www.texasmonthly.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:20::6819:4812  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

POST https://www.texasmonthly.com/wp-json/texas/v1/newsletter/signup/

<form id="tm-today-newsletter-form" action="https://www.texasmonthly.com/wp-json/texas/v1/newsletter/signup/" method="POST" class="form newsletter newsletter--mini article-subscription simple mode-mini" novalidate=""
  data-newsletter-placement="after_content" data-input-prefix="" data-use-recaptcha="1" autocomplete="off">
  <div class="newsletter__fields newsletter__fields--light">
    <input type="hidden" id="g-recaptcha-response" name="g-recaptcha-response">
    <input type="hidden" name="action" value="newsletter_captcha">
    <input type="hidden" name="newsletter_nonce" value="f10fb9ce6b">
    <input type="hidden" name="post_id" value="729385">
    <input type="hidden" name="form_id" value="tm-today-newsletter-form">
    <input type="hidden" name="format" value="json">
    <input type="hidden" name="promo_optin" value="false">
    <div class="newsletter__row newsletter__row--first newsletter__row--light newsletter__row--mini newsletter__input-wrapper">
      <label class="newsletter__label newsletter__label--light" for="email">
        <span class="visually-hidden">Email Address</span>
        <input class="newsletter__input newsletter__input--light newsletter__input--mini" type="email" id="email" placeholder="Email Address" name="email" aria-label="Email Address">
      </label>
      <button type="submit" class="newsletter__submit newsletter__submit--light" aria-label="Submit Email Address">
        <span>Sign Up</span>
        <div class="loader"></div>
      </button>
    </div>
    <div id="newsletterMessage" class="newsletter__message newsletter__message--light " aria-live="polite">
    </div>
    <ul class="newsletter__lists newsletter__lists--mini">
      <li><input type="checkbox" name="editorial[]" id="cs-editorial-TMtoday(Daily)" value="TMtoday(Daily)" checked="" data-list="editorial"></li>
    </ul>
    <div class="newsletter__std-links">
      <p>
        <a href="/newsletters">See All Newsletters</a>
      </p>
      <p>
        <a href="https://www.texasmonthly.com/about/privacy-policy/">Privacy Policy</a>
      </p>
    </div>
    <div class="newsletter__instructions"> If you fill out the first name, last name, or agree to terms fields, you will NOT be added to the newsletter list. Leave them blank to get signed up. </div>
    <div class="newsletter__row newsletter__row--name">
      <label for="first-name">First Name</label>
      <input autocomplete="nope" class="newsletter__input--name" type="text" id="first-name" placeholder="John" name="first_name">
    </div>
    <div class="newsletter__row newsletter__row--name">
      <label for="last-name">Last Name</label>
      <input autocomplete="nope" class="newsletter__input--name" type="text" id="last-name" placeholder="Doe" name="last_name">
    </div>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

Close
Log in
Search Texas Monthly...

Sections


NEWS & POLITICS

 * Business
 * Health
 * Energy
 * Politics & Policy
 * Best and Worst Legislators
 * Bum Steers


ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT

 * Sports
 * Books
 * Music
 * Film & TV
 * Style & Design
 * Art


BEING TEXAN

 * Texas History
 * The Texanist
 * Best Thing In Texas
 * Country Notes


TRAVEL & OUTDOORS

 * Hunting & Fishing
 * Parks & Recs
 * Where To Stay Now
 * Critters


FOOD & DRINK

 * Libations
 * Recipes
 * Pat’s Pick
 * Dining Guide
 * Tacos
 * Tex-Mexplainer


BBQ

 * Recipes
 * Joint Reviews
 * TM BBQ Club
 * Top 50 Joints
 * TM BBQ Fest


PODCASTS

 * America's Girls
 * State of Mind
 * One by Willie
 * Tom Brown’s Body
 * Boomtown
 * Underdog


VIDEO


MAGAZINE


LONG READS

 * True Crime

 * Subscribe
 * Newsletters
 * Join TM BBQ Club
 * TM BBQ Fest
 * Manage Subscription
 * Renew
 * Give a Gift
 * Back Issues
 * Buy Merch

 * About Us
 * The Stand Up Desk
 * Careers
 * Advertise
 * Texas Monthly Studio
 * Promotions

Close Search

Search
Sort By

Filter By
Locations
Type
View Results

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Filters



Texas Monthly
 * Subscribe
   
 * Log in
 * My Account
 * 

 * 

 * My Profile
 * Manage Subscription
 * Verify My Subscription
 * Log out

 * News & Politics
 * Arts & Entertainment
 * Being Texan
 * Food & Drink
 * BBQ
 * Travel & Outdoors
 * Magazine
 * Podcasts
 * Video

Politics & Policy


WHO IS GREG ABBOTT?

After a quarter century in statewide office, Texas’s most popular politician
remains an enigma—even to the folks who keep electing him. But the truth about
the governor is hiding in plain sight.


By Mimi Swartz
May 2022 12

Illustration by Joan Wong; Abbott: Jeff Wilson

In the early seventies, when he was a lanky, long-haired teenager, Greg Abbott
was a runner. He was a member of the high school track team in Duncanville,
about eleven miles southwest of downtown Dallas, and he was determined to be a
winner. As he would do so many times as he moved forward in life, he set a goal
and had a plan to achieve it.

Early in his freshman year, after his family had moved to town from East Texas,
Abbott sought out an accomplished high school runner, Keith Bibb. Abbott
introduced himself and asked Bibb, who was two years older, to be his running
partner. “We ran every single day for a solid year together,” said Bibb, who
still considers Abbott a friend. “We would put in right at about four and a half
miles to five miles each day.” There were several routes they could take, but
Abbott usually got a mile in first, by jogging from his modest ranch house on
Cherry Street to Bibb’s, on Oriole. Then they’d run through quiet residential
streets, along the green edge of Lakeside Park, and past Duncanville High’s
sun-washed parking lot, their feet slapping the asphalt, their thighs pumping,
their lungs burning. “Greg and I ran in all kinds of weather, every holiday,”
Bibb said. “He would be at my front door, saying, ‘Okay, you ready to go?’ It
would be freezing cold, raining—it didn’t matter. I mean, he was steadfast.”

Duncanville was then a quiet town of about 14,000, the kind of place where no
one locked their doors. Even as newcomers from Longview, two hours east, the
Abbotts easily fit in. Like many of their neighbors, they were raising their
boys, Greg and his older brother, Gary, on a steady diet of Boy Scouts, church,
and sports—the rites and rituals that taught white, middle-class Texas boys how
to take their place in the world. But Gary and Greg had to grow up faster than
most.


POPULAR VIDEOS

Previous Next
watch



When Greg was sixteen, his father, Calvin, died suddenly of a heart attack. To
pay the bills, his mother, Doris, went to work for a real estate firm,
eventually becoming an agent. To help out, Greg took odd jobs: stocking
groceries, mowing lawns, hauling steel in a nearby factory, yes-ma’aming and
no-sirring his way from sunup to sundown. Busy as he was, he kept on running
with Bibb. “My junior and senior year I would wake up in the middle of the
night, and something would be bothering me. I would run three or four miles, and
it would calm me down,” Bibb recalled. “Greg did that too.” Abbott later
reflected that running and racing—pushing himself to his limits—helped him build
his ability to see things through. “The challenge of running, and the physical
exertion,” he writes in his 2016 memoir Broken but Unbowed, “always gave me a
renewed vigor.”



After he stopped running competitively, Abbott continued to test himself in new
ways. His relentlessness served him well, right into young adulthood, when, at
age 26, he graduated from Vanderbilt Law School and landed a job at a
prestigious firm in Houston. Then, on a muggy July afternoon in 1984, while he
was running in a wealthy neighborhood shaded by massive oaks, one of the trees
split from its base and fell on him. It crushed his spine, leaving Abbott
paralyzed from the waist down. 

Bibb, who visited his friend in the hospital, was astounded by Abbott’s
optimism. “I’ve told people that know me best that if I lost the ability to run,
I think I would die inside, I really would,” Bibb said. “But Greg didn’t do
that. He just turned down another road.”

It was that other road that took Abbott to McAllen, in the Rio Grande Valley, on
January 8 of this year, speaking to a strategically chosen audience at the
Hispanic Leadership Summit. On a stage adorned with a phalanx of U.S. and Texas
flags, he declared his candidacy for a third term as governor. The familiar
figure in the wheelchair—a handsome, silver-haired, square-jawed man of 64 with
narrow eyes, crinkly crow’s-feet, and a mouth that settled more readily into a
frown than a smile—spoke his carefully prepared remarks in a comforting accent,
pronouncing the state “Tex-is,” giving the word a lyrical bounce every time he
said it. He presented himself as a righteous defender of the state’s traditions,
a man unbending amid the shifting winds of political fashion.

In reality, though, Abbott’s road had led him a long way from his political
beginnings in the nineties, when he presented himself as a moderate Bush-era
Republican. Now his rhetoric, if not his delivery, bore more resemblance to that
of Donald Trump. “We cannot let big government liberals redesign our state with
the progressive agenda that is destroying some parts of America,” Abbott warned.
The destroyers, he said, included “radical liberals making calls to defund the
police,” the “leftist promoters of the Green New Deal,” an unnamed but nebulous
government cabal that was preventing parents from being “decision-makers over
their children’s education and health care,” and advocates of “a woke radical
agenda” that might remove the tax-exempt status of churches and destroy freedom
of religion. Guns? “I signed more than twenty laws to protect your Second
Amendment rights,” Abbott told the crowd. 

