www.washingtonpost.com Open in urlscan Pro
104.102.34.16  Public Scan

URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/20/trump-mass-deportations-immigration/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=em...
Submission: On February 21 via api from BE — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

<form class="w-100 left" id="registration-form" data-qa="regwall-registration-form-container">
  <div>
    <div class="wpds-c-QqrcX wpds-c-QqrcX-iPJLV-css">
      <div class="wpds-c-iQOSPq"><span role="label" id="radix-0" class="wpds-c-hdyOns wpds-c-iJWmNK">Enter email address</span><input id="registration-email-id" type="text" aria-invalid="false" name="registration-email"
          data-qa="regwall-registration-form-email-input" data-private="true" class="wpds-c-djFMBQ wpds-c-djFMBQ-iPJLV-css" value="" aria-labelledby="radix-0"></div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="dn">
    <div class="db mt-xs mb-xs "><span role="label" id="radix-1" class="wpds-c-hdyOns"><span class="db font-xxxs gray-darker pt-xxs pb-xxs gray-dark" style="padding-top: 1px;"><span>By selecting "Start reading," you agree to The Washington Post's
            <a target="_blank" style="color:inherit;" class="underline" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/information/2022/01/01/terms-of-service/">Terms of Service</a> and
            <a target="_blank" style="color:inherit;" class="underline" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/privacy-policy/">Privacy Policy</a>.</span></span></span>
      <div class="db gray-dark relative flex pt-xxs pb-xxs items-start gray-darker"><span role="label" id="radix-2" class="wpds-c-hdyOns wpds-c-jDXwHV"><button type="button" role="checkbox" aria-checked="false" data-state="unchecked" value="on"
            id="mcCheckbox" data-testid="mcCheckbox" class="wpds-c-cqTwYl wpds-c-cqTwYl-bnVAXI-size-125 wpds-c-cqTwYl-kFjMjo-cv wpds-c-cqTwYl-ikKWKCv-css" aria-labelledby="radix-2"></button><input type="checkbox" aria-hidden="true" tabindex="-1"
            value="on" style="transform: translateX(-100%); position: absolute; pointer-events: none; opacity: 0; margin: 0px; width: 0px; height: 0px;"><span class="wpds-c-bFeFXz"><span class="relative db gray-darker" style="padding-top: 2px;"><span
                class="relative db font-xxxs" style="padding-top: 1px;"><span>The Washington Post may use my email address to provide me occasional special offers via email and through other platforms. I can opt out at any
                  time.</span></span></span></span></span></div>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div id="subs-turnstile-hook" class="center dn"></div><button data-qa="regwall-registration-form-cta-button" type="submit"
    class="wpds-c-kSOqLF wpds-c-kSOqLF-hDKJFr-variant-cta wpds-c-kSOqLF-eHdizY-density-default wpds-c-kSOqLF-ejCoEP-icon-left wpds-c-kSOqLF-ikFyhzm-css w-100 mt-sm"><span>Start reading</span></button>
</form>

Text Content

Accessibility statementSkip to main content

Democracy Dies in Darkness
SubscribeSign in



Advertisement


Close
The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness
ElectionsWho is running Live updates Election 2024 N.Y. special election results
Key issues Republican delegate tracker 2024 calendar
ElectionsWho is running Live updates Election 2024 N.Y. special election results
Key issues Republican delegate tracker 2024 calendar



TRUMP AND ALLIES PLANNING MILITARIZED MASS DEPORTATIONS, DETENTION CAMPS


AS PRESIDENT, TRUMP SOUGHT TO USE MILITARY PLANES AND BASES FOR DEPORTATION.
NOW, HE AND HIS ALLIES ARE TALKING ABOUT A NEW EFFORT THAT CURRENT AND FORMER
OFFICIALS WARN COULD BE IMPRACTICAL AND DANGEROUS.

