kirschsubstack.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:4400::6812:2857 Public Scan

Back to summary

URL:
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web
Submission: On December 13 via manual (December 13th 2023, 1:38:27 am UTC) from NZ — Scanned from NZ

Form analysis
5 forms found in the DOM

<form class="frontend-components-SubscribePrompt-module__form--HqYBK"><input placeholder="Type your email..." value="" class="frontend-components-SubscribePrompt-module__emailInput--rslUF">
  <div id="error-container"></div><button type="submit"
    class="pencraft frontend-pencraft-Button-module__buttonBase--T0hXz frontend-pencraft-Button-module__button--d6e9L frontend-pencraft-Button-module__priority_primary-theme--o7dw6 frontend-pencraft-Button-module__size_medium--PaDMH frontend-pencraft-Button-module__fill_filled--ysyt0 frontend-pencraft-Button-module__grow--PaHXm pc-justifyContent-center"
    tabindex="0">Subscribe</button>
</form>

POST /api/v1/free?nojs=true

<form action="/api/v1/free?nojs=true" method="post" class="form frontend-components-free_email_form-module__form--LDIzl" novalidate=""><input type="hidden" name="first_url"
    value="https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=substack&amp;utm_campaign=post_embed&amp;utm_medium=web"><input type="hidden" name="first_referrer"><input type="hidden" name="current_url"
    value="https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=substack&amp;utm_campaign=post_embed&amp;utm_medium=web"><input type="hidden" name="current_referrer"><input type="hidden" name="referral_code"><input type="hidden"
    name="source" value="subscribe-widget"><input type="hidden" name="referring_pub_id"><input type="hidden" name="additional_referring_pub_ids">
  <div class="frontend-components-free_email_form-module__sideBySideWrap--yhsgv">
    <div class="frontend-components-free_email_form-module__emailInputWrapper--BXNrb"><input type="email" name="email" placeholder="Type your email..." class="pencraft frontend-components-free_email_form-module__emailInput--BLQGf"></div><button
      type="submit" class="button rightButton primary subscribe-btn frontend-components-free_email_form-module__button--WcLG9" tabindex="0"><span class="button-text ">Subscribe</span></button>
  </div>
  <div id="error-container"></div>
</form>

POST

<form method="post" class="form comment-input" novalidate="">
  <picture>
    <source type="image/webp" srcset="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_64,h_64,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep,g_auto/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Favatars%2Flogged-out.png"><img
      src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_64,h_64,c_fill,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep,g_auto/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Favatars%2Flogged-out.png" sizes="100vw" alt="" style="width: 32px; height: 32px;" width="64" height="64"
      class="frontend-components-responsive_img-module__img--Pgjj2 frontend-reader2-Avatar-module__avatar--nE_uY pencraft pc-reset">
  </picture>
  <div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-flexDirection-column frontend-pencraft-Box-module__flexGrow--mx4xz pc-reset comment-input-right"><textarea data-gramm="false" data-gramm_editor="false" data-enable-grammarly="false" name="body"
      placeholder="Write a comment..." style="height: 96px;"></textarea>
    <div id="error-container"></div>
    <div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-paddingTop-8 pc-justifyContent-space-between pc-alignItems-center pc-reset"></div>
  </div>
</form>

POST /api/v1/free?nojs=true

<form action="/api/v1/free?nojs=true" method="post" class="form frontend-components-free_email_form-module__form--LDIzl" novalidate=""><input type="hidden" name="first_url"
    value="https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=substack&amp;utm_campaign=post_embed&amp;utm_medium=web"><input type="hidden" name="first_referrer"><input type="hidden" name="current_url"
    value="https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=substack&amp;utm_campaign=post_embed&amp;utm_medium=web"><input type="hidden" name="current_referrer"><input type="hidden" name="referral_code"><input type="hidden"
    name="source" value="subscribe_footer"><input type="hidden" name="referring_pub_id"><input type="hidden" name="additional_referring_pub_ids">
  <div class="frontend-components-free_email_form-module__sideBySideWrap--yhsgv">
    <div class="frontend-components-free_email_form-module__emailInputWrapper--BXNrb"><input type="email" name="email" placeholder="Type your email..."
        class="pencraft frontend-components-free_email_form-module__emailInput--BLQGf frontend-components-free_email_form-module__emailInputOnAccentBackground--WwaMR"></div><button type="submit"
      class="button rightButton primary subscribe-btn frontend-components-free_email_form-module__button--WcLG9 frontend-components-free_email_form-module__buttonOnAccentBackground--pxtYI" tabindex="0"><span
        class="button-text ">Subscribe</span></button>
  </div>
  <div id="error-container"></div>
</form>