At the time he delivered his speech, Abbott was facing two noisy Republican
primary opponents, Don Huffines and Allen West. Though they never threatened him
in the polls, he took them seriously enough to adopt some of their farther-right
positions on issues including COVID-19 vaccine mandates and border policy. Soon
enough, he would trounce both candidates in the March 1 primary, with help from
the tens of millions he had already raised in campaign cash. Now he faces a
Democratic nominee for governor who alienated many Texans by vowing, during a
misbegotten run for president, to seize semiautomatic firearms. Most polls have
Abbott leading Beto O’Rourke by margins of 5 to 15 percent. It doesn’t seem to
matter that Abbott, the former white-shoe lawyer, has metamorphosed into a
right-wing standard bearer. He is doing what he’s always done. He’s running for
the win.  


Abbott taking the baton in a high school relay race. Courtesy of the Texans for
Greg Abbott Campaign

Greg Abbott’s 1974–1975 yearbook photo from Duncanville High School. Courtesy of
the Texans for Greg Abbott Campaign
Left: Abbott taking the baton in a high school relay race. Courtesy of the
Texans for Greg Abbott Campaign
Top: Greg Abbott’s 1974–1975 yearbook photo from Duncanville High School.
Courtesy of the Texans for Greg Abbott Campaign



Say what you will about the politics of George W. Bush, Rick Perry, or Ann
Richards, but each of Abbott’s predecessors had a gift for connection, as well
as a certain consistency of belief and a few specific goals by which they hoped
to better the state. Abbott, by contrast, has always been something of a cipher.
He has seldom seemed to want to accomplish anything specific as governor. By and
large, he’s concentrated instead on what he’s against: the “radical liberal”
agenda. He has focused most of all simply on being governor, devoting his
energies to doing whatever is necessary to stay in office. 

Much of the talk about Abbott over the past few years—among old friends, current
and former supporters, pundits, and GOP moderates—has revolved around the
political shifts he’s made since he became governor in 2015, transitioning from
a somewhat patrician Republican to an eager, far-right competitor to Florida
governor Ron DeSantis in the race to inherit the Trump mantle. The old Abbott
garnered support from many Democrats when he ran for state Supreme Court back in
the nineties. The Abbott of today has essentially outlawed abortion while
instituting some of the most draconian voting restrictions in the country and
dispatching thousands of National Guard troops to the border. “I’ve talked to
any number of Texas businesspeople who have supported Abbott in the past, and
they have no clue what he’s become,” said Matthew Dowd, the chief strategist for
the 2004 Bush-Cheney campaign, who briefly campaigned for lieutenant governor as
a Democrat last year before dropping out of the race. “He’s not the guy they
supported or wanted.”  

Some who know Abbott describe him as a chameleon who changes his positions—on
everything from COVID restrictions to animal-welfare protections—to fit the
politics of the moment. Others see a governor who has managed to survive as
something of a closet moderate while surrounded by ever more far-right
legislators, answerable to a Republican primary electorate that skews in the
same direction. “I think Greg is ambitious, and I want my governor to be
ambitious,” said John T. Montford, a former conservative Democratic state
senator and an Abbott loyalist. “In his heart I think he’s a good man.”  

There is a public Abbott and a private Abbott. Friends describe a man with a sly
wit and a steely intellect. He’s known for making light of his disability in a
way that puts others at ease. “I remember having a big party at my house in
Houston,” said Lana Shadwick, a former assistant Harris County attorney. “It
wasn’t handicap-equipped. He just went over the step that was there and just
maneuvered into this tight entryway. He always had this smile on his face, like
Tom Cruise in Risky Business.”

> With his reelection considered highly likely, politicos are wondering what new
> challenge will animate the governor. If Donald Trump doesn’t seek the
> presidency in 2024, will Abbott pursue it?

On one thing everyone agrees: Abbott is a fund-raising wizard. If governing is
Abbott’s job, raising money is his passion. While most pols find trawling for
donations to be a chore, Abbott delights in it. And he does it surpassingly
well, building the kind of war chests that stop serious challengers before they
even start. Referring to Abbott’s disability, an Austin politico observed, “When
you have to eliminate a bunch of things from your life because you just can’t do
them anymore, the things you do you are going to g—damned do them well. Practice
makes perfect. He’s smooth. He’s congenial. But he’s a tough guy underneath,
make no mistake about it.” Abbott is so tough, in fact, that many close to the
governor refused to talk about him on or off the record, for fear of
reprisals—the not-so-accidental death of a legislator’s beloved bill, for
example, or the denial of a contributor’s coveted appointment to a state
commission. (Abbott never responded to interview requests for this story.) 

The Texan public gets a different Greg Abbott: a man who delivers wooden
speeches in front of supportive audiences or alone, from behind a desk in his
private studio. In times of crisis, he sports military-style garb—khaki shirts
and navy blue windbreakers with various official seals—like an actor playing a
governor. He’s never been a happy-to-see-ya backslapper like Bush or Perry. And
a scene of Abbott gleefully sparring with the press in the style of Trump or
DeSantis is almost impossible to envision. The governor grants interviews to
only a handful of friendly journalists, most of them news anchors from local TV
stations. Family? You won’t find many warmhearted photos of Abbott with his
brother, Gary, who exhorts readers of his blog to prepare for the return of the
son of God. “Jesus is coming back! Are you ready?” 



Unlike Gary, Greg seems preternaturally averse to any big reveal. His memoir is
about as enlightening as a dishwasher instruction manual. He devotes three
chapters to his accident and legal career (“I became one of the youngest lawyers
to be elected as a judge in Texas history”; “I became the longest serving
attorney general in Texas history”) and then swiftly moves on to explain, for
nearly two hundred pages, how the Obama administration desecrated the U.S.
Constitution and how he fought back. He offers shout-outs to his wife, his
mother, and his daughter for their unflagging devotion, but other than thanking
a handful of best political pals in the acknowledgments—Senator Ted Cruz among
them—Abbott stops short of sharing much personal history. 

With his reelection considered highly likely, politicos are wondering what new
challenge will animate the governor. If Trump doesn’t seek the presidency in
2024, will Abbott pursue it? If Trump does run and win, might Abbott angle for a
Cabinet post? Either way, the Texas governor will be a player in the national
conversation, with more and more folks wondering: Who is Greg Abbott, and what’s
his vision for America?

“I’ve always thought of him as a guy who is in public service not to do anything
but to show how far he can go,” said a former Republican officeholder who worked
with Abbott. “He’s always trying to push further, but for no real reason other
than to show everybody what he can do. How far he can go.” 

Abbott’s life has long been viewed with his injury as the focal point, which
makes his story an indisputable one of triumph over tragedy. But the way Abbott
would chart his path after the accident had everything to do with the life he
had lived before, in a Texas very different from the complex, diverse, modern
state he currently governs.

The old Texas defined Abbott’s early life. It was a place controlled almost
entirely by white Christian men; the racial and cultural power shifts to come
were barely perceptible, if at all, when he was born, in 1957. His father,
Calvin, was a dark-haired, nattily dressed insurance agent, a graduate of the
University of Texas at Austin whose own father, A. G. Abbott, was a pastor in
Electra, near Greg’s birthplace in Wichita Falls. Calvin’s wife, Doris, was a
homemaker who had attended Hardin College prior to marrying. The couple’s
wedding announcement appeared as a news story in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram in
1949, containing the kind of breathless reporting reserved for those of some
means or social standing. The bride wore “a navy-blue dress of Italian wool with
a V neckline and full skirt, with navy opera pumps and bag, a gray velvet
picture hat with a wreath of ostrich feathers around the brim, and gray gloves.”
The refreshment table, the story continued, “was laid with white satin,
overdressed with a Normandy lace cloth made by the bride’s grandmother.” 

If the Abbotts weren’t wealthy, they were sturdily middle class. Politically,
they were hard-line conservatives, supporting the 1964 presidential campaign of
Arizona senator Barry Goldwater, who championed states’ rights and opposed the
Civil Rights Act. The Abbotts were churchgoing Christians who believed in
independence, self-reliance, and keeping the government out of your business. 

When Abbott’s mother died, in 2002, he issued a statement crediting her for
“instilling in me the drive and determination to deal with the obstacles I had
to face in life.” Indeed, Doris was a crucial role model for her son, determined
to keep her life and that of her family on an upward trajectory. After the
Abbotts moved to Duncanville, she met with the high school’s track coach, trying
to ensure that Greg “got in with a solid group of people,” recalled his friend
Bibb. 

That solid group populated a world that was representative of the Texas that
many conservatives recall with nostalgia today. Duncanville in the sixties and
seventies was shifting from a small town into a growing exurb where white
families fled to escape the desegregation of schools and neighborhoods in
Dallas. A reunion photo of Abbott’s 1976 high school graduating class consists
almost entirely of white faces. Duncanville wasn’t a place to learn about the
larger world; it was a place to take comfort in the status quo. 

