foreignpolicy.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:20::ac43:449f Public Scan

Back to summary

Submitted URL:
https://click.convertkit-mail.com/xmumx9r6kkf6hr0ezvmtgu03rnkll/n2hohvh3rzv3dkb6/aHR0cHM6Ly9mb3JlaWducG9saWN5LmNvbS8yMDE5LzExLzI4L...
Effective URL:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/28/mikhail-gorbachev-pizza-hut-ad-thanksgiving-miracle/
Submission: On March 20 via api (March 20th 2024, 7:08:10 pm UTC) from CA — Scanned from CA

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

GET /

<form role="search" method="get" id="searchform-site-nav-menu" class="searchform searchform-site-nav" action="/">
  <label class="hide searchfield-site-nav-label" for="searchform-site-nav-menu-search-input">Search</label>
  <input class="search searchfield-site-nav" type="search" name="s" id="searchform-site-nav-menu-search-input" aria-label="Search" autocomplete="on" placeholder="Search FP">
  <button type="submit" class="site-nav-search-submit-btn">
    <span class="icon nav-search-icon">
      <svg viewBox="0 0 18 18" aria-labelledby="svg-title-search-menu" role="button">
        <title id="svg-title-search-menu">Search Icon</title>
        <circle class="search-icon" cx="7.5" cy="7.3" r="6.5"></circle>
        <line class="search-icon" x1="12.1" y1="11.9" x2="17.5" y2="17.3"></line>
      </svg></span> </button>
</form>

GET /

<form role="search" method="get" id="searchform-site-nav-drawer" class="searchform searchform-site-nav" action="/">
  <label class="hide searchfield-site-nav-label" for="searchform-site-nav-drawer-search-input">Search</label>
  <input class="search searchfield-site-nav" type="search" name="s" id="searchform-site-nav-drawer-search-input" aria-label="Search" autocomplete="on" placeholder="Search FP">
  <button type="submit" class="site-nav-search-submit-btn">
    <span class="icon nav-search-icon">
      <svg viewBox="0 0 18 18" aria-labelledby="svg-title-search-drawer" role="button">
        <title id="svg-title-search-drawer">Search Icon</title>
        <circle class="search-icon" cx="7.5" cy="7.3" r="6.5"></circle>
        <line class="search-icon" x1="12.1" y1="11.9" x2="17.5" y2="17.3"></line>
      </svg></span> </button>
</form>

Text Content

By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies. This use includes
personalization of content and ads, and traffic analytics. Review our Privacy
Policy for more information.

Skip to navigation Skip to search Skip to main content Skip to footer
Show expanded website navigation
Foreign Policy Magazine Foreign Policy Magazine
Primary Navigation
* Latest
* Regions
* Newsletters
* FP Live

* Latest
* Trending:

* U.S. 2024 election
* Russia's war in Ukraine

Website Search and Account Management
Search Icon

Sign In
Give a Gift Give a Gift
Group Subscriptions Group Subscriptions
Subscribe Subscribe Upgrade Upgrade
Show expanded website navigation

Feature: Mikhail Gorbachev’s Pizza Hut Thanksgiving Miracle

Share
* Copy Link Link copied to clipboard
* Email
* Facebook
* Twitter
* LinkedIn
* WhatsApp
* Reddit

Save

1. Create an FP account to save articles to read later and in the FP mobile
app.

ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

* Preferences
* My FP Feed
* Saved Articles
* Newsletters
* Magazine Archive
* Subscription Settings
* FAQs
* Log Out

Close expanded menu
Foreign Policy Magazine Foreign Policy Magazine
Sign In

* Preferences
* My FP Feed
* Saved Articles
* Newsletters
* Magazine Archive
* Subscription Settings
* FAQs
* Log Out

Close expanded menu
* Latest
* Newsletters
* World Brief
* Editors’ Picks
* Africa Brief
* China Brief
* Latin America Brief
* South Asia Brief
* Situation Report
* Flash Points
* See All

