www.bananagrammer.com Open in urlscan Pro
2a00:1450:4001:810::2013  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

http://www.bananagrammer.com/search

<form action="http://www.bananagrammer.com/search" class="gsc-search-box" target="_top">
  <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="gsc-search-box">
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td class="gsc-input">
          <input autocomplete="off" class="gsc-input" name="q" size="10" title="search" type="text" value="">
        </td>
        <td class="gsc-search-button">
          <input class="gsc-search-button" title="search" type="submit" value="Search">
        </td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</form>

Text Content

skip to main | skip to sidebar
 


A blog for fans of Bananagrams, word games, puzzles, and amazing things



SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2015


A. A. MILNE ON PLAYING GAMES


If you've ever hosted or attend a board games party, you might enjoy this essay
by A. A. Milne about playing parlor games on a rainy day:

> For a Wet Afternoon
> 
> Let us consider something seasonable; let us consider indoor games for a
> moment.
> 
> And by indoor games I do not mean anything so serious as bridge and billiards,
> nor anything so commercial as vingt-et-un with fish counters, nor anything so
> strenuous as "bumps." The games I mean are those jolly, sociable ones in which
> everybody in the house can join with an equal chance of distinction, those
> friendly games which are played with laughter round a fire what time the
> blizzards rattle against the window-pane.
> 
> These games may be divided broadly into two classes; namely, paper games and
> guessing games. The initial disadvantage of the paper game is that pencils
> have to be found for everybody; generally a difficult business. Once they are
> found, there is no further trouble until the game is over, when the pencils
> have to be collected from everybody; generally an impossible business. If you
> are a guest in the house, insist upon a paper game, for it gives you a chance
> of acquiring a pencil; if you are the host, consider carefully whether you
> would not rather play a guessing game.
> 
> But the guessing game has one great disadvantage too. It demands periodically
> that a member of the company should go out by himself into the hall and wait
> there patiently until his companions have "thought of something." (It may be
> supposed that he, too, is thinking of something in the cold hall, but perhaps
> not liking to say it.) However careful the players are, unpleasantness is
> bound to arise sometimes over this preliminary stage of the game. I knew of
> one case where the people in the room forgot all about the lady waiting in the
> hall and began to tell each other ghost stories. The lights were turned out,
> and sitting round the flickering fire the most imaginative members of the
> household thrilled their hearers with ghostly tales of the dead. Suddenly, in
> the middle of the story of Torfrida of the Towers—a lady who had strangled her
> children, and ever afterwards haunted the battlements, headless, and in a
> night- gown—the door opened softly, and Miss Robinson entered to ask how much
> longer they would be. Miss Robinson was wearing a white frock, and the effect
> of her entry was tremendous. I remember, too, another evening when we were
> playing "proverbs." William, who had gone outside, was noted for his skill at
> the game, and we were determined to give him something difficult; something
> which hadn't a camel or a glass house or a stable door in it. After some
> discussion a member of the company suggested a proverb from the Persian, as he
> alleged. It went something like this: "A wise man is kind to his dog, but a
> poor man riseth early in the morning." We took his word for it, and, feeling
> certain that William would never guess, called him to come in.
> 
> Unfortunately William, who is a trifle absentminded, had gone to bed.
> 
> To avoid accidents of this nature it is better to play "clumps," a guessing
> game in which the procedure is slightly varied. In "clumps" two people go into
> the hall and think of something, while the rest remain before the fire. Thus,
> however long the interval of waiting, all are happy; for the people inside can
> tell each other stories (or, as a last resort, play some other game) and the
> two outside are presumably amusing themselves in arranging something very
> difficult. Personally I adore clumps; not only for this reason, but because of
> its revelation of hidden talent. There may be a dozen persons in each clump,
> and in theory every one of the dozen is supposed to take a hand in the cross-
> examination, but in practice it is always one person who extracts the
> information required by a cataract of searching questions. Always one person
> and generally a girl. I love to see her coming out of her shell. She has
> excelled at none of the outdoor games perhaps; she has spoken hardly a word at
> meals. In our little company she has scarcely seemed to count. But suddenly
> she awakes into life. Clumps is the family game at home; she has been brought
> up on it. In a moment she discovers herself as our natural leader, a leader
> whom we follow humbly. And however we may spend the rest of our time together,
> the effect of her short hour's triumph will not wholly wear away. She is now
> established.
> 
> But the paper games will always be most popular, and once you are over the
> difficulty of the pencils you may play them for hours without wearying. But of
> course you must play the amusing ones and not the dull ones. The most common
> paper game of all, that of making small words out of a big one, has nothing to
> recommend it; for there can be no possible amusement in hearing somebody else
> read out "but," "bat," "bet," "bin," "ben," and so forth, riot even if you
> spend half an hour discussing whether "ben" is really a word. On the other
> hand your game, however amusing, ought to have some finality about it; a game
> is not really a game unless somebody can win it. For this reason I cannot
> wholly approve "telegrams." To concoct a telegram whose words begin with
> certain selected letters of the alphabet, say the first ten, is to amuse
> yourself anyhow and possibly your friends; whether you say, "Am bringing camel
> down early Friday. Got hump. Inform Jamrach"; or, "Afraid better cancel dinner
> engagement. Fred got horrid indigestion.—JANE." But it is impossible to
> declare yourself certainly the winner. Fortunately, however, there are games
> which combine amusement with a definite result; games in which the others can
> be funny while you can get the prize—or, if you prefer it, the other way
> about.
> 
> When I began to write this, the rain was streaming against the window-panes.
> It is now quite fine. This, you will notice, often happens when you decide to
> play indoor games on a wet afternoon. Just as you have found the pencils, the
> sun comes out.