In Broken but Unbowed, Abbott writes about the death of his father almost as a
footnote. Details are scant. What grief he suffered is papered over with the
character-building aspects of the family’s recovery. (In those days, boys,
especially Texas boys, didn’t cry.) The experience would have been, for Abbott,
an early lesson that life could change in an instant, and you’d better be ready
to pick up the pieces and move on. 

Abbott was not going to be deterred by loss; if anything, it spurred him on. “I
was the student who received the letter sweater for history,” he recalls in his
book, adding drolly, “An academic letter sweater is not exactly the kind of
thing a teen wears around the neighborhood. It never left my closet.” High
school friends recall Abbott as an excellent and driven student. As a colleague,
former state Supreme Court chief justice Tom Phillips, would later remark in a
tribute, Abbott was “all everything, including president of the National Honor
Society and a two-sport letterman.” Abbott might not have been the most gifted
runner on the track team, but he kept at that too. “I would say he was an
average athlete but someone that was very determined to be as good as he could
possibly be,” his track coach, Lynn Dobbins, told me. Bibb put it another way:
Abbott “had a drive and hunger to be the best at anything that he tried.”  

As a student at UT-Austin, Abbott certainly looked like a winner: rangy,
muscular, and twinkly-eyed, with a strong jawline and fashionably shaggy hair.
He graduated in 1981 with a degree in finance. A scholarship from the
Duncanville Police Department had helped to see him through, but he’d also
worked as a busboy, a waiter, and even a disco DJ to make ends meet. Abbott
networked, too, joining both the Young Republicans Club and the Delta Tau Delta
fraternity. 

In 1978 Abbott fell in love with a fellow student, Cecilia Phalen, a delicately
pretty young woman from San Antonio who was of Irish and Mexican descent. Both
lived in the then-tony Castilian dorm, where Cecilia practiced piano in the
lobby. They courted for three years and married the same year Abbott graduated.
He had decided to go to law school. After he was turned down by UT, he and his
new bride packed up and headed for Texas Tech, but soon enough Abbott had
transferred to the higher-ranked law school at Vanderbilt, in Nashville. 

One of his new friends there was Mark Phariss, from Lawton, Oklahoma, just fifty
miles from Abbott’s birthplace of Wichita Falls. The two differed
politically—Phariss was more liberal—and would debate politics over Friday night
drinks. “We didn’t agree on a lot, but we always enjoyed the banter,” Phariss
told me. “I always thought he was rational and reasonable. He was outgoing,
gregarious, always had a smile—all in all a genuinely nice guy.” 

During his final year of law school, Abbott secured a job with Butler & Binion,
one of the more prestigious and politically connected law firms in Houston.
“This position was exactly what Cecilia and I were aiming for as a young couple.
The future we had dreamed of was on the brink of becoming a reality,” Abbott
writes in Broken but Unbowed. He doesn’t define that dream in the book, but by
then he had told Phariss that he intended to be governor of Texas one day.

Butler & Binion provided entrée into the local and state power structures. Its
lawyers represented some oil and construction companies, along with other major
local organizations, such as the hospitals in the Texas Medical Center—which
meant plenty of introductions to future political donors. In his memoir, Abbott
mentions a formal dinner in the summer of 1984 at the Houston Country Club: “I
remember dancing with Cecilia, smiling and marveling at how wonderfully this new
chapter of life was unfolding.” 

The next hurdle he had to clear was the bar exam. On July 14, a hot, breezy
Saturday, Abbott suggested to his study partner that they go for a run. As
always, he hoped the exercise would help him relax and focus. The pair took a
scenic route, from the Abbotts’ modest apartment near Allen Parkway through the
posh environs of River Oaks.

At one point during their run, the sidewalk narrowed, and Abbott pulled ahead of
his partner. Suddenly, he heard a crack that sounded as if “a bomb had exploded
about ten feet away.” A seventy-five-foot oak with a trunk about three feet in
diameter snapped near its base and began to fall. Abbott didn’t have time to
jump forward or backward. The next thing he knew, he was lying on the ground,
still conscious but in terrible pain. He couldn’t breathe, and he couldn’t feel
his legs. 

In the hospital, a doctor told him he would never walk again. “A life once
filled with confidence was now suddenly riddled with self-doubt,” Abbott writes.
He worried about whether he would be able to work. He worried that he wouldn’t
be able to take care of himself, his wife, and the children they hoped to have.
But soon he rallied in a way many could not. Abbott underwent excruciating
surgeries and rehabilitation with the same determination his friends had seen
him exhibit while racing for the finish line in high school track meets. “In one
sense, my world was forever changed in an instant,” Abbott writes. “But I came
to realize that I hadn’t changed. And, I began to think, my dreams didn’t have
to change either.” 

One of the higher-ups at Butler & Binion was a canny litigator named Pearson
Grimes. (Disclosure: I worked as a paralegal at Butler & Binion from 1976 to
1979, before Abbott arrived.) Grimes persuaded Don Riddle, who was then
considered one of the best personal injury lawyers in Houston, to represent his
young associate in a potential lawsuit. Abbott had been hurt during the heyday
of the plaintiffs’ bar in Texas, with wily lawyers regularly winning jury awards
and settlements in the seven figures for injured clients. Riddle knew, however,
that a tree falling did not necessarily indicate negligence on someone’s
part—and negligence had to be shown in order to recover damages. But Abbott made
for a sympathetic plaintiff, struck down just as his professional life was
beginning. And the owner of the property where the accident occurred was a
wealthy divorce lawyer, Roy W. Moore. (He died in 2018.) According to one person
who heard the story from Moore, he visited Abbott in the hospital and promised
that he would insist that his insurance carrier pay Abbott the highest amount
the policy would allow, negligence or no negligence. 



Moore was covered for $1 million or so in his homeowners policy, Riddle
recalled. “A million dollars didn’t stretch that far if you were damaged for
life,” he said. But he discovered that Moore had paid a tree company that was
part of a large national chain to do some work on the oak. Riddle could then
assert that the repairs might have been done improperly—that more attention had
been paid to caring for the tree’s canopy than to protecting and stabilizing the
roots. Now Riddle had not one but two deep-pocketed defendants. Through what was
then known as joint and several liability, a plaintiff could recover damages
from multiple parties so long as some responsibility was established. 

By 1986, Abbott had completed his rehab. He wasn’t walking, but he was moving
forward in other ways. Riddle had negotiated an impressive settlement that would
support his client for the rest of his life. The estimated total of $3 million
(about $8 million today) began with an initial lump-sum payment of $300,000
(about $770,000 in today’s dollars), followed by another lump sum of $100,000 in
1989. Abbott would continue to get lump-sum payments every three years, with the
last payment of $740,020 scheduled for November 1, 2022—a nice supplement to his
$153,750 annual governor’s salary. Additionally, in 1986 Abbott started
receiving $5,000 a month (almost $13,000 today) with a built-in annual increase
of 4 percent for the remainder of his lifetime. It was all tax-free. 

As Abbott has often said, he would trade any sum for the chance to walk again.
Still, his payout was not only unexpectedly generous but also instructive:
Abbott had seen how the levers of power could be made to operate on his behalf. 

If he was angry or frustrated by his circumstances, he never showed it in
public. Instead, Abbott was intent on proving his worth to Butler & Binion to
display his gratitude. At first, as he later recalled, “the work I was doing at
the law firm probably wasn’t bringing in any revenue.” But he made himself
valuable in less tangible ways. “When other lawyers arrived in the morning, I
was already there,” he writes. “If they wanted to go home early, they’d have to
walk past me—the guy in the body cast recently discharged from the hospital.
When they considered calling in sick, they pictured me wheeling myself into the
office. Slow and steady wins the race, as the saying goes, for turtles and
attorneys.”

Over the next six years, Abbott became known as a mentor to young lawyers and a
steady hand for clients such as Metro, the City of Houston’s bus company. He
defended Metro in cases involving traffic accidents and personal injuries.

Some who suffer hardship or loss become more empathetic. Others believe that if
they can overcome personal tragedy, those who suffer similar fates should be
able to do the same. Abbott seemed to fall into the latter category. Certainly,
he had no qualms about representing the powerful against the disadvantaged. In
Broken but Unbowed, he displays little sympathy for plaintiffs in
personal-injury lawsuits. (And he never mentions his own settlement.) He also
discovered that his disability could give him an edge defending clients in such
cases. “It was during those early years in my career that I realized a few
unique advantages of practicing law in a wheelchair,” he writes. It was easier
to connect with jurors, he found, because he wasn’t standing above them but
meeting them at eye level. When one plaintiff appeared at trial with a cane,
asserting that he couldn’t work because of his injury, Abbott wheeled up in
front of the jury and successfully shot down the man’s claim. “Another win,” he
writes. “I was on my way.”  

> Even before he was sworn in as district judge, Abbott had begun advising his
> new colleagues on how they should make rulings.“He was mansplaining,” one
> recalled.

Where he was headed was clear: being a successful lawyer, yes, but also a
successful member of the establishment. Abbott was considered a charming
companion at dinner parties among the wealthy and prominent in Houston. He
hosted Christmas fetes for the firm at his home in the comfortable Tanglewood
area, where he enjoyed a custom-built pool with a ramp that allowed him to enter
via his wheelchair. 

