eu.indystar.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
151.101.130.62
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://www.indystar.com/story/news/local/2022/10/24/crane-army-ammunition-activity-whistleblower-says-reporting-safety-v...
Effective URL: https://eu.indystar.com/story/news/local/2022/10/24/crane-army-ammunition-activity-whistleblower-says-reporting-safety-v...
Submission: On October 08 via manual from US — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://eu.indystar.com/story/news/local/2022/10/24/crane-army-ammunition-activity-whistleblower-says-reporting-safety-v...
Submission: On October 08 via manual from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOMText Content
Skip to main content * Home * Crime * Business * Indiana Politics * Investigations * Elections * Education * Season for Sharing * USA TODAY Crane whistleblower alleges safety violations with explosives at Indiana base CRANE WHISTLEBLOWER ALLEGES SAFETY VIOLATIONS WITH EXPLOSIVES AT INDIANA BASE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Boris Ladwig The Herald-Times A whistleblower and former safety chief at Crane Army Ammunition Activity said after he warned a federal agency of possible explosions and deaths at the facility, government agents destroyed evidence and fired him in retaliation. Rick Ward said safety violations first identified after a 2013 explosion that hospitalized five people continue to endanger people at the southern Indiana military installation. “We’re talking catastrophic type stuff here,” he said. “I want to see people not die.” An Army spokesman said via email the Army takes workspace safety “very seriously” and its investigation revealed no personnel at Crane “were in immediate danger of being seriously injured.” From the archive: Safety violations found at Crane Army division during March accident Ward in October 2020 filed a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration alleging the Army had failed to address several safety violations, some of which date back to OSHA's investigation after the 2013 explosion. Ward said last week that the U.S. military still is failing to follow proper procedures at Crane, including the handling of explosives. He said personnel at the facility in some cases are moving explosives with chains and slings that have not been inspected or certified for years. If those chains or slings fail, the bombs can drop, which Ward said has happened. The bombs could explode, blow up buildings and kill workers. “They’re just sloppy,” he said. “They don’t follow (standard operating procedures.)” Ward said people were injured by explosives at Crane on several occasions during his time there. In July, failure to follow proper procedures contributed to a “huge fire,” he said. News reports at the time indicated no one was hurt and the cause of the fire was under investigation. WHAT DO THEY DO AT THE CRANE? Crane is about a 30-minute drive southwest of Bloomington. The installation on its website says its mission is to "safely receive, inspect, store, ship, renovate, demilitarize, and manufacture conventional ammunition, missiles, and related components to support Army and Joint Force readiness." Marshall Z. Howell, spokesman for the Army, said via email that due to ongoing litigation and privacy protections, he could not answer all questions, but he said the Army takes workplace safety "very seriously, especially when it comes to inherently dangerous activities such as ammunition handling and production." "The matters raised by Mr. Ward were properly investigated by the Army; these investigations did not indicate that any personnel at CAAA were in imminent danger of being seriously injured," Howell said. "However, we always encourage our employees to identify areas where the command can improve, especially in the areas of life, health and safety." WHISTLEBLOWER: ACCIDENT AVOIDED ONLY BY CHANCE Ward is a major with four years of active military duty and 22 years in the reserves. He served most recently as the installation’s civilian safety chief. He said the installation has avoided another catastrophic incident only by chance. Ward said unless the U.S. military addresses the concerns, a deadly incident is only a matter of time. “I’d like to see the problems (solved) that have been swept under the rug for a decade,” he said. “People need to be held accountable.” Nearby:A Monroe County builder is constructing $250,000 homes. Find out where. The U.S. Army investigated Ward’s complaint after the former safety chief took his case to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, an independent federal investigative and prosecutorial agency that derives its authority in part from the Whistleblower Protection Act. A letter that U.S. Special Counsel Henry J. Kerner sent to President Joe Biden and Congressional leaders this month indicates the Army’s investigation substantiated, either fully or partially, five of eight allegations Ward made. The letter also states that as a result of the report’s findings, the Army will, among other things, contract for a new hazard analysis/risk assessment of roughly 2,000 areas and review all weight handling equipment “to ensure any equipment with outdated inspections or certifications is tagged inactive and not used.” Ward said the remaining issues he identified were not substantiated only because the Army fixed them after his complaint. 'EVIDENCE OF WRONGDOING' A news release from Washington, D.C.-based law firm Tully Rinckey, which Ward had hired, also alleges “government evidence of wrongdoing, including pictures, was destroyed by the command when Mr. Ward was sent home and his phone and computer were confiscated.” Ward, who has worked for the U.S. Department of Defense for almost 20 years, was fired on Jan. 5, 2021, on what he says are “fabricated” misconduct charges. Howell, the Army spokesman, said because of Privacy Act protections, he could not provide details on Ward's federal employment. "We can say that claims of safety violations played no role in any personnel decision," Howell said. The release from the law firm also states that three days after Ward filed the OSHA complaint “he was assigned to investigate his own complaint. Due to COVID restrictions, OSHA did not send anyone to investigate.” “They used COVID as an excuse,” said Dan Meyer, an alumnus of Indiana University's law school and now managing partner at law firm Tully Rinckey. Even now, the agency won’t send out anyone to investigate the complaint, he said. OSHA could not be reached for comment. Ward said he wants to see the long-lingering problems fixed. And ultimately, he wants his job at Crane back. The U.S. military has revoked his security clearance and prohibited him from entering the military installation on threat of arrest, he said. Ward now works for a private military contractor, but the job will require him to soon move out of state and away from his wife and children who want to remain in Indiana. Meyer said to reduce the risk of another serious mishap, someone outside of the U.S. Department of Defense should investigate Ward’s complaint and affirm publicly when all of the safety violations have been corrected. Meyer said the lack of a response also sends a chilling message to other potential whistleblowers: Why would anyone step forward and risk reprisals if complaints about serious safety violations fall on deaf ears? Boris Ladwig can be reached at bladwig@heraldt.com. Facebook Twitter Email Share your feedback to help improve our site! * Help * Terms of Service * Subscription Terms & Conditions * Your California Privacy Rights/Privacy Policy * Privacy Policy * Site Map * Accessibility * Our Ethical Principles * Manage Cookies © Copyright Gannett 2023 ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY Clicking on the "Reject All" Button retains the default setting of only strictly necessary cookies. We and our partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your choices by clicking below or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data.Privacy Policy WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS DATA TO ANALYZE WEBSITE PERFORMANCE AND TO DO THE FOLLOWING: Create a personalised content profile. Develop and improve products. Store and/or access information on a device. Create a personalised ads profile. Precise geolocation data, and identification through device scanning. Personalised ads and content display, ad and content measurement, and audience insights. List of Partners (vendors) Reject All Accept All Manage Cookies