reason.com Open in urlscan Pro
75.2.24.81  Public Scan

URL: https://reason.com/2024/01/26/josh-hawley-thinks-the-white-house-can-force-an-aluminum-plant-to-stay-open/
Submission Tags: trump gop republican right wing extremist maga eu europe european union progressive democrat Search All
Submission: On February 13 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 3 forms found in the DOM

GET https://reason.com/

<form role="search" method="get" class="search-form" action="https://reason.com/">
  <label>
    <span class="screen-reader-text">Search for:</span>
    <input type="search" class="search-field" placeholder="Search …" value="" name="s">
  </label>
  <input type="submit" class="search-submit" value="Search">
</form>

POST

<form method="post" id="gform_0" class="recaptcha-v3-initialized"><input type="hidden" name="login_redirect" value="/2024/01/26/josh-hawley-thinks-the-white-house-can-force-an-aluminum-plant-to-stay-open/">
  <div class="gform_heading">
    <h3 class="gform_title">Login Form</h3>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_body">
    <div id="gform_fields_login" class="gform_fields top_label">
      <div id="field_0_1" class="gfield gfield--type-text gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_1"><label class="gfield_label gform-field-label"
          for="input_1">Username<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_text"><input name="input_1" id="input_1" type="text" value="" class="" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false"> </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_0_2" class="gfield gfield--type-text gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_2"><label class="gfield_label gform-field-label"
          for="input_2">Password<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_text"><input name="input_2" id="input_2" type="password" value="" class="" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false"> </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_0_3" class="gfield gfield--type-remember_me field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below hidden_label gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_0_3"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label screen-reader-text gfield_label_before_complex"></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_checkbox">
          <div class="gfield_checkbox" id="input_3">
            <div class="gchoice gchoice_3">
              <input class="gfield-choice-input" name="input_3.1" type="checkbox" value="1" id="choice_3">
              <label for="choice_3" id="label_3">Remember Me</label>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_footer top_label"> <button type="submit" id="gform_submit_button_0" class="gform_button button"
      onclick="if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]){return false;}  if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]=true;}  "
      onkeypress="if( event.keyCode == 13 ){ if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]){return false;} if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_0&quot;]=true;}  jQuery(&quot;#gform_0&quot;).trigger(&quot;submit&quot;,[true]); }">Login</button>
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="is_submit_0" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_submit" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_unique_id" value="">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="state_0" value="WyJbXSIsIjVmZDk0MDRiMTc0NTYwODJmYTIwNGZlZDYxN2ViYzJjIl0=">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_target_page_number_0" id="gform_target_page_number_0" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_source_page_number_0" id="gform_source_page_number_0" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_field_values" value="">
  </div>
</form>

POST /2024/01/26/josh-hawley-thinks-the-white-house-can-force-an-aluminum-plant-to-stay-open/#gf_17

<form method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" target="gform_ajax_frame_17" id="gform_17" class="puprf-signup-widget recaptcha-v3-initialized" action="/2024/01/26/josh-hawley-thinks-the-white-house-can-force-an-aluminum-plant-to-stay-open/#gf_17"
  data-formid="17" novalidate="">
  <div class="gf_invisible ginput_recaptchav3" data-sitekey="6LeMnkUaAAAAALL8T1-XAyB7vxpOeTExu6KwR48-" data-tabindex="0"><input id="input_9ae663dc72ef42b46f2cf3a53ec042e1" class="gfield_recaptcha_response" type="hidden"
      name="input_9ae663dc72ef42b46f2cf3a53ec042e1" value=""></div>
  <div class="gform-body gform_body">
    <div id="gform_fields_17" class="gform_fields top_label form_sublabel_below description_below">
      <div id="field_17_1" class="gfield gfield--type-email gfield_contains_required field_sublabel_below gfield--no-description field_description_below hidden_label gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_17_1"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label" for="input_17_1">Email<span class="gfield_required"><span class="gfield_required gfield_required_text">(Required)</span></span></label>
        <div class="ginput_container ginput_container_email">
          <input name="input_1" id="input_17_1" type="email" value="" class="large" placeholder="Email Address" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false">
        </div>
      </div>
      <div id="field_17_2" class="gfield gfield--type-honeypot gform_validation_container field_sublabel_below gfield--has-description field_description_below gfield_visibility_visible" data-js-reload="field_17_2"><label
          class="gfield_label gform-field-label" for="input_17_2">Phone</label>
        <div class="ginput_container"><input name="input_2" id="input_17_2" type="text" value="" autocomplete="new-password"></div>
        <div class="gfield_description" id="gfield_description_17_2">This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.</div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="gform_footer top_label"> <button type="submit" id="gform_submit_button_17" class="gform_button button"
      onclick="if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]){return false;}  if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]=true;}  "
      onkeypress="if( event.keyCode == 13 ){ if(window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]){return false;} if( !jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity || jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;)[0].checkValidity()){window[&quot;gf_submitting_17&quot;]=true;}  jQuery(&quot;#gform_17&quot;).trigger(&quot;submit&quot;,[true]); }">Submit</button>
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_ajax" value="form_id=17&amp;title=&amp;description=1&amp;tabindex=0&amp;theme=data-form-theme='gravity-theme'">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="is_submit_17" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_submit" value="17">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_unique_id" value="">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="state_17" value="WyJbXSIsIjVmZDk0MDRiMTc0NTYwODJmYTIwNGZlZDYxN2ViYzJjIl0=">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_target_page_number_17" id="gform_target_page_number_17" value="0">
    <input type="hidden" class="gform_hidden" name="gform_source_page_number_17" id="gform_source_page_number_17" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" name="gform_field_values" value="">
  </div>
  <p style="display: none !important;" class="akismet-fields-container" data-prefix="ak_"><label>Δ<textarea name="ak_hp_textarea" cols="45" rows="8" maxlength="100"></textarea></label><input type="hidden" id="ak_js_1" name="ak_js"
      value="1707791517539">
    <script>
      document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value", (new Date()).getTime());
    </script>
  </p>
</form>