POST /api/v1/user/profile

<form class="form " action="/api/v1/user/profile" method="post" novalidate=""><label for="name">Name (Required)</label><input autofocus="true" type="text" class="profile-name" placeholder="Type your name..." name="name" id="name"><label
    for="handle">Handle</label><input type="text" class="profile-name" placeholder="Type your handle..." name="handle" id="handle"><label for="bio">Bio</label><textarea class="profile-bio" placeholder="Say something about yourself..." name="bio"
    id="bio"></textarea><input type="email" class="profile-email" placeholder="Your email…" name="email"><label class="profile-signup-checkbox"><input type="checkbox" name="free_signup" checked=""> Subscribe to the newsletter</label><input
    type="hidden" name="confirmation_redirect_pathname" value="/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new"><input type="hidden" name="photo_url"><input type="hidden" name="user_id"><input type="hidden" name="needs_photo" value="false"><input type="hidden"
    name="token">
  <div id="error-container"></div>
  <p class="left hidden">undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (<a>edit</a>)</p>
  <div class="modal-ctas">
    <p class="skip hidden"><a class="small">Skip for now</a></p><button tabindex="0" type="submit" class="button primary">Save &amp; Post Comment</button>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

STEVE KIRSCH'S NEWSLETTER

Subscribe
Sign in

Share this post

DATA FROM HEALTH NEW ZEALAND CONFIRMS THAT THE COVID VACCINES HAVE KILLED OVER
10 MILLION WORLDWIDE

kirschsubstack.com
Copy link

Facebook

Note

Other

DISCOVER MORE FROM STEVE KIRSCH'S NEWSLETTER

I write about COVID mitigation policies, vaccines, corruption, censorship, and
early treatments. The data shows that vaccines are ruining the health of
Americans and driving the epidemic in a variety of health conditions.
Over 234,000 subscribers

Subscribe
Continue reading
Sign in

DATA FROM HEALTH NEW ZEALAND CONFIRMS THAT THE COVID VACCINES HAVE KILLED OVER
10 MILLION WORLDWIDE

IT'S FINALLY HERE: RECORD-LEVEL DATA SHOWING VACCINE TIMING AND DEATH DATE.
THERE IS NO CONFUSION ANY LONGER: THE VACCINES ARE UNSAFE AND HAVE KILLED, ON
AVERAGE, AROUND 1 PERSON PER 1,000 DOSES.

Steve Kirsch
Dec 1, 2023
1,031
Share this post

DATA FROM HEALTH NEW ZEALAND CONFIRMS THAT THE COVID VACCINES HAVE KILLED OVER
10 MILLION WORLDWIDE

kirschsubstack.com
Copy link

Facebook

Note

Other
506
Share

KEY FINDINGS

1. The vaccine is unsafe. Mortality increases dramatically after the shot. This
is true for all doses, in all 5 countries we have data on. See Medicare
death data confirms the COVID vaccines are killing people. No more doubts.
Same anomaly in all 5 countries.

2. For those under 60, the effect is harder to see because the numbers are low
(data is noisy). This doesn’t mean the vaccine is safe for those under 60;
it just means we need more data.

3. An estimated 1 death per 1,000 doses is a reasonably conservative estimation
of the excess deaths caused by the vaccine.

4. The findings are the same in four other countries we looked at: US, Israel,
Maldives, and the UK.

5. The effect is large. I’ve never seen the deaths per day after a dose slope
up after the first 21 days. It always slopes down because the fraction
killed in a year is always greater than the nominal increase in the death
rate over 1 year, even for 100 year olds.

6. The signal is so obvious to anyone like myself who knows what vaccine curves
look like that you don’t even need the fancy time-series analysis to see
this is a deadly vaccine. Just graph the number of deaths each week after
the shot is given. All the bars should be below the 4 week bar if the
vaccine is safe. There is no way to explain this chart. In general, all the
bars should be below the red line.

UPDATE

If you want to attack my analysis you can do so 5 ways:

1. Show the data is not legit

2. Show that the data can’t be used because it isn’t complete

3. Show the the analysis method (time-series cohort) is improper

4. Show that there is an execution bug (in buckets.py or the v4 spreadsheet)

5. Show that there is an error in the interpretation of the v4 visualizations

To date, nobody has found a bug in buckets.py and nobody has found a mistake in
my v4 spreadsheet! The methodology is very standard; it’s the same method used
by the UK Office of National Statistics (ONS).

The graphs speak for themselves. It doesn’t get any more clear than this. You
can vary all four independent variables, and you see the same signal.

We are done. Nobody wants to go on camera and debate me on this. They would
lose. Badly. Those curves should be relatively flat lines, not curves with a
hump. You don’t need a control group on that kind of signal. IT IS
UNPRECEDENTED.

Even self-proclaimed experts, like David Gorski were unable to find a problem in
my spreadsheet or buckets.py. If there are no errors, you have to accept the
results. The methodology is proven and accepted, the execution was flawless.

The fact that there are missing doses for a given person is immaterial. We are
always comparing dose 3 people with dose 3 people, for example.

And if the vaccine was as safe as claimed, missing doses for anyone is
immaterial since all doses are placebo shots and make no difference.

The charts from Medicare are even more extreme than these. For all safe vaccines
the line slopes down. For the COVID vaccine, the line slopes up. Nobody has ever
seen anything like this. It is unprecedented in the history of Medicare. No
counterexamples.

