www.supplychaindive.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
2606:4700::6812:1757
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://link.supplychaindive.com/click/32247459.40046/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuc3VwcGx5Y2hhaW5kaXZlLmNvbS90cmVuZGxpbmUvbGFzdC1taWxlLWRlbGl...
Effective URL: https://www.supplychaindive.com/trendline/last-mile-delivery/352/?utm_source=MFG&utm_medium=Library&utm_campaign=PitneyBowes&utm...
Submission: On August 01 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://www.supplychaindive.com/trendline/last-mile-delivery/352/?utm_source=MFG&utm_medium=Library&utm_campaign=PitneyBowes&utm...
Submission: On August 01 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
3 forms found in the DOMName: signup-inter-form — POST /signup/
<form id="signup-inter-form" class="form-basic" name="signup-inter-form" action="/signup/" method="POST">
<input type="hidden" name="signup_box_location" value="interstitial">
<input type="hidden" name="signup_initial_url_path" value="">
<h1> Don’t miss tomorrow’s supply chain industry news </h1>
<p class="interstitial-text"> Let Supply Chain Dive’s free newsletter keep you informed, straight from your inbox. </p>
<p class="form-error__message" id="interstitial-error"></p>
<div id="form-interstitial">
<input type="email" name="email" placeholder="Work email address" class="email" required="" id="id_5ed468_email">
<div id="newsletter-list-section">
<ul id="id_5ed468_site_newsletters" class="list-no-bullets">
<li><label for="id_5ed468_site_newsletters_0"><input type="checkbox" name="site_newsletters" value="55" class="list-no-bullets" id="id_5ed468_site_newsletters_0"> Daily Dive <span class="secondary-label">M-F</span>
<a class="xsmall signup-view-sample" href="/user_media/thumbnails/newsletter_lists/sc_2018.png" target="_blank">view sample</a>
<p class="newsletter-description small">Topics covered: logistics, freight, operations, procurement, regulation, technology, risk/resilience and more.</p>
</label>
</li>
<li><label for="id_5ed468_site_newsletters_1"><input type="checkbox" name="site_newsletters" value="326" class="list-no-bullets" id="id_5ed468_site_newsletters_1"> Operations Weekly <span class="secondary-label">Every Tuesday</span>
<a class="xsmall signup-view-sample" href="/user_media/thumbnails/newsletter_lists/sc_operations_2018.png" target="_blank">view sample</a>
<p class="newsletter-description small">Topics covered: S&OP, inventory/demand planning, technology integration, DC/warehouse management, and more.</p>
</label>
</li>
<li><label for="id_5ed468_site_newsletters_2"><input type="checkbox" name="site_newsletters" value="719" class="list-no-bullets" id="id_5ed468_site_newsletters_2"> Procurement Weekly <span class="secondary-label">Every Thursday</span>
<p class="newsletter-description small">Topics covered: Supplier relationships, payments & contracts, risk management, sustainability & ethics, trade & tariffs, and more.</p>
</label>
</li>
<li><label for="id_5ed468_site_newsletters_3"><input type="checkbox" name="site_newsletters" value="2109" class="list-no-bullets" id="id_5ed468_site_newsletters_3"> Logistics Weekly <span class="secondary-label">Every Wednesday</span>
<p class="newsletter-description small">Topics covered: last mile, shipper-carrier relations, and trends in rail, ocean, air, truck, and parcel shipping.</p>
</label>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="interstitial-consent-container">
<input name="user_consent" value="1" id="id_user_consent" type="checkbox">
<span> By signing up to receive our newsletter, you agree to our <a href="https://www.industrydive.com/terms-of-use/" target="_blank">Terms of Use</a> and
<a href="https://www.industrydive.com/privacy-policy/" target="_blank">Privacy Policy</a>. You can unsubscribe at anytime. </span>
</div>
</div>
<input id="signup-inter-submit" class="email_submit submit button" type="submit" data-role="none" value="Subscribe today">
</form>
GET /search/
<form action="/search/" method="GET" data-ajax="false">
<label for="search-mobile">
<span class="screen-reader-text">Search</span>
<input id="search-mobile" type="search" name="q" placeholder="Search" data-role="none">
</label>
<button type="submit" value="" data-role="none" class="analytics t-search-navigation-mobile">
<img src="/static/img/menu_icons/search.svg?320116291121" width="15" height="15" alt="search">
</button>
</form>
Name: signup — POST /signup/
<form class="form js-form-email-validate" name="signup" action="/signup/" method="POST">
<label for="id_5490c0_email" class="email-input js-email-input">
<span class="screen-reader-text">Email:</span>
<input type="email" name="email" placeholder="Work email address" class="email" required="" id="id_5490c0_email">
</label>
<input type="hidden" name="signup_box_location" value="integrated_menu">
<input type="hidden" name="signup_initial_url_path" value="/trendline/last-mile-delivery/352/">
<input type="hidden" name="js_enabled" value="1" id="id_5490c0_js_enabled">
<ul class="signup-list list-no-bullets">
<li>
<label><span class="screen-reader-text">Select Newsletter:</span></label>
<input id="newsletter-integrated_menu-checkbox-55" type="checkbox" name="site_newsletters" value="55" class="checkbox">
<label for="newsletter-integrated_menu-checkbox-55">
<span class="newsletter-title">Daily Dive</span>
<span class="secondary-label">M-F</span>
</label>
</li>
<li>
<label><span class="screen-reader-text">Select Newsletter:</span></label>
<input id="newsletter-integrated_menu-checkbox-326" type="checkbox" name="site_newsletters" value="326" class="checkbox">
<label for="newsletter-integrated_menu-checkbox-326">
<span class="newsletter-title">Operations Weekly</span>
<span class="secondary-label">Every Tuesday</span>
</label>
</li>
<li>
<label><span class="screen-reader-text">Select Newsletter:</span></label>
<input id="newsletter-integrated_menu-checkbox-719" type="checkbox" name="site_newsletters" value="719" class="checkbox">
<label for="newsletter-integrated_menu-checkbox-719">
<span class="newsletter-title">Procurement Weekly</span>
<span class="secondary-label">Every Thursday</span>
</label>
</li>
<li>
<label><span class="screen-reader-text">Select Newsletter:</span></label>
<input id="newsletter-integrated_menu-checkbox-2109" type="checkbox" name="site_newsletters" value="2109" class="checkbox">
<label for="newsletter-integrated_menu-checkbox-2109">
<span class="newsletter-title">Logistics Weekly</span>
<span class="secondary-label">Every Wednesday</span>
</label>
</li>
<li>
<label><span class="screen-reader-text">Select user consent:</span></label>
<input type="checkbox" name="user_consent" id="id_user_consent-integrated_menu" value="1" class="checkbox">
<label for="id_user_consent-integrated_menu">
<span class="signup-user-consent_box">
<span> By signing up to receive our newsletter, you agree to our <a href="https://www.industrydive.com/terms-of-use/" target="_blank">Terms of Use</a> and
<a href="https://www.industrydive.com/privacy-policy/" target="_blank">Privacy Policy</a>. You can unsubscribe at anytime. </span>
</span>
</label>
</li>
</ul>
<button class="button button--medium signup-button" type="submit" value="Sign up">Sign up</button>
<label class="error email_error" style="display:none;">A valid email address is required.</label>
<label class="error newsletter-error" style="display:none;">Please select at least one newsletter.</label>
</form>
Text Content
