www.nea.org Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700::6810:caf1  Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

/search

<form action="/search" class="header__search-fields u-input-text-focus-primary-medium-dark" role="search">
  <div class="input-text__wrapper">
    <label for="header-search" class="visuallyhidden"> Search </label>
    <input type="text" class="input-text js-hide-show-focus" name="keys" id="header-search" autocomplete="off">
    <div class="autocomplete-results">
      <h4> Suggested Results </h4>
      <ul class="autocomplete-results__list"></ul>
      <a href="" class="autocomplete-results__see-all">See All</a>
    </div>
  </div>
  <button type="submit" class="btn--large btn"> Search </button>
</form>

POST all-news-articles

<form class="clearfix" method="post" novalidate="" action="all-news-articles" accept-charset="utf-8" autocomplete="on">
  <div data-name="undefined" data-subview="submit_view" data-subview-index="0"></div>
  <fieldset class="at-fieldset ContactInformation" id="NVSignupForm538944-ContactInformation">
    <legend class="at-legend">Contact Information</legend>
    <div class="at-fields">
      <div class="at-row FirstName LastName"><label class="at-text   FirstName" id="NVSignupForm538944-ContactInformation-FirstName">First Name<input type="text" autocomplete="given-name" x-autocompletetype="given-name" required=""
            title="First Name (required)" name="FirstName" value="" maxlength="20">
        </label><label class="at-text   LastName" id="NVSignupForm538944-ContactInformation-LastName">Last Name<input type="text" autocomplete="family-name" x-autocompletetype="surname" required="" title="Last Name (required)" name="LastName"
            value="" maxlength="25">
        </label></div>
      <div class="at-row at-row-solo PostalCode"><label class="at-text   PostalCode" id="NVSignupForm538944-ContactInformation-PostalCode">Zip Code<input type="tel" autocomplete="postal-code" x-autocompletetype="postal-code"
            pattern="^\d{5}([\-]\d{4})?$" required="" title="Zip Code (required)" name="PostalCode" value="" maxlength="10">
        </label></div>
      <div class="at-row at-row-solo EmailAddress"><label class="at-text   EmailAddress" id="NVSignupForm538944-ContactInformation-EmailAddress">Email<input type="email" autocomplete="email" x-autocompletetype="email"
            pattern="^([\w!#$%&amp;'*+\-\/=?\^`\{\|\}~]+\.)*[\w!#$%&amp;'*+\-\/=?\^`\{\|\}~]+@((((([a-zA-Z0-9]{1}[a-zA-Z0-9\-]{0,62}[a-zA-Z0-9]{1})|[a-zA-Z])\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,62})|(\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}(:\d{1,5})?)$" required="" title="Email (required)"
            name="EmailAddress" value="" maxlength="100" placeholder="email@email.com">
        </label></div>
      <div class="at-row at-row-solo at-row-full YesSignMeUpForUpdatesForBinder"><label class="at-check  YesSignMeUpForUpdatesForBinder" id="NVSignupForm538944-ContactInformation-YesSignMeUpForUpdatesForBinder"><input type="checkbox" required=""
            name="YesSignMeUpForUpdatesForBinder"> <span class="at-checkbox-title-container"><span class="at-checkbox-title" id="NVSignupForm538944-ContactInformation-YesSignMeUpForUpdatesForBinder-label">Opt in to email updates from
              NEA</span></span>
        </label></div>
      <div class="at-row "><label class="at-text   PersonalUrl" id="NVSignupForm538944-ContactInformation-PersonalUrl"> <small>(Optional)</small><input type="text" autocomplete="on" false="" title="" name="PersonalUrl" value="" maxlength="">
        </label></div>
      <div class="at-row ">
        <div class="at-markup TrackingPixel" id="NVSignupForm538944-ContactInformation-TrackingPixel" style="display: none;"><img alt=""
            src="https://secure.ngpvan.com/v1/Track/hzszcwRk60GL3WWGaCAXPA2?formSessionId=318255ae-08db-422f-9ea0-6a4e731af4b0&amp;bName=chrome&amp;dType=desktop&amp;formVersion=4/27/2022 8:53:26 PM|&amp;fUrl=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubmVhLm9yZy9uZWEtdG9kYXkvYWxsLW5ld3MtYXJ0aWNsZXMvcGlzYS0yMDIy&amp;fRef="
            style="display:none"></div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </fieldset>
  <div class="at-form-submit clearfix">
    <input type="submit" value="Subscribe" class="at-submit btn-at btn-at-primary">
    <div class="at-markup secure-processing-single-step-div" style="display: none;">
      <label class="secure-processing-label at-text"> Your donation will be securely processed.<div class="glyphicons glyphicons-lock" aria-hidden="true"></div>
      </label>
    </div>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

Skip to Cookie banner
Skip Navigation
Menu
Close
 * Student Success
 * Your Rights & Workplace
 * Professional Excellence
 * Advocating for Change
 * Join Our Movement