This is why nobody will debate me on camera on this data.

This is why no country is releasing the record-level data (RLD). If the vaccine
was safe, they’d be making the RLD widely available as well as the detailed
time-series cohort analysis. See anyone doing that? Nope. It’s because they know
the vaccines are killing people.

I even offered to take down my data if Health New Zealand showed me that my
time-series analysis is wrong and the vaccines are safe. No response. Crickets.

We now have data from 5 countries showing very troubling mortality vs. days
since dose:

1. US

2. New Zealand

3. UK

4. Maldives

5. Israel

Guess what? In every single case, the plots of deaths vs. days since dose are
inexplicable. It isn’t supposed to go upwards after 3 weeks (the HVE effect).
Everyone runs from explaining this.

There isn’t any epidemiologist with higher academic credentials than Risch who
will state that the data is flawed, the data is incomplete, the data is
insufficient to assess causality to the vaccine. There are people who are
unqualified who will make these unfounded assertions.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Today you will get to see the data that nobody wants you to see. FINALLY.

No State or country has ever released record-level public health data on any
vaccine.

Privacy is not the reason for this; the data can be easily obfuscated (which we
did on this data) so that no record entry would match that of any person, living
or dead.

The reason the data is kept secret is simple: it would expose the fact that the
COVID vaccines are unsafe, as well as all the vaccines that I have been able to
get record-level data on.

Today, thanks to a courageous whistleblower who works at the New Zealand
Ministry of Health, we have record-level information from a large population of
all ages and are making it public for the first time in history.

Here is the Rumble video announcing the leak:

There was a YouTube link as well, but YouTube censored it within minutes of
posting, just like we knew they would.

Just as you suspected, the COVID vaccines have killed millions of people
worldwide, an estimated 1 death per 1,000 doses on average in a standard
population.

And now we have the data to prove it.

THE MIT SLIDE PRESENTATION

You can read my “Is it safe?” MIT presentation slides here. I highly recommend
reading the slides and/or watching the livestream. I tried to make the slides
self-standing, but the livestream can be helpful in explaining some of the
slides.

I also periodically dump a PDF version of the presentation to my skirsch.com web
server. The PDF version is searchable and you can copy/paste text from it (such
as the access keys for the Wasabi server so you can download all the goodies).

THE MIT TALK LIVESTREAM LINKS

Here is the Twitter livestream.

Here is the Rumble livestream.

DOWNLOADING THE DATA AND TOOLS

The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including the
credentials to download all the data.

Here are the new credentials (Note: I switched to SSL on 12/10/23):

S3 compatible Server: kirsch.izt.world (uses MinIO)

> Public API keys:
> access-key= g42m54xwZS80yQpAO20Q
> secret-key= Kq77gLL47mbypnnRc0UP7sPTvrvjn6y0D5FSEK5H

You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. Trust me, there’s more
that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than Medicare).

This bucket has data from New Zealand, US, and the Maldives.

You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry Explorer or
CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.

Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then fill it out
as noted above

Make sure your destination folder is writable when you copy files from the
server.

You can also use rclone to make a local copy of the repository on your system:

mysystem% rclone config
mysystem% rclone -sync kirsch:/data-transparency /mylocal/file/destination-dir

SHORT RESPONSES TO CRITICISMS ABOUT THE DATA

I posted a link to this section of the doc on X so that people can list any
objections I need to counter that aren’t already listed.

Here is are the response points to all the criticisms I’m aware of. The tl;dr is
that all of the critiques don’t move the needle.

1. I know the leaker and got the data on Nov 9.

2. I verified the identity of the leaker and the authenticity of the data and
chain of custody.

3. There is no doubt about the authenticity. NZMH would have said the data is
fake if it was. That would immediately discredit it. But they didn’t
because that would be criminal. So they decided to distract people by going
after the leaker and calling him a misinformation spreader for leaking the
ACTUAL records.

4. The data available publicly has been anonymized. That is why they
acknowledged this and couldn’t find any matching records. Anyone who thinks
their personal data was leaked is delusional.

5. There is only one way to analyze this data definitively and that’s with a
time-series cohort analysis. This is the exact same methodology the UK ONS
used to analyze their vaccine data. The difference is our buckets are one
week long so we can see things they are trying to hide. So if you want to
dispute the analysis, you either have to show one of 3 things: that 1) our
buckets.py program has a bug or 2) that all the mortality curves are flat
or relatively flat, or 3) that the dataset is somehow compromised by
showing that one of the four graphs is nonsensical or 4) that the v4 xlsx
file has a bug in it. Nobody has done #1, and #2 is impossible. Nobody has
even attempted #3 or #4. So basically, all the “attacks” are a ridiculous
waste of time. There is a way to attack this if it is wrong, but nobody
seems capable of figuring it out. I just told you the answer. Go prove I’m
wrong using this method and I’m all ears. I did it the professional way
just like the UK did. If I made a mistake, tell me what it is. But having
each person do their own “ad hoc” analysis is not how you analyze the data.
The gold standard is time-series cohort.