“The accident taught me how strong you can be when you have to,” Abbott would
later tell the Houston Chronicle. “The doctors told me I was never going to walk
again, so I focused on how good I could be without walking. My life has been
better since the accident than before. It’s given me a much greater appreciation
of life.” 

District judge Abbott posing with his mother, Doris.Courtesy of the Texans for
Greg Abbott Campaign

There is some debate about whether Abbott was on the partner track at Butler &
Binion in the early nineties, as he approached the eight-year point at which
lawyers generally move up or out. The portents weren’t all positive. By his own
admission, Abbott wasn’t a flashy practitioner or a rainmaker who brought in
lucrative new clients. Still, when well-liked attorneys weren’t going to make
partner, Butler & Binion would often help them find work as in-house counsel for
a client or help organize a campaign for a judgeship—the better to extend the
firm’s influence. 

Whatever the reason, Abbott announced a bid for district judge in 1991, seeking
to preside over cases in the Harris County civil courts. He attacked the
campaign with typical relentlessness, personally calling on anyone and everyone
who might help him. At the time, Abbott struck prospective supporters—Democrats
as well as Republicans—as a solid, thoughtful, fair-minded Republican in the
mold of then-president George H. W. Bush, who was deeply popular in his adopted
hometown of Houston. 

Even so, victory was not assured for the political novice. A GOP contender for a
different judgeship at the time remembers going to Abbott headquarters on
election night, after her own victory seemed assured, and finding the candidate
sitting alone, devastated. “The rest of us had won, and he was losing,” she
recalled. “It’s the only time I’ve ever seen Greg Abbott look defeated.” But
when the late ballots came in, Abbott pulled out a victory “by the skin of his
teeth,” as she put it. “From that moment on, he was unstoppable.”

On the bench, Abbott became known as a measured, well-prepared jurist who
continued his tradition of making his colleagues look like shirkers. “He worked
all the time,” said Lana Shadwick. “I would be there on a Friday night, and he
would have his specially equipped Cadillac parked on the corner of the street.
At ten o’clock on a Friday night.”

He also began to display a sense of entitlement that might not have stood out
among  other preening lawyers at big defense firms. Even before he was sworn in,
Abbott had begun advising his new colleagues on how they should make rulings.
“He was mansplaining,” one of the female judges recalled. While still new to the
job, Abbott appropriated the chairs from the jury box of an unsuspecting judge
because he liked them better than the ones in his own courtroom. Abbott, the
judge said, “had been there a week or ten days.” 

Circumstances well beyond the Harris County courthouse would help Abbott muscle
ahead of his peers. George W. Bush defeated incumbent governor Ann Richards in
1994, and the dominance of Texas Republicans in the state’s political life began
apace. The job of identifying candidates to fill judicial openings fell to
Bush’s consigliere, Karl Rove. When a vacancy on the state Supreme Court arose,
Rove told me, he noted the absence of justices from Houston. And Abbott had been
voted Trial Judge of the Year by the Texas Association of Civil Trial and
Appellate Specialists. “He’s young, he’s Republican, and he’s in a wheelchair,”
Rove told Bush. “Isn’t that interesting?”

“Get him up here!” Bush replied. Soon after Abbott arrived at the governor’s
office, Bush asked a characteristically blunt question: “What’s it like to be in
a wheelchair?” Abbott responded with a well-prepared answer, one free of
self-pity and radiating the kind of optimism that would connect immediately with
Bush: “I’ve got a great wife, a beautiful daughter. I enjoy being a judge and I
love the law, and the only thing I miss is I’m not able to play golf or go for a
run.”

Rove told me, “I knew when he finished, he was the guy Bush was looking for.”
So, after serving as a district court judge for just three years, Abbott found
himself on the Texas Supreme Court in 1996. He would stay there until 2001,
hewing mostly to Bush-style conservatism. Abbott pleased environmentalists by
voting to uphold the constitutionality of the Edwards Aquifer Act and Austin’s
water pollution control ordinance. Most notably, however, he became a judicial
champion for Bush’s war on “frivolous lawsuits.” 

Under the banner of tort reform, Bush and other Republicans were painting
themselves as defenders of small businesses, saving them from the ruination of
huge judgments that might result from someone, say, tripping on the front steps
of a hardware store. Most of the financial support for the elimination of
consumer protections, though, came not from shopkeepers but from large
homebuilders, hospitals, and insurance companies. Further, the biggest opponents
to the Bush policies were plaintiff’s lawyers, who also happened to be among the
Democratic party’s most generous backers. 

“This was a court that decided it would dismantle tort law,” one medical
malpractice lawyer told me. “And Abbott went along with it.” Sometimes he did
more than that. In one prominent case, a Texas woman sought to sue the Kirby
vacuum-cleaner company for damages after she was brutally raped in her home by a
contractor working as a salesman for the firm. Six justices agreed that the
victim should be able to file suit against Kirby, but Abbott dissented with two
others. 

> “He’s young, he’s Republican, and he’s in a wheelchair,” Karl Rove told
> then-governor George W. Bush. “Isn’t that interesting?”

“There is a seething anger in him that reveals itself in really hateful ways
against the weakest people,” said a former Democratic state legislator who
tangled with Abbott. Some plaintiff’s attorneys have a simpler way of
describing  Abbott’s rulings: hypocrisy salted with expediency. After the
accident that paralyzed him, Abbott had hired an attorney to win him a big
settlement. But now he was helping to prevent others from receiving the same
type of compensation for their misfortune. 

“No evidence of any kind was ever established that somebody did something to
cause that tree falling, other than wind and rain,” said a Houston attorney who
frequently discussed the case with Don Riddle. (Some of the case file was purged
as part of a routine courthouse cleaning, a fact that one plaintiff’s lawyer
described as “convenient.”)

Judges typically keep low profiles and take care to avoid any appearance of
partisanship. Abbott took a different approach. “You have a governor who makes
his agenda tort reform and then appoints Abbott to the Supreme Court,” said one
longtime plaintiff’s lawyer. “If you want to go anyplace, you’d better be the
judicial tort reformer. And he did it. When he saw what he could do on a
political issue with his activism, he could use that to go somewhere else.” 

Politics was never far from Abbott’s mind. He sent out a newsletter to keep
supporters abreast of his accomplishments. When the high court held out-of-town
hearings, Abbott scheduled meetings with current and potential supporters in
each locality. In a speech to honor Abbott upon his departure in 2001, former
chief justice Tom Phillips recalled that Abbott appeared on the front page of
the Lubbock newspaper, with the caption “Justice Abbott will hear three
arguments today, assisted by other members of the Supreme Court.” Phillips
affectionately described how “Greg played a special though unofficial role as
the court’s envoy to the public.” Like a socialite who can’t resist appearing at
every luxury store opening, Abbott became ubiquitous as a speaker before civic
groups and school assemblies, turning himself into a Republican party stalwart. 

A fellow jurist recalled how Abbott took an uncommon joy in fund-raising; it
energized him, in contrast to most judges, who find that aspect of the job
distasteful, not to mention an ethical gray area. Around this time, he warned a
potential state Supreme Court candidate to turn down campaign contributions from
plaintiffs’ lawyers because it could be a career-killer. (In Texas, where judges
are elected, most take contributions from all comers as a sign of their
nonpartisan approach to the law.) Abbott also used judicial fund-raising to
build a political base, extending his circle of supporters to the likes of
Texans for Lawsuit Reform, a collection of homebuilders, insurers, physicians,
retailers, and others determined to break the power of the plaintiffs’ bar. “He
was just very ambitious,” said a fellow jurist. “As a judge, you knew he was
interested in higher office—at least governor, if not senator or president.” 

Illustration by Joan Wong; Abbott: Jeff Wilson; Young Abbott: Courtesy of the
Texans for Greg Abbott Campaign

Those lofty ambitions became even more evident after Abbott was elected attorney
general in 2002, serving as what’s been called “managing partner of the largest
law firm in Texas.” Abbott’s campaign against plaintiff’s lawyer Kirk Watson, a
Democrat who would go on to rankle Abbott as a state senator, had proved that
his political instincts and fund-raising acumen were paying off. Twenty-six
percent of the funds Abbott raised for his campaign came from powerful groups
such as Texans for Lawsuit Reform and the Texas Association of Business;
combined, they and others gave Abbott nearly $8 million, outpacing Watson’s
$5.4 million. The fund-raising edge helped Abbott defeat Watson handily, by a
margin of 57 percent to 41 percent. 

In the beginning of his term, Abbott seemed relatively indifferent to the
political winds, frequently exhorting his staff to “do what’s right.” Several of
those who worked for Abbott recall the attorney general’s office as a congenial
place where the boss listened to arguments from all sides before making a
decision. Abbott, they said, welcomed pushback. “We were very serious that you
only have four years to achieve something,” a former member of Abbott’s team
recalled. “There was purpose.” The office instituted programs to collect more
child support from errant fathers, combat domestic abuse, and enforce consumer
protections under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Abbott was even willing to
cross the secrecy-prone Rick Perry. In 2003 he ruled that the governor’s office
couldn’t withhold certain documents related to the state budget, which did not
endear him to the governor. (“Why are we trying to cover Perry’s ass?” one
staffer remembered asking at the time.)

