www.nature.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.192.95 Public Scan

Back to summary

URL:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01483-8
Submission: On December 22 via api (December 22nd 2024, 6:12:00 am UTC) from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

GET /search

<form class="c-header__search-form" action="/search" method="get" role="search" autocomplete="off" data-test="inline-search">
  <label class="c-header__heading" for="keywords">Search articles by subject, keyword or author</label>
  <div class="c-header__search-layout c-header__search-layout--max-width">
    <div>
      <input type="text" required="" class="c-header__input" id="keywords" name="q" value="">
    </div>
    <div class="c-header__search-layout">
      <div>
        <label for="results-from" class="c-header__visually-hidden">Show results from</label>
        <select id="results-from" name="journal" class="c-header__select">
          <option value="" selected="">All journals</option>
          <option value="natsustain">This journal</option>
        </select>
      </div>
      <div>
        <button type="submit" class="c-header__search-button">Search</button>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</form>

POST https://www.nature.com/briefing/anthropocene

<form action="https://www.nature.com/briefing/anthropocene" method="post" data-location="banner" data-track="signup_nature_briefing_banner" data-track-action="transmit-form" data-track-category="nature briefing"
  data-track-label="Briefing banner submit: Flagship">
  <input id="briefing-banner-signup-form-input-track-originReferralPoint" type="hidden" name="track_originReferralPoint" value="AnthropoceneBriefingBanner">
  <input id="briefing-banner-signup-form-input-track-formType" type="hidden" name="track_formType" value="DirectEmailBanner">
  <input type="hidden" value="false" name="gdpr_tick" id="gdpr_tick_banner">
  <input type="hidden" value="false" name="marketing" id="marketing_input_banner">
  <input type="hidden" value="false" name="marketing_tick" id="marketing_tick_banner">
  <input type="hidden" value="AnthropoceneBriefingBanner" name="brieferEntryPoint" id="brieferEntryPoint_banner">
  <label class="nature-briefing-banner__email-label" for="emailAddress">Email address</label>
  <div class="nature-briefing-banner__email-wrapper">
    <input class="nature-briefing-banner__email-input box-sizing text14" type="email" id="emailAddress" name="emailAddress" value="" placeholder="e.g. jo.smith@university.ac.uk" required="" data-test-element="briefing-emailbanner-email-input">
    <input type="hidden" value="true" name="N:anthropocene" id="defaultNewsletter_banner">
    <button type="submit" class="nature-briefing-banner__submit-button box-sizing text14" data-test-element="briefing-emailbanner-signup-button">Sign up</button>
  </div>
  <div class="nature-briefing-banner__checkbox-wrapper grid grid-12 last">
    <input class="nature-briefing-banner__checkbox-checkbox" id="gdpr-briefing-banner-checkbox" type="checkbox" name="gdpr" value="true" data-test-element="briefing-emailbanner-gdpr-checkbox" required="">
    <label class="nature-briefing-banner__checkbox-label box-sizing text13 sans-serif block tighten-line-height" for="gdpr-briefing-banner-checkbox">I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the <em>Nature</em> and Springer Nature
      Limited <a href="https://www.nature.com/info/privacy">Privacy Policy</a>.</label>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

YOUR PRIVACY, YOUR CHOICE

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use
optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis,
and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal
data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of
the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

Manage preferences for further information and to change your choices.

Accept all cookies
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited
support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up
to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the
meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.

* View all journals
* Search

Search articles by subject, keyword or author
Show results from All journals This journal
Search
Advanced search

QUICK LINKS

* Explore articles by subject
* Find a job
* Guide to authors
* Editorial policies

* Log in

* Explore content

EXPLORE CONTENT

* Research articles
* Reviews & Analysis
* News & Comment
* Current issue
* Collections

* Follow us on Facebook
* Follow us on Twitter
* Subscribe
* Sign up for alerts
* RSS feed

* About the journal

ABOUT THE JOURNAL

* Aims & Scope
* Journal Information
* Journal Metrics
* About the Editors
* Research Cross-Journal Editorial Team
* Reviews Cross-Journal Editorial Team
* Our publishing models
* Editorial Values Statement
* Editorial Policies
* Content Types
* Community
* Expert panels
* Advisory Panel
* Contact

* Publish with us

PUBLISH WITH US

* Submission Guidelines
* For Reviewers
* Language editing services
* Submit manuscript

