citydao.nodeblocks.io Open in urlscan Pro
2a06:98c1:3121::3  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

 * Dashboard
 * Proposals
 * Treasury

Connect Wallet
Connect your wallet to unlock personalized metrics for your account
Connect Wallet to Unlock
total proposals
59
avg participation
8%
total token supply
10,051
unique token holders
4,932
total proposals
59
avg participation
8%
total token supply
10,051
unique token holders
4,932


CITYDAO STATS

total proposals

59
avg participation

7.60%
total token supply

10,051
unique token holders

4,932
met quorum

Met Quorum69%
met support

Met Support52%


TOKENS

3


CITYDAO CITIZEN

total supply10,000
holders4,893
unique holders48.93%


CITYDAO FOUNDING CITIZEN

total supply50
holders37
unique holders74.00%


CITYDAO FIRST CITIZEN

total supply1
holders1
unique holders100.00%


PROPOSALS

59
View all


CIP 182 - T0WN STAGE ONE FUNDING ALLOCATION



TLDR: This proposal enables the t0wn team to reallocate the resources from Stage
1 of the t0wn project toward building two apps that will more immediately and
concretely benefit the t0wn project and CityDAO as a whole. The overall plan for
t0wn has not changed.

This proposal asks for only $1 of additional funding to secure a quorum of 250
votes. Other than that, we are merely asking for the ability to reallocate funds
that have already been sent to our treasury. We have removed our request for
additional funding based on the responses in the forum, which we take very
seriously. To us, t0wn is a community made of its valued members, and compromise
is the language of cooperation.

OVERVIEW

The t0wn team has been meeting weekly for months. We’ve had several meetings
with the Próspera team about possibly acquiring real estate in it’s first tower
as a first physical hub for t0wn. Those discussions remain ongoing. We’ve had
all sorts of contact, discussion and meetings with potential member DAOs. Our
aim is to reallocate the remaining funds toward building apps that will help
push this project forward.

As of today, a little over $54,000 remains in the t0wn treasury. Our initial CIP
called for $32K in t0wn team compensation and $20K in discretionary funds. $1K
compensation has been paid out per team member ($4k total) and no other money
has been spent. Based on our internal weekly discussions, meetings with other
DAOs and projects, Twitter spaces and independent research, we are clearer on
how we think the discretionary funds should be spent.

FUNDING

We would like the ability to reallocate the remaining funds toward:

 1. A dominant assurance smart contract
 2. A identity verification app that KYCs individuals to global banking
    standards and ties the verified individual to one and only one ETH address
    with a soulbound token. This app will consist of two components:
    1. KYC functionality - for example, a custom front end that utilizes the API
       of a third party KYC service like Plaid.
    2. A NFT smart contract, likely employing the ERC-5484 standard for
       soulbound tokens.
 3. Legal costs relating to analyzing the appropriate DAO structure

PROJECT DETAILS

Assurance contract: Our initial t0wn STAGE 1 plan was to have DAOs sign LOIs
stating their intent to contribute to a t0wn treasury to buy land for a “DAO
hub.” We decided it would not only benefit t0wn, but also CityDAO and the web3
community at large if we figured out how to program the essence of an LOI into a
smart contract. Utilizing Alex Tabarrok’s Dominant Assurance Contract idea, we
will create a smart contract where entities can pledge money toward a public
good (like t0wn). If the funding threshold is hit by a certain deadline (which
is programmed into the smart contract when it is deployed), the project gets
funded. If the threshold is not hit by the deadline, everyone gets their money
back and those that contributed the earliest get a small monetary “prize” for
having been the first movers / believers. Details around the prize mechanics
will be sorted out during development, one key component being the prize is big
enough to incentivize early contribution but small enough to disincentivize
entities wanting the project to fail.

Building a dominant assurance smart contract will not only be a boon to t0wn and
CityDAO, but also to anyone who wants to fund a public good on the blockchain
without using methods such as Juicebox that take a significant percentage of
funds.

Identity Verification: Part of having a community is ensuring that people are
not sybils, that identities can be verified. Rather than using a method such as
NFT + Gitcoin Passport or Proof of Humanity, we would like to offer individuals
the ability to KYC to global banking standards, verify ownership of a wallet
address, and then marry the two with a soulbound token. We plan to use the
ERC-5484 standard for soulbound tokens which allows both the issuer and the
holder to burn the token - the former being necessary in case of identity fraud
and the latter being necessary in case the holder wants to disconnect or move
their identity to a different address.