TOPICS

* War in Ukraine
* Israel and Hamas
* U.S.-China competition
* Biden's foreign policy
* Trade and economics
* Artificial intelligence

REGIONS

* Asia & the Pacific
* China
* Middle East & Africa
* Americas
* Europe

FP LIVE

*
* See All

PODCASTS

* Illustration with Adam Tooze headshot on a green background with the text
"Ones & Tooze"

ONES AND TOOZE

* Illustration with a male spy headshot and the text I Spy

I SPY

* FP Live podcast logo

FOREIGN POLICY LIVE

* See All

MAGAZINE

Winter 2024 Issue

WINTER 2024 ISSUE

Print Archive

See All

FP ANALYTICS

* In-depth Special Reports
* Issue Briefs
* Power Maps and Interactive Microsites
* FP Simulations & PeaceGames
* Graphics Database
* See All

EVENTS

* PROMISE OVER PERIL: PART SIX

March 28

HER POWER 2024

April 18

FP GLOBAL HEALTH FORUM 2024

May 30
* See All

Search Search Icon
Additional Navigation
Follow FP on X Follow FP on LinkedIn Follow FP on Instagram Follow FP on
Facebook

FP SOLUTIONS

* FP Analytics
* FP Events
* FP Studios
* Simulations and Peacegames
* Advertise with FP
* Country Reports

SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

* Your FP Account
* Group Subscriptions
* Reprint Permissions
* FP Magazine Archive
* Buy Back Issues

EDUCATION

* Graduate Education Guide
* FP for Education
* Institutional Access

ABOUT FP

* Writer's Guidelines
* Meet the Staff
* Work at FP
* Contact FP
* Privacy Policy
* Terms of Use

Follow FP on X Follow FP on LinkedIn Follow FP on Instagram Follow FP on
Facebook

Foreign Policy Magazine is a division of Graham Holdings Company. All contents
(c) 2024, Graham Digital Holding Company. All rights reserved. Foreign Policy,
655 15th St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20005.

Powered by WordPress VIP
Close expanded website navigation
* Asia & the Pacific
* China
* Middle East & Africa
* Americas
* Europe

Close expanded menu
Enter your email Sign Up

By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and
to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.

World Brief

Your guide to the most important world stories of the day

Africa Brief

Essential analysis of the stories shaping geopolitics on the continent

China Brief

The latest news, analysis, and data from the country each week

Situation Report

Weekly update on what’s driving U.S. national security policy

Editors’ Picks

Evening roundup with our editors’ favorite stories of the day

Latin America Brief

One-stop digest of politics, economics, and culture

South Asia Brief

Weekly update on developments in India and its neighbors

Flash Points

A curated selection of our very best long reads

View All Newsletters
Close expanded menu
Search Search Icon
Mikhail-Gorbachev-Pizza-Hut-commercial-James-Fosdike-homepage
James Fosdike illustrations for Foreign Policy
Feature

MIKHAIL GORBACHEV’S PIZZA HUT THANKSGIVING MIRACLE

IN 1997, THE FORMER SOVIET LEADER NEEDED MONEY, AND PIZZA HUT NEEDED A
SPOKESMAN. GREATNESS ENSUED.

November 28, 2019, 7:00 AM

My FP: Follow topics and authors to get straight to what you like. Exclusively
for FP subscribers. Subscribe Now | Log In

* Russia

By Paul Musgrave, an assistant professor of political science at the University
of Massachusetts Amherst.

Listen to this article

It’s dangerous for leaders to outlive their countries. Whether they move on or
become obsessed with returning to power, they cannot escape their role as
symbols of a vanished world—a condition fraught with both nostalgia and danger.

Nobody knows that burden like Mikhail Gorbachev, the final leader of the Soviet
Union. Since his involuntary retirement, Gorbachev has raised money for worthy
causes, attempted to make a comeback in Russian politics, and, notoriously, made
an advertisement for Pizza Hut.