* Subscribe

* Sign up for alerts
* RSS feed

1. nature
2. nature sustainability
3. perspectives
4. article

* Perspective
* Published: 19 December 2024

TAILORED POLICIES FOR PERENNIAL WOODY CROPS ARE CRUCIAL TO ADVANCE SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT

* Carlos Martinez-Nuñez ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7814-49851,
* Elena Velado-Alonso ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-29291,2,
* Jacques Avelino ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1983-94313,4,
* Pedro J. Rey ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-03935,
* G. Martijn ten Hoopen ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2133-31303,
* Guy Pe’er6,7,
* Yi Zou ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7082-92588,
* Yunhui Liu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7282-834X9,
* Philip Antwi-Agyei10,
* Adrien Rusch ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3921-975011,
* Charles Staver ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4532-607712,
* Tharaka S. Priyadarshana ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3962-546513,
* Denis J. Sonwa14,15,
* Damayanti Buchori16,
* Lucas A. Garibaldi ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0725-404917,18,
* Elena D. Concepción ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6715-690219,
* Owen T. Lewis ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-611120,
* Ivette Perfecto ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1749-719121 &
* …
* Ignasi Bartomeus ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7893-43891

Show authors

Nature Sustainability (2024)Cite this article

* 62 Accesses

* 3 Altmetric

* Metrics details

ABSTRACT

Perennial woody crops, which are crucial to our diets and global economies, have
the potential to play a major role in achieving multiple UN Sustainable
Development Goals pertaining to biodiversity conservation, socio-economic
development and climate change mitigation. However, this potential is hindered
by insufficient scientific and policy attention on perennial woody crops, and by
the intensification of perennial crop cultivation in the form of monocropping
with high external inputs. In this Perspective, we highlight the potential of
properly managed and incentivized perennial woody crops to support holistic
sustainable development and urge scientists and policymakers to develop an
effective agenda to better harness their benefits.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

ACCESS OPTIONS

Access through your institution

Access through your institution
Change institution
Buy or subscribe

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$29.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Learn more

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

$119.00 per year

only $9.92 per issue

Learn more

Buy this article

* Purchase on SpringerLink
* Instant access to full article PDF

Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS:

* Log in
* Learn about institutional subscriptions
* Read our FAQs
* Contact customer support

Fig. 1: Overlap between the main perennial crops and hotspots of biodiversity.

Fig. 2: The importance of perennial crops worldwide.

Fig. 3: Scientific attention received by perennial crops and annual crops.

Fig. 4: Effects of agricultural practices in perennial crops along the
sustainability gradient.

Fig. 5: Main threats to the sustainability of key perennial crops worldwide.

Fig. 6: Agricultural practices and farming models that could be incentivized by
new agricultural policies.

SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS

FOSTERING A CLIMATE-SMART INTENSIFICATION FOR OIL PALM

Article 25 March 2021

SEVERE DECLINE IN LARGE FARMLAND TREES IN INDIA OVER THE PAST DECADE

Article Open access 15 May 2024

THE GLOBAL CROPLAND-SPARING POTENTIAL OF HIGH-YIELD FARMING

Article 16 April 2020

REFERENCES

1. Clough, Y. et al. Land-use choices follow profitability at the expense of
ecological functions in Indonesian smallholder landscapes. Nat. Commun. 7,
13137 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

2. Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial
biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

3. Rohr, J. R. et al. Emerging human infectious diseases and the links to
global food production. Nat. Sustain. 2, 445–456 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

4. Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359,
270–272 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

5. Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE)—Test Version: Process of
Development and Guidelines for Application (FAO, 2019);
https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca7407en/

6. Tscharntke, T., Grass, I., Wanger, T. C., Westphal, C. & Batáry, P. Beyond
organic farming—harnessing biodiversity-friendly landscapes. Trends Ecol.
Evol. 36, 919–930 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

7. Garibaldi, L. A. et al. Policies for ecological intensification of crop
production. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 282–286 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

8. Lal, R. et al. Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change. J. Soil
Water Conserv. 66, 276–285 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

9. Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J. & Wright, A. Nature’s Matrix Linking
Agriculture, Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty (Taylor and
Francis, 2019).

10. Bhagwat, S. A., Willis, K. J., Birks, H. J. B. & Whittaker, R. J.
Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23,
261–267 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

11. Wanger, T. C. et al. Integrating agroecological production in a robust
post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1150–1152
(2020).

