www.theguardian.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
2a04:4e42:600::367
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/16/oil-firms-climate-claims-are-greenwashing-study-concludes
Submission: On February 18 via manual from US — Scanned from DE
Submission: On February 18 via manual from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOMText Content
Skip to main contentSkip to navigation Advertisement International edition * International edition * UK edition * US edition * Australian edition The Guardian - Back to home SUPPORT THE GUARDIAN Available for everyone, funded by readers Contribute ContributeSubscribe Search jobs Sign inSearch * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle ShowMoreShow More * News * World news * UK news * Coronavirus * Climate crisis * Environment * Science * Global development * Football * Tech * Business * Obituaries * Opinion * The Guardian view * Columnists * Cartoons * Opinion videos * Letters * Sport * Football * Winter Olympics * Cricket * Rugby union * Tennis * Cycling * F1 * Golf * US sports * Culture * Books * Music * TV & radio * Art & design * Film * Games * Classical * Stage * Lifestyle * Fashion * Food * Recipes * Love & sex * Health & fitness * Home & garden * Women * Men * Family * Travel * Money * Make a contribution * Subscribe * * Search jobs * Holidays * Digital Archive * Guardian Puzzles app * Guardian content licensing site * The Guardian app * Video * Podcasts * Pictures * Newsletters * Today's paper * Inside the Guardian * The Observer * Guardian Weekly * Crosswords * * Search jobs * Holidays * Digital Archive * Guardian Puzzles app * Guardian content licensing site * World * UK * Coronavirus * Climate crisis * Environment * Science * Global development * Football * Tech * Business * Obituaries Oil OIL FIRMS’ CLIMATE CLAIMS ARE GREENWASHING, STUDY CONCLUDES Most comprehensive scientific analysis to date finds words are not matched by actions Financial analysis found major oil companies’ business models were still dependent on fossil fuels. Photograph: Rich Pedroncelli/AP Financial analysis found major oil companies’ business models were still dependent on fossil fuels. Photograph: Rich Pedroncelli/AP Damian Carrington Environment editor @dpcarrington Wed 16 Feb 2022 19.00 GMT Last modified on Thu 17 Feb 2022 05.08 GMT * * * Accusations of greenwashing against major oil companies that claim to be in transition to clean energy are well-founded, according to the most comprehensive study to date. The research, published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, examined the records of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell and BP, which together are responsible for more than 10% of global carbon emissions since 1965. The researchers analysed data over the 12 years up to 2020 and concluded the company claims do not align with their actions, which include increasing rather than decreasing exploration. The study found a sharp rise in mentions of “climate”, “low-carbon” and “transition” in annual reports in recent years, especially for Shell and BP, and increasing pledges of action in strategies. But concrete actions were rare and the researchers said: “Financial analysis reveals a continuing business model dependence on fossil fuels along with insignificant and opaque spending on clean energy.” Numerous previous studies have shown there are already more reserves of oil and gas and more planned production than could be burned while keeping below the internationally agreed temperature target of 1.5C. In May 2021, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said there can be no new fossil fuel developments if the world is to reach net zero by 2050. New North Sea oil and gas licences ‘incompatible with UK climate goals’ Read more Oil companies are under increasing pressure from investors to align their businesses with climate targets. But their plans have faced scepticism, prompting the researchers to conduct the new research, which they said was objective and comprehensive. “Until there is very concrete progress, we have every reason to be very sceptical about claims to be moving in a green direction,” said Prof Gregory Trencher, at Kyoto University in Japan, who worked with Mei Li and Jusen Asuka at Tohoku University. “If they were moving away from fossil fuels we would expect to see, for example, declines in exploration activity, fossil fuel production, and sales and profit from fossil fuels,” he said. “But if anything, we find evidence of the reverse happening.” “Recent pledges look very nice and they’re getting a lot of people excited, but we have to put these in the context of company history of actions,” Trencher said. “It’s like a very naughty schoolboy telling the teacher ‘I promise to do all my homework next week’, but the student has never worked hard.” The new study, published in the journal PLOS One, found mentions of climate-related keywords in annual reports rose sharply from 2009 to 2020. For example, BP’s use of “climate change” went from 22 to 326 mentions. But in terms of strategy and