Posted by Surly Teabag Comments
Labels: delightful, essays, games



WEDNESDAY, JUNE 11, 2014


MORE REASONS THAT YOUR DICTIONARY IS INADEQUATE


James Somers, writer of many fine stimulating blog posts and a nice recent
profile of Douglas Hofstadter (titled "The Man Who Would Teach Machines to
Think"), has published a long blog post on what makes a good dictionary. He
addresses the importance of a proper dictionary to a writer who wants to write
well, and he closes with instructions on how to install such a dictionary on all
your electronic devices.


Here is his "You’re probably using the wrong dictionary".


Posted by Surly Teabag Comments
Labels: dictionaries, essays, how to



SUNDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2013


THE AMAZING ENABLE WORD-LIST PROJECT


While looking for a good word list to use for a project that I am working on, I
discovered ENABLE (which stands for Enhanced North American Benchmark LEexicon),
a word list that seems to have been compiled mainly by Alan Beale (with some
help from Mendel Cooper) in order to create a reference that can be used when
playing word games. Since it is an open and freely available list, it has served
as the basis for the word lists used in many games, such as Words with Friends.
What distinguishes this word list from the many others out there is how
thoroughly its creation has been documented in the many files in the ENABLE
package and its supplemental archive.

For this reason, many of the disadvantages of the Scrabble Tournament Word List
can be eliminated. For instance, as the compilers themselves note:

> In contrast to other word lists, the ENABLE list has not been crippled by
> being limited to words under an arbitrary length. The ENABLE list is eminently
> suitable for most word games, such as Anagrams and Clabbers, and for crossword
> puzzle solving, rather than just for Scrabble. A great deal of research has
> gone into removing this limitation, however the list is much the better for
> it.

Another critique of the Scrabble Word Lists and Dictionaries is that they are
carrying around many words that were in dictionaries back in the 1970s but have
long since disappeared from both usage and lexicons. The ENABLE supplement
includes a list of 9,768 stale words (which it defines as words that appear in
the Scrabble Tournament Word List but not in modern dictionaries).

Most of these stale words (like AXAL (an obsolete form of "axial") and WHERVE
("a round piece of wood put on a spindle to receive the thread")) were words I
had never heard of and therefore had no problem eliminating from the word list
for my project. There were also some words that I thought needed to be retained
based on being in common usage including SPELUNK/SPELUNKED/SPELUNKING (which,
according to the Google Books Ngram Viewer, has been used with increasing
frequency since about the 1940s) and UPSTANDING (which peaked in popularity in
the 1920s, reached a local minimum around 1970, but has been on the upswing
since 1990).

This is only a sampling of what makes ENABLE so useful. Amateur lexicographers
and other interested parties can find and download the whole ENABLE package
through this page.


Posted by Surly Teabag Comments
Labels: dictionaries, words



MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2013


A SESQUIPEDALIANIST BOGGLE PUZZLE


During my analysis of the effects of playing Boggle with different letter
distributions, I simulated more than 50,000 games of standard 4-by-4 Boggle. One
statistic that I was tracking was the longest word found across each of the data
sets. Invariably, each data set got stuck at a maximum word length of 11
letters. (In the Big Boggle simulations, the solver found words as long as 13
letters.) I was really hoping for something longer, but rather than keep running
simulations until I finally find some 12-letter word and have it turn out to be
something disappointing, like BORINGNESSES, I've decided to embed one 16-letter
word in a Boggle grid and present it below as a puzzle for your solving
pleasure.