12. Fitzherbert, E. B. et al. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity?
Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 538–545 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

13. Li, T. M. Securing oil palm smallholder livelihoods without more
deforestation in Indonesia. Nat. Sustain. 2024 74 7, 387–393 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

14. Kalischek, N. et al. Cocoa plantations are associated with deforestation in
Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana. Nat. Food 2023 45 4, 384–393 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

15. Garibaldi, L. A. & Pérez-Méndez, N. Positive outcomes between crop
diversity and agricultural employment worldwide. Ecol. Econ. 164, 106358
(2019).

Article Google Scholar

16. Seneduangdeth, D., Ounmany, K., Phommavong, S., Phouxay, K. & Hathalong, K.
Labor employment opportunities in coffee production in southern Lao
People’s Democratic Republic. J. Asian Rural Stud. 2, 16–36 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

17. Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2022: Reforming Agricultural
Policies for Climate Change Mitigation (OECD, 2022);
https://doi.org/10.1787/7f4542bf-en

18. Batáry, P., Dicks, L. V., Kleijn, D. & Sutherland, W. J. The role of
agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management.
Conserv. Biol. 29, 1006–1016 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

19. Boetzl, F. A. et al. A multitaxa assessment of the effectiveness of
agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity management. Proc. Natl Acad.
Sci. USA 118, e2016038118 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

20. Candel, J. J. L., Lakner, S. & Pe’er, G. Europe’s reformed agricultural
policy disappoints. Nature 595, 650 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

21. Pe’er, G. et al. Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to
address sustainability challenges. People Nat. 2, 305–316 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

22. Nicholson, E. et al. Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal,
milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.
Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1338–1349 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

23. Pimentel, D. et al. Annual vs. perennial grain production. Agric. Ecosyst.
Environ. 161, 1–9 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

24. Batello, C. et al. Perennial Crops for Food Security: Proceedings of the
FAO Expert Workshop (FAO, 2014).

25. Crews, T. E., Carton, W. & Olsson, L. Is the future of agriculture
perennial? Imperatives and opportunities to reinvent agriculture by
shifting from annual monocultures to perennial polycultures. Glob. Sustain.
1, e11 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

26. Kleijn, D. et al. Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between
science and practice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 154–166 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

27. Myers, N., Mittermeler, R. A., Mittermeler, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B. &
Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403,
853–858 (2000).

Article CAS Google Scholar

28. Sonwa, D. J., Weise, S. F., Schroth, G., Janssens, M. J. J. & Shapiro, H.
Y. Structure of cocoa farming systems in West and Central Africa: a review.
Agrofor. Syst. 93, 2009–2025 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

29. Tarifa, R. et al. Agricultural intensification erodes taxonomic and
functional diversity in Mediterranean olive groves by filtering out rare
species. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 2266–2276 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

30. Winter, S. et al. Effects of vegetation management intensity on
biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: a meta-analysis. J. Appl.
Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13124 (2018).

31. Valencia, V., García-Barrios, L., West, P., Sterling, E. J. & Naeem, S. The
role of coffee agroforestry in the conservation of tree diversity and
community composition of native forests in a Biosphere Reserve. Agric.
Ecosyst. Environ. 189, 154–163 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

32. Schroth, G. & Harvey, C. A. Biodiversity conservation in cocoa production
landscapes: an overview. Biodivers. Conserv. 16, 2237–2244 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

33. Rey, P. J. et al. Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of ground herb
cover in olive groves: implications for regional biodiversity conservation.
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 277, 61–73 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

34. Sonwa, D. J. et al. Diversity of plants in cocoa agroforests in the humid
forest zone of Southern Cameroon. Biodivers. Conserv. 16, 2385–2400 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

35. Bruggisser, O. T., Schmidt-Entling, M. H. & Bacher, S. Effects of vineyard
management on biodiversity at three trophic levels. Biol. Conserv. 143,
1521–1528 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

36. Clough, Y. et al. Combining high biodiversity with high yields in tropical
agroforests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8311–8316 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

37. Kavvadias, V. & Koubouris, G. in Soil Fertility Management for Sustainable
Development (eds Panpatte, D. & Jhala, Y.) 167–188 (Springer, 2019).

38. Cerda, R. et al. Effects of shade, altitude and management on multiple
ecosystem services in coffee agroecosystems. Eur. J. Agron. 82, 308–319
(2017).

