lawprofessors.typepad.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
104.18.118.121
Public Scan
URL:
https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/appellate_advocacy/2018/11/grammar-bots-can-help-you-step-up-your-legal-writing.html
Submission Tags: falconsandbox
Submission: On June 26 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Submission Tags: falconsandbox
Submission: On June 26 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
5 forms found in the DOMGET https://www.google.com/search
<form method="get" action="https://www.google.com/search">
<i class="icon-search"></i> <input placeholder="Enter Search Term" type="text" name="q" class="gn-search">
<input type="submit" value="Go!" class="btn btn-small">
<input type="hidden" name="domains" value="https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/appellate_advocacy/">
<input type="hidden" name="sitesearch" value="https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/appellate_advocacy/">
</form>
GET https://www.google.com/search
<form method="get" action="https://www.google.com/search">
<div class="input-append">
<input type="text" name="q" placeholder="Search Terms">
<button type="submit" name="btnG" class="btn">Go!</button>
<input type="hidden" name="domains" value="https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/appellate_advocacy/">
<input type="hidden" name="sitesearch" value="https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/appellate_advocacy/">
</div>
</form>
POST
<form id="comment-preview-form" method="post" onsubmit="atpComments.interceptPost(1); return false;">
<input type="submit" class="form-control font-entrybody" name="post" id="comment-confirm-post" value=" Post " onclick="atpComments.interceptPost(1); return false;">
<input type="submit" class="form-control font-entrybody" name="edit" id="comment-edit" value=" Edit " onclick="atpComments.previewOnly(2); return false;">
<span id="previewFormSpinner" class="hiddenBox"><img src="/.shared/images/spinner.gif" alt="Working..."></span>
</form>
POST
<form id="comment-captcha-form" method="post" onsubmit="atpComments.submitWithReCaptcha(); return false;">
<div id="recaptcha_content">
<noscript>
<iframe src="6Ldg1s4SAAAAAEvvZX2ILFkWp7KB-jjdL4v0JV2e" height="300" width="500" frameborder="0"></iframe><br>
<textarea name="recaptcha_challenge_field" rows="3" cols="40"></textarea>
<input type="hidden" name="recaptcha_response_field" value="manual_challenge">
</noscript>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
Recaptcha.create("6Ldg1s4SAAAAAEvvZX2ILFkWp7KB-jjdL4v0JV2e", "recaptcha_content", {
theme: "red",
callback: Recaptcha.focus_response_field
});
});
</script>
<p>
<input type="submit" name="continue" id="captcha-continue" value=" Continue ">
<span id="captchaFormSpinner" class="commentSpinner hiddenBox"><img src="/.shared/images/spinner.gif" alt="Working..."></span>
</p>
</form>
Name: comments_form — POST https://www.typepad.com/t/comments
<form class="form-horizontal" onsubmit="handleSubmit(this)" method="post" action="https://www.typepad.com/t/comments" name="comments_form">
<input type="hidden" name="static" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="entry_id" value="6a00d8341bfae553ef022ad39e8943200d">
<div class="control-group">
<label class="control-label">Name</label>
<div class="controls">
<input onchange="handleChange(this)" tabindex="1" id="author" name="author">
</div>
</div>
<div class="control-group">
<label class="control-label">Email</label>
<div class="controls">
<input onchange="handleChange(this)" tabindex="2" id="email" name="email">
</div>
</div>
<div class="control-group">
<label class="control-label">URL</label>
<div class="controls">
<input onchange="handleChange(this)" tabindex="3" id="url" name="url">
</div>
</div>
<div class="control-group">
<div class="controls">
<label class="checkbox">
<input tabindex="5" onclick="handleCheck(this)" type="checkbox" id="bakecookie" name="bakecookie" value="1"> Remember personal info? </label>
</div>
</div>
<div class="control-group">
<label class="control-label">Comments</label>
<div class="controls">
<textarea tabindex="4" id="comment-text" name="text" class="span6"></textarea>
</div>
</div>
<div class="form-actions">
<button type="submit" name="preview" class="btn btn-primary" onclick="">Preview</button>
<button type="submit" name="post" class="btn" onclick="">Post</button>
</div>
</form>
Text Content