Good luck!





Posted by Surly Teabag Comments
Labels: boggle, puzzles



THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2013


THE BOGGLE CUBE REDESIGN AND ITS EFFECT ON THE DIFFICULTY OF BOGGLE


I wanted to buy a copy of Boggle. This seemingly simple mission was complicated
by the facts that a) there are different kinds of Boggle out there and b) I like
to make things complicated.

If you exclude variations such as Big Boggle [affiliate link] and the recently
introduced 6-by-6 Super Big Boggle [affiliate link] and just limit yourself to
the original 4-by-4 Boggle configuration, there are three principle versions of
Boggle:

1) Boggle Reinvention (now sold as just "Boggle") - While the new sealed case
design and the integrated timer mean that you don't need to worry about losing
any of the pieces, there are reports that it is possible for two dice to become
jammed together in such a way that it is essentially impossible to separate them
without opening up the case and destroying the game. In my opinion, Boggle
should not be a game that can break.

2) Plain old Boggle, made from about 1976 to 1986 (which I will call "classic
Boggle").

3) The version of Boggle sold from 1987 to ~2008 - essentially the same as
classic Boggle except that the letter distribution on the cubes was completely
redesigned. I'll call this "New Boggle".

Below, you can see a side-by-side comparison of the classic and new sets of
Boggle dice.

Classic
Boggle Dice New
Boggle Dice AACIOTAAEEGN ABILTYABBJOO ABJMOQuACHOPS ACDEMPAFFKPS ACELRSAOOTTW
ADENVZCIMOTU AHMORSDEILRX BIFORXDELRVY DENOSWDISTTY DKNOTUEEGHNW EEFHIYEEINSU
EGKLUYEHRTVW EGINTVEIOSST EHINPSELRTTY ELPSTUHIMNUQu GILRUWHLNNRZ

To help visualize the differences between these distributions, I sorted the
classic letter distribution by number of letters (shown on the left below) and
used that order to sort the new letter distribution (shown on the right).


<= Classic New =====>
EEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEE
  AAAAAAAA AAAAAA
   IIIIIII IIIIII
    OOOOOO OOOOOOO
     LLLLL LLLL
     NNNNN NNNNNN
     SSSSS SSSSSS
     TTTTT TTTTTTTTT
      DDDD DDD
      RRRR RRRRR
      UUUU UUU
       BBB BB
       CCC CC
       GGG GG
       HHH HHHHH
       MMM MM
       PPP PP
       YYY YYY
        FF FF
        KK K
        VV VV
        WW WWW
         J J
         Q Q
         X X
         Z Z


In some ways (such as increasing the number of Ts and Hs), the new distribution
is closer to the letter frequency in English words, but that motive alone would
not explain why the number of As was decreased and the number of Os was
increased. It has been suggested that this change was designed to reduce the
frequency of harder letters (like K and G) and make finding words easier.

One other interesting property of the new set of dice is that since it
concentrates certain letters all on the same die, it is never possible to make
words that combine F and K (like FAKE, FORK, SKIFF,...) or words that combine B
and J (JOB, JAB, BANJO,...). It is also not possible to make words with three Ps
(like PINEAPPLE) or two Ks (like SKOOKUM, which is a slang term in the Pacific
Northwest, derived from the Chinook language, and having multiple meanings: as
an adjective it refers to something that is massive or powerful or reliable or
simply really cool; as a noun, it can refer to an evil spirit or demon or a
monster somewhat like Bigfoot or Sasquatch; it is pronounced /SKOO kum/).

So does this change in letter distribution have an effect on the game? To find
out, I ran some simulated Boggle games, generating random boards with each set
of dice and using a Boggle solver (written by GitHub user cespare) to determine
the number of words in each board, the resulting Boggle score, and the longest
word in each grid.

[The default word list used by the Boggle solver only contains words that are 15
letters long or shorter. While it's highly unlikely to find a random 4-by-4
Boggle board containing a 16-letter word, I decided to augment the word list to
include 16-letter words, as well as the 17-letter words that could be made with
the Qu cube (like QUATTUORDECILLION [which means 1045 in the U.S. and 1084 in
Britain] and SESQUIPEDALIANISM).]

Dice setAverage 
# of wordsAverage 
Boggle
scoreAverage
length of
longest word New Boggle~104~1506.8 Classic Boggle~93~1286.6

The results show that there are about 12% more words to be found in a New Boggle
board. These results are from simulating 10,000 boards for each set of dice, so
the numbers in the table may be off by a few percent.