By Isaac Arnsdorf
, 
Nick Miroff
and 
Josh Dawsey
Updated February 21, 2024 at 12:37 p.m. EST|Published February 21, 2024 at 5:00
a.m. EST

Migrants are gathered inside the fence of a makeshift detention center in El
Paso on March 27, 2019. (Sergio Flores for The Washington Post)

Listen
16 min

Share
Comment on this storyComment
Add to your saved stories
Save

Faced with a surge of migrant families at the U.S.-Mexico border in 2018 and
2019, Donald Trump’s White House discussed ways to more aggressively deploy the
resources and the might of the U.S. military.


Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment
newsletter.ArrowRight


Aides and officials spoke privately about detaining migrants on military bases
and flying them out of the country on military planes — ideas that the Pentagon
headed off. Throughout his presidency, Trump himself would frequently demand to
send troops to the border and catch people crossing.



“He was obsessed with having the military involved,” said a former senior
administration official, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity
to describe private discussions.

Story continues below advertisement



That approach and unfinished business have taken on renewed significance and
urgency as the country confronts another migrant crisis on the U.S.-Mexico
border, and as Trump closes in on the Republican presidential nomination. The
former president is making immigration a core campaign theme, promoting a
proposal for an unprecedented deportation effort if he is returned to power.

Advertisement


Trump pledges that as president he would immediately launch “the largest
domestic deportation operation in American history.” As a model, he points to an
Eisenhower-era program known as “Operation Wetback,” using a derogatory slur for
Mexican migrants. The operation used military tactics to round up and remove
migrant workers, sometimes transporting them in dangerous conditions that led to
some deaths. Former administration officials and policy experts said staging an
even larger operation today would face a bottleneck in detention space — a
problem that Trump adviser Stephen Miller and other allies have proposed
addressing by building mass deportation camps.

“Americans can expect that immediately upon President Trump’s return to the Oval
Office, he will restore all of his prior policies, implement brand new
crackdowns that will send shock waves to all the world’s criminal smugglers, and
marshal every federal and state power necessary to institute the largest
deportation operation in American history,” said Trump campaign spokeswoman
Karoline Leavitt in a statement. She added that undocumented immigrants “should
not get comfortable because very soon they will be going home.”



Trump has made similar promises and has used inflammatory smears since his 2016
campaign. But he, his aides and allies say a second turn in office would be more
effective in operating the levers of the federal bureaucracy and less vulnerable
to internal resistance. During his term, former officials said, Trump learned to
install more officials at the Department of Homeland Security who would carry
out his orders instead of trying to curb his impulses.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Throughout his current campaign, the former president has exerted his influence
on the immigration policy debate on several fronts. He pressured congressional
Republicans to reject a bipartisan compromise to expand enforcement funding and
powers, arguing that it would give the Democrats a political victory and that it
was not restrictive enough. He has also escalated his use of dehumanizing
language to describe migrants, accusing them of “poisoning the blood of our
country” and calling the record unauthorized border crossings an “invasion,” an
“open wound” and a source of imminent terrorist attacks.

But his deportation proposal is one part of his emerging platform that experts,
current and former government officials and others described as especially
alarming, impractical and prone to significant legal and logistical hurdles.

“You’re talking about officers in tactical gear going into communities, being
videotaped in the streets, putting kids in car seats, carrying baby formula.
Then what do you do with those families?” said Jason Houser, U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement’s chief of staff from January 2022 until March 2023.
“Are you going to go into neighborhoods in Philly, New York, Baltimore and start
tugging people out of communities? That’s what they want. It puts law
enforcement and the communities at risk.”

Reflecting on the ideas Trump and his team discussed during his presidency,
Houser said, “Their ideas were psychotic.”


‘THE MILITARY WILL BE DEPLOYED’

Trump’s aides are encouraged by polls showing voters prioritizing immigration
and trusting him more than President Biden on the issue. But there is some
disagreement in his circles on the specifics.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



While advisers agree on border security, building a wall on the southern border
and deporting migrants who have committed crimes after entering the country as
winning political issues, one adviser expressed concern that promising to deport
massive numbers of people who haven’t been convicted of a crime could hurt Trump
in a general election campaign. Trump’s language and proposals are already under
heavy criticism from the Biden campaign, as well as pro-immigration and civil
liberties groups.

