cwbank.login-dirrect.online Open in urlscan Pro
195.123.211.199  Public Scan

URL: https://cwbank.login-dirrect.online/
Submission: On January 15 via automatic, source certstream-suspicious — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Right to Repair passes in New York!

Sign In
Advocacy
How to Help
Legislation
Policy Objectives
Environment
Our Work
Brochure
Industries
Common Ground
Agriculture
Appliances
Automotive
Consumer Electronics
Information Technology
Medical Equipment
Resellers
Worst in Show 2022
Where To Repair
About
About Us
News
Members
Blog
Events
History
Newsletter
Store
Donate
Join
0 items
$0
Sign In
Advocacy
How to Help
Legislation
Policy Objectives
Environment
Our Work
Brochure
Industries
Common Ground
Agriculture
Appliances
Automotive
Consumer Electronics
Information Technology
Medical Equipment
Resellers
Worst in Show 2022
Where To Repair
About
About Us
News
Members
Blog
Events
History
Newsletter
Store
Donate
Join
Gay Byrne
June 3, 2021


A CANADIAN RIGHT TO REPAIR BILL SEES 330-0 VOTE, AS MEASURE CLEARS KEY HURDLE

Gay Byrne
June 3, 2021

Everywhere you go, people just want to fix their stuff. 

On June 2, Canada’s Parliament voted unanimously upon second reading (330 – 0)
in favour of Bill C-272. The Private Member’s Bill, put forward by Liberal MP
Bryan May (Cambridge), targets technological protection measures (“TPMs”) under
Canada’s Copyright Act. 

TPMs or digital locks can be physical connectors, encryption, or firmware
restrictions on the use of replacement or aftermarket parts. These locks can
even restrict access to basic information needed for diagnosis of faulty
equipment or devices and can present a meaningful barrier to repair. 

TPMs have been a central Right to Repair issue for many years now in Canada and
elsewhere. In the U.S., Repair.org members iFixit and EFF (along with many other
advocates) have pressed for and won exemptions to U.S. Copyright law to allow
bypassing digital locks in certain devices for repair purposes. But Canada’s
copyright framework does not allow case-by-case exemptions in this way. MP Bryan
May’s bill seeks to finally tip the copyright scales in favour of repair by
carving out a blanket repair exception right in the Copyright Act itself.

TPMs can be a significant inhibitor to independent repair because circumventing
them can result in large damage awards if brought before a court. The Canadian
Federal Court’s 2017 decision in Nintendo v King revealed that unlawful
circumvention of TPMs under Canadian law would be treated seriously and
manufacturers will receive the protection of heavy-handed, multi-million dollar
damages awards. 

Bill C-272 was introduced for first reading in February of this year and has
since moved along through the usual parliamentary process. Throughout the
debates and discussions among parliamentarians since, it has received
overwhelming support across party lines and bridged the rural-urban divide.
Despite his government’s current minority status and the usual eagerness of
parliamentarians to politicise reform efforts in these circumstances, May’s bill
has been noticeably uncontroversial and above normal partisanship. 

For repair advocates in Canada, it will be a race to get the bill to the finish
line before new elections are called. The C-272 will now be referred to the
Industry Committee for further consideration and amendment. 

Speaking before Parliament on 2 June 2021, MP Bryan May explained why a
clarification of the scope and purpose of TPMs is needed in this case: “I hope
that this legislation kicks off a deeper conversation about the Right to
Repair…the Copyright Act is being used and interpreted in areas far beyond its
scope.”

Indeed, that deeper conversation might be the real test of this bill’s mettle.
With a history of lobbying efforts quashing pro-repair reforms in Canada
already, there is enough precedent to reason that large manufacturers will not
pass up the opportunity to shape this conversation more in their direction. 

Right to Repair is a growing movement in Canada -- as Bill C-272 shows. Though
more reforms would be needed truly give Canadians a Right to Repair, this bill
may be the catalyst that sets this bigger series of reforms into motion. For a
start, 330-0 certainly sends a strong message. 

By Anthony Rosborough. Anthony is an intellectual property lawyer, researcher at
the European University Institute and a member of Repair.org. Much of his work
focuses on the right to repair in Canada and beyond. 




Share


Newer PostNew York State Senate gears up for landmark Right to Repair vote
Older PostFTC Affirms Right to Repair is Right for Consumers


Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Sales Agreement

Back to Top
Home
Privacy Policy
Sales Agreement
Terms of Service
Join The Repair Association
The Repair Association, New York, United States518-251-2837ggbyrne@repair.org



WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

The Repair Association
Vendors
Manage Settings
Vendors


THE REPAIR ASSOCIATION SETTINGS


PURPOSES

WE AND OUR PARTNERS CAN:

Measure content performance

Develop and improve products



VENDOR SETTINGS


PURPOSES

VENDORS CAN:

Store and/or access information on a device

Select basic ads

Create a personalised ads profile

Select personalised ads

Create a personalised content profile

Select personalised content

Measure ad performance

Measure content performance

Apply market research to generate audience insights

Develop and improve products



SPECIAL PURPOSES

VENDORS CAN:

 * Ensure security, prevent fraud, and debug
 * Technically deliver ads or content


FEATURES

VENDORS CAN:

 * Match and combine offline data sources
 * Link different devices
 * Receive and use automatically-sent device characteristics for identification


SPECIAL FEATURES

VENDORS CAN:

Use precise geolocation data

Actively scan device characteristics for identification


Some partners do not ask for your consent to process your data, instead, they
rely on their legitimate business interest. Personal data processed includes but
is not limited to cookies, IP addresses, and URLs visited. View our list of
partners to see the purposes they believe they have a legitimate interest for
and object to legitimate interests on a per vendor basis. Manage your settings
and object to purposes as a legitimate interest in general.

You can change your settings at any time, including by withdrawing your consent,
by clicking on the cog icon in the bottom right hand corner.

Manage Settings
Vendors
Accept All
Reject All
Save & Exit