top_label"> <button type="submit" id="gform_submit_button_0" class="gform_button button"
      onclick="if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]){return false;}  if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]=true;}  "
      onkeypress="if( event.keyCode == 13 ){ if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]){return false;} if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]=true;}  jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;).trigger(&quot;submit&quot;,[true]); }">Login</button>
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="is_submit_0" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_submit" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_unique_id" value="">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="state_0" value="WyJbXSIsIjVmZDk0MDRiMTc0NTYwODJmYTIwNGZlZDYxN2ViYzJjIl0=">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_target_page_number_0" id="gform_target_page_number_0" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_source_page_number_0" id="gform_source_page_number_0" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_field_values" value="">
  </div>
</form>

POST /2024/01/29/the-last-liberal/#gf_17

<form method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" target="gform_ajax_frame_17" id="gform_17" class="puprf-signup-widget recaptcha-v3-initialized" action="/2024/01/29/the-last-liberal/#gf_17" data-formid="17" novalidate="">
  <div class="gf_invisible ginput_recaptchav3" data-sitekey="6LeMnkUaAAAAALL8T1-XAyB7vxpOeTExu6KwR48-" data-tabindex="0"><input id="input_9ae663dc72ef42b46f2cf3a53ec042e1" class="gfield_recaptcha_response" type="hidden"
      name="input_9ae663dc72ef42b46f2cf3a53ec042e1" value=""></div>
  <div class="gform-body gform_body">
    <div id="gform_fields_17" class="gform_fields top_label form_sublabel_below description_below">
      <div id="field_17_1" class="gfield gfield--type-email gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below hidden_label gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_17_1"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label" for="input_17_1">Email<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_email">
          <input name="input_1" id="input_17_1" type="email" value="" class="large" placeholder="Email Address" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false">
        </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_17_2" class="gfield gfield--type-honeypot gform_validation_container field_sublabel_below gfield--has-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_17_2"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label" for="input_17_2">Phone</label>
        <div class="ginput_container"><input name="input_2" id="input_17_2" type="text" value="" autocomplete="new-password"></div>
        <div class="gfield_description" id="gfield_description_17_2">This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.</div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_footer top_label"> <button type="submit" id="gform_submit_button_17" class="gform_button button"
      onclick="if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]){return false;}  if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]=true;}  "
      onkeypress="if( event.keyCode == 13 ){ if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]){return false;} if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]=true;}  jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;).trigger(&quot;submit&quot;,[true]); }">Submit</button>
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_ajax" value="form_id=17&amp;title=&amp;description=1&amp;tabindex=0&amp;theme=data-form-theme='gravity-theme'">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="is_submit_17" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_submit" value="17">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_unique_id" value="">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="state_17" value="WyJbXSIsIjVmZDk0MDRiMTc0NTYwODJmYTIwNGZlZDYxN2ViYzJjIl0=">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_target_page_number_17" id="gform_target_page_number_17" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_source_page_number_17" id="gform_source_page_number_17" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_field_values" value="">
  </div>
  <p style="display: none !important;" class="akismet-fields-container" data-prefix="ak_"><label>Δ<textarea name="ak_hp_textarea" cols="45" rows="8" maxlength="100"></textarea></label><input type="hidden" id="ak_js_1" name="ak_js"
      value="1707784232321">
    <script>
      document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value", (new Date()).getTime());
    </script>
  </p>
</form>

Text Content

 * Latest
 * Magazine
   * Current Issue
   * Archives
   * Subscribe
   * Crossword
 * Video
 * Podcasts
   * All Shows
   * The Reason Roundtable
   * The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
   * The Soho Forum Debates
   * Just Asking Questions
   * The Best of Reason Magazine
   * Why We Can't Have Nice Things
 * Volokh
 * Newsletters
 * Donate
   * Donate Online
   * Donate Crypto
   * Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
   * Torchbearer Society
   * Planned Giving
 * Subscribe
   * Print/Digital Subscriptions
   * Gift Subscriptions

Search for:


LOGIN FORM

Username(Required)

Password(Required)

Remember Me
Login
Create new account
Forgot password


Media Criticism


THE LAST LIBERAL


BILL MAHER ON WEED, WOKENESS, AND 30 YEARS OF FREE SPEECH

Matt Welch | From the March 2024 issue

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly
versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
(Photo by Kevin Kwan)

In December, the public research firm WPA Intelligence came out with a small
survey with potentially huge—and widely ignored—implications for institutional
media, entertainment, and government.