Take Action
Search nea.org …


SEARCH

Close
Search

SUGGESTED RESULTS

See All
Search
 * About NEA
 * NEA Affiliates
 * Media Center
 * NEA Member Benefits
 * Resource Library
 * NEA Today
   * All News & Articles
   * Topics
   * NEA Today Magazines

More NEA Sites
 * EdVotes
 * EdCommunities
 * NEA Foundation

Contact Us
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Great Public Schools Engaged Families & Communities School Health & Safety
Recruit & Retain Educators Teacher Quality Student Assessments
Fair Pay & Benefits Union & Educator Voice Student Debt Support Inclusive
Workplaces Resource Library
Just & Equitable Schools Student Engagement Professional Learning Leadership
Development Conferences & Events
Action Center Racial & Social Justice Funding for Students & Schools Educator
Pay & Benefits Every Student Succeeds Act New From NEA
Become A Member Become a Community Ally Connect with Us Join a Campaign Donate
Our Mission, Vision, & Values Our Leaders Our Members Governance & Policies
Partnerships Contact Us Grants & Funding
Press Releases
All News & Articles Topics NEA Today Magazines
 * All News & Articles
 * Topics
    * Topics
       * Education Policy
       * Health, Wellness, & Safety
       * Professional Practice
       * Racial & Social Justice
       * Salary & Workplace Conditions

 * NEA Today Magazines
    * NEA Today Magazines
       * NEA Today
       * NEA Today for NEA-Retired Members
       * NEA Today for Aspiring Educators
       * NEA Today Past Issues

Home NEA Today All News & Articles
NEA News


WHAT CAN WE REALLY LEARN FROM THE 2022 PISA TEST RESULTS?

An education policy, research, and advocacy expert shares insights on the latest
Program for International Student Assessment.

By: Cindy Long, Senior Writer
Published: January 19, 2024
Share
 * 
 * 


KEY TAKEAWAYS

 1. Headlines about the U.S. performance were grim, but American students moved
    up in rankings relative to other countries.
 2. More of a measure of childhood poverty than academic achievement,
    standardized tests like PISA are misleading to the public.
 3. Research shows there is no statistically significant relationships between
    indicators associated with the innovation economy, GDP, adjusted gross
    income, or purchasing power and PISA.

When the international PISA scores were released last fall, the headlines were
grim with reports of “tanking math scores” and “fears of mental decline” among
American students as well as those around the world. 

PISA, the Program for International Student Assessment, is a worldwide study by
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development intended to evaluate
educational systems by measuring 15-year-old school students’ performance in
mathematics, science, and reading. 

But is there really cause to sound the alarms? To find out more, NEA Today spoke
to Harry Feder, executive director of the National Center for Fair & Open
Testing, also known as FairTest. Since 1985, FairTest has worked to end the
misuse and overuse of standardized testing and to ensure that assessment of
students, teachers and schools is fair, open, valid, equitable and educationally
beneficial. 

After the PISA scores were released, there were many news reports about how math
scores dropped dramatically and reading scores stagnated. What is your reaction
to the news coverage? 

Harry Feder: The results of PISA 2022 should, like all standardized test
results, be filtered through a lens of skepticism about the claims of the test
producers and administrators. We must also carefully scrutinize “Chicken Little”
claims in the media, which is notorious for manufacturing and hyping education
crises. 

Declines in standardized test scores have been the premise for all the
failed education reforms of the past forty years, from the publication of “A
Nation at Risk” and the No Child Left Behind Act to the charter school movement
and now, pushes for universal vouchers and privatization. We must guard against
this trap yet again. 

Despite grim headlines about “tanking” math scores, the United States did not do
terribly relative to other OECD countries in terms of rankings. U.S. students
moved up in rankings for all three subjects (math, reading and science). And in
aggregate scores, the United States held its ground in reading and science
pretty well from the previous administration while other countries' scores went
down

What external factors should be considered when looking at the PISA scores? 

HF: By scrutinizing the performance of the United States versus other OECD 
countries, the unsurprising conclusion should be that the PISA test is largely
a measure of childhood poverty rates rather than academic achievement.  

The United States leads the OECD in child poverty. Our rate of child poverty
is approximately 26%, or higher by some measures. Thus, it is not surprising
that as a nation we do not perform as well as most other OECD countries on PISA.
If you only compare the percentage of American schools with poverty rates that
is equal to those of other OECD countries, the United States does quite well. 

For example, in reading, countries at the top of the PISA list– Slovenia (499),
Denmark (489), and Finland (474) have childhood poverty rates below 10%. If one
were to measure just the U.S. schools with poverty rates under 10%, our average
score would be 562, which would place the U.S. first globally.  

In mathematics, Germany, France and the United Kingdom have child poverty rates
between 15 and 18% and have scores of 475, 479 and 489 respectively. If you
measured only the US schools with childhood poverty rates of 10-25%, we would
score a 508, which would place the U.S. fourth in the OECD. (The U.S. actual
score was 465). 