6. The 1 death per 1,000 doses is consistent with other careful analyses such
as Rancourt.

7. UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris wrote "But without data on controls and
without comorbidities the most you could ever do is claim the data are
suggestive” is false. This is nearly the entire population of New Zealand.
We know the stats. The rise in mortality is correlated with each vaccine
shot. When you add the shot data together for all shots, the hump becomes
even more well defined. This is like saying that if there is a mass
shooting and 25 people died, that we can’t know if it was the bullet that
killed them because they might have died all died spontaneously right
before the bullet hit. And if the time-series cohort analysis showed that
the death rate jumped 500% exactly 10 days after the shot, would Morris
stick to his statement? He’s simply not credible. He wants to make every
excuse imaginable to avoid saying what the data shows. He should assume
it’s a normal population. And you can limit the time window of observation
to before COVID, during COVID, and after COVID and see the same signals.
Without controls, you have to work a little harder to validate there are no
significant confounders, but “scientists” such as Morris want perfect data
on everyone which never exists. He has never explained the mortality graph
from Medicare showing a 26% mortality increase in 365 where the number of
deaths per day increases monotonically. That is impossible if the vaccine
is safe. It always always slopes down. You don’t need a control group. The
slope goes the wrong way. That is a 5 alarm fire. It’s amazing he doesn’t
know this.

8. There is no rebuttal from anyone in the medical community showing:

1. buckets.py has an error

2. the analysis in the v4 spreadsheet has an error

3. a credible excess death estimate under 100 deaths per 100K doses based
on the data (they all refuse to show us their calculation)

4. any epidemiologist with a higher h-index than Risch claiming that this
data could possibly be consistent with a safe vaccine.

5. a more accurate way to calculate the baseline that is based on other
similar data.

6. any evidence that my most “damaging curve” in my MIT presentation is
wrong (a 50% increase in deaths per day from baseline after 180 days).
Why is nobody touching that?? I don’t get it. If there is one thing to
disprove, start with the strongest point.

9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this which is consistent with my
analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet clearly shows it is those over 60
seeing the excess mortality which precisely matches the public data:

10. There are 12M doses in New Zealand. The data drop is only for the “Pay per
dose” (PPD) program in NZ which is 4M of the 12M records. Whether you got
PPD or not is pretty random.

11. What cohort does this PPD programme cover? Answer: it’s completely random.
It is not age biased or biased to any demographic. If you can prove I’m
wrong, show me your data.

12. The reason the avg age of death is higher than average is because the older
you are, the more the vaccine killed you. Duh.

13. KiwiCraig74 wrote: “Yes, these were mobile units used to give vaccinations
to people in rest homes, which is where people generally are when they
don't have long left. Average term of residence is only 20 months, so many
die within his 10 months (vaccine or no vaccine).” This is just complete
bullshit. There are 895,500,935 man days in people under 60 in the data.
There are a total of 1,348,440,643 man days in the full data.

14. There is a disproportionate amount of records for the doses, i.e., they are
not in direct proportion to the total number of each dose, e.g., they are
not 33% of each dose. Some doses are over-represented, some are under
represented.

15. Many people will not have all their doses in this database, e.g., there may
just be dose 3 data for someone.

16. The fact that the sampling was uneven doesn’t matter if you analyze it the
way I did. The fact that doses are missing is also irrelevant. These are
gaslighting arguments made by people who are incompetent to analyze this
data.

17. The data shows a mortality hump that peaks around 6 months after a dose is
given.

18. If you limit the time period to before COVID, during COVID death wave (from
April 1 to August 1, 2022) and after the wave, you find the same response
curve. So it wasn’t COVID. People who claim that are misinformed and claim
it without evidence.

19. Let’s take a simple example. From OWID, we know there were no COVID deaths
from Aug 1, 2022 to Nov 1, 2022 in New Zealand. From our spreadsheet we see
the average deaths for everyone during that time:

So now lets look at that same period of time, except let’s look relative to
the shot administration time

The dots aren’t supposed to go above 1059 (which is the highest number from
the spreadsheet entries above).

20. Nobody will debate me on this. I offered to debate the NZMH epidemiologists
about the cohort time-series analysis I did and they don’t want to
challenge me for some reason. I can’t figure it out. They should CRUSH me
if the data shows the vaccines are safe.

21. The NZMH should be releasing the full 12M record dataset to remove all
doubt and prove to the world the vaccines are safe. They don’t want to do
that. Nobody wants to do that. Nobody in the ##$#$#% world wants to do
that. Can you figure out why? Use your brain folks!

22. I offered to bet anyone $1M on the same terms as my bet with Saar Wilf that
the NZ data is legit and it shows the vaccines increase risk of death.
Nobody seems interested in taking my money which means all of them have no
confidence whatsoever in their criticisms.