The ad would have become a footnote were it not for its long second life online,
where it’s rediscovered every few years. There’s an undeniable voyeuristic
frisson of seeing a man who once commanded a superpower hawking pizza.

Each time it repeats, it leaves behind a new flood of clickbait—Time listing it
among the “Top 10 Embarrassing Celebrity Commercials” in 2010, Mental Floss
using Gorbachev’s birthday as a hook to link to it in 2012, Thrillist naming it
the sixth-most bizarre celebrity endorsement of all time. Most of the facts
dredged up in these deluges are recycled from a 1997 New York Times article.

More serious authors treat the commercial as a free-floating signifier to prove
whatever thesis they are peddling, as when Jacobin cites it as another data
point showing that Gorbachev was a sellout or David Foster Wallace uses it to
prove the vacuity of popular culture.

But the conventional stories don’t really hold up. Gorbachev isn’t actually the
star of the commercial. He doesn’t even speak. He’s a bystander to the
commercial’s central drama, a fight over Gorbachev’s legacy between a fiery,
pro-reform young man and a dour, anti-Gorbachev middle-aged man—possibly father
and son. The two exchange charges and defenses of Gorbachev’s record—“Because of
him, we have economic confusion!” “Because of him, we have opportunity!”
“Complete chaos!” “Hope!”—before an older woman settles the argument: “Because
of him, we have many things … like Pizza Hut!”

In a lot of ways, it’s a beautiful short film and a very weird advertisement:
Who would have thought that a bunch of Muscovites bickering about the end of
communism would be a natural pitch for pizza?

For the people who created the ad—the executives, the agents, the creatives—it
was a professional landmark. But for Gorbachev himself, the story of the ad is a
tragedy: one man’s attempt to find—and to fund—a place in a country that wanted
nothing more to do with him.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the world, the death of the Soviet Union was a geopolitical earthquake. For
Gorbachev, it was a forced retirement at the hands of his rival—and successor as
Russian leader—Boris Yeltsin. According to the biographer William Taubman in
Gorbachev: His Life and Times, Gorbachev reciprocated Yeltsin’s hatred, telling
one journalist: “When they hang me, make sure that they don’t hang Yeltsin from
the same birch tree.”

Initially, Yeltsin and Gorbachev avoided direct conflict. But within months of
the Russian Federation’s establishment, Gorbachev began criticizing Yeltsin
publicly. In retaliation, the Russian president ordered an audit into whether
Gorbachev’s foundation was illegally using Communist Party funds. Then the
Kremlin systematically removed the foundation’s sources of support, ginned up
protests to harass the foundation, and finally cut its office space to a few
thousand square feet.

Yeltsin’s final victory would come in the 1996 election. That year, Gorbachev
challenged Yeltsin by launching his own bid for the presidency—scraping just 0.5
percent of the first-round vote. After that victory, Yeltsin left the foundation
alone. Yet the years of presidential harassment had taken its toll on
Gorbachev’s finances. In 1991, the heads of the former Soviet republics had
voted to give Gorbachev a pension of 4,000 rubles per month—but it was not
indexed to inflation. By 1994, according to Meduza, his pension was worth less
than $2 a month.

Gorbachev had suffered the same fate as many Soviet retirees, who had looked
forward to generous pensions only to find themselves forced to hustle and scrape
to get by as the Russian economy collapsed around them—shrinking by 30 percent
between 1991 and 1998. The foundation, too, was tottering, with even Gorbachev’s
significant lecture fees unable to sustain both his family and the foundation
and its staff, let alone any projects he might want to pursue to leave a legacy.
Even generous donations from Ted Turner only went so far.

Gorbachev was determined to stay in Russia and fight for reform, not to take up
a life of well-compensated exile abroad. To do that, he would need money to fund
his center, his staff, and his activities—urgently. As Gorbachev later told
France 24 when asked about the ad, “I needed to finish the building. The workers
started to leave—I needed to pay them.”