“Trump is following the 20th century dictator’s playbook of dehumanizing
vulnerable groups in order to isolate them and justify cruelty by the state,”
Genevieve Nadeau, a former DHS lawyer, said in a report by the nonpartisan
organization Protect Democracy. “He’s backing up his rhetoric by threatening to
invoke extreme and novel legal tools to effectuate an agenda of inhumanity on a
scale we haven’t seen for generations. We should expect him to follow through on
his pledges.”

The Trump campaign has also said he would sign an executive order on his first
day in office to withhold passports, Social Security numbers and other
government benefits from children of undocumented immigrants born in the United
States. The idea of challenging the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of birthright
citizenship would be sure to draw a court challenge. The proposal has been
raised by Trump and Miller before, but the specific promise of an executive
order indicated the campaign has put further effort into fleshing it out.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Some in the Trump campaign have tried to tamp down talk of mass deportations and
have become frustrated with some outside allies, the Trump adviser said. But
another person close to the campaign said Trump and his team remain in touch
with Miller, who has described “large-scale raids” and “throughput facilities.”
Trump advisers view Miller as the leading authority on “America First”
immigration policy, and he is widely expected to reenter the West Wing if Trump
wins in November.

“I don’t care what the hell happens in this world,” Miller said on a Feb. 5
podcast interview with right-wing activist Charlie Kirk. “If President Trump
gets reelected, the border’s going to be sealed, the military will be deployed,
the National Guard will be activated, and the illegals are going home.”

Republicans frustrated with Biden have increasingly promoted the idea of
militarized immigration enforcement. In Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has deployed
thousands of National Guard soldiers to stop crossings along the Rio Grande,
where he announced plans Friday to build a military base to house the troops.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Trump and his campaign have offered few details about how he would implement his
deportation operation, other than to “use all necessary federal, state, local
and military resources.”

The pool of potential deportees is large. There are about 11 million immigrants
in the United States without legal status, according to the most recent
estimates. Nearly 7 million of those are known to ICE, which maintains a vast
database of people eligible for deportation whose asylum claims and immigration
cases are still pending.

A smaller subset of that caseload — about 1.3 million people — remain in the
United States despite having received a deportation order from an immigration
judge. These potential deportees, if taken into custody, are the easiest for the
government to send home, because they have already received due process. But the
government often doesn’t know where they are.

Beyond those challenges, there are other major logistical and operational
obstacles to the kind of mass deportations Trump has promised. The first is
available personnel: ICE only has about 6,000 deportation officers nationwide.
The amount of time it takes to recruit, hire, screen and train a new deportation
officer is about two years, according to current and former ICE officials.



Detention space is also squeezed. The Biden administration is using about 38,000
beds at immigration jails and other facilities that hold migrants awaiting
deportation. During the Trump years, the number exceeded 50,000, but never
reached the kinds of capacity levels necessary for the kind of mega-deportation
system Trump envisions.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Some ICE officials said the agency could find more available beds in county
jails. But Trump surrogates have gone further, suggesting they would put
migrants in “camps” or “tents.”

Share this articleShare

“So you go around the country arresting illegal immigrants in large-scale raids,
you have to have somewhere to put them,” Miller said in a November podcast
interview with Kirk. “So you create this efficiency by having these standing
facilities where planes are moving off the runway constantly — probably military
aircraft, some existing DHS assets — and that’s how you’re able to scale.”

Miller also suggested using National Guard troops, state police and other
federal law enforcement agencies as force multipliers, even sending National
Guard troops from Republican-led states into neighboring states governed by
Democrats. “If you’re going to go into an unfriendly state like Maryland, well,
they would just be Virginia doing the arrest in Maryland,” he said in the
November podcast interview.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Such street-level roundups are so resource-intensive that many ICE officials
view them as impractical. The operations require officers to locate migrants and
surveil them to determine a safe opportunity to make an arrest. Such arrests
often depend on the cooperation of local police.