Skip to main content DON’T MISS TOMORROW’S SUPPLY CHAIN INDUSTRY NEWS Let Supply Chain Dive’s free newsletter keep you informed, straight from your inbox. * Daily Dive M-F view sample Topics covered: logistics, freight, operations, procurement, regulation, technology, risk/resilience and more. * Operations Weekly Every Tuesday view sample Topics covered: S&OP, inventory/demand planning, technology integration, DC/warehouse management, and more. * Procurement Weekly Every Thursday Topics covered: Supplier relationships, payments & contracts, risk management, sustainability & ethics, trade & tariffs, and more. * Logistics Weekly Every Wednesday Topics covered: last mile, shipper-carrier relations, and trends in rail, ocean, air, truck, and parcel shipping. By signing up to receive our newsletter, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe at anytime. * * * * * Reading Now Deliveries keep getting faster. Will it last? By: Max Garland * Reading Now US Postal Service outlines next steps to becoming ‘the preferred delivery provider’ By: Max Garland * Reading Now How consumers’ shifting sentiment around delivery creates peak margin opportunity By: Pitney Bowes * Reading Now Amazon pulls back from UPS as it builds out logistics empire By: Max Garland * Reading Now FedEx slumps, Amazon slows and more takeaways from a top shipping index By: Max Garland * Reading Now What drone companies need to do to reach lofty delivery goals By: Max Garland * Reading Now FedEx and Amazon still haven’t figured out sidewalk delivery robots. Will mass adoption ever come? By: Max Garland * Reading Now Why delivery robots face a regulatory ‘nightmare’ By: Max Garland Trendline LAST-MILE DELIVERY A robot from Serve Robotics makes a delivery. Courtesy of Serve Robotics NOTE FROM THE EDITOR Last-mile delivery services are evolving to better address consumer needs and competitive pressures. The time it takes for goods to reach doorsteps has shrunk in recent years, but slower delivery options have become more popular amid inflationary pressures. Carriers are also streamlining their networks and adjusting their customer mix in the face of easing demand. While legacy providers push for improvement, emerging firms are leveraging technology to carve out their own niches. Drones and sidewalk-roaming robots offer upside in terms of speed, cost and sustainability, but various hurdles complicate their mass adoption. Take a look at this trendline for a peek into the shakeups happening now — or on the horizon — in the last-mile delivery space. Max Garland Senior Reporter * Reading Now Deliveries keep getting faster. Will it last? By: Max Garland * Reading Now US Postal Service outlines next steps to becoming ‘the preferred delivery provider’ By: Max Garland * Sponsored How consumers’ shifting sentiment around delivery creates peak margin opportunity Sponsored content by Pitney Bowes * Reading Now Amazon pulls back from UPS as it builds out logistics empire By: Max Garland * Reading Now FedEx slumps, Amazon slows and more takeaways from a top shipping index By: Max Garland * Reading Now What drone companies need to do to reach lofty delivery goals By: Max Garland * Reading Now FedEx and Amazon still haven’t figured out sidewalk delivery robots. Will mass adoption ever come? By: Max Garland * Reading Now Why delivery robots face a regulatory ‘nightmare’ By: Max Garland DELIVERIES KEEP GETTING FASTER. WILL IT LAST? Shippers adjusted to pandemic-related disruptions to reach customers faster. But shifting shopper preferences and cost-cutting efforts may slow things down. By: Max Garland • Published June 12, 2023 Deliveries continue to get faster, but further improvements will be hard to realize in an era of shifting consumer preferences and cost mitigation among shippers. In April, the time between a customer placing an order and final delivery fell to an average of four days, according to project44’s “State of Last Mile” report released in May, compared to 5.6 days in April 2022. The company’s supply chain visibility platform tracks more than 1 billion shipments annually. DELIVERY SPEEDS CONTINUE TO IMPROVE Average number of days between an order being placed and it being delivered, by week “Looking farther back on historical delivery times, 2023 is seeing the quickest delivery times that the Last Mile market has seen in years,” the report said. Carson Krieg, project44’s head of industry growth and last mile solutions, told Supply Chain Dive that a “healthy average” for end-to-end fulfillment is between four to six days. That raises the question of how much more delivery times can shrink. “I think there’s going to be some mediation to the norm,” Krieg said. WHAT’S FUELING FASTER DELIVERIES? There are many reasons why delivery speeds have improved, according to Krieg. On the transportation side, parcel carriers no longer have the capacity constraints that challenged their service levels in the early days of the pandemic. Shippers have diversified their carrier mix, tapping into speed advantages new delivery providers may have on certain lanes. “A two day point for UPS going from Southern California to Northern California may be a next day point for OnTrac,” Krieg said. On the fulfillment side, companies have moved inventory closer to end consumers, most notably Amazon and its shift to a regional network model. Retailers have been pushing for years to better compete with the delivery speeds offered by Amazon’s massive warehouse network, said Martin Dresner, professor and chair of the University of Maryland’s logistics, business and public policy department. The pandemic accelerated those efforts, particularly for ship-from-store initiatives. Other major retailers have also been bolstering their fulfillment investments and efforts. Walmart’s store-fulfilled delivery sales nearly tripled over a two-year period, with the company seeing more than $1 billion a month in that category. Meanwhile, Target announced a $100-million investment earlier this year to leverage its store footprint for next-day deliveries, building upon its stores-as-hubs strategy. Walmart announced the launch of its second store-based fulfillment center in Bentonville, Arkansas, in May to provide quicker and more accurate online order fulfillment. Courtesy of Walmart It’s not just the Amazons and Walmarts of the world speeding up deliveries. American Eagle and Nordstrom have reported quicker timeframes to reach customers on recent earnings calls. “We are delivering better service to our customers through faster delivery, with overall delivery speed up 9% from last year,” Nordstrom CEO Erik Nordstrom said on a May 31 earnings call. COST MITIGATION, CONSUMER WANTS COULD SLOW DELIVERIES A confluence of factors will likely limit delivery speeds from going much faster, if not slow them down outright. Retailers have been cautious in recent months about leveraging higher-cost shipping services in an inflationary environment that’s biting into their bottom line. In turn, the demand for express deliveries using air cargo networks has waned, with many shippers instead calling for more economical ground transportation. “We can be in that three to five day click-to-deliver timeline,” said Laura Ritchey, COO at e-commerce fulfillment provider Radial. “It gets really expensive to go faster than that.” Companies shifting to more regional fulfillment models like Amazon could lower transit times and shipping costs. But it’s a risky venture for companies lacking the robust infrastructure and forecasting capabilities that Amazon has. If demand starts to shift, inventory may be stationed in areas where it isn’t as economical or fast to ship out of, said Vijay Ramachandran, Pitney Bowes’ vice president of go-to-market enablement and experience. “The more you segregate your inventory across the country, the more you have to be really buttoned up with demand planning and have a good idea of where your demand is going to surface geographically,” Ramachandran said. Poor forecasting makes it harder to deliver on time, which is likely to