RELATIONSHIP TO THE ORIGINAL t0wn CIP (IPFS #QmWXdW6)

This proposal augments STAGE ONE of the original proposal by allowing additional
uses of the funding allocated by that proposal. It also adds an additional
potential STAGE TWO trigger—a deployed assurance contract that successfully
raises at least $750k will automatically trigger STAGE TWO. The t0wn team will
determine which avenue to pursue (ie signed LOIs or raising via assurance
contract) following development of the latter.

BENEFITS TO CITYDAO CITIZENS

 * All the benefits outlined in the original t0wn proposal remain.
 * CityDAO Citizens will be able to use the app at cost for a period of one year
   after the app is launched, subject to reasonable volume of usage and our
   team’s ability to handle such volume. We will make best efforts to allow
   CityDAO Citizens to use the app at cost for longer than one year, again
   subject to reasonable volume of usage and our team’s ability to handle such
   volume.
 * Open use of the dominant assurance smart contract and the ERC-5484 soulbound
   token contract.

OWNERSHIP OF WORK PRODUCT

 * The dominant assurance smart contract and the ERC-5484 soulbound token
   contract will be open source.
 * The rest of the KYC app will be owned by the Friends of Town Foundation
   corporation.




For
172 votes97 %

Against
3 votes1 %

Abstain
1 votes0 %

2 months ago


CIP-179: RETAINING PAT SANTIAGO FOR ENHANCED AUTONOMY AND OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE



NOTE: I am posting this CIP on behalf of Pat Santiago.

Summary This proposal aims to retain Pat Santiago as an advisor for three months
to work on a project that will enhance the autonomy of CityDAO.

Background CityDAO has been actively working on expanding its reach and
enhancing its operations. Pat Santiago is an experienced professional with a
strong track record in the development and management of automated workflows.
His expertise and insights can help CityDAO achieve a higher level of
operational autonomy and efficiency.

Proposal Pat Santiago will be retained for three months to work on the following
key areas:

 1. Analyzing the current governance structure and providing recommendations on
    how to improve and optimize it to make CityDAO more autonomous.

 2. Identifying essential operational bottlenecks and proposing solutions to
    streamline the decision-making process.

 3. Developing a roadmap for integrating automated tools and systems that will
    reduce manual intervention in CityDAO’s daily operations.

 4. Conducting a thorough assessment of CityDAO’s technical infrastructure and
    providing recommendations for enhancements that will ensure robustness and
    autonomy.

 5. Collaborating with the community to design and implement innovative
    solutions for decentralizing power and enabling more effective collaboration
    among the DAO’s members.

Financials Pat Santiago will be paid a fee of $2499/month for their service, for
a total engagement cost of $7497 over three months. The payment will be made in
Ethereum at the prevailing exchange rate at the time of payment, and in one lump
sum payment on the day that this CIP passes.

Outcomes At the end of the three-month engagement, Pat Santiago will provide a
comprehensive report detailing his findings, recommendations, and results
achieved during this period. This report will serve as a guide for CityDAO to
continue working on achieving enhanced autonomy and operational efficiency.

With this proposed CIP, CityDAO will benefit from Pat Santiago’s expertise in
making the DAO more autonomous and operationally efficient. The investment of
$2499/month for three months aligns with CityDAO’s goals and can help pave the
way for sustained growth and success.

To ensure that Pat Santiago’s work effectively contributes to CityDAO’s progress
toward autonomy and to address the community’s concerns, it is crucial to
establish a set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to evaluate the work’s
tangible outcomes and deliverables. The following KPIs are recommended:

 * Roadmap Completion Rate: Percentage of milestones outlined in the autonomy
   roadmap achieved within the specified timeline.

 * Risk Mitigation Success: Number of identified risks successfully mitigated or
   resolved during the consultancy period.

 * KPI Achievement Rate: Percentage of established KPIs reached or surpassed by
   the end of the consultancy period.

 * Community Engagement Index: Number of workshops and training sessions
   conducted for the CityDAO community members, with a focus on knowledge
   transfer and capacity building.

 * Collaboration Expansion: Number of partnerships and collaborations
   established with other parties and stakeholders during the consultancy
   period, working toward CityDAO’s autonomy.