“The most crucial part of any law enforcement effort is not to undermine popular
support for that effort, and that means doing it legally, doing it respectfully
and doing it properly,” said Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge who is
now at the Center for Immigration Studies, which seeks tighter restrictions.

To arrest and deport families with children, the preparations are even more
time-consuming. An operation targeting 20 to 30 families for arrest takes two to
three weeks of planning, said Houser, the former ICE chief of staff. For ICE to
reach a target of 300,000 to 500,000 deportations per year — a far more modest
goal than Trump’s — Houser said the agency would need two to three times as many
deportation officers as ICE has.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



“You’re talking about building a major logistics apparatus that would still have
to meet court and legal requirements for health care and child care,” he said.

ICE officers and staff are burned out by the pace and intensity of their work
over the past several years, according to a veteran DHS official who was not
authorized to speak to reporters. For other law enforcement agencies, the drain
on their resources would come at the expense of other legitimate priorities, the
former DHS official said, and the operation would have to be continuous to deter
new arrivals.

“It feels shortsighted, stupid and an enormous waste of money,” the official
said.

Another problem is so-called “recalcitrant countries” that limit or refuse to
take back deportees. Nations such as Venezuela and Cuba are already under U.S.
economic sanctions, leaving Washington with reduced leverage to compel them to
take more deportation flights.

Even other nations that remain U.S. allies in Latin America set conditions on
the number of flights and deportees they’re willing to accept. Passenger
manifests have to be sent several days in advance. It’s not as simple as loading
hundreds of people into a military transport plane and dropping them off
wherever the president wants.

A former senior administration official said Trump would be emboldened in a
second term and insist on moving faster than his first administration did. The
former president has repeatedly suggested he would act as a “dictator” on “day
one” to close the border — sometimes adding that he made this comment in jest.

“We will do that immediately,” Trump said in a campaign video last year. “This
invasion will not stand.”


‘I KNOW IT SOUNDS HARSH’

Trump’s and Miller’s determination to carry out mass deportations in a second
term grew out of frustration with setbacks to their plans while Trump was in
power.

In Trump’s first month as president, in 2017, a draft memo obtained by the
Associated Press proposed deploying as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to
arrest undocumented immigrants throughout the interior of the country. The memo
was never implemented, but Trump did sign an executive order directing ICE to
detain more unauthorized immigrants, including pregnant women and people without
criminal records.

Trump pledged to immediately deport 2 million to 3 million people after his 2016
win but never came close to hitting those targets. At his administration’s
high-water mark in 2019, ICE carried out 267,258 deportations and returns,
Department of Homeland Security data show.

Trump officials likened the approach to “taking the shackles off,” but it
generated a backlash that drove more cities and jurisdictions to adopt sanctuary
policies limiting their cooperation with ICE. ICE officials have long preferred
to take people into custody from a secure setting such as a jail to avoid the
complex planning and adverse publicity of arrests in homes, workplaces or
streets.

As the number of people in ICE custody jumped 22 percent in Trump’s first two
years, the DHS inspector general uncovered “egregious violations of detention
standards,” including inadequate medical care, expired food, lack of recreation,
moldy bathrooms and inadequate clothing and hygiene supplies. A separate
inspector general’s investigation found “dangerous overcrowding” in an El Paso
facility, where a cell built for 25 people held 155.

In June 2018, reporters and human rights activists toured a facility in McAllen,
Tex., where children slept under foil sheets surrounded by chain-link fencing,
after DHS acknowledged separating children from their parents at the border.
Public outrage over an audio clip of a sobbing child forced Trump to halt the
practice. DHS later identified 4,227 separated children, 3,147 of whom were
reunited with their parent as of November 2023.

Asked in 2023 whether he might reimpose family separation as president, Trump
declined to rule it out and defended the policy. “I know it sounds harsh,” he
said in a CNN town hall. “When you say to a family that if you come we’re going
to break you up, they don’t come. And we can’t afford to have any more.”