lead to unhappy shoppers, even if transit times are still relatively fast. Sixty-two percent of consumers say an accurate estimated delivery date is more important than fast shipping, according to Pitney Bowes BOXpoll market survey data. But many retailers haven’t slowed down their delivery promises to improve accuracy. On-time performance dropped from 83.9% to 80.4% YoY in April, per project44, which attributed much of this decline in its May report to “the aggressive timeframe that some companies promise to deliver within.” Retailers will need to strike a balance between cost mitigation and meeting consumers’ expectations in order to improve their delivery offerings for the long run, experts say. “We’re in a post-COVID environment, but it is not the same as where we were pre-COVID,” Ramachandran said. “That shift requires some new assumptions around what’s important to consumers.” Article top image credit: Brandon Bell/Getty Images via Getty Images US POSTAL SERVICE OUTLINES NEXT STEPS TO BECOMING ‘THE PREFERRED DELIVERY PROVIDER’ The priorities for the third year of the agency’s transformation plan include growing revenue via new shipping services and boosting local delivery speeds. By: Max Garland • Published May 24, 2023 The financially ailing Postal Service wants to draw more commercial shippers into its network to generate more revenue and counteract declining mail volumes. Shippers with USPS are slated to receive a lot of attention in the next steps of the agency’s 10-year transformation plan under Postmaster General Louis DeJoy. Priorities for year three of the plan include growing revenue through new shipping services and accelerating local delivery speeds with new facilities, according to the agency’s two-year progress report released in April. It’s a big undertaking, considering the agency didn’t achieve the plan’s 2023 break-even prediction and how long its focus has been on handling mail rather than packages. But DeJoy has expressed confidence that the transformation will enable the Postal Service to more effectively compete against private delivery providers like FedEx and UPS in areas including price. “I believe we can become the preferred delivery provider in the nation, reclaiming volume we have lost over the years and capturing a significant portion of the future growth in the marketplace,” DeJoy said in a keynote address at the National Postal Forum in Charlotte, North Carolina. NEW, STREAMLINED SERVICES The Postal Service expects to see $24 billion in net package revenue growth under its Delivering for America strategy, and its best opportunity to take share from FedEx and UPS could come from a plan to consolidate existing services into one offering. The agency aims to streamline three package shipping options — USPS Retail Ground, Parcel Select Ground and First-Class Package Service — into a new product, USPS Ground Advantage. It’s set to launch the service on July 9, pending review from the Postal Regulatory Commission. The Postal Service said in a news release that the service provides a more affordable way to ship packages up to 70 pounds in two-to-five business days. The agency is proposing for USPS Ground Advantage prices to be 1.4% lower relative to current Parcel Select Ground and First-Class Package Service pricing. Ground Advantage could pose “a significant challenge” to FedEx and UPS even though the two delivery giants have more customized and flexible shipping services, Joshua Galbraith, business development manager at ShipMatrix, said in a LinkedIn post. “It is likely that with the introduction of the USPS Ground Advantage service, FedEx and UPS may need to reconsider their pricing strategies to compete with the significant price advantage of USPS,” Galbraith said. A U.S. Postal Service worker unpacks packages from a truck on December 2, 2019 in San Francisco, California. Justin Sullivan via Getty Images Beyond Ground Advantage, the Postal Service expects further package revenue growth will be driven largely by USPS Connect, a wide-ranging offering that includes same-day and next-day delivery. The program, launched in 2022, has a suite of services including Connect Regional and Connect Local. Connect Regional provides next-day regional delivery by having shippers dropping off packages at facilities close to the final destination. The service has brought in $1.1 billion in revenue by offering direct network access to medium and large-sized shippers, per a Postal Service progress report. Connect Local, on the other hand, offers same-day and next-day delivery for local businesses within their communities. The service, which is now available nationwide, has shippers bring packages or envelopes to a designated local postal facility for speedy delivery. More than 27,000 customers have registered for the program, the report said, despite a tepid reception in initial tests of its document-focused shipping service. “The potential of the new suite of services will be maximized when we complete the realignment of our network,” the report said. FACILITY CONSOLIDATION AIMS TO SPEED UP DELIVERIES To keep up with growth in its package delivery services, the Postal Service is overhauling its network for speed and efficiency. The agency has targeted key markets where it can consolidate delivery units — the final facility parcels go through before delivery — into fewer and more centrally located Sorting and Delivery Centers. “Historically, [delivery units] were opened to meet growing demand, which ultimately created clusters of facilities close to each other, especially in busy metro areas,” the agency’s report said, adding that it led to operational inefficiencies. The Postal Service opened its first Sorting and Delivery Center in Athens, Georgia, last fall before launching five additional centers in Florida, New York, Texas and Massachusetts in February, according to the report. The U.S. Postal Service outlines what its new network model will look like once its transformation plan is implemented. U.S. Postal Service The agency is preparing for further growth of this network, as it has evaluated more than 100 potential new locations nationwide. DeJoy told Supply Chain Dive in 2022 that vacant postal facilities are a prime target to set up new Sorting and Delivery Centers. Local communities across the U.S. have griped about Postal Service delivery delays in recent months, even despite year-over-year improvements in on-time mail performance overall. The agency says the end result of its buildout will be faster processing and delivery speeds between local retailers and their customers, as the centers will be able to quickly reach 200,000 customers in a local market. “We must now execute rapidly on our plans to deploy our network,” DeJoy said at the National Postal Forum. “This is the only way to achieve the service and cost improvements necessary for us to fulfill our mission to rescue this organization.” Article top image credit: Drew Angerer via Getty Images Sponsored HOW CONSUMERS’ SHIFTING SENTIMENT AROUND DELIVERY CREATES PEAK MARGIN OPPORTUNITY Sponsored content By Pitney Bowes By: Vijay Ramachandran, VP of GTM (Go-to-Market) Enablement + Experience, Pitney Bowes • Published July 1, 2023 Raise your hand if “regression to the mean” was on your 2023 buzzword bingo card. Many pundits have used the term to describe the current state of ecommerce adoption and growth, as market data show a significant—albeit not precipitous—drop in ecommerce sales. However, the latest Pitney Bowes Parcel Shipping Index, which uses a variety of data sources and a proprietary forecasting model to triangulate prior year shipments and anticipate how many direct-to-consumer deliveries will be completed over the next five years, has found that using the