actions, the researchers found “the companies are pledging a transition to clean energy and setting targets more than they are making concrete actions”. Chevron and ExxonMobil were “laggards” compared to Shell and BP, the researchers said, but even the European majors’ actions appeared to contradict their pledges. For example, BP and Shell pledged to reduce investments in fossil fuel extraction projects, but both increased their acreage for new exploration in recent years, the researchers said. Furthermore, the analysis found Shell, BP, and Chevron increased fossil fuel production volumes over the study period. None of the companies directly releases data on their investments in clean energy, but information they provided to the Carbon Disclosure Project indicates low average levels ranging from 0.2% by ExxonMobil to 2.3% by BP of annual capital expenditure (capex). Separate analysis by the IEA indicates that investment in clean energy by oil and gas companies was about 1% of capex in 2020. “Until actions and investment behaviour are brought into alignment with discourse, accusations of greenwashing appear well-founded,” the researchers said. A spokesperson for ExxonMobil said: “The move to a lower emission future requires multiple solutions that can be implemented at scale. We plan to play a leading role in the energy transition, while retaining investment flexibility across a portfolio of evolving opportunities, including for example carbon capture, hydrogen and biofuels, to maximise shareholder returns.” A Chevron spokesperson said: “We are focused on lowering the carbon intensity in our operations and seeking to grow lower carbon businesses along with our traditional business lines. We are planning $10bn in lower carbon investments by 2028.” Shell’s spokesperson said: “Shell’s target is to become a net zero emissions energy business by 2050, in step with society. Our short, medium and long term intensity and absolute targets are consistent with the more ambitious 1.5C goal of the Paris Agreement. We were also the first energy company to submit its energy transition strategy to shareholders for a vote, securing strong endorsement.” A spokesperson for BP said: “In 2020 BP set out our new net zero ambition, aims and strategy, and in 2021 completed the largest transformation of the company in our history to deliver these. Because this paper looks back historically over the period 2009-2020, we don’t believe it will take these developments and our progress fully into account.” Trencher rejected the charge that the analysis was out of date: “We included the documents that were published during 2021, so the so-called data gap is only about six months and we don’t find any evidence of any new actions that would change any of our findings.” “Unfortunately, the way the energy markets are structured around the world, fossil fuels still enjoy many [regulatory and tax] advantages and renewables are still disadvantaged,” he said. As 2022 begins, and you're joining us from Germany, there’s a new year resolution we’d like you to consider. Tens of millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s fearless journalism since we started publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty, solidarity and hope. We’d like to invite you to join more than 1.5 million supporters, from 180 countries, who now power us financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent. Unlike many others, the Guardian has no shareholders and no billionaire owner. Just the determination and passion to deliver high-impact global reporting, always free from commercial or political influence. Reporting like this is vital for democracy, for fairness and to demand better from the powerful. And we provide all this for free, for everyone to read. We do this because we believe in information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of the global events shaping our world, understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action. Millions can benefit from open access to quality, truthful news, regardless of their ability to pay for it. If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Guardian from as little as €1 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you. Contribution frequency Single Monthly Annual Contribution amount €6 per month €10 per month Other Continue Remind me in March Topics * Oil * Fossil fuels * Oil and gas companies * Gas * Climate crisis * Energy * Energy industry * news * * * * * * Reuse this content MOST POPULAR MOST POPULAR * World * UK * Coronavirus * Climate crisis * Environment * Science * Global development * Football * Tech * Business * Obituaries * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle * Contact us * Complaints & corrections * SecureDrop * Work for us * Privacy settings * Privacy policy * Cookie policy * Terms & conditions * Help * All topics * All writers * Digital newspaper archive * Facebook * YouTube * Instagram * LinkedIn * Twitter * Newsletters * Advertise with us * Search UK jobs Back to top © 2022 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. (modern)