To keep his vision going—and to stay relevant in a world moving beyond him—he
would need a lot of money. More, even, than he could make by giving lectures.
More than anyone in Russia could, or wanted to, give him.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev and his wife, Raisa, talk to
journalists during their visit to St. Petersburg in April 1994. (Future
President Vladimir Putin is seen just behind them.)

Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and his wife, Raisa Gorbachev, talk to
journalists during their visit to St. Petersburg in April 1994. (Future Russian
President Vladimir Putin is seen just behind them.) Sovfoto/Universal Images
Group via Getty Images

As the Soviet Union shrank, Pizza Hut expanded.

The American firm had broken into the Soviet Union just before it died, thanks
in part to Gorbachev’s policies of openness. That’s one reason why the
commercial could exist in the first place: It was filmed on location in a Moscow
Pizza Hut near Red Square, which had opened in 1990 as part of a Soviet-era deal
with the chain’s then-parent company, PepsiCo. That arrangement, which had been
hailed as the “deal of the century,” flopped when the Soviet Union collapsed,
killing both the Russian economy and the restaurant’s supply chain. (Overnight,
Lithuanian mozzarella became an expensive import from a foreign country.)

That connection helped provide the hook that Pizza Hut’s advertising creatives
needed. For the advertising firm BBDO, Pizza Hut was a big client in a
challenging category. Conveniently for BBDO, that translated into big-budget
commercials. Pizza Hut ordered dozens of ads a year from BBDO, with a mixture of
ordinary TV spots touting weekly specials and major campaigns featuring
spokespeople like Dennis Rodman and Donald Trump.

Keeping such a big client happy was a priority for the firm. By 1997, Pizza
Hut’s international arm was looking for new spokespeople. As a global brand,
then-Pizza Hut advertising executive Scott Helbing recalled in an interview, the
company “needed an idea that truly traveled across continents” for “a truly
global campaign that would play in any country in the world.”

Former BBDO art director Ted Shaine, who helped create the ad with Tom
Darbyshire, a young copywriter at the time, recalled that BBDO “heard that
[Gorbachev] was willing to do something.” Others suggest that somebody at BBDO
came up with the idea and sought Gorbachev out.

However it happened, the core idea of the ad remained stable throughout the
monthslong process of negotiating and filming it. It would not focus on
Gorbachev but on an ordinary Russian family eating at Pizza Hut. It would be
shot on location, featuring as many visuals that screamed “Russia” as possible.

The concept obviously exploited the shock value of having a former world leader
appear. But the ad played on the fact that Gorbachev was far more popular
outside Russia than inside it. As late as October 1991, a Wall Street
Journal/NBC News poll showed that 54 percent of Americans wanted to see
Gorbachev as the head of the Soviet Union, compared with only 18 percent for
Yeltsin. And warm feelings toward Gorbachev persisted in the West long after the
Soviet Union dissolved. “In contrast to his unpopular standing at home,” the
political scientist Andrew Cooper writes in Diplomatic Afterlives, “Gorbachev
retained superstar standing abroad as a visionary statesman.” At home, Gorbachev
was a pariah. Abroad, he was an elder statesman and celebrity, far more beloved
than the buffoonish Yeltsin.

Actually brokering the deal took months. Katie O’Neill Bistrian, now chief
marketing officer of the collaborative workspace firm Work Well Win, took on the
role of representing Gorbachev. Then in her mid-20s and a firebrand executive at
the sports and talent management company IMG who routinely brokered deals for
stars like Derek Jeter, she viewed the Gorbachev deal as something that she
could execute.

There was a hitch: IMG didn’t actually represent Gorbachev. Nobody did. O’Neill
Bistrian’s first challenge, then, was to work through contacts, particularly IMG
head Mark McCormack, to connect to people in Gorbachev’s circle to broker the
deal.

The negotiations took months. Partly, this represented a negotiating tactic: The
longer the negotiations drew out, the higher Gorbachev’s talent fee would be.
But it also represented real hesitation on Gorbachev’s part.