In 2019, Trump ordered pre-dawn raids targeting 2,000 families in 10 cities who
had received deportation orders, over concerns from top DHS officials about lack
of preparation and the effect on children. The administration also changed
immigration enforcement rules to expedite deportations of people who had been in
the country for less than two years, making it possible to remove them without a
hearing in front of an immigration judge.

“You think other countries have judges that give them trials?” Trump said in
public remarks in 2018.

As the president’s top adviser on immigration matters, Miller advocated for
invoking the Insurrection Act to mobilize the Department of Defense, according
to the former officials. Pentagon officials balked at the idea of using military
bases and planes, current and former officials recalled, citing concerns of
getting mired in an open-ended commitment or compromising troop readiness.

The president himself would often demand to send troops to block the border,
according to the former officials. Aides would explain to Trump the lack of
budget or legal authority to use the military for immigration, including a law
against using the military for domestic law enforcement, according to former
national security adviser John Bolton.

“He couldn’t care less,” Bolton said.

Trump was generally more focused on his signature campaign promise to build a
wall on the border with Mexico, according to former officials.

“The pressure from the White House was always more about the wall,” a former
senior DHS official said. “We didn’t really get significant pressure in the
first term on deportations.”

Still, Trump would often say he wanted more deportations and listened to
immigration hard-liners, led by Miller, a former senior administration official
said. The biggest deterrent, the official said, was limited space to house
people while they were awaiting a court proceeding and not enough judges to move
the proceedings quickly.

“Every time the hard-liners would say, ‘we need to start arresting them,’ I
would say — as I said 50 times — in order to do this, we have to make all these
things happen. That was the end of any conversation,” the former senior
administration official said. “It’s not an overnight thing.”

Miller reached the conclusion that aggressive immigration enforcement had to be
implemented as quickly as possible, without losing time by considering
litigation risks, a former DHS official said. During Trump’s first term,
immigration advocates and civil liberties groups repeatedly succeeded in halting
or narrowing Trump’s policies through court challenges, and he could face
similar challenges to a mass deportation operation.

Trump has specifically cited the Eisenhower example and defended its legacy.
When CNN’s Jake Tapper noted in 2016 that many people considered it a “shameful
chapter in American history,” Trump responded: “Some people do, and some people
think it was a very effective chapter. … It was very successful, everyone said.
So I mean, that’s the way it is.”

Press reports described the operation in the summer of 1954 as “an all-out war”
with a wire-fenced “concentration camp” from which Mexicans were “herded aboard
trains.” Others were forcibly marched through miles of rattlesnake-infested
deserts or had their heads shaved — ostensibly for hygienic reasons but widely
viewed as humiliating, according to Garcia’s research. The Red Cross intervened
after many braceros, or temporary agricultural workers and laborers, were
stranded in the desert, and 88 died of sunstroke, according to Columbia
University historian Mae Ngai.

The deportations also used planes, buses and ships, including one built for up
to 90 people that was crowded with 500, leading one lawmaker to compare it to a
“penal ship.” The use of ships stopped after seven migrants drowned while trying
to escape.

The Eisenhower effort “was a one-off,” Ngai said. Trump and his allies “are
trying to figure out a way to do that in a sustained way.”


ELECTION 2024

Get the latest news on the 2024 election from our reporters on the campaign
trail and in Washington.

Who is running? The top contenders for the GOP nomination are former president
Donald Trump and former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley. For the Democrats,
President Biden is running for reelection in 2024.

Republican delegate count: GOP candidates for president compete to earn enough
delegates to secure their party’s nomination. We’re tracking the Republican 2024
delegate count.

Key issues: Compare where the candidates stand on such key issues as abortion,
climate and the economy.

Key dates and events: From January to June, voters in all states and U.S.
territories will pick their party’s nominee for president ahead of the summer
conventions. Here are key dates and events on the 2024 election calendar.

