www.gartner.com Open in urlscan Pro
18.239.69.38  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://www.gartner.com/reprints/?id=1-2F88J6D7&ct=231006&st=sb%20
Effective URL: https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-2F88J6D7&ct=231006&st=sb%20
Submission: On December 12 via manual from DE — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

 

Licensed for Distribution

Licensed for Distribution

This research note is restricted to the personal use of ().


2023 STRATEGIC ROADMAP FOR SOURCE-TO-PAY TECHNOLOGY

26 April 2023 - ID G00767116 - 22 min read
By Micky Keck, Lynne Phelan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transforming the procurement technology portfolio requires understanding where
technology is now, where it is going and how to get there. Procurement and IT
leaders should use this research to guide their long-term strategy and the steps
they must take to deliver their vision.



OVERVIEW




KEY FINDINGS

 * Sourcing, contract management and spend analytics technologies represent
   excellent opportunities to introduce AI-enhanced automation while controlling
   risk.
 * Procurement technology stacks are often assembled over time as a procurement
   organization matures. This piecemeal approach limits integrations across the
   end-to-end process and reduces automation opportunities.
 * Fragmented back-end ERP and financial systems force users to learn multiple
   systems and reduce data integrity.




RECOMMENDATIONS

Procurement and IT leaders should:
 * Maximize the return on technology investments by implementing solutions that
   enhance the workforce through the use of AI/ML technologies and deliver
   smarter analytics and improved efficiency.
 * Maximize automation by optimizing how functional modules interact from a
   reporting, work handoff and collaboration perspective. Compare existing
   capabilities against the future-state capabilities in this research to
   identify gaps.
 * Standardize master data and reduce technical complexity by using sourcing and
   procurement systems as a simplification layer that reduces complexity for end
   users.




INTRODUCTION

Procurement technology leaders are faced with the daunting task of arming the
organization with the optimal technology across the wide source-to-pay (S2P)
process. However, the demands to quickly modernize operations often forces very
tactical investment decisions that weaken the impact of future technology.
Without a complete vision of what an intelligent and hyperautomated technology
landscape could look like, procurement technology leaders are bound to make
investment decisions that will not hold up over the long term. What if there was
a way to know not only what technologies are out there, but how they could work
together as a force multiplier with each additional investment? This strategic
roadmap research will cover what capabilities to look for and how to build a
long-term plan that includes the art of the possible, rather than just what is
needed now.

Modern organizations should view sourcing and procurement technology as a
strategic force multiplier, rather than as simple tools to complete specific
tasks. Enhanced, extensible technology across the source-to-pay spectrum (S2P)
is becoming widely available, but this forces a rethinking of how to buy and
deploy these solutions to maximize their effectiveness. Building a world-class
S2P technology infrastructure requires embracing a highly automated and
integrated future state where sourcing and procurement is consumerized and open
to everyone.

The move to an intelligent, highly automated S2P technology stack does require
change on multiple fronts.
 * Clean data must be accessible in abundance to train AI engines.
 * Processes and policies will need to be updated and optimized so clear rules
   and boundaries can be encapsulated into automation engines.
 * Organizational trust in AI must be built. AI should make decisions that are
   not obvious, but that does not mean that its decisions are incorrect. Staff
   and leadership need to get comfortable with the fact that, in some cases, AI
   should be trusted to run without requiring constant oversight.


The sum result of these changes is that sourcing and procurement capacity will
be increased, as will compliance with organizational goals and policies — all
with the same or less resources.

Each organization will start this journey from a different place, some may have
little or outdated starting technology, others may have many of the building
blocks in place. The key to getting to the future state is to know what to look
for, and what needs to change to maximize the return on the technology
investment.

Figure 1 shows the roadmap to move to that future state.

Figure 1: Strategic Roadmap for S2P Applications








FUTURE STATE

Sourcing and procurement applications are evolving into tightly integrated
solutions, even if solutions from multiple vendors are required. Organizations
will benefit from consistent data models and real-time integrations that will
facilitate hyperautomated processes that border on autonomous operations.
Additionally, shared intelligence that solutions will bring from their larger
customer base will further enhance decision making, cost reductions and risk
avoidance.