term to forecast the years ahead may be overly simplistic and even misleading. A secular shift forward According to the Index, US consumers received only 2% fewer parcels in 2022 versus the year before. More astonishingly, shipping volumes in 2023 are expected to clock in a full year and one billion parcels ahead of what the 2019 Index originally forecasted would occur by 2023, well before COVID supercharged the ecommerce market. Further, the Index’s 5-year outlook calls for shipping volumes to continue to exceed pre-COVID forecasts moving forward. Even the US Commerce Department’s revised Q1 ecommerce report shows a nearly 8% increase in online sales versus 2022Q1, compared to a meager 3.4% increase in overall retail sales. In fact, 2023Q1 ecommerce exceeded peak 2022(Q4) online sales by 3%. In other words: the regression has been overhyped. This seemingly permanent shift in channel preferences validates findings from a companion report, the Pitney Bowes Order Experience Index, which tracks changes in consumer expectations and preferences around delivery, tracking, unboxing and returns: consumers are shifting attitudes in ways that resemble neither 2019 nor any year since. Many consumers—especially more affluent information workers—are now working in hybrid environments and no longer have a set daily or weekly schedule, where personal errands, kids’ activities, travel and work are all increasingly intertwined. While they may have the flexibility to be home to receive an occasional urgent delivery, having every ecommerce site promise a conformant 2-day delivery window has become a nuisance. What’s more, urgent purchases are once again easy at local stores, so the need for same-day and next-day delivery has lost significant utility—as evidenced by tumbling express volumes for both major private carriers—particularly for consumers who are constantly on the move and are willing to settle for a “good enough” product at a store nearby. Consumers’ tracking trust issues These dynamics have shifted online shoppers’ priority from fast delivery to accurate delivery estimates. In fact, the Pitney Bowes Order Experience Index revealed that more than half of online shoppers consider early deliveries to be inconvenient. A package arriving before the estimated date may sit unattended on a porch or in a mailroom while the shopper isn’t home, raising the risk of theft or damage. However, the emphasis on delivery estimate accuracy doesn’t mean consumers have thumbs hovering over their phones to refresh tracking info. In fact, Pitney Bowes weekly BOXpoll surveys reveal that consumers are checking tracking less often now on average than any other time in the past two years. Carrier delays have become less common and delivery times have gotten faster as carrier capacity constraints of the past two years have reversed. Combined with stores satisfying consumers’ more urgent purchases, the trust issues consumers once had with in-transit delivery accuracy have diminished. Permission granted by Pitney Bowes Permission granted by Pitney Bowes The peak margin opportunity If tracking frequency is on the decline and consumers aren’t “appointment buying” online, what impact will this have on retailers? Two takeaways: * Use more affordable ground services for your free/deferred shipping method at checkout—you will see significant savings in one of your largest cost centers. * Set clear delivery date expectations up front and use precise dates where possible. The adage “underpromise and overdeliver” doesn’t earn you any brownie points with today’s consumer. As a bonus, our data shows that consumers are even more lenient with delivery transit times during peak season. Pitney Bowes BOXpoll data reveals that consumers check tracking less in Q4 than any other time of year. From October to early December, when consumers are busier than ever but not yet at risk of missing a gifting occasion, shoppers are far less likely to be sticklers about specific-date delivery estimates. Given the challenging macro environment, brands have a narrow window of opportunity to save money with more non-day-definite shipping options without costing consumer expectations. Article top image credit: Mihaela Rosu/iStock/Getty Images Plus AMAZON PULLS BACK FROM UPS AS IT BUILDS OUT LOGISTICS EMPIRE While UPS’ priorities have shifted, Amazon’s capabilities have transformed. But both face obstacles that could complicate plans to reduce business with each other. By: Max Garland • Published March 3, 2023 UPS plans to further reduce its business with top customer Amazon in 2023, even as both companies face obstacles that could complicate their mutually agreed cutback. Amazon is shifting away from UPS and other carriers as it works to build its own logistics empire, in part to gain greater control over transit times and the end-customer’s delivery experience. Meanwhile, UPS has chased growth in segments outside of e-commerce in order to boost its profit margins. Estimates from MWPVL International, a firm tracking Amazon’s growth, demonstrates the impact of both companies’ respective evolutions. The number of Amazon packages UPS handled in 2022 was 1.3 billion, down from 1.41 billion the year before. “We’re just starting to see a slight decline in the absolute package volume,” Marc Wulfraat, MWPVL president and founder, said. “Prior to that it was always growing, because the total volume of packages was growing … Now Amazon’s got such a large scope of coverage that they can do [it] themselves.” AMAZON-RELATED REVENUE FALLS AS UPS REFOCUSES UPS’ revenue tied to Amazon fell from 13.3% in 2020 to 11.3% in 2022, according to a UPS securities filing. Cowen analysts said in a January note that the 2022 percentage would have been lower, barring a $1.3-billion currency impact from a strong U.S. dollar. Although Amazon-related revenue jumped in 2020 as the e-commerce giant scrambled to meet demand at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, it declined over the following two years as UPS began to focus on attracting more profitable deliveries from healthcare companies and smaller shippers. SHARE OF UPS REVENUE TIED TO AMAZON SHRINKS Percentage of UPS consolidated revenues represented by Amazon, since 2019 “We look favorably on their ongoing efforts to manage down the percent of low margin B2C business that they are willing to take,” Cowen analysts said of UPS’ efforts to reduce its share of Amazon-related revenue. The decline in Amazon business is affecting more than just revenue. In Q4, UPS’ average daily U.S. domestic volume fell 3.8% YoY, with about half of that drop coming from Amazon, CFO Brian Newman said on a Jan. 31 earnings call. The companies planned for that decline through a previously arranged contractual agreement, he added. UPS expects the volume decline in its U.S. segment to continue this year, fueled by Amazon insourcing more of its own deliveries, Newman said. He noted that growth from other customers will nearly offset the drop. “We’ll continue on a mutually agreed path to glide that business down in 2023,” Newman said of Amazon. A reduction in the amount of business UPS does with Amazon isn’t necessarily a bad thing for the carrier, since it’s a prepared decline as opposed to an unexpected drop, LPF Spend Management founder Nate Skiver said in a LinkedIn post. He added that UPS can recapture lost revenue with fewer packages by leaning on higher-yielding shipments from smaller businesses. AMAZON BUILDS A NETWORK TO RIVAL UPS While UPS’ priorities have shifted, Amazon’s capabilities have transformed. The e-commerce giant leverages UPS in instances where capacity constraints limit its ability to move packages itself, Wulfraat said. The company also needs UPS to deliver in areas where Amazon’s