Asking 1,000 registered voters which of eight listed media personalities they
trusted, the firm found podcast iconoclast Joe Rogan—who has been serially
singled out by the Joe Biden White House for COVID-19 "misinformation"—in second
place with 36 percent, just edging out former Fox News host Tucker Carlson's 35
percent and Daily Wire impresario Ben Shapiro's 33, and far ahead of the
industry-respected CNN anchor Jake Tapper (23 percent).

In first place, with 40 percent, including the highest ratings of the group
among political independents? Comedian Bill Maher.

Maher, whose 22nd season of HBO's Real Time debuted January 19, the day before
his 68th birthday, finds himself in an unusually important position in American
discourse as he enters a 30th consecutive year hosting a political talk show on
TV. As elite journalists increasingly shy away from "platforming" allegedly
dangerous conservatives, Maher eagerly slings the bull with the Steve Bannons
and Vivek Ramaswamys of the world. As late-night comedians elicit "clapter" for
their dutiful swipes at Donald Trump, the HBO host still aims for actual laughs,
in part by making his own political side uncomfortable. And in an era when both
left and right are abandoning bedrock Enlightenment values of due process and
free speech, Maher has become one of the most insistent (critics would say
hectoring) voices for old-school liberalism.

Powered By

00:00/02:44
10 Sec


Ukraine Says Russian Forces Use Starlink Terminals




Next
Stay





"It's a small band of us," Maher says at the Beverly Hills Hotel's famed Polo
Lounge, "but we're the ones who haven't gone insane, and people know it."

Maher is stubborn, tolerant, energetic, and a tad eccentric. He brought a
dropper of organic water flavoring to lunch, explaining: "Am I a chemist? Have I
vetted it? No, but I really believe them. And Aaron Rodgers texted me and said
he's doing it." Over the decades he has been one the most influential public
figures to normalize the recreational use of marijuana, sitting on the advisory
board of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML).
Twice during the 2023 Writers Guild strike he came close to breaking ranks and
bringing his show back sans writers, as he had in 2008.

As a potentially insane 2024 election year wheezes into gear, Maher is calling
for Biden to step down, gearing up for a comedy tour titled "WTF?" releasing a
book collecting his editorials over the past two decades, and continuing his
popular new video podcast Club Random, where he gets high with celebrities and
tries not to talk about politics.

Reason's Matt Welch sat down with Maher on January 5 to talk about his career,
the state of free speech, and wrestling with such characters as Kanye West.

Reason: How often are you stoned on Club Random?

Maher: Oh, constantly. The whole point of the show is I'm completely stoned. And
I'm not hiding it.

Who's the best stoned interviewee? Who has just lost it so far?

Probably Kanye, but we never aired that one.

You're suppressing sweet Kanye material!

Oh, I would've been canceled. I mean, I try to resist bending the knee—I think I
do it better than almost anybody else in media—to the woke shit, but sometimes,
you know, you will just be canceled.



We did that right around when he was first starting ranting about the Jews. I
wanted to have him over to instruct him, in a nice way. Everybody else was
yelling at him, and that's not the way to get through to somebody. And he's a
sweet guy—I mean, he's not a terrible guy. He is a narcissist in the sense of
the last thing he would ever think to say to me was, "What's going on with you?"

But I did, I think, get through to him about antisemitism. I don't know if it
stuck. Apparently it didn't, because he said things since like "I like Hitler,"
so.

He was on time, very normal. I think he had been thrown off social media, so he
had no outlet and he wanted to go to a few places and get his story out. And he
was cool; we laughed our asses off for a couple hours and smoked a lot. And I
tried to explain to him about people who are successful in business—you know,
that's capitalism. They're going to be rough in business. It's just capitalism,
and Jews are good at it, so maybe that's why you're beefing so much about it.

But it was still risqué enough that you didn't want to—

No, it wasn't just that I didn't want to get canceled. It was that I thought
giving him, with the level of his antisemitism, more oxygen—no, I didn't want to
participate in that. I was hoping I could get him to recant, basically, and I
could not. I got him to listen, and then we'd go onto something else and laugh
and laugh and laugh, and then it would just sort of like come back again, and he
would say something. I'd be like, "Now Kanye, OK, there's that Jew thing again!"
So I thought I had a noble purpose, but then when it did not come around to what
I hoped: No, I'm not going to help him. That's just a bridge too far.



