ieeexplore.ieee.org
Open in
urlscan Pro
2a02:26f0:11a:38d::603
Public Scan
URL:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9995356/references
Submission: On January 05 via manual from AT — Scanned from DE
Submission: On January 05 via manual from AT — Scanned from DE
Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM
<form _ngcontent-vjt-c464="" novalidate="" class="search-bar-wrapper ng-untouched ng-pristine ng-valid">
<div _ngcontent-vjt-c464="" class="drop-down"><label _ngcontent-vjt-c464=""><select _ngcontent-vjt-c464="" aria-label="content type dropdown">
<option _ngcontent-vjt-c464="">All</option>
<option _ngcontent-vjt-c464="">Books</option>
<option _ngcontent-vjt-c464="">Conferences</option>
<option _ngcontent-vjt-c464="">Courses</option>
<option _ngcontent-vjt-c464="">Journals & Magazines</option>
<option _ngcontent-vjt-c464="">Standards</option>
<option _ngcontent-vjt-c464="">Authors</option>
<option _ngcontent-vjt-c464="">Citations</option><!---->
</select></label></div>
<div _ngcontent-vjt-c464="" class="search-field all">
<div _ngcontent-vjt-c464="" class="search-field-icon-container">
<div _ngcontent-vjt-c464="" class="global-search-bar"><xpl-typeahead-migr _ngcontent-vjt-c464="" placeholder="" name="search-term" ulclass="search-within-results ui-autocomplete ui-front ui-menu ui-widget ui-widget-content ui-corner-all"
minchars="3" _nghost-vjt-c70="">
<div _ngcontent-vjt-c70="" class="Typeahead text-sm-md-lh"><input _ngcontent-vjt-c70="" type="text" autocomplete="off" aria-label="Enter search text" class="Typeahead-input ng-untouched ng-pristine ng-valid" placeholder=""><!----></div>
</xpl-typeahead-migr></div><!----><!---->
<div _ngcontent-vjt-c464="" class="search-icon"><button _ngcontent-vjt-c464="" type="submit" aria-label="Search" class="fa fa-search"></button></div><!---->
</div><!---->
</div>
</form>Text Content
IEEE websites place cookies on your device to give you the best user experience.
By using our websites, you agree to the placement of these cookies. To learn
more, read our Privacy Policy.
Accept & Close
Skip to Main Content
* IEEE.org
* IEEE Xplore
* IEEE SA
* IEEE Spectrum
* More Sites
SUBSCRIBE
*
SUBSCRIBE
* Cart
*
*
* Create Account
* Personal Sign In
* Browse
* My Settings
* Help
Institutional Sign In
Institutional Sign In
AllBooksConferencesCoursesJournals & MagazinesStandardsAuthorsCitations
ADVANCED SEARCH
Conferences >2022 IEEE International Confe...
EFFICIENT BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGY META-MATCHING BASED ON INTERPOLATION MODEL BASED
HYBRID EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM
Publisher: IEEE
Cite This
PDF
Xingsi Xue; Qi Wu; Miao Ye; Hai Zhu; Yikun Huang
All Authors
Sign In or Purchase
to View Full Text
*
*
*
*
* Alerts
ALERTS
Manage Content Alerts
Add to Citation Alerts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
Document Sections
* I.
Introduction
* II.
Preliminaries
* III.
Evolutionary Algorithm with Interpolation Model
* IV.
Experiment
* V.
Conclusion and Future Work
Authors
Figures
References
Keywords
More Like This
* Download PDF
* View References
*
* Request Permissions
* Save to
* Alerts
Abstract:As an advanced biomedical knowledge modeling technology, biomedical
ontology models the biomedical domain. However, since the lack of uniform
standards for constructing b...View more
Metadata
Abstract:
As an advanced biomedical knowledge modeling technology, biomedical ontology
models the biomedical domain. However, since the lack of uniform standards for
constructing biomedical ontologies, the biomedical ontologies obtained by
different construction methods for the same thing may be different, which is
known as the biomedical ontology heterogeneity problem. To solve this problem,
we need to execute the biomedical ontology matching process, where it is
important to integrate different similarity measures to improve the quality of
alignment. Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) is an effective algorithm to address the
biomedical ontology meta-matching problem. However, the classical EA-based
biomedical ontology meta-matching technique needs to traverse reference
alignment to evaluate the individuals, which makes the algorithm have high
running time. To overcome this drawback, we propose an Interpolation Model (IM)
based Hybrid EA (IM-HEA), which combines EA with a problem-specific IM to
evaluate the individual and execute the local search process. In particular, we
use lattice design to divide the feasible domain into several uniform
sub-regions, and on this basis, approximately evaluate the fitness of newly
generated individual. In addition, to avoid the algorithm falling into the local
optimum, we further introduce an IM-based local search process into EA’s
evolving process. In the experiment, we test IM-HEA on OAEI’s Benchmark and
Anatomy and compared them with classical EA in terms of alignment’s quality and
running time. The experimental results show that IM-HEA greatly enhances the
efficiency of EA with little sacrifice on the alignment’s quality.