sprawling network of logistics facilities hasn’t yet reached. “There’s no fulfillment center or sortation center or delivery station operated by Amazon anywhere close to Billings, Montana,” Wulfraat said. “So let’s say the order that you’re placing happens to be coming from the Phoenix fulfillment center. The only way that Amazon can get that merchandise to the customer in two days is to leverage the resources of UPS.” Still, Amazon’s aggressive buildout of sortation centers, delivery stations and transportation infrastructure has allowed it to deliver significantly more parcels in-house overall. The company’s market share for U.S. parcel volumes grew to 22% in 2021, beating out UPS rival FedEx, according to the Pitney Bowes Parcel Shipping Index. AMAZON’S MARKET SHARE GROWS TO RIVAL TOP CARRIERS Market share of U.S. parcel volume, 2014 to 2021 “We took a fulfillment center footprint that we’ve built over 25 years and doubled it in just a couple of years,” Amazon President and CEO Andy Jassy said on a Feb. 2 earnings call. “And then we, at the same time, built out a transportation network for last mile roughly the size of UPS in a couple of years.” AMAZON’S PULLBACK, WEAK DEMAND COULD SLOW THE SPLIT Two factors could complicate Amazon’s planned reduction of UPS business, according to experts. Amazon has closed several warehouses and canceled plans for future facilities in recent months as the company attempts to trim its operating expenses. This pullback in its logistics buildout could lead Amazon to have an equal or greater reliance on UPS compared to last year, Wulfraat said. Possible relief in parcel rates could also weigh on Amazon’s use of UPS. Pricing power is slowly shifting back in favor of shippers as demand softens, following years of capacity constraints and added fees. Pricing has always been at top of mind for Amazon when it comes to transportation, and the company will pursue the lowest-cost option whether it’s in-house or through a third party, said Shipium co-founder and CEO Jason Murray, who was the former vice president of supply chain and retail services at Amazon. It’s in Amazon’s best interest to maintain its relationship with UPS “and have them essentially as a backup.” “If they see softness in UPS’ demand and cost structure, they will jump on that and bring down their own cost structure by taking advantage of that,” Murray said of Amazon. Article top image credit: Stephanie Keith via Getty Images FEDEX SLUMPS, AMAZON SLOWS AND MORE TAKEAWAYS FROM A TOP SHIPPING INDEX New U.S. parcel delivery data from Pitney Bowes outlines the extent of top carriers’ volume declines, and what lies ahead for the sector. By: Max Garland • Published March 28, 2023 U.S. parcel delivery demand fell back to earth in 2022, leaving top carriers like FedEx scrambling to cut costs and readjust their networks for an uncertain future. Data released March 28 from the Pitney Bowes Parcel Shipping Index outlines the extent of these volume declines, along with which delivery providers fared the best in a difficult environment. Here are five charts based on that data, covering trends such as UPS and Amazon’s decoupling, the growth of regional carriers and what lies ahead for the delivery sector. PARCEL VOLUMES FELL, BUT REVENUES INCREASED After years of growth, U.S. parcel volumes declined 2.2% from 2021 to 2022, according to the index. Carriers struggled to beat tough year-over-year comparisons as e-commerce demand cooled off following a surge from the COVID-19 pandemic. Delivery providers’ pricing power remained firm despite lower volumes. U.S. parcel revenues grew 6.5% YoY, which Pitney Bowes said was driven by inflation and higher fuel surcharges. Vijay Ramachandran, the company’s vice president of go-to-market enablement and experience, pointed out additional reasons for the divergence between volumes and revenues. Many consumers with high spending power moved from the cities to suburban and exurban areas, increasing the cost to deliver to them. Additionally, carriers spent heavily to expand their capacity after many networks were overwhelmed by a flood of packages when the pandemic first took hold. Now, they’re pushing to recoup their investment and continue to increase rates. “I think these additional logistics costs are really paying for the investment that happened a couple years ago,” Ramachandran said. CARRIERS BOOST REVENUES DESPITE DECLINING DEMAND Year-over-year growth in U.S. parcel market volume and revenues FEDEX SAW THE STEEPEST VOLUME DROP, AMAZON MOMENTUM STOPS FedEx had the largest percentage jump in U.S. volumes among the top parcel carriers in 2021, and it followed up that performance in 2022 with the sharpest overall decline. This swing underscores the turbulence Raj Subramaniam has encountered in the beginning of his tenure as FedEx CEO, with plummeting demand driving the company to slash costs to reduce pressure on its bottom line. UPS and the U.S. Postal Service also encountered volume declines in 2022 in a softening demand environment. Amazon Logistics’ volume remained flat, a pronounced slowdown from the blistering pace of growth the e-commerce giant’s in-house delivery arm saw the previous six years. The company has closed and canceled dozens of warehouses to reduce the burden of fixed costs while better matching capacity to demand. TOP CARRIERS BORE THE BRUNT OF SOFTENING DELIVERY ACTIVITY U.S. parcel volumes shipped since 2015, by carrier UPS CHARTS A SEPARATE PATH FROM TOP CUSTOMER While UPS fared better than rival FedEx in terms of volume loss last year, it has ceded the most market share among carriers since 2016, per the index. Meanwhile, its top customer Amazon has seen its market share by volume grow significantly during that period. What changed? The relationship between the two companies, for one. UPS has prioritized attracting more profitable shipper segments rather than customers like Amazon, which offer plenty of volume but at low margins. Meanwhile, Amazon has built up its own logistics capabilities to deliver more of its customers’ orders in-house, reducing its reliance on third-party carriers. “We’ll continue on a mutually agreed path to glide that business down in 2023,” UPS CFO Brian Newman said of Amazon on a Jan. 31 earnings call. This gradual shift has resulted in many deliveries that would have originally gone to UPS being completed by Amazon instead. AMAZON BITES INTO UPS’ SHARE OF PARCEL SECTOR U.S. parcel market share by volume SMALLER CARRIERS CONTINUE MOMENTUM After nearly doubling their package volume in 2021, smaller U.S. parcel carriers again saw strong growth in 2022 despite a more challenging environment. Volume and revenue for carriers outside of UPS, FedEx, the Postal Service and Amazon grew by roughly 25% and 29%, respectively, YoY. Alternatives to the top carriers have seen strong interest from shippers seeking lower delivery rates and insurance against capacity constraints. They have also expanded their coverage areas and leveraged partnerships with software providers and shipping platforms to boost their customer reach. These delivery providers — including LaserShip/OnTrac, Lone Star Overnight and Spee-Dee Delivery — still have a long way to go to rival FedEx and UPS, as they made up just 2% of market share by volume combined last year. They may also have trouble attracting customers in a challenging economic climate, as volume discounts from national carriers become more appealing. ″[Carrier] diversification is a risk-mitigation strategy, but it may not be a cost-saving strategy,” said Pitney Bowes’ Ramachandran. DELIVERY ALTERNATIVES SAW FURTHER GROWTH IN 2022 U.S. parcel volumes for carriers outside of UPS, FedEx, the Postal Service and Amazon VOLUME GROWTH EXPECTED TO SLOW DOWN Macroeconomic