America’s problem on PISA is poverty and inequality, not curriculum
and instruction. 

How is an assessment like PISA misleading for the public? 

HF: PISA is a scaled score, norm-referenced, multiple-choice test. Two-thirds of
all test takers globally score between 400 and 600 on a section (math, reading
and science). Only 2% score over 700. In general, these kinds of tests are set
up so results will go down over a longer time frame because as explained by
Prof. Andy Hargreaves of Boston College, “once a metric is widely used and has a
competitive ranking element, gaming the system leads to overall declines in
performance after an early lift, and also has negative side-effects on
well-being.”  

So it is not surprising that during the last two decades student performance in
mathematics, reading and science all significantly declined in most OECD
countries. 

Many point to the COVID pandemic as a cause for lower scores, but PISA pointed
to another widespread phenomenon. What was that? 

HF: If one were looking for an actual reason for this decline besides test
design and use, the proliferation of technology and handheld device usage by
15-year-olds may very well be the culprit.  

The PISA report offers three reasons to support this. 

First, PISA finds that students who spend less than one hour of “leisure” time
on digital devices a day at school scored about 50 points higher in math than
students who are on their screens more than five hours a day.  

> Despite grim headlines about “tanking” math scores, the United States did not
> do terribly relative to other OECD countries in terms of rankings. U.S.
> students moved up in rankings for all three subjects (math, reading and
> science). And in aggregate scores, the United States held its ground in
> reading and science pretty well from the previous administration while other
> countries' scores went down

Second, Andreas Schleicher, the director of the PISA survey, wrote that students
who reported feeling distracted by their classmates’ digital habits (65%) scored
lower in math.  

Finally, nearly half of students (45%) across the OECD said that they felt
“nervous” or “anxious” when they didn’t have their digital devices near them. 

Samuel Abrams, who heads the National Center for the Study of Privatization in
Education at Teachers College, Columbia University, attributes Finland’s decline
in PISA scores to the introduction of the iPhone and its proliferation of use
among Finnish teens over the past several years. 

The OECD is to be commended for attempting to analyze the extent to which
creativity and innovation are promoted in national school systems, but the
Creativity and Innovation review did not include the United States. The PISA
team found it difficult to extract data about the state of creative thinking in
American schools because education is delegated by the states to many, often
small, local school districts.  

They did cite the work of EL Education, a nonprofit organization with a network
of public schools committed to performance-based assessment, as an example of
creative and innovative schooling designed to get students to think critically,
communicate clearly, and create complex work. 

Overall, the report stated that within the limitations of a snapshot review “it
has not been possible to do justice to the rich variety of experiences in
schools in the USA.” 

Should the PISA assessment really mean anything for American students and
educators?  

HF: Not really, but you wouldn’t know it from the weight policy makers and media
ascribe to the results. Researchers have shown that there are no statistically
significant relationships between indicators associated with the innovation
economy, GDP, adjusted gross income, or purchasing power and PISA.  

International tests do not provide meaningful information about the skills most
important for full participation in society in terms of socio-civic and economic
outcomes in the G20 countries.  

The information tested on international tests is not the information children
will need to compete in the innovation economy and the results do not tell us
important information about student proficiency with the vocational competencies
necessary to create, innovate, and pursue entrepreneurial opportunities.  

What can be learned from the most recent PISA scores? 

HF: The COVID pandemic caused disruption and trauma for everyone around the
world.  

The PISA scores provide some evidence of what we already knew–the pandemic was
bad for kids everywhere.  


REFERENCES

See More See Less



LEARN MORE

 * 1 What Do Students Want to Read? It Might Not Be What You Think
 * 2 Third Graders Celebrate Read Across America with Juana Medina
 * 3 No Diverse Books in the School Library? These Paraeducators Changed That!


DO MORE

 * 1 NEA LGBTQ+ Resources
 * 2 Implicit Bias, Microaggressions, and Stereotypes Resources
 * 3 Sample Proclamation for Local Government


GET MORE FROM

 * 
 * 
 * 

We're here to help you succeed in your career, advocate for public school
students, and stay up to date on the latest education news. Sign up to stay
informed.
NEW nea.org email signup


Contact Information
First Name Last Name
Zip Code
Email
Opt in to email updates from NEA
(Optional)

Your donation will be securely processed.







GREAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR EVERY STUDENT

The National Education Association (NEA), the nation's largest professional
employee organization, is committed to advancing the cause of public education.
NEA's 3 million members work at every level of education—from pre-school to
university graduate programs. NEA has affiliate organizations in every state and
in more than 14,000 communities across the United States.
About us
Partner with us
Advertise with us
National Education Association
1201 16th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036-3290

 * * Careers
   * Contact Us
   * NEA State Affiliates
 * * NEA Councils & Other Organizations
   * Governance & Policies
   * Research & Publications
 * * Legal Guidance
   * Resource Library

 * Privacy Policy
 * Terms of Use

© Copyright 2024 National Education Association