I want to talk a bit about the program that you do on television and look on its
history, because you're in year 30 of doing political comedy.

Thirty consecutive years on TV: That's a lot! It's amazing that it gets no
coverage in the mainstream media. Really, that's not a story? I know I'm a bad
person because I don't bend a knee to the woke doctrine, but wow, that's a lot
to look past.

I don't know, in your age and decrepitude, whether you remember where your
memory was 30 years ago—

It's not the age, it's the pot!

But when you were starting [Maher's previous TV show] Politically Incorrect, and
to the extent that you had a mission of what you were doing besides getting
laughs and getting ratings and getting renewals, what was that mission? And how
has that changed over the years?

Well, it's in the title, Politically Incorrect. That was not a phrase at the
time. But that was really what it is. Political correctness, even in the early
'90s, was starting to be out of control.

And also funny to make fun of.

Exactly. I mean, it was a nice barn to throw stuff at; you couldn't miss if you
were honest about it. It was a zeitgeist, a feeling in the culture that the
political correctness was going too far. And I thought maybe I could put a stake
in its heart. And of course, just like the Kanye thing, completely failed,
because it only metastasized and got worse. Incredibly worse.

I remember when I started editing Reason in 2008, the phrase and the concept of
political correctness felt like a '90s thing. Your show came out. Comedy Central
was very much in the thick of it; the South Park guys came out right around
then. And even some of the early online media felt a little post-partisan, like
Salon.com had David Horowitz and Camille Paglia writing as columnists.



The Huffington Post!

Right? When Arianna was still almost a right-winger.

Yes. And I was very, I wouldn't say involved on an official level, but she was a
very, very—and still is a very, very—close friend. And I think it was Andrew
Breitbart, he's a byword now for ultra-conservative, he was one of her friends
and was on the project. So, come on, man. I mean, when they say, you know,
"You've changed." I've changed? Come on. Things change.

So I was talking early in my editorhood to Greg Lukianoff from [the free speech
and civil liberties advocacy organization] FIRE, who you had on recently. Back
then FIRE was still just doing campus stuff and hadn't expanded.

Yeah, there's a little cadre of you guys—you and him and Bari [Weiss] and Andrew
Sullivan, who are just so great that you exist in this culture, because it's a
small band of us, but we're the ones who haven't gone insane, and people know
it.

In talking with Greg in those days, they'd been tracking this stuff on campus,
and I was like, "OK you guys are fighting in education, but didn't we win the
politically correct wars in the '90s?" And he's like, "You are so wrong about
that." It's just that we stopped talking about it as a country, but meanwhile
all the institutions got totally infected.

They really did. And that's how you wound up with college campuses being Team
Hamas. "Hey liberals! Let's get behind the most illiberal people in the world!
Let's get with the people who put a bag over women's heads and make them have a
male guardian if they want to leave the house." I could never have predicted it.
So insane.

Since you have more proximity to and grounding in the left of the center of the
median, do you have a working theory of what the hell happened?



That's a great question. I mean, I know there are people who think that it's a
deliberate communist infiltration; that I find hard to believe. But I do think
it starts with stuff in the universities. As I called it in an editorial
recently, that's the mouth of the river from which all the nonsense comes. Which
is how we saw what we saw post–October 7 on the campuses, and the Harvard
president resigning, and so forth.

I was recently remembering the Ari Fleischer quote, where he was asked about
your comment not long after September 11 about the comparative cowardliness of
Americans sending bombs from afar. His response when asked, "What do you say to
Bill Maher's quote," was, "Americans have to watch what they say." Which was not
great! It was not great for the spokesman of the president of the United States
to say that as a general thing, or even as a specific thing.

Everybody on the left was on my side. As they should be. And that should pertain
to both sides, left and right. It was wrong when someone from the right said,
"Americans should watch what they say," but who are we really watching what we
say for now, more than anybody? The left. That's who you have to watch what you
say around.

Look, it's not like cancel culture doesn't exist on the right. I've pointed out
before: Nobody got canceled harder than Colin Kaepernick. OK? So it happens both
ways. But it's more of a left thing. People are much more afraid. Obviously
people in the public eye even more so, but even just around the office, people
are worried: "I have a thought; just safer not to say it." And that's a bad
place to be.