uncertainty, inflationary pressures and market normalization after COVID-19 are all poised to weigh on U.S. parcel volume growth going forward, according to the index. It forecasts a compound annual growth rate of 5% from 2023 to 2028 as the most likely scenario, down from 10.8% CAGR between 2016 and 2022. This rate would result in roughly 28 billion parcels in the U.S. market in 2028, although the index projects that volumes could end up being as low as 24 billion or as high as 32 billion. A key factor in the end result will be e-commerce activity, which remains strong even amid the current cooldown, said Ramachandran. Parcel volumes are a full year ahead of the index’s pre-pandemic forecasts. “What that means is that there is some staying power to online shopping, online penetration, direct-to-consumer shipping and delivery, and it hasn’t reverted back to the mean of where we thought things were going to be,” he said. A WEAKER GROWTH RATE PROJECTED FOR PARCEL MARKET U.S. parcel volumes shipped since 2015. Data for 2023-2028 is projected, based on 5% growth each year Article top image credit: Spencer Platt/Getty Images via Getty Images WHAT DRONE COMPANIES NEED TO DO TO REACH LOFTY DELIVERY GOALS Zipline and Alphabet’s Wing aim to scale up and reach more customers, but it will take more than their internal capabilities to secure long-term success and adoption. By: Max Garland • Published March 29, 2023 Two big names in the drone delivery space — Zipline and Alphabet’s Wing — unveiled major upgrades to their abilities to service customers in March that may need some help in order to shake up last mile transportation. While their respective upgrades differ, both have the same goal in mind: Scale up and reach more customers. Wing expects its drone delivery network will be able to handle millions of deliveries by mid-2024, while Zipline aims to operate more flights annually than most airlines by 2025. For the two companies to achieve that, it will take more than a sizable investment to succeed — just ask Amazon, which has reportedly encountered drone safety challenges and limited delivery activity. They will need to lower operating costs by maximizing their networks’ efficiency and get regulators and consumers on their side in order to deliver on the hype of drone technology. Otherwise, it will take much longer for drones to deliver on the hype and become as ubiquitous in neighborhoods as delivery vans are, experts say. INCREASING DENSITY, ADJUSTING REGULATIONS TO LOWER COSTS Carriers are working to increase density in the last mile delivery space, like having their couriers make as many deliveries as possible on a single route to minimize operating costs. While drones are generally limited to lightweight payloads, a network can create its own version of density by ensuring its fleet is in constant motion, making pickups and deliveries as often as they can to sustain the business model. “The worst thing is to have your vehicle, whether it’s a drone or a truck, sitting idle,” said James Campbell, a professor of supply chain and analytics at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. “The way this makes the most sense is if you can get the huge scale so your drones are flying all the time. You’re spreading your fixed costs for the facilities over many, many drones and many, many deliveries.” Although delivery density is a critical part of the equation, it is only one avenue to lower operating costs, Eric Peck, CEO of drone logistics platform Swoop Aero, said in an email. Operators that design faster drones can respond to demand quicker and provide a more valuable offering to customers, which can translate into more profitable services. Increased delivery range can help, too, by unlocking new lines of business for drone companies, such as offshore maritime logistics. One pilot monitoring multiple aircraft would also help operators maximize the return on their network investments, Peck said. A McKinsey report published in January affirmed this view, saying that with current pilot limitations in place, drone delivery struggles to be competitive with other last mile transportation modes in terms of operating costs. The cost of a single-package drone delivery in which one person is monitoring the drone is about $13.50, according to the report. If a single drone operator is able to manage 20 drones simultaneously instead of just one at a time, the per-delivery cost plummets to around $1.80. DRONES HAVE MOST TO GAIN FROM EFFICIENT DELIVERY OPERATIONS Direct operating cost for a five-mile delivery of a 216-cubic inch package, by transportation method and deliveries per operator. In the U.S., a waiver is required to operate multiple small drones with only one remote pilot, and operators also need certification in order to make drone deliveries beyond the visual line of sight of a pilot or observer. For DroneUp, which is helping Walmart advance its goal of making 1 million deliveries a year by drone, being restricted by visual line of sight regulations has limited the delivery radius of its drones to about two miles. Stretching that further would have significant upside — DroneUp COO Anthony Vittone noted that 90% of the country lives within ten miles of a Walmart. “Every mile that I add to that [drone delivery] radius triples and sometimes even quadruples the number of homes that have access to DroneUp delivery,” he said. CONSUMER BUY-IN, HABITS NEED TO EVOLVE As delivery activity increases, companies also have to field concerns within the communities they operate in. Vittone said some potential customers may have a fear of the unknown with drone delivery, as is common with many new technologies. To reduce uncertainty, employees field questions from the public at Walmart stores where they operate and also conduct demonstrations. Drone firms also have to consider potential disruptions their operations could create with the public. Wing, for example, has reportedly encountered noise complaints in Australia. The company said in emailed remarks to Supply Chain Dive that engaging with communities to answer questions and receive feedback is a top priority before launching new services. “The reality is that drone delivery brings significant benefits — reduced traffic congestion, fewer emissions, expanded opportunities for businesses, and a greater level of convenience for consumers — and these become apparent once drone delivery arrives,” Wing said. If companies can achieve public buy-in, it’s easy to see how drones could shake up traditional last mile delivery operations. They have speed as a distinct advantage over other forms of last mile transportation, as they are able to avoid ground traffic in their route to the customer. But Campbell questioned what items beyond food and emergency medicine are needed in 15 to 30 minutes — a shift in consumer behavior may need to take place, similar to what happened when FedEx first launched express parcel delivery or when Amazon accelerated delivery speeds for online orders. For drone delivery companies to reach that lofty, game-changing status, they will have to significantly expand their reach and capabilities first. With recent announcements in mind, that may be happening sooner rather than later. “Things in this space rarely happen before anyone says, but I guess I’m a lot more optimistic than I used to be that this is finally coming,” Campbell said. Article top image credit: Courtesy of Walmart press kit DroneUp announcement FEDEX AND AMAZON STILL HAVEN’T FIGURED OUT SIDEWALK DELIVERY ROBOTS. WILL MASS ADOPTION EVER COME? Delivery giants’ tests of autonomous bots fizzled out. But many industry insiders still believe that the technology can catch on. By: Max Garland • Published April 12, 2023 For a moment, a