www.nytimes.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.65.164  Public Scan

URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/24/us/politics/supreme-court-idaho-abortion-ban-case.html
Submission: On April 24 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 2 forms found in the DOM

POST https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/24/us/politics/supreme-court-idaho-abortion-ban-case.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083

<form method="post" action="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/24/us/politics/supreme-court-idaho-abortion-ban-case.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"
  data-testid="MagicLinkForm" style="visibility: hidden;"><input name="client_id" type="hidden" value="web.fwk.vi"><input name="redirect_uri" type="hidden"
    value="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/24/us/politics/supreme-court-idaho-abortion-ban-case.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"><input name="response_type"
    type="hidden" value="code"><input name="state" type="hidden" value="no-state"><input name="scope" type="hidden" value="default"></form>

POST https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/24/us/politics/supreme-court-idaho-abortion-ban-case.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083

<form method="post" action="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/24/us/politics/supreme-court-idaho-abortion-ban-case.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"
  data-testid="MagicLinkForm" style="visibility: hidden;"><input name="client_id" type="hidden" value="web.fwk.vi"><input name="redirect_uri" type="hidden"
    value="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/24/us/politics/supreme-court-idaho-abortion-ban-case.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"><input name="response_type"
    type="hidden" value="code"><input name="state" type="hidden" value="no-state"><input name="scope" type="hidden" value="default"></form>

Text Content

Skip to contentSkip to site indexSearch & Section NavigationSection Navigation
SEARCH
Politics

SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEKLog in
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Today’s Paper
SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEK

U.S. Abortion Landscape

 * Arizona’s Abortion Ban
 * Tracking Abortion Laws
 * Abortion Pill Case
 * Abortion Shield Laws
 * Effects of Bans on Births

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT





Supported by

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT





SUPREME COURT TO EXAMINE CLASH BETWEEN IDAHO ABORTION BAN AND FEDERAL LAW

The case, which could reverberate beyond Idaho to other states with abortion
bans, is the second time in less than a month that the justices have heard an
abortion case.

Listen to this article · 7:37 min Learn more
 * Share full article
 * 
 * 
 * 30
 * Read in app
   


Protesters near the Idaho State Capitol in Boise after the Supreme Court
overturned the constitutional right to abortion in June 2022. In August of that
year, the state’s near-total ban on the procedure went into
effect.Credit...Angie Smith for The New York Times

By Abbie VanSickle

Reporting from Washington

April 24, 2024, 5:04 a.m. ET
Sign up for the On Politics newsletter.  Your guide to the 2024 elections. Get
it sent to your inbox.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Wednesday about whether Idaho’s
near-total abortion ban conflicts with a federal law that protects patients who
need emergency care, in a case that would determine access to abortions in
emergency rooms across the country.

The federal law affects only the sliver of women who face dire medical
complications during pregnancy. But a broad decision by the court could have
implications for the about 14 states that have enacted near-total bans on
abortion since the court overturned a constitutional right to abortion in June
2022.

The case may also have broader consequences if the justices adopt language about
fetal personhood, some legal scholars argue, an increasingly polarizing fight
that surfaced recently in Alabama, after its top court ruled that frozen embryos
in test tubes should be considered children.

The dispute is the second time in less than a month that the Supreme Court is
grappling with abortion. It is a potent reminder that even after Justice Samuel
A. Alito Jr. vowed in 2022 that the issue of abortion would return to elected
representatives in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, it continues to
make its way back to the court. In late March, the justices considered the
availability of the abortion pill mifepristone.



Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT



The federal law at issue, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or
EMTALA, enacted by Congress in 1986, mandates that hospitals receiving federal
funds provide patients with stabilizing care.

The Biden administration maintains that this law collides with — and should
override — Idaho’s near-total abortion ban. Under the state law, the procedure
is illegal except in cases of incest, rape or when it is “necessary to prevent
the death of the pregnant woman,” and doctors who perform abortions could face
criminal penalties. Lawyers for the state contend that the administration has
maneuvered the federal law in a way that would bypass state bans.

Subscribe to The Times to read as many articles as you like.



Abbie VanSickle covers the United States Supreme Court for The Times. She is a
lawyer and has an extensive background in investigative reporting. More about
Abbie VanSickle

Read 30 Comments
 * Share full article
 * 
 * 
 * 30
 * Read in app
   





Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT




COMMENTS 30

Supreme Court to Examine Clash Between Idaho Abortion Ban and Federal LawSkip to
Comments
Share your thoughts.
The Times needs your voice. We welcome your on-topic commentary, criticism and
expertise. Comments are moderated for civility.




SITE INDEX




SITE INFORMATION NAVIGATION

 * © 2024 The New York Times Company

 * NYTCo
 * Contact Us
 * Accessibility
 * Work with us
 * Advertise
 * T Brand Studio
 * Your Ad Choices
 * Privacy Policy
 * Terms of Service
 * Terms of Sale
 * Site Map
 * Canada
 * International
 * Help
 * Subscriptions



Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

See subscription options