To try to give a little more insight into the difference between these versions
of the game, I ran simulations for a New Boggle board in which a randomly chosen
cube from a corner of the board was removed. The corresponding results,

Dice setAverage 
# of wordsAverage 
Boggle
scoreAverage
length of
longest word New Boggle
w/o one
corner cube~92~1316.6

are really close to the classic Boggle results, suggesting that if you want to
make your New Boggle game about as hard as a classic Boggle game, you can just
remove a die from the corner of the board before hunkering down to find words.

Out of curiosity, I also ran simulations for 5-by-5 Big Boggle, using the
requirement that words be at least four letters long (unlike the three-letter
limit in regular Boggle) and using the Big Boggle scoring system, which yielded
these results:

Dice setAverage 
# of wordsAverage 
Big
Boggle
scoreAverage
length of
longest word Big Boggle~190~3958.3

(For comparison with 4-by-4 Boggle, if you include the three-letter words that
are in Big Boggle boards, the average number of words increases to about 260.)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, these calculations only confirmed what I already knew: the older
version of the game is harder and is the one for me. I bought a copy of classic
Boggle from eBay. The dice are made of wood rather than plastic. The timer has
sand in it and doesn't make some noise to tell me when time is up. Succinctly, I
think it is skookum.



Posted by Surly Teabag Comments
Labels: boggle, letter distributions, word games



SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2013


THE MOST DIFFICULT BANANAGRAMS CHALLENGE I'VE ENCOUNTERED


Recently, I played a few rounds of Bananagrams. At the beginning of the last
game, I flipped over my tiles and only had three vowels. As I continued to peel
mostly consonants, I realized that the optimum strategy was probably to dump
consonants until I obtained a more reasonable consonant-to-vowel ratio, but I
wanted the challenge of trying to finish the game without dumping tiles. But by
the end of the game, the situation had not improved: I had 23 consonants and 6
vowels. Furthermore, I also had a Q (with no U), an X, and a Z. I was nowhere
close to finishing my grid by the time someone else won.

Here was the set of tiles that I had at the end:





ADEEEGGHKLLMNNNNOQRRRRRSTVXYZ



I decided to save the tiles and try to work out a solution later. I spent some
time working on this problem on two consecutive nights. The second night I found
a solution that used all the letters but one N, but that seemed to be the best
that was possible.

Finally, several days later, I found a true solution. It's possible to vary some
of the peripheral words and get alternate solutions, but there is a core
structure that I have not been able to alter without rendering the grid
uncompletable.

This puzzle can be solved without using any two-letter words or any vowelless
words. (I think that violating these constraints would make the puzzle too
easy.)

I leave this as a challenge. I will post a solution at some point in the future.


Posted by Surly Teabag Comments




TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2012


FUN WITH COLLECTIVE NOUNS


In England in the Middle Ages, the common practice of hunting led people to coin
terms for groups of animals that were specific to each sort of animal (such as a
gaggle of geese or a pride of lions). These specialized collective nouns are
therefore called "terms of venery" (where "venery" is another word for hunting).
In the 14th and 15th centuries, this became a full-fledged fad, with silly terms
being coined just for fun and with the process being extended from animals to
groups of people.

These terms are still being concocted today. For those of us who like such
neologisms, there is now a site dedicated to them: All Sorts (subtitled "a
linguistic experiment").

A good place to start is the list of collective nouns sorted by popularity.

Some of my favorites are:

 * a seemingly empty room of ninjas
 * a brace of orthodontists
 * a hush of librarians
 * a _____ of mime artists
 * a heard of homonyms
 * a winter of discount tents
 * a clutch of handbags
 * a knot of string theorists
 * an array of programmers
 * a herd of eavesdroppers

The way the site works is that it catalogs whatever suggestions people make on
Twitter (when they use the hashtag "#collectivenouns").

Naturally, I couldn't help but suggest a few:

 * a closet of skeletons
 * a clattering of abacuses
 * an epiphany of light bulbs
 * an ink cloud of octopuses
 * a curiosity of question marks

The All Sorts project is a great concept because it clearly demonstrates the
frivolity and playfulness of minting new collective nouns. Try it. It's fun!

Posted by Surly Teabag Comments
Labels: neologisms, words

Older Posts Home

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


Buy Bananagrams Purchase Pairs in Pears Acquire Appletters(Yes, these are
affiliate links.)


Ba·nan·a·grams n. a word game like Scrabble without the board or the racks or
the big cardboard box or the scoring or the waiting




SELECTED POSTS

 * Tactics to help you win at Bananagrams
 * Q-without-U words
 * How else to play Bananagrams
 * Pangrams and what to do when you have too many consonants
 * What to do when you have too many vowels
 * Palindromes you are most likely to be able to make in Appletters
 * Letter distributions in Bananagrams and other games
 * Article about Bananagrams, Zip-It, and Oh-Spell
 * The game of Snatch (a.k.a., Anagrams)
 * Appletters & Pairs in Pears: New games from the makers of Bananagrams


SOME TOPICS

Bananagrams ~ Dictionaries ~ History ~ Online games ~ Other games ~ Reviews ~
Strategy ~ Wordplay

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


LINKS TO ELSEWHERE

 * Bananagrams.com - the official site of the makers of Bananagrams!
 * The Bananagrams Twitter feed
 * Wordnik - like Flickr for words

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Click here to contact me.



BLOG ARCHIVE

 * ▼  2015 (1)
   * ▼  February 2015 (1)
     * A. A. Milne on playing games

 * ►  2014 (1)
   * ►  June 2014 (1)

 * ►  2013 (4)
   * ►  December 2013 (1)
   * ►  November 2013 (1)
   * ►  October 2013 (1)
   * ►  September 2013 (1)

 * ►  2012 (12)
   * ►  December 2012 (1)
   * ►  November 2012 (2)
   * ►  August 2012 (1)
   * ►  May 2012 (2)
   * ►  April 2012 (1)
   * ►  March 2012 (2)
   * ►  February 2012 (1)
   * ►  January 2012 (2)

 * ►  2011 (24)
   * ►  December 2011 (2)
   * ►  November 2011 (1)
   * ►  October 2011 (2)
   * ►  September 2011 (1)
   * ►  August 2011 (1)
   * ►  July 2011 (3)
   * ►  June 2011 (3)
   * ►  May 2011 (1)
   * ►  April 2011 (2)
   * ►  March 2011 (4)
   * ►  February 2011 (2)
   * ►  January 2011 (2)

 * ►  2010 (39)
   * ►  December 2010 (2)
   * ►  November 2010 (4)
   * ►  October 2010 (3)
   * ►  September 2010 (2)
   * ►  August 2010 (2)
   * ►  July 2010 (2)
   * ►  June 2010 (4)
   * ►  May 2010 (4)
   * ►  April 2010 (3)
   * ►  March 2010 (4)
   * ►  February 2010 (4)
   * ►  January 2010 (5)

 * ►  2009 (42)
   * ►  December 2009 (4)
   * ►  November 2009 (3)
   * ►  October 2009 (5)
   * ►  September 2009 (6)
   * ►  August 2009 (6)
   * ►  July 2009 (6)
   * ►  June 2009 (6)
   * ►  May 2009 (2)
   * ►  April 2009 (4)




THE NEW JUMBO BANANAGRAMS IS NOW OUT!


BUY IT FROM AMAZON THROUGH THIS AFFILIATE LINK



 * The Boggle cube redesign and its effect on the difficulty of Boggle - Invalid
   Date
 * Tactics to help you win at Bananagrams - Invalid Date
 * Upgraded comment spam protection - Invalid Date
 * The Bananagrammer Equation - Invalid Date
 * The Deeper Meaning of Liff - Invalid Date




POLLY-VOUS BANANAGRAMS?


OUI! FRENCH BANANAGRAMS! (WHATEVER "AFFILIATE LINK" IS TRANSLATED INTO FRENCH)




TWITTER POSTS





BANANA GRAPH





SEARCH THIS BLOG (AND PAGES I'VE LINKED TO). RESULTS APPEAR AT THE TOP OF THIS
PAGE.






ABOUT ME

Surly Teabag Efficiency freak: Refers to himself in the third person. Often
drops the subject of the sentence. Only reads the first half of palindromes.
View my complete profile

Shop at Amazon.com and support Bananagrammer (As an Amazon Associate, I earn a
bit of money from qualifying purchases.)

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies von Google, um Dienste anzubieten und Zugriffe
zu analysieren. Deine IP-Adresse und dein User-Agent werden zusammen mit
Messwerten zur Leistung und Sicherheit für Google freigegeben. So können
Nutzungsstatistiken generiert, Missbrauchsfälle erkannt und behoben und die
Qualität des Dienstes gewährleistet werden.Weitere InformationenOk