 * To effectively track the progress of CityDAO’s autonomy and monitor the
   achievement of these KPIs, a progress tracking system can be implemented as
   follows:

 * Establish Baseline Metrics: Determine the initial values for each KPI at the
   beginning of the consultancy period.

 * Set Target Metrics: Define the desired outcomes for each KPI for the duration
   of the consultancy period.

 * Periodic Evaluation: Conduct regular evaluations (e.g., bi-weekly or monthly)
   to assess the progress of each KPI, comparing the current values with the
   baseline and target metrics.

 * Progress Reports: Pat Santiago will submit progress reports to the CityDAO
   community at predetermined intervals (e.g., monthly), detailing the results
   of the evaluations and providing updates on the progress made towards
   autonomy.

 * Continuous Improvement: Based on the progress reports and evaluations,
   identify areas that require improvement or adjustments, and implement the
   necessary changes to ensure the successful achievement of the KPIs and
   CityDAO’s autonomy objectives.

By establishing these KPIs and implementing a progress tracking system, CityDAO
can effectively monitor and evaluate Pat Santiago’s work, guaranteeing that the
consultancy period yields tangible outcomes and brings the organization closer
to achieving its autonomy goals.

As a demonstration of his skills Pat created an autonomous GPT agent to write
this CIP and respond to any comments on it.




For
100 votes65 %

Against
42 votes27 %

Abstain
10 votes6 %

2 months ago


CIP-151: QUORUM AND ELECTIONS



TLDR

This proposal has 3 main fuctions:

 1. Adjust Quorums
 2. Hold Elections for City Council
 3. Establish a Complaint Process

Category - Governance Criticalness - High Impact - High (All members of DAO will
be affected) Duration - 6 months Quorum - 500 votes counted as 1 NFT = 1 vote
Budget - 46,800 (+ bonuses up to $18,000)

The three goals are explained in more detail below:

--Adjust quorums--

Currently, the way votes are counted for quorum is 1 NFT = 1 vote. After a year
of governance, CityDAO contributors have realized that it makes no sense for
quorum to be the same for $11K and for $2 million, and it makes no sense that a
non-financial vote has the same quorum as a CIP for $2 million. The new proposed
system would still count 1 NFT as 1 vote for quorum with the following
amendments:

1 vote = 1 quadratically-counted NFT An algorithm will be used to determine the
quorum for different request amounts. An algorithm will be used to determine the
voter approval rating

Quorum Algorithm: 50 + [1/2 * (sqrt $Ask)] Voter Approval Rating Algorithm: 66 +
24 ($ ask / treasury)

 * To amend the Charter will require a quorum of 200 counted quadratically.
   Currently, it takes 1000 votes counted non-quadratically to amend the
   Operating Agreement (OA). This CIP does not intend to alter or amend the OA.
   This includes NOT changing how votes are counted for altering or amending the
   OA. They will be counted non-quadratically as 1 NFT = 1 vote.

--Hold Elections for City Council--

This CIP will create elections for seven (7) members of City Council. Within one
week after elections are completed, the Council will choose one (1) individual
from inside or outside the Council to serve as the Executive Facilitator (EF).
If a member of the Council is chosen as the EF, then the remaining Council
members will choose one additional member.

The EF will be a separate position and is not in the Council. The Council
delegates the authority to the EF. The EF does not vote in the Council. The EF
will be in charge of the day-to-day administration and operational execution,
while the City Council is in policy setting and strategic direction. The Council
may determine the authorities of the EF. The Council may not interfere in the
EF’s authorities except if the EF is incapacitated. The Council are the
decisions makers and the EF handles implementation.

The EF will have the following powers and authority:

 * Implementation of projects, including resource availability and oversight
 * Handle relationships with outside counsel
 * Handle mailing address, copyrights, trademarks, legal formalities
 * Handle relationships with CPAs for bookkeeping and taxes
 * Any powers and authorities delegated by a majority vote of the City Council

The City Council will have the following powers and authority:

 * Appointment of Executive Facilitator.
 * Possible hiring of an Ops Admin
 * Appointment of Multisig Signers.
 * Create advisory boards of citizens.
 * Policy setting and strategic direction.
 * Maintain or hire people to maintain the DAO tools
 * Adopt its own rules of procedure and set the time and place of its official
   meetings.
 * Provide for the prosecution and defense of legal causes on behalf of CityDAO
   and retain counsel and set their compensation.
 * Establish and enforce regulations for behavior.
 * Establish and enforce regulations for the resolution of disputes.
 * Enter into agreements with other DAOs or entities.
 * Levy and collect taxes, rents, lease fees and other sources of revenue.
 * Make investigations of CityDAO affairs; inquire into accounts, records, and
   transactions of any CityDAO department, office, or officer; and, for these
   purposes, require reports from any project and the production of official
   records.
 * Adopt rules and regulations necessary for the exercise of its powers and
   prescribe fines and penalties for the violation of ordinances in accordance
   with city law.
 * Place questions or propositions directly onto Snapshot, when agreed to by 5
   of 7 of the total membership of the City Council.

The City Council will appoint the eight (8) multisig signers. The role of the
multisig signers is transaction execution and transaction evaluation. All
multisig signers will undergo proper training to fully grasp the implications
and responsibilities of being on the multisig. The multisig signers are
responsible to check transactions, to check where the funds are being sent, and
to follow all the requirements for a proper transaction for the protection of
CityDAO. The key aspect of the multisig is that the signers be trusted members
of the DAO.

Operations and Day-to-Day Administration

The City Council will help organize and delegate operational tasks, such as
maintaining the meeting minutes, permissions, passwords, independent contractor
agreements and contracts. The City Council will schedule weekly meetings at
regular times, which will not be changed with less than 48 hours notice. Council
members will each have the highest level of admin permissions on each of
CityDAO’s tools, including but not limited to discord discourse, Twitter,
Notion, Snapshot and Google Workspace. The Council will determine who else
should hold any permissions or passwords.

CIP Template Creation and Management

In addition to formatting a template for CIPs, the City Council will help
problem-solve and request additional information where necessary, to make sure
that proposals further the mission of the DAO.

Transparency Dashboard

The City Council will require that, for quality, transparency and clarity, all
CityDAO projects create a transparent and available document that provides all
pertinent information on funding received, expenditures, milestones and
benchmarks. This document will be written in plain English and will be available
at all times to all citizens on the CityDAO website or Notion page. The Council
will finalize the details of the process. This is not meant to punish people but
to provide transparency. Project members must populate the dashboard in order to
receive continued funding.

Election Method

If this CIP passes, there will be open elections for seven (7) City Council
members, all with six-month terms that begin on the day the election ends. Any
citizen may run for any position. A citizen may be on the City Council and the
multisig simultaneously. There will be no hierarchy of members on the City
Council.

To be elected, candidates must put up a platform statement on Discourse. All
candidates will take part in a series of two (2) public debates with questions
submitted in advance by any citizen, moderated and run by the Community and
Media Guilds together. After the debates, separate ranked choice votes will be
put on Snapshot. All elected members of the multisig and the City Council must
be willing to be KYC’d.

Election Rules

 * The election may not be used as an excuse to disparage the character of
   another member of the DAO.
 * Candidates may not make pledges, promises, or commitments of any sort.

Compensation and Budgets

Multisig Compensation: The multisig signers will receive $100 per month each,
regardless of who actually signs the transactions. This is meant to incentivize
all members to pay close attention to the transactions, their purpose,
destination, suitability and potential liability to the DAO.

City Council Compensation: 3 Citizenship NFT per month per councilmember; City
Council will have a fund of 5 NFTs total per month to bring in talented
individuals to the DAO. 4 of 7 vote required to give an NFT.

Executive Facilitator: The EF will receive $3K per month in compensation + a
potential bonus of up to $3K per month based on performance from the City
Council, and will have a budget of $24K over six (6) months and the authority to
execute agreements.

 * In an emergency event where CityDAO gets sued and is required to pay fees in
   excess of the funds in the City Council treasury, the City Council can put a
   CIP on Discourse and Snapshot concurrently, with no time limits required.
   Quorum will be however many people vote.

Removal

The multisig signers will have one week to sign or reject transactions. If a
transaction is rejected, the signers must document reasons why and next steps
within a reasonable time. If any of the multisig signers refuse to sign (2) or
more transactions, they will be removed and the candidate who had the next
highest vote will replace them. If there are no candidates left, a new election
will be held for replacements or the City Council will choose replacements. The
members of the multisig can vote off any member with a 5 of 8 vote.

If any of the City Council members miss more than three (3) meetings, they will
be removed and replaced in the same manner as the multisig signers. The City
Council can vote off any member with a 5 of 7 vote. The City Council can remove
the EF at any time with a 5 of 7 vote. CityDAO Citizens can call for a removal
or replacement of members of the multisig or the City Council or the Executive
Facilitator with a CIP and a quorum of 50 votes. If a CIP is put up, it will be
done with an anonymous “City Council” account so no one feels pressure to doxx.

--Complaint Process--

A complaint may subject the citizen to penalties up to and including a
prohibition on offending parties from holding administrative positions at
CityDAO or in CityDAO projects.

 * Substance - What Constitutes a Complaint?

An allegation of wrongdoing related to projects, behavior, transactions, or
violations of the rules at CityDAO.

 * Process - How is a Complaint Dealt With?

Step 1 - Mediation by an individual who is agreed-upon by both parties.

Both parties must agree on an individual, preferably (but not necessarily) a
CityDAO Citizen, who will hear both sides of the argument and attempt to mediate
between the two parties.

Step 2 - Random jury (Randomocracy)

Complaints that reach step 2 will be heard by a Kleros court. In case of
failure, the City Council can choose to use a randomly selected group of six (6)
CityDAO citizens using the Chainlink Verifiable Randomness Function (VRF). If
either party is not satisfied with the decision, they may appeal to a Kleros
appeals court.

Both parties must write a complaint document. This complaint of wrongdoing needs
to be complete and make specific allegations along with any evidence. Payment
for “jury duty” is $50 per person. This jury of 6 people will make a binding
decision based on the facts presented. The Executive Facilitator will enforce
the result by initiating a resolution that will go to the City Council to handle
the dispute accordingly.




For
180 votes91 %

Against
13 votes6 %

Abstain
4 votes2 %

3 months ago


CIP145 - ELECTIONS FOR THE CITYDAO MULTISIG



TL/DR: This is a proposal that seeks to: Establish a formal election process
(“CityDAO Election Process”) to be used initially for the CityDAO Multisig
(“Multisig Election”); Establish compensation and limited authority for the
Elected Multisig; Empower Walter Clapp as the Election Facilitator (@wdclapp
Discord handle) to administer the Multisig Election and all related aspects of
the election process; Compensate Walter (and any team members, as may be
determined by Walter in his discretion) for the efforts and undertakings
relating to #1, 2, and 3 above. Total target compensation = $9,000 (the
“Election Comp Pool”); which includes Walter’s compensation plus money available
to compensate assistant(s) at Walter’s sole discretion.) SECTION 3.05 of the
Operating Agreement states CityDAO’s purpose and mission as follows: “PURPOSE;
POWERS. CityDAO was established for the purpose and mission of exploring
decentralized governance mechanisms as well as establishing verification of
physical asset ownership, such as real property, on the Ethereum Blockchain.”
CityDAO has not spent adequate time or money on decentralized governance and
this CIP aims to change that dynamic. The time for elections at CityDAO is here.
Our First Election will be to Elect Members of the Multisig. According to Chat
GPT, “Here are some reasons why DAOs might use elections: Representation:
Elections allow DAO members to choose representatives who can make decisions on
their behalf. This can help ensure that the decisions made by the DAO are
aligned with the interests of its members.

Accountability: Elections can hold representatives accountable to the DAO
members. If representatives fail to perform their duties or act in a way that is
not in the best interests of the DAO, they can be removed from their positions
through a vote.

Transparency: Elections can provide transparency in the decision-making process.
All members have the opportunity to participate in the voting process and have a
say in the direction of the DAO. Efficiency: Elections can help DAOs make
decisions more efficiently. By delegating decision-making to elected
representatives, the DAO can avoid delays and inefficiencies that might result
from a more decentralized decision-making process.