prototype FedEx robot made the last-mile delivery process compelling enough to be featured on late night television. “This is the future right here,” Jimmy Fallon said in 2019 as the company’s autonomous bot, later named Roxo, delivered The Tonight Show host a pizza. But despite the hype, the path to widespread adoption for sidewalk-roaming robots to deliver goods throughout the U.S. has been anything but straightforward. FedEx canned Roxo less than four years after its flashy debut, per an October statement. Amazon, meanwhile, ended field tests for its own delivery bot after it fell short on meeting customers’ needs. If logistics behemoths struggle to develop a successful formula for their delivery bot operations, can a long-term, sustainable business model ever be realized? Many of the executives, researchers and regulators interviewed by Supply Chain Dive say yes, and that current labor and inflation challenges could help the transportation mode get there sooner. Still, to be truly successful, insiders say the industry still needs to confront major hurdles around funding, segment diversification and more. WHY DELIVERY BOTS COULD GAIN POST-PANDEMIC MOMENTUM Although FedEx and Amazon have taken their leave, the delivery bot sector still has seasoned and growing players. Leaders at these tech companies say using their robots to bring goods to consumers — versus a human courier using a vehicle — can offer advantages that have become more evident in recent years. Chief among them is the potential to lower costs within the final mile of delivery, considered the most expensive step in the shipping process. With autonomous or remotely operated capabilities, delivery bots are insulated from climbing courier wages that standard providers pass on to the end customer. Additionally, they aren’t as exposed to jumps in gas prices that took a toll on carriers — and then their shippers — last year. “After COVID, you had challenges with labor,” said Ali Kashani, co-founder and CEO of delivery bot developer and operator Serve Robotics. “Then you had inflation and the cost of labor going up, and then you have the cost of gas going up. Every one of these things that has happened has become a tailwind for us.” DELIVERY WORKERS SEE GROWTH IN PAY Median usual weekly nominal earnings for driver/sales workers and delivery truck drivers 16 years and older, not seasonally adjusted And while bots roaming the sidewalks don’t have the range or capacity of gas-powered vehicles, they are well-suited to quickly respond to on-demand deliveries of small payloads originating from nearby businesses. This has led many bot companies to grow their businesses by focusing on food and convenience deliveries. Serve’s robots have completed orders on Uber Eats’ platform for Los Angeles customers, and 7-Eleven recently partnered with the company for testing in West Hollywood, California. Plenty of food delivery operations are also taking place at colleges, with Grubhub rolling out partnerships with tech companies Kiwibot and Cartken to serve on-campus demand. The question is if that is a large enough sandbox for these businesses to mature into self-sustaining operations. For Coco, whose bots make restaurant deliveries in Los Angeles, food makes sense as the initial order category to focus on, said co-founder and CEO Zach Rash. It’s a high-frequency order category with strong local demand and a need to be delivered quickly. However, he noted that over time there will be a need to diversify into other categories in order to maximize the use of its robots. “You need a lot of scale and you need a lot of density,” Rash said of the formula for long-term success in the delivery bot space. “Food is the best way for us to build up to that while making sure that we can maintain profitability on the way there.” Courtesy of Coco Although bots won’t become a one-size-fits-all approach to last mile delivery, there are other areas executives say the transportation method could see increased adoption in. Starship Technologies has robots delivering spare parts, testing supplies and samples in industrial campuses mostly in Germany, for example. And one day, industry players could be working directly with parcel vans and trucks to make deliveries, CEO Alastair Westgarth said. “We’re adding a new modality to delivery, not taking over the entire world of delivery,” he said. COMPLEX CHALLENGES CLASH WITH IMMEDIATE NEEDS The amount of deliveries completed by automated vehicles is still “barely measurable” today, acknowledged Cartken CEO Christian Bersch. To gain share from traditional transportation methods, companies operating robots will need funding to expand their service coverage, improve upon their existing technology and ultimately offer lower costs than competitors. But economic uncertainty has thinned the pool of funds available from venture capital and private equity firms, company executives say. Starship, a major player in the robotics space, cut back its staff and service areas in 2022 in a more difficult environment to secure funding. “We wanted to make sure that we adjusted to that dynamic and focused on making sure our company’s viable forever, so to speak,” Westgarth said, adding that Starship prioritized further improving its unit economics. Permission granted by Starship Technologies Although larger, diversified companies may have the financial muscle to scale up their own bot programs, success in the space requires patience as hurdles related to adoption, infrastructure and regulations loom large. This includes current range limitations for these bots, which means reaching new customers in suburban and exurban areas will be difficult. Starship’s Westgarth said cities and universities dominate the company’s business, with 90% of its focus being in those two categories. Long-term challenges can clash with near-term needs, as was the case with FedEx. The company said in its October statement that it canceled Roxo to “prioritize several nearer term opportunities” as overall demand for its services was slowing. Companies exclusively focused on deliveries via bot can’t simply cut the cord, and they still need to grow at a pace that meets investors’ expectations. Many executives say they remain cautious about ramping up too aggressively and without enough community buy-in, fearing a backlash similar to what e-scooters saw years ago. Bern Grush, executive director of the Urban Robotics Foundation, doesn’t buy it. “You want to tell your investor, ‘We don’t want to have 20,000 robots’?” said Grush, whose foundation aims to help member municipalities coordinate robot-related policies. “You want to tell your investor, ‘We’re happy with 12 robots’?...This whole industry needs to deliver a million things an hour.” Article top image credit: Courtesy of FedEx WHY DELIVERY ROBOTS FACE A REGULATORY ‘NIGHTMARE’ Laws for sidewalk-roaming bots have taken hold across states. But variances in each bill complicate the industry’s expansion plans. By: Max Garland • Published April 26, 2023 States can’t seem to agree on how to handle sidewalk delivery robots. Bots as heavy as 500 pounds can roam as fast as 4 miles per hour on Georgia sidewalks under state laws. In New Hampshire, robots can travel up to 10 miles per hour on sidewalks, but they can’t weigh more than 80 pounds. At 2022’s end, at least 23 states had some type of law governing how these delivery robots can ferry goods within their borders, according to data from the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center and Supply Chain Dive research. SIDEWALK-NAVIGATING DELIVERY BOT BILLS SPREAD ACROSS THE NATION State legislation on personal delivery devices signed into law since 2017 The proliferation of state laws around the deployment of delivery