The key technologies that will underpin these advancements include:
 * Cloud-based applications with API-enabled interfaces that allow for
   development of unique capabilities without requiring customization that would
   silo users into hard to upgrade technology.
 * Machine learning models based on very large multicustomer datasets that allow
   for predictive decision support engines beyond what any single organization
   could build on their own.
 * High-quality supplier data sources and networks that enable automated
   onboarding, sourcing, collaboration and risk management capabilities.
 * Document digitization, classification and analysis technologies that shrink
   the time and effort required to manage key sourcing and procurement
   documents.
 * Anywhere user experience for exposing functionality where a user works,
   eliminating training for most users.
 * Applications automatically syndicate master data enabling a single data
   model.
 * Generative AI assisting with the automation of text heavy use cases and
   simplify user interactions through natural language interfaces.


Sourcing and procurement processes will look similar to today at a base level,
but the touchpoints that require human interaction will be reduced. Policies
will need to be streamlined to account for higher levels of automation and
real-time error/fraud detection that is not possible with manual processes.

Table 1 is a list of capabilities that will be found across the S2P spectrum.
Note that these capabilities may be found in standard packaged solutions, or
enabled via customer/vendor enhancements that integrate via APIs:




TABLE 1: ADVANCED CAPABILITIES AVAILABLE IN SOURCE TO PAY MODULES

Enlarge Table
 * 



Functional ModuleAdvancements
E-Sourcing
 * Automated sourcing event creation based on user requests or sourcing projects
   identified in other procurement, planning or collaboration systems.
 * Requirement creation and enhancement via generative AI.
 * Intelligent suggestions for requirements that may have been overlooked.
 * Intelligent source of supply identification that considers not only which
   suppliers currently offer the product or service, but also which suppliers
   could be developed to help meet company ESG or diversity goals.
 * Automated should-costing for setting reserve pricing and as a basis for
   automated negotiation.
 * Automation of tactical tasks, such as monitoring supplier participation and
   supplier communications.
 * Automation of award scenario-building and analysis based on cost, quality,
   business goals and policies.
 * Automated awarding of business to suppliers and the creation of contracts
   and/or purchase orders to execute the award.
 * Intelligent capturing of sourcing requirements from requestors, and then the
   organization on those requirements into a clear structure suppliers can
   respond to.
 * Supplier-facing capabilities to enable them to quickly respond to a sourcing
   event without having to log into the solution if they would prefer not to.
 * Automate feedback to suppliers based on price points generated by smart
   should cost estimation engines.

Contract Life Cycle Management
 * Automated, risk-based negotiation of contract terms.
 * Real-time, simultaneous internal collaboration with versioning and audit
   control.
 * Automated obligation tracking and KPI measurement
 * Integrated supplier data, sourcing, and invoicing data for contract setup and
   postcontract management.
 * Automated reporting of spend against contracts with task triggers based on
   contract terms.
 * Automated contract delegation based on user requests.
 * Automate contract creation based on awards made in the E-Sourcing solution,
   including pricing, terms and other conditions that have been finalized in the
   sourcing event.
 * Generative AI that automates contract analysis and authoring.

Supplier Information Management
 * Standard supplier onboarding templates that suppliers can respond to with a
   single click if they have already supplied answers to the template in the
   past.
 * Automated data validation across a wide variety of third-party data sources
   and/or marketplaces.
 * Automated document analysis to validate any document submitted by a vendor is
   actually what they claim it is.
 * Automated checks to ensure that suppliers are known and legal to do business
   with, based on government guidance.
 * Integration of performance and risk analysis from public and private data
   sources during the onboarding process.
 * Active project management for pre- and post-onboarding activities.
 * Automated access to supplier data and documents from a common repository that
   suppliers make available to their customer base.

Supplier Performance Management
 * Integration of objective performance measurements with automated population
   and scoring of data from transactional systems.
 * Automated scorecard creation based on supplier type.
 * Integration of external performance management ratings (reputation score)
   from other customers and third-party data sources to automatically general a
   holistic performance rating.
 * Automated creation of postscorecarding improvement plans.
 * Cross-functional alignment across all internal stakeholders on Supplier
   Performance.

Supplier Risk Management
 * Real-time risk alerts for suppliers, locations and commodities.
 * Multitier supplier visibility and entity analysis.
 * Auto risk scoring based on defined thresholds.