During those years, Abbott’s idea of protecting the border aligned with that of
his Republican predecessors. His office defended the rights of immigrants, who,
after all, gave Texas businesses a steady supply of cheap labor. Allying with a
network of immigration attorneys and Catholic charities, Abbott’s staff worked
to protect the undocumented against fake immigration lawyers who promised help
with citizenship. “Hispanic consumers must know that the doors of our justice
system are open to everyone, regardless of where you may live, regardless of
where you may be born, regardless of what language you speak or what your last
name is,” Abbott declared at a 2005 forum. Immigration enforcement, he said, was
“not Texas’s job.”



During the 2007 Legislature, Abbott opposed the anti-immigrant agenda promoted
by some GOP lawmakers. They wanted to tax money transfers that immigrants sent
to their families in Latin America and sought to sue the federal government to
compensate Texas for its spending on border security. The most extreme group
also wanted to deny citizenship to Texas-born children of immigrants. Abbott
told lawmakers that many of the measures were unconstitutional. None of them
passed the Legislature. 

But those who now claim that Abbott was a moderate Republican during his time as
attorney general have not looked very deeply at some of his appointments or
accomplishments. It was Abbott who plucked Ted Cruz from relative obscurity to
be solicitor general, the state’s chief litigator, in 2003. Abbott was also an
enthusiastic investigator of alleged voter fraud. In 2006 his office established
a $1.5 million “Special Investigations Unit” to hunt down players in what Abbott
called “epidemic” voter fraud. Abbott’s investigators found almost nothing, but
not for lack of trying. One case involved a 69-year-old woman from Fort Worth,
Gloria Meeks, who had helped an elderly, housebound neighbor vote by mail.
Abbott’s investigators harassed her at home—even spying on her when she
bathed—after it was discovered that Meeks had made a mistake by failing to
include her name, address, and signature on the back of the ballot she mailed in
for her friend. 

The attorney general’s office also developed a PowerPoint presentation for law
enforcement training that repeatedly depicted people of color as potential
offenders. One slide showed African Americans standing in line to vote, under
the heading “Poll Place Violation.” Another recommended that investigators
inspect “unique” postage stamps used by those who voted by mail, including a
stamp designed to raise awareness of sickle cell anemia, which
disproportionately affects African Americans. A pleading in a 2006 lawsuit filed
by the Washington, D.C.–based Campaign Legal Center said the slideshow
“communicates the message that minority voters should be the focus of election
fraud investigations and prosecutions.”

Abbott’s growing immoderation became more apparent after 2010, when, during the
backlash to Barack Obama’s election as president, Republicans—many of them tea
partiers—gained 22 seats in the Texas Legislature and demanded that top state
officials rebel against the Democrats in Washington. For Abbott, a former
staffer said, “that was the beginning of the political grandstanding.” 

The passage of the 2010 Affordable Care Act may have been a gift to many in
desperate need of health care coverage, but it was also a boon to Republicans
who labeled it socialism, an affront to individual rights, and a dangerous
expansion of government control. In a major political upset in 2012, the tea
party favorite for an open U.S. Senate seat, Cruz, defeated Lieutenant Governor
David Dewhurst. 

Abbott declined to issue an endorsement, which had to be a blow to Dewhurst (who
never responded to interview requests). Not only had the lieutenant governor
been a supporter of Abbott’s, he’d been an ally. But now Abbott distanced
himself from Dewhurst and grew chummier with Cruz. 

Dewhurst wasn’t the only friend or colleague to suffer abandonment. In one of
those weird coincidences that would seem foolishly contrived in a movie, one of
Abbott’s closest law school friends came back into his life in a new way: in
2013 Mark Phariss filed the lawsuit that would successfully overturn Texas’s ban
on gay marriage. Opposing the suit was Abbott, in his role as attorney general.
 

Phariss and Abbott had kept in touch over the years: Phariss had flown to
Houston the minute he’d heard about Abbott’s accident, and Abbott had helped
Phariss, who was a year behind Abbott at Vanderbilt, get an interview at Butler
& Binion that turned into an offer. (He took another job.) As early as Abbott’s
first campaign for a full term on the state Supreme Court, however, Phariss had
witnessed a change in his old friend. At a fundraiser at the home of a rich
donor, Phariss recalled, “there was a lot of bashing Democrats,
anti-education—whatever it was struck me as ‘I’m not on board with that, and
this is the last time I’m donating to Greg.’ And it was the last time.” 

Still, the two continued to exchange Christmas cards every year—until Phariss
sued the state for the right to marry the man he loved. The cards started coming
again after Phariss prevailed. But when Phariss ran for state Senate for
District Eight, which includes parts of Collin and Dallas counties, in 2018, the
Christmas cards stopped for good. “He hasn’t sent me one since,” Phariss said.
“Presumably he thinks there’s a political cost for sending a Christmas card to a
marriage equality plaintiff or someone running for office as a Democrat.”

The attorney general had more pressing priorities—specifically, challenging the
Obama administration. “I go into the office, I sue the federal government, and I
go home,” Abbott famously said in 2013. Two years later, when he would leave the
attorney general’s office, he had filed more than thirty suits against the feds,
spending millions in taxpayer dollars. 



The cases weren’t just about the Affordable Care Act. One of the most expensive
was Abbott’s million-dollar-plus fight in support of Texas’s voter ID law. (The
law eventually went into effect after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of
the Voting Rights Act in 2013.) Abbott spent almost $1 million to defend
Republican-friendly congressional maps the Legislature drew in 2011. 

More than half of Abbott’s lawsuits—nineteen of them—involved opposition to
regulations put in place by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Most of
them failed. But they sent the political signal that Abbott intended. As he
boasted in a 2012 speech to the Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce, “Texas
is picking to side with the business leaders in this state.”

Abbott’s overall won-lost record in litigation against the Obama administration 
is subject to debate. The attorney general’s office at one time claimed eight
wins and eight losses, saying other cases were pending. But a 2017 Texas Tribune
tabulation showed seven wins and eleven losses, with eight withdrawals and five
suits still pending at the time. Aside from protecting and advancing
Republicans’ political power in Texas, Abbott’s headline-grabbing lawsuits had
little tangible effect. But for Abbott, the suits were always wins, helping to
paint him as a champion of right-wing values and business interests in Texas and
beyond. 

The attorney general was not lawsuit-happy in every circumstance, however. In
2010 Abbott’s office built a substantial case that Donald Trump and Trump
University had cheated Texas enrollees out of $5.4 million, money they had paid
in fees and textbooks for bogus real-estate classes. “The ‘free workshops’ are
merely a selling ground for the Defendant Trump U’s 3-day seminars and offer
little useable content,” investigators from the AG’s office wrote. “The training
materials we have reviewed indicate that Trump University 3-day seminar
attendees are taught to prey upon homeowners in financial turmoil and to target
foreclosure properties.”

Even so, no suit was ever filed after Trump University agreed to quietly leave
the state. In 2016 the Associated Press uncovered $35,000 in Trump contributions
to Abbott’s first gubernatorial run. “I felt it was political then, and I feel
it was political now,” John Owens told me. A retired lawyer, Owens was an
assistant attorney general for twenty years, the last seven of them as deputy
chief of the Consumer Protection Division, under Abbott. “It left a bad taste in
my mouth when they didn’t file suit,” he said. “The only reason we didn’t do
this one was because Trump was beginning to be a mover and shaker in the
Republican party.” 

In 2014, as he was making his first run for governor, Abbott ruled that chemical
manufacturing and storage facilities could keep their contents secret, framing
his action as a way to protect them from terrorist attacks. The decision stood
out, coming on the heels of a 2013 disaster in the town of West, Texas, in which
hazardous ammonium nitrate stored on private property exploded during a fire,
killing 15 people and injuring 160. Abbott told reporters that anyone who wanted
to know what chemicals were stored where could easily find out. “You know where
they are if you drive around,” he said. “You can ask every facility whether or
not they have chemicals or not.” 

A Dallas Morning News investigation subsequently showed that five months after
the explosion in West, the attorney general had received a $25,000 contribution
from Chase Koch, the head of Koch Industries’ fertilizer division and the son of
the libertarian billionaire Charles Koch. The Kochs owned a chemical plant in
Sweetwater and had refineries in Texas too, at least one of which had been cited
for violations by the EPA. Representatives of Abbott and Koch denied any quid
pro quo. But Abbott’s close ties to the Kochs would only grow. By 2014, the
family’s contributions already totaled around $175,000. In 2013 Abbott was a
guest at a private Koch gathering of big donors at a luxury resort near
Albuquerque, at the foot of the Sandia Mountains. He got there courtesy of a
Koch jet. 

Critics said Abbott also failed to aggressively represent Texas homeowners in
their decade-long suit against Farmers Insurance for discrimination and
deceptive practices. Abbott’s predecessor as attorney general, John Cornyn, had
estimated that the company owed its policyholders close to $140 million. Abbott
settled the suit for $117 million. As the case moved toward settlement in 2014,
the Farmers employees’ political action committee contributed $50,000 to
Abbott’s first gubernatorial campaign.

“Why would you take money from anybody you’ve investigated?” Owens asked. “Why
not just say ‘I don’t want your money. I don’t need your money’?” 

But Abbott believed he did need money, and lots of it, to achieve his next goal.

When Abbott was elected governor in November 2014, his victory speech rang with
optimism: “Tonight, Texans sent a message,” he said. “You voted for hope over
fear, for unity over division, for the majesty of what Texas is and what it can
be. As Texans, the bonds we share transcend our differences.” But anyone who had
closely watched his bitter, bruising campaign might have heard those words with
some skepticism. Abbott, then 56, had raised $55 million to defeat Wendy Davis,
the up-by-her-bootstraps feminist who became a national star when, as a state
senator in 2013, she filibustered valiantly if unsuccessfully against a bill
limiting access to abortion. With a quick wit and enviable blond tresses, Davis
had looked initially like a formidable candidate, but she proved no match for an
opposition that labeled her “Abortion Barbie.” 

Davis’s team tried to expose Abbott as a hypocrite by using his post-accident
settlement against him. Medical malpractice awards in Texas had been capped at
$250,000 to $750,000 for noneconomic damages in 2003, and few lawyers were even
willing to take cases like the one that had brought Abbott millions. The Davis
campaign aired a TV commercial that opened with a close-up of a wheelchair,
recounted Abbott’s award, and then highlighted others who could no longer
recover significant damages after being hurt by hospitals and or on the job. The
ad ended starkly: “Greg Abbott: He’s not for you.”    

The attack backfired. Abbott had long declined to exploit his injury, preferring
instead to normalize it as much as possible. Now he weaponized it, branding
Davis as a cruel enemy of disabled people. He released a powerful commercial
that showed him in a T-shirt, drenched in sweat, using his arms to power himself
up floor after floor of an eight-story parking garage at night. “After my
accident, I had to rebuild my strength,” he said in a voice-over. “With each
floor, it got harder and harder, but I wouldn’t quit.” In a well-timed
appearance on Fox News, Abbott told prime-time host Sean Hannity, “If she wants
to attack a guy in a wheelchair, that’s her prerogative.” It was a shrewd bit of
jujitsu. Not long after, Abbott pulverized Davis 59 percent to 39 percent. 

Governor Abbott celebrating his 2015 inauguration with Lieutenant Governor Dan
Patrick.Robert Daemmrich/Getty

So, it was time to party. The governor’s inauguration was a two-day
extravaganza. There was a parade down Congress Avenue, an F-16 flyover, and a
barbecue for 17,000 that, according to one estimate, required four tons of
brisket and more than two tons of potato salad. The musical lineup for the
Future of Texas black-tie inaugural ball included the country stars Lady
Antebellum and Pat Green. Onstage, amid a shower of confetti, Abbott and newly
elected lieutenant governor Dan Patrick took selfies. The $4.7 million bill for
the festivities was picked up by generous donors, including Tim Dunn, the oilman
who founded Empower Texans, an enforcer of right-wing orthodoxy in Texas
Republican politics. Big energy donors included Chesapeake, ConocoPhillips, and
Chevron. AT&T and H-E-B contributed $100,000. Koch Industries chipped in
$50,000.

“I’ll never forget how lavish it was and how out of step it was from anything I
had ever attended in Texas politics,” recalled longtime TV reporter Doug Miller,
who covered Texas politics for decades. “The scale was grandiose. A security
sweep for a governor’s event? Come on. It said, right away, where was this guy
aiming to go?”

That question would be asked more frequently as Abbott made himself at home in
the governor’s office. His GOP predecessors had policy priorities: Bush had
championed education and tort reform, while Perry had emphasized subsidies and
regulatory relief for businesses while recruiting new ones from out of state.
Within months of taking office, Abbott made it clear where his own priorities
would lie. 

“My first indication that he’d become something different was that Jade Helm
thing,” said Matthew Dowd. “I thought, ‘This is not the guy I thought he was’
when he completely waded into that conspiracy with no evidence, just responding
to the crazies of the Republican party.”

Jade Helm was a routine federal military training exercise that, thanks to
alt-right web hysteria fueled by a Russian disinformation campaign, came to be
seen—at least by the tinfoil-hat crowd—as a nefarious Obama plot to establish
martial law in Texas and beyond. (Dissidents, they claimed, would be jailed in
abandoned Walmarts.) Instead of laughing off the conspiracy theorists, Abbott
called out the Texas State Guard to monitor the U.S. military and, for his
trouble, was lambasted in the national media and mocked on Jon Stewart’s Daily
Show. 

> Abbott’s political cynicism was accompanied by a profound lack of interest in
> the legislative process and the people involved in it.

But if the rest of the country—and a lot of Texans—thought the governor was a
dunderhead, they thought wrong. Out of the starting gate, Abbott was signaling
his intention to win the loyalty of the right wing of the Republican party. The
calculus was simple. Of almost 30 million Texans, nearly 22 million are eligible
to vote. Only 2 million typically vote in Republican primaries—and those voters
tend to be on the far right. That means 1 million voters plus 1—just 3.4 percent
of the state’s population—can determine the winner of statewide elections. And
that winner is a virtual lock to triumph in the general election. As a result,
no matter how much money candidates raise, they can’t hope to win a Republican
primary without the support of the far-right base, who reliably vote in
primaries that the vast majority of Texans sit out. 

Regardless of who Greg Abbott had been or what he had supported in the past, he
had not just adopted but embraced the playbook of right-wing political tactics,
where you didn’t have to be a true believer to win. “They get the benefit of the
headlines for their base, but they could care less whether their policies
actually pass or not,” said a former Republican member of the
Legislature.“That’s where the cynicism is.”

Abbott’s cynicism was accompanied by a profound lack of interest in the
legislative process and the people involved in it. While Perry’s door had been
open, Abbott’s was closed. Perry was often seen on the floor of both houses,
hobnobbing, joshing, reading the room. What do you need? What are your
priorities? he would ask new members, and he would give honest answers about
whether he could or would help with a piece of legislation. “Rick Perry was a
little shady, but at least he knew how it worked,” said a former Republican
House member. “He was shrewd, and he had Democrat friends, and he knew how to
literally massage shoulders. Abbott never had that touch.” Instead, he
surrounded himself with loyalists, while avoiding much contact with lawmakers. 

Within a year of taking office, Abbott took a cue from the despised Obama
administration by issuing executive orders to get around the Legislature.
Meanwhile, lawmakers from Abbott’s own party received no notice that their bills
were going to be vetoed, until they were. (Perry had always been specific about
changes he wanted in exchange for his signature.) These actions supported the
growing opinion that Abbott was governing like the judge he had been years back.
“He’s not a king, he’s a governor,” said representative Lyle Larson of San
Antonio, a conservative Republican who would soon face the governor’s wrath for
occasionally bucking him. (Abbott campaigned for Larson’s primary challenger in
2018, though Larson survived.) “He takes a more autocratic approach that goes
against everything our state and national constitution is about.” 

While Abbott demanded loyalty from his staff, he didn’t seem to understand its
value in his dealings with the Legislature. Early in his tenure, he endorsed a
$130 million program for pre-K classes to give an early lift to Texas’s poorest,
most vulnerable children. But the bill lacked Democratic support; the party’s
lawmakers didn’t think it went far enough. Meanwhile, the measure was vehemently
opposed by tea party Republicans, many of whom would prefer that more Texans
attend religious schools and other private institutions. They called it “an
affront to parental rights.” 

Abbott had some moderate Republican support but not enough. “We got called into
a caucus, and the governor literally begged us to pass the bill,” said one of
the GOP legislators who was present. To ensure its success, Abbott promised
Republicans who voted for the bill that he would support them in the next
election. The measure passed, but Abbott failed to keep his promise. “Motherf—er
didn’t return a single phone call” when the campaigns came around, the
legislator said. “Republican members felt like he had abandoned them.”

Abbott focused instead on his own campaigns. “Money is the political currency he
understands most,” said Jonathan Stickland, a Republican who recently retired
from the House after serving since 2013. Stickland was a tea party acolyte from
Bedford active in the right-wing Freedom Caucus. Yet his sense of Abbott’s
priorities jibes with that of many liberals and moderates.

If he didn’t have time for legislators, Abbott has always had plenty for his
major donors—especially those who’ve given, say, $500,000. A sizable chunk of
his campaign cash—more than $11 million in 2014 alone—has come from energy
companies. (In 2014 oilman Ray Hunt chipped in $552,110; S. Javaid Anwar, the
Pakistani immigrant who founded Midland Energy, ponied up $533,342. Companies
such as Exxon, Occidental Petroleum, and Valero Energy weighed in with
five-figure contributions.)

During his regular check-ins with his benefactors, Abbott always makes sure to
ask about their spouses and kids. “Every time he talks to them, he’s talked to
them three times about something else, and that’s a very effective strategy,”
said Matt Angle, director of the Lone Star Project. “I wish Democrats raised
money like that.” 

> If he didn’t have time for legislators, Abbott has always had plenty for his
> major donors—especially those who’ve given, say, $500,000.