23. The NZMH whisteblower, Oracle database admin Barry Young, is a hero. He
knew he would risk his life and could spend the rest of his life in jail,
but he made the courageous move to expose the data for all to see. This is
a highly commendable act of public service. He basically threw the rest of
his life away in order to save the lives of others. Why else do you think
he would do that? Nobody can explain it.

24. They tried to give this to lawmakers but nobody would meet with them.

25. No New Zealand lawmaker is calling for an independent investigation. They
all want to make Barry into the fall guy. Why not have a worldwide panel of
top epidemiologists analyze the record-level data? We know why… Barry was
right.

26. The NZMH has never released the time-series cohort analysis showing the
vaccines are safe. They have never released the record level data. Their
goal is to keep the data hidden for as long as possible so that they kill
as many people as possible before they are caught. The leadership of NZMH
are the people who should be arrested.

27. Professor Norman Fenton retracted his remarks about deaths being
oversampled after I pointed out to him that there is nothing in the data
that supports that. See his new article. He doesn’t dispute my analysis
(which ignores the hot lot analysis).

28. Igor Chudov wrote a critical article but now is relooking at the data after
I talked to him and explained to him how his original article is wrong.

29. Jikkyleaks analysis is amazing crude. That’s not the way to analyze this
data. I like Jikky but he’s wrong. Once again, nobody would analyze the
data that way. There is a right way and a wrong way. The UK ONS got it
right. Let’s stick to that way. NOBODY SEEMS TO WANT TO DO IT THE RIGHT
WAY. They all want to use their own custom made analysis technique that
they create on the seat of their pants, rather than the right way to do
that. Why is that?

30. UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris claims you can’t find a signal here but all
attempts for a public recorded discussion of the data were refused. He
apparently hasn’t even seen my MIT presentation which is a pre-requisite if
you are serious about understanding this data. He shoots first without
taking the time to listen to what is being presented. Morris isn’t an
honest actor. Someone looking to find the truth would be calling for every
public health agency to release the record level data. Morris has never
made any such call. He doesn’t want the truth exposed. I asked him to
explain just one slide in my MIT slide deck (the most devasting slide in
the deck), and he hadn’t seen it before which is proof he didn’t even
listen to my presentation or even view the slides. Instead of explaining
the Medicare data, Morris does his standard “switch the topic” technique to
avoid answering a simple question. Click the link and scroll up to see the
original question which nobody can answer:

31. Morris has had the records in his hands for about 1 week before my MIT
talk. He has not published any blog post explaining how this evidence is
consistent with a safe vaccine. When I asked him, “So Jeffrey, what exactly
would an “unsafe” vaccine look like, he said he doesn’t play games like
that. Morris never saw a vaccine that is “unsafe.” In his eyes, no matter
how many people die, the vaccine is safe and all safety signals are caused
by confounders that he cannot quantify. This is all handwaving analysis to
make your point. Where is his blog on this data? I’ll tear it apart inch by
inch and show how corrupt he is.

32. None of these people who claim to critique this will do a live discussion
with me. No offers on the thread at all. If you want to debate me, simply
post your argument and follow me, and say you want a debate. Everyone seems
scared to do this, including KiwiCraig74.

33. The official NZ death records show around 10,000 excess deaths since the
vaccines rolled out. This is comparable to the number predicted from the
vaccine data (1 excess death per 1,000 doses).

MIRROR SITES

Do not mirror my data unless you have a bulletproof hosting provider.

MEGA AND WASABI WILL REMOVE YOUR ACCESS WITHOUT CONTACTING YOU FOR AN
EXPLANATION. THEY SHOOT FIRST, ASK QUESTIONS LATER. KEVIN MCKERNAN LOST MAN
YEARS OF WORK BECAUSE OF THIS.

Most hosting providers (such as MEGA) will close your entire account without
notice or warning if they are contacted by the NZ Ministry of Health. They will
not reach out to you. They will believe the accuser and side with the accuser.

WHAT YOU WILL FIND

1. The data: All the data in the data-transparency bucket is sanitized. Any
matches to actual records is completely accidental. The data was sanitized
in a way that preserves the statistics. We ran the bucket analysis on the
original and obfuscated data and got nearly identical results. There is no
reason any health authority couldn’t do the same thing we did.

2. The tools: We’ll give you our time-series cohort analysis software. This is
the software that you’ll never get your State epidemiologist to use. Now,
armed with record-level data, you can do your own analysis. We’ve made it
super easy to use. When done, paste the output file into our v4 analysis
.xlsx spreadsheet and you’ll see instantly whether the vaccine is safe or
not.

3. The analysis documents: You’ll find annotated spreadsheets as well as word
documents.

4. The description of the data: You’ll find documents describing the dataset
(size, dates, average ages in each cohort, what the authorities claim, etc.

I encourage you to explore. Everything is “legal” in that jurisdiction. So
you’ll see the full times of people who died in the Maldives, for example. In
other places, the names are omitted.

INTRODUCTION

I was provided the data on November 8, 2023 when it was uploaded to my Wasabi
file server.