Procure to pay
 * Automated best price and supplier compliance checking at the time of
   purchase.
 * Partial autonomous procurement with smart suggestions generated and
   proactively sent to buyers.
 * Simplified chat interface for almost all functionality.
 * Automated account coding for noncatalog spend.
 * Very high levels of touchless invoice processing provided by intelligent
   invoice capture, automated account coding and intelligent matching.
 * Automated identification of fraudulent, duplicate or anomalous invoices that
   should be validated before posting for payment.
 * Delegation of authority workflow governance, including automated purchase
   order approvals.
 * Simplified supplier collaboration on all document types without the need for
   suppliers to log into a portal.
 * Intelligent process analytics and benchmarking that suggest opportunities to
   improve processes and policies.
 * Generative AI assisting users with creation of purchase requests.

Procurement Analytics
 * Prescriptive and predictive analytics that identify spend and policy
   improvement opportunities.
 * Prescriptive analytics that guide sourcing to emerging spend to increase
   spend under contract.
 * Tight integration of opportunity tracking with project execution.
 * Analytic highlights pushed to users, rather than logging into a solution.
 * Near real-time cleansing and enrichment of incoming data, eliminating the
   time lag spend that analytics have historically required.
 * Generative AI-based chat interface to assist users with creating reports and
   dashboards.

Category Management
 * Automatically populate spend data, suppliers, contract data and activities
   into a single dashboard.
 * Intelligent suggestions on actions that can improve cost/quality/policy for a
   category.
 * Integration of risk analysis and suggest actions to take to reduce risk
   profiles.
 * Collaboration tracking and automated support to keep projects on time.
 * Automated information from third-party data sources as input into the
   category strategies.

Intake Management
 * Single channel for all end user requests that will route and track status of
   requests (e.g., a request for a contract will launch a contract request
   questionnaire).
 * Accessible via third-party collaboration tools such as Slack, Teams or email.
 * Ability to respond to policy and process questions.




Source: Gartner (April 2023)



CURRENT STATE

Most organizations have a mixed collection of technology that digitizes the
source-to-pay process, but has limited end-to-end technical integration and is
focused on putting more structure around tasks than automating them or making
them smarter. The goal of optimizing a single functional task, such as sourcing,
was a reasonable goal when initially implemented, but more comprehensive process
automation suffers from that strategy.

Differentiation can be found on a more granular level in the modules themselves.
Functionality in modules such as e-sourcing, e-purchasing and supplier risk
management can vary between suppliers. However, the utilization and
implementation of these software is where some organizations trip up. Even when
implementation goes well, maintaining adoption when the technology adds little
more than moving the process out of email to a centralized server is not enough
to maintain long-term usage. Users want technology that makes their jobs easier,
makes them more effective and saves time. Sadly, most legacy procurement
technology’s main value proposition is to make repeatable tasks quicker to
perform, but they do little to make that task go away, or help with making
better decisions while performing the task.


SILOED APPLICATIONS


The S2P suites are sold to companies as an exhaustive solution that will manage
and automate the full process from sourcing goods and services right through to
the receipt and payment. In a vacuum, these tools have a lot of potential.
However, S2P suites are never implemented into a company without some sort of
preexisting technologies in place, such as ERPs that are usually required to
support various categories of spend. Additionally, while most S2P suites look
tightly integrated in the user interface, they often have a mix of data models
and underlying technologies that can put a limit on the amount of automation and
intelligence that can be directly embedded.

Problems arise when applications are siloed as they inevitably lead people to
operate in the same manner that they used to without the help of an application.
Processes are completed offline and datasets need to be pulled from all
applications in order to collate them. That can then lead to doubt as to the
veracity of data, as customers spend endless time cleaning and formatting data.

This is not to say that all S2P buyers face this issue, but it is a likely
probability if the correct steps aren’t taken during technology selection and
implementation to ensure that crucial systems are integrated and process maps
are clearly laid out.


INCONSISTENT MASTER DATA


Master data should be the source of all truth, information contained in master
data should carry through to all applications. Vendor names, email addresses and
bank details are a simple example of data that should be consistent and accurate
throughout all applications in an ecosystem. Currently, organizations struggle
to push that master data information through to all applications due to
inconsistent data models and poor integrations across applications. As a result,
they have to replicate the records to use them in other applications. This
process is not only inefficient and time consuming, but it can result in errors
in the data and confusion when it comes to updating the records with newly
provided information.

