msrc.microsoft.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
2620:1ec:48:1::45
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2024-29987
Effective URL: https://msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2024-29987
Submission: On April 22 via api from BE — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2024-29987
Submission: On April 22 via api from BE — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOMText Content
You need to enable JavaScript to run this app. Skip to main contentMicrosoft MSRC Security Updates Acknowledgements Feedback and Support Sign in to your account Sign in We use optional cookies to improve your experience on our websites, such as through social media connections, and to display personalized advertising based on your online activity. If you reject optional cookies, only cookies necessary to provide you the services will be used. You may change your selection by clicking “Manage Cookies” at the bottom of the page. Privacy Statement Third-Party Cookies Accept Reject Manage cookies 1. MSRC MSRC 2. Customer Guidance Customer Guidance 3. Security Update Guide Security Update Guide 4. Advisories Advisories 5. CVE 2024 29987 CVE 2024 29987 MICROSOFT EDGE (CHROMIUM-BASED) INFORMATION DISCLOSURE VULNERABILITY NEW On this page CVE-2024-29987 Subscribe RSS PowerShell API Security Vulnerability Released: Apr 18, 2024 Assigning CNA: Microsoft CVE-2024-29987 Impact: Information Disclosure Max Severity: Low CVSS Source: Microsoft CVSS:3.1 6.5 / 5.7 Base score metrics: 6.5 / Temporal score metrics: 5.7 Base score metrics: 6.5 / Temporal score metrics: 5.7 Expand all Collapse all Metric Value Base score metrics(8) Attack Vector This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. The Base Score increases the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable component. Network The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers). Attack Complexity This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability. Such conditions may require the collection of more information about the target or computational exceptions. The assessment of this metric excludes any requirements for user interaction in order to exploit the vulnerability. If a specific configuration is required for an attack to succeed, the Base metrics should be scored assuming the vulnerable component is in that configuration. Low Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component. Privileges Required This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability. None The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack. User Interaction This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise the vulnerable component. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner. Required Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. Scope Does a successful attack impact a component other than the vulnerable component? If so, the Base Score increases and the Confidentiality, Integrity and Authentication metrics should be scored relative to the impacted component. Unchanged An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority. Confidentiality This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones. High There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. Integrity This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. None There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component. Availability This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. It refers to the loss of availability of the impacted component itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of an impacted component. None There is no impact to availability within the impacted component. Temporal score metrics(3) Exploit Code Maturity This metric measures the likelihood of the vulnerability being attacked, and is typically based on the current state of exploit techniques, exploit code availability, or active, 'in-the-wild' exploitation. Unproven No exploit code is available, or an exploit is theoretical. Remediation Level The Remediation Level of a vulnerability is an important factor for prioritization. The typical vulnerability is unpatched when initially published. Workarounds or hotfixes may offer interim remediation until an official patch or upgrade is issued. Each of these respective stages adjusts the temporal score downwards, reflecting the decreasing urgency as remediation becomes final. Official Fix A complete vendor solution is available. Either the vendor has issued an official patch, or an upgrade is available. Report Confidence This metric measures the degree of confidence in the existence of the vulnerability and the credibility of the known technical details. Sometimes only the existence of vulnerabilities are publicized, but without specific details. For example, an impact may be recognized as undesirable, but the root cause may not be known. The vulnerability may later be corroborated by research which suggests where the vulnerability may lie, though the research may not be certain. Finally, a vulnerability may be confirmed through acknowledgement by the author or vendor of the affected technology. The urgency of a vulnerability is higher when a vulnerability is known to exist with certainty. This metric also suggests the level of technical knowledge available to would-be attackers. Confirmed Detailed reports exist, or functional reproduction is possible (functional exploits may provide this). Source code is available to independently verify the assertions of the research, or the author or vendor of the affected code has confirmed the presence of the vulnerability. Please see Common Vulnerability Scoring System for more information on the definition of these metrics. EXPLOITABILITY The following table provides an exploitability assessment for this vulnerability at the time of original publication. Publicly disclosed Exploited Exploitability assessment No No Exploitation Less Likely FAQ What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability? The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is sensitive information. Why is the severity for this CVE rated as Moderate, but the CVSS score is higher than normal? Per our severity guidelines, the amount of user interaction or preconditions required to allow this sort of exploitation downgraded the severity, specifically it says, "If a bug requires more than a click, a key press, or several preconditions, the severity will be downgraded". The CVSS scoring system doesn't allow for this type of nuance. According to the CVSS metric, user interaction is required (UI:R). What interaction would the user have to do? The user would have to click on a specially crafted URL to be compromised by the attacker. Microsoft Edge Channel Microsoft Edge Version Date Released Based on Chromium Version Stable 124.0.2478.51 4/18/2024 124.0.6367.60/.61 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS * Narendra Bhati with Lead Penetration Tester at Suma Soft Pvt. Ltd. India Microsoft recognizes the efforts of those in the security community who help us protect customers through coordinated vulnerability disclosure. See Acknowledgements for more information. SECURITY UPDATES To determine the support lifecycle for your software, see the Microsoft Support Lifecycle. Updates CVSS Release date Descending Edit columns Download Filters Release date Product Platform Impact Max Severity Article Download Build Number Apr 18, 2024 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) - Information Disclosure Low * Release Notes * Security Update * 124.0.2478.51 All results loaded Loaded all 1 rows DISCLAIMER The information provided in the Microsoft Knowledge Base is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Microsoft disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation may not apply. REVISIONS version revisionDate description 1.0 Apr 18, 2024 Information published. How satisfied are you with the MSRC Security Update Guide? Rating Broken Bad Below average Average Great!