* * * About * Resources * Shop Amazon * RSS * Network Information * Join the Network * Advertise on the Network * Law Professor Blogs Network Go to the Network Join the Network Advertise on the Network * About * Resources * Shop Amazon * Go! * APPELLATE ADVOCACY BLOG Editor: Tessa L. Dysart The University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law A MEMBER OF THE LAW PROFESSOR BLOGS NETWORK Saturday, November 10, 2018 GRAMMAR BOTS CAN HELP FIX YOUR LEGAL WRITING By Joseph Regalia 27.9k Shares 29 29 19 16 "To be a good legal writer, honestly, is to know the law, and to be a good writer." -- Justice Elena Kagan Improving your writing muscle is like improving any muscle: it takes a long time and a lot of effort. Because even after you learn a new writing tool--say, by reading an article or listening to a lecture--it takes extra work for that tool to become part of your everyday writing habit. And if it's not habit, good luck remembering it at 3 a.m. as you pound out a brief. For law students and young lawyers, a big struggle is simply not having enough writing tools committed to habit yet. And playing catch-up is tough. They are still trying to figure out how the law works, much less the nuances of writing craft. For those of us who begin our legal careers with some big grammar and style gaps--that just compounds the problem. As a legal writing teacher, this is an eternal struggle. I sympathize with my students who feel attacked on all sides: not only must they learn how to wrangle all these legal concepts, but now they're expected to be a top-notch writer, too. And I'm not sure which is more difficult. For foreign lawyers, simply writing grammatically can feel overwhelming. But fear not, because like so many other things, technology can help. There are now incredible programs that can do wonders for helping you catch problems in your writing--and learn new writing tools while you're at it. What these programs do best is flag style bumps, which not only helps proof your document, but helps you get better at spotting the problems yourself. I find myself using these programs more and more to help students plug their grammar gaps and ease the burden of having to be both advocate and editor. In this post and next week's, I'm going to walk you through some of the most exciting automated grammar and style tools out there. In each post we'll look at a few tools that will help with your editing; then a few that will help you learn some new writing moves for yourself. 1. To help you spot more edits: ProWritingAid, Word Rake, White Smoke, and Grammarly Every month there seems to be a new editing tool on the market. I try to demo each one as I find them--and there are some big differences in their capabilities. ProWritingAid: The powerhouse of style For me, this might be the most exciting program because of how many editing tools it has under the hood. PWA gives you more editing suggestions than Grammarly. And it offers new, exciting ways to see your writing mechanics. I love having my law students use this tool when they're learning about sentence length and structure. On style, PWA catches things that many other checkers don't--like repetitiveness. We all sometimes repeat a unique word too soon in our writing, which sounds off to the ear. PWA understands that and will flag them. You can see that PWA even color-codes the repeats. PWA also helps shore up all sorts of other style tools: like missing transitions, pronoun problems, cliches, vague wording, sentence-length variation, over-dependence on adverbs, passive voice, and over-complicated sentence constructions (In other words, a good chunk of the things we all painstakingly edit for). It has one of the coolest style-analysis tools that I've ever seen. PWA gives you a visual snapshot of your sentence lengths throughout your document, helping you home in on the important places to start editing. For law students and young lawyers, I find that looking at visual and data-driven analysis of their writing gives them a whole new perspective. PWA also breaks down all sorts of writing dimensions: like your most commonly used words, your transition-word index--and so much more. Here is an analysis of a law review article: PWA has a powerful grammar and spelling checker that catches contextual misspellings and usage problems (which, to be fair, many of the other tools on this list do, too). PWA offers an awesome word finder that that will help you find that perfect concrete verb or descriptor you need to persuade. This tool is advanced: predicting which words or phrases will be most helpful for you given the context added by surrounding words. PWA can even help you find the perfect sounding words (if