Vendor master data runs across the entire S2P domain, and therefore has a huge
impact on the ability to automate processes, manage suppliers and categories,
and perform simple tasks like paying a supplier. Today’s manual processes do not
move fast enough to keep this critical data fresh.


UI AND JOURNEY


While UI is something that people take for granted at this stage, it is still a
game changer to all users. Some S2P applications are perfectly usable and
intuitive, but it’s still the case that some UI’s are overly complex and require
a large amount of training to use them.


SUPPLIER EXPERIENCE


Suppliers have been plunged into a world where they need to navigate numerous
platforms for numerous customers. Each platform and customer has nuances that
require extra effort and commitment from the supplier’s end, so there is no
wonder why suppliers are pushing back on requests to adopt new platforms.

Suppliers, additionally, are an afterthought in the design of procurement
technology, which leads to suboptimizing their processes to participate. When
suppliers are considered, it can come at the expense of license fees to get
access to more advanced functionality. This leads to poor adoption by the
suppliers, which in turn creates a bigger burden on old manual processes and
increases supplier training costs.


DESCRIPTIVE ANALYTICS


Descriptive analytics are commonplace in S2P suites, however, it is limited in
its ability to support decision making. Descriptive analytics is based on
historical data and can tell you “what has happened.” The last few years have
reminded us that we cannot solely rely on past data to help us dictate what
might happen in the future.


PROCUREMENT STRATEGY IS ALIGNED FOR CONVENIENCE NOT BEST FIT


Often, we see clients consider a S2P vendor because of its current placement in
their business. For example, it might be tempting to expand with an ERP vendor
into the S2P space due to the existing relationship, cost and integration
expectations. However, just because a vendor provides coverage in another area
of the business does not mean it will be the right S2P fit for you. ERP vendor
solutions typically have prebuilt integrations, but often have very different
UIs, data models and supplier collaboration capabilities that eliminate the
“fully integrated” part of the value proposition.


GAP ANALYSIS AND INTERDEPENDENCIES

To move from the current state of fragmented and lightly integrated sourcing and
procurement technology toward a highly integrated, automated source to pay
landscape, organizations must fill these gaps:


STRATEGY

 * ERP-first strategies need to be challenged. S2P is very functionally diverse
   and restricting technology buying policy will restrict the level of success
   that can be obtained.
 * Process silos restrict the natural flow of data and information. These need
   to be torn down with the understanding that interconnected processes offer
   the best path to high levels of automation and transformation.
 * Identify where existing technology simply mirrors what a manual process looks
   like. Technology should be used to drive process improvement, speed and
   intelligence. Getting the organization to identify solutions to limitations
   with existing technology is a great way to expose what a future-state
   landscape will add value.
 * There should be specific business justification for all technology
   deployment. This justification shapes what is deployed and which solutions
   are the best fit. Poorly defined use cases will lead to technology deployed
   for technology’s sake, resulting in at best poor adoption and value, and at
   worst, a rejected funding request.
 * Procurement data will need cleansing, enrichment and normalization. New
   technology will help with this, but starting sooner will speed time to value.
   Service providers and third-party data sources can help jump-start this
   process at a relatively low cost.
 * Document process bottlenecks. Identify where people are manually entering the
   same data across multiple systems, or are entering data provided to them by
   someone else.
 * Identify spend that does not follow the desired workflow. Rogue spend that is
   handled outside the sourcing and procurement infrastructure often highlights
   where process and functional weaknesses reside. Documenting why this spend is
   handled manually will provide a punch-list for capabilities that the new
   solution will need to address to maximize ROI.