I was asked by the whistleblower to keep the data confidential until November 30
in order to give the whistleblower time to work out the logistics of how the
data would be made public.

I honored my commitment and only shared it with a handful of colleagues
including Norman Fenton and his associates in the UK with the whistleblower’s
consent.

The data from New Zealand is not perfect; it is not a complete sample. For
example, for some people, the first record in the database is Dose #3. Also,
only vaccinated people are in the database.

But, by using a cohort time-series analysis, it doesn’t matter. There is no
possible way that this data is consistent with a safe vaccine. I estimated that
the vaccine killed, on average, about 1 person per 1,000 doses. That means an
estimated 675,000 Americans were killed by the COVID vaccines.

We have confirmation of the analysis from the US Medicare data thanks to another
whistleblower.

The story of the data can be found in my presentation which has a link to the
Wasabi server and access credentials, as well as how to download the free Wasabi
File Explorers for PC and Mac. There is a large amount of data and analysis
uploaded to the servers.

The cohort time-series analysis takes about 2 hours to run on the data. We’ve
included the output files so you can start from that.

Analyzing the data takes about 5 minutes using the v4 spreadsheet in the
analysis directory. Anyone can do it. You just plug in numbers to vary the
parameters to look at anything you want to investigate. It has 8 visualizations:
4 main graphs (one for each independent variable) and 4 below each graph showing
the number of deaths so you can use that to judge the reliability of the data
points in the graph above.

Be sure to read the entire presentation to understand how to interpret the data.

PAPERS ABOUT THE DATA

Papers will be coming out from various authors over the coming weeks. See this
article which I will update over time.

SUMMARY OF WHAT WE FOUND

Record level vaccination-date/death data obtained from a whistleblower in the
New Zealand Ministry of Health was analyzed using a standard time-series cohort
analysis. The results remained consistent even after varying all four of the key
independent variables (observation time window, days after shot, age, and dose
number). The only way that can happen is if the COVID vaccines significantly
increased mortality for those aged 60 and older, the very population that the
vaccine was supposed to help. All five Bradford Hill causality criteria are
satisfied. From this data, we can accurately estimate that overall, the mRNA
vaccines led to the premature death of more than 1 person per 1,000 doses on
average over all doses.

This estimate is supported by COVID death data from Medicare obtained from
another whistleblower. The data from Medicare was stunning: the number of people
who died rose monotonically for those who got shot in 2021 or 2022. My
whistleblower inside HHS had never seen anything like that before. It was a
perfectly straight line sloping upwards for 365 days since the dose was given. A
safe vaccine would see a decline in deaths by 4% to 5% after 1 year from the
shot. The COVID vaccines had a 26% mortality increase, a net difference of 30%.
This makes the COVID vaccine a competitor to heart disease as the leading cause
of death among the elderly (which kills 20% of people per year).

THE COVID VACCINES ARE THE DEADLIEST VACCINE OF ALL TIME, KILLING AN ESTIMATED
13 MILLION PEOPLE WORLDWIDE.

The precautionary principle of medicine requires that a vaccine which results in
such a large net increase in all-cause mortality should be immediately revoked
worldwide unless there is a more likely explanation for this “gold-standard”
data. Nobody has come forward with a better explanation that fits all the data.
In fact, nobody on the other side even wants to see this data: the FDA, CDC,
Moderna, and Pfizer all refused to look at it. How is that responsible? That is
reprehensible.

Researchers could have discovered the harms of these vaccines years earlier if
any of the world’s health authorities released comparable record-level data to
that released here. It is baffling to us why the medical community who is sworn
to do no harm is not insisting on seeing any record-level data before
recommending the use of any vaccine to their patients. It is the record-level
data that is key to understanding whether a vaccine is safe or not. This is
always hidden from public view.

Hidden from view?!?!

Clinical outcomes are never improved by keeping public health data hidden from
public view. Yet every health authority in the world has kept this critical
record-level safety data hidden from view.

And, to our knowledge, only one authority, the UK Office of National Statistics,
had supplied even the most basic time-series analysis for a limited amount of
time. The UK time-series analysis confirms the monotonic increase in mortality
after each shot is given. But the UK ONS got to pick the bucket sizes whereas
when we do the analysis, we have buckets for every week so we can see exactly
what is going on. They can’t. And the ONS stopped responding to me when I asked
to see the record-level data.

Other health authorities apparently refused to analyze their own data themselves
to look for any safety signals which we found in abundance just minutes after
receiving the data. After we received this data and analyzed this, we reached
out to a number of health authorities in the US in Florida, California, and at
the CDC and FDA. They all ignored the request to examine the data I obtained or
look at their own data. This is the first time in history that vaccination-death
record-level data has been made available to the public. And now we know why.

In addition, FOIA requests to the California Department of Public Health showed
that they never analyzed their own data. There were no documents showing that
they ever looked for any safety signals. They simply trusted the CDC even though
the CDC doesn’t have any vaccine record level data, so it is IMPOSSIBLE for the
CDC to do the proper safety analysis.