I referenced the Ari Fleischer quote on CNN recently, in an amazing segment from
a few months ago in reaction to one of these court cases that went against the
Biden administration for trying to suppress speech, especially COVID-related
health speech and "misinformation." I sat with a panel of journalists who were
all just shaking their damn heads at the judge not allowing the Biden
administration to crack down on all these lying misinformation people. As I was
saying on CNN, I couldn't believe that we got to this point where journalists
are cheering on the White House engaging in actual censorship, saying from the
same podium that Spotify really needs to do more to crack down on Joe Rogan,
that there's a dirty dozen list of people who spread the most misinformation
about COVID.



Misinformation. One of the other most weasel fucking
words. Whose misinformation? These people—the "science" people—have no idea what
science is, that it's something that's tested every day. Otherwise it's
religion. What they're talking about, what they have is a religion. Ridiculous.

I think of the survey that they did about COVID in 2021, where something like
almost 50 percent of Democrats thought that if you got COVID, there was a 50
percent chance you would get hospitalized, when it was actually more like 1
percent. Obviously, that tells you something about a media bubble on the left
also. I mean, that's some crazy misinformation. So maybe a quarter of the
country, half of the liberal side of the country, is going around with the idea
that half the people who get COVID go to the hospital. Of course they're going
to believe in crazy stupid overreaction tactics to deal with this. So nobody has
a monopoly on misinformation.

How often do you get accused of "platforming"? When Politically
Incorrect started, one of the things that was refreshing about it was that it
was a place where people with different points of view about politics could
laugh and talk about it as if they were real human beings. I just presumed that
everyone would be copying that model, but it seems to have run in the opposite
direction now, where just the idea of even a straight-news television program
having people who have different political views seems odd.

I had [Ron] DeSantis and Ted Cruz on this year, and Bill Barr. And yes, to
answer your question, I can think of two people—and I won't say who they are;
one of them is pretty famous—just yelling at me in an email about that. And my
answer to that is: Fuck off. You know what? You live in your ivory
tower. I'm going to talk to everybody in the half of the country that you find
is so deplorable. They're not going to self-deport, even if they are deplorable.



And some of them are! And some on the left are deplorable too, and incredibly
obnoxious. That's the country!

When historians look back in a hundred years, if we're still here, I don't think
they're going to divide the country like we do into these two camps. They're
going to say: As a people, they were obnoxious. It happens in different forms on
both sides. As a people, they didn't believe in science. On the right, they
think global warming is a hoax or whatever nonsense they believe about that. And
on the left, they think men can have babies. That's what they'll say. They'll
say, "As a people, they just lost their shit."

Do you have a special sense of either foreboding or humor, even if it's a little
bit mordant, about 2024?

I think I'm where a lot of people are: I wish Biden would step aside. Well,
first, I wish Trump doesn't win, but he totally could, and it's looking more
like he will. But a lot can change in a year. We haven't had any of his
trials—although if the January 6 commission and the media and everything else
haven't changed people's minds about liking him, I think these trials are only
going to make him look like a revolutionary leader. All you have to say is, "The
people who put me on trial were corrupt!" And then your ignominious behavior
becomes a badge of honor. So whether the trials are going to help or hurt him,
it's hard to say. I think it'll be about a draw, and then it'll really be a
referendum on which side is crazier.

And both sides have a case, although I always fall on the side of "Trump of
course is truly crazy." He's stupid and crazy. They're two completely different
things, but he has both of them. I'm even more worried about the crazy side, but
crazy photographs, insanity photographs, it's compelling. And when he shows up,
come on, people are going to cover it, watch it. It's not going to be boring.
And in this unfactual society, I don't think any of the issues really are what
most people vote on anyway. It doesn't really matter what any of them say or do,
because they each have their own media sources, who are in the business of
feeding back to their audience what they want to hear.



Trump has been so weird for comedy. He's inherently funny—as a comedian, he's
got really good laugh-out-loud timing. But also as a character, he's funny. And
yet for institutional comedy, for Saturday Night Live comedy, I think he's been
terrible. Why? How did they screw up such an obvious thing?

I must say first, the guy on Saturday Night Live who does him now [James Austin
Johnson] is genius at it. So much better than any of the other people who did
him. Alec Baldwin's not an impressionist; he did a passable job, but it was just
a vehicle to put stupid words in Trump's mouth, which, who can't do that? I
mean, I don't disagree with the spirit of it; it just gets old. But this guy
captures what I was saying a minute ago, the insanity. He captures that he is
insane, because he talks exactly the way Trump sounds: stream of consciousness,
one thought ping-ponging to another one that may or may not be connected. That's
what kills me. That's the best thing they do on that show.

That's good. But generally speaking, and not just to single out SNL, late-night
comedy overall has, at least for my taste, and maybe you have a different
opinion—

Oh, no. I don't really want to talk about it, because I get in trouble if I
start talking about other people doing political comedy on TV. Let's just say:
There's a place for everybody, and everybody's super talented, and they're just
doing different things!

But one way that I find there to be this weird separation, is that there's a
demonstrated audience for what you do. There's an audience for Bari Weiss,
Andrew Sullivan, us, people who are doing similar things. And they give us
feedback that is similar to the feedback you get as well. And then if you look
in the world of comedy, the places where comedy is institutional, they seem to
be losing audiences. But the individuals who are out there on Netflix, and
who've gone solo? The people who don't give a fuck are out there killing it. Why
such a split? Why is it so that the institutions can't recognize and learn from
the people who are killing it?



It's my mouth-of-the-river theory. The mouth of the river is the elite colleges.
Those spoiled kids who go to those elite colleges who do nothing but complain
about privilege while they lead the most privileged life possible. They have the
ultimate privilege, which is the ability to spout nonsense without any sort of
consequence and to believe in impractical things. So that's who goes to those
colleges. It's a very small world in that world. The same kind of kids who go to
the same kind of schools, same kind of neighborhoods they grew up in, go to
these colleges. So they're in this sort of bubble where they're feeding this
stuff to each other.

Who knows where the actual origin is. It's kind of like AIDS: Was it a monkey? I
don't know. Something like that. Maybe this was a monkey; I don't know. But then
they go into media, so now they have the bullhorn, right? So it's not a big
number of people, but it's the people who are controlling it.

When I first received your show thousands of years ago, I took it as this new
thing, and I'm sure you felt it as a new thing, a new kind of genre. But now I
wonder: Was it also maybe the last of an old thing? You ever look at those old
Merv Griffin clips, or—

David Susskind?

Exactly. Or Dick Cavett: Let's just get John Lennon on to talk about crazy shit
with someone over here.

Yeah, that's what I was doing with Politically Incorrect. I was bringing back
something. I never claimed I invented the idea of having different people on
this show at the same time—talk shows had moved away from that. So it was in a
way a renaissance of something from the antiquity of television.



I of course took it to a different level. It was sort of a designed train wreck,
that show, right? You were supposed to have Bob Dole on with Carrot Top because
the idea was they both get to vote, so they both really have the same power, or
whatever. And so that was the charm.

It was also a silly show in many ways, because that often rendered just
silliness. But it was a comedy show. First of all, it was a half-hour long minus
eight minutes of commercials. We had 22 minutes for four people plus me to talk,
minus a monologue. I mean, you couldn't really get too deep into a lot of
issues.

So Real Time comes on. More space, more serious-ish. More explicitly political.

The difference was there wasn't Carrot Top. And I say that as someone who loves
Carrot Top: He's a super smart guy but not right for sitting on a panel. It's
people like you now. In the old show, we were always trying to have and needed
celebrity value. There are some celebrities now, but there are very few, and
they are almost never on the panel. This is a team of thinkers.

So 2025, what are you going to do? Do you want to keep doing this?

I'll probably do it until they kick me out. I can't think of a better job.

This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and
trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

Email(Required)

Phone

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Submit

Δ

NEXT: Brickbats: February 2024

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Media CriticismFree SpeechPolitical CorrectnessLiberalismComedyTelevision
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly
versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (118)


LATEST

SCOTUS IS TROUBLED BY THE CLAIM THAT STATES CAN DISQUALIFY TRUMP FROM THE
ELECTION AS AN INSURRECTIONIST

Jacob Sullum | 2.12.2024 1:35 PM

PROTECT ACT COULD REQUIRE REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING PORN ONLINE

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 2.12.2024 12:00 PM

BIDEN'S BIZARRE 'SHRINKFLATION' NONSENSE

Eric Boehm | 2.12.2024 11:15 AM

DELINQUENT COUNTRIES

Liz Wolfe | 2.12.2024 9:30 AM

JOE BIDEN'S NO GOOD, VERY BAD DAY

J.D. Tuccille | 2.12.2024 7:00 AM





 * About
 * Browse Topics
 * Events
 * Staff
 * Jobs
 * Donate
 * Advertise
 * Subscribe
 * Contact
 * Media
 * Shop
 * Amazon

Reason FacebookReason TwitterReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeReason
ItunesReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of
Service apply.



Notifications