Published in: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and
Biomedicine (BIBM)
Date of Conference: 06-08 December 2022
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 02 January 2023
ISBN Information:
DOI: 10.1109/BIBM55620.2022.9995356
Publisher: IEEE
Conference Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Funding Agency:
References is not available for this document.
Contents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. INTRODUCTION
Semantic Web (SW) is an intelligent network capable of understanding words and
concepts and the logical relationships between them, which is proposed to define
and relate data in a computer-understood way [1], so it is particularly
important how to define the data, and ontologies meet this need. As a normative
modeling tool, an ontology is defined as a formal, explicit specification of a
shared conceptualization [2]. With the continuous advancement of ontology
technology, it has been widely used in various fields, including the biomedical
field. In the development of the biomedical field, researchers have constructed
various biomedical ontologies to facilitate their work [3]. Fig. 1 shows a
biomedical ontology. However, since different researchers have different
understandings of biomedical ontologies, this makes even the biomedical
ontologies created for the same thing different, which is called the biomedical
ontology heterogeneity problem [4]. The biomedical ontology heterogeneity
problem is a serious obstacle to the purpose of knowledge sharing. Biomedical
ontology matching is an effective way to address the biomedical ontology
heterogeneity problem through finding the connections between entities of
different biomedical ontologies [5], i.e., the mapping between biomedical
ontologies to bridge their semantic gaps.
Sign in to Continue Reading
Authors
Figures
References
Export References & Cited By
Select All
1.
T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler and O. Lassila, "The semantic web", Scientific
american, vol. 284, no. 5, pp. 34-43, 2001.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
2.
N. Guarino, D. Oberle and S. Staab, "What is an ontology?", Handbook on
ontologies, pp. 1-17, 2009.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
3.
D. L. Rubin, N. H. Shah and N. F. Noy, "Biomedical ontologies: a functional
perspective", Briefings in bioinformatics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 75-90, 2008.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
4.
X. Xue and J. Zhang, "Matching large-scale biomedical ontologies with central
concept based partitioning algorithm and adaptive compact evolutionary
algorithm", Applied Soft Computing, vol. 106, pp. 107343, 2021.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
5.
M. Ba and G. Diallo, "Large-scale biomedical ontology matching with servomap",
IRBM, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 56-59, 2013.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
6.
X. Xue, Y. Wang and W. Hao, "Using moea/d for optimizing ontology alignments",
Soft Computing, vol. 18, pp. 1589-1601, 2014.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
7.
J. Martinez-Gil and J. F. Aldana-Montes, "An overview of current ontology
meta-matching solutions", The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 27, no. 4, pp.
393-412, 2012.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
8.
K. Arulkumaran, A. Cully and J. Togelius, "Alphastar: An evolutionary
computation perspective", Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary
Computation Conference Companion ser, pp. 314-315, 2019, [online] Available:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3319619.3321894.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
9.
P. A. Vikhar, "Evolutionary algorithms: A critical review and its future
prospects", 2016 International Conference on Global Trends in Signal Processing
Information Computing and Communication (ICGTSPICC), pp. 261-265, 2016.
Show in Context View Article
Google Scholar
10.
A. E. Eiben and J. E. Smith, "What is an evolutionary algorithm?", Introduction
to evolutionary computing, pp. 25-48, 2015.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
11.
J. M. V. Naya, M. M. Romero, J. P. Loureiro, C. R. Munteanu and A. P. Sierra,
"Improving ontology alignment through genetic algorithms", Soft computing
methods for practical environment solutions: Techniques and studies. IGI Global,
pp. 240-259, 2010.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
12.
J. Martinez-Gil and J. F. Aldana-Montes, "Evaluation of two heuristic approaches
to solve the ontology meta-matching problem", Knowledge and Information Systems,
vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 225-247, 2011.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
13.
X. Xue, J. Liu, P.-W. Tsai, X. Zhan and A. Ren, "Optimizing ontology alignment
by using compact genetic algorithm", 2015 11th International Conference on
Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), pp. 231-234, 2015.
Show in Context View Article
Google Scholar
14.
X. Xue, P.-W. Tsai and L.-L. Zhang, "Using parallel compact evolutionary
algorithm for optimizing ontology alignment", International Conference on
Genetic and Evolutionary Computing, pp. 157-165, 2016.
