www.fsb.org
Open in
urlscan Pro
172.67.179.181
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.fsb.org/2020/10/the-use-of-supervisory-and-regulatory-technology-by-authorities-and-regulated-institutio...
Submission: On November 12 via api from UA — Scanned from DE
Submission: On November 12 via api from UA — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOMhttps://www.fsb.org/
<form class="mega-search expand-to-left mega-search-closed" action="https://www.fsb.org/">
<span class="dashicons dashicons-search search-icon"></span>
<input type="submit" value="Search">
<input type="text" aria-label="Search" data-placeholder="Search" name="s">
</form>
https://www.fsb.org/
<form class="mega-search expand-to-left mega-search-closed" role="search" action="https://www.fsb.org/"><input type="text" tabindex="-1" role="searchbox" id="mega-search-61" aria-label="Search..." data-placeholder="Search..." name="s"
placeholder=""><span tabindex="0" role="button" class="dashicons dashicons-search search-icon" aria-controls="mega-search-61" aria-label="Search" aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true"></span><input type="submit" value="Search"> </form>
Text Content
* * * About the FSB * * * ABOUT THE FSB * Mandate * Work Programme * Members of the FSB * Regional Consultative Groups * History * Contact * * ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE Find out more about the committees and composition of the FSB. * * LEADING BY EXAMPLE Read about FSB members’ commitment to lead by example in terms of their adherence to international standards. * Work of the FSB * * * VULNERABILITIES ASSESSMENT * MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION OF REFORMS * ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF REFORMS * COMPENDIUM OF STANDARDS * * FINANCIAL INNOVATION AND STRUCTURAL CHANGE * Climate-related Risks * Cross-border Payments * Crypto-assets and Global “Stablecoins” * Cyber Resilience * Financial Innovation * Non-Bank Financial Intermediation * * MARKET AND INSTITUTIONAL RESILIENCE * Accounting and Auditing * Crisis Management and Resolution * Derivatives Markets and Central Counterparties * Global Systemically Important Financial Institutions * LIBOR and Other Benchmarks * Market Fragmentation * Post-2008 Financial Crisis Reforms * Publications * * * ALL PUBLICATIONS * Policy Documents * Progress Reports * Evaluation Reports * Reports to the G20 * Peer Review Reports * Key Regular Publications * Regional Consultative Group Reports * * 18 DECEMBER 2023 GLOBAL MONITORING REPORT ON NON-BANK FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION 2023 Report assesses global trends and vulnerabilities in the non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) sector. * * LATEST PUBLICATIONS Achieving Consistent and Comparable Climate-related Disclosures: 2024 Progress report 12 November 2024 Depositor Behaviour and Interest Rate and Liquidity Risks in the Financial System: Lessons from the March 2023 banking turmoil 23 October 2024 FSB Chair’s letter to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors: October 2024 22 October 2024 The Financial Stability Implications of Tokenisation 22 October 2024 * Consultations * * * ALL CONSULTATIONS * Current Consultations * Past Consultations * Past consultation responses * * * CURRENT CONSULTATIONS Format for Incident Reporting Exchange (FIRE): Consultation report 17 October 2024 * Press * * * ALL PRESS * Plenary Meetings * Announcements * Press Releases * Speeches and Statements * Video and Audio * * 5 SEPTEMBER 2024 THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE Speech by John Schindler, FSB Secretary General, at the 2024 Global Economy and Financial Stability Conference. * * LATEST PRESS RELEASES FSB reports on progress towards globally consistent and comparable climate-related disclosures 12 November 2024 FSB MENA Group discusses artificial intelligence, cyber risk and operational readiness 6 November 2024 FSB analyses interest rate and liquidity risks and the role of technology and social media on depositor behaviour 23 October 2024 FSB Chair sets out the FSB’s work to maintain financial stability amidst technological advancements 22 October 2024 * * * * * * PublicationsReports to the G20The Use of Supervisory and Regulatory Technology by Authorities and Regulated Institutions: Market developments and financial stability implications THE USE OF SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY TECHNOLOGY BY AUTHORITIES AND REGULATED INSTITUTIONS: MARKET DEVELOPMENTS AND FINANCIAL STABILITY IMPLICATIONS 9 October 2020 | PDF full text (1 MB) This report finds that technology and innovation are transforming the global financial landscape, presenting opportunities, risks and challenges for regulated institutions and authorities alike. The opportunities offered by SupTech and RegTech have been created by the substantial increase in availability and granularity of data, and new infrastructure such as cloud computing and application programming interfaces. These allow large data sets to be collected, stored and analysed more efficiently. Authorities and regulated institutions have both turned to these technologies to help them manage the increased regulatory requirements that were put in place after the 2008 financial crisis. SupTech and RegTech tools could have important benefits for financial stability. For authorities, the use of SupTech could improve oversight, surveillance and analytical capabilities, and generate real-time indicators of risk to support forward looking, judgement based, supervision and policymaking. For regulated institutions, the use of RegTech could improve compliance outcomes, enhance risk management capabilities, and generate new insights into the business for improved decision-making. For both authorities and regulated institutions, the efficiency and effectiveness gains, and possible improvement in quality arising from automation of previously manual processes, is a significant consideration. SupTech is a strategic priority for an increasing number of authorities. Based on a survey of FSB members, the majority of respondents had a SupTech, innovation or data strategy in place, with the use of such strategies growing significantly since 2016. PRIMARY DEMAND DRIVERS FOR DEVELOPING A SUPTECH STRATEGY: NO. OF AUTHORITIES WHO RANK DRIVER AS MOST IMPORTANT Authorities are also vigilant to possible risks that could arise from the use of SupTech and RegTech technologies. Survey responses indicated that the risk reported to be of greatest concern was around resourcing, followed by cyber risk, reputational risk and data quality issues. A particular risk is over-reliance on methods built on historic data, which could lead to incorrect inferences about the future, and the potential for limited transparency of SupTech and RegTech tools. Looking to the future, the potentially catalytic role of data standards and the importance of effective governance frameworks for the use of SupTech and RegTech were also emphasised. The report includes 28 case studies giving practical examples on how SupTech and RegTech tools are being used. The report is being delivered to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors for their virtual meeting on 14 October. Content Type(s): Publications Reports to the G20 Source(s): FSB Policy Area(s): Financial Innovation Supervision and Risk Management RELATED INFORMATION FINANCIAL INNOVATION The FSB is working actively with international bodies to monitor FinTech, and to identify regulatory and supervisory issues raised by FinTech that merit authorities’ attention from a financial stability perspective. PRESS RELEASE 9 OCTOBER 2020 FSB REPORT HIGHLIGHTS INCREASED USE OF REGTECH AND SUPTECH The increased use of supervisory and regulatory technology is transforming the global financial landscape, presenting opportunities, risks and challenges. Share: Copyright © 2024 | Financial Stability Board * Terms and Conditions * Privacy Notice * Cookie Notice * Sitemap * Contact * * * *