eu.clarionledger.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.194.62  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://cl.exct.net/?qs=9e425375705d522d1d9096a5c1bc71ca4dcf56700d6381af73c9294d928078bc19708c13d7175e0f7043b364e42d...
Effective URL: https://eu.clarionledger.com/story/news/local/2022/07/19/jackson-trash-pickup-contract-mayor-chokwe-antar-lumumba-city-counci...
Submission: On July 21 via api from US — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Skip to main content
 * Home
 * Elections
 * Business
 * News
 * Metro/State
 * MS Politics
 * National Politics
 * The American South
 * USA TODAY
 * Careers
 * Upside

Jackson's garbage contract dispute grows in tit-for-tat between mayor and
councilman





JACKSON'S GARBAGE CONTRACT DISPUTE GROWS IN TIT-FOR-TAT BETWEEN MAYOR AND
COUNCILMAN

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Wicker Perlis   | Mississippi Clarion Ledger


Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba gave an impassioned defense Monday
afternoon of his administration's actions in its ongoing dispute with the city
council over who picks up residents' trash.



In a news conference the following day, Councilmember Kenneth Stokes said the
mayor was wrong about what happened during bidding, also known as the request
for proposal or RFP process.

Lumumba's statements came during his weekly news conference, just 10 days after
he lost in court and only three after the city was sued by the company that is
currently collecting garbage.

"My position, our administration's position, is unchanged in this regard,"
Lumumba said. "From the start our goal and our objective has been to have a
contract or an agreement in place that works to the best interests of our
residents, and also to abide by a fair and legal procurement process. Those
things are necessary."



Richard's Disposal, a minority-owned business based in New Orleans, has been
picking up the city's trash since April 1 under an emergency contract enacted by
the mayor, without the council's approval, but they have yet to be paid. They
are now suing the city, seeking the $1.6 million that the council has thus far
refused to give them, citing the lack of a contract.



Richard’s Disposal: City of Jackson has not paid garbage company; Richard’s
Disposal files $1.6M lawsuit

Lumumba maintains that Richard's offered the lowest cost bid for trash
collection both with roll carts and without.

"First and foremost, we need a contract that we can afford," Lumumba said.

Stokes said Lumumba's statements were not accurate, pointing to the overall
score in a ranking system for the contractors. He said Waste Management, the
company with a competing bid against Richard's, had a higher score than
Richard's when collecting trash without roll carts.



"They were not the low bidder on both, as the mayor tried to indicate," Stokes
said. "The citizens of the City of Jackson deserve clarity. Doubling down on a
flawed RFP process is not helping. The mayor may be too close to the Richard's
bid."



Court sides with Jackson City Council: Mayor could not veto council's 'no' vote.

The difference between lowest cost and best overall score, which factors in
other things such as experience, qualifications and references, seems to be at
the core of the dispute between the mayor and the council. Richard's did have
the lowest cost for both proposals, but they only had the best total score for
providing services with carts. Stokes said the constituents he has heard from do
not want carts.

"That is not what the citizens want," Stokes said. "They do not want a cart.
They want their garbage to be picked up wherever they put it."

Lumumba has indicated he is likely to appeal the court ruling against him.

"Not only do we have pending litigation, but I anticipate the extension of more
legal action over the coming days," Lumumba said.



That said, during executive session Tuesday the city council voted not to allow
him to use public funds for his legal defense.

"You've got to pay for your own lawyer, and if you win the city will reimburse
you," Stokes said, painting it as a policy in line with past actions by the city
government.

Lumumba has argued he should not have to use personal funds for his legal
defense because he was sued by the city council, and they brought the suit
against him in his official role as mayor.

Facebook Twitter Email


Share your feedback to help improve our site!

 * Help
 * Terms of Service
 * Your California Privacy Rights/Privacy Policy
 * Privacy Policy
 * Site Map
 * Accessibility
 * Our Ethical Principles
 * Manage Cookies


© Copyright Gannett 2022



ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

Clicking on the (X) in the top right corner or clicking on the "Reject" button
retains the default setting of only strictly necessary cookies and "Always
Active" purposes as preset by the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) of
Europe.

We and our partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique
IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your choices
by clicking below or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will
be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data.Privacy Policy



WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS DATA TO ANALYZE WEBSITE PERFORMANCE AND TO DO THE
FOLLOWING:

Create a personalised content profile. Develop and improve products. Store
and/or access information on a device. Create a personalised ads profile.
Precise geolocation data, and identification through device scanning.
Personalised ads and content display, ad and content measurement, and audience
insights. List of Partners (vendors)

Reject Accept
Manage Cookies