www.userbenchmark.com Open in urlscan Pro
54.39.161.167  Public Scan

Submitted URL: http://www.userbenchmark.com/
Effective URL: https://www.userbenchmark.com/
Submission: On January 05 via manual from GB — Scanned from CA

Form analysis 6 forms found in the DOM

Name: navFormPOST /pages/home.jsf?tab=Top

<form id="navForm" name="navForm" method="post" action="/pages/home.jsf?tab=Top" onsubmit="detailsSearchNaviation( $(this).find('.acomptarget').attr('href'));return false;" style="margin-bottom: 0px;">
  <input type="hidden" name="navForm" value="navForm">
  <input id="navForm:ajaxJSON" type="hidden" name="navForm:ajaxJSON"><a id="navForm:sendJSON" href="#" onclick="mojarra.ab(this,event,'action','navForm:ajaxJSON','@none');return false"></a>
  <div class="top-menu pagebounds container-fluid">
    <div class="ajaxProgress">
      <div class="ajaxProgressHead"></div>
    </div>
    <div class="top-menu-upper headergrad">
      <div>
        <div class="top-menu-left">
          <a style="height:40px;padding-left:0;border-radius:0;font-size:26px;line-height:36px;" class="fastinslowout semi-strong" href="https://www.userbenchmark.com" tabindex="-1">UserBenchmark</a>
          <a href="https://www.userbenchmark.com/ROU-User/User?id=154" tabindex="-1">
	                <i class="fa fa-user fa-lg ambertext"></i> ROU-User <i class="flag flag-ro"></i></a>
          <select class="prcloc-sel" title="Price currency" tabindex="-1">
            <option value="ro" selected="selected">ro</option>
            <option value="us">us</option>
            <option value="uk">uk</option>
            <option value="ca">ca</option>
            <option value="es">es</option>
            <option value="fr">fr</option>
            <option value="de">de</option>
            <option value="it">it</option>
          </select>
        </div>
        <div class="top-menu-right row" style="height:25px;width:50%">
          <div class="col-xs-9 col-xs-offset-3 top-menu-search-w "><input id="navForm:searchInput" type="text" name="navForm:searchInput" autocomplete="off" value="" class="top-menu-search-input mhautoselonfocus form-control ui-autocomplete-input">
            <i class="fa fa-search fa-lg" style="position:absolute;top:14px;right:25px;"></i><a href="/Search?" onclick="detailsSearchNaviation(this.href);return false;" style="display:none;" class="acomptarget"></a>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="top-menu-lower">
      <div class="top-menu-left">
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://cpu.userbenchmark.com">CPU</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://gpu.userbenchmark.com">GPU</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://ssd.userbenchmark.com">SSD</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://hdd.userbenchmark.com">HDD</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://ram.userbenchmark.com">RAM</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://usb.userbenchmark.com">USB</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://www.userbenchmark.com/EFps/Compare">EFPS</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://www.userbenchmark.com/Search?searchTerm=FPS">FPS</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://www.userbenchmark.com/SkillBench">SkillBench</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout" href="https://www.youtube.com/c/UserBenchmarks"><span style="position:absolute;margin-left:6px;font-size:8px;color:white">►</span><i style="width:21px" class="fa fa-youtube-play fa-lg brightredtext"></i> YouTube</a>
      </div>
      <div class="top-menu-right">
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-9600K-vs-Group-/4031vs10">COMPARE</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://www.userbenchmark.com/PCBuilder">BUILD</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="/Software">TEST</a>
        <a class="fastinslowout " href="https://www.userbenchmark.com/page/about">ABOUT</a>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div><input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="j_id1:javax.faces.ViewState:0" value="2980145536776859264:9216330616281716720" autocomplete="off">
</form>

Name: ratingDialogFormPOST https://www.userbenchmark.com/

<form id="ratingDialogForm" name="ratingDialogForm" method="post" action="https://www.userbenchmark.com/" enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded">
  <input type="hidden" name="ratingDialogForm" value="ratingDialogForm">
  <a id="ratingDialogForm:j_idt179" href="#" onclick="mojarra.ab(this,event,'action','ratingDialogForm:myRatingModalComponentWrapper','notForm:userNot @form recentRatingsForm',{'onevent':MHAjaxLightsOnOffAndScroll});return false" class="mh-ajax-controller"><input type="hidden" name="ratingDialogForm:j_idt181"></a><input
    id="ratingDialogForm:hinputid" type="hidden" name="ratingDialogForm:hinputid"><a id="ratingDialogForm:ratdidpopup" href="#" onclick="mojarra.ab(this,event,'action','ratingDialogForm:hinputid','notForm:userNot @form');return false"></a>
  <script>
    document.getElementById('ratingDialogForm').setAttribute('action', window.location);
  </script><span id="ratingDialogForm:myRatingModalComponentWrapper">
    <div id="myRatingModal" class="modal fade" style="display:none;" tabindex="-1">
      <div class="modal-dialog mh-dialog">
        <div class="modal-content">
          <div class="modal-header">
            <img style="height:36px;float:left;margin-right:10px;">
            <button type="button" class="close" data-dismiss="modal">×</button>
            <h4 style="white-space:nowrap;overflow:hidden;line-height:36px;" class="modal-title"> </h4>
          </div>
          <div class="modal-body">
            <div class="form-group">
              <div class="mh-star-rating-w"><input id="ratingDialogForm:mh-star-rating" type="text" name="ratingDialogForm:mh-star-rating" value="0.0">
              </div>
            </div>
            <div class="form-group"><textarea name="ratingDialogForm:j_idt187" class="medp form-control" style="height:83px;" placeholder="Optionally write your reason here"></textarea>
              <span class="mh-clicakble mutedtext" style="float:right;padding:0 7px 7px 7px;;margin-right:-7px;font-size:15px;display:block;" onclick="ratingDialogCommentExpand(this);"><i class="fa fa-arrow-down"></i></span>
            </div>
          </div>
          <div class="modal-footer">
            <button type="button" class="btn btn-default btn-block btn-xl" onclick="ratingDialogAction(this,{sprAction:'savepr',rid:'0',pid:'0',mid:''})">Save as guest</button>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </span><input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="j_id1:javax.faces.ViewState:1" value="2980145536776859264:9216330616281716720" autocomplete="off">
</form>

Name: wikiLinkDialogFormPOST https://www.userbenchmark.com/

<form id="wikiLinkDialogForm" name="wikiLinkDialogForm" method="post" action="https://www.userbenchmark.com/">
  <input type="hidden" name="wikiLinkDialogForm" value="wikiLinkDialogForm">
  <a id="wikiLinkDialogForm:j_idt201" href="#" onclick="mojarra.ab(this,event,'action','wikiLinkDialogForm:myWikiLinkModalComponentWrapper','notForm:userNot @form recentRatingsForm',{'onevent':MHAjaxLightsOnOffAndScroll});return false" class="mh-ajax-controller"><input type="hidden" name="wikiLinkDialogForm:j_idt203"></a><input
    id="wikiLinkDialogForm:hinputwid" type="hidden"
    name="wikiLinkDialogForm:hinputwid"><a id="wikiLinkDialogForm:wikididpopup" href="#" onclick="mojarra.ab(this,event,'action','wikiLinkDialogForm:hinputwid','notForm:userNot @form');return false"></a>
  <script>
    document.getElementById('wikiLinkDialogForm').setAttribute('action', window.location);

    function popWikiDialog(optmap) {
      var combined = {};
      combined['fn'] = 'pop';
      var combined = {
        fn: 'pop',
        popAction: 'popWik'
      };
      for (var attrname in optmap) {
        combined[attrname] = optmap[attrname];
      }
      document.getElementById('wikiLinkDialogForm:hinputwid').value = JSON.stringify(combined);
      document.getElementById('wikiLinkDialogForm:wikididpopup').click();
    }

    function wikiDialogAction(src, optmap) {
      $('#myWikiLinkModal').modal('hide');
      var combined = {
        fn: 'swi'
      };
      for (var attrname in optmap) {
        combined[attrname] = optmap[attrname];
      }
      sendJSON_FRC(src, combined);
    }
  </script><span id="wikiLinkDialogForm:myWikiLinkModalComponentWrapper">
    <div id="myWikiLinkModal" class="modal fade" style="display: none" tabindex="-1">
      <div class="modal-dialog mh-dialog">
        <div class="modal-content">
          <div class="modal-header">
            <img style="height:36px;float:left;margin-right:10px;">
            <button type="button" class="close" data-dismiss="modal">×</button>
            <h4 style="white-space:nowrap;overflow:hidden;line-height:36px;" class="modal-title"> </h4>
          </div>
          <div class="modal-body form-horizontal">
            <div class="container-fluid">
              <div class="form-group">
                <div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-2">
                  <h4 class="form-control-static">Share a related link</h4>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div class="form-group">
                <label class="col-sm-2 control-label">Link Type</label>
                <div class="col-sm-4"><select name="wikiLinkDialogForm:j_idt213" class="form-control" size="1">
                    <option value="Deal">Deal</option>
                    <option value="Discussion">Discussion</option>
                    <option value="Tutorial">Tutorial</option>
                    <option value="Review">Review</option>
                    <option value="Info">Info</option>
                    <option value="Suggestion">Suggestion</option>
                    <option value="Amusement">Amusement</option>
                    <option value="Comment">Comment</option>
                    <option value="Image">Image</option>
                  </select>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div class="form-group">
                <label class="col-sm-2 control-label">Link</label>
                <div class="col-sm-10"><input type="text" name="wikiLinkDialogForm:j_idt224" class="form-control">
                </div>
              </div>
              <div class="form-group">
                <label class="col-sm-2 control-label">Description</label>
                <div class="col-sm-10"><textarea name="wikiLinkDialogForm:j_idt226" class="form-control" style="height:120px;"></textarea>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          <div class="modal-footer">
            <div class="btn-group btn-group-justified">
              <div class="btn-group">
                <button type="button" class="btn btn-default btn-lg" onclick="wikiDialogAction(this,{swiAction:'savewi',rid:'0',wid:'0'})">Save as guest</button>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </span><input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="j_id1:javax.faces.ViewState:2" value="2980145536776859264:9216330616281716720" autocomplete="off">
</form>

Name: recentRatingsFormPOST /pages/home.jsf?tab=Top

<form id="recentRatingsForm" name="recentRatingsForm" method="post" action="/pages/home.jsf?tab=Top">
  <input type="hidden" name="recentRatingsForm" value="recentRatingsForm">
  <input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="j_id1:javax.faces.ViewState:3" value="2980145536776859264:9216330616281716720" autocomplete="off">
</form>

Name: feedbackDialogFormPOST /pages/home.jsf

<form id="feedbackDialogForm" name="feedbackDialogForm" method="post" action="/pages/home.jsf" enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded">
  <input type="hidden" name="feedbackDialogForm" value="feedbackDialogForm">
  <input id="feedbackDialogForm:hinputfid" type="hidden"
    name="feedbackDialogForm:hinputfid"><a id="feedbackDialogForm:feedbackdidpopup" href="#" onclick="mojarra.ab(this,event,'action','feedbackDialogForm:hinputfid','notForm:userNot @form',{'onevent':showFeedbackModal});return false"></a>
  <script>
    function showFeedbackModal(event) {
      if (event.status == "success") $('#myFeedbackModal').modal('show');
    }

    function feedbackDialogAction(optmap) {
      var combined = {};
      combined['fn'] = 'sfb';
      for (var attrname in optmap) {
        combined[attrname] = optmap[attrname];
      }
      document.getElementById('feedbackDialogForm:hinputfid').value = JSON.stringify(combined);
      document.getElementById('feedbackDialogForm:feedbackdidpopup').click();
    }
  </script>
  <div id="myFeedbackModal" class="modal fade" tabindex="-1">
    <div class="modal-dialog mh-dialog">
      <div class="modal-content">
        <div class="modal-header">
          <button type="button" class="close" data-dismiss="modal">×</button>
          <h4 style="white-space:nowrap;overflow:hidden;line-height:36px;" class="modal-title">Feedback</h4>
        </div>
        <div class="modal-body"><input type="hidden" name="feedbackDialogForm:j_idt384">
          <div class="form-group hidden">
            <label class="control-label">Link</label><input type="text" name="feedbackDialogForm:j_idt386" class="form-control" maxlength="255" placeholder="e.g. https://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-970">
          </div>
          <div class="form-group">
            <label class="control-label">Please enter your feedback here</label><textarea name="feedbackDialogForm:j_idt388" class="form-control" style="height:120px;" maxlength="1000"></textarea>
          </div>
          <div class="form-group ">
            <label class="control-label">Email</label><input type="text" name="feedbackDialogForm:j_idt390" class="form-control" maxlength="255" placeholder="Optionally enter your email if you would prefer a response">
          </div>
        </div>
        <div class="modal-footer">
          <div style="float:right"><input id="feedbackDialogForm:j_idt392" type="submit" name="feedbackDialogForm:j_idt392" value="Submit" class="btn btn-warning"
              onclick="jsf.util.chain(this,event,'$(\'#myFeedbackModal\').modal(\'hide\')','mojarra.ab(this,event,\'action\',\'@form\',\'notForm:userNot\')');return false">
            <a href="#" class="btn btn-default" data-dismiss="modal">Cancel</a>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div><input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="j_id1:javax.faces.ViewState:4" value="2980145536776859264:9216330616281716720" autocomplete="off">
</form>

Name: notFormPOST /pages/home.jsf

<form id="notForm" name="notForm" method="post" action="/pages/home.jsf" enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded">
  <input type="hidden" name="notForm" value="notForm">
  <div id="notForm:userNot">
    <div class="nb-parent" style="cursor:initial;top:initial;bottom:0;display:block;border-bottom:0;height:60px;">Cookies help us deliver a better site. Our partners will collect data and use cookies for<br>ad personalization and measurement. By
      using our site, you agree to our use of cookies.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class="orangetext" href="/page/privacy#cookies">Learn more</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; <a id="notForm:j_idt399" href="#" onclick="mojarra.ab(this,event,'action','@form','@form');return false" class="btn btn-xs btn-success strong">Got it
						</a>
    </div>
  </div><input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="j_id1:javax.faces.ViewState:5" value="2980145536776859264:9216330616281716720" autocomplete="off">
</form>

Text Content

UserBenchmark ROU-User ro us uk ca es fr de it

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB EFPS FPS SkillBench ► YouTube
COMPARE BUILD TEST ABOUT


USERBENCHMARK

Speed test your PC in less than a minute.
 49,328,945 PCs Free Download YouTube
1,710,283 Components     246,875,288 Benchmarks     3,078,551 Votes

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB

New Hardware



INTEL CORE I5-12600K LEI 1,183

Intel’s latest 10-core i5-12600K Alder Lake desktop processor offers an
impressive 50% 64-core performance improvement over it's predecessor. The 12600K
combines six hyper-threaded Golden Cove P-cores with clock speeds up to 4.9 GHz
and four energy efficient Gracemont E-cores for a total of 16 threads. Alder
Lake CPUs have a new LGA 1700 socket which requires new cooler brackets and a
new Z690 motherboard. Z690 brings several new features including PCIe 5.0 and
DDR5 memory. Most Z690 boards will ship in both DDR4 and DDR5 variants. DDR4 is
likely the better option, at least until DDR5 prices settle. With an MRSP of
just $290 USD, the 12600K is both cheaper and faster than the competition in
both single and, notably, multi-core performance. As a result, even AMD's
prolific marketing infrastructure (youtube, reddit, forums etc.) will struggle
to drive sales, at least until Zen 4 launches (est. late 2022). In the meantime,
Intel's i5-12600K is the obvious choice for consumers that do not wish to pay
over the odds for almost unparalleled performance in the majority of workloads
including gaming. That said, gamers that already own a K series CPU from the 8th
gen. or higher will see limited gains in the majority of titles when paired with
a 3060 (or lower) tier GPU. In some cases (e.g. PUBG or Overwatch) gamers will
see fewer frame drops by disabling the E-Cores all together. If recent history
is a guide, stock levels at MSRP are likely to deplete rapidly. [Nov '21 CPUPro]


NVIDIA RTX 3060-TI LEI 1,604

The RTX 3060 Ti is Nvidia’s latest 3000 series GPU. Assuming it (ever…) comes
into stock at $400 USD, it will take the crown as the best value for money
graphics card. Nvidia’s new Ampere architecture, which supersedes Turing, offers
both improved power efficiency and performance. The 3060 Ti features 4,864 CUDA
cores, 152 Tensor cores, it has a boost clock of 1.665 GHz, 8 GB of memory and a
power draw of just 200 W. Nvidia’s entire 3000 series lineup offers once in a
decade price/performance improvements. The 3060 Ti beats the previous
generation’s 2060 Super by 35% in terms of effective speed at the same MSRP.
Given the widespread issues AMD users are facing with 5000 series GPUs
(blue/black screens etc.), AMD’s 6000 series GPU’s will have to see substantial
price cuts and a huge marketing effort in order to gain any traction. Meanwhile,
Christmas has come early for PC gamers who can look forward to an unparalleled
gaming experience in class leading titles such as Cyberpunk 2077. At ultra
settings, with ray tracing enabled, Cyberpunk 2077 redefines the boundaries of
immersive gaming. It makes GTA5 look like Tetris in comparison. The combination
of RTX+DLSS delivers stunning graphics that are several tiers higher than both
AMD's best discrete GPUs and the upcoming consoles. In terms of real world
performance, Nvidia’s 3000 series has more or less put AMD’s Radeon group in
checkmate. Nonetheless, AMD’s marketers are capable of delivering elaborate BS
albeit whilst struggling to keep a straight face. Their marketing infrastructure
outsold Intel in the CPU market despite a 15% performance deficit. Without an
appropriate social media marketing strategy, Nvidia will probably lose
considerable market share, for all the wrong reasons. [Dec '20 GPUPro]

1327 Processors Compared



INTEL CORE I5-11600K LEI 1,002

The i5-11600K is the best value "top tier" CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S
lineup. With a simple overclock it offers almost the same levels of performance
as the 11900K. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which
translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and
AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell
Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their
marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread
disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs
more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers
that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review
them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to
leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering
benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real
users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game
benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the
in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable
video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At
every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of
blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due
to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net
30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share
despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look
no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]


AMD RYZEN 5 5600X LEI 1,127

The Ryzen 5 5600X is both the entry-level and best value for money 5000 series
CPU. The 5600X is a hex-core 12 thread processor with a base clock speed of 3.7
GHz boosting to 4.6 GHz. It has 35 MB of cache and a TDP rating of 65W. A cooler
is included in the MSRP of $300 USD, but cheap after-market coolers (such as the
$20 GAMMAXX 400) are far more effective and therefore worth the upgrade.
Notably, AMD’s new Zen 3 architecture has vastly improved single-core
performance and lower memory latency, which leads to a significant effective
speed advantage over its predecessor, the 3600X. Last year, AMD’s class-leading
marketers secured significant sales of the 3000 series CPUs despite a 15%
performance deficit against lower priced Intel parts. The games, specific
scenes, software/hardware settings and choice of competing hardware were often
cherry picked, undisclosed and inconsistent from one product to the next. Now
that AMD have actually achieved both top tier performance and market share,
their marketing machinery is focused on price hikes. Users that do not wish to
pay a marketing premium should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, which, when
paired with a 2060 Super, delivers higher EFps in four out of five of today’s
most popular games. Allocating the savings to a higher tier GPU will result in a
far superior gaming PC. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

667 Graphics Cards Compared



NVIDIA RTX 3070 LEI 2,005

Nvidia’s 3070 GPU offers once in a decade price/performance improvements: a 3070
offers 45% higher effective speed than a 2070 at the same MSRP. Given the
widespread issues AMD users are facing with 5000 series GPUs (blue/black screens
etc.), it is unlikely that AMD would have posed a rational threat to Nvidia’s
market share this year. Nvidia’s price cuts are likely related to upcoming
console updates. The seven year old hardware in both the Xbox One and
Playstation 4 is due an update later this year. Whatever the motivation behind
Nvidia’s price cuts, Christmas has come early for PC gamers who can look forward
to an unparalleled gaming experience in class leading titles such as Cyberpunk
2077. At ultra settings, with ray tracing enabled, Cyberpunk 2077 redefines the
boundaries of immersive gaming. It makes GTA5 look like Tetris in comparison.
The combination of RTX+DLSS delivers stunning graphics that are several tiers
higher than both AMD's best discrete GPUs and the upcoming consoles. In terms of
real world performance, Nvidia’s 3000 series has more or less put AMD’s Radeon
group in checkmate. Nonetheless, AMD’s marketers are capable of delivering
elaborate BS albeit whilst struggling to keep a straight face. Their marketing
infrastructure outsold Intel in the CPU market despite a 15% performance
deficit. Without an appropriate social media marketing strategy, Nvidia will
probably lose considerable market share, for all the wrong reasons. [Oct
'20 GPUPro]


NVIDIA GTX 1660S (SUPER) LEI 962

The GTX 1660 Super has a launch price of just $230 USD with comparable
performance to the $280 USD 1660 Ti. The 1660 Super has 14 Gbps GDDR6 (versus
12Gbps GDDR6 for the 1660 Ti and 8Gbps GDDR5 for the 1660). The 1660 range of
cards sit in the sweet spot for many gamers because they offer superb 1080p EFps
in popular titles and they are relatively hassle free in terms of noise,
compatibility and stability. The 1660S also features Turing NVENC which is far
more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to
use a dedicated stream PC. Shop prices will determine which 1660 series card
represents the best value over time but at today's prices the 1660 Super
effectively undercuts the 1660 Ti by $50 USD thus challenging the RX 590 in
terms of overall value at 1080p. The next step up from the 1660S would be to the
$325 RTX 2060. [Oct '19 GPUPro]

1058 Solid State Drives Compared



CRUCIAL MX500 250GB LEI 198

The MX500 is Crucial’s current flagship consumer SATA SSD featuring their latest
second generation 64-layer 3D TLC NAND. It’s available in 250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB
and 2 TB capacities in a 2.5-inch form factor. All but the 2 TB version will
also be available in M.2 (2280) form in the future. The MX500 features a Silicon
Motion SM2258 controller which is a change from the Marvell 88SS1074 controller
featured in the MX300 (it’s nearly two year old predecessor). Performance is
around 30% better than on the MX300 which currently retails at the same price.
The MX500 has an SLC cache which increases with drive capacity. Consequently,
the larger capacities are better able to sustain high sequential write speeds.
The 250 GB version has 250MB of SLC cache, the 500 GB has 512 MB, the 1 TB has 1
GB and the 2 TB has 2 GB. Extended sustained write performance tests show that
even though speed does drop off after the cache has been exhausted, it is still
maintained at very respectable levels. The MX500’s five year warranty is in line
with Samsung’s 850 Evo and exceeds it in terms of endurance (just 75 TBW for the
250 GB 850 Evo versus 100 TBW for the 250 GB MX500). It doesn’t quite match up
to the Samsung’s 850 Evo’s performance (effective speed 8% slower), however at
current prices it is about 20% cheaper, and on balance offers better value for
money. [Mar '18 SSDrivePro]


SAMSUNG 970 EVO PLUS NVME PCIE M.2 500GB LEI 281

The 970 Evo Plus offers excellent sustained write performance both in and out of
cache. This results in consistent performance even when the drive is nearly
full. Samsung also have a great track record for reliability, this drive will
likely last a lifetime. The larger capacity drives (1TB+) offer even better
write performance and may be more appropriate for some users. We use this drive
(and its larger siblings) extensively in our EFps Lab at UserBenchmark. [Feb
'20 SSDrivePro]

1015 Hard Drives Compared



SEAGATE BARRACUDA 3TB (2016) LEI 341

The new 3TB Seagate Barracuda 2016 (ST3000DM008) replaces its hugely successful
predecessor, the 3TB Barracuda 7200.14 2011 (ST3000DM001). Comparing performance
between the two models shows that the newer drive has 12% faster sequential
speeds, comparable 4K speeds, improved mixed sequential speed and reduced mixed
4K speed. Overall, the effective speed is 12% faster on the 2016 model. Since
there is normally little price difference between the two models the 2016
version is the clear winner especially for use as a backup drive with its
impressive sequential read and write speeds of nearly 200 MBps. See the current
value leaders here. [Feb '17 HDrivePro]


SEAGATE BARRACUDA 1TB (2016) LEI 172

The 1TB Seagate Barracuda 2016 (ST1000DM010) has an impressive performance
profile. With Sequential read/writes averaging 173 and 159 MBps respectively,
the Barracuda can make short work of even moderately large backups. The small
file (4K) performance profile is less impressive but still adequate with average
read/writes coming in at 0.87 and 1.53 MBps respectively. For use as OS drives,
rotational disks are quickly loosing market share to SSDs which offer orders of
magnitude faster 4k read/write speeds. On the other hand cheap TLC based SSDs
often have slower sustained write speeds than their rotational counterparts.
Reasonably good overall performance can be achieved by using a TLC SSD to host
the OS and a larger rotational drive such as the Barracuda for backups and media
files. Larger capacity variants of this drive offer both better performance and
better value for money. [Feb '17 HDrivePro]

PC CPU GPU SSD RAM HDD USB
49,328,945 PCs tested.

PC
Score 
PC
Status 6 secs agoLenovo 82N6Nuclear submarine60% 6 secs agoLenovo 82JNNuclear
submarine83% 7 secs agoLenovo 10A7000LGEBattleship29% 11 secs agoGigabyte
GA-B550M DS3HNuclear submarine53% 12 secs agoLenovo 20238Yacht55% 14 secs
agoDell OptiPlex 3020Battle cruiser69% 16 secs agoAsus H81M-EBattleship37% 16
secs agoGA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2Nuclear submarine47% 17 secs agoDell Latitude
E5450Jet ski29% 18 secs agoROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI...Tree trunk91% 20 secs
agoZ170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)Nuclear submarine73% 22 secs agoGA-B550 AORUS ELITE
V2UFO85% 23 secs agoFujitsu ESPRIMO E720Battle cruiser61% 27 secs agoGigabyte
GA-Z170X-Gaming 5Nuclear submarine80% 29 secs agoAsus P8Z68-V LEBattleship50% 31
secs agoGA-B550 AORUS PRO ACUFO79% 35 secs agoLenovo 20Q0CTO1WWYacht29% 36 secs
agoDell OptiPlex 3040Yacht39% 36 secs agoLenovo 3664C44Battle cruiser62% 39 secs
agoMSI MS-16P5Battleship86%

TEST
YOUR PC

VOTES

↑  Intel Core i7-4790DEU-User, 34 secs ago. ↑  Nvidia RTX 3080-TiGBR-User, 11
mins ago. ↑  Intel Core i5-4440TWN-User, 40 mins ago. ↓  Nvidia GTX 760CAN-User,
47 mins ago. ↑  Intel Core i5-10400FUSA-User, 51 mins ago. ↓  Intel Core
i3-9100FPAK-User, 1 hr ago. ↑  AMD Ryzen 5 3600FIN-User, 1 hr ago. ↑  Nvidia GTX
750-TiIRN-User, 1 hr ago. ↓  Nvidia GTX 1050-TiIDN-User, 1 hr ago. ↑  Nvidia GTX
970IDN-User, 1 hr ago. ↑  Intel Core i5-9400FGBR-User, 1 hr ago. ↑  Nvidia GTX
1650TUR-User, 1 hr ago. ↓  Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)THA-User, 1 hr ago. ↑  Intel
Core i5-9400FTHA-User, 1 hr ago. ↑  Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)USA-User, 1 hr ago.
↑  Nvidia RTX 3070-TiKHM-User, 1 hr ago. ↑  AMD RX 6900-XTGBR-User, 1 hr ago.
↑  Nvidia RTX 3060FRA-User, 1 hr ago.

NEW PRODUCTS

›  Intel Core i5-12700FCPUPro, 2 days ago. ›  Intel Core i5-12500CPUPro, 2 days
ago. ›  Intel Core i5-12400CPUPro, 2 days ago. ›  Intel Core i5-12400FCPUPro, 2
days ago. ›  Intel Core i5-12600KCPUPro, 2 months ago. ›  Intel Core
i7-12700KCPUPro, 2 months ago. ›  Intel Core i9-12900KCPUPro, 2 months ago.
›  AMD RX 6600-XTGPUPro, 4 months ago. ›  Nvidia RTX 3070-TiGPUPro, 6 months
ago. ›  Nvidia RTX 3080-TiGPUPro, 7 months ago. ›  Intel Core i5-11600KCPUPro, 9
months ago. ›  Intel Core i5-11400CPUPro, 9 months ago. ›  Intel Core
i5-11400FCPUPro, 9 months ago. ›  Intel Core i9-11900KCPUPro, 9 months ago.
›  AMD RX 6700-XTGPUPro, 9 months ago. ›  Publisher HardwareLUXXBenchPro, 10
months ago. ›  Intel Core i7-11700KCPUPro, 10 months ago. ›  Nvidia RTX
3060GPUPro, 10 months ago. ›  Publisher Optimum TechBenchPro, 10 months ago.


ADVERTISEMENT
×




Save as guest
×



SHARE A RELATED LINK

Link Type
Deal Discussion Tutorial Review Info Suggestion Amusement Comment Image
Link

Description

Save as guest


The Best.

CPUGPUSSDIntel Core i5-12600K $295Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB
$49Intel Core i5-11600K $250Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52Intel
Core i7-11700K $349Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200

HDDRAMUSBSeagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16
2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX
DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)
$70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback
×

FEEDBACK

Link
Please enter your feedback here
Email
Cancel
Cookies help us deliver a better site. Our partners will collect data and use
cookies for
ad personalization and measurement. By using our site, you agree to our use of
cookies.  Learn more   Got it