bots has been somewhat of a double-edged sword for tech developers. While companies can have more of a say in crafting legislation at the ground floor, the patchwork nature of these laws has also complicated national expansion. “It is going to be a nightmare to get all the states on the same page — there is massive variation,” said Ritukar Vijay, CEO and co-founder of delivery bot company Ottonomy. A resident takes out his order from a Starship Technologies delivery robot on April 8, 2020 in the Chevy Chase neighborhood of Washington, DC. Alex Wong via Getty Images DELIVERY BOTS INVADE STATEHOUSES While no states outright ban delivery bots, tech developers have decided to take a cautious approach to expansion rather than flood the market with robots and risk backlash. “We don’t do the ‘ask for forgiveness rather than permission’ approach,” said Serve Robotics CEO and co-founder Ali Kashani, noting how rapid expansion of e-scooters eventually soured public sentiment. Legislation has often been developed with the guiding hand of delivery bot operators. Starship Technologies, which has a partnership with Grubhub to roll out sidewalk bots to college campuses, worked with lawmakers to advance bills in Virginia, Idaho, Wisconsin and other states. State legislatures don’t always side with business interests, requiring bot developers to be actively engaged in the political process. Starship CEO Alastair Westgarth said the company has seen proposed bills that, despite intentions to provide a safe rollout, would have ultimately hindered delivery service. Ultimately, companies have to strike a balance between meeting their business objectives while addressing concerns over safety. That approach has helped Starship create value for both customers and the communities its bots operate in, Westgarth added. Political engagement also gives businesses a leg-up in ensuring their designs can be deployed smoothly. Variance in state laws often depends on which bot operator led the charge to pass a particular bill, said Carl Hansen, vice president and head of government relations of delivery bot company Coco. Starship’s work to pass legislation in 2017 and 2018, for example, was geared toward the particular characteristics of its robot, which can hold around 20 pounds of goods. Then, Amazon and FedEx pushed for legislation in 2019 and 2020 that catered to the different use cases for their particular bots, Hansen said. FedEx’s Roxo bot, which the company canceled to prioritize nearer-term goals, had 100 pounds of capacity. But in some state legislatures, companies have had to contend with more stiff resistance. Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed a 2022 bill that would have established rules for delivery bots to operate on sidewalks. She said in an explanation of the veto that lawmakers still had to address safety concerns like clarifying minimum liability provisions and who would oversee enforcement. There was no motion to reconsider the bill, which also generated concerns related to courier job security. Despite some opposition, legislation for sidewalk-traveling delivery bots have had clear momentum across statehouses. The push to regulate bot deployment is also somewhat recent — all of the bills signed into law were introduced in 2017 or later. “They’ll keep popping up,” Tom Holland, a Kansas state senator who opposed the bill in his legislature, said of new delivery bot legislation. The Kiwibot delivery bot on display during Vox Media’s 2022 Code Conference on September 6, 2022 in Beverly Hills, California. Jerod Harris via Getty Images A TOUGH TRANSITION FROM STATEHOUSES TO SIDEWALKS Regulatory approval doesn’t guarantee a smooth rollout. Operators and regulators have received some hard — but necessary — lessons through various tests, some conducted after laws were enacted. Pennsylvania signed delivery bot legislation into law in 2020, and the state’s transportation department authorized Kiwibot to make deliveries in 2021. The company made deliveries in Pittsburgh between September and December of that year as part of the Urbanism Next Center’s Knight Autonomous Vehicle Initiative, a $5.25-million effort to help cities develop a people-centered approach to the technology. Through the pilot program, the bots could make deliveries for a food truck, a pharmacy and a library in Pittsburgh’s Bloomfield neighborhood, per a report from the center. But the robots quickly ran into issues, unable to overcome cracked sidewalks or obstructions like overgrown trees. In total, Kiwibot completed four deliveries to customers and 972 simulated deliveries through the pilot. The company ultimately decided against a rollout in the neighborhood due to “infrastructure challenges,” the report said. In Detroit, where Kiwibot also tested out robot delivery in partnership with the Knight AV initiative, a local restaurant had issues getting their staff trained on using the technology, said Tim Slusser, director of mobility innovation for the city. By the time restaurant employees were familiar with the delivery bots, the business encountered staffing challenges and returned to their standard systems to minimize disruptions. The pilot then moved to a second local restaurant, but that presented its own issues — namely a lack of customer engagement. “Candidly, I believe it was just a little bit [of] a lack of awareness from the consumers that this was even an option,” Slusser said. “So what we ended up doing is working with the Kiwibot team to help them simulate as many runs as possible from different places that those restaurants typically have it delivered to.” Kiwibot only made 12 customer deliveries as part of the test in Detroit, but Slusser said the city has since become better prepared for new bot initiatives, such as Starship’s deployment on Wayne State University’s campus. Experts say more pilot programs like what occurred in Pittsburgh and Detroit will be necessary to weed out potential implementation issues. “It’s not a technology issue in many ways,” said Karen Lightman, executive director of Metro21 at Carnegie Mellon University, a research and implementation lab for smart cities. “It’s often the application, the human side and the policy side where it gets complicated and a little messy.” News Graphics Developer Jasmine Ye Han and Visuals Editor Shaun Lucas also contributed to this story. Article top image credit: Carlos Osorio/AP HOW LAST MILE DELIVERY IS EVOLVING Last-mile delivery services are evolving to better address consumer needs and competitive pressures. While legacy providers push for improvement, emerging firms are leveraging technology to carve out their own niches. INCLUDED IN THIS TRENDLINE * Amazon pulls back from UPS as it builds out logistics empire * Deliveries keep getting faster. Will it last? * Why delivery robots face a regulatory ‘nightmare’ Our Trendlines go deep on the biggest trends. These special reports, produced by our team of award-winning journalists, help business leaders understand how their industries are changing. Davide Savenije Editor-in-Chief at Industry Dive. Search * Home * Topics * Risk * Technology * Operations * Procurement * Logistics * Freight * Regulation * Deep Dive * Opinion * Library * Events * Press Releases GET SUPPLY CHAIN DIVE IN YOUR INBOX The free newsletter covering the top industry headlines Email: * Select Newsletter: Daily Dive M-F * Select Newsletter: Operations Weekly Every Tuesday * Select Newsletter: Procurement Weekly Every Thursday * Select Newsletter: Logistics Weekly Every Wednesday * Select user consent: By signing up to receive our newsletter, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe at anytime. Sign up A valid email address is required. Please select at least one newsletter.