MIGRATION PLAN

Based on a gap analysis, we propose the use of the following roadmap and action
items over the next several years as a template to modernizing sourcing and
procurement technology portfolios. While this plan lays out tasks over a
multiyear time frame, organizations that do not require the most cutting-edge
technologies could reduce that time frame. Data and policy improvements often
are the most challenging aspects as they touch areas outside of procurement,
thus leading to more work to get full buy-in and signoff from key stakeholders.
Intelligent technology is also rapidly evolving, so having key use cases and
business outcomes well-defined will help ensure that the correct solution is
procured rather than specific functional technology. Examples of this spend
analytics is rapidly evolving to include category management and risk
management, and the lines between sourcing and contracting are blurring. As
these use cases mature at varying paces, organizations must assess their
viability to make investments where readiness, technology maturity and benefits
align (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: 2023 Sourcing and Procurement Migration Plan








HIGHER PRIORITY

In the next 12 months:
 * Create a list of key business outcomes required from S2P technology that is
   underserved by existing technology. This is the number one task on the list,
   what the reason for the transformation is, and what business problems it will
   solve for the organization. The vision of what a hyperautomated, intelligent
   end state will bring shapes how you will work with key stakeholders, build a
   business plan and dictate the types of technology you will need. You can map
   existing capabilities your existing technology provides versus the
   capabilities listed in the future state section of this research (see
   Infographic: Peer Insights on Procurement Technology Investment Focus and
   Performance).
 * Review the Gartner Sourcing and Procurement Hype Cycle for emerging
   technologies. Technologies newer in their life cycle today are the mainstream
   innovation drivers of tomorrow. Use the  Hype Cycle to identify up and coming
   technologies that address current pain points and start small pilots.
 * Work with existing vendors to understand their advanced technology roadmap.
   Your existing vendors can be the quickest route to get access to advanced
   technology. Actively engage with them on where they are taking their
   technology. If they do not have a plan for using AI, machine learning, RPA,
   APIs and other drivers of next generation technology, plan a long-term exit
   strategy.
 * Map existing critical processes that new technology must support for success.
   Understanding how a process is executed and the data generated and updated
   during the process will identify automation opportunities. Additionally,
   identifying required analytics that support critical business decisions will
   ensure a full visibility of the future state. Use Ignition Guide to Creating
   a Digital Strategy for Procurement to help support this.
 * Create a master data plan if one does not exist, define where data will be
   created and maintained, and where that data will need to be syndicated to.
   Data is the lifeblood of all intelligent systems and analytics. Defining
   where both structured and unstructured data are created and how it is shared
   across systems is key to eliminating ambiguity in what data is correct and
   what it means. 3 Essentials for Starting and Supporting Master Data
   Management is a good starting point (also see Consider Value and Master Data
   Management Maturity When Picking a Tail Spend Solution).
 * Identify the ERP/Financial systems that will feed/receive data in support of
   the S2P technology transformation. Procurement needs to support finance and
   the rest of the supply chain with critical information, so understanding
   where their data is shared allows for creation of standards. Ensuring that
   data such as categorization taxonomies are agreed upon, and meet everyone’s
   needs reduces complexity and manual touchpoints.
 * Review contracts for existing technology to understand financial commitments
   and identify windows of opportunity where legacy technology can be retired.
   Most procurement software is bought on multiyear contracts, so understanding
   when any existing technology would come up for renewal or expire is important
   to building a transition plan. Software that cannot meet future-state goals
   should be managed out with future-state technology taking its place. Having a
   calendar of expiring licenses will allow you to build a replacement or
   extension plan and reduce cash outflows for unused software.
 * Define reporting and analytic outputs that are required to support those key
   business outcomes. Intelligent decision support making is a cornerstone of
   leading procurement organizations. Defining early what analytics are
   required, and how solutions can add suggestions or automate decision making,
   ensures that the right data is collected and combined to support that
   capability.




MEDIUM PRIORITY

In the next 12 to 18 months:
 * Build business cases for each module in the S2P technology stack to identify
   which technologies should be deployed sooner versus later. Big-bang
   implementations are a viable option, but should your budget and resources not
   allow for a full S2P implementation, knowing which functionality is the most
   business critical is useful for developing a rollout plan. Delivering the
   biggest return capabilities first builds strong momentum and organizational
   buy-in for future investments (see The Must-Have Components of Procurement
   Technology Business Cases and Accelerating Procurement’s Digitization —
   Presentation Materials).
 * Identify policies that could be updated given the controls and workflows that
   new technology will enforce. Policies are made to protect the organization
   from breaking laws and reducing overall business risk. However, policies
   currently in place never accounted for what advanced software can do to
   reduce risk, while maintaining organizational controls. Evaluating how small
   policy changes could remove checkpoints and manual reviews is important when
   software can provide those same checks without losing automation (see
   Ignition Guide to Updating Your Procurement Policy).
 * Pilot technologies that can drive immediate incremental automation and
   intelligence across processes. Examples of technology that can supplement
   existing technology would include predictive spend analytics, autonomous
   sourcing and advanced contract analytics (see Top Technology Trends in
   Procurement).
 * Identify key stakeholders inside and outside of procurement that will be
   impacted by the transformation. Procurement impacts almost everyone in the
   organization, but some like finance, logistics and manufacturing are directly
   impacted by how procurement works. Identifying these key groups is critical
   to ensuring everyone is served by future-state technology. Case Study:
   Stakeholder Needs-Centric Storytelling (Umicore) provides an example of how
   to work with and communicate with key stakeholders.
 * Create a list of KPIs that map back to key business outcomes and start
   tracking them. Tracking current processes will highlight where the biggest
   opportunities lie. Having baseline data before the transformation provides
   the proof that the transformation is achieving the expected results (see Hack
   Your Metric and KPI Dashboards by Answering 3 Simple Questions).
 * Monitor how technology usage is evolving in the market. Advanced technologies
   often have an accelerated life cycle, some may quickly show to be a deadend,
   while other newer technologies could arise. Make sure your plan stays updated
   as technologies evolve.




LOWER PRIORITY

In the next 18 to 24 months:
 * Identify skill gaps in their current staff and put together a plan to update
   or acquire people with those skills. Any technology transformation will
   change the types of work that needs to be done. Procurement transformations
   typically move people away from transactional — follow a predefined set of
   rules — to strategic work where critical thinking and data analysis is far
   more important (see Infographic: Which Strategic Skills Matter Most for
   Procurement Outcomes? and Build Staff Business Acumen to Advance
   Procurement’s Strategic Ambitions).
 * Create a list of any policies that require data to be stored in any specific
   country, and any privacy or security requirements you would have. Legal (or
   customer) requirements are often missed, catalog these before procuring any
   new software to make sure after the fact workarounds are not needed.
 * Catalog planned technology projects in adjacent spaces such as finance, HR
   and supply chain to ensure capabilities are not duplicated. Others in your
   organization may be working on transformation projects that overlap into the
   sourcing and procurement space. Collaborating with those other projects early
   will ensure that a problem is not addressed multiple ways, and allows for
   data and support normalization on any shared processes.
 * Build a long-term ownership and support strategy. Technology investments can
   quickly become shelfware without strong leadership. Transformations often
   lose their urgency and momentum once the initial rollout is complete. Define
   exactly who will own the technology and processes, how users will interact
   with that team, and how supplemental and new user training will be executed.
   The hand-off from the implementation team to the long-term support team
   should be well communicated to end users and stakeholders to reduce confusion
   and apathy.


 

© 2023 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a
registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. This publication may
not be reproduced or distributed in any form without Gartner's prior written
permission. It consists of the opinions of Gartner's research organization,
which should not be construed as statements of fact. While the information
contained in this publication has been obtained from sources believed to be
reliable, Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or
adequacy of such information. Although Gartner research may address legal and
financial issues, Gartner does not provide legal or investment advice and its
research should not be construed or used as such. Your access and use of this
publication are governed by Gartner’s Usage Policy. Gartner prides itself on its
reputation for independence and objectivity. Its research is produced
independently by its research organization without input or influence from any
third party. For further information, see "Guiding Principles on Independence
and Objectivity." Gartner research may not be used as input into or for the
training or development of generative artificial intelligence, machine learning,
algorithms, software, or related technologies.

 * About
 * Careers
 * Newsroom
 * Policies
 * Site Index
 * IT Glossary
 * Gartner Blog Network
 * Contact
 * Send Feedback

© 2023 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved.



SWITCHING TO SIMPLIFIED SITE

Your browser version is not supported by Gartner.com. Switching to the
simplified version of the site some features will no longer be available to you,
but overall experience will be improved.

Your browser version is currently supported by Gartner.com. If you change to the
simplified version of the site, some features will no longer be available to
you.


YOUR PRIVACY IS IMPORTANT TO US


By clicking “Accept all,” you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to
enhance site navigation, analyze site usage and assist in our marketing efforts.
To learn more, visit our Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice.

Customize Accept all