Taubman argues that Gorbachev’s loss of station and purpose hit his wife, Raisa
Gorbachev, hard, not least because it meant that the betrayals of 1991 were
compounded by public criticism and even charges of treason. Raisa likely feared
that the Pizza Hut ad could only further harm his reputation. On the other hand,
only international sources could provide the funds that Gorbachev needed. (The
exact amount that Gorbachev would receive for the commercial is secret, but it
may have been one of the largest talent fees in history—an amount that would be
easily in the seven figures today, adjusted for inflation.)

While Gorbachev’s circle prolonged the negotiations, O’Neill Bistrian told BBDO
that another figure was available: Muhammad Ali. IMG had just begun to represent
the once-polarizing figure, who, by the 1990s, had transformed into a beloved
national icon. Pizza Hut and BBDO leapt at the chance. (Concluding both the
Gorbachev and Ali deals would get O’Neill Bistrian her own endorsement deal, for
Samsung monitors—the only trace of O’Neill Bistrian’s involvement in the deal
until now.)

Gorbachev finally assented—with conditions. First, he would have final approval
over the script. That was acceptable. Second, he would not eat pizza on film.
That disappointed Pizza Hut. “We always wanted the hero of the ad to eat the
pizza,” Helbing said.

> “We always wanted the hero of the ad to eat the pizza,” Helbing said.

Gorbachev held firm. “‘As the ex-leader, I just would not,’” Helbing recalled
Gorbachev saying.

O’Neill Bistrian suggested a compromise: A family member would appear in the
spot instead. Gorbachev’s granddaughter Anastasia Virganskaya ended up eating
the slice. Pizza Hut accepted.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At last, filming could begin. Helbing, Shaine, Darbyshire, O’Neill Bistrian, the
director Peter Smillie, and several others flew to Moscow in November 1997.
Preproduction (casting, costuming, and location scouting) took several days
before principal photography, which took place over two days—one for the
exterior shots and one for the interior scenes.

BBDO Chairman Philip Dusenberry insisted that the agency’s advertisements be
cinematic in their quality. The Gorbachev production lived up to that standard.
Informed estimates put the commercial’s budget in the low millions of dollars.
Darbyshire, who wrote the script in English, went through three translators to
get the right level of idiomatic Russian. To capture the beautiful establishing
shots of Red Square and its domed churches, the crew hefted the film cameras
high atop the Kremlin itself. And somehow the production managed to get the
whole square shut down for the entire shoot.

(Incidentally, Red Square seems to have been chosen more for cinematic needs
than for veracity. The commercial shows a Pizza Hut storefront on Red Square
itself, but that’s fake—the Russian signage behind several Pizza Hut logos
establishes that the door Gorbachev and Virganskaya are filmed entering is
actually a jewelry store.)

The team encountered challenges. “The weather was horrible,” Shaine recalled:
low light, bitterly cold, and not even enough snow to make Red Square look as
Americans felt it should—until a couple of inches fell on the day of the shoot
itself. Worse, it wasn’t clear that the commercial would even happen. After
months of reluctance to agree to the shoot, Gorbachev arrived late, the first of
a few occasions when the BBDO team thought the agreement might collapse. (When
the former leader arrived at Red Square, Shaine greeted Gorbachev by saying,
“Well, this is a big production we’re involved in.” “I know,” Gorbachev replied
through his interpreter. “I’ve been to many big productions in this place.”)

The more important reason, Gorbachev confessed, was that he needed the money.

Filming the interior scenes took the better part of a day in a different
location, inside a real Moscow Pizza Hut. (Even though the bulk of the
commercial is just a conversation around a table, multiple sources stressed that
filming such a scene—with its complicated sightlines—is enormously challenging.)
Coincidentally, it also happened to be Thanksgiving Day in the United States.
Since the commercial was being shot at a working Pizza Hut, the cast and
crew—including Gorbachev—ate pizza, which was “one of the most interesting
Thanksgiving dinners I’ve ever had,” said Shaine, who was seated with Gorbachev.