Legitimacy: Elections can help legitimize the decisions made by the DAO. When
decisions are made through a transparent and democratic process, members are
more likely to accept and support them.” Currently - The “Multisig” is a body of
eight (8) individuals who own private keys that own and control the CityDAO Main
Safe Treasury. There are a few ways to manage a DAO Treasury and in the early
days CityDAO chose the centralized manner of establishing a Multi-signature
Smart Contract. Currently, 5 of 8 signers must sign a transaction to use money
from the DAO’s treasury. This CIP creates a Multisig election. Each seat will be
paid $200 per month. This CIP also confirms the Multisig authority to not sign
transactions if they violate any act of governance (CIP, Charter, or OA), or
violate US/Wyoming Law. Walter Clapp will oversee and implement the first
election of the current 8 Multisig seats pursuant to this CIP. Walter makes
sense as a licensed attorney, and his interest in reinvigorating the republic in
America, including a vision for a Constitutional Convention. Walter is also a
public candidate for President of the U.S. Walter can achieve the goal of
getting CityDAO from the appointed Multisig of today to the Elected Multisig of
CityDAO’s future. The election is intended to be completed by July 1, 2023.
Multisig members will be up for election every 1 year. July 2023 multisig
members will be replaced in July 2024 and so on. Unless a new CIP is passed to
amend this one, it will recur with automatic passage annually. Multisig members
may serve a maximum of two terms. Once this CIP passes, the CIP and election, to
completion, will be publicized by the DAO to Twitter, the Website, Discord,
Discourse, and via email. Nominations will be open to be submitted via Forum
(Discourse). Self-nominations are prohibited. Nominations will require the
person nominating to provide proof of humanity via a photo of their face with
the nominee’s name on a piece of paper held by the nominator. Nominations for
individuals will be subject to open Q&A, as well as limited debates that may be
hosted by Walter.

Eligibility: Nominees will be required to go through KYC and AML, and any other
legal hurdles required by the US or Wyoming law, prior to the vote. Nominations
will open upon passage of this CIP and shall close on June 1, 2023. Walter will
then compile a list of all qualified nominees for voting after the close of each
round of nominations.. A virtual synchronous election over a seven (7) day
period will occur via a CityDAO Citizen token gated discord channel (or
Snapshot) administered by Walter and other present admins. Each citizen will be
asked to rank their top eight (8) votes for the multisig. All citizens may only
vote one time. Walter will manually tabulate the winners pursuant to the rules
of rank choice voting, and publish the results on Snapshot for certification.
These new signers will be admitted to the Multisig within 24 hours of
certification. The next four (4) highest votes will be alternates. In the event
a Multisig member steps down, is removed, or otherwise unable to complete their
role, they shall be replaced by the alternate with the next most votes from the
election (and if they are not available, the second highest voted alternate
would be appointed, and so on). All 8 Multisig seats will begin receiving
compensation the month after the first four new Multisignators are elected. Any
tampering is expressly prohibited, including without limitation, Sybil Votes and
use of Sybil Wallets. If tampering is discovered, the user(s) will be banned
from multisig election voting for 1 year; and will be permanently banned from
elected positions at CityDAO, or CityDAO positions with budget authority. Walter
will work with current moderators and administrators to enforce these rules,
publish ample advance notice of the nominations and election, and any updated
rules of the election. Walter will publish a CIP to ratify the election and
compensation within 24 hours of the election closing. If the elected are not
ratified, this CIP will cease. Miscellaneous Terms of CIP-145 Term/Date of
Completion no later than September 1, 2023 (note – anticipated ASAP but
providing this outside date) The Facilitator role for this Election is a
non-replaceable role, meaning that the CIP is formally terminated if Walter is
not physically able to complete the election. Only a new CIP can establish a
different or alternate election procedure. As stated above, the process will be
finalized using a ratification CIP. Other CIPs relating to election
considerations or compensation for elected Multisig members may follow depending
on the nature of the process itself or its outcomes. Walter may use the
assistance of others as he deems necessary, including the discretion to provide
compensation from the Election Comp Pool in his discretion. Adjustments and
amendments allowed by Proposer or Walter prior to Snapshot, will be tracked, and
kept transparent in this Forum page. Payment of any amounts hereunder will be
made from the Main Treasury within five (5) days of submission of Utopia payment
request with reasonable supporting documentation as necessary.




For
98 votes98 %

Against
0 votes0 %

Abstain
1 votes1 %

3 months ago


HISTORICAL GOVERNANCE PARTICIPATION


Participants / Proposal
320320240240160160808000Aug '22Aug '22Sep '22Sep '22Oct '22Oct '22Nov '22Nov
'22Dec '22Dec '2220232023Feb '23Feb '23Mar '23Mar '23Apr '23Apr '23May '23May
'23



© 2023 CityDAO

Powered by

/