Show in Context Google Scholar
15.
X. Xue and X. Yao, "Interactive ontology matching based on partial reference
alignment", Applied Soft Computing, vol. 72, pp. 355-370, 2018.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
16.
X. Xue and J. Lu, "A compact brain storm algorithm for matching ontologies",
IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 43898-43907, 2020.
Show in Context View Article
Google Scholar
17.
X. Xue and Y. Wang, "Ontology alignment based on instance using nsga-ii",
Journal of Information Science, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 58-70, 2015.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
18.
X. Xue and J.-S. Pan, "A segment-based approach for large-scale ontology
matching", Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 467-484, 2017.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
19.
V. Mascardi, A. Locoro and P. Rosso, "Automatic ontology matching via upper
ontologies: A systematic evaluation", IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data
engineering, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 609-623, 2009.
Show in Context View Article
Google Scholar
20.
G. Stoilos, G. Stamou and S. Kollias, "A string metric for ontology alignment",
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2005, pp. 624-637, 2005.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
21.
Z. Wu and M. Palmer, "Verbs semantics and lexical selection", Proceedings of the
32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-94),
1994.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
22.
N. Ferranti, S. S. R. F. Soares and J. F. de Souza, "Metaheuristics-based
ontology meta-matching approaches", Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 173,
pp. 114578, 2021.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
23.
Y. Bassil and P. Semaan, "ASR context-sensitive error correction based on
microsoft n-gram dataset", CoRR, vol. abs/1203.5262, 2012, [online] Available:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.5262.
Show in Context Google Scholar
24.
W. E. Winkler, "The state of record linkage and current research problems",
Statistical Research Division US Census Bureau, 1999.
Show in Context Google Scholar
25.
C. Fellbaum, "Wordnet", Theory and applications of ontology: computer
applications, pp. 231-243, 2010.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
26.
D. E. Golberg, "Genetic algorithms in search optimization and machine learning",
Addion wesley, vol. 1989, no. 102, pp. 36, 1989.
Show in Context Google Scholar
27.
G. Acampora, V. Loia and A. Vitiello, "Enhancing ontology alignment through a
memetic aggregation of similarity measures", Information Sciences, vol. 250, pp.
1-20, 2013, [online] Available:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025513004908.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
28.
F. Yates, "A new method of arranging variety trials involving a large number of
varieties", The Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 424-455,
1936.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
29.
J. M. Reddy, "Local optimal control of irrigation canals", Journal of Irrigation
and Drainage Engineering, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 616-631, 1990.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
30.
S. G. Milan, A. Roozbahani, N. A. Azar and S. Javadi, "Development of adaptive
neuro fuzzy inference system–evolutionary algorithms hybrid models (anfis-ea)
for prediction of optimal groundwater exploitation", Journal of Hydrology, vol.
598, pp. 126258, 2021.
Show in Context CrossRef Google Scholar
31.
M. Achichi, M. Cheatham, Z. Dragisic, J. Euzenat, D. Faria, A. Ferrara, G.
Flouris, I. Fundulaki, I. Harrow, V. Ivanova et al., "Results of the ontology
alignment evaluation initiative 2016", OM: Ontology matching, no. 1766, pp.
73-129, 2016.
Show in Context Google Scholar
Keywords
More Like This
Fuzzy concept lattice construction: A basis for building fuzzy ontologies
2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011)
Published: 2011
Asymmetric interpolation lattice
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published: 1996
Show More
REFERENCES
References is not available for this document.
IEEE PERSONAL ACCOUNT
* Change username/password
PURCHASE DETAILS
* Payment Options
* View Purchased Documents
PROFILE INFORMATION
* Communications Preferences
* Profession and Education
* Technical interests
NEED HELP?
* US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
* Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
* Contact & Support
FOLLOW
*
*
*
About IEEE Xplore | Contact Us | Help | Accessibility | Terms of Use |
Nondiscrimination Policy | IEEE Ethics Reporting | Sitemap | IEEE Privacy Policy
A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical
professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of
humanity.
© Copyright 2023 IEEE - All rights reserved.
IEEE ACCOUNT
* Change Username/Password
* Update Address
PURCHASE DETAILS
* Payment Options
* Order History
* View Purchased Documents
PROFILE INFORMATION
* Communications Preferences
* Profession and Education
* Technical Interests
NEED HELP?
* US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
* Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
* Contact & Support
* About IEEE Xplore
* Contact Us
* Help
* Accessibility
* Terms of Use
* Nondiscrimination Policy
* Sitemap
* Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies
A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical
professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of
humanity.
© Copyright 2023 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your
agreement to the terms and conditions.