In b-roll shot during the production, Helbing interviewed Gorbachev on camera.
Gorbachev justified his decision to do the commercial on two grounds. First, the
former leader argued, “pizza is for everyone.” It was nicely communal: “It’s not
only consumption. It’s also socializing.”

But the more important reason, Gorbachev confessed, was that he needed the
money.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Gorbachev commercial wasn’t just a piece of advertising ephemera. It was
also a multimillion-dollar short film—and the creators were as concerned with
artistic standards as selling pizza. Besides the expense and effort of the shoot
and the postproduction (an original score recorded live!), the dialogue is
entirely in Russian with English subtitles—even though Americans hate subtitles.

The aim of these choices was to show Pizza Hut as a global brand with, as
Helbing calls it, a “gravitas” that Little Caesars or Domino’s couldn’t match.
To do that, Darbyshire and Shaine tried to capture a story that would reflect
Russian reality—not just American stereotypes.

Yuval Weber, the Bren chair of Russian military and political strategy at Marine
Corps University’s Krulak Center, uses the commercial as a primary document in
his classes in Russian history to illustrate the stresses of the transition from
communism. Weber argues that Darbyshire and Shaine succeeded maybe even better
than they knew at depicting Russian life at that moment. “You have the
fundamental note of hope from the American side, that basically pizza or Western
culture can solve the really intractable problems of Russian politics,” Weber
said. “You have the Russians depicting a legitimate family—a stylized family
dispute on something important. The actors themselves are portraying very real
stereotypes about contemporary Moscow.”

“The disagreement about the big issues totally would have been plausible
describing the Moscow intelligentsia that those actors are portraying in the
commercial itself,” Weber said. “My guess, based on the clothes that the actors
chose or that the costume designers chose, is that grandmother is clearly a
philologist, some sort of drama teacher, literature teacher, foreign-language
teacher. Dad? He’s an engineer of some type. The son is a businessman. And they
represent the ’50s generation, the ’70s generation, and the ’90s generation.
That would have been beyond an American audience, but … I’ve always thought the
actors brought [those choices].”

You can also read the ad as a metatextual comment on itself. As Helbing
observed: “If you see the spot and hear what they’re kind of saying about what
he’s brought, that was truly what those actors were discussing. We would never
have been sitting in that Pizza Hut with Gorbachev eating a pizza if it hadn’t
been for what he had done.”

With filming concluded, the Americans flew back to the States. The footage went
to Clayton Hemmert, an editor and co-founder of the firm Crew Cuts, who had the
task of assembling a narrative from the raw footage. “When you get down to it,”
Hemmert said, “you have hundreds of thousands, millions, of frames of film that
could be juxtaposed in any order and put any sound behind it, so your options
are tremendous.” His smooth cutting of music and dialogue gave the ad its
chaotic, argumentative energy.

Pizza Hut gets to be not only the avatar of global capitalism but also the
restaurant that brings people together.

Hemmert played a key role in shaping the ending. “If you listen to that sound
‘Hail to Gorbachev,’ it sounds like the entire nation of Russia is chanting
‘Hail to Gorbachev,’” Hemmert said. The commercial closes with the cheers
resounding throughout Red Square and then all of Moscow in progressively wider
shots with celebratory music underneath. “It has this impression, you might say
the illusion, that the entire nation feels this is a wonderful thing that
happened.”

Of course, it is an illusion—in this case, taking the actor’s dialogue, adding
reverb, and layering the chants over each other. But it’s also one that suited
both the marketing needs of Pizza Hut and the myth-making needs of Gorbachev.
Pizza Hut gets to be not only the avatar of global capitalism but also the
restaurant that brings people together. In the commercial’s fiction, at least,
Gorbachev gets the hero’s reception that Raisa always thought he deserved.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yet the commercial itself is more open-ended than it might appear on first
viewing. “At the very end, when everyone is saying ‘Za Gorbacheva,’ it resounds
throughout Moscow and all the landmarks. But the last shot was an old lady, a
babushka, dressed in black who basically looks into a great distance. And in a
sense, it’s played for laughs. But that’s also her looking off into the future,
which is still unclear,” Weber said.

