www.politico.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:4400::ac40:9205  Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

GET https://www.politico.com/search

<form class="slide-search__form" action="https://www.politico.com/search" method="get">
  <input class="slide-search__input" type="search" name="q" id="searchTerm" aria-label="Search for any story" placeholder="Enter search term...">
  <button class="slide-search__run" type="submit" aria-label="Start search"><b class="bt-icon bt-icon--search"></b><span class="icon-text">Search</span></button>
  <button class="slide-search__close" id="search-close" type="button"><b class="bt-icon bt-icon--close" aria-label="Close Search"></b></button>
</form>

<form class="form-section">
  <input type="hidden" name="subscribeId" value="0000014f-1646-d88f-a1cf-5f46b7bd0000">
  <input type="hidden" name="processorId" value="00000179-61ab-d60d-a9f9-f5bf392e0000">
  <input type="hidden" name="validateEmail" value="true">
  <input type="hidden" name="enhancedSignUp" value="true">
  <input type="hidden" name="bot-field" value="" class="dn">
  <input type="hidden" name="subscriptionModule" value="newsletter_inline_standard_Playbook - POLITICO" class="dn">
  <input type="hidden" name="captchaUserToken" value="" autocomplete="off">
  <input type="hidden" name="captchaPublicKey" value="6LfS6L8UAAAAAAHCPhd7CF66ZbK8AyFfk3MslbKV" autocomplete="off">
  <div class="sign-up-21--msg sign-up-21--msg-spinner" aria-hidden="true">
    <div class="msg-content">
      <p>Loading</p>
      <svg class="sign-up-21--msg-icon-lg sign-up-21--spinner-icon-lg" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="#4D8AD2" stroke-width="1" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round">
        <line x1="12" y1="2" x2="12" y2="6"></line>
        <line x1="12" y1="18" x2="12" y2="22"></line>
        <line x1="4.93" y1="4.93" x2="7.76" y2="7.76"></line>
        <line x1="16.24" y1="16.24" x2="19.07" y2="19.07"></line>
        <line x1="2" y1="12" x2="6" y2="12"></line>
        <line x1="18" y1="12" x2="22" y2="12"></line>
        <line x1="4.93" y1="19.07" x2="7.76" y2="16.24"></line>
        <line x1="16.24" y1="7.76" x2="19.07" y2="4.93"></line>
      </svg>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="sign-up-21--msg sign-up-21--msg-completed" aria-live="assertive" aria-hidden="true">
    <div class="msg-content">
      <p>You will now start receiving email updates</p>
      <svg class="sign-up-21--msg-icon-lg" width="48" height="48" viewBox="0 0 48 48" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
        <path
          d="M44 22.1597V23.9997C43.9975 28.3126 42.601 32.5091 40.0187 35.9634C37.4363 39.4177 33.8066 41.9447 29.6707 43.1675C25.5349 44.3904 21.1145 44.2435 17.0689 42.7489C13.0234 41.2543 9.56931 38.4919 7.22192 34.8739C4.87453 31.2558 3.75958 26.9759 4.04335 22.6724C4.32712 18.3689 5.99441 14.2724 8.79656 10.9939C11.5987 7.71537 15.3856 5.43049 19.5924 4.48002C23.7992 3.52955 28.2005 3.9644 32.14 5.71973"
          stroke="#4D8AD2" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"></path>
        <path d="M44 8L24 28.02L18 22.02" stroke="#4D8AD2" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"></path>
      </svg>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="sign-up-21--msg sign-up-21--msg-already-subscribed" aria-live="assertive" aria-hidden="true">
    <div class="msg-content">
      <p>You are already subscribed</p>
      <svg class="sign-up-21--msg-icon-lg" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="1" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round">
        <path d="M14 9V5a3 3 0 0 0-3-3l-4 9v11h11.28a2 2 0 0 0 2-1.7l1.38-9a2 2 0 0 0-2-2.3zM7 22H4a2 2 0 0 1-2-2v-7a2 2 0 0 1 2-2h3"></path>
      </svg>
      <a href="/newsletters" target="_top"></a>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="sign-up-21--msg sign-up-21--msg-error" aria-live="assertive" aria-hidden="true">
    <div class="sign-up-21--msg-close">
      <svg width="20" height="20" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
        <path id="close" fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd"
          d="M17.513 16.6291L10.8839 9.99995L17.513 3.37082L16.6291 2.48694L10 9.11606L3.37088 2.48694L2.487 3.37082L9.11613 9.99995L2.487 16.6291L3.37088 17.513L10 10.8838L16.6291 17.513L17.513 16.6291Z" fill="#000"></path>
      </svg>
    </div>
    <div class="msg-content">
      <p style="color:#9E352C">Something went wrong</p>
    </div>
  </div>
  <fieldset class="form-container active">
    <div class="form-row row-email">
      <div class="form-row-container">
        <label class="data-form-label" for="email" aria-hidden="true">Email</label>
        <span class="sign-up-21--error-msg" aria-hidden="true">
          <span class="sign-up-21--exclamation">!</span>
          <span id="email-hint">Please make sure that the email address you typed in is valid</span>
        </span>
        <div class="form-row-container--input">
          <input type="email" name="subscribeEmail" aria-label="Email" placeholder="Your Email" required="">
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="form-row row-secondary-questions active">
      <div class="sign-up-21--secondary-questions-container">
        <div class="form-row-container">
          <label class="data-form-label" aria-hidden="true">Employer</label>
          <div class="form-row-container--input">
            <input type="text" name="job_employer" required="" aria-label="Employer" placeholder="Employer">
          </div>
        </div>
        <div class="form-row-container">
          <label class="data-form-label" aria-hidden="true">Job Title</label>
          <div class="form-row-container--input">
            <input type="text" name="job_title" required="" aria-label="Job Title" placeholder="Job Title">
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="form-row row-notice">
      <span class="sign-up-21--notice">
        <span class="color-red">*</span> All fields must be completed to subscribe. </span>
      <button type="submit" class="submit-button" aria-disabled="true">Sign Up</button>
    </div>
    <div class="row-bottom">
      <p class="form-policy"> By signing up, you acknowledge and agree to our <a href="https://www.politico.com/privacy" target="_blank">Privacy Policy</a> and <a href="https://www.politico.com/terms-of-service" target="_blank">Terms of Service</a>.
        You may unsubscribe at any time by following the directions at the bottom of the email or by <a href="https://www.politico.com/feedback" target="_blank">contacting us here</a>. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
        <a href="https://policies.google.com/privacy" target="_blank">Privacy Policy</a> and <a href="https://policies.google.com/terms" target="_blank">Terms of Service</a> apply. </p>
      <button type="submit" class="submit-button" aria-disabled="true"> Sign Up </button>
    </div>
  </fieldset>
</form>

Text Content

Skip to Main Content


POLITICO POLITICO LOGO

 * Congress
 * Pro
 * E&E News
 * Search
   Search


WASHINGTON & POLITICS

 * Congress
 * White House
 * Elections
 * Legal
 * Magazine
 * Foreign Affairs


2024 ELECTIONS

 * News
 * Results
 * GOP Candidate Tracker


STATE POLITICS & POLICY

 * California
 * Florida
 * New Jersey
 * New York


GLOBAL POLITICS & POLICY

 * Brussels
 * Canada
 * United Kingdom


POLICY NEWS

 * Agriculture
 * Cannabis
 * Cybersecurity
 * Defense
 * Education
 * Energy & Environment
 * Finance & Tax
 * Health Care
 * Immigration
 * Labor
 * Sustainability
 * Technology
 * Trade
 * Transportation


NEWSLETTERS

 * Playbook
 * Playbook PM
 * West Wing Playbook
 * POLITICO Nightly
 * POLITICO Weekend
 * The Recast
 * Inside Congress
 * All Newsletters


COLUMNISTS

 * Alex Burns
 * John Harris
 * Jonathan Martin
 * Michael Schaffer
 * Jack Shafer
 * Nahal Toosi
 * Victoria Guida


SERIES & MORE

 * Breaking News Alerts
 * Podcasts
 * Video
 * The Fifty
 * Women Rule
 * Matt Wuerker Cartoons
 * Cartoon Carousel


POLITICO LIVE

 * Upcoming Events
 * Previous Events


FOLLOW US

 * Twitter
 * Instagram
 * Facebook

 * My Account
 * Log In Log Out



Congress


HOW CONGRESS DEFANGED BIDEN’S BIG SCIENCE PUSH

Congress has fully funded the CHIPS and Science Act’s subsidies for chipmakers.
But lawmakers are poised to slash the budgets of federal agencies driving future
scientific and technological advances.



An employee holds a silicon wafer with chips etched into it at Applied Materials
in Sunnyvale, California, on May 22, 2023. | Jim Wilson/AFP via Getty Images

By Christine Mui

03/09/2024 07:00 AM EST

 * 
 * 

 * * Link Copied
 * * 
   * 
   * 

The bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act — a law President Joe Biden name checked in
his State of the Union address — was designed to flood the microchip industry
with cash and shore up America’s commitment to basic research.

Two years in, Congress has fully funded subsidies for chipmakers. The big boost
in science, however, is way off target.



While nearly $53 billion is going into reviving a homegrown semiconductor
industry, Congress has gnawed away at the law’s ambitions on fundamental
research and development aimed at staying ahead of China and other rivals in
competitive fields like artificial intelligence.



The reductions come even as Biden touted Thursday that the law has the U.S.
“investing more in research and development than ever before.”

The latest example is the spending package lawmakers advanced over the past
week: Biden’s signature enacts deep cuts to the National Science Foundation and
stalls key offices in the Commerce and Energy departments that are supposed to
deploy CHIPS money, turning a promised cash infusion of $200 billion over a
decade into a humiliating haircut. And while it’s hardly the first time Congress
has reneged on promised funds, it threatens an important pillar of Biden’s
industrial policy.

“These aren’t the numbers I’d like to see. I’m disappointed that we can’t
provide funding to match what we authorized in CHIPS and Science,” House Science
Chair Frank Lucas (R-Okla.) told POLITICO in an email. “Unfortunately, in our
current fiscal environment we have to make difficult decisions and that’s
reflected in the budgets for these agencies.”



By contrast, rival tech powers are doubling down: China, despite its slowing
economy, just this week pledged to raise R&D spending by 10 percent, to $51.5
billion, this year.

Sudip Parikh, CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, a
Washington-based science nonprofit, said the global competition for advanced
technologies like AI, quantum and fusion would have decades-long implications.

“Once you lose the lead in that kind of a race, the benefits accrue to whoever’s
in the lead, and they’ve been accruing to us for the last 75 years,” he said in
an interview. “They will accrue somewhere else.”


‘FAILURE TO LAUNCH’

The National Science Foundation offers a window onto the broader challenge, as
the agency that expected to gain the most from CHIPS. The law authorized NSF to
receive $81 billion over a five-year period that would ultimately double the
agency’s budget by 2027. This year, the NSF should have gotten $15.64 billion,
according to the CHIPS Act.




Under the latest spending deal, lawmakers provided NSF with $9.06 billion — 42
percent short of the CHIPS target and an 8 percent cut to its current budget.

“There will be real impacts across the research enterprise with this reduction,”
an NSF spokesperson told POLITICO. “It is difficult to place this in the context
of rapid, large-scale science investments by our competitors such as China.”



CHIPS established an office for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships (TIP) —
the NSF’s first new directorate in more than three decades. TIP’s mission is to
help critical discoveries in semiconductors, AI, quantum computing,
biotechnology and other technologies make the leap into real-world applications.

In December, TIP announced it would channel $100 million over the next four
years between 18 universities to turn more scientific breakthroughs into tech
innovations. Erwin Gianchandani, who leads the directorate, told POLITICO he was
not sure the program could expand to more universities.

“It’s the future rounds that are going to be tied to future appropriations,” he
said.

Another major NSF program awarded $15 million of seed money to each of ten teams
across the country in the hopes of growing new regional hubs of tech R&D and
innovation. There’s potential for a $1.6 billion prize, split among the teams,
which CHIPS authorized but Congress has not appropriated.

Without that funding, Parikh said, “it would be a pilot that’s permanently a
pilot. You have failure to launch.”

Asked about how Biden’s comments square with appropriations, the Office of
Management and Budget pointed to its March 5 statement that said, “This
bipartisan legislation represents a compromise and neither side got everything
it wanted.”


YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR

Other agencies that CHIPS designated as critical to training future STEM
workers, modernizing research facilities and setting up tech hubs also saw
appropriations far short of their targets under the law.

CHIPS authorized $67 billion to the Department of Energy, largely its Office of
Science, over five years to support basic research activities, upgrade national
lab infrastructure and establish new clean energy tech programs. The law
authorized this year’s budget for the office at $9.54 billion, but the spending
deal appropriated $8.24 billion.

The law also authorized $10 billion over five years to the Commerce Department’s
Economic Development Administration to invest “directly in burgeoning,
high-potential U.S. regions” aspiring to become tech hubs away from centers like
Silicon Valley. Last year, Congress appropriated $500 million to launch the
program, which will award up to $70 million each to as many as eight hubs by
summer. This year, Congress directed only $41 million to the program — likely
cutting short the chance of running additional rounds for now.


MOST READ


 1. THE MYSTERY SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT SCHOOLING CONGRESS ON HOW TO DO ITS JOB


 2. TRUMP RELEASED A SNEAKER LINE. HERE’S HOW TO WEAR THEM.


 3. NO LABELS DELEGATES VOTE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PRESIDENTIAL TICKET


 4. KATIE PORTER PULLED A TRUMP MOVE AFTER LOSING. DEMOCRATS ARE LIVID.


 5. BIDEN CHOOSES A HAMMER OVER AN OLIVE BRANCH



“Congress can get what they pay for,” agency spokesperson Jonathan Lovitz said
in an interview, noting he has “so much hope for funding being met where it
needs to be.”

Also at the Commerce Department, CHIPS authorized $1.65 billion this year to the
National Institute of Standards and Technology for its work with U.S.
manufacturers, and to research and set standards for industries of the future
like AI and cybersecurity. Instead, Congress cut NIST’s current budget by 11
percent, falling short of the CHIPS target.

The problem is not unique to CHIPS. Last summer’s debt limit deal flatlined all
non-defense funding and “hit all agencies very hard,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen
(D-N.H.), who chairs the Senate Appropriations subcommittee overseeing spending
at the Commerce Department and federal science agencies.

“I think the work will go on. I would like to fund it at a higher level, but the
House has not been willing to do that,” she said about NIST’s budget.

Science funding has seen some of this playbook before. Much of the 2007 America
COMPETES Act, which also pledged funding for agencies like NSF, was never
implemented. Still, this year has been particularly chaotic, with agencies
relying on stopgap measures for months. Moreover, this year’s cuts compound
shortfalls from last year’s appropriations.

“It’s hard to imagine Congress fully playing catch up in a couple of years after
underfunding research investments now,” said Matt Hourihan, associate director
of R&D and advanced industry at the Federation of American Scientists.

It’s not clear yet if Congress will have the appetite to bridge the gap in next
year’s annual appropriations or provide additional funding through a
supplemental.

Lucas said he will continue to push for strong R&D funding in future spending
bills.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who sponsored the House legislation that became the
science section of CHIPS, said in an email that he would “try and make up the
difference going forward.”

Mohar Chatterjee contributed to this report.


 * Filed under:
 * Congress,
 * Joe Biden,
 * Joe Biden 2024,
 * Government Spending,
 * Department Of Energy


POLITICO
 * 
 * 

 * * Link Copied
 * * 
   * 
   * 


PLAYBOOK

The unofficial guide to official Washington, every morning and weekday
afternoons.


Playbook

The unofficial guide to official Washington, every morning and weekday
afternoons.

By signing up, you acknowledge and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of
Service. You may unsubscribe at any time by following the directions at the
bottom of the email or by contacting us here. This site is protected by
reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Loading

You will now start receiving email updates

You are already subscribed

Something went wrong

Email ! Please make sure that the email address you typed in is valid

Employer

Job Title

* All fields must be completed to subscribe. Sign Up

By signing up, you acknowledge and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of
Service. You may unsubscribe at any time by following the directions at the
bottom of the email or by contacting us here. This site is protected by
reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sign Up

SPONSORED CONTENT
Recommended by



 * About Us
 * Advertising
 * Breaking News Alerts
 * Careers
 * Credit Card Payments
 * Digital Edition
 * FAQ
 * Feedback
 * Headlines
 * Photos
 * POWERJobs
 * Press
 * Print Subscriptions
 * Request A Correction
 * Write For Us
 * RSS
 * Site Map

 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information and Opt Out of Targeted
   Advertising

© 2024 POLITICO LLC





COOKIE SETTINGS

At this time, only residents from certain U.S. States have the right to opt-out.
To disable cookies, please use your device settings. You can learn more about
our privacy practices by reading our Privacy Policy


COOKIES

STRICTLY NECESSARY COOKIES

Always Active

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched
off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you
which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy
preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block
or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.

ADVERTISING, ANALYTICS, FUNCTIONAL AND PERFORMANCE COOKIES

Always Active



Back Button


COOKIE LIST



Search Icon
Filter Icon

Clear
checkbox label label
Apply Cancel
Consent Leg.Interest
checkbox label label
checkbox label label
checkbox label label

Confirm My Choices