Show more
ChevronDown
Share
6004 Comments
Election 2024
HAND CURATED
 * Live updates: Haley looks beyond Saturday’s GOP primary in South Carolina
   19 minutes ago
   
   
   Live updates: Haley looks beyond Saturday’s GOP primary in South Carolina
   19 minutes ago
 * Comparing where 2024 presidential candidates stand on key issues
   November 8, 2023
   
   
   Comparing where 2024 presidential candidates stand on key issues
   November 8, 2023
 * Trump and Haley burned through cash in January, new reports show
   Earlier today
   
   
   Trump and Haley burned through cash in January, new reports show
   Earlier today

View 3 more stories



Loading...


Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan →


Advertisement



Advertisement

live updatespoliticsChevronRight

6:28 PM

TWO SENATE PRIMARIES, EACH WITH A CANDIDATE DOMINATING IN AD SPENDING

6:07 PMAnalysis: Meta is downplaying ‘political content.’ Here’s what that
really means.
5:42 PMTrump boosts Scott while talking possible VP picks
5:20 PMAnalysis: Home-state losses are rare in presidential primaries
TOP STORIES
Politics
Reporting and analysis from the Hill and the White House
Analysis|Despite N.Y. special election win, the border still dogs Biden


Analysis|Trump used to sell the perception of opulence. Now he just sells Trump.


Looming testimony of Biden relatives has high stakes for both sides


Refresh
Try a different topic

Sign in or create a free account to save your preferences
Advertisement


Advertisement

Company
About The Post Newsroom Policies & Standards Diversity & Inclusion Careers Media
& Community Relations WP Creative Group Accessibility Statement Sitemap
Get The Post
Become a Subscriber Gift Subscriptions Mobile & Apps Newsletters & Alerts
Washington Post Live Reprints & Permissions Post Store Books & E-Books Print
Archives (Subscribers Only) Today’s Paper Public Notices Coupons
Contact Us
Contact the Newsroom Contact Customer Care Contact the Opinions Team Advertise
Licensing & Syndication Request a Correction Send a News Tip Report a
Vulnerability
Terms of Use
Digital Products Terms of Sale Print Products Terms of Sale Terms of Service
Privacy Policy Cookie Settings Submissions & Discussion Policy RSS Terms of
Service Ad Choices
washingtonpost.com © 1996-2024 The Washington Post
 * washingtonpost.com
 * © 1996-2024 The Washington Post
 * About The Post
 * Contact the Newsroom
 * Contact Customer Care
 * Request a Correction
 * Send a News Tip
 * Report a Vulnerability
 * Download the Washington Post App
 * Policies & Standards
 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Settings
 * Print Products Terms of Sale
 * Digital Products Terms of Sale
 * Submissions & Discussion Policy
 * RSS Terms of Service
 * Ad Choices
 * Coupons

5.12.2






Already have an account? Sign in

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


TWO WAYS TO READ THIS ARTICLE:

Create an account or sign in
Free
 * Access this article

Enter email address
By selecting "Start reading," you agree to The Washington Post's Terms of
Service and Privacy Policy.
The Washington Post may use my email address to provide me occasional special
offers via email and through other platforms. I can opt out at any time.

Start reading
Subscribe
€2every 4 weeks
 * Unlimited access to all articles
 * Save stories to read later

Subscribe



WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

We and our 46 partners store and/or access information on a device, such as
unique IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your
choices by clicking below, including your right to object where legitimate
interest is used, or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will
be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data.

If you click “I accept,” in addition to processing data using cookies and
similar technologies for the purposes to the right, you also agree we may
process the profile information you provide and your interactions with our
surveys and other interactive content for personalized advertising.

If you do not accept, we will process cookies and associated data for strictly
necessary purposes and process non-cookie data as set forth in our Privacy
Policy (consistent with law and, if applicable, other choices you have made).


WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS COOKIE DATA TO PROVIDE:

Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Create profiles for
personalised advertising. Use profiles to select personalised advertising.
Create profiles to personalise content. Use profiles to select personalised
content. Measure advertising performance. Measure content performance.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different
sources. Develop and improve services. Store and/or access information on a
device. Use limited data to select content. Use limited data to select
advertising. List of Partners (vendors)

I Accept Reject All Show Purposes