Text Content

 * Latest
 * Magazine
   * Current Issue
   * Archives
   * Subscribe
   * Crossword
 * Video
 * Podcasts
   * All Shows
   * The Reason Roundtable
   * The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
   * The Soho Forum Debates
   * Just Asking Questions
   * The Best of Reason Magazine
   * Why We Can't Have Nice Things
 * Volokh
 * Newsletters
 * Donate
   * Donate Online
   * Donate Crypto
   * Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
   * Torchbearer Society
   * Planned Giving
 * Subscribe
   * Print/Digital Subscriptions
   * Gift Subscriptions

Search for:


LOGIN FORM

Username(Required)

Password(Required)

Remember Me
Login
Create new account
Forgot password


Economics


JOSH HAWLEY THINKS THE WHITE HOUSE CAN FORCE AN ALUMINUM PLANT TO STAY OPEN


SHOULD THERE BE ANY LIMITS TO A PRESIDENT'S POWER TO CENTRALLY PLAN THE ECONOMY?
APPARENTLY NOT.

Eric Boehm | 1.26.2024 1:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly
versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom)

In response to the news that an aluminum smelting plant in southern Missouri
will soon close, Sen. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.) has asked—nay, demanded—that President
Joe Biden use his powers to keep the plant open.

"I urge you to take the appropriate actions necessary to keep the smelter open,
to ensure the continuity of operations, and to preserve production
jobs—including by deploying the authorities of the Defense Production Act of
1950," Hawley wrote in a letter to the White House this week. "Doing so will
preserve good-paying union jobs and safeguard national security."

The modern presidency has tremendous powers, of course, but this is still quite
the stretch. Hawley is asking the White House to engage in central planning at
an absurdly micro-level—and there is, thankfully, no law that actually allows
the president to order a factory to continue producing aluminum if its owners
have decided to stop.

Even so, the fact that Hawley is even making this request illustrates something
important about how Republicans now view the relationship between government and
business. It also says something about how the failures of protectionism will
spur calls for more protectionism. And, finally, about how the phrase "national
security" has become warped beyond recognition to justify further governmental
intrusions into the economy.

Powered By

00:00/03:11
10 Sec


Some Multistrat Hedge Funds Keep Over Half of Profits




Next
Stay





But let's start with the Defense Production Act, which allows presidents to
expedite governmental purchases of certain materials viewed as critical to
national defense. Though it had been rarely used before the COVID-19 pandemic,
it has recently become a favorite tool of would-be economic authoritarians on
both sides of the aisle, and some lawmakers now seem to believe there are
virtually no limits to how it can be used. Democrats have asked Biden to use it
to promote green energy projects, and Biden has already invoked it to
"accelerate domestic production" of solar panels under the questionable notion
that solar panels are "essential to the national defense." Even home insulation
is now the subject of a Defense Production Act order, because it is somehow
critical to defending America from a foreign invasion—of cold air, one assumes,
likely a nefarious plot by those shifty Canadians.

The act was also invoked during the baby formula shortage of 2022, as if a
government-created problem could be solved by the White House simply demanding
that more formula be brought into existence. That's how economies work, right?

It might shock Hawley and some of his colleagues to learn that the Defense
Production Act is not a set of magic words that allow presidents to do whatever
they'd like. In fact, all the law does is require that businesses fulfill orders
from the government before other orders from private customers.

That's because it is a law meant to be used during wartime. Here's how it works:
Let's say there's a war going on and the U.S. military desperately needs 10,000
widgets to ensure victory, lasting peace, and blah blah blah. The Pentagon sends
a guy to the widget factory in Albuquerque to request those 10,000 widgets, but
the owner of the factory says the 10,000 widgets sitting on his lot have already
been purchased by his friend Bob and that the government will have to wait until
the factory can produce another 10,000 widgets—so come back in two weeks.



Ah, but wait! The president just signed an order invoking the Defense Production
Act for widgets, so now the guy from the Pentagon gets to cut the line. He can
buy those 10,000 widgets, and Bob has to wait for the next set to come off the
assembly line.

That's what the Defense Production Act allows. It can't conjure up new solar
panels or additional supplies of insulation out of thin air. It doesn't allow
the government to put a gun to anyone's head and force them to make baby formula
or to keep an aluminum smelter running.

And that's good. Let's consider for a moment the alternative reality where
Hawley apparently resides—a reality where the Defense Production Act somehow
gives the sitting president the power to shape not only whole industries but to
direct exactly what products are manufactured in which places. Sure, why
shouldn't presidents have the authority to decide how many people are employed
in which factories all across the country?

Once, I might have asked a different rhetorical question about whether
conservatives would want to live in a country where the president had such
immense powers over the market—but it is now increasingly apparent that many of
them do. That's a seriously toxic problem in our politics right now: large
portions of both major parties are committed to the idea that more central
planning and a more powerful chief executive would benefit the country
economically. And that's why there is so much chatter about the Defense
Production Act, and why the federal government is wasting so much money on other
centrally planned boondoggles.

Hawley's call for more government intervention to protect aluminum manufacturing
jobs should also spur some reflection about the last major government
intervention that was supposed to protect aluminum manufacturing jobs. Remember
those 10 percent tariffs on imported aluminum imposed by then-President Donald
Trump in 2018? That was naked protectionism, and the announced closure of this
Missouri smelter seems like pretty good evidence that it failed. There's other
evidence too: As Hawley points out in his letter, this is the third aluminum
smelter in the U.S. to announce plans to downsize in recent months.
Unfortunately, the failures of protectionism only ever seem to spur calls for
more protectionism.



Finally, let's address the idea that American national security is somehow
weakened by the closure of a single aluminum plant that employs 400 people. In
some ways, this is the crux of Hawley's argument for the federal government to
get involved. In that letter to the White House, he wrote that "the impending
shutdown of the smelter will also materially degrade our defense posture, as the
Department of Defense has deemed aluminum a strategic material of interest."

It's true that the United States does not produce enough aluminum to meet its
annual demand, which is why we imported 5.9 million metric tons of it in 2022.
But here's the good news: there is plenty of aluminum available on the global
market—and there would be more if the Biden administration lifted those tariffs.
In 2022, more than 41 percent of the aluminum imported to the U.S. came from
Canada and Mexico, hardly places that are likely to cut off trade in the event
of a war. South Korea and Australia, also close U.S. allies, are the
fastest-growing suppliers of aluminum to the United States.

It is, of course, unfortunate that the closing of this aluminum smelter means
about 400 workers will be out of a job. Hopefully, they will quickly find
others. Tragic as it might be in the short term, this is the sort of thing that
happens all the time in healthy economic systems, where resources (including
labor) are constantly in flux.

The idea that the closure of a single aluminum plant is a national security
crisis that should require the direct intervention of the White House is,
frankly, insane. By demanding that Biden get involved, Hawley is suggesting that
there should be effectively no limits to a president's power to intervene in the
economy—exactly the sort of unchecked expansion of executive power that
Republicans used to understand would be dangerous and counterproductive.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and
trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

Email(Required)

Phone

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Submit

Δ

NEXT: Study: If You Let People Buy Beer at Grocery Stores, the Liquor Stores
Still Survive

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

EconomicsEconomic NationalismCentral planningJosh HawleyJoe BidenBiden
AdministrationExecutive PowerTariffsFree TradeMissouri
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly
versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (89)


LATEST

SCOTUS IS TROUBLED BY THE CLAIM THAT STATES CAN DISQUALIFY TRUMP FROM THE
ELECTION AS AN INSURRECTIONIST

Jacob Sullum | 2.12.2024 1:35 PM

PROTECT ACT COULD REQUIRE REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING PORN ONLINE

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 2.12.2024 12:00 PM

BIDEN'S BIZARRE 'SHRINKFLATION' NONSENSE

Eric Boehm | 2.12.2024 11:15 AM

DELINQUENT COUNTRIES

Liz Wolfe | 2.12.2024 9:30 AM

JOE BIDEN'S NO GOOD, VERY BAD DAY

J.D. Tuccille | 2.12.2024 7:00 AM





 * About
 * Browse Topics
 * Events
 * Staff
 * Jobs
 * Donate
 * Advertise
 * Subscribe
 * Contact
 * Media
 * Shop
 * Amazon

Reason FacebookReason TwitterReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeReason
ItunesReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of
Service apply.



Notifications