you're going for a rhetorical flourish). Finally, PWA is pretty good in the learning department, too. It's not designed as a pure education tool, but it offers great explanations of the edits that it suggests. Oh, and PWA integrates with Word and other platforms. So no worries there. Word Rake: The concise-inator. I warn you: for legal writing nerds, this one may blow your mind (and feel a little like magic). Word Rake was built for one thing: conciseness. Click a button and the tool ripples through your writing, clearing away clutter and glue words to leave only those content-packed gems. The founders have 9 patents on their clutter-clearing inventions. And the power of the technology shows. A Grammarly alternative: White Smoke White Smoke is less polished than Grammarly, but it boasts some features that the grammar-giant doesn't. White Smoke will catch tons of grammar problems that you would otherwise need to do by hand--like double negatives, subject-verb disagreement, tense shifts, and those pesky dangling modifers. The ever-popular (and rightly so) Grammarly. There is a reason that Grammarly is the most popular editing tool on the market: it's good. Grammarly operates smoothly and catches many of the important edits. It's easy to use and fast. And the company is always adding new tools. Grammarly is also pretty good in the teaching department, explaining most of the edits that it suggests. Grammarly has an updated reports feature, which gives you analysis of your writing style. This is helpful for setting writing goals and tracking your improvement. 2. To teach you some new writing moves: Noredink, Hemingway App, and Writing Like a Lawyer One of the most common questions I get is: how do I work on my basic grammar? A lot of us have grammar gaps coming into the law, and there is nothing that kills credibility faster than glaring grammar mistakes in your legal writing. Luckily there are some great programs for the basics. I'll cover the non-legal ones this week and explore the legal ones (Core Grammar, Writing Like a Lawyer, and others) next week. Noredink: Grammar basics Noredink is excellent for brushing up on every aspect of grammar and usage. Not only is it a comprehensive resource for grammar lessons--the developers created some neat, intuitive ways to practice. Noredink is great for teachers, because you can setup your own custimizable course--focusing students on whichever grammar or usage issues you see them running into. I use it with my foreign law students all the time. Hemingway app: a high-level writing highlighter Hemingway app is a classic (and free). This tool will train you to spot long sentences, complex phrases, over-used adverbs, and passive voice. It's the easiest tool to use: just paste in your writing and it goes to work. Color-coded highlights will instantly show you what to work on. See you next week! Joe Regalia is a law professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law and regularly leads workshops training legal writing and technology. The views he expresses here are solely his own and not intended to be legal advice. Check out his other articles and writing tips here. https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/appellate_advocacy/2018/11/grammar-bots-can-help-you-step-up-your-legal-writing.html | Permalink COMMENTS mr. Regalia, could you assess the tools you reviewed from a blind lawyers or blind law students perspective please. As a completely blind lawyer, I'd appreciate knowing how these tools interact with screen reading software. Thanks. Posted by: Matt | Nov 15, 2018 9:33:29 AM Hi Matt--let me look into this. You raise a great, and important, question. I'm not sure how friendly these are to screen readers. I will look into this! Posted by: Joe Regalia | Nov 15, 2018 10:00:47 AM POST A COMMENT VERIFY YOUR COMMENT PREVIEWING YOUR COMMENT Posted by: | This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted. Your comment could not be posted. Error type: Your comment has been posted. Post another comment The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again. As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments. Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate. Name Email URL Remember personal info? Comments Preview Post This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support LPBN Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you. Join Amazon Prime - Watch Over 40,000 Movies RECENT COMMENTS * Adam Lamparello on Will Former President Donald Trump’s Conviction Be Overturned? * John VanHorn on Will Former President Donald Trump’s Conviction Be Overturned? * vex game on A Font by Any Other Name Does Not Read the Same * Keith Schmitt on Will Former President Donald Trump’s Conviction Be Overturned? * David Deehl on New Rules on Appealing Factual Findings under the Clear-Evidence Rule * * RECENT POSTS * Questions to Consider When Preparing for Oral Argument * Neurodiversity and Legal Advocacy: Dyslexia * A Font by Any Other Name Does Not Read the Same, Redux * On Using ChatGPT for Statutory Interpretation * Four years of the Journal of Appellate Practice and Process at Arizona CATEGORIES Please Select \ Appellate Advocacy \ Appellate Court Reform \ Appellate Justice \ Appellate Practice \ Appellate Procedure \ Arbitration \ Books \ Current Affairs \ Federal Appeals Courts \ Film \ Food and Drink \ Humor \ International Appeals \ Law School \ Legal Ethics \ Legal Profession \ Legal Writing \ Moot Court \ Music \ Oral Argument \ Religion \ Rhetoric \ Science \ Sports \ State Appeals Courts \ Television \ Travel \ Tribal Law and Appeals \ United States Supreme Court \ Web/Tech \ Weblogs The Archives MONTHLY ARCHIVE Please Select June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 StatCounter 2,704,665 PageViews Since November 10, 2013 EDITORS TESSA L. DYSART Assistant Director of Legal Writing Associate Clinical Professor of Law The University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law * Email * SSRN CONTRIBUTING EDITORS LANCE CAUGHFIELD Partner, Baker Moran Doggett Ma & Dobbs * Email KIRSTEN K. DAVIS Professor of Law Director Institute for the Advancement of Legal Communication Stetson University College of Law * Email ADAM LAMPARELLO Associate Professor Associate Dean of Experiential Learning Indiana Tech Law School * Email ROBERT C. MONTGOMERY Director of Upper Level Writing Campbell University School of Law * Email JOHN NIELSEN Assistant Solicitor General Utah Attorney General's Office Associate Professor Quinney Law School All opinions in my posts are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my office. * Email ROBERT S. PECK President, Center for Constitutional Litigation * Email DANIEL L. REAL Assistant Professor of Law Creighton University School of Law * Profile * Email * SSRN Author Page * Twitter JOSEPH REGALIA Adjunct Professor UNLV * Email PHILIP J. SEAVER-HALL Litigation Associate Knox McLaughlin Gornall & Sennett, P.C. * Profile * Email LEAH A. TEDFORD Litigation Associate Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP * Email STEPHANIE RAE WILLIAMS Assistant Professor of Legal Research and Writing Pepperdine University School of Law * Email FOUNDING EDITOR DAVID R. CLEVELAND Professor of Law Valparaiso University Law School * Profile * Email * Twitter * SSRN Author Page © Copyright 2004-2024 by Law Professor Blogs, LLC. All rights reserved. Copyright Policy. © Copyright 2004-2024 by Law Professor Blogs, LLC. All rights reserved. Copyright Policy. Scroll to top WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY Manage Settings Vendors VENDOR SETTINGS PURPOSES VENDORS CAN: Store and/or access information on a device Use limited data to select advertising Create profiles for personalised advertising Use profiles to select personalised advertising Create profiles to personalise content Use profiles to select personalised content Measure advertising performance Measure content performance Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources Develop and improve services Use limited data to select content SPECIAL PURPOSES VENDORS CAN: * Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors * Deliver and present advertising and content FEATURES VENDORS CAN: * Match and combine data from other data sources * Link different devices * Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically SPECIAL FEATURES VENDORS CAN: Use precise geolocation data Actively scan device characteristics for identification Some partners do not ask for your consent to process your data, instead, they rely on their legitimate business interest. Personal data processed includes but is not limited to cookies, IP addresses, and URLs visited. View our list of partners to see the purposes they believe they have a legitimate interest for and object to legitimate interests on a per vendor basis. Manage your settings and object to purposes as a legitimate interest in general. You can change your settings at any time, including by withdrawing your consent, by clicking on the cog icon in the bottom right hand corner. Manage Settings Vendors (842) Accept All Reject All Save & Exit