www.npr.org
Open in
urlscan Pro
2600:141b:f000:487::1155
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.npr.org/2023/04/07/1159220452/abortion-pill-drug-mifepristone-judge-texas-amarillo
Submission: On April 08 via manual from US — Scanned from US
Submission: On April 08 via manual from US — Scanned from US
Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOMText Content
Accessibility links * Skip to main content * Keyboard shortcuts for audio player WQLNOn Air Now * Hourly News * Listen Live * Playlist * Open Navigation Menu * * WQLN * Listen LiveWQLN * donate * Change Sign in or register to see your station everywhere you enjoy NPR. * Sign In * NPR Shop * Donate > Close Navigation Menu * Home * News Expand/collapse submenu for News * National * World * Politics * Business * Health * Science * Climate * Race * Culture Expand/collapse submenu for Culture * Books * Movies * Television * Pop Culture * Food * Art & Design * Performing Arts * Life Kit * Music Expand/collapse submenu for Music * Tiny Desk * #NowPlaying * All Songs Considered * Music Features * Live Sessions * Podcasts & Shows Expand/collapse submenu for Podcasts & Shows Daily * Morning Edition * Weekend Edition Saturday * Weekend Edition Sunday * All Things Considered * Fresh Air * Up First Featured * Taking Cover * Louder Than A Riot * It's Been a Minute * Life Kit * More Podcasts & Shows * Search * Sign In * NPR Shop * * Tiny Desk * #NowPlaying * All Songs Considered * Music Features * Live Sessions * About NPR * Diversity * Organization * Support * Careers * Connect * Press * Ethics Abortion pill access in jeopardy after judges issue conflicting rulings A federal judge in Texas stayed the FDA's approval of the drug mifepristone, while a federal judge in Washington state blocked any FDA change in access. HEALTH JUDGES' DUELING DECISIONS PUT ACCESS TO A KEY ABORTION DRUG IN JEOPARDY NATIONWIDE * Facebook * Twitter * Flipboard * Email Updated April 8, 20235:45 AM ET Originally published April 7, 20237:41 PM ET Heard on All Things Considered Sarah McCammon JUDGES' DUELING DECISIONS PUT ACCESS TO A KEY ABORTION DRUG IN JEOPARDY NATIONWIDE Listen· 3:343-Minute ListenPlaylist Toggle more options * Download * Embed Embed <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/1159220452/1168770851" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player"> * Transcript Enlarge this image Mifepristone is part of a two-drug protocol that a recent study showed was used in 98% of medication abortions in 2020. Allen G. Breed/AP hide caption toggle caption Allen G. Breed/AP Mifepristone is part of a two-drug protocol that a recent study showed was used in 98% of medication abortions in 2020. Allen G. Breed/AP Federal judges in two states issued contradictory decisions Friday evening that could drastically impact access to a drug used in nearly all medication abortions in the U.S. In Texas, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled that the Food and Drug Administration improperly approved the abortion pill mifepristone more than 20 years ago. A coalition of anti-abortion rights groups called the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine sued the FDA last year. The judge issued a nationwide injunction pausing the FDA's approval, which is set to take effect in seven days. Within hours of that decision, U.S. District Judge Thomas O. Rice issued a ruling in a separate case in Washington state. That lawsuit filed by a coalition of Democratic attorneys general in 17 states and the District of Columbia sought to block the FDA from pulling the drug from the market. Rice's decision blocks the FDA from "altering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone." Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson told NPR on Friday that he believes the judge's ruling could make it possible for patients in those states to continue using mifepristone for abortion in the short term — even after the Texas decision takes effect. Sponsor Message "If you live in Washington State or one of the 17 states that joined Washington in our lawsuit...then the judge's ruling in our case preserves the status quo on ensuring that access to mifepristone remains available," Ferguson said. For the rest, he said, "The Texas judge's ruling seriously has the potential to eliminate that access for mifepristone here in the coming days." Most abortions already are illegal in about a dozen of those states, including Texas, following last summer's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. Hours after the Texas ruling, the Justice Department appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which has a reputation for being a conservative jurisdiction. The Justice Department says it is also reviewing the decision in Washington state. HEALTH CARE FEDERAL JUDGE IN TEXAS HEARS CASE THAT COULD FORCE A MAJOR ABORTION PILL OFF MARKET President Biden said the ruling in Texas could have widespread consequences. "If this ruling were to stand, then there will be virtually no prescription, approved by the FDA, that would be safe from these kinds of political, ideological attacks," the president said in a statement. "It is the next big step toward the national ban on abortion that Republican elected officials have vowed to make law in America," Biden added. He said that the administration would fight the ruling, noting, "The Department of Justice has already filed an appeal and will seek an immediate stay of the decision." Anti-abortion rights groups hailed the Texas decision. "By illegally approving dangerous chemical abortion drugs, the FDA put women and girls in harm's way, and it's high time the agency is held accountable