Sometimes, the governor might also ask for advice on energy policy or water
conservation or border security, even when he already knows what he’s going to
do. (“Let me know if you have any thoughts. Been great talking to you!”) Other
times, he’ll bring up some new initiative he thinks a contributor will want to
join to burnish his or her image. (The most obvious example came in 2020, when,
in the wake of the first phase of the pandemic, Abbott formed an advisory
committee of 39 Texans that included 25 members who had been contributors since
2015 and given a combined total of $5.8 million.) 

What if donors drag their heels or write a check that falls short of
expectations? The governor might try his standard gambit of reminding them that
they’re among Abbott’s “hundred most important advisers”—a savvy tactic, because
he knows that competitive people want to be a lot closer to the center of power
than that and will ante up to do so. Conversely, the implied threat of exile
from the center of power would be as terrifying to these donors as, say, flying
commercial.

Over time, Abbott has become more direct about his expectations for a donation,
with a reminder of what he’d done for the donor recently; either an aide or the
governor himself would mention a special legislative or regulatory move Abbott
had made on the donor’s behalf. Two loyal donors to Abbott’s campaigns said that
he doesn’t hesitate to link his solicitations to favors that he has done for
their industries. “He’ll say, ‘I’m sure you saw the news about that action we
took that’s going to save your company millions a year,’ ” one said. “Then he’ll
add, ‘That shows the value of you continuing to be one of my top supporters and
advisers, and I need to know whether I can count on you to step up your
giving.’ ” 

Abbott and former president Donald Trump speaking in front of the border wall in
Pharr on June 30, 2021.Joel Martinez/AP

Many politicos sensed that a new goal motivated Abbott’s accelerated
fund-raising and right-shifting during his early years as governor. “The plan
all along was Abbott thought Hillary would win the election and he would run
against Hillary” in 2020, said Stickland. But then “Trump won, which messed up
his plans completely.” 

Suddenly, Abbott had to prove, even more powerfully than before, his right-wing
bona fides—as defined by a new president about whom he’d been lukewarm in the
beginning. “I may not agree with everything that Donald Trump says—I didn’t
agree with everything that Mitt Romney stood for or that John McCain stood for,”
Abbott had told CNBC’s Squawk Alley in May 2016, after his preferred candidate,
his protégé Cruz, was chewed up and spit out by Trump. “But here’s what I do
know . . . Hillary is far worse for America than Donald Trump would be.” 

Trump and Abbott were not a natural fit—the brash, crude Republican nominee bore
no resemblance to Abbott’s sense of himself as a Texas gentleman and former
judge. And one might think that Trump’s public contempt for Americans with
disabilities would have given Abbott pause. But for someone of Abbott’s
ambition, those were just matters of style that could be worked around. Besides,
he was playing catch-up: Dan Patrick, who had been challenging Abbott both
behind his back and to his face since their election in 2014, had
enthusiastically endorsed Trump and served as his Texas campaign chair. 

Patrick had been elected to the Senate in 2006 and, as a former sportscaster
turned right-wing radio shock jock, had honed a gift for rabble-rousing. He was
a my-way-or-the-highway guy, and once voters put him in charge of the Senate,
Patrick set about immediately bending his colleagues to his will, with
retribution on the menu for those who refused to comply. The Republican base
loved him, but Abbott was never a fan. 

The feeling has been mutual. Last summer, when Patrick was agitating for a
special session of the Legislature, Abbott said, “That’s pretty goofy because
everybody knows there’s only one person with the authority to call a special
session and that’s the governor.” He went on to declare, “Not only am I the only
one with the authority to call a special session, I get to decide when and I get
to decide what will be on that special session.” Meanwhile, Patrick, it was
later reported, tried to convince Rick Perry to run against Abbott in the GOP
primary this year. 

Still, the two collaborated on key issues, including their shared desire to
undermine the authority of Democrats who had been elected to lead most of
Texas’s major cities and urban counties. Abbott and Patrick developed what Jim
Henson and Joshua Blank, who run the Texas Politics Project at UT, have called
“the clearest and most persistent articulation yet of a sustained attack on the
autonomy of local governments.” When Houston mayor Sylvester Turner refused
Trump’s demand to have law enforcement officers check the immigration status of
those arrested for minor crimes and report the undocumented to Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, Abbott—who’d once fought to protect immigrants from bogus
legal advice—sided with the president, signing a bill to ban so-called sanctuary
cities in Texas. 

As he abandoned the conservative principle of “local control,” Abbott even got
involved in micro-issues in several cities—nixing local ordinances governing
tree removal and the addition of bike lanes and wider sidewalks to urban streets
by executive edict. “As opposed to the state having to take multiple rifleshot
approaches at overriding local regulations,” he said in a Q&A session with the
Texas Conservative Coalition Research Institute in March 2017, “I think a
broad-based law by the State of Texas that says ‘Across the board the state is
going to preempt local regulations’ is a superior approach.”          

For a time, Texas’s top two politicians managed to keep their enmity under
wraps, often through their use and abuse of House Speaker Joe Straus. A
well-liked moderate Republican from San Antonio, Straus had served in the
Legislature since 2005. He was famously caught in the middle over the notorious
“bathroom bill” of 2017, which would have required transgender Texans to relieve
themselves in public restrooms based on their assigned sex at birth. Patrick
pushed hard for the legislation, as did Abbott—at least in public. Behind the
scenes, however, the governor was getting strong blowback from the state’s
business leaders, including some who were major campaign contributors. A similar
bill that passed in North Carolina in 2016 had incited boycotts of the state by
major conventions and the loss of an NBA All-Star game in Charlotte. 

As the bathroom bill made its way to a vote, Abbott kept assuring concerned
members of the corporate community that they needn’t worry, because “Joe won’t
let it pass.” Abbott was correct about that. But Straus soon announced that he
would not seek reelection in 2018. Moderates in the Legislature and the business
community had lost their strongest bulwark against the right—and so had Abbott.

Abbott’s desire to placate one group of supporters without offending another
could be viewed in somewhat comical fashion during last year’s legislative fight
over a bill that would have prevented pet owners from chaining their animals
outdoors amid extreme heat or cold. As the Safe Outdoor Dogs Act worked its way
to passage in the House and Senate, its sponsor—conservative Democrat Eddie
Lucio Jr., who had frequently bucked his own party leadership to support
Abbott’s policies—kept the governor’s office apprised of its provisions and
heard of no concerns. When the bill reached Abbott’s desk, he not only refused
to sign it, he publicly lambasted it. “Texas is no place for this kind of
micromanaging and over-criminalization,” he declared. 

Abbott probably thought that was that. But almost immediately, #AbbottHatesDogs
started trending on Twitter. The governor got an earful, including from donors
and other supporters. Realizing that he had stepped in it, the governor slipped
the bill back on the agenda during a special session last September, where
preventing pet abuse was suddenly on par with redistricting. The bill passed
again, with negligible changes, and this time Abbott signed it—with no public
statement. 

The tortured journey of the Safe Outdoor Dogs Act would be easy to write off if
it didn’t contain so many of the hallmarks of Abbott’s leadership: his shifts
with the political winds, his betrayal of loyal colleagues, his decision-making
by fiat, and his disdain for the legislative process. In that way, it serves as
a paradigm for his handling of crises such as the coronavirus, which has so far
killed more than 87,000 Texans, and the blackouts of February 2021, which left
11 million without power in freezing temperatures and killed as many as 700. In
both cases, Abbott’s political priorities were never far from his policy
choices.

COVID-19 presented a challenge to every leader, of course, including those in
Washington. The two health experts I interviewed said that during the early
stages of the pandemic, Abbott kept up with the science and tried to do what was
best for Texans. But politics kept getting in his way, as when Dallas
hairdresser Shelley Luther was jailed in May 2020 for reopening her salon, which
was supposed to remain closed—under Abbott’s decree—as a nonessential business.
When the right-wing media started giving Luther the star treatment, Abbott
reversed himself. “I join the Attorney General in disagreeing with the excessive
action by the Dallas Judge, putting Shelley Luther in jail for seven days,” he
said in a statement. “Compliance with executive orders during this pandemic is
important to ensure public safety; however, surely there are less restrictive
means to achieving that goal than jailing a Texas mother.” 



In the summer of 2021, Abbott banned government agencies, cities, counties, and
school districts from imposing vaccine mandates—but vowed that he wouldn’t
interfere with businesses that required vaccinations for their workers or
customers. “Private businesses don’t need government running their business,”
his spokesperson said. But after Abbott’s right-wing primary opponents squawked,
the governor again reversed himself, issuing a new executive order that banned
all “vaccine mandates.”  

When Texans suffered widespread blackouts last year, Abbott didn’t flip-flop so
much as obfuscate. His first instinct, played out on Fox News, was to blame the
disaster on windmills. (In fact, the outages would have been worse if not for
Texas’s abundant wind energy.) The big winter storm struck a swath of U.S.
states from the Pacific Northwest to New England, but only Texas suffered
widespread outages—because the state had refused to require winterization of
power plants and the natural gas supplies that fuel most of them. Texas had
suffered similarly in 2011, and postmortem studies made clear what state
officials needed to do to prevent a repeat disaster. Little was done. And little
has been done since the catastrophe of 2021. 