Finally, the safety signals are limited to those 60 and over simply because
there wasn’t enough data to make a firm determination for people under 60; the
data was simply too noisy because we were only given 4M of the 12M records in
New Zealand.

However, since the vaccine provides no benefits whatsoever for infection,
hospitalization, or death, there is no reason for anyone in the world to take
these vaccines. See the presentation for details.

In any sane world, the COVID vaccines would be immediately halted and inquiries
should begin as to why no health authority in the world did a thorough cohort
time-series analysis on the data which would have uncovered the safety signal
very early in the deployment. Are they all corrupt? Or are they all incompetent?
Or both?

CAN MODERNA SURVIVE THIS? WHY WOULD ANYONE BUY THEIR STOCK?

These results have implications for Moderna stock as the failure of their
underlying technology casts serious doubt on their viability as a going concern.
Even if governments continue to buy their products, the breach of the public
trust and the unwillingness of the company to look at the record-level data
shows that the company is more interested in making a profit than ensuring the
safety of their customers. A head in the sand approach to safety is despicable.

Pfizer is no different. Both companies were offered an opportunity to view this
safety data and they all refused. So did the FDA and CDC. The offer was made by
a respected journalist in the medical new community, not by me.

WHAT DID PROFESSOR NORMAN FENTON SAY ABOUT THIS NEW DATA?

Nobody should take my word on this. Those are my opinions based on examination
of the data.

Anyone can analyze this data. Come to your own conclusions.

Finally, here is what famed British Mathematician Professor Norman Fenton said,
“This confirms what we also saw in the most recent ONS data once.

> Whatever uncertainty there may be in the younger age groups there is now no
> doubt the vaccine is increasing the mortality rate in older people.”

I agree. In spades. I’d bet my life on it.

Yale epidemiologist Professor Harvey Risch had this to say:

> “I think that you've made a very strong case that the Covid genetic vaccines
> are associated with appreciably increased mortality rates for 6-12 months
> after each dose. This is particularly compelling in people over age 65. I am
> not aware of actual evidence that the increased post-vaccine mortality that
> you've shown has a different cause.”

The English translation of what he wrote is “the vaccines are killing people,”
but scientists aren’t allowed to be blunt so they have to qualify everything
they say.

THIS IS HOW TODAY’S “SCIENTISTS” COME TO CONCLUSIONS

If there was a mass shooting and everyone died, a scientist would want to have a
control group and complete medical histories of each person (including a list of
comorbidities) and then want to do a Cox proportional hazards analysis before
concluding that the gunman could be the cause of death of these people. Without
a control group, the scientist would be unable to say whether the shooting
actually caused the deaths.

NOBODY WITH RESPECTABLE CREDENTIALS WANTS TO DEFEND THE VACCINE AS BEING SAFE

I offered to engage in a public recorded debate with anyone who thinks we got it
wrong. Nobody was willing to do that to date, although Professor Jovo Vogelstein
offered to give it a try to play devil’s advocate.

If you think we got it wrong, I have a $500K bet pending with Saar Wilf in
Israel. I’d love to increase the stakes on that bet. Any takers?

SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST NEVER GOING TO FIGURE THIS OUT

UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris has had the data for a while. He doesn’t agree
with our analysis (as expected). But when I asked him to explain the Medicare
data where the mortality monotonically increases every day for 365 days
straight, he said he refused to speculate. Professor Morris never is able to see
a vaccine that is unsafe. I proposed all sorts of unsafe hypotheses to him, and
he said none of them were convincing. So in his mind, no matter which way the
deaths go, even if they go sky high after the vaccine is given, you cannot tell
if a vaccine is safe or not; there will always be a confounder that he will
find. And he’ll always insist on getting additional data that is never
available, so he’ll argue that all data, no matter how strong, is not good
enough.

NEARLY HALF OF AMERICA HAS ALREADY FIGURED OUT THE COVID VACCINES ARE NOT SAFE;
THEY WANT TO SUE THE DRUG COMPANIES!

Fortunately most people figure it out pretty quickly. Did you know that 42% of
Americans would join a class action lawsuit against the COVID vax makers if they
were allowed under law to do so? That is an unprecedented level of customer
dissatisfaction. This is why I shorted Moderna stock. That is not a sustainable
business. The markets will eventually figure this out.

THEIR ATTEMPTS TO GASLIGHT YOU

Some people will try to convince you that the data isn’t complete and is
confounded for that reason. That’s bullshit. If it’s a safe vaccine, you can be
missing 99% of the shot data and still get the right answer. Doses don’t matter;
a safe vaccine is like a saline shot: they cause no impact.

They won’t get away with stupid arguments like that with me. That’s why they
won’t debate me.

CONSIDER SUPPORTING MY WORK WITH A PAID SUBSCRIPTION

I only have time to do this work because this is my day job.

If you liked this article and want to keep supporting my work, and are not
already a paid subscriber, please consider becoming a paid subscriber for just
$50/yr or $5/month.