for its reckless actions," Erik Baptist, senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom, said in a statement. Mifepristone was approved by the FDA in 2000 for use in combination with a second drug, misoprostol. More than half of all abortions in the United States are done using medication, as opposed to a surgical procedure, and the two-drug combination was used for 98% of them in 2020, according to the Guttmacher Institute. Major medical groups say mifepristone, which is also used in miscarriage management, has a well-established safety record and have been calling for relaxing restrictions on its use for years. POLITICS WHY AN ULCER DRUG COULD BE THE LAST OPTION FOR MANY ABORTION PATIENTS In its lawsuit, the coalition of abortion rights opponents said the protocol was improperly approved by the FDA. The group had asked Kacsmaryk, who was appointed by President Trump and has longstanding ties to conservative religious groups, to overturn the approval. The decision in that lawsuit comes three weeks after Kacsmaryk held a hearing in Amarillo in a courtroom that had room for only a few dozen members of the public and the press. No recording or public livestreaming was permitted. NATIONWIDE IMPLICATIONS NATIONAL READ THE TRANSCRIPT: WHAT HAPPENED INSIDE THE FEDERAL HEARING ON ABORTION PILLS Abortion providers nationwide say they've been preparing to rely on another medication abortion regimen using misoprostol alone. Misoprostol is prescribed primarily for ulcers, and is already widely used off-label for other gynecological purposes in the United States. Research suggests the single-drug regimen is somewhat less effective and often causes additional side effects. But the World Health Organization says the method, which has been used internationally for decades, can be safe and effective at the appropriate dosage. The decision likely will mean uncertainty and confusion for doctors and patients, says Farah Diaz-Tello, senior counsel with the reproductive rights legal advocacy group If/When/How. "People who are seeking an abortion with pills ... are going to find it much more difficult to do so, especially in the time period as providers figure out what they're going to be able to do," she says. "So I think we're going to see an immediate exacerbation of the crisis of access that already started in June of 2022" with the U.S. Supreme Court decision last year in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned decades of abortion-rights precedent. Diaz-Tello predicts more people will look to induce their own abortions without medical supervision, using medications obtained online or in other countries. She also worries about the risk of increased scrutiny of patients seeking medical care for emergency complications from either self-managed abortions or miscarriages. NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL SUE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION OVER ABORTION PILL RULES She says there are no state laws to her knowledge that require healthcare providers to turn in patients suspected of inducing an abortion, but she worries the ruling will fuel confusion and misinformation. "I am worried that ... that is going to translate into a misunderstanding that is going to lead to the criminalization of people who end their pregnancies," Diaz-Tello says. DUELING DECISIONS The implications of the Texas ruling is complicated by the outcome of the Washington state lawsuit. Prior to the rulings being issued, Amanda Allen, senior counsel and director for the The Lawyering Project, which supports abortion rights, told NPR that the prospect of "two very conflicting orders" from federal courts "could impose very different obligations on the FDA that would be very untenable for the FDA to try to reconcile." Allen said the FDA could decide to issue guidance for prescribers about how to interpret the rulings. But she says such a conflict between the federal courts might well end up before the U.S. Supreme Court. Lawyers and advocates on both sides of the case say it is likely to move quickly through the federal appeals process. "Everyone's eyes are now kind of pointed back towards D.C.," said Katie Glenn Daniel, state policy director with Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America. "We anticipate that eventually, whether it's the merits of this case, or these injunctions — now dueling injunctions — that the Supreme Court will have to weigh in in some way." * mifepristone * misoprostol * Abortion rights * Supreme Court * Facebook * Twitter * Flipboard * Email MORE STORIES FROM NPR HEALTH MORE POLLEN, MORE ALLERGIES: EXPOSURE THERAPY IN SEVERAL FORMS TREATS SYMPTOMS POLITICS HOW A NEW MAJORITY ON WISCONSIN'S SUPREME COURT COULD IMPACT REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH HEALTH CLINICS OFFERING ABORTIONS FACE A RISE IN THREATS, VIOLENCE AND LEGAL BATTLES HEALTH FDA PULLS THE ONLY APPROVED DRUG FOR PREVENTING PREMATURE BIRTH OFF THE MARKET HEALTH A GOOD FRIDAY FUNERAL IN TEXAS. BABY HALO'S PARENTS HAD FEW CHOICES IN POST-ROE TEXAS GLOBAL HEALTH TEENS, TRUST AND THE ETHICS OF CHATGPT: A BOLD WISH LIST FOR WHO AS IT TURNS 75 POPULAR ON NPR.ORG TECHNOLOGY ELON MUSK SAYS NPR'S 'STATE-AFFILIATED MEDIA' LABEL MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN ACCURATE POLITICS TENNESSEE HOUSE VOTES TO EXPEL 2 OF 3 DEMOCRATIC MEMBERS OVER GUN PROTEST LAW JUSTICE THOMAS EXPLAINS WHY HE DIDN'T REPORT TRIPS PAID FOR BY BILLIONAIRE NATIONAL A UTAH ICE CLIMBER WAS KILLED BY FALLING ICE AFTER SAVING HER FRIEND'S LIFE NATIONAL SECURITY TOP-SECRET PENTAGON DOCUMENTS ON UKRAINE WAR APPEAR ON SOCIAL MEDIA MOVIES 3 NEW STAR WARS LIVE-ACTION FILMS ARE COMING NPR EDITORS' PICKS POLITICS TRUMP WASN'T PUT UNDER A GAG ORDER, BUT HE WAS TOLD TO WATCH HIS WORDS NATIONAL A CALIFORNIA BILL WOULD CREATE AN ALERT SYSTEM FOR MISSING BLACK WOMEN AND YOUTH ASIA CHINA FLIES FIGHTER JETS NEAR TAIWAN AFTER THE LEADER'S TRIP TO THE U.S. YOUR MONEY DEAR LK: MY BOYFRIEND'S PARENTS PAY FOR EVERYTHING. IT MAKES ME UNCOMFORTABLE POP CULTURE WHAT'S MAKING US HAPPY: A GUIDE TO YOUR WEEKEND READING, LISTENING AND VIEWING CLIMATE WHY CALIFORNIA'S FLOODS MAY BE 'ONLY A TASTE' OF WHAT'S TO COME IN A WARMER WORLD READ & LISTEN * Home * News * Culture * Music * Podcasts & Shows CONNECT * Newsletters * Facebook * Twitter * Instagram * Press * Contact & Help ABOUT NPR * Overview * Diversity * Accessibility * Ethics * Finances * Public Editor * Corrections GET INVOLVED * Support Public Radio * Sponsor NPR * NPR Careers * NPR Shop * NPR Events * NPR Extra * Terms of Use * Privacy * Your Privacy Choices * Text Only * © 2023 npr Sponsor Message Become an NPR sponsor COOKIE SETTINGS When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You may opt out of the sharing of your information with our sponsorship vendors for delivery of personalized sponsorship credits and marketing messages on our website or third-party sites by turning off "Share Data for Targeted Sponsorship" below. If you opt out, our service providers or vendors may continue to serve you non-personalized, non-"interest-based" sponsorship credits and marketing messages on our website or third-party sites, and those sponsorship credits and marketing message may come with cookies that are used to control how often you encounter those credits and messages, to prevent fraud, and to do aggregate reporting. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link. Allow All MANAGE CONSENT PREFERENCES STRICTLY NECESSARY OR ESSENTIAL COOKIES Always Active These cookies are essential to provide you with services available through the NPR Services and to enable you to use some of their features. These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually set in response to actions made by you that amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. Without these cookies, the services that you have asked for cannot be provided, and we only use these cookies to provide you with those services. SHARE DATA FOR TARGETED SPONSORSHIP Share Data for Targeted Sponsorship You may opt out of the sharing of your information with our sponsorship vendors for delivery of personalized sponsorship credits and marketing messages on our website or third-party sites by turning off "Share Data for Targeted Sponsorship." If you opt out, our service providers or vendors may continue to serve you non-personalized, non-"interest-based" sponsorship credits and marketing messages on our website or third-party sites, and those sponsorship credits and marketing message may come with cookies that are used to control how often you encounter those credits and messages, to prevent fraud, and to do aggregate reporting. * PERFORMANCE AND ANALYTICS COOKIES Switch Label These cookies are used to collect information about traffic to our Services and how users interact with the NPR Services. The information collected includes the number of visitors to the NPR Services, the websites that referred visitors to the NPR Services, the pages that they visited on the NPR Services, what time of day they visited the NPR Services, whether they have visited the NPR Services before, and other similar information. We use this information to help operate the NPR Services more efficiently, to gather broad demographic information and to monitor the level of activity on the NPR Services. NPR's third-party service providers that measure and analyze the use of the NPR Services for NPR also use their own cookies. NPR's third-party analytics service providers use cookies across multiple sites to collect visitor data (such as data related to age, gender and visitor interests). * FUNCTIONAL COOKIES Switch Label These cookies allow NPR Services to remember choices you make when you use them, such as remembering your Member station preferences and remembering your account details. The purpose of these cookies is to provide you with a more personal experience and to avoid you having to re-enter your preferences every time you visit the NPR Services. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly. * TARGETING AND SPONSOR COOKIES Switch Label These cookies track your browsing habits or other information, such as location, to enable us to show sponsorship credits which are more likely to be of interest to you. These cookies use information about your browsing history to group you with other users who have similar interests. Based on that information, and with our permission, we and our sponsors can place cookies to enable us or our sponsors to show sponsorship credits and other messages that we think will be relevant to your interests while you are using third-party services. NPR works with third-party vendors that may serve sponsorship credits or other messages to you on other websites after you visit the NPR Services. These third-party vendors use their own cookies to recognize you as an NPR Services visitor and to serve you sponsorship credits or other messages on other websites that they believe you will find most relevant. If you do not allow these cookies, you may still receive sponsorship or marketing messages, but they may not be targeted to your interests. Back Button PERFORMANCE COOKIES Search Icon Filter Icon Clear checkbox label label Apply Cancel Consent Leg.Interest checkbox label label checkbox label label checkbox label label Confirm My Choices