Article Google Scholar

39. FAOSTAT (FAO, 2021); https://www.fao.org/faostat

40. Ewing, P. M. et al. Smallholder farms have and can store more carbon than
previously estimated. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 1471–1483 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

41. Batsi, G., Sonwa, D. J., Mangaza, L., Ebuy, J. & Kahindo, J. M. Preliminary
estimation of above-ground carbon storage in cocoa agroforests of
Bengamisa-Yangambi forest landscape (Democratic Republic of Congo).
Agrofor. Syst. 95, 1505–1517 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

42. Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. The agroecological matrix as alternative to
the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.
USA 107, 5786–5791 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

43. Kremen, C. & Merenlender, A. M. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and
people. Science 362, eaau6020 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

44. González del Portillo, D., Arroyo, B. & Morales, M. B. The adequacy of
alfalfa crops as an agri-environmental scheme: a review of agronomic
benefits and effects on biodiversity. J. Nat. Conserv. 69, 126253 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

45. Glover, J. D. et al. Increased food and ecosystem security via perennial
grains. Science 328, 1638–1639 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

46. DeHaan, L. R. et al. Discussion: prioritize perennial grain development for
sustainable food production and environmental benefits. Sci. Total Environ.
895, 164975 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

47. Zhang, S. et al. Sustained productivity and agronomic potential of
perennial rice. Nat. Sustain. 6, 28–38 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

48. ASEAN Regional Guidelines for Sustainable Agriculture in ASEAN Jakarta
(ASEAN Secretariat, 2023).

49. The common agricultural policy at a glance. European Commission
https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-glance_en
(2021).

50. Forbidden Fruit (Pesticide Action Network Europe, 2022);
https://www.pan-europe.info/sites/pan-europe.info/files/public/resources/reports/ForbiddenFruit_01.pdf

51. Jha, S. et al. Shade coffee: update on a disappearing refuge for
biodiversity. BioScience 64, 416–428 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

52. Harvey, C. A. et al. Transformation of coffee-growing landscapes across
Latin America: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 41, 1–19 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

53. Guerrero-Casado, J., Carpio, A. J., Tortosa, F. S. & Villanueva, A. J.
Environmental challenges of intensive woody crops: the case of super
high-density olive groves. Sci. Total Environ. 798, 149212 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

54. Morgado, R. et al. Drivers of irrigated olive grove expansion in
Mediterranean landscapes and associated biodiversity impacts. Landsc. Urban
Plan. 225, 104429 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

55. Kopittke, P. M., Menzies, N. W., Wang, P., McKenna, B. A. & Lombi, E. Soil
and the intensification of agriculture for global food security. Environ.
Int. 132, 105078 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

56. Wolkovich, E. M., García De Cortázar-Atauri, I., Morales-Castilla, I.,
Nicholas, K. A. & Lacombe, T. From Pinot to Xinomavro in the world’s future
wine-growing regions. Nat. Clim. Change 2017 81 8, 29–37 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

57. Dempewolf, H., Krishnan, S. & Guarino, L. Our shared global responsibility:
safeguarding crop diversity for future generations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.
USA 120, e2205768119 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

58. Kühn, S. Global employment and social trends. World Employ. Soc. Outlook
2018, 5–10 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

59. Kleijn, D. et al. Bending the curve of biodiversity loss requires rewarding
farmers economically for conservation management. ARPHA Prepr. 4, e104881
(2023).

Google Scholar

60. Scheper, J. et al. Biodiversity and pollination benefits trade off against
profit in an intensive farming system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120,
e2212124120 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

61. Hayes, T., Murtinho, F., Wolff, H., López-Sandoval, M. F. & Salazar, J.
Effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services after loss and uncertainty
of compensation. Nat. Sustain. 5, 81–88 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

62. Malekpour, S. et al. What scientists need to do to accelerate progress on
the SDGs. Nature 621, 250–254 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

63. Zinngrebe, Y. et al. Prioritizing partners and products for the
sustainability of the EU’s agri-food trade. One Earth 7, 674–686 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

64. Waarts, Y. R. et al. Multiple pathways towards achieving a living income
for different types of smallholder tree-crop commodity farmers. Food Secur.
13, 1467–1496 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

65. Gaudaré, U. et al. Soil organic carbon stocks potentially at risk of
decline with organic farming expansion. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 719–725
(2023).