Abbott and the Legislature have taken their marching orders from the state’s
natural gas industry, which is one of the biggest contributors to political
campaigns. Several gas companies scored billions of dollars in windfall profits
during the blackouts, especially after regulators appointed by Abbott kept
energy prices at extraordinarily high levels for more than three days. 

One of most prominent donors was Kelcy Warren, executive chairman and chairman
of the board of directors of Energy Transfer LP, based in Dallas. His company
pocketed $2.4 billion from high prices during and following the blackouts, after
which Warren gave $1 million to Abbott’s campaign. Jerry Jones, owner of the
Dallas Cowboys and the largest shareholder of Comstock Resources (and a loyal
Abbott contributor since 2010), spent $115,000 on a lunch for Abbott’s
reelection campaign in 2018. Comstock’s chief financial officer called the 2021
blackout a “jackpot” for the company. Kinder Morgan, the pipeline giant, posted
record profits of $1.4 billion during the first quarter of 2021, causing Forbes
magazine to label it “Texas’ Freeze Winner.” 

Rich Kinder, the executive chairman, has been a dependable and generous Abbott
supporter since 2001. Kinder’s wife, Nancy, was a member of Abbott’s pandemic
task force. In 2019 alone, the couple gave a total of $250,000 to Abbott. (Asked
for comment on any quid-pro-quo, Warren’s representative responded that the
libel lawsuit he has filed against Beto O’Rourke for that allegation serves as
his response. Kinder’s representative declined to comment, while Jerry Jones’s
representative did not respond.)

Over the next thirty years, Texans will have to pay about $5.7 billion in higher
electricity bills to cover the costs that utilities incurred for expensive
natural gas during the 2021 blackout. This past winter, many worried—none more
than Abbott—that another storm might knock out the lights and heat again. Texas
dodged that bullet, however, and so did the governor.    

> In a national campaign, Abbott’s record as governor would provide ample fodder
> for his opponents—on the right and the left.

After his presumptive reelection in November, what race will Greg Abbott, the
striver from Duncanville, run next? There is only one political goalpost left,
and he is frequently mentioned as a potential candidate for the Republican
presidential nomination in 2024—if Donald Trump doesn’t run, that is. The
governor has been busy amassing his most sizable war chest yet, raising
$93.3 million and counting for the current cycle, far more than he likely needs
to dispatch Beto O’Rourke, who had $6 million in the campaign till as of
February 1. 

On paper, reaching the presidential finish line first seems plausible. But if
Abbott guns for the ultimate political prize, he will find himself pitted
against a large field of skilled Trump imitators led by the vigorous 43-year-old
press magnet Ron DeSantis. In that race, Abbott would not be able to maintain
the iron grip on his public image that he has long enjoyed in Texas. There could
be no more hiding in plain sight, donning quasi-official costumes while issuing
empty pronouncements to friendly crowds. There could be no more dodging debates.
To become an appealing national candidate, Abbott would have to open himself up.
He would have to become, for the first time, a full-fledged public personality. 

Abbott’s record as governor would also provide ample fodder for his opponents—on
the right and the left. Yes, Abbott can soothe corporate donors, as previous
Texas presidential candidates have, by claiming that his state has done
miraculous things; Texas adds 3,800 residents each week, after all, and has
attracted the likes of Oracle, Tesla, and Charles Schwab. And Abbott can compete
with DeSantis when it comes to his right-wing policy record: blocking
immigrants, banning abortion, encouraging handgun proliferation, tormenting
transgender youth and their families, and restricting how teachers instruct
students in matters of race and gender and history. 

But other parts of Abbott’s record would get more attention in a national
campaign than they do in his home state—particularly if he manages to win the
GOP nomination and enter a general election. Under his leadership, Texas has
ranked in the bottom half of the states in health-care measures that include
diabetes rates, child immunizations, and maternal mortality. Texas has the
highest proportion of uninsured citizens in the U.S., 18.4 percent. 

Educational attainment has dropped on Abbott’s watch; in 2015 the state ranked
thirty-ninth in the nation in fourth grade reading proficiency; by 2019, Texas
had fallen to forty-fifth. Scott McClelland, the president of H-E-B, has stated
publicly that his company has had to shift the reading level of its training
manual from eighth grade to fifth grade. 

So far, Abbott has largely skirted the blame for such problems and received
considerable credit for the state’s economic successes. Some wonder what fresh
policy goals Abbott might set for his third term. “What,” one veteran Republican
lobbyist asked, “does he really want to accomplish?” 

But that question misses the point. Abbott’s benchmarks of success are purely
political and largely personal. He wants what he always has wanted: to run and
run, just to see how far he can go.



CORRECTION: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that Kinder
Morgan posted record profits of $1.4 million during the first quarter of 2021.
The correct figure is $1.4 billion. The article has been updated.



This article originally appeared in the May 2022 issue of Texas Monthly with the
headline “What Drives Greg Abbott?” Subscribe today.


READ NEXT

 * How a 27-Year-Old Texan Became the Face of Russia’s American TV Network as It
   Imploded
 * Love and Death in Silicon Prairie, Part I: Candy Montgomery’s Affair
 * Love and Death in Silicon Prairie, Part II: The Killing of Betty Gore
 * Greg Abbott’s Unintentionally Warm Welcome of Asylum-Seekers
 * This $14,000 Air Filter Promises to “Kill” COVID. Is It Worth the Price?
 * The Dead Sea of West Texas Just Got Deadlier


From the May 2022 Issue Subscribe


GET ALL OUR STORIES IN ONE DAILY EMAIL

It’s free. It’s daily. And it’s full of great reads, y’all.

Email Address Sign Up


 * 

See All Newsletters

Privacy Policy

If you fill out the first name, last name, or agree to terms fields, you will
NOT be added to the newsletter list. Leave them blank to get signed up.
First Name
Last Name

 * Home
 * Share on Facebook
 * Share on Twitter
 * Email a link to this page
 * Share on Pinterest
 * Print
 * Copy URL
   https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/who-is-greg-abbott/?utm_source=texasmonthly.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=sharebutton
 * Show More


View 12 Comments


RECOMMENDED

Politics & Policy


GREG ABBOTT’S UNINTENTIONALLY WARM WELCOME OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS

By Jack Herrera

Politics & Policy


“MIGRANT LOCKDOWNS” ARE THE NEW ACTIVE-SHOOTER DRILLS IN THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY

By Aaron Nelsen

Politics & Policy


IS OUR CHILDREN LEARNING TOO MUCH?

By Christopher Hooks

Politics & Policy


THE DEAD SEA OF WEST TEXAS JUST GOT DEADLIER

By Russell Gold

Politics & Policy


MEET THE KING RANCH SCION WHO WANTS TO BE TEXAS LAND COMMISSIONER

By Michael Hardy

Politics & Policy


GREG ABBOTT’S LATEST BORDER THEATER

By Jack Herrera


TRENDING


 1.  LOVE AND DEATH IN SILICON PRAIRIE, PART I: CANDY MONTGOMERY’S AFFAIR
     
     By Jim Atkinson and John Bloom


 2.  THIS SEASONING IS THE WORST-KEPT SECRET IN TEXAS BARBECUE
     
     By Daniel Vaughn


 3.  THE TEXANIST: WHY IS EL PASO KNOWN AS EL CHUCO?
     
     By David Courtney


 4.  TEXANS, MEET YOUR ADORABLE, BLOODTHIRSTY NEW NEIGHBORS
     
     By Madeleine Aggeler


 5.  THE DEAD SEA OF WEST TEXAS JUST GOT DEADLIER
     
     By Russell Gold


 6.  HOW A 27-YEAR-OLD TEXAN BECAME THE FACE OF RUSSIA’S AMERICAN TV NETWORK AS
     IT IMPLODED
     
     By Forrest Wilder


 7.  GREG ABBOTT’S UNINTENTIONALLY WARM WELCOME OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS
     
     By Jack Herrera


 8.  LOVE AND DEATH IN SILICON PRAIRIE, PART II: THE KILLING OF BETTY GORE
     
     By Jim Atkinson and John Bloom


 9.  WHO IS GREG ABBOTT?
     
     By Mimi Swartz


 10. APOCALYPTIC, ACID-SPEWING CRAZY ANTS INVADED TEXAS. NOW SCIENTISTS HAVE A
     “SILVER BULLET” TO OBLITERATE THEM.
     
     By Will Bostwick




We report on vital issues from politics to education and are the indispensable
authority on the Texas scene, covering everything from music to cultural events
with insightful recommendations.

Subscribe Now


SUBSCRIBE

 * Subscribe
 * Newsletters
 * Join TM BBQ Club
 * TM BBQ Fest
 * Manage Subscription
 * Subscription Help
 * Renew
 * Give a Gift
 * Back Issues
 * Buy Merch


SECTIONS

 * News & Politics
 * Arts & Entertainment
 * Being Texan
 * Food & Drink
 * BBQ
 * Travel & Outdoors
 * Magazine
 * Podcasts
 * Video


ABOUT

 * About Us
 * Careers
 * Advertise
 * Texas Monthly Studio
 * FAQs
 * Privacy
 * Terms
 * Do Not Sell My Data

 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Instagram
 * Pinterest
 * YouTube
 * RSS

Copyright © 2022. All Rights Reserved.