Your subscription fee supports the critical work that Substack has done in
providing a free-speech platform, and also provides the funds needed to continue
this work to expose the fraud and save lives.

HAVING TROUBLE? USE THE CONTACT ME LINK

You can get support here using the Contact Me link.

SUMMARY

It’s over. They’ve lost. The vaccines are unsafe. This data is the nail in the
coffin. Gold standard, official records. There is no better ground truth than
this. There is no comparable ground-truth data showing the vaccines are safe.
Zero. There can be only one right answer.

If you think the vaccines are safe, accept my bet, debate me publicly, or
release the record level data in your state. Nobody will do any of those things
it seems.

Sooner or later top epidemiologists will weigh in on this data.

Now we’ll see just how broken science is if the world’s top epidemiologists
cannot agree that the vaccines are unsafe. For example, will John Ioannidis
weigh in? Or will he remain silent? Will Martin Kulldorff say anything? Or will
he also ignore this data?

In the meantime, the medical community and mainstream media will keep
recommending the jabs as if nothing has happened. They should be ashamed of
themselves.

1,031 Likes
·
126 Restacks
1,031
Share this post

DATA FROM HEALTH NEW ZEALAND CONFIRMS THAT THE COVID VACCINES HAVE KILLED OVER
10 MILLION WORLDWIDE

kirschsubstack.com
Copy link

Facebook

Note

Other
506
Share
506 Comments

Share this discussion

DATA FROM HEALTH NEW ZEALAND CONFIRMS THAT THE COVID VACCINES HAVE KILLED OVER
10 MILLION WORLDWIDE

kirschsubstack.com
Copy link

Facebook

Note

Other
Don
17 hrs ago·edited 17 hrs ago

" 19. Let’s take a simple example. From OWID, we know there were no COVID deaths
from Aug 1, 2022 to Nov 1, 2022 in New Zealand. From our spreadsheet we see the
average deaths for everyone during that time: ...."

there seems to be 2 covid deaths in New Zealand:

Sept 4, 2021.

Oct 8, 2021

------------------------------------------

however compared to the other deaths, i would guess that i would say it is
basically a zero percentage.

however between Aug 1, 2022 to Nov 1, 2022 there are all sorts of covid
deaths...

890 plus or minus covid deaths according to:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/new-zealand/

Expand full comment
Like
Reply
Share

moando
Dec 12

So Dr. Shiva isn't good with the NZ data. Data or not, THIS HAS TO STOP!

https://www.infowars.com/posts/new-vaccine-mandates-brazil-is-force-vaccinating-babies-global-genocide-continues/

Expand full comment
Like
Reply
Share

504 more comments...
Top
New
Community

The FAA has very quietly tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer
normal. We should be concerned. Very concerned.
After the vaccine rolled out, the FAA secretly widened the EKG parameter range
for pilots so they wouldn't be grounded. It looks like the vax gave at…
Jan 17 •
Steve Kirsch

2,330
Share this post

THE FAA HAS VERY QUIETLY TACITLY ADMITTED THAT THE EKGS OF PILOTS ARE NO LONGER
NORMAL. WE SHOULD BE CONCERNED. VERY CONCERNED.

kirschsubstack.com
Copy link

Facebook

Note

Other
1,322

Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being
vaccinated were killed by the vaccine
The vaccine was implicated in 93% of the deaths in the patients they examined.
What's troubling is the coroner didn't implicate the vaccine in any of…
Dec 29, 2021 •
Steve Kirsch

2,522
Share this post

BHAKDI/BURKHARDT PATHOLOGY RESULTS SHOW 93% OF PEOPLE WHO DIED AFTER BEING
VACCINATED WERE KILLED BY THE VACCINE

kirschsubstack.com
Copy link

Facebook

Note

Other
1,388

New studies show that the COVID vaccines damage your immune system, likely
permanently
The vaccines are making it more likely you'll be infected with Omicron 90 days
after you are fully vaccinated. To keep vaccine effectiveness high…
Dec 25, 2021 •
Steve Kirsch

1,902
Share this post

NEW STUDIES SHOW THAT THE COVID VACCINES DAMAGE YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM, LIKELY
PERMANENTLY

kirschsubstack.com
Copy link

Facebook

Note

Other
875
See all

Ready for more?

CREATE YOUR PROFILE

Name (Required)HandleBio Subscribe to the newsletter

undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Save & Post Comment

ONLY PAID SUBSCRIBERS CAN COMMENT ON THIS POST

Subscribe
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

CHECK YOUR EMAIL

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please turn on JavaScript or
unblock scripts

kirschsubstack.com Open in urlscan Pro 2606:4700:4400::6812:2857 Public Scan

Form analysis 5 forms found in the DOM

POST /api/v1/free?nojs=true

POST

POST /api/v1/free?nojs=true

POST /api/v1/user/profile

Text Content

kirschsubstack.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:4400::6812:2857 Public Scan

Form analysis
5 forms found in the DOM