Article Google Scholar

66. Wijerathna-Yapa, A., Henry, R. J., Dunn, M. & Beveridge, C. A. Science and
opinion in decision making: a case study of the food security collapse in
Sri Lanka. Mod. Agric. 1, 142–151 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

67. Asitoakor, B. K. et al. Influences of climate variability on cocoa health
and productivity in agroforestry systems in Ghana. Agric. For. Meteorol.
327, 109199 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

68. Jamal, A. M. et al. Gendered perceptions and adaptation practices of
smallholder cocoa farmers to climate variability in the central region of
Ghana. Environ. Chall. 5, 100293 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

69. Afriyie-Kraft, L., Zabel, A. & Damnyag, L. Adaptation strategies of
Ghanaian cocoa farmers under a changing climate. For. Policy Econ. 113,
102115 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

70. Antwi-Agyei, P. et al. Perceived stressors of climate vulnerability across
scales in the Savannah zone of Ghana: a participatory approach. Reg.
Environ. Change 17, 213–227 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

71. Tang, F. H. M. et al. CROPGRIDS: a global geo-referenced dataset of 173
crops. Sci. Data 11, 1–14 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

72. Noss, R. F. et al. How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized:
lessons from the North American Coastal Plain. Divers. Distrib. 21, 236–244
(2015).

Article Google Scholar

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge funding from the project SHOWCASE (SHOWCASing synergies between
agriculture, biodiversity and Ecosystem services to help farmers capitalizing on
native biodiversity) within the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation
programme (grant agreement number 862480). C.M.-N. was supported by the ‘Juan de
la Cierva’ programme (reference number FJC2021-046829-I). T.S.P. was supported
by a research scholarship awarded by the Nanyang Technological University,
Singapore (application number R2004096). P.J.R. acknowledges the projects
RECOVECOS (PID2019-108332GB-I00, funded by MICIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) and
OLIVARES VIVOS+ (LIFE20 AT/ES/001487, European Commission). The contribution of
D.J.S. was made possible by financial support from NORAD (grant number
QZA-21/0124) for the CIFOR GCS-REDD+ (Global Comparative Study on REDD+)
project. A.R. acknowledges support from the French National Research Agency
(ANR) under grant number 20-PCPA-0010 and from the National Program PEPR
‘Solutions fondées sur la Nature’ (SOLU-BIOD) through the Living Lab ‘Bacchus’.
G.P. acknowledges funding from the strategic project iCAP-BES through the German
Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (grant
number DFG FZT 118), as well as from the EU Horizon Europe project
Agroecology-TRANSECT (grant agreement number 101060816). This publication
reflects only the authors’ opinions.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS

1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, Estación Biológica de Doñana EBD
(CSIC), Seville, Spain

Carlos Martinez-Nuñez, Elena Velado-Alonso & Ignasi Bartomeus

2. Functional Agrobiodiversity, George August University of Göttingen,
Göttingen, Germany

Elena Velado-Alonso

3. French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD),
UMR PHIM, Montpellier, France

Jacques Avelino & G. Martijn ten Hoopen

4. PHIM (Plant Health Institute Montpellier), CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro,
Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France

Jacques Avelino

5. Departamento de Biología Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad
de Jaén & Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig (UFZ), Jaén,
Spain

Pedro J. Rey

6. Department of Biodiversity and People, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental
Research Leipzig (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany

Guy Pe’er

7. Department of Biodiversity and People, German Centre for integrative
Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Leipzig, Germany

Guy Pe’er

8. Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool
University, Suzhou, China

Yi Zou

9. College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University,
Beijing, China

Yunhui Liu

10. Department of Environmental Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science
and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

Philip Antwi-Agyei

11. INRAE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, ISVV, SAVE, Villenave d’Ornon, France

Adrien Rusch

12. Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico

Charles Staver

13. Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University,
Singapore City, Singapore

Tharaka S. Priyadarshana

14. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Yaoundé, Cameroon

Denis J. Sonwa

15. World Resources Institute (WRI), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Denis J. Sonwa

16. Center for Transdiciplinary and Sustainability Sciences (CCTS), IPB
University (Bogor Agricultural University), Bogor, Indonesia

Damayanti Buchori

17. Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos
Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Río Negro, Argentina

Lucas A. Garibaldi

18. Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos
Naturales, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
(CONICET), Río Negro, Argentina

Lucas A. Garibaldi

19. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, Spain

Elena D. Concepción

20. Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Owen T. Lewis

21. School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, MI, USA

Ivette Perfecto

Authors
1. Carlos Martinez-Nuñez
View author publications