The future turned out to be much dimmer than the ad anticipated. A little less
than a year after the ad was filmed, in August 1998, the Russian financial
system collapsed. The economic recovery that had begun to take hold was wiped
out. As the Moscow Times wrote, “The whole Russian economy fell to pieces at a
stroke.”

Weber reflected on what that might have meant for the fictional family in the
commercial. “They would have been the ones crushed. The son, he’s exactly the
sort of guy who would have been overleveraged. Dad isn’t in great shape.
Grandmother hangs on but in worse shape because grandson probably can’t support
her as much,” he said. Whatever optimism made the pro-Gorbachev slant of the ad
even dimly plausible as a representative sampling of Muscovite opinion vanished.
News reports suggest that the Pizza Hut location in which the commercial was
filmed itself closed during the crash.

And that means that this fictional family, like most Russians, probably spent
the early 2000s supporting the increasingly hard-line Vladimir Putin, seeing him
as “the only person who can take them back to stability and potential for
growth,” Weber said. Out with pizza, in with the vertical of power.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Everyone with whom I spoke about making the commercial remembers it fondly. They
got to meet a world leader; they succeeded in drawing attention to the brand;
and the commercial received a unexpected second life online, keeping their work
alive in a profession where most product is disposable.

For Gorbachev, however, the ad’s legacy seems less bright—mostly because he
never found the path he’d meant for it to fund. The commercial funded his
foundation and loyal retainers for a while. Yet a year later, he told the
Guardian that he had lost his own savings in the 1998 crash.

> The commercial funded his foundation and loyal retainers for a while. Yet a
> year later, he told the Guardian that he had lost his own savings in the 1998
> crash.

Raisa died of cancer in 1999. And despite Gorbachev’s ambitions that his
post-presidency could push his country toward greater openness, Russia has
slipped ever further along a much less free path than he once envisioned.

> The commercial funded his foundation and loyal retainers for a while. Yet a
> year later, he told the Guardian that he had lost his own savings in the 1998
> crash.

This year, Putin commemorated two decades in power. A tightening of laws on
foreign support for nonprofits inside Russia squeezed the Gorbachev Foundation;
many of his family members have reportedly moved to Germany. In a book released
last month, Gorbachev even weakly offered praise for his successor on the
grounds that Putin “inherited chaos” and that his moves could be justified if
“the aim of authority is to create conditions for developing a strong modern
democracy.”

For Russians, the debate about his legacy that the ad foregrounded has been
conclusively resolved. In a 2018 poll by the respected Levada Center (another
byproduct of Gorbachev’s reforms), 66 percent of Russians responded that they
regretted the collapse of the Soviet Union. So, of course, does Gorbachev. His
ambition was to perfect the country, not to end it.

Yet Russians seem to blame him for the catastrophe. A 2017 Levada poll found
that only 1 percent of Russians expressed admiration for Gorbachev, 30 percent
professed to dislike him, and 13 percent said their overall attitude was one of
disgust or hatred. (Yeltsin, who died in 2007, received almost identical
ratings.) As a leader, Russians rank Gorbachev well below Joseph Stalin.

No Russian crowd, in other words, is going to chant “Hail to Gorbachev!” anytime
soon.

My FP: Follow topics and authors to get straight to what you like. Exclusively
for FP subscribers. Subscribe Now | Log In

* Russia

Paul Musgrave is an assistant professor of political science at the University
of Massachusetts Amherst.

foreignpolicy.com Open in urlscan Pro 2606:4700:20::ac43:449f Public Scan

Form analysis 2 forms found in the DOM

GET /

GET /

